Tumgik
#byler nation population
Text
Tumblr media
they’re in their dying hours...
600 notes · View notes
strawberrybyers · 2 years
Text
byler nation has a population count of 100k
Tumblr media
43 notes · View notes
sade-alicious · 1 year
Text
this is really random BUT if the entire byler nation on tumblr were to compile and create our own city of just us in the U.S. we’d be ranked #80 for population size
10 notes · View notes
knownoshamc · 2 years
Text
Just wanted to say that there are countries in Europe with less population that the Byler “nation” on tumblr
7 notes · View notes
xtruss · 2 years
Text
Program Helps Congo Families Protect Endangered Gorillas
— The Associated Press | Friday April 22, 2022
Tumblr media
This photo provided by the Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund shows a Silverback and infant Grauer’s gorillas in Kahuzi Biega National Park in the Democratic Republic of Congo on April 17, 2014. On Friday, April 22, 2022, the nonprofit fund announced that more land in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo where Grauer's gorillas live will fall under a community-protection initiative. (Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund via AP)
Washington (AP) — Decades of conservation efforts have stabilized the population of endangered mountain gorillas in eastern Africa. But the number of Grauer’s gorillas — a less furry, lower elevation-dwelling animal — has declined, largely due to habitat loss and hunting.
On Friday, the nonprofit Dian Fossey Gorilla Fund announced that more land in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo where Grauer’s gorillas live will fall under a community-protection initiative.
The critically endangered species has lost an estimated 60% of its population in the past two decades, and an estimated 3,800 to 6,800 individuals remain.
Most Grauer’s gorillas now live outside national parks, and protecting them will be difficult in a region facing sustained human conflicts. Their rainforest homes are being cleared for agriculture and mining, and the gorillas are sometimes hunted for food or trapped by snares intended to catch other animals.
A 2016 law allows communities in Congo to apply for rights to manage their traditional lands. The Fossey Fund has helped communities in eastern Congo complete that paperwork and entered into agreements with families to provide assistance and training for the sustainable management of their lands.
Tumblr media
On Friday, it announced that 307 square miles (796 square kilometers) had been added to the program. The addition means 919 square miles (2,379 square kilometers) are now being watched over by about 20 families.
The community can decide what activities should be allowed on their lands, and to try to enforce those choices. The Fossey Fund provides education and funding.
Community members are trained and then hired “to conduct the science needed to monitor the biodiversity of the forest — biological inventories, gorilla tracking, plant biomass for estimating carbon capture,” said Urbain Ngobobo, director of the nonprofit’s Congo programs.
This model differs from the approach used to protect the mountain gorillas. They live almost exclusively within the boundaries of national parks in Rwanda, Uganda and Congo, allowing researchers to cooperate with park managers to protect the species.
Tumblr media
Most Grauer’s gorillas don’t live inside national parks — and it’s not feasible to expand the parks to fully cover their habitats.
“Grauer’s gorillas exist exclusively in a country that has suffered really extreme degrees of instability for decades,” said Richard Bergl, a primatologist and director of conservation at the North Carolina Zoo.
“When there is violence happening, it’s very challenging to maintain the infrastructure of a national park,” he said. “But the communities will be there regardless of political instability. If you have their support, you have a chance.”
Community interests vary, but in general there is an incentive to protect their lands from being pillaged by outsiders, whether they’re illegal mining operators or commercial hunters, said Dirck Byler, vice chair of the great apes specialist group for the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, the scientific body that designates species as endangered.
“Most of these communities want to maintain their forests as they’ve been in the past,” used for subsistence hunting and plant harvesting, said Byler, who has worked extensively in Congo.
Tumblr media
Community-based conservation schemes have been effective in slowing or reversing the decline of endangered species in other regions, such as the Nigerian mountains where cross river gorillas live and the savannah of northwestern Namibia where endangered rhinos live, Bergl said.
“The wildlife there would be gone if it weren’t for community involvement and management,” he said. “If we’re going to be successful, it’s going to be because of efforts to support the communities to manage their forests.”
2 notes · View notes
bountyofbeads · 4 years
Text
In China’s Crackdown on Muslims, Children Have Not Been Spared https://nyti.ms/37hWRCU
In China’s Crackdown on Muslims, Children Have Not Been Spared
In Xinjiang the authorities have separated nearly half a million children from their families, aiming to instill loyalty to China and the Communist Party.
By Amy Qin | Published Dec. 28, 2019 Updated 12:37 p.m. ET | New York Times | Posted December 28, 2019 |
HOTAN, China — The first grader was a good student and beloved by her classmates, but she was inconsolable, and it was no mystery to her teacher why.
“The most heartbreaking thing is that the girl is often slumped over on the table alone and crying,” he wrote on his blog. “When I asked around, I learned that it was because she missed her mother.”
The mother, he noted, had been sent to a detention camp for Muslim ethnic minorities. The girl’s father had passed away, he added. But instead of letting other relatives raise her, the authorities put her in a state-run boarding school — one of hundreds of such facilities that have opened in China’s far western Xinjiang region.
As many as a million ethnic Uighurs, Kazakhs and others have been sent to internment camps and prisons in Xinjiang over the past three years, an indiscriminate clampdown aimed at weakening the population’s devotion to Islam. Even as these mass detentions have provoked global outrage, though, the Chinese government is pressing ahead with a parallel effort targeting the region’s children.
Nearly a half million children have been separated from their families and placed in boarding schools so far, according to a planning document  published on a government website, and the ruling Communist Party has set a goal of operating one to two such schools in each of Xinjiang’s 800-plus townships by the end of next year.
The party has presented the schools as a way to fight poverty, arguing that they make it easier for children to attend classes if their parents live or work in remote areas or are unable to care for them. And it is true that many rural families are eager to send their children to these schools, especially when they are older.
But the schools are also designed to assimilate and indoctrinate children at an early age, away from the influence of their families, according to the planning document, published in 2017. Students are often forced to enroll because the authorities have detained their parents and other relatives, ordered them to take jobs far from home or judged them unfit guardians.
The schools are off limits to outsiders and tightly guarded, and it is difficult to interview residents in Xinjiang without putting them at risk of arrest. But a troubling picture of these institutions emerges from interviews with Uighur parents living in exile and a review of documents published online, including procurement records, government notices, state media reports and the blogs of teachers in the schools.
State media and official documents describe education as a key component of President Xi Jinping’s campaign to wipe out extremist violence in Xinjiang, a ruthless and far-reaching effort that also includes the mass internment camps and sweeping surveillance measures. The idea is to use the boarding schools as incubators of a new generation of Uighurs who are secular and more loyal to both the party and the nation.
“The long-term strategy is to conquer, to captivate, to win over the young generation from the beginning,” said Adrian Zenz, a researcher at the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation in Washington who has studied Chinese policies that break up Uighur families.
To carry out the assimilation campaign, the authorities in Xinjiang have recruited tens of thousands of teachers from across China, often Han Chinese, the nation’s dominant ethnic group. At the same time, prominent Uighur educators have been imprisoned and teachers have been warned they will be sent to the camps if they resist.
Thrust into a regimented environment and immersed in an unfamiliar culture, children in the boarding schools are only allowed visits with family once every week or two — a restriction intended to “break the impact of the religious atmosphere on children at home,” in the words of the 2017 policy document.
The campaign echoes past policies in Canada, the United States and  Australia that took indigenous children from their families and placed them in residential schools to forcibly assimilate them.
“The big difference in China is the scale and how systematic it is,” said Darren Byler, an anthropologist at the University of Colorado who studies Uighur culture and society.
Public discussion in China of the trauma inflicted on Uighur children by separating them from their families is rare. References on social media are usually quickly censored. Instead, the state-controlled news media focuses on the party’s goals in the region, where predominantly Muslim minorities make up more than half the population of 25 million.
Visiting a kindergarten near the frontier city of Kashgar this month, Chen Quanguo, the party’s top official in Xinjiang, urged teachers to ensure children learn to “love the party, love the motherland and love the people.”
INDOCTRINATION CHILDREN
Abdurahman Tohti left Xinjiang and immigrated to Turkey in 2013, leaving behind cotton farming to sell used cars in Istanbul. But when his wife and two young children returned to China for a visit a few years ago, they disappeared.
He heard that his wife was sent to prison, like many Uighurs who have traveled abroad and returned to China. His parents were detained too. The fate of his children, though, was a mystery.
Then in January, he spotted his 4-year-old son in a video on Chinese social media that had apparently been recorded by a teacher. The boy seemed to be at a state-run boarding school and was speaking Chinese, a language his family did not use.
Mr. Tohti, 30, said he was excited to see the child, and relieved he was safe — but also gripped by desperation.
“What I fear the most,” he said, “is that the Chinese government is teaching him to hate his parents and Uighur culture.”
Beijing has sought for decades to suppress Uighur resistance to Chinese rule in Xinjiang, in part by using schools in the region to indoctrinate Uighur children. Until recently, though, the government had allowed most classes to be taught in the Uighur language, partly because of a shortage of Chinese-speaking teachers.
Then, after a surge of antigovernment and anti-Chinese violence, including  ethnic riots in 2009 in Urumqi, the regional capital, and deadly attacks by Uighur militants in 2014, Mr. Xi ordered the party to take a harder line in Xinjiang, according to internal documents leaked to The New York Times earlier this year.
In December 2016, the party announced that the work of the region’s education bureau was entering a new phase. Schools were to become an extension of the security drive in Xinjiang, with a new emphasis on the Chinese language, patriotism and loyalty to the party.
In the 2017 policy document, posted on the education ministry’s website, officials from Xinjiang outlined their new priorities and ranked expansion of the boarding schools at the top.
Without specifying Islam by name, the document characterized religion as a pernicious influence on children, and said having students live at school would “reduce the shock of going back and forth between learning science in the classroom and listening to scripture at home.”
By early 2017, the document said, nearly 40 percent of all middle-school and elementary-school age children in Xinjiang — or about 497,800 students — were boarding in schools. At the time, the government was ramping up efforts to open boarding schools and add dorms to schools, and more recent reports suggest the push is continuing.
Chinese is also replacing Uighur as the main language of instruction in Xinjiang. Most elementary and middle school students are now taught in Chinese, up from just 38 percent three years ago. And thousands of new rural preschools have been built to expose minority children to Chinese at an earlier age, state media reported.
The government argues that teaching Chinese is critical to improving the economic prospects of minority children, and many Uighurs agree. But Uighur activists say the overall campaign amounts to an effort to erase what remains of their culture.
Several Uighurs living abroad said the government had put their children in boarding schools without their consent.
Mahmutjan Niyaz, 33, a Uighur businessman who moved to Istanbul in 2016, said his 5-year-old daughter was sent to one after his brother and sister-in-law, the girl’s guardians, were confined in an internment camp.
Other relatives could have cared for her but the authorities refused to let them. Now, Mr. Niyaz said, the school has changed the girl.
“Before, my daughter was playful and outgoing,” he said. “But after she went to the school, she looked very sad in the photos.”
‘KINDNESS STUDENTS’
In a dusty village near the ancient Silk Road city of Hotan in southern Xinjiang, nestled among fields of barren walnut trees and simple concrete homes, the elementary school stood out.
It was surrounded by a tall brick wall with two layers of barbed wire on top. Cameras were mounted on every corner. And at the entrance, a guard wearing a black helmet and a protective vest stood beside a metal detector.
It wasn’t always like this. Last year, officials converted the school in Kasipi village into a full-time boarding school.
Kang Jide, a Chinese language teacher at the school, described the frenzied process on his public blog on the Chinese social media platform WeChat: In just a few days, all the day students were transferred. Classrooms were rearranged. Bunk beds were set up. Then, 270 new children arrived, leaving the school with 430 boarders, each in the sixth grade or below.
Officials called them “kindness students,” referring to the party’s generosity in making special arrangements for their education.
The government says children in Xinjiang’s boarding schools are taught better hygiene and etiquette as well as Chinese and science skills that will help them succeed in modern China.
“My heart suddenly melted after seeing the splendid heartfelt smiles on the faces of these left-behind children,” said a retired official visiting a boarding elementary school in Lop County near Hotan, according to a state media report. He added that the party had given them “an environment to be carefree, study happily, and grow healthy and strong.”
But Mr. Kang wrote that being separated from their families took a toll on the children. Some never received visits from relatives, or remained on campus during the holidays, even after most teachers left. And his pupils often begged to use his phone to call their parents.
“Sometimes, when they hear the voice on the other end of the call, the children will start crying and they hide in the corner because they don’t want me to see,” he wrote.
“It’s not just the children,” he added. “The parents on the other end also miss their children of course, so much so that it breaks their hearts and they’re trembling.”
The internment camps, which the government describes as job training centers, have cast a shadow even on students who are not boarders. Before the conversion of the school, Mr. Kang posted a photo of a letter that an 8-year-old girl had written to her father, who had been sent to a camp.
“Daddy, where are you?” the girl wrote in an uneven scrawl. “Daddy, why don’t you come back?”
“I’m sorry, Daddy,” she continued. “You must study hard too.”
Nevertheless, Mr. Kang was generally supportive of the schools. On his blog, he described teaching Uighur students as an opportunity to “water the flowers of the motherland.”
“Kindness students” receive more attention and resources than day students. Boarding schools are required to offer psychological counseling, for example, and in Kasipi, the children were given a set of supplies that included textbooks, clothes and a red Young Pioneer scarf.
Learning Chinese was the priority, Mr. Kang wrote, though students were also immersed in traditional Chinese culture, including classical poetry, and taught songs praising the party.
On a recent visit to the school, children in red and blue uniforms could be seen playing in a yard beside buildings marked “cafeteria” and “student dormitory.” At the entrance, school officials refused to answer questions.
Tighter security has become the norm at schools in Xinjiang. In Hotan alone, more than a million dollars has been allocated in the past three years to buy surveillance and security equipment for schools, including helmets, shields and spiked batons, according to procurement records. At the entrance to one elementary school, a facial recognition system had been installed.
Mr. Kang recently wrote on his blog that he had moved on to a new job teaching in northern Xinjiang. Reached by telephone there, he declined to be interviewed. But before hanging up, he said his students in Kasipi had made rapid progress in learning Chinese.
“Every day I feel very fulfilled,” he said.
‘ENGINEERS OF THE HUMAN SOUL’
To carry out its campaign, the party needed not only new schools but also an army of teachers, an overhaul of the curriculum — and political discipline. Teachers suspected of dissent were punished, and textbooks were rewritten to weed out material deemed subversive.
“Teachers are the engineers of the human soul,” the education bureau of Urumqi recently wrote in an open letter, deploying a phrase first used by Stalin to describe writers and other cultural workers.
The party launched an intensive effort to recruit teachers for Xinjiang from across China. Last year, nearly 90,000 were brought in, chosen partly for their political reliability, officials said at a news conference this year. The influx amounted to about a fifth of Xinjiang’s teachers last year, according to government data.
The new recruits, often ethnic Han, and the teachers they joined, mostly Uighurs, were both warned to toe the line. Those who opposed the Chinese-language policy or resisted the new curriculum were labeled “two-faced” and punished.
The deputy secretary-general of the oasis town of Turpan, writing earlier this year, described such teachers as “scum of the Chinese people” and accused them of being “bewitched by extremist religious ideology.”
Teachers were urged to express their loyalty, and the public was urged to keep an eye on them. A sign outside a kindergarten in Hotan invited parents to report teachers who made “irresponsible remarks” or participated in unauthorized religious worship.
Officials in Xinjiang also spent two years inspecting and revising hundreds of textbooks and other teaching material, according to the 2017 policy document.
Some who helped the party write and edit the old textbooks ended up in prison, including Yalqun Rozi, a prominent scholar and literary critic who helped compile a set of textbooks on Uighur literature that were used for more than a decade.
Mr. Rozi was charged with attempted subversion and sentenced to 15 years in prison last year, according to his son, Kamaltürk Yalqun. Several other members of the committee that compiled the textbooks were arrested too, he said.
“Instead of welcoming the cultural diversity of Uighurs, China labeled it a malignant tumor,” said Mr. Yalqun, who lives in Philadelphia.
There is evidence that some Uighur children have been sent to boarding schools far from their homes.
Kalbinur Tursun, 36, entrusted five of her children to relatives when she left Xinjiang to give birth in Istanbul but has been unable to contact them for several years.
Last year, she saw her daughter Ayshe, then 6, in a video circulating on Chinese social media. It had been posted by a user who appeared to be a teacher at a school in Hotan — more than 300 miles away from their home in Kashgar.
“My children are so young, they just need their mother and father,” Ms. Tursun said, expressing concern about how the authorities were raising them. “I fear they will think that I’m the enemy — that they won’t accept me and will hate me.”
______
Fatima Er contributed reporting from Istanbul
2 notes · View notes
opedguy · 2 years
Text
Biden Declares Economic War on China
LOS ANGELES (OnlineColumnist.com), Dec. 17, 2021.--Signing the Forced Labor Prevention Act today, 79-year-old President Joe Biden declared economic war against China, restricting goods and service from Xinjiang, China where the U.S. alleges that China engages in genocide against the Muslim Uyghur population.  Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesman Wang Wenbin said Biden’s act “indicates that the U.S. has no scruples about smearing China by every means,” referring to U.S. allegations of genocide against the Muslim Uyghurs.  Wang blasted the U.S. government for interfering with global commerce, something bound to create a trade war far worse than anything under former President Donald Trump.  “The relevant actions seriously undermine the principles of market economy and international economic and trade rules, and serious damage the interests of Chinese institutions and enterprises,” said Wang, promising retaliation.
Since the March 18 Anchorage, Alaska summit, the Biden White House has been at odds with China about its treatment of Muslim Uyghurs.  China insists that there’s no genocide of Muslim Uyghurs, saying that re-education camps are designed to help train otherwise unskilled workers to fit into China’s industrial economy.  U.S. officials accuse Beijing of mounting a brutal campaign of forced labor, using Uyghurs as slaves for China’s public and private industries.  “China strongly deplores and rejects that and urges the U.S. to immediately correct its mistake. China will take all necessary measures to resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese institutions and enterprises,” Wang said in an ominous statement.  At the rate things are going, China could withdraw the U.S. ambassador, take other measures to punish the U.S. for applying economic sanctions against Beijing.
Under the Forced Labor Prevention Act, the U.S. government bans all goods and  service presumed to occur with forced labor, something China denies in the strongest possible terms.   Darren Byler, assistant professor in international studies at Canada’s Simon Fraser University, says that factory work has been associated with forced labor camps in Xinjiang province.  “They’re living in reality un-free conditions,” Byler said, insisting Xyghurs work against their will, often separated from their families and not allowed to freely practice their Muslim faith.  Announcing new sanctions on China’s Academy of Military Medical Sciences, the Commerce Department hopes to crack down on Beijing.  But in taking such aggressive actions, the Biden White House takes a huge risk of destabilizing the world order.  China’s politburo could concoct retaliatory sanctions on U.S. companies doing business in China.
Biden’s crusade against Russia and China has already backfired, alienating the European Union [EU] where the 27-nation economic bloc wants no part of the boycott on the Chinese Winter Games and new economic sanctions.  Joining the Commerce Department, the Treasury Department announced boycotts on DJI, the world’s largest drone manufacturer, and seven other countries involved in biometric surveillance used against Muslim Uyghurs and other groups.  Biden’s economic assault in Beijing runs the very real risk of retaliatory sanctions on U.S. companies, creating more problems in world supply chains, already impacting supply-and-demand, fueling the worst inflation in 39 years.  Making spectacle out of China comes with a cost to large numbers of U.S. business wholly dependent on Chinese manufacturing.  Biden hasn’t considered the consequences to his actions.
When it comes to alienating Russia and China, Biden deserves a medal, pushing the world closer to the brink.  Whether he knows it or not, the EU wants no part of following Biden’s lead, knowing the consequences of punishing China economically. When you consider the big picture, something Biden has a hard time doing, China is a far more valuable trading partner than the Muslim Uyghur population, a group that has morbid curiosity to the Western world, realizing that the ancient Turkic tribe falls today within China’s sovereignty.  Whatever problems China has with Muslim ethnic minorities in Western China, Biden isn’t about to change how Beijing cracks down on rebellious groups inside their borders.  China vowed “resolute countermeasures” to respond to Biden’s latest economic assault on China, but, more importantly, the global hazing from unsightly accusations.
Biden has done a masterful job of destroying U.S.-China and U.S.-Russian relations, all because his administration thinks the EU or ASEAN [Association of Southeast Asian Countries], backs the insanity of provoking China into a trade war or worse yet, a shooting war.  Whatever China does to contain uncooperative groups inside its borders, where does the U.S. think it has a right to humiliate a superpower with growing clout around the world?  Biden’s sanctions against China have no real backing in the EU or ASEAN countries, unwilling to rock the boat with the world’s most prolific manufacturing power.  Since taking office, Biden has pushed the world closer to the brink, launching a fake human rights crusade that panders to the liberal press and woke crowd looking to pick a fight with Russia and China.  Embarrassing China publicly won’t help Muslim Uyghur in Xinjiang Province.
About the Author
John M. Curtis writes politically neutral commentary analyzing spin in national and global news. He’s editor of OnlineColumnist.com and author of Dodging The Bullet and Operation Charisma.
0 notes
hf-rels390b · 4 years
Link
Amid growing concerns and the seriousness of the current COVID-19 pandemic, people in various communities across the country are adjusting to daily life as the reality of the new “normal” sets in. This article from NPR details how Amish farmers like Daniel Byler are adjusting their business and livelihood to the rapidly changing economic and political climate in the United States.
Amish communities practice religion and work and live according to traditional Amish beliefs. The Amish are considered Anabaptists and identify with many Christian beliefs. They live their life according to the Ordnung, an unwritten belief system that focuses on simplicity and humility within the tight-knit Amish community.
Prior to COVID-19, many Amish in the farming industry produced and sold their products to other Amish individuals within their communities. It is not uncommon for the Amish to focus the buying and selling of goods and services within their community, rather than supporting large businesses elsewhere. Although there is a considerable population of Amish who identify as liberal and non-traditional, the majority of Amish in the United States are very conservative – living their lives according to traditional beliefs. Is it possible that the current pandemic will impact groups like these and cause a shift in traditional practice and belief systems?
Due to the current pandemic, it is becoming more and more difficult for individuals across the country (and in other parts of the world) to support their families financially. While many Americans are out of work, or are able to work remotely entirely online, this is not the case for Amish communities. The rising demand for essential goods and services while businesses are forced to lose their doors has pushed many retailers to move business online or contactless to avoid spread of the virus. Churches and religious groups have been forced to cease meetings and congregations, while many groups also move services to an online or virtual format.
With the implementation of these changes becoming more commonplace in our country, what do people do when conforming to societal norms and practices does not agree with a belief system and way of life? This is the case for Amish communities today, whose business and way of life rely entirely on face-to-face human interaction. Is it possible that a crisis like Coronavirus could force some religious groups to re-evaluate age old practices and consider new ways of thinking and living? Like Daniel Byler, an Amish farmer in New York, many individuals are being forced to change their business model to adapt to the current state of our nation. For him, this means utilizing the internet and selling his products to non-Amish customers.
Although I am not a religious person, the Amish belief system and way of life is very admirable, albeit unique. When considering their religious beliefs, they align similarly to other Christian groups in the way of treating others with humility and respect and valuing community and helping your “neighbor.” I believe this pandemic will have an influence or hand in contributing to the positive change in the way we go about daily life. For religious groups this may mean implementing new age practices to benefit the greater good, for large businesses and the farming industry, it may bring new opportunity to light as society shifts its values in a new direction.
0 notes
itsfinancethings · 4 years
Link
(BEIJING) – When police arrested the middle-aged Uighur woman at the height of China’s coronavirus outbreak, she was crammed into a cell with dozens of other women in a detention center.
There, she said, she was forced to drink a medicine that made her feel weak and nauseous, guards watching as she gulped. She and the others also had to strip naked once a week and cover their faces as guards hosed them and their cells down with disinfectant “like firemen,” she said.
“It was scalding,” recounted the woman by phone from Xinjiang, declining to be named out of fear of retribution. “My hands were ruined, my skin was peeling.”
The government in China’s far northwest Xinjiang region is resorting to draconian measures to combat the coronavirus, including physically locking residents in homes, imposing quarantines of more than 40 days and arresting those who do not comply. Furthermore, in what experts call a breach of medical ethics, some residents are being coerced into swallowing traditional Chinese medicine, according to government notices, social media posts and interviews with three people in quarantine in Xinjiang.
There is a lack of rigorous clinical data showing traditional Chinese medicine works against the virus, and one of the herbal remedies used in Xinjiang, Qingfei Paidu, includes ingredients banned in Germany, Switzerland, the U.S. and other countries for high levels of toxins and carcinogens.
The latest grueling lockdown, now in its 45th day, comes in response to 826 cases reported in Xinjiang since mid-July, China’s largest caseload since the initial outbreak. But the Xinjiang lockdown is especially striking because of its severity, and because there hasn’t been a single new case of local transmission in over a week.
Harsh lockdowns have been imposed elsewhere in China, most notably in Wuhan in Hubei province, where the virus was first detected. But though Wuhan grappled with over 50,000 cases and Hubei with 68,000 in all, many more than in Xinjiang, residents there weren’t forced to take traditional medicine and were generally allowed outdoors within their compounds for exercise or grocery deliveries.
The response to an outbreak of more than 300 cases in Beijing in early June was milder still, with a few select neighborhoods locked down for a few weeks. In contrast, more than half of Xinjiang’s 25 million people are under a lockdown that extends hundreds of miles from the center of the outbreak in the capital, Urumqi, according to an AP review of government notices and state media reports.
Even as Wuhan and the rest of China has mostly returned to ordinary life, Xinjiang’s lockdown is backed by a vast surveillance apparatus that has turned the region into a digital police state. Over the past three years, Xinjiang authorities have swept a million or more Uighurs, Kazakhs and other ethnic minorities into various forms of detention, including extrajudicial internment camps, under a widespread security crackdown.
After being detained for over a month, the Uighur woman was released and locked into her home. Conditions are now better, she told the AP, but she is still under lockdown, despite regular tests showing she is free of the virus.
Once a day, she says, community workers force traditional medicine in white unmarked bottles on her, saying she’ll be detained if she doesn’t drink them. The AP saw photos of the bottles, which match those in images from another Xinjiang resident and others circulating on Chinese social media.
Authorities say the measures taken are for the well-being of all residents, though they haven’t commented on why they are harsher than those taken elsewhere. The Chinese government has struggled for decades to control Xinjiang, at times clashing violently with many of the region’s native Uighurs, who resent Beijing’s heavy-handed rule.
“The Xinjiang Autonomous Region upheld the principle of people and life first….and guaranteed the safety and health of local people of all ethnic groups,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Lijian said at a press briefing Friday.
Xinjiang authorities can carry out the harsh measures, experts say, because of its lavishly funded security apparatus, which by some estimates deploys the most police per capita of anywhere on the planet.
“Xinjiang is a police state, so it’s basically martial law,” says Darren Byler, a researcher on the Uighurs at the University of Colorado. “They think Uighurs can’t really police themselves, they have to be forced to comply in order for a quarantine to be effective.”
Not all the recent outbreak measures in Xinjiang are targeted at the Uighurs and other largely Muslim minorities. Some are being enforced on China’s majority Han residents in Xinjiang as well, though they are generally spared the extrajudicial detention used against minorities. This month, thousands of Xinjiang residents took to social media to complain about what they called excessive measures against the virus in posts that are often censored, some with images of residents handcuffed to railings and front doors sealed with metal bars.
One Han Chinese woman with the last name of Wang posted photos of herself drinking traditional Chinese medicine in front of a medical worker in full protective gear.
“Why are you forcing us to drink medicine when we’re not sick!” she asked in a Aug. 18 post that was swiftly deleted. “Who will take responsibility if there’s problems after drinking so much medicine? Why don’t we even have the right to protect our own health?”
A few days later she simply wrote: “I’ve lost all hope. I cry when I think about it.”
After the heavy criticism, the authorities eased some restrictions last week, now allowing some residents to walk in their compounds, and a limited few to leave the region after a bureaucratic approval process.
Wang did not respond to a request for interviews. But her account is in line with many others posted on social media, as well as those interviewed by the AP.
One Han businessman working between Urumqi and Beijing told the AP he was put in quarantine in mid-July. Despite having taken coronavirus tests five times and testing negative each time, he said, the authorities still haven’t let him out – not for so much as a walk. When he’s complained about his condition online, he said, he’s had his posts deleted and been told to stay silent.
“The most terrible thing is silence,” he wrote on Chinese social media site Weibo in mid-August. “After a long silence, you will fall into the abyss of hopelessness.”
“I’ve been in this room for so long, I don’t remember how long. I just want to forget,” he wrote again, days later. “I’m writing out my feelings to reassure myself I still exist. I fear I’ll be forgotten by the world.”
“I’m falling apart,” he told the AP more recently, declining to be named out of fear of retribution.
He, too, is being forced to take Chinese traditional medicine, he said, including liquid from the same unmarked white bottles as the Uighur woman. He is also forced to take Lianhua Qingwen, a herbal remedy seized regularly by U.S. Customs and Border patrol for violating FDA laws by falsely claiming to be effective against COVID-19.
Since the start of the outbreak, the Chinese government has pushed traditional medicine on its population. The remedies are touted by President Xi Jinping, China’s nationalist, authoritarian leader, who has advocated a revival of traditional Chinese culture. Although some state-backed doctors say they have conducted trials showing the medicine works against the virus, no rigorous clinical data supporting that claim has been published in international scientific journals.
“None of these medicines have been scientifically proven to be effective and safe,” said Fang Shimin, a former biochemist and writer known for his investigations of scientific fraud in China who now lives in the United States. “It’s unethical to force people, sick or healthy, to take unproven medicines.”
When the virus first started spreading, thousands flooded pharmacies in Hubei province searching for traditional remedies after state media promoted their effectiveness against the virus. Packs of pills were tucked into care packages sent to Chinese workers and students overseas, some emblazoned with the Chinese flag, others reading: “The motherland will forever firmly back you up”.
But the new measures in Xinjiang forcing some residents to take the medicine is unprecedented, experts say. The government says that the participation rate in traditional Chinese medicine treatment in the region has “reached 100%”, according to a state media report. When asked about resident complaints that they were being forced to take Chinese medicine, one local official said it was being done “according to expert opinion.”
“We’re helping resolve the problems of ordinary people,” said Liu Haijiang, the head of Dabancheng district in Urumqi, “like getting their children to school, delivering them medicine or getting them a doctor.”
With Xi’s ascent, critics of Chinese traditional medicine have fallen silent. In April, an influential Hubei doctor, Yu Xiangdong, was removed from a hospital management position for questioning the efficacy of the remedies, an acquittance confirmed. A government notice online said Yu “openly published inappropriate remarks slandering the nation’s epidemic prevention policy and traditional Chinese medicine.”
In March, the World Health Organization removed guidance on its site saying that herbal remedies were not effective against the virus and could be harmful, saying it was “too broad”. And in May, the Beijing city government announced a draft law that would criminalize speech “defaming or slandering” traditional Chinese medicine. Now, the government is pushing traditional Chinese remedies as a treatment for COVID-19 overseas, sending pills and specialists to countries such as Iran, Italy, and the Philippines.
Other leaders have also spearheaded unproven and potentially risky remedies – notably U.S. President Donald Trump, who stumped for the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, which can cause heart rhythm problems, despite no evidence that it’s effective against COVID-19. But China appears to be the first to force citizens – at least in Xinjiang – to take them.
The Chinese government’s push for traditional medicine is bolstering the fortunes of billionaires and padding state coffers. The family of Wu Yiling, the founder of the company that makes Lianhua Qingwen, has seen the value of their stake more than double in the past six months, netting them over a billion dollars. Also profiting: the Guangdong government, which owns a stake in Wu’s company.
“It’s a huge waste of money, these companies are making millions,” said a public health expert who works closely with the Chinese government, declining to be identified out of fear of retribution. “But then again – why not take it? There’s a placebo effect, it’s not that harmful. Why bother? There’s no point in fighting on this.”
Measures vary widely by city and neighborhood, and not all residents are taking the medication. The Uighur woman says that despite the threats against her, she’s flushing the liquid and pills down the toilet. A Han man whose parents are in Xinjiang told the AP that for them, the remedies are voluntary.
Though the measures are “extreme,” he says, they’re understandable.
“There’s no other way if the government wants to control this epidemic,” he said, declining to be named to avoid retribution. “We don’t want our outbreak to become like Europe or America.”
0 notes
newstechreviews · 4 years
Link
(BEIJING) – When police arrested the middle-aged Uighur woman at the height of China’s coronavirus outbreak, she was crammed into a cell with dozens of other women in a detention center.
There, she said, she was forced to drink a medicine that made her feel weak and nauseous, guards watching as she gulped. She and the others also had to strip naked once a week and cover their faces as guards hosed them and their cells down with disinfectant “like firemen,” she said.
“It was scalding,” recounted the woman by phone from Xinjiang, declining to be named out of fear of retribution. “My hands were ruined, my skin was peeling.”
The government in China’s far northwest Xinjiang region is resorting to draconian measures to combat the coronavirus, including physically locking residents in homes, imposing quarantines of more than 40 days and arresting those who do not comply. Furthermore, in what experts call a breach of medical ethics, some residents are being coerced into swallowing traditional Chinese medicine, according to government notices, social media posts and interviews with three people in quarantine in Xinjiang.
There is a lack of rigorous clinical data showing traditional Chinese medicine works against the virus, and one of the herbal remedies used in Xinjiang, Qingfei Paidu, includes ingredients banned in Germany, Switzerland, the U.S. and other countries for high levels of toxins and carcinogens.
The latest grueling lockdown, now in its 45th day, comes in response to 826 cases reported in Xinjiang since mid-July, China’s largest caseload since the initial outbreak. But the Xinjiang lockdown is especially striking because of its severity, and because there hasn’t been a single new case of local transmission in over a week.
Harsh lockdowns have been imposed elsewhere in China, most notably in Wuhan in Hubei province, where the virus was first detected. But though Wuhan grappled with over 50,000 cases and Hubei with 68,000 in all, many more than in Xinjiang, residents there weren’t forced to take traditional medicine and were generally allowed outdoors within their compounds for exercise or grocery deliveries.
The response to an outbreak of more than 300 cases in Beijing in early June was milder still, with a few select neighborhoods locked down for a few weeks. In contrast, more than half of Xinjiang’s 25 million people are under a lockdown that extends hundreds of miles from the center of the outbreak in the capital, Urumqi, according to an AP review of government notices and state media reports.
Even as Wuhan and the rest of China has mostly returned to ordinary life, Xinjiang’s lockdown is backed by a vast surveillance apparatus that has turned the region into a digital police state. Over the past three years, Xinjiang authorities have swept a million or more Uighurs, Kazakhs and other ethnic minorities into various forms of detention, including extrajudicial internment camps, under a widespread security crackdown.
After being detained for over a month, the Uighur woman was released and locked into her home. Conditions are now better, she told the AP, but she is still under lockdown, despite regular tests showing she is free of the virus.
Once a day, she says, community workers force traditional medicine in white unmarked bottles on her, saying she’ll be detained if she doesn’t drink them. The AP saw photos of the bottles, which match those in images from another Xinjiang resident and others circulating on Chinese social media.
Authorities say the measures taken are for the well-being of all residents, though they haven’t commented on why they are harsher than those taken elsewhere. The Chinese government has struggled for decades to control Xinjiang, at times clashing violently with many of the region’s native Uighurs, who resent Beijing’s heavy-handed rule.
“The Xinjiang Autonomous Region upheld the principle of people and life first….and guaranteed the safety and health of local people of all ethnic groups,” Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Zhao Lijian said at a press briefing Friday.
Xinjiang authorities can carry out the harsh measures, experts say, because of its lavishly funded security apparatus, which by some estimates deploys the most police per capita of anywhere on the planet.
“Xinjiang is a police state, so it’s basically martial law,” says Darren Byler, a researcher on the Uighurs at the University of Colorado. “They think Uighurs can’t really police themselves, they have to be forced to comply in order for a quarantine to be effective.”
Not all the recent outbreak measures in Xinjiang are targeted at the Uighurs and other largely Muslim minorities. Some are being enforced on China’s majority Han residents in Xinjiang as well, though they are generally spared the extrajudicial detention used against minorities. This month, thousands of Xinjiang residents took to social media to complain about what they called excessive measures against the virus in posts that are often censored, some with images of residents handcuffed to railings and front doors sealed with metal bars.
One Han Chinese woman with the last name of Wang posted photos of herself drinking traditional Chinese medicine in front of a medical worker in full protective gear.
“Why are you forcing us to drink medicine when we’re not sick!” she asked in a Aug. 18 post that was swiftly deleted. “Who will take responsibility if there’s problems after drinking so much medicine? Why don’t we even have the right to protect our own health?”
A few days later she simply wrote: “I’ve lost all hope. I cry when I think about it.”
After the heavy criticism, the authorities eased some restrictions last week, now allowing some residents to walk in their compounds, and a limited few to leave the region after a bureaucratic approval process.
Wang did not respond to a request for interviews. But her account is in line with many others posted on social media, as well as those interviewed by the AP.
One Han businessman working between Urumqi and Beijing told the AP he was put in quarantine in mid-July. Despite having taken coronavirus tests five times and testing negative each time, he said, the authorities still haven’t let him out – not for so much as a walk. When he’s complained about his condition online, he said, he’s had his posts deleted and been told to stay silent.
“The most terrible thing is silence,” he wrote on Chinese social media site Weibo in mid-August. “After a long silence, you will fall into the abyss of hopelessness.”
“I’ve been in this room for so long, I don’t remember how long. I just want to forget,” he wrote again, days later. “I’m writing out my feelings to reassure myself I still exist. I fear I’ll be forgotten by the world.”
“I’m falling apart,” he told the AP more recently, declining to be named out of fear of retribution.
He, too, is being forced to take Chinese traditional medicine, he said, including liquid from the same unmarked white bottles as the Uighur woman. He is also forced to take Lianhua Qingwen, a herbal remedy seized regularly by U.S. Customs and Border patrol for violating FDA laws by falsely claiming to be effective against COVID-19.
Since the start of the outbreak, the Chinese government has pushed traditional medicine on its population. The remedies are touted by President Xi Jinping, China’s nationalist, authoritarian leader, who has advocated a revival of traditional Chinese culture. Although some state-backed doctors say they have conducted trials showing the medicine works against the virus, no rigorous clinical data supporting that claim has been published in international scientific journals.
“None of these medicines have been scientifically proven to be effective and safe,” said Fang Shimin, a former biochemist and writer known for his investigations of scientific fraud in China who now lives in the United States. “It’s unethical to force people, sick or healthy, to take unproven medicines.”
When the virus first started spreading, thousands flooded pharmacies in Hubei province searching for traditional remedies after state media promoted their effectiveness against the virus. Packs of pills were tucked into care packages sent to Chinese workers and students overseas, some emblazoned with the Chinese flag, others reading: “The motherland will forever firmly back you up”.
But the new measures in Xinjiang forcing some residents to take the medicine is unprecedented, experts say. The government says that the participation rate in traditional Chinese medicine treatment in the region has “reached 100%”, according to a state media report. When asked about resident complaints that they were being forced to take Chinese medicine, one local official said it was being done “according to expert opinion.”
“We’re helping resolve the problems of ordinary people,” said Liu Haijiang, the head of Dabancheng district in Urumqi, “like getting their children to school, delivering them medicine or getting them a doctor.”
With Xi’s ascent, critics of Chinese traditional medicine have fallen silent. In April, an influential Hubei doctor, Yu Xiangdong, was removed from a hospital management position for questioning the efficacy of the remedies, an acquittance confirmed. A government notice online said Yu “openly published inappropriate remarks slandering the nation’s epidemic prevention policy and traditional Chinese medicine.”
In March, the World Health Organization removed guidance on its site saying that herbal remedies were not effective against the virus and could be harmful, saying it was “too broad”. And in May, the Beijing city government announced a draft law that would criminalize speech “defaming or slandering” traditional Chinese medicine. Now, the government is pushing traditional Chinese remedies as a treatment for COVID-19 overseas, sending pills and specialists to countries such as Iran, Italy, and the Philippines.
Other leaders have also spearheaded unproven and potentially risky remedies – notably U.S. President Donald Trump, who stumped for the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, which can cause heart rhythm problems, despite no evidence that it’s effective against COVID-19. But China appears to be the first to force citizens – at least in Xinjiang – to take them.
The Chinese government’s push for traditional medicine is bolstering the fortunes of billionaires and padding state coffers. The family of Wu Yiling, the founder of the company that makes Lianhua Qingwen, has seen the value of their stake more than double in the past six months, netting them over a billion dollars. Also profiting: the Guangdong government, which owns a stake in Wu’s company.
“It’s a huge waste of money, these companies are making millions,” said a public health expert who works closely with the Chinese government, declining to be identified out of fear of retribution. “But then again – why not take it? There’s a placebo effect, it’s not that harmful. Why bother? There’s no point in fighting on this.”
Measures vary widely by city and neighborhood, and not all residents are taking the medication. The Uighur woman says that despite the threats against her, she’s flushing the liquid and pills down the toilet. A Han man whose parents are in Xinjiang told the AP that for them, the remedies are voluntary.
Though the measures are “extreme,” he says, they’re understandable.
“There’s no other way if the government wants to control this epidemic,” he said, declining to be named to avoid retribution. “We don’t want our outbreak to become like Europe or America.”
0 notes
Text
HOLY SHIIIFFUUUCKING
Tumblr media
WE WERE AT 197K 10 MINUTES AGO WHAT THE ACTUAL HELL
IT HAS BEEN LESS THAN A MONTH SINCE WE HIT 100K. A!!! FUCKIN!!! MONTH!!!
92 notes · View notes
ladystylestores · 4 years
Text
Calls for UN probe of China forced birth control on Uighurs
Politicians around the world have called for a United Nations probe into a Chinese government birth control campaign targeting largely Muslim minorities in the far western region of Xinjiang, even as Beijing said it treats all ethnicities equally under the law.
They were referring to an Associated Press investigation published this week that found the Chinese government is taking draconian measures to slash birth rates among Uighurs and other minorities, while encouraging some of the country’s Han majority to have more children. The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, a group of European, Australian, North American, and Japanese politicians from across the political spectrum, demanded an independent U.N. investigation.
“The world cannot remain silent in the face of unfolding atrocities,” the group said in a statement.
The AP found that the Chinese government regularly subjects minority women in Xinjiang to pregnancy checks and forces intrauterine devices, sterilization and even abortion on hundreds of thousands. New research obtained by The Associated Press in advance of publication by China scholar Adrian Zenz also showed that the hundreds of millions of dollars the government pours into birth control has transformed Xinjiang from one of China’s fastest-growing regions to among its slowest in just a few years.
The AP found that the population control measures are backed by mass detention both as a threat and as a punishment for failure to comply. Having too many children is a major reason people are sent to detention camps, documents and interviews show, with the parents of three or more ripped away from their families unless they can pay huge fines.
The U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom called for a U.N. and State Department investigation, saying the Chinese government’s birth control campaign “might meet the legal criteria for genocide.” According to a U.N. convention, ��imposing measures intended to prevent births” with “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group” is considered evidence of genocide. The last colonial governor of Hong Kong, Chris Patten, told Bloomberg Television that the birth control campaign was “arguably something that comes within the terms of the UN views on sorts of genocide.”
Story continues
The U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee called the forced birth control “beyond deplorable,” and said that “a nation that treats its own people this way should never be considered a great power.” U.S. senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Kamala Harris wrote a letter urging the Trump administration to respond to an “alarming” AP investigation, and U.S. Senator Marco Rubio and Representative Ro Khanna also called for action.
U.S. President Donald Trump told China President Xi Jinping he was right to build detention camps to house hundreds of thousands of ethnic minorities, according to a new book by former national security adviser John Bolton. However, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the reports of forced birth control for minorities were “shocking” and “disturbing” in a statement Monday.
“We call on the Chinese Communist Party to immediately end these horrific practices,” he said.
Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian fired back on Tuesday by calling Pompeo “a brazen liar,” saying the Uighur population had more than doubled since 1978 in response to criticism of Xinjiang’s birth control policies.
“If Mr. Pompeo is telling the truth, how can he explain the big increase in the Uighur population?” Zhao asked.
For decades, Xinjiang’s population grew quickly, as minorities enjoyed laxer birth control restrictions than Han Chinese. But in just three years, new measures have caused the birth rate in Xinjiang’s Uighur-majority areas to plunge, and it is now well under the national average.
Zhao also said the American government had been responsible for “genocide, racial segregation and assimilation policies” on Native Americans. on them.” University of Colorado researcher Darren Byler said the Chinese state-orchestrated assault on Xinjiang’s minorities does echo past birth control programs.
“It recalls the American eugenics movement which targeted Native and African Americans up until the 1970s,” he said. “China’s public health authorities are conducting a mass experiment in targeted genetic engineering on Turkic Muslim populations.”
In response to the AP story, which he called “fake news,” Zhao said the government treats all ethnicities equally and protects their legal rights. Chinese officials have said in the past that the new measures are merely meant to be fair, with the law now allowing minorities and China’s Han majority the same number of children.
However, the AP’s reporting found that while equal on paper, in practice Han Chinese are largely spared the abortions, sterilizations, IUD insertions and detentions for having too many children that are forced on Xinjiang’s other ethnicities, interviews and data show. Some rural minorities are punished even for having the three children allowed by the law.
British members of Parliament debated Xinjiang in the House of Commons on Monday, with both Labor and Conservative politicians urging the U.K. Foreign Ministry to adopt a stronger stance against the Chinese government. Nigel Adams, the British Minister of State for Asia, said the reports added to the U.K.’s “concern about the human rights situation in Xinjiang” and that it will be “considering this report very carefully.” Australian Foreign Minister Marise Payne also told Australian broadcaster SBS that the reports “further compounded” their concerns.
Bill Browder, CEO of investment fund Hermitage Capital Management and brainchild of the Magnitsky Act, asked the U.S. government to level sanctions against Chinese officials, calling the birth control campaign part of a broader assault he called “vile persecution.”
Source link
قالب وردپرس
from World Wide News https://ift.tt/3eNJ4rN
0 notes
whittlebaggett8 · 5 years
Text
Even China’s ‘Model’ Uyghurs Aren’t Safe
When she received news very last November that her mother has been despatched to a detention camp, Uyghur refugee Zulhumar Isaac was at a decline for phrases. Soon soon after, her father disappeared far too.
Initial came disbelief, then anger – that even a household like hers, which had taken pains to assimilate into the Han Chinese lifestyle, was not spared by the authorities’ Xinjiang marketing campaign.
“All our lives we have lived as ‘model Chinese citizens.’ We analyzed Mandarin, my mother was a civil servant for decades, and I’d fallen in like with and got married to a Han Chinese person,” lamented Isaac, who is now dwelling in exile in Sweden. “And still it has occurred to us. Why?”
Experiencing this article? Simply click here to subscribe for total access. Just $5 a month.
Some 1 million Muslims have been detained in China’s far western area of Xinjiang, in what the authorities simply call “preventive counterterrorism and de-extremism perform.”
Detainees are created to review Mandarin, recite Chinese propaganda, and mirror on earlier “political errors,” among the other matters.
In a issue of months, Beijing’s rhetoric has shifted sharply, from outright denial that the detention centers exist, to normalizing them as camps that provide free vocational schooling. In a visit hosted for international diplomats previous month, Chinese officials mentioned its efforts in Xinjiang should be applauded.
Above 45 per cent of folks residing in Xinjiang – which was declared an autonomous location in 1955 – are Uyghurs.
The crackdown on Xinjiang has collected tempo in the previous a few yrs, major also to a spike in protection spending, the destruction of mosques, and a ban on the Uyghur language at colleges.
Accounts like Zulhumar Isaac’s, however, complicates the Chinese government’s “re-education” narrative.
“Although ethnically Uyghur, we have under no circumstances rather recognized as regular Uyghurs, nor followed the cultural tactics,” reported Isaac, 31. “But mainly because of that, we grew up like misfits each ways,” she added, recalling how an elementary faculty classmate was recommended by her mother to refrain from speaking to Uyghurs.
Halmurat Mari Uyghur’s dad and mom faced a comparable predicament – “detained even while they really should be the most honest men,” in the phrases of the 33-12 months-old. Uyghur’s mom was a journalist for a newspaper supported by the Chinese Communist Occasion, though his father labored for the nearby govt.
“I really do not know what the state is seriously making an attempt to do, but I believe that they truly feel threatened from inside China, and ethnic minorities are a single of these threats,” reported Uyghur, who life in Finland with his spouse and two kids.
“It doesn’t subject if you are Uyghur and American, Uyghur and a public servant, or a Uyghur [who] speaks Mandarin as your very first language. As very long as you a Uyghur, you will be targeted.”
Uyghur’s mom and father have been released in December, following remaining detained for 11 and 18 months, respectively. Uyghur currently spends the bulk of his time advocating for the group through Uyghur Assist, a non-govt firm he established in July 2018.
Alfred Uyghur, whose parents were robust proponents of a Mandarin-medium schooling, also wound up as targets in the crackdown. Alfred misplaced make contact with with them 3 yrs back, shortly following he began university schooling in the United States. He not too long ago identified out that his mom had been detained in a camp in 2017, even though his father was sentenced to 11 several years in jail for unexplained causes.
“Both my parents ended up school graduates. My father, specifically, saw the relevance of finding out Mandarin and employed a Mandarin tutor for us,” mentioned the 21-year-previous.
Dr. Timothy Grose, who researches Uyghur ethno-national identification, reported participation in the “Xinjiang Class” – a system that resources middle faculty-aged students from Xinjiang, primarily ethnic Uyghurs, to show up at college in predominantly Han populated metropolitan areas – does not ensure that the university student or his family will be spared “re-schooling.”
“In truth, a handful of of my informants and close friends have been detained. But yes, this condition raises serious issues about the plan as very well as doubts about the Chinese Communist Party’s rationalization, or justification, for the camps,” explained Grose, an assistant professor of China Experiments at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technological know-how in Terre Haute, Indiana. “In other text, in any other case upstanding citizens who have been successful in ‘Chinese’ modern society are getting detained simply just since of their ethno-spiritual identities,” he claimed.
The Xinjiang Class software, present through jap China, presently enrolls pretty much 10,000 college students every 12 months, most of whom are Uyghurs. These students spend 4 decades discovering and perfecting the Mandarin language and using lessons on political ideology.
An additional Uyghur, who participated in the Xinjiang Class, recalled how complicated it was – ironically, he reported – for Uyghurs to enroll into a Mandarin-medium school. In 2017, authorities banned the use of the Uyghur language at all education stages, warning that these who violate the purchase will be seriously punished.
Check out as the Uyghurs might to assimilate into the mainstream, nonetheless, their presence was not usually embraced by the Han Chinese.
“Whoever our instructors named as a achievement tale to encourage us was usually an individual excellent at math and fluent in Chinese. So currently being fluent in Chinese was practically all my classmates’ aspiration,” stated the Uyghur gentleman, who wanted to remain nameless. He is at this time residing in exile in the Netherlands.
“When I was picked for Xinjiang Course, my parents were being so very pleased and I was psyched as perfectly. But even although I mastered Mandarin, integrating into the mainstream has been hard owing to numerous kinds of discrimination,” he additional.
A 27-12 months-old Uyghur who preferred only to be known as Nigar recalls becoming singled out by professors in the course of her school many years in Shanghai’s Fudan College – several many years right after the July 2009 riots in Urumqi, Xinjiang’s funds town – because she appeared various from the normal Han student.
“I remember a finance professor discussing how to deal with Xinjiang, referring it to a location with undeveloped men and women, and suggesting that it be turned into a on line casino centre,” reported Nigar, who is now doing the job in Washington D.C. “Often when instructors make inappropriate or discriminatory remarks, pupils can report these to the school’s administration. But when I make these experiences, no one appeared to care.”
Nigar, who pursued graduate research in political science in the United States, now maintains small get hold of with her mother and brother back in Xinjiang for anxiety of having them into issues. “One of my best mates in faculty went property and we lost contact. I assume my presence here in the U.S. might be influencing her do the job,” she stated.
Anthropologist Darren Byler, whose study focuses on Uyghur dispossession, claimed the present-day crackdown may possibly have solid a sense of unity among the Mandarin-speaking Uyghurs – who frequently considered them selves “upper class” – and the functioning-class Uyghur neighborhood.
“The Uyghurs who spoke Mandarin normally had better enterprise connections and far more prosperity, and therefore regarded as the other Uyghurs ‘backward.’ Now the resentment is beginning to shift since Mandarin-speaking Uyghurs too are being targeted by the marketing campaign,” he stated. “But most likely this has took place also late.”
Byler, who lectures at the University of Washington’s anthropology department, sees the crackdown as the Chinese government’s attempt to eradicate all exceptional aspects of the Uyghur identity. “I am not hopeful that the identity will proceed to survive. I believe children of the long term generations, particularly, may possibly shed contact with their Uyghur heritage or just see it as backward, or lacking,” he claimed.
Kelly Ng is a freelance journalist learning documentary in New York Metropolis.
The post Even China’s ‘Model’ Uyghurs Aren’t Safe appeared first on Defence Online.
from WordPress https://defenceonline.com/2019/03/14/even-chinas-model-uyghurs-arent-safe/
0 notes
stormdoors78476 · 7 years
Text
Presidential Approval Ratings Are More Partisan Than Ever
President Trump’s first-quarter approval ratings set a depressing new record. Forty percent of Americans say they doubt anything could change their minds about the president. And support for marijuana legalization is, well, higher than ever. This is HuffPollster for Friday, April 21, 2017.
GALLUP GIVES TRUMP HISTORICALLY LOW FIRST-QUARTER RATINGS - HuffPollster: “President Donald Trump received substantially worse ratings for his initial months in office than any other president elected to his first term since World War II, according to Gallup. Even presidents who’ve gone on to be unpopular generally enjoyed high ratings during their first months in office. But Trump’s average rating since Inauguration Day is just 41 percent, Gallup finds, making him the only president in their polling history to fall short of majority approval during his first quarter. Former President Bill Clinton, the next-lowest ranked, had an average approval rating of 55 percent for that time period, while former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush enjoyed first quarter ratings of 63 percent and 58 percent, respectively.” [HuffPost, Gallup]
An increasing divide along partisan lines - More from HuffPollster: “What sets Trump apart isn’t a lack of support from his own party. About 87 percent of Republicans approve of his performance, several points above the average for previous presidents and similar to the numbers Obama and Bush saw at this point in their presidencies. Rather, Trump’s ratings reflect the near-complete absence of support from Democrats, just 9 percent of whom approve of his performance so far. Americans’ willingness to support a president across the aisle has shrunk dramatically in recent years. This early in their terms, former Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter all saw majority support from their opposing party, a feat that seems almost unimaginable in the modern political environment. But Obama still managed to garner the approval of about 30 percent of Republicans during the first quarter of 2009, while Bush saw a 32 percent rating among Democrats in the first quarter of 2001.” Another way of looking at it: Republicans are 78 points more likely than Democrats to approve of Trump’s job performance. Until Clinton took office, that gap was never above 50 points.
4 IN 10 AMERICANS SAY THERE’S NOTHING TRUMP CAN DO TO CHANGE THEIR MINDS ABOUT HIM - HuffPollster on a new HuffPost/YouGov poll: “Sixty-three percent of Americans who currently disapprove of Trump say there’s almost nothing the president can do to win their approval. Conversely, a relatively modest 24 percent of Americans who currently approve of Trump say there’s almost nothing he could do to lose their approval. That adds up to a combined 40 percent of the population saying that at just over four months into Trump’s presidency, there’s little he can do to change their minds about his performance ― 10 percent because they’ll never stop liking him, and 30 percent because they’ll never start….Among Americans who disapprove of Trump overall, 64 percent say Trump hasn’t done anything they approve of, according to the HuffPost/YouGov survey, while just 24 percent say that he’s earned their approval for some actions. Fifty-one percent of Americans who currently approve of Trump say he’s done nothing so far to earn their disapproval, with 31 percent saying he’s done at least something they disapprove of.” [HuffPost]
Trump’s “reluctant” supporters are largely still with him - Clare Malone, on a FiveThirtyEight/SurveyMonkey poll: “About 15 percent of Trump voters said they weren’t excited to cast a ballot for him. This group differs demographically and has different policy priorities from the rest of the Trump cohort….The biggest difference between the two groups is education level: 37 percent of reluctant Trumpers had at least a college degree, while only 25 percent of other Trump supporters had a college or postgraduate degree….But as of right now, reluctant Trump voters approve of Trump, and not even reluctantly, though at nowhere near the same levels of other Trump voters: 74 percent of reluctant Trumpers approved of the president, while a whopping 97 percent of more enthusiastic Trump voters approved of him….But there are danger signs for Trump and the GOP: Nearly 80 percent of Trump’s enthusiastic voters said they approved of his budget proposal, which essentially serves as an outline of the White House’s priorities. Only about half of reluctant Trump voters approved of the budget.” [538]
[INSERT YOUR OWN “RECORD HIGH” JOKE HERE] - Nick Wing: “Sixty-one percent of Americans are now in favor of legalizing marijuana for recreational use, according to a CBS News poll released Thursday. That’s the highest mark this particular poll has ever found, and it’s not an outlier. Similar surveys taken over the past year have shown that public support for legal cannabis is higher now than it has ever been before. Widespread acceptance of legalization ― itself a rejection of the longstanding federal prohibition on marijuana ― is a relatively new phenomenon in the U.S. The nation first reached majority support for legalizing weed in 2013, when polls showed slightly more than 50 percent of Americans favoring the move. Although approval fluctuated somewhat after that, a number of surveys conducted over the past year have shown support for legal recreational marijuana crossing the 60 percent threshold, with fewer and fewer Americans expressing opposition.” [HuffPost, CBS]
HUFFPOLLSTER VIA EMAIL! - You can receive this update every Tuesday and Friday morning via email! Just click here, enter your email address, and click “sign up.” That’s all there is to it (and you can unsubscribe anytime).
FRIDAY’S ‘OUTLIERS’ - Links to the best of news at the intersection of polling, politics and political data:
-Quinnipiac charts President Trump’s approval during his first 100 days in office. [Quinnipiac]
-Morning Consult asks voters to grade Trump’s job performance. [Morning Consult]
-The Chicago Council compares Trump’s foreign policies against public opinion. [Chicago Council]
-Harry Enten draws five takeaways from the GA-06 special election. [538]
-David Wasserman argues that the GA-06 election results have been blown out of proportion. [Cook Political]
-David Byler takes an early look at Virginia’s 2017 gubernatorial race. [RCP]
-Geoffrey Skelley and Kyle Kondik lay out initial 2018 gubernatorial race ratings. [Sabato’s Crystal Ball]
-Chuck Todd, Mark Murray and Carrie Dann argue that Democrats’ path to a House majority runs through the Sunbelt. [NBC]
-D’Vera Cohn explores a potential change in how the Census asks about race [Pew]
-Christopher Ingraham highlights a startling chart from the Office of Government Ethics. [WashPost]
-The Economist raises concerns about the consistency of French election polling. [The Economist]
-GOP pollsters Neil Newhouse and Erin Murphy propose an alternate question to measure support for Trump. [POS (R)]
-Marist finds that most football fans don’t want their favorite team to draft domestic abusers. [Marist]
-- This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
from DIYS http://ift.tt/2oYjTK0
0 notes
bountyofbeads · 5 years
Text
China’s Detention Camps for Muslims Turn to Forced Labor https://nyti.ms/2QUZ3vh
China’s Detention Camps for Muslims Turn to Forced Labor
Chinese state television showed Muslims attending classes on how to be law-abiding citizens. Evidence is emerging that detainees are also being forced to take jobs in new factories.
By Chris Buckley and Austin Ramzy | Dec. 16, 2018 | New York Times | Posted December 16, 2018 |
KASHGAR, China — Muslim inmates from internment camps in far western China hunched over sewing machines, in row after row. They were among hundreds of thousands who had been detained and spent month after month renouncing their religious convictions. Now the government was showing them on television as models of repentance, earning good pay — and political salvation — as factory workers.
China’s ruling Communist Party has said in a surge of upbeat propaganda that a sprawling network of camps in the Xinjiang region is providing job training and putting detainees on production lines for their own good, offering an escape from poverty, backwardness and the temptations of radical Islam.
But mounting evidence suggests a system of forced labor is emerging from the camps, a development likely to intensify international condemnation of China’s drastic efforts to control and indoctrinate a Muslim ethnic minority population of more than 12 million in Xinjiang.
Accounts from the region, satellite images and previously unreported official documents indicate that growing numbers of detainees are being sent to new factories, built inside or near the camps, where inmates have little choice but to accept jobs and follow orders.
“These people who are detained provide free or low-cost forced labor for these factories,” said Mehmet Volkan Kasikci, a researcher in Turkey who has collected accounts of inmates in the factories by interviewing relatives who have left China. “Stories continue to come to me,” he said.
China has defied an international outcry against the sweeping internment program in Xinjiang, which holds Muslims and forces them to renounce religious piety and pledge loyalty to the party. The emerging labor program underlines the government’s determination to continue operating the camps despite calls from United Nations human rights officials, the United States and other governments to close them.
The program aims to transform scattered Uighurs, Kazakhs and other ethnic minorities — many of them farmers, shopkeepers and tradespeople — into a disciplined, Chinese-speaking industrial work force, loyal to the Communist Party and factory bosses, according to official plans published online.
These documents describe the camps as vocational training centers and do not specify whether inmates are required to accept assignments to factories or other jobs. But pervasive restrictions on the movement and employment of Muslim minorities in Xinjiang, as well as a government effort to persuade businesses to open factories around the camps, suggest that they have little choice.
Independent accounts from inmates who have worked in the factories are rare. The police block attempts to get near the camps and closely monitor foreign journalists who travel to Xinjiang, making it all but impossible to conduct interviews in the region. And most Uighurs who have fled Xinjiang did so before the factory program grew in recent months.
But Serikzhan Bilash, a founder of Atajurt Kazakh Human Rights, an organization in Kazakhstan that helps ethnic Kazakhs who have left neighboring Xinjiang, said he had interviewed relatives of 10 inmates in recent months who had told their families that they were made to work in factories after undergoing indoctrination in the camps.
They mostly made clothes, and they called their employers “black factories,” because of the low wages and tough conditions, he said.
Mr. Kasikci also described several cases based on interviews with family members: Sofiya Tolybaiqyzy, who was sent from a camp to work in a carpet factory. Abil Amantai, 37, who was put in a camp a year ago and told relatives he was working in a textile factory for $95 a month. Nural Razila, 25, who had studied oil drilling but after a year in a camp was sent to a new textile factory nearby.
“It’s not as though they have a choice of whether they get to work in a factory, or what factory they are assigned to,” said Darren Byler, a lecturer at the University of Washington who studies Xinjiang and visited the region in April.
He said it was safe to conclude that hundreds of thousands of detainees could be compelled to work in factories if the program were put in place at all of the region’s internment camps.
The Xinjiang government did not respond to faxed questions about the factories, nor did the State Council Information Office, the central government agency that answers reporters’ questions.
The documents detail plans for inmates, even those formally released from the camps, to take jobs at factories that work closely with the camps to continue to monitor and control them. The socks, suits, skirts and other goods made by these laborers would be sold in Chinese stores and could trickle into overseas markets.
Kashgar, an ancient, predominantly Uighur area of southern Xinjiang that is a focus of the program, reported that in 2018 alone it aimed to send 100,000 inmates who had been through the “vocational training centers” to work in factories, according to a plan issued in August.
That figure may be an ambitious political goal rather than a realistic target. But it suggests how many Uighurs and other Muslim ethnic minorities may be held in the camps and sent to factories. Scholars have estimated that as many as one million people have been detained. The Chinese government has not issued or confirmed any figures.
“I don’t see China yielding an inch on Xinjiang,” said John Kamm, the founder of the Dui Hua Foundation, a San Francisco-based group that lobbies China on human rights issues. “Now it seems we have entrepreneurs coming in and taking advantage of the situation.”
The evolution of the Xinjiang camps echoes China’s “re-education through labor” system, where citizens once were sent without trial to toil for years. China abolished “re-education through labor” five years ago, but Xinjiang appears to be creating a new version.
Retailers in the United States and other countries should guard against buying goods made by workers from the Xinjiang camps, which could violate laws banning imports produced by prison or forced labor, Mr. Kamm said.
While the bulk of clothes and other textile goods manufactured in Xinjiang ends up in domestic and Central Asian markets, some makes its way to the United States and Europe.
Badger Sportswear, a company based in North Carolina, last month received a container of polyester knitted T-shirts from Hetian Taida, a company in Xinjiang that was shown on a prime-time state television broadcast promoting the camps.
The program showed workers at a Hetian Taida plant, including a woman who was described as a former camp inmate. But the small factory did not appear to be on a camp site, and it is unclear whether it made the T-shirts sent to North Carolina.
Ginny Gasswint, a Badger Sportswear executive, said the company had ordered a small amount of products from Xinjiang, and used Worldwide Responsible Accredited Production, a nonprofit certification organization, to ensure that its suppliers meet standards.
Seth Lennon, a spokesman for Worldwide, said that Hetian Taida had only recently enrolled in its program, and the organization had no information on possible coerced labor in Xinjiang. “We will certainly look into this,” he said.
Repeated calls over several days to Wu Hongbo, the chairman of Hetian Taida, went unanswered.
A state television broadcast promoting the internment camps showed textile workers at a company named Hetian Taida. The company shipped T-shirts to North Carolina last month.
Images of one camp featured in the state television broadcast, for example, show 10 to 12 large buildings with a single-story, one-room design commonly used for factories, said Nathan Ruser, a researcher at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute. The buildings are surrounded by fencing and security towers, indicating that they are heavily guarded like the rest of the camp.
“It seems unlikely that any detainee would be able to go to any building that they were not taken to,” Mr. Ruser said.
Commercial registration records also show at least a few companies have been established this year at addresses inside internment camps. They include a printing factory, a noodle factory and at least two clothing and textile manufacturers at camps in rural areas around Kashgar. Another clothing and bedding manufacturer is registered in a camp in Aksu in northwestern Xinjiang.
The government’s effort to connect the internment camps with factories emerged this year as the number of detainees climbed and Xinjiang faced rising costs to build and run the camps.
Many camps were once called “transformation through education centers” by the government, reflecting their mission: inducing inmates to cast aside Islamic devotion and accept Communist Party supremacy.
But since August, the Chinese government has defended the camps by arguing that they are job training centers that will help lift detainees and their families out of poverty by giving them the skills to join China’s economic mainstream. Many rural Uighurs speak little Chinese, and language training has been advertised as one of the main purposes of the camps.
Yet the practical training in the camps often appears to be rudimentary, said Adrian Zenz, a social scientist at the European School of Culture and Theology who has studied the campaign.
An early hint of the factory labor program came in March when Sun Ruizhe, the president of the China National Textile and Apparel Council, described it to senior industry representatives, according to a transcript of his speech that was posted on industry websites.
Mr. Sun said that Xinjiang planned to recruit from three main sources to increase the textile and garment sector’s work force by more than 100,000 in 2018: impoverished households, struggling relatives of prisoners and detainees, and the camp inmates, whose training “could be combined with developing the textile and apparel section.”
In April, the Xinjiang government began rolling out a plan to attract textile and garment companies. Local governments would receive funds to build production sites for them near the camps; companies would receive a subsidy of $260 to train each inmate they took on, as well other incentives.
In remarks in October defending the camps, a top official in Xinjiang, Shohrat Zakir, said the government was busy preparing “job assignments” for inmates formally finishing indoctrination and training. A budget document earlier this year from Yarkant, a county in Kashgar, said the camps were responsible for “employment services.”
The inmates assigned to factories may have to stay for years.
Mr. Byler said a relative of a Uighur friend was sent to an indoctrination camp in March and formally released this fall. But he was then told he had to work for up to three years in a clothing factory.
A government official, Mr. Byler said, suggested to his friend’s family that if the relative worked hard, his time in the factory might be reduced.
The Chinese state media has praised the centers as leading wayward people toward modern civilization. It also reports that the workers are generously paid.
“The training will turn them from ‘nomads’ into skilled marvels,” the official Xinjiang Daily said last month. “Education and training will make them into ‘modern people,’ useful to society.”
Austin Ramzy reported from Hong Kong.
0 notes
avanneman · 7 years
Text
Why Did Hillary “Lose”?
The most important, and the ugliest, thing to happen in 2016 was the decision of 46 percent of the American electorate to vote for the worst major party presidential candidate in American history. The second most important was the decision of 48 percent to vote for Hillary Clinton. So why did Hillary “lose”?
It is “arguable”—I know it is, because I have argued it many times myself—that the Democrats have no one to blame but themselves. Though they constantly proclaim how much they love America’s “great” middle class, they don’t. Democrats want to help people they feel sorry for, and they don’t feel sorry for the middle class. They want to help people they perceive as belonging to “out groups”—the poor, and particularly blacks and Hispanics, not to mention homosexuals and the current “it” group, transexuals.1 ObamaCare epitomized Democratic “values”—cutting middle-class Medicare benefits and taxing “Cadillac” health care plans enjoyed by many union members and other better off than average folks, in order to subsidize the poor.
At the same time, Democrats want to please the folks who pay the bills—the rich, which can include themselves, since the Democratic elite is about 90% 10%—upper middle class and above. The Clinton years convinced them that capitalism “works”—they made money too—and also convinced them that a Democrat with Wall Street cash couldn’t lose. To please his Wall Street buddies, Obama labored endlessly to “rein in” future Social Security and Medicare costs, to promote business “confidence”—confidence among billionaires that their precious billions wouldn’t be taxed to finance ordinary folks’ retirements.
Yes, but Obama did all of that in his first term, and still beat poor old Mitt Romney like a drum in 2012. And four years later, the economy was in much better shape than in 2012. Yet in 2016, supposedly “racist” whites in the big Rust Belt swing states, who voted for Obama in appreciable numbers, declined to vote for Hillary, costing her Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania. And in Florida, the biggest swing state of them all, which seemed to be “tending” Democratic, Hillary lost by 100,000 votes—less than 2% of Florida’s massive total, but still pretty embarrassing, since Obama had won by over 70,000 in 2012.
Since the election was so close in the big four Rust Belt states—a shift of about 100,000 votes would have put Hillary in—there are any number of factors that could “explain” Hillary’s defeat. Jim Comey’s disgustingly corrupt behavior; Hillary Clinton’s endless, and endlessly stupid, mishandling of the email server “issue”, which she both created and bungled in classic Clintonian style; beyond all that was her mega- mega-blunder of pushing for our disastrous, “smart power” invasion of Libya—ultimately Obama’s responsibility, of course, but it’s very unlikely that it would have happened without Clinton’s aggressive sponsorship. One thing Hillary has never outgrown is her unceasing appetite for virtuous intervention. She’s going to keep on killing innocent people until she gets it right.
Well, the purpose of this post was not to vent on Hillary, but to figure out why she lost. My favorite of the many “in-depth” takes floating around the internet is “How Trump Won: The South” by Sean Trende and David Byler over at RealClearPolitics, the first of a four-part, near book length series, with the “lessons” encapsulated here.
Briefly, Democrats are getting killed in rural areas, and beaten in semi-rural areas, while crushing it in the big cities. Since rural populations are shrinking, and urban ones are expanding, that sounds like good news for the Democrats. The problem is, as Trende and Byler point out, the urban mega-populations are concentrated in a few big states, so that in the presidential elections, Democrats roll up “useless” majorities in California, New York, and Illinois (and DC) and lose everywhere else. It’s even worse in both the Senate, because 18 states have virtually no “big city” vote, and in the House of Representatives, because in most states the Democratic vote is crammed into a handful of counties that 1) invite gerrymandering and 2) even make it hard to draw “balanced” districts in the first place.
To my mind, Democrats’ problems really started with Obama’s huge win in 2008, which terrified a lot of seriously rich folks, like the Koch boys. For whatever reason, the thought that universal health care, proposed by Harry Truman way back in 19482, might become a reality terrified the big money folks in the flyover states.3 Obama, of course, played right into their hands, as I’ve endlessly complained, by passing the Affordable Care Act, pushing through a national health insurance program that would take benefits away from people who had them—the folks on Medicare, primarily—and force many people to pay for health insurance that they did not want—or at least did not want to pay for—to help a relatively small population of poor people who did not vote that often and who, when they did vote, voted Democratic already. When you’ve got both the money and the masses against you, you’re going to take a beating, and the Democrats did, suffering horrible losses at the state level almost across the board.
All across the “capitalist” world, the parties in power during the Great Recession paid the price of incumbency. The massive countercyclical payments to the jobless, which were both necessary and effective in preventing the crisis from unraveling the world economy completely, infuriated the “good people” and precipitated a bitter reaction against “government”. Democrats were on the receiving end of this in Congress, but they were also vulnerable at the state level, because in virtually every state the Democratic Party is very closely linked to public employee unions. When times are hard, people don’t resist the urge to take out their frustrations on lazy, overpaid bureaucrats.4 Perhaps worst of all, an ever-increasing number of bureaucrats were retiring, on frequently over-generous pensions all pushed through by Democratic politicians in years past.
An increasingly “urban” party, tied to a hated bureaucracy, often given a racial, if not racist, tinge in northern states like Wisconsin and Michigan and southern states like North Carolina? Sounds like a recipe for disaster to me, and so it proved. At the same time, this is a movie we Democrats have seen before: in 1978 and 1994: a young Democrat comes into office, a “post-partisan problem-solver” who bases all his decisions on fact rather than fancy, only to discover that his generous gestures—pardoning Vietnam War draft dodgers, allowing gays in the military, and “bringing us all together” with the gift of universal health insurance—prove stunningly divisive.
Yet Obama won going away against Romney in 2012, despite a full four years of the harshest economy that 90% of the population could remember, an economy that was still only slowly improving when the votes were counted. But, in retrospect, we can see that plant-closin’, dollar bill-wearin’ Mitt, the businessman’s friend, and sworn enemy of the 47%, was exactly the wrong choice to pull away angry working class whites from Obama, as Trump would do to stunning effect to Hillary four years later.
Obama followed his easy win over Mitt with a tougher victory, triumphing in yet another budget shut down with hysterical House Republicans. It looked like Democrats were on a roll, but then the wheels came off, repeatedly. ObamaCare had a disastrous rollout, a disgraceful failure on the part of the administration and the president personally. The big bets the administration had placed on the “Arab Spring” led to one Mid East disaster after another, Benghazi being the most spectacular, and most awkward, particularly for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, although almost no one blamed for her real sin of pushing for the Libyan invasion in the first place. ISIS appeared out of nowhere and nothing to demolish Obama’s proud claim to have brought peace in Iraq. Putin claimed the Crimea and began “destabilization” in eastern Ukraine, and suddenly it was manly versus metrosexual. The Ebola virus scare was the last nail in the Democrats’ coffin, an “everything go wrong” touch reminiscent to George Bush’s 2006 nightmare election. But probably the real story for the Democrats was the continued shrinkage of the rural and semi-rural vote, which gave the Republicans a stunning advantage in state legislatures and governorships.
The steady decline of the Democratic Party in Congress and at the state level helps explain why there was no real alternative to the drearily battle-scarred Hillary Clinton in 2016, although at the start of the primary season no one would have guessed how “anti-globalist” the country had become. Ever since Vietnam and Watergate, American voters, when they aren’t re-electing a president, are looking for an “outsider”, and never was that mood so strong as in 2016.
So how can the Democrats come back? The notion that there is a natural Democratic majority—that we just have to invigorate the base (by adopting the policies of whoever is making the argument) is tempting. After all, Hillary “won” by almost three million votes. But as the county maps show, the Democratic base isn’t deployed strategically. We have millions of “extra” Democrats in states like New York and California, where we don’t need them, and millions more in solidly “anti-liberal” (i.e., anti-black) states like Mississippi and Alabama, where it’s impossible for the “black party” to win a state-wide election. Hillary worked hard to ramp up the base, and didn’t do too badly, except that, as Trende and Byler point out, the Democrats continue to spiral downwardly in the rural vote (the rural white vote), which is deployed strategically, in a majority of the states, all across the country, except the coastal areas. Furthermore, I suspect that the “turncoat” states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Ohio, and Pennsylvania, the more we Democrats ramp up our base, the more we ramp up the Republican base of “excluded” whites, as has long been the case in the South.
Democrats need to study how and why we lost Florida, and North Carolina, two states that would have given Hillary a victory. Florida is almost the ballgame for the Democrats, and at the state level the party is painfully weak there, despite Obama’s two wins. I am, by temperament, an “Above all, no zeal” kind of guy, but if you got no zeal, you got no politics. Money may be the mother’s milk of politics5, but emotion is its life’s blood. Channeling Democratic emotion, and outrage, over Donald Trump’s constant grossness, in a manner that will restore the Democratic Party’s level of acceptance in rural areas to possibly pre-Al Gore levels is the task before us.6
Yeah, so how do we do that? First of all, forget about gun control, easy to say but hard to do, because millions of party loyalists/activists feel “passionate” about this issue, given added salience, in liberal minds, by the terrorist attacks in San Bernardino and Orlando, which quite possibly cost Clinton the election. Eliminate the guns, eliminate the attacks. Simple, right?
I’m sorry, but gun control has never worked. It failed, and is failing, to stop violence in inner city neighborhoods, and it won’t stop terrorist attacks. There are virtually no legal guns in France, and the attacks there probably cost Clinton almost as many votes as the attacks here. And back in the seventies and eighties, European “no gun” policies didn’t prevent significant terrorist attacks throughout those decades. Liberals shouldn’t let their personal revulsion at the idea of owning a deadly weapon, and their disgust those who delight in them,7 from making the smart choice and dropping gun control.
Liberals should also, as I’ve said perhaps a million times before, detune their enthusiasm for the environment. If Elon Musk is going to save us all, well, fine. We’ll be saved. Otherwise, let’s let the 22nd century do most of the heavy lifting on this one. We don’t have to solve their problems.8
Liberals should not let Trump’s success in obtaining the support of working class whites convince them that they can appeal to these voters by outbidding Trump with an expanded welfare state. These people do not want welfare, of any kind. They want “good jobs”, which frankly they are more likely to get by moving. However, Democrats do have a real opportunity to hammer Trump to make good on his “trillion dollar infrastructure plan”, insisting that he put infrastructure before tax cuts for the rich, which of course no living Republican wants to do. If Republicans are so passionate for the middle class, let them do something for them other than reducing their bosses’ taxes.9
It’s also becoming more and more likely that ObamaCare will prove to be as tough a nut for Republicans as it was for Democrats—Obama’s last laugh, one might say. How’s that ‘repeal and replace’ thing workin’ out for you, Paulie? Instead of bold action, we’re getting an orgy of Republican foot shifting.
There are plenty of Democrats, who, I’m sure, can name every county that Hillary carried in 2016. Here’s hoping that they can direct the party to go beyond them.
Afterwords Dream on, neoliberal, one might say, while looking at my recommendations. The two great pillars of the Democratic Party today are California and New York, where environmentally correct and politically correct liberals are firmly in command. Their own success teaches them that their brand of liberalism works, and there’s no need to change, so nags like me can just go blow.10 Well, the 2018 elections may teach a needed lesson, and may not. The Republicans may blow themselves up, and they may not. We’ve never had such an unstable president. Trump, obviously, is a gambler, but he’s a gambler who can clean himself up when he has to, or at least when he wants to. He’s now swinging rather desperately at Obama to distract attention from the “Russian Connection,” which may have legs—in particular, the extent to which Trump, Inc. has been dependent on Russian money. We'll just have to wait and see.
The acceptance of homosexuality as “normal”, which it has always been, has been one of the few great accomplishments of the modern era. However, I don’t think the Supreme Court should have been the institution making all these decisions, though, in an eat your cake and have it too way, I don’t object to them too much either. Politicians very often like courts to make the tough decisions for them. The fact that there’s been little kickback against the Court’s actions suggest that the ancient prejudice against homosexuals has declined significantly. On the other hand, I think that the “old-fashioned Catholics” on the Supreme Court, particularly the late Justice Scalia and Justice Alioto, were embittered by the decisions and felt emboldened to make “political” decisions on their own as payback, for example in the Citizens United “corporations are people too” decision, which could have been decided much more narrowly, as discussed in Justice Stevens’ dissent, and District of Columbia v. Heller, Justice Scalia’s gift to the NRA (see Stevens’ dissent in that one as well), along with a host of fake “voting fraud” cases. Has the Court ever wondered if making policy via 5-4 decisions is a bad idea? Apparently, the answer to that question is "no". ↩︎
“With both a Democratic president and a Democratic Congress, we’ll get national health insurance for sure!” exulted an exultant Ronald Reagan after the election results were in to a fellow “hemophiliac” liberal (Ronnie’s self-description in his 1966 autobiography Where’s the Rest of Me?, which he did not have reprinted in 1980). In 1961, of course, Ronnie recorded an hilarious “warning” about the evils of socialized medicine. In 1983, Reagan joined with Democratic House Speaker Tip O’Neill to “save” both Medicare and Social Security, which he also hated. ↩︎
The Kochs actually do live in Manhattan and lead outwardly Upper East Side lives, despite their Midwest attitudes. The famous New Yorker article denouncing the Kochs seemed intended more to get them ousted from New York’s stratospheric upper, upper class, “on the board of the Met” society than to produce revelations of substance. “They should go back to Kansas where they belong!” ↩︎
One of the first things FDR did in 1933 was to cut the salaries of federal employees. If I’m suffering, other people have to suffer too! After the 2010 Democratic “shellacking”, Obama started talking about how it was time for government to “tighten the belt,” when precisely the opposite was the case. ↩︎
Attributed to Jesse “Big Daddy” Unruh, speaker of the California House of Representatives back in the day. Jesse used to say things like “If you can’t take their money, drink their booze, sleep with their women, and then look them in the eye and vote the other way, you don’t belong up here” (“here” being Sacramento). ↩︎
In 1996 Clinton carried Arkansas, Louisiana, and West Virginia, three “never again” states for the Democrats. ↩︎
Chris Kyle wannabes who fantasize about “pink mist”, aka blowing someone’s head off, are pathetic/repulsive, but they very seldom kill anyone. Let them masturbate in peace. ↩︎
More obsessive bitching about the “environment” from Alan Vanneman here. ↩︎
More “big picture” economic growth thoughts here ↩︎
In a classic instance of blue state arrogance/stupidity, both states have banned fracking, which has pushed natural gas prices so low that, in most parts of the country, it is cheaper than coal, while producing about half as much CO2. The Bernieites want to ban fracking nationwide because corporations=evil. ↩︎
0 notes