i was at a Very Legit policy event recently and some Very Legit guy from the frickin' White House is on a panel, lamenting how government responsibilities are divided up weirdly:
"if a chicken wandering around DC has avian flu and it dies on the Natl Mall, it's the responsibility of the Natl Park Service. if it dies on the sidewalk NEXT to the mall, it's the responsibility of the DC metro police. if it dies on the front steps of one of the federal agencies, it's the responsibility of the Dept of Agriculture. but if YOU eat it and get sick, it's suddenly the responsibility of the CDC. does anyone see a problem with this?!"
and another person on the panel, a Very Legit academic researcher, leans forward, looks him dead in the eye, and says, "yeah, 'cause birds aren't real."
79 notes
·
View notes
Twitter discourse on DIY testosterone-based HRT is killing me.
There's the refusal to acknowledge that estrogen-based HRT is honestly easier to get and take-- non-scheduled pills are different from a schedule III injected drug, even if you're buying both on the grey market.
That just because no trans masc has been arrested for taking DIY testosterone yet, doesn't mean there's no risk of possession being used as a weapon against trans mascs or used to track us.
That being forced off a doctor/pharmacy regimen and onto an unregulated grey market due to your existence being criminalized is intimidating, fraught, and unsafe, especially for younger and isolated guys.
That DIY for a scheduled substance means your supply is even more precarious than it might otherwise be and going on and off, and that precarity is chilling in itself.
And finally that making these statements doesn't mean I think people supporting DIY or doing DIY hormones are bad and should stop. If you want to find a way to help trans mascs with their medical needs, you have to have to be aware of how testosterone regimens are different medically and legally from estrogen regimens, and the multiple risks involved and how to mediate them.
And if you think I'm walking on the wrong side of the "safety vs needs" tightrope, that's fine. But it's killing me how much of the arguments just dismiss outright trans masc concerns about testosterone-specific worries.
28 notes
·
View notes
Could u talk about how Carolina achieves goalie haven!!!!!! I am so intrigued sjdhsysosjshs (especially bc one of my fav players is an occasional Carolina goalie 🤭🤭🤭)
aaa Yes. sorry this took so long!!
One of the biggest questions among analysts in hockey is: how much of a goalie's quality is determined by the team they play behind? If you move a goalie to a different team and their numbers change drastically, is it the goalie not adjusting well to the move or is it the team? How separable is a goalie from his skaters?
So, we're going to talk about mathematics. Not in any technical terms, because it is two in the morning as I write this, but just sort of general stats stuff. In hockey (and in other sports but we're talking about hockey,) there is a metric called expected goals, or xG for short.
The general gist of xG, for the uninitiated: it is a made up number that you cannot watch the game and materialize, unlike shots or goals or times your favourite player was shown close up on camera -- you need a computer to generate it. There's also multiple different xG models, since every stat bro seems to have his own. However, they all function in a pretty similar way: determine the odds a shot goes in the net based off its location (on ice), its location (relative to the net), and its location (relative to other skaters, who may be inclined to block the shot in order to prevent this expected goal from becoming an actual one.)
Expected goals are, for lack of a better term, a smoother way of determining the way a game really went than its result. You ever watch a game where your team was in the offensive zone the whole time, just totally dominating play, but a couple of bad bounces and dumb mistakes means you lost? The expected goals might tell a different story.
Back to Carolina. Someone in their front office, many eons ago (I got seriously into hockey only last season, so I can't give you a date) realized this: over the course of one game, anything can happen, but over the course of a dozen? 82? the numbers tend to line up. So the most guaranteed way to win, at least through the regular season, is to find a way to jack up your xG and drop down your opponent's. And the way they do this is with Corsi.
If you're still uninitiated, Corsi is essentially the total amount of shot attempts: shots on goal plus blocked shots plus misses. Corsi ratios actually tend to line up very similarly with xG ratios: if you have twice the shot attempts of your opponent, odds are you'll have twice the goals. Quantity over quality!
The on-ice way they do this is with a very, very high-structure game: your defenders are there to dump the puck in and then make sure it doesn't get dumped out, and your forwards are there to chase the puck and pepper the opposing goalie with softies until he slips up. In the defensive zone, they hound the opponent's forwards, forcing them to either lob a soft one on net or give up the puck. Carolina is currently third in shots for per game (34.91), and dead first in shots against (25.74).
So: say you're a goalie on a team that routinely gives up 45 shots a game (hello John Gibson!) versus a goalie on a team that only gives up 25. That's a much, much lower workload -- on average one shot you'll have to stop every two and a half minutes or so (although shots as a rule tend to come in chunks, so the standard deviation is very high here.) And because you'll have this lower workload, odds on you'll be better rested for every shot, thereby being fresher and more likely to stop it.
Also, because of how tight Carolina is in the defensive zone, very few of these shots against are of significant quality -- they rarely give up breakaways, which are typically the major generator of high-danger chances.
All in all: a Carolina goalie is going to have a good time, not necessarily because they are a good goalie, but because they are in Carolina -- facing few chances and especially few high-danger ones allows the goalie an easier time stopping pucks, which boosts their stats.
26 notes
·
View notes