UP Madarsa Board Result 2023 Maulvi, Alim, Fazil & Kamil Marksheet - Raj Neet

The UP Board Madarsa result 2023 for Maulvi, Alim, Fazil & Kamil will be made available on madarsaboard.upsdc.gov.in. UP Madarsa Board Result 2023 will be made public on July 01, 2023. Students will need both their branch (Maulvi, Kamil, Alim, & Fazil) and roll number to get their UP Madarsa Board result 2023. The Maulvi, Alim, Fazil & Kamil branches’ Uttar Pradesh Madarsa board 2023 results will…

View On WordPress

PTI TROUNCES 13-PARTY ALLIANCE IN KARACHI’S NA-245 BY-POLL

PTI TROUNCES 13-PARTY ALLIANCE IN KARACHI’S NA-245 BY-POLL

The ally parties of the ruling coalition have dealt a major blow after Pakistan Tehreek-e- Insaf (PTI) emerged victorious in the NA-245 Karachi by-election with a huge margin on Sunday. As per the unconfirmed and unofficial results of all 263 polling stations, PTI candidate Mahmood Maulvi bagged 29,475 votes against MQM-Pakistan’s (MQM-P) Moid Anwar, who managed to secure 13,193 votes. TLP’s…

View On WordPress

PTI retains Aamir Liaquat Hussain’s vacant NA-245 seat in by-poll

PTI retains Aamir Liaquat Hussain’s vacant NA-245 seat in by-poll

A voter at a PTI camp outside a polling station during the NA-245 by-poll. — NNI Unofficial results from 263 polling stations show PTI’s Mehmood Maulvi emerged victorious in NA-245 by-poll. MQM-P’s Mueed Anwar comes in second place with 13,193 votes. In 2018, PTI’s Aamir Liaquat beat Dr Farooq Sattar after securing 56,673 votes. KARACHI: PTI has retained the NA-245 seat of Karachi on Sunday in…

View On WordPress

UP Madarsa Board Result 2020: UP Board Madarsa Board results will come at 1 pm today

UP Madarsa Board Result 2020: UP Board Madarsa Board results will come at 1 pm today

उत्तर प्रदेश मदरसा  एजुकेशन काउंसिल आज एक बजे बुधवार को मदरसा बोर्ड के नतीजे जारी करेगा। नतीजे बोर्ड की आधिकारिक वेबसाइट madarsaboard.upsdc.gov.in से देख सकते हैं। 

जो उम्मीदवार मुंशी, मौलवी, आलिम, कामिल, फाजिल परीक्षा 2020 में बैठे थे, वो ऑनलाइन नतीजे चेक कर सकते हैं। मदरसा बोर्ड के चेयरमैन आरपी सिंह के बताया था कि मदरसा बोर्ड के नतीजे बुधवार 1 जुलाई को घोषित किए जाएंगे। आपको बता दें कि मदरसा…

View On WordPress

Bihar Madrasa Board announces Fauquania and Maulvi results 2020; check here - Times of India

New Post has been published on https://apzweb.com/bihar-madrasa-board-announces-fauquania-and-maulvi-results-2020-check-here-times-of-india/

Bihar Madrasa Board announces Fauquania and Maulvi results 2020; check here - Times of India

NEW DELHI: Bihar State Madrasa Education Board (BSMEB), Patna has announced the Fauquania and Maulvi result 2020 on its official website.

Candidates, who have appeared for the examination, can check their result online through the official website – bsmeb.org.

Candidates can check their result online through candidate login using candidate roll code and roll number.

Last year, around 75,000 appeared for the Fauquania exam while around 56,000 cleared it.

This year, 71,284 candidates wrote their papers out of which 64,290 cleared the examination. The pass percentage was around 92.62. In the Fauquania examination, with 60% or more marks around 2244 candidates secured first division and 53,289 got second division while 8757 candidates managed to clear the examination with third division. Around 42 male and 57 female non-Muslim candidates also cleared the Fauquania examination this year.

Click here to check BSMEB Fauquania Result 2020

Click here to check BSMEB Maulvi Result 2020For the Maulvi examination the result was 96.31 per cent. Out of 27,221 around 25,223 candidates cleared the Maulvi exams this year in the state. Around 28 non-Muslim (10 male and 18 female) candidates have also passed the examination.

Exam Maulvi Fauquania Appeared 27221 71284 Passed 25223 64290 1st Division 3331 2244 2nd Division 20828 53289 3rd Division 1064 8757 Pass percentage 96.31 92.62 Non-Muslims paased 28 99

For Maulvi examination 3331 candidates received first class, 20828 got second class while 1064 registered third class.

Board President Abdul Kaiyum Ansari, while addressing the mediapersons, said that this year the exam results were released as per the academic calendar announced at the beginning of the session. Madrasa Board Secretary Saeed Asanari was also present at the conference, called for the announcement of the results.

Source link

मदरसा शिक्षा बोर्ड परीक्षा 2020: फौकानिया व मौलवी का रिजल्ट घोषित बिहार राज्य मदरसा शिक्षा बोर्ड ने शनिवार को फौकानिया और मौलवी का रिजल्ट घोषित कर दिया। फौकानिया में कुल 71284 छात्र-छात्राएं परीक्षा में शामिल हुए। इनमें 64290 ने सफलता प्राप्त की। छात्रों की सफलता... Source link

★Salman Khan film Dabangg 3 faces flak over insulting Hindu Sadhus by Hindu Janajagruti Samiti!

Nov 26, 2019.

Salman Khan’s movie Dabangg three is seen getting caught in a brand new controversy. The Hindu Janajagruti Samiti, whereas making allegations towards the movie, mentioned that some scenes of its songs have damage the non secular sentiments of Hindus. As a result of this, the movie shouldn’t be given Censor Board. The committee says that within the movie’s title track ‘Hud Hud Dabangg’, Salman is seen dancing with sages and saints. Makers have insulted him by capturing such scenes.

Based on a Instances Now report, Sunil Ghanwat, the organizer of the Hindu Jan Jagriti Samiti in Maharashtra and Jharkhand, questioned the movie, saying, “Salman Khan is seen dancing with sadhus in the film’s song. Due to this The sentiments of the Hindus have been hurt. The way they have shown the monks and saints in the way Salman can show the Mullah-Maulvi or any priest, dancing like that? ”

Allow us to let you know that within the video, Salman is seen dancing with folks dressed up as Shiva, Vishnu and Brahma on the banks of the river. Let me let you know that this isn’t the primary time that Salman’s movie Dabangg three is concerned in such an issue. Earlier, it was reported from the capturing set of the movie that capturing was completed by placing a bit of wooden on Shiva Linga. After which the movie’s workforce, whereas presenting the clarification, mentioned that it was completed for the security and honor of the Shivalinga.

Let’s say that in ‘Dabangg 3’, Sonakshi Sinha, Sai Manjrekar, Arbaaz Khan, Sudeep Kicha can be seen within the lead position with Salman. The movie is directed by Prabhu Deva and the movie is releasing on December 20, 2019.

Muslim converts to Christianity

Ubaydallah ibn Jahsh: (d. 627) the first cousin and brother-in-law of the Muslim prophet Muhammad, Ubaydallah was one of the four ḥunafā', a group of friends who rejected idol worship and followed a form of philosophical monotheism in the years before Muhammad’s declaration of prophethood. Ubaydallah was an early convert to Islam, which resonated with his own ideas about God; during the early persecution of the movement, he and a group of other Muslims moved to the Christian kingdom of Aksum, which gave the community asylum. While he lived in Aksum, he encountered Christianity and converted to the faith, which created friction in the refugee community, ultimately resulting in his wife Ramla leaving him because of his apostasy. He died in Aksum, and his wife would later marry Muhammad. Ṣurḥān of Dwin: (d. 703-705)  Ṣurḥān was an Arab soldier stationed in Armenia in the late 650s. Armenia represented the very border of the Islamic Empire, a border that ultimately could not be controlled in the wake of the civil war that broke out in Syria. As Arab troops were recalled to fight the Umayyads, Ṣurḥān took advantage of the chaos in order to stay, having grow attached to the Armenian community. He was baptized, got married to a local woman, and had several kids with her. About forty years later, the Islamic Empire (now controlled by the Umayyads) decided to end Armenian semi-independent rule and sent a new governor to control the region. As an example for others against apostasy from Islam, the governor ordered the crucifixion of Ṣurḥān, who was forced to face southward (the direction of Mecca) as a symbolic act of submission. It is said that this cross miraculously turned eastward, the traditional direction of Christian prayer, before he died. Anthony al-Qurayshi: (d. 799) Rawḥ was a member of the Quraysh tribe, the same one that Muhammad was born into, and a possible former Umayyad who defected to the ‘Abbasid dynasty. Like many Muslim aristocrats, he lived in a monastery-palace, where he was known to harass the priest, remove the crosses, and even eat the Host from the tabernacle. One day, he decided to use an icon of Saint Theodore for target practice, but when he fired his arrow, it miraculously turned on him and shot him through the hand. This, compounded with a vision a few days later in which the Eucharist became a lamb during Mass, and an appearance by Saint Theodore himself to chastise him, Rawḥ decided to convert to Christianity. Patriarch Elias II was afraid that his conversion would cause controversy, so sent him to the River Jordan to be baptized and given the name Anthony. From there, he wandered the desert for a few years as an ascetic before returning home to Damascus; his family mocked him and demanded he revert, but he would not; he was taken before the Caliph; he was beheaded on Christmas of 799, a fate he gladly accepted in atonement for previous raids he had committed against Byzantine settlements. Renouard of Toulouse: (fl. late 8th Century) A lieutenant of Saint William Fièrebrace, who was a duke know for his conflicts with the Umayyad Emirate. Renouard was apparently a Spanish Muslim who converted to Christianity and defected to William’s side. Both figures were immortalized in the chansons de geste that circulated in 12th and 13th century France. Saint Casilda of Toledo: (fl. early 11th Century) the daughter of the ruler of Islamic Toledo, Casilda was especially known for her compassion for prisoners. She would often sneak extra bread to them. When she became ill, she made a pilgrimage to the well of Saint Vincent in Burgos, presumably at the suggestion of some of the Christian prisoners. When she was cured, she chose to be baptized and lived to be 100 while living a solitary life of prayer near the well. Zayda of Seville: (fl. late 11th Century) the daughter-in-law of King al-Mu’tamid, the last Abbadid ruler of Seville. When the Almoravids, a Moroccan reform movement known for its strict interpretations of Islam, overthrew the more lenient Muslim kingdoms of Iberia, Zayda fled to Castille, where she became the mistress of Alfonso IV. She was eventually baptized as ‘Isabel’. After this, events become a little more murky; she gave birth to Alfonso’s only son, an illegitimate child named Sancho. She may have died giving birth to him, or she may have died giving birth to another child. If the latter is the case, it is possible that Zayda and Alfonso’s wife, Queen Isabel, are the same person. If that is the case, she gave birth to two more children. Fátima of Portugal: (d. mid 12th Century) a ‘Moorish princess’ according to oral tradition, probably a member of lesser nobility. In the year 1158, she and a group of other Muslims were captured while picnicking at a river by al-Qaşr. While in captivity, Fátima is said to have fallen in love with the leader of the Christian war band, Gonçalo Hermingues. She converted to Christianity in order to marry him, taking on Oureanna (‘Golden-One’) as her baptismal name. Tragically, she died shortly thereafter, and the heartbroken knight named a town after her. Centuries later, in 1917, the Virgin Mary is said to have appeared to three shepherd children in this town. Saint ‘Bersabei’: (d. 1480) the name given to an Ottoman officer by later Christian chroniclers. Bersabei was a member of the Ottoman force that conquered Otranto in 1480, under the command of Mehmet II the Conqueror. When the city fell in August of that year, the inhabitants were variously killed, sold into slavery, or forcibly converted to Islam. A group of 813 men who were commanded to convert refused; they were led up to a mountain now known as the Hill of Martyrs, where executioners (including Bersabei) killed them. During the mass martyrdom, the devotion of these Christians (and a miracle in which one of the martyred Christians continued to stand upright after his decapitation) caused this officer to declare his belief in their faith. He was subsequently impaled, dying alongside the martyrs of Otranto. These martyrs were canonized as saints in 2013. Omar ibn Said: (1770-1864) Born in the Imamate of Futa Toro, Omar ibn Said was captured and ‘sold into the hands of the Christians’ in 1807. He died a slave, in North Carolina. Omar ibn Said was an intelligent man who had grown up learning a variety of subjects from prominent scholars in his home region; he became famous in America for his literacy in Arabic, especially after writing on the walls of a jail cell after having been caught in an escape attempt. After being sold to the brother of the governor of North Carolina, he was supplied with both an Arabic Bible and an English Qur’an. Though he practiced Christianity, this seems to have been less a ‘conversion’ in a modern sense and more a simultaneous practicing of both Christianity and Islam (a sociological phenomenon that has a name, but I can’t remember it right now). His own Arabic writings reveal both a gratitude to the Owens family for his conversion to Christianity, as well as many invocations of blessings upon Jesus and Muhammad and quotations of the Qur’an from memory. In 1991, a mosque in North Carolina was named after him. Imaduddin Lahiz: (1830-1900) a fourth generation maulvi living in what was then Punjab, known for translating the Qur’an into Urdu and attacking the Ahmadi movement from a Sunni perspective. He converted to Christianity in 1866, along with his wife and nine children. This conversion was extremely controversial; like many converts during the colonial period, his intentions were seen as suspect and driven more by desire for material gain and affluence than a genuine faith. It reached the point where he felt the need to specify in his autobiography that he had converted ‘simply for the sake of attaining salvation’. He wrote several Biblical commentaries. Bonus: Bramimonde (Possibly 8th Century, possibly completely fictional) depicted in The Song of Roland as the wife of the ruler of Zaragoza, the city which Charlemagne attempted to seize from the Umayyad Emirate in 778. Historically, this campaign ended in a failure, with Charlemagne never again entering Iberia after the catastrophe of the Battle of Roncevaux Pass. The poet of The Song of Roland, however, wrote a different ending. In this ending, Charlemagne attacks Zaragoza a second time to avenge the death of his friend Roland, in which both Bramimonde’s husband Marsile and son Jurfaleu the Blonde are ultimately killed. Bramimonde is taken captive, and whereas most of the other captives are forcibly converted to Christianity, Bramimonde’s special status as widow to a king causes her to be catechized first; she is baptized when she decides she believes, taking on the name Juliana.

PTI retains Aamir Liaquat Hussain’s vacant NA-245 seat in by-poll

PTI retains Aamir Liaquat Hussain’s vacant NA-245 seat in by-poll

A voter at a PTI camp outside a polling station during the NA-245 by-poll. — NNI Unofficial results from 263 polling stations show PTI’s Mehmood Maulvi emerged victorious in NA-245 by-poll. MQM-P’s Mueed Anwar comes in second place with 13,193 votes. In 2018, PTI’s Aamir Liaquat beat Dr Farooq Sattar after securing 56,673 votes. KARACHI: PTI has retained the NA-245 seat of Karachi on Sunday in…

View On WordPress

Viral tweet appealing Muslim women to brainwash Hindu men into voting for Congress is fake.

A viral tweet allegedly posted by one Ansar Ahmad Ali has caused quite a stir on Twitter. While making rounds on  various social media, it has received around six thousand likes and two thousand retweets when posted on a Twitter page. Claims: The tweet gained attention after cricketer Shivam Dube married his Muslim girlfriend Anjum Khan and shared the news on social media. The viral tweet read, "बीजेपी के मुख्य वोटर है हिंदू लड़के सभी मुस्लिम लड़कियों से गुजारिश है अगले 6 महीने तक हिंदू लडको को प्रेमजाल में फसाओ फिर कांग्रेस को वोट देने के लिए मनाओ जिससे बीजेपी हार जायेगी!" ("The main voters of BJP are Hindu boys. All Muslim girls are requested to trap Hindu boys in their love trap for the next six months, then convince them to vote for Congress, which will defeat BJP!") Sharing it along with a picture of Dube and Khan's wedding, Twitter users wrote, "मौलवी ने कहा, अंजुम खान ने किया!" (Maulvi said it, Anjum Khan did it!) Twitter https://twitter.com/KreatelyMedia/status/1416387421168574465 archive https://twitter.com/DrRamOfficial/status/1416387642925588480 https://twitter.com/Brijesh945536/status/1416629791432667137 Facebook https://www.facebook.com/Kreately/posts/333892905035636 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/p/CRa2k3yLfkW/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

Truth

No, the tweet is fake as there is no such maulvi named Ansar Ahmad Ali on Twitter. With the introduction of Anti-conversion laws in various states in India, there is a lot of commotion going around inter-faith marriages. In this political climate, every inter-faith celebrity marriage is making news for all the wrong reasons. Therefore, we decided to run a fact check on a similar news story. Cricketer Shivam Dube's newlywed Muslim wife is getting trolled for allegedly following the appeal of a maulvi towards Muslim women to trap Hindu men and persuade them to vote for Congress. After searching for the username on Twitter, the following result showed up.

However, the user did exist and may have recently deleted their account since we found replies to the username @Ansar2ali2.

So, we went forward with the investigation and ran a reverse image search on the display picture of the Twitter account. We found that the man in the image is not Ansar Ahmad Ali but Maulana Shahabuddin Rizvi.

The following article on Down to Earth corroborates our findings and confirms that he is Maulana Shahabuddin Rizvi, the national general secretary of an organization named Tanzeem Ulema-e-Islam.

In addition to that, another fact-checking organization Alt News, spoke to Rizvi over a telephonic call, who said, “I have been informed that my image is being shared on social media with an inappropriate statement. I am not on Twitter. I plan to take a legal action against this. I have already informed my advocate about the same.” Hence, this proves that the viral tweet is posted by a fake account and is probably an attempt to spread hatred. Read the full article

Revisiting the dynamic power politics in Jammu and Kashmir

This article is written by Anmol Singh Khanuja, from NMIMS, Navi Mumbai.

Abstract

The content of Article 370 is no more with us now, Article 370 was an Article inserted in 1950 in the Constitution of India which extended special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, this special status has been a debated issue since the time it got incorporated in the Constitution of India, many political parties in India and the state of Jammu and Kashmir have raised the issue of autonomy and many have opposed the creation of Article 370. So before we applaud or show our dissent towards the abrogation of the content of Article 370, an individual should analyze the ideal history of the special status extended to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, from the instrument of accession to the internationalization and from autonomy to the argument of Inequality, this paper aims to discuss many perspectives related to the special status and its actual status before the abrogation of the Article.

Introduction

‘Politics’ a word which is not just a word, but is something which affects and impacts an individual. Aristotle in his book politics contends that ‘man is, by nature, a political animal’. Therefore, when anything impacts or affects an individual, an individual should possess the wisdom of why and how is he/she affected. The politics in Jammu and Kashmir is the politics which has not only affected Jammu and Kashmir’s citizens or an Indian citizen but that politics is known for its evident worldwide coverage. Article 370 has lost its contents after August 5, 2019, this Article was a result of how well politics is played to gain the confidence of a certain number of people. Indians have largely been affected by the existence of this article, so an Individual should at least try to know what the article was, why it was brought and how its contents got abrogated.

Power is a concept which has always remained an apple of the eye of politics. Max Weber defines power as the ability to impose one’s will even when there is opposition for others. Kashmir has always been a land of enchantment which represented sorrow, smile and cruelness by its stretched mountains and beautiful lakes. 

For any person in power, these places play a major role in determining the strength of the kingdom, Akbar in 1586 captured this land by deceiving Yousaf Shah Chak. Then this land was captured by the Afghans without the will of the people, Maharaja Ranjit Singh again captured this land from the Afghans. Maharaja Gulab Singh (the great grandfather of Maharaja Hari Singh who signed the instrument in October 1947) was a Dogra General in Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s Army. After the death of Ranjit Singh, Gulab Singh deceived the successors of Maharaja Ranjit Singh by negotiating with the Brits to sign the treaty of Amritsar in 1846, the Brits then returned Kashmir to Gulab Singh for 75 Lakhs, since then the Dogra dynasty ruled the Jammu and Kashmir province.

                              Click Above

Phase I (1930-1947): The idea of India with the idea of Kashmir

Indian National Movement was gaining its popularity after the 1930s, as the concept of Purna Swaraj (complete Independence) was established and propagated. Similarly, Maharaja’s collaboration with the Brits became evident, so the population of Jammu and Kashmir too started questioning the hegemonic rule which led the foundations of the All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim conference in 1932 under the leadership of Maulvi Mohammed Yusuf Shah, Sheikh Abdullah and Chaudhari Ghulam Abbas. With time, Sheikh Abdullah became the leader in the state of Jammu and Kashmir a tall personality with good oratory skills, a man who cogently showed his vision to the state.

Meanwhile, when the Indian National Congress saw this rise in Jammu and Kashmir, they wanted to extend the protest against the Brits. So, the popular person at a national level to influence Kashmir was Jawaharlal Nehru (an Allahabad born Kashmiri Pandit), Nehru from the initial stage wanted Kashmir to be a part of India because India with Kashmir represented India’s belief and commitment towards the principles of secularism.  This thing and the politics of Indian National Congress had a huge impact on the All Jammu and Kashmir Muslim Conference, an impact which was visible when its name got changed from Jammu Kashmir Muslim conference to Jammu Kashmir National Conference in 1939.

As time passed, the cabinet mission plan came up in 1946 where the British Crown agreed to transfer powers from the British government to Indian leadership.  Which then infuriated the Muslim leaders to go for a Muslim Nation i.e.  Pakistan.  Nehru on 10th July 1946 made a speech where he rejected the idea of two dominions thus stating that the congress was neither bound nor committed to the plan.  Later on, in September 1946 interim government was established in which Jawaharlal Nehru as he was the Congress President during that time became the Prime Minister in the Interim Government, Congress till now did not accept the idea of Pakistan but accepted the interim government.

Nehru was not the only man who advocated that Kashmir should go with India, other thinkers like Lord Curzon, also wanted Kashmir’s accession to India, as it was important for the Indian Union for security purposes too.  Sardar Patel, was not ready for Kashmir initially,  as he believed that it was a Muslim dominated state and could easily join the Muslim Dominion,  it was Nehru who changed his mind because Kashmir represented the idea of India which was even bigger than the idea of Pakistan and for security purposes too, Kashmir was important. As the borders of Kashmir were joined with three Nations namely Soviet Union, Afghanistan, China and a nation in making Pakistan. Nehru also had a fear that if Kashmir went with Pakistan, then Kashmir and India could become a Battleground for the two blocks.  Kashmir was so close to the Soviet Union which was evident from a statement made by Kurushev (the leader of the Soviet Union) on his visit to India in 1955- ” you can climb the mountains and shout to us”.  Also, the rejection of the idea of Pakistan by Kashmiris would have given a blow to the two Nation theorists and its followers because at the initial stage there was only an idea of India, an idea of a different Muslim Nation came later on.

Meanwhile “the Quit Kashmir movement” also started in 1946 against the Maharaja.  The Maharaja was indecisive as once stated by Lord Mountbatten.  He was indecisive regarding what to do, as his Throne was now in danger after the 1947 Indian Independence Act where 2 Dominions were made and 565 princely states were given the option to either join any Dominion India or Pakistan or stay independent. India became independent on 15th august 1947, till now many provinces were incorporated and integrated to India because of Sardar Patel and Jawaharlal Nehru, but as I said earlier, Maharaja was indecisive. he wanted to stay independent but the high amount of Muslim population lured Pakistan to launch an attack through Tribal invasion. The tribal invaders were ruthless, they killed, tortured people and raped women in the valley.

The invasion compelled the maharaja to ask for help from India which was also an opportunity exercised by the maharaja to compel the Indian government for grant of autonomy to Jammu and Kashmir and then the instrument of accession was signed on 27th October 1947, where the union government had absolute powers on three things, namely; 1. defence; 2. communications; and 3. External affairs. rest all the things were governed by state government subject to the concurrent list.

Phase II (1947-53): Grant of autonomy

At the time of accession, the Indian government made it clear that this accession was a temporary reform and that the fate of Jammu and Kashmir will be decided by its people because India followed democracy and that Kashmiri voices have not been heard for many years. So, a plebiscite would be conducted once the situation climbs back to normal. Meanwhile, there were a lot of difficulties which were prevalent after partition on drawing materials and essential supplies to the state of Jammu and Kashmir because before partition the commodities were supplied easily through three rivers, but after partition, those ports went to Pakistan.  Hence, It was a tough job to supply commodities to Kashmir when it needed the most. 

 The idea of a plebiscite was not a new idea it was linked with the annexation of Junagarh, Where the king of Junagadh was a Muslim and the majority population living in his kingdom were Hindus. So, India Union demanded a plebiscite, where 99% of the population agreed to go with India.

Between 25th October and 17th November 1947, around 700 soldiers were lifted from New Delhi to Kashmir. Meanwhile, Lord Mountbatten advised Nehru to go to the UN because this would have done a loss to the reputation of Pakistan at the international stage.  Also, Prime Minister Nehru was confident about his relations with Sheikh and that the will of the people of Kashmir was with India.  So, to avoid further conflict and loss of lives, India appealed to the UN under article 35 of the UN charter. Nehru was a believer in international institutions but this appeal also exposed him to a lot of Criticism that Nehru should have proceeded to the UN under chapter 7 and not Chapter 6.

At one stage it was established that India would withdraw from UN Commission but later on Prime Minister Nehru made a speech stating that the council in India cannot guarantee better cooperation for the commission on Kashmir and then in summers of 1948 came a resolution on the plebiscite and  An affirmation to Pakistan’s involvement over the tribal invasion in Kashmir.

Also, it is important to know that the UN failed to comply with its resolutions which allowed Pakistan to continue its malpractices in the western provinces of Kashmir. Furthermore, the inclination of the US towards Pakistan was making tasks for India difficult. India tried to keep good relations with the US, but the US was busy implementing the Marshall plan in Europe and that India’s stand was a non-aligned stand, this made the US uninterested. These all things compelled India to go towards the Soviet Union, also the Soviets supported India’s claim over Kashmir. The UN’s involvement over Kashmir was prevalent till 1952 or 53, after that the international lobbying by India has kept the matter silent.

Meanwhile, in the Constituent Assembly of India, DR B R Ambedkar (the chairperson of the drafting committee) refused to draft Article 370, so the task was given to N. Gopalaswamy Ayyangar. Ambedkar’s reason was that Article 370 portrayed biasedness and inequality. Sardar Patel too criticised the Article initially but understood the gravity of the Article later. 

In a debate in constituent assembly which was drafting the Constitution of India, N. Gopalaswamy Ayyangar said and I quote – Till a constituent assembly comes into being, only an interim arrangement is possible and not an arrangement that can at once be brought into line with the arrangement which at once be brought into line with the arrangement that exists in the case of other States….it is an inevitable conclusion that, at the present moment, we could establish only an interim system. Article 306A (an initial article which resulted in article 370) is an attempt to establish such a system, he further stated that – The effect of this Article is that the Jammu and Kashmir State which is now a part of India will continue to be a part of India, will be a unit of the future Federal Republic of India and the Union Legislature will get jurisdiction to enact laws on matters specified either in the Instrument of Accession or by later addition with the concurrence of the Government of the State. And steps have to be taken for the purpose of convening a constituent Assembly in due course which will go into the matters I have already referred to. When it has come to a decision on the different matters it will make a recommendation to the President who will either abrogate article 306A or direct that it shall apply with such modifications and exceptions as the constituent assembly may recommend. That, sir, is briefly a description of the effect of this article, and I hope the House will carry it.

As Pandit Nehru was abroad so Sardar Patel refuted long opposition of Maulana Hasrat Mohani and said that the “History of ground realities of Jammu and Kashmir was such as it necessitated a special status and so by this special status was accepted by the Constituent Assembly on October 17, 1949, and was brought to force by presidential order of 1950 on 26th day of January 1950.

Furthermore, in October 1948, 250 delegates representing Hindu, Muslim and Sikh population unanimously confirmed Kashmir’s Accession to India. This was again reconfirmed from speeches of Sheikh Abdullah and Prime Minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru in the All Jammu Kashmir conference held at Srinagar on September 24th, 1949.

After 15th October 1947, the interim government was established where Mehr Chand Mahajan presided as Prime Minister of the state of Jammu and Kashmir under Maharaja’s cabinet. In 1949, Hari Singh made a proclamation transferring his powers to his son Yuvraj Karan Singh and made him regent of the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Karan Singh remained as regent till the post of Sadr-e-Riyasat was abolished in 1965 and further remained governor of the state till 1967.

Sheikh Abdullah replaced Mehr Chand in 1948 and remained as prime minister of the state of Jammu and Kashmir till the 1st assembly elections, it was the 1st time when the JKNC (Jammu Kashmir National Conference) won 75 seats in constituent assembly election 1951 and again Sheikh was made the Prime Minister, but this time he didn’t last long. His Anti-India approach and changing of sides like his involvement in talks of Independent Kashmir placed him under detention from 1953 to 1975. Also, a point to be noted here is that the constituent assembly consisted of 25 members from Pakistan occupied Kashmir (POK), the constituent assembly was in-charge of drafting the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir.

Before his arrestment in 1953, Sheikh Abdullah reached a consensus with the union government came to be known as Delhi agreement of 1952 which gave certain rights to Jammu and Kashmir of having its flag but with no conflict with the Indian flag, the post of Sadr-e-riyasat with the consultation of state government, domicile rights, Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction and that president can impose only Article 352 of the Indian Constitution (Emergency provision).

Phase 3 (1953-1975): Erosion of autonomy

In my view, the arrestment of Sheikh Abdullah was due to clash between Abdullah’s demand for autonomy, and Nehru’s greater integration vision for Kashmir, the arrestment of Sheikh Abdullah made Bakshi Ghulam Muhammed the prime minister of Jammu & Kashmir, he remained as the Prime Minister of Jammu and Kashmir till October 1963, during his regime, the National conference became a branch of the Indian National Congress because some major Constitutional orders were passed during his regime. 

Meanwhile, these constitutional orders tampered the state’s Autonomy status, there could’ve been many factors compelling the Indian Government to take these steps like the emergence of the cold war, so controlling the Kashmir region was important because of Pakistan and China and there can be more reasons.

Among these Constitutional orders, the most important was the Constitutional order (application to Jammu and Kashmir) 1954, which was for the benefit and effective enforcement of the Delhi Agreement 1952. Between 1954 and the mid-1970s, around 28 Constitutional orders were passed which incorporated 262 Union laws to the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Constitutional orders like, in 1958 the All India services was established, state’s financial autonomy was taken away, in 1959 State’s high court of appeal was placed under Supreme Court of India, in 1961 National Election Commission was empowered to hold elections, also the post of Sadr-e-Riyasat was demolished and Governor was established in the State of Jammu and Kashmir.

India changed its position openly on plebiscite in 1957 where Home Minister Govind Ballabh Panth, during his visit to Srinagar declared that Kashmir was an Integral Part of India and that there can be no question on Plebiscite. While in 1953, Government of India and the Government of Pakistan announced in a joint communique that a plebiscite would take place and whatsoever the result may be, it shall be binding on both the nations. The position in 1957 changed because in 1954 Pakistan and the United States signed a mutual defence assistance agreement leading to which Prime Minister Nehru immediately withdrew the plebiscite offer to Pakistan, Nehru stated the cause that such kind of cold war alignments affects the Kashmir issue and from this point onwards India resisted efforts for a plebiscite.

After the Indo-Pak 1971 War, which left the creation of Bangladesh, Pakistan officially recognized Bangladesh in the Simla Agreement of 1972 and amongst the many terms, there was a term to which India and Pakistan agreed that Kashmir dispute was a bilateral issue and that no 3rd party would intervene with immediate effect, whether it was the UN or any other nation, no one would intervene.

Indira Gandhi wanted to follow a new approach and so this led to the Indira-Sheikh accord in 1975. Sheikh Abdullah dropped his demand for autonomy because Indira Gandhi made things clear that “the clock couldn’t be put back in this manner”. Thus, the Sheikh was released on certain terms and conditions and Sheikh then became Chief Minister of the state. Due to certain conflicts between Indian National Congress and the National Congress, the coalition ended and governor’s rule was imposed for 105 days in 1977.

                              Click Above

Phase 4 (1977-1983): Fairest election years

In July 1977, Sheikh Abdullah’s party took a massive lead, marginalising Indian National Congress and other parties. Sheikh Abdullah remained as the Chief Minister of the state of Jammu and Kashmir for 5 years, then his son Farookh was replaced in place of Sheikh because of the death of Sheikh Abdullah. The arrival of Farookh, brought a little increase in communal politics as the Jammu and Kashmir liberation front and Muslim United Front were gaining momentum but anyhow In June 1983, Farookh led National Conference swept assembly elections with a comfortable majority.

Phase 5 (1983-1987): Rise in Insurgency

After winning a good number of seats in Jammu and Kashmir, Farookh started raising the issue of autonomy tampered between (1953-1975) and demanded the return of autonomy to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, these things led to the dismissal of his government because Farookh’s brother-in-law Ghulam Shah split himself and formed a government by allying with the Indian National Congress. Ghulam Shah was famous for being a puppet of the Indian Government, he was known as the ‘curfew Chief Minister’.

Meanwhile, Farookh became a leader who vehemently opposed the Union government, but in 1986 Farookh again became the Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir allying with the Indian National Congress (INC), this thing conveyed a bad message to the people of Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan also started sponsoring insurgency and militant training to the youth of Kashmir, which was evident from operation Tupac launched under the leadership of President Zia-Ul-Haq of Pakistan, but this didn’t last long due to the death of the President.

The unholy alliance of National Conference-Indian National Congress became untrustworthy in Jammu and Kashmir because Farookh failed in providing education and economic stability in the state. Though the National Conference-Indian National Congress (32+6) again formed an alliance in 1987 but this time communal politics got increased as the MUF (Muslim united front) also had an increase in the number of seats, by which they started the demand of representation of backward Muslims, these things created disturbed harmony.

Phase 6 (1987-1996): Insurgency, militancy and political instability

After the 1987 assembly elections, though National conference and Indian National Congress formed an alliance and remained in power, there were many parties like the Muslim United Front and Jammu and Kashmir liberation front (JKLF) which propagated communal hatred, in the same way, the Rashtriya Swayam Sangh and Bhartiya Janta Party, started raising slogans like Ek jhanda, Ek samvidhan (One flag, One Constitution) and started influencing Hindus and Sikhs of Jammu and Ladakh region because the government failed to provide necessary opportunities and security to the Locals, this lead to increase in inequality within the valley.

One the other hand the cold war came to an end leaving the Afghan rebels no work, Kashmir shared borders with Pakistan and Afghanistan, Now Pakistan started sponsoring the youth to take training from the Afghan Rebels and to some extent Pakistan helped these rebels to create militancy in the valley, these all things led to the exodus of Kashmiri Pandits in the region. Also, the spread of Wahabism in the valley charged the Indian Kashmiri youth to go for Militancy. 

Following this event, the Indian Government increased the number of troops of the Indian Army in Jammu and Kashmir, especially the Kashmir valley, the Indian Government also imposed AFSPA (Armed Forces Special Powers Act) which gave enormous powers to the military. The instability was evident when parties in Jammu and Kashmir refused to participate in parliamentary elections of 1989, National Conference was an exception so it won all the three seats.

After 1989 the demonstrations of Azaadi (freedom) started, in 1990 the legislative assembly got dissolved leading to Presidential rule till 1996. During this period the PAK (Pakistan)-Taliban sponsored militancy spread to a large extent, the Indian Army also gave deterrent responses which led to many human right violation cases (reports by amnesty and other organisations), these all identity politics and global intervention that led to AFSPA hampered state’s tourism and state’s economy but tensions de-escalated when Prime Minister Narasimha Rao in 1995 made a statement in parliament that Article 370 will not be abrogated and that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and that he wanted President’s rule to end.

Phase 7 (1996-2008): Air of hope

The Kashmiris were also badly afflicted with the insurgency and human right violations in the Jammu and Kashmir, so they wanted and demanded better conditions for themselves which was evident from their participation in assembly elections and parliamentary elections of 1996, National conference allied with the BJP ( Bhartiya Janta Party) when Atal Bihari came to power as he wanted to restore credibility in the valley, this was evident from the three words Jamhooriyat, Insaniyat, Kashmiriyat. But again, due to the Kargil War 1999, the relations between India and Pakistan and the Lahore Declaration lost impetus.

The Indian National Congress meanwhile was gaining momentum in Jammu and Kashmir because it emerged as a party which was aloof from communal politics, also a new party named the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) gained momentum after 1999, the rise of both the parties was evident from the win of PDP-INC in legislative assembly elections 2002.

After 2004, Indo-Pak relations stabilised as Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh met Pakistan’s President General Parvez Musharraf. Though there existed clashes between armed forces and militants, that didn’t take place on a large scale. Also, the GDP (Gross domestic product) of Jammu and Kashmir took a significant growth from 2004 to 2011, but things after 2008 changed.

Phase 8 (2008- 2018): Resurgence

In 2008 happened the ‘Amarnath Land Dispute’, where the government of India agreed with the Government of Jammu and Kashmir (Ghulam Nabi Azad was the CM) to transfer 99 acres of land to Amarnath Temple, the PDP (people’s democratic party) didn’t agree to this and broke the coalition leading to coming down of the government in Jammu and Kashmir, this again led to the regeneration of communal politics in Jammu and  Kashmir, also the calls for abrogation of the article started taking place across the nation, youth in Jammu and Kashmir again started to resort towards militancy, corruption increased in the valley and financial irregularities were also observed.

When Narendra Modi came to power in 2014, he wanted to develop relations with Pakistan which was evident when he called Pakistan’s Prime Minister to his oath ceremony and his surprise visit to Pakistan. But terrorist attacks and killing of Army men in the valley and the situation after 2016 i.e. killing of Burhan Wani (young militant) escalated tensions in the valley to a large extent, due to which the Governor’s rule was imposed after November 2018. After the Pulwama Attack in February 2019, calls for abrogation increased vehemently across the nation, massive win of BJP in 2019 parliamentary elections paved way for the fulfilment of promises.

Some scholars analyse that the abrogation of Article 370 is linked with the Americans leaving Afghanistan leading to recognition of Taliban in Afghanistan, the Modi government predicted that America would be withdrawing from Afghanistan completely which it did in march 2020 by signing a pact with Taliban. Trump’s offering to mediate alongside Pakistan in 2019 made things clear for the Indian Government to change the script of Jammu and Kashmir.

How the government abrogated Article 370

By the Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) order 2019 (C.O 272), the government replaced the word “constituent assembly” to Legislative assembly in clause 3 of Article 370. Clause 3 states that the President can cease the operation of Article 370, provided that recommendation of the constituent assembly is necessary. The Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir was dissolved in 1956 without recommending anything. The government added clause 4 in Article 367 of the Constitution of India which meant that the recommendation made by the governor to the President shall be construed as a recommendation of the ministers and legislative assembly. Thus, by the virtue of clause 3 of Article 370, the President of India ceased the operation of Article 370, treating the recommendation by the governor as a recommendation by the legislative assembly.

Role of Judiciary

The government may contend the issue of Abrogation as a matter of public policy because in cases like R. C. Cooper vs Union of India (1970). The Apex court of India has decided that the court does have the power to strike down a law on the ground of authority, but the court will not sit in appeal over a public policy of the parliament in enacting a law. Again, in Premium Granite vs State of T. N. (1994) the court clarified that it cannot entertain a challenge to the wisdom or efficacy of the law or policy. (Kumar 2019)

But it would be difficult for the Indian Government because the Supreme court in cases like Rehman Shagoo vs State of Jammu and Kashmir (1960) and Sampat Prakash vs the State of Jammu and Kashmir (1968) has clarified and upheld the legal status of Jammu and Kashmir. Moreover, the Supreme Court in 2018 has said that the Article 370 has acquired permanent status because of its existence since many years, also the Constituent Assembly of the State got dissolved in 1956 without making any recommendations, making its abrogation impossible. Now it is up to the Judiciary to decide the fate of Constitutional Orders passed on August 5, 2019.

Conclusion

I have observed that Jammu and Kashmir’s autonomy before 1952 was not a new concept in the world as the US followed this kind of federal concept and the Chinese too followed this concept in terms of Hong Kong. 

I have also observed that the governments which had or have a good majority in parliament tend to use the security theory concept i.e. storming the military to the state of Jammu and Kashmir, keeping things fully under Union’s control. Meanwhile, the governments with flexible numbers in Parliament have resorted to peace theory concept, where these governments have provided financial stability to the state as well as better interlocutory approach, which has led to de-escalation in militancy and insurgency in the valley,

I have observed that investment which took place in the form of bridges, etc in the valley was mainly done to benefit military movement in the Valley.

I have observed that Article 370 was something which had to go one day because it was a strategy which was used to gain the confidence of the Muslim dominated province to accede to India because that accession proved to be an outcome which rejected the two-nation theory and followed India’s principles and Kashmir’s accession to India was important strategically i.e. for security purposes. On November 27, 1963, Prime Minister Nehru made a speech in Parliament and I quote- “There is no doubt that Kashmir is fully integrated. We feel that this process of gradual erosion of article 370 is going on. We should allow it to go on. We don’t want to take the initiative in this matter and completely put an end to Article 370.”

I have also observed that the amendment to Article 370 by the government might do a bit harm to India’s international reputation, but this has not changed the position of India, and so the government should be careful while inviting any kind of delegation to visit the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, internet lockdowns, etc. As these things would gain the attention of the International media which will then refute our adamant domestic argument towards Jammu and Kashmir.

I, thus conclude by providing a view that a much more humane approach should be followed towards the people of Jammu and Kashmir because if we are following deterrent methods to keep things in control then I shall recall the quote “An Eye for an Eye, will make the world blind”.

Endnotes

The speech of Gopalaswamy Ayyangar has been taken from Constituent Assembly of India Debates (Proceedings) – Volume X, Monday, the 17th October 1949 on Article 306A retrieved from Loksabhaph.nic.in. 

References

Agrawala, Jai Shankar. “Article 370 of the Constitution- A genesis”, Economic and Political Weekly (2015), Vol. L, No. 16, Pg. 25-27.

Ahmed, Ali. “Approaching Kashmir through Theoretical Lenses”, Economic & Political Weekly (2019), vol LIV no. 47, pp. 10-12.

Ankit, Rakesh. “the (Un)Making of Article 370”, Reviewed Work(s): Article 370: A Constitutional History of Jammu and Kashmir by A G Noorani, Economic and Political Weekly (2012), Vol. 47, No. 6, pp. 33-35.

Chowdhary, Rekha and Rao, V. Nagendra. “Jammu and Kashmir: Political Alienation, Regional Divergence and Communal Polarisation”, Journal of Indian School of Political Economy (2OO3), VOL. 15 NOS. l&2, pp 189-219.

Das, Taraknath. “The Kashmir Issue and the United Nations”, The Academy of Political Science, Political Science Quarterly (1950), Vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 264-282.

Dhar, Ashok: “Kashmir needs empathy for integration of hearts and minds” (Sep 21, 2019), Observer Research Foundation, Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org.

DN. “Kashmir and India”, Economic and Political Weekly (1991), Vol. 26, No. 34, pp. 1959-1961.

Engineer, Asghar Ali. “Can Autonomy Be a Solution”, Economic and Political Weekly (2000), Vol. 35, No. 27, pp. 2359-2360.

Hilali, Z. “Kashmir: Emerging Nuclear Threat in South Asia”, Institute of International Relations, NGO, Perspectives (2001), No. 16, pp. 34-56.

Hoskote and Hoskote. “Jammu & Kashmir & The Politics of Article 370: Seeking Legality for The Illegitimate, People”, International Journal of Social Sciences ISSN 2454-5899 (2017), Special Issue Volume 3, Issue 1, pp. 813 -835.

Iwanek, Krzysztof: “New Delhi’s recent Kashmir policy has hurt its international reputation but not its real position”, (2020, March 02), Observer Research Foundation, Retrieved from www.orfonline.org. 

Jamwal Shailendra. “Article 370 – Its Genesis and Reactions in Jammu and Kashmir State”, Proceedings of the Indian History Congress (1993), Vol. 54, pp. 467-471.

Kumar, Ashwani. “the Constitutional legitimacy of abrogating Article 370”, Economic and Political Weekly (2019), Vol. LIV No. 38, Pg. 14-16.

Malik, Ashok. “Jammu-Kashmir and Ladakh: Exploring a New Paradigm”, ORF Special Report No. 94, Observer Research Foundation (2019).

Moraes, Frank. “Jawaharlal Nehru a biography” (1956), the shadow of Kashmir (Chapter), Jaico Publishing House; First edition in 2007.

Narain, Akanksha, “Revival of Violence in Kashmir: The Threat to India’s Security”, International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research, Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses (2016), Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 15-20.

 Pal, Khagendra. “The Relations Between the Indian Union and The State of Jammu and Kashmir”, The Indian Journal of Political Science (1953), Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 333-346.

Peer, Gazala and Rahman, Javedur. “An Unpleasant Autonomy: Revisiting the Special Status for Jammu and Kashmir”, Economic and Political Weekly (2012), Vol. 47, No. 23, pp. 72-75.

Rasool, Irfan. “Jammu and Kashmir: A Confederate within a Federal System”, Economic and Political Weekly (2014), Vol. 49, No. 4, pp. 68-73.

Sathe, S. “Article 370: Constitutional Obligations and Compulsions”, Economic and Political Weekly (1990), Vol. 25, No. 17, pp. 932-933.

Shankar, Mahesh. “Nehru’s legacy in Kashmir: Why a plebiscite never happened”, India Review (2016), 15 (1): 1–21, doi:10.1080/14736489.2016.1129926

Sharma, Manju and Wani, Feroz. “Milestones & Accidental Prozones of Kashmir Polity: A Tragedy of Strategy”, The Indian Journal of Political Science (2012), Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 699-712.

Wani, Ayjaz. “The Kashmir Conflict: Managing Perceptions and Building Bridges to Peace”, Observer Research Foundation Issue Brief No. 261 (2018).

Bibliography

‘Sardar Patel was actually the architect of Article 370’: Historian Srinath Raghavan on Kashmir, (Scroll.in on Oct 10, 2019)

Constitution (application to Jammu and Kashmir) order 1954

Constitution (application to Jammu and Kashmir) order 2019 (C.O. 272)

Constitution (application to Jammu and Kashmir) order 2019 (C.O. 273)

Constitution of India, 1950.

Delhi agreement 1952

Indira-Sheikh accord 1975

Lahore Declaration 1999

Simla Agreement 1972

Vakasha Sachdev (2019, august 16), Stop with the Fake News, Article 370 was NOT a Temporary Provision, the quint.

LawSikho has created a telegram group for exchanging legal knowledge, referrals and various opportunities. You can click on this link and join:

https://t.me/joinchat/J_0YrBa4IBSHdpuTfQO_sA

Follow us on Instagram and subscribe to our YouTube channel for more amazing legal content.

The post Revisiting the dynamic power politics in Jammu and Kashmir appeared first on iPleaders.

Revisiting the dynamic power politics in Jammu and Kashmir published first on https://namechangers.tumblr.com/

UP Madarsa Board Result 2020 declared, check pass percentage, awards planned and other details

UP Madarsa Board Result 2020 declared, check pass percentage, awards planned and other details

[ad_1]

The Uttar Pradesh Board of Madarsa Education’s (UPBME) declared results for Munshi, Maulvi (equivalent to secondary), Alim (equivalent to senior secondary), Kamil (equivalent to graduation) and Fazil (equivalent to post graduation) exams for 2020, here on Wednesday.

The UP Government has announced that the meritorious students would be given Rs 1 lakh cheque, a tablet and a certificate…

View On WordPress

Indian Army JCO Result 2020 RT JCO Religious Teacher Result Date Cut Off Merit List @ joinindianarmy.nic.in

Indian Army JCO Result 2020 RT JCO Religious Teacher Exam Result Date Cut Off Marks and Merit List Pdf : Indian Army RT JCO Result 2020 or Indian Army Religious Teacher [ Dharm Shikshak / Dharma Guru – Pandit Pandit (Gorkha), Granthi, Molvi (Sunni), Maulvi (Shia), Padre and Bodh Monk ) Exam Result 2020 Selection List Pdf download facility to be available for @ http://www.joinindianarmy.nic.in.…

View On WordPress

What Is Vashikaran and How it can be Used To Improve Relationships?

Vashikaran can be used to improve relations that have gone sour for example the separation between husband and wife due to any reason, sudden misunderstanding, and distancing between two lovers or else someone saying no to marriage after a commitment. However, if you have just looked a person once or twice and you are not aware of the nature, habits, and surroundings of the person in question, practicing vashikaran on such a person may bounce back with negative results.

If you practice vashikaran mantra on any person, the effect of the technique remains forever on the person and your relations get improved for a lifetime. But, in case, you had tried the remedy of vashikaran from some astrologer, tantric, or maulvi, but you got no results and love vashikaran specialist seemed to have no effect whatsoever, it was due to the practitioner and not due to the technique itself.

Vashikaran specialist provide techniques are very effective and give the best solution of your problem in today's busy world. With the help, you can lead your life hassle free.

Wastania, Fauqania, Alim, Maulvi Exam Date, Time Table, Routine

Wastania, Fauqania, Alim, Maulvi Exam Date, Time Table, Routine JAC Board 2019

JAC (Jharkhand Academic Council) Ranchi Published Notification for wastania, fauqania, alim & maulvi exam routine on 3rd July 2019 in various newspaper across Jharkhand State. Around 2 Lakh Students are enrolled for the JAC Madarsa Board Examination 2019 from all over the district across jharkhand.

  Wastania Exam Routine JAC Madarsa Board 2019

Wastania Exam will be start from July 15, 2019. Wastania is JAC Board exam of Class 8 which is Madarsa Board Exams across the nation. Exam will be held in two phase i.e Sitting 1, 9:45 am to 1:00 pm and Sitting 2, 2:00 pm to 5:00 pm. Each Subject contains 100 Full Marks, The routine is given Below: Subjects Event Deeniyat, Arabic 1 July 15, 2019 (Monday) Arabic 2, Urdu July 16, 2019 (Tuesday) Persian, English July 17, 2019 (Wednesday) Social Science, Mathematics July 18, 2019 (Thursday) Hindi, Science July 19, 2019 (Friday) Candidates are requested to reach their exam centre before 30 minutes, Wastania Exam centre will be printed in JAC Madarsa Board Admit card, which will be available from July 09, 2019.

Fauqania Exam Routine JAC Madarsa Board 2019

Fauqania exam will be held on July 15, 2019, 50 thousand students are registred for the JAC madarsa board examination 2019, Fauqania Exam is like Matriculation Board Exam i.e class 10 board exam. Fauqania exam routine of JAC Madrasa Board 2019 is given below: Subjects Event Deeniyat 1, Deeniyat 2 July 15, 2019 (Monday) Arabic, Urdu July 16, 2019 (Tuesday) Hindi, Persian July 17, 2019 (Wednesday) English, Mathematics July 18, 2019 (Thursday) Science, Social Science July 19, 2019 (Friday) each subject carry of 100 (hundred marks) Passing marks is 330, there is ten subjects in Fauqania Jac Board Examination. Also Check JAC Board Class 8,9,11 Result 2019.

Maulvi Exam Routine JAC Madarsa Board 2019

This exam will be start on same day, this exam is 11 Board exam, Madarsa Board always conduct Board Exam from class 8 to 12 across the nation, which was established before Mughal Empire! JAC Madarsa Board was established on 04 March 2003 along with JAC Board. Maulvi Exam time table is given below: Subjects Event Deeniyat 1, Deeniyat 2 July 15, 2019 (Monday) Arabic 1, Arabic 2 July 16, 2019 (Tuesday) Hindi, Urdu July 17, 2019 (Wednesday) Persian, English 1 July 18, 2019 (Thursday) English 2, Tarikh-e-islam (History) July 19, 2019 (Friday) Maulvi exam will be separate examination, JAC Madrsa board Registered 40k, Forty Thousand + Regular students in Maulvi Across the nation.

Alim Exam Routine JAC Madarsa Board 2019

Candiates must ensure that their Exam centre and seat before the exam start, candidates are requested to use blue/black ball pen in the JAC Board 12 Examination 2019, Alim exam routine is given below: Subjects Event Deeniyat 1, Deeniyat 2 July 15, 2019 (Monday) Deeniyat 3, Arabic 1 July 16, 2019 (Tuesday) Arabic 2, Arabic 3 July 17, 2019 (Wednesday) English 1, English 2 July 18, 2019 (Thursday) Hindi, Urdu July 19, 2019 (Friday) Urdu 1/Persian 1, Urdu 2/Persian 2 July 20, 2019 (Saturday) Group - A, Group - B July 22, 2019 (Monday) Candidates must carry their admit card, if lost your admit card they may request to their Madarsa/School/College/institute for JAC Mardarsa Board Admit Card 2019. JAC Madarsa Board Admit Crad Mentioned Details Candidate Name Candidate Father Name & Mother Name Candidate Photo & Signature Madarsa name Exam Centre Name Subjects Name Hidayat (Instrucation) JAC Madarsa Board Wastania, Fauqania, Maulvi, Alim Exam FAQs What i will carry for the JAC Madarsa Board Exam? Ans. Admit Card, Instrument Box, Lunch box If i lost My JAC Madrasa Board Admit card Can I get again? Ans. Yes you can get your lost admit card by asking your madarsa, They will provide admit card. When will exam start for wastania, fauqania, maulvi, alim? Ans. Exam will be start from july 15 2019. When will Result declare for the JAC Madarsa Board Exam? Ans. Result will be declare in the month of August 2019. Can i use electronic device in examination centre hall?  Ans. electronic decive are not allowed to carry! Please read JAC Board Admit card Hidayat (instruction) Read the full article