Tumgik
#the plaintiffs
mrsoulstice · 26 days
Text
♾️😂
30 notes · View notes
unpretty · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
the thing it's easy to miss if you're not really following the damages trial in connecticut--if you're just seeing the highlight videos or headlines about the latest dumb bullshit alex did--is the overall context.
the majority of the trial is not alex grandstanding or his defense doing something dumb as shit that you can point and laugh at. the majority of the trial is people who've suffered at the hands of alex jones. people who lost family, lost children. the majority of the trial is listening to parents talk about how their autistic son finally managed to swallow his vitamins that morning, or their daughter forget to turn back and wave goodbye. the ways they tried to turn to activism or charity to make something, anything positive, out of the murder of their loved ones.
and then they explain about the hatemail they get. how they had to move and never tell anyone what happened to their family. how they moved into a cul-de-sac so they could monitor traffic and got a security system and can't ever leave any doors unlocked, not even for as long as it takes to get the mail or put a cart back at the grocery store. how people they've never met will scream at them when they find out who they are and where they live. how people who think they're actors mail them pictures of dead children to show them what it 'really' looks like. how they can't put up memorials to their murdered children.
and after all that, after hours and days of that. that's when alex jones gets up and talks about how he's done apologizing and this is a show trial and the judge is infringing on his right to free speech by not allowing him to defend himself, refusing to shut up while his lawyer objects to statements being made by his own client. after all that is when alex jones goes on his show to lie about what happened in court to sell more vitamins and show off his latest meme about the judge.
3K notes · View notes
arom-antix · 4 months
Text
Tumblr media
Happy birthday to the man, the myth, the legend, trophy husband of Yuuri Katsuki, Viktor Nikiforov!
81 notes · View notes
munkkyprime · 4 months
Text
We need more Optimuses... Optimi? To have ear fins that move even just a little when he's surprised, angry and or sad.
72 notes · View notes
littlelovelore · 17 days
Text
Tumblr media
here to rule on the case of
"too cute vs too sassy"
25 notes · View notes
kiefbowl · 3 months
Text
I'm reading a number of cases where beneficiaries of a life insurance policy are seeking accidental death payout after the death of a loved one involving substances, and I've only read 7 of them which isn't even the tip of the ice burg, but every single one so far has been when a man died and his wife or mother is the beneficiary, and it just got me thinking if there's any data out there about whether insurance companies are more likely to pay out male beneficiaries than female ones. maybe not, but it would be interesting to see the data.
26 notes · View notes
thecowboymartyr · 8 months
Text
71 notes · View notes
noirandchocolate · 7 months
Text
Appellants’ Brief: Contains no preliminary statement outlining the issues in the case and instead jumps straight into describing complicated real property subdivisions and variance applications while speaking as though I should know who all the dozen parties are already.
Me: *with growing frustration* Why are you telling me this? Who are you? What is the significance? What the fuck are you even mad at??
28 notes · View notes
lestatmorelikeletsnot · 2 months
Text
One of my favorite Book Louis things:
Louis: I despised Lestat. He had absolutely nothing of value to impart. I knew that first night I was his superior in skill, trade, and refinement.
Daniel: whoa so you set out on your own
Louis: Well no. I couldn’t. What if he knew something I didn’t know! Besides, what Lestat wanted was Pointe de Lac. He spent MY money like it was going out of style.
Daniel: that sounds awful. What a leech.
Louis: I mean. I. Didn’t care about the house. Or the money. I actually voluntarily stayed in the oratory out back. Plus, his father was sick and needed care until he passed.
Daniel: ohhh so when his father died; that’s when you burnt the house and escaped!
Louis: no we, uh, we moved together to a new residence where we spent the next 60 years, as we had a child to raise. But eventually, Claudia orchestrated Lestat’s death and our departure.
Daniel: okay…well it’s great that Claudia also realized what he was and got you both out
Louis: I uh. Begged her not to.
Daniel: … 🙄✍️
19 notes · View notes
feeshies · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
Be very careful when you name your company. Because someday, a tired law student might have to shorten it to “BM” in his notes
23 notes · View notes
sebibibebi · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media
addressing the allegations. @andreagrimes
4 notes · View notes
klondikeart · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
I drew my goat today Also unrelated did you know a plaintiff is not a lawyer
15 notes · View notes
woolandcoffee · 6 months
Text
I'm reading this truly awful court decision right now, and the contempt with which the judge is speaking about a group of plaintiffs that represented farm workers who were concerned about links discovered between a widely used pesticide and neuro-developmental damage in their children is truly nauseating.
6 notes · View notes
Text
The palestinian representation in American academia (specifically secondary education) is so miniscule but somehow zionist organizations find them and use all their power to get them fired. There are actual anti semitic professors racist professors we have all encountered these type of professors and students contact administration and outside organizations for help to fire those professors and it does nothing BUT if they're palestinian and u got tweets where they talk about zionism then it is much easier to smear them on social media to the point that the university is likely to fire them out of pressure, no just and independent investigation into the claims
Tumblr media Tumblr media
29 notes · View notes
Not going anon because I said what I said. Gege has stressed me out so much that my hair is thinning and I haven’t eaten in 40 days and 40 nights.
You said what you said, and you spoke on behalf of the people. Gege is truly a menace to society. We will make Gege pay for their atrocities ‼️
3 notes · View notes
Text
Tumblr media
A sham case has its day in court.
March 27, 2024
ROBERT B. HUBBELL
It appears that the Supreme Court will reverse a lower court ban on mifepristone—meaning that the drug will continue to be available to women nationally. Based on the comments from the justices at Tuesday’s hearing, the only question is which rationale the Supreme Court will adopt in reversing the national ban issued by Judge Kacsmaryk in Texas. (The Supreme Court previously stayed Kacsmaryk’s national ban, pending argument and decision in the case of FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine).
The outcome is hugely consequential and represents a major victory for proponents of reproductive liberty. But before discussing the merits, another consequential aspect of this decision deserves attention: The case challenging mifepristone had no business being in the federal courts, much less on the Supreme Court docket. It should have been dismissed at the outset—and the lawyers who filed the case should have been sanctioned for bringing bad-faith litigation. The legal theory on which the case stands is a sham based on lies.
An urgent question for the judiciary is how a sham case made it to the Supreme Court’s docket. The answer is that it did so because the Supreme Court continues to coddle, humor, and occasionally reward a cohort of reactionary Federalist Society judges. That cabal is intent on manipulating the judicial system to achieve policy goals that the Christian right cannot secure at the ballot box or in state and federal legislatures—the traditional democratic means of enacting policy.
As explained below, the Supreme Court should issue a sharp rebuke to Judge Kacsmaryk and the plaintiffs’ lawyers, who conspired to gin up a case where none existed by alleging imagined injuries that no person claims to have actually suffered. But, it is unthinkable that the milquetoast Chief Justice will summon the courage and leadership to issue the much-needed rebuke. Instead, Justice Roberts will ignore the elephant in the room—bad faith litigation—and thereby encourage more of it.
Such bad faith litigation is not costless. For more than a year, women, their partners, and health care providers have been unsure about the continued availability and legality of the most widely used drug for miscarriage and abortion care. That uncertainty can dissuade women and men from attempting to conceive or planning to terminate a pregnancy. It is reprehensible that a single federal judge would presume to ban a safe and effective drug that has been on the market for more than two decades because of the fabricated objections of a handful of physicians.
Such sham suits also undermine the credibility of the federal judiciary and waste scarce judicial resources—including those of the Supreme Court.
Will John Roberts rouse the Court to reprimand Kacsmaryk and the sham plaintiffs? Or will the Court reverse the ban on procedural grounds that will merely kick the can down the road, thereby encouraging Kacsmaryk to try again?
We need not waste our time hoping for John Roberts to do the right thing. That opportunity expired a decade ago with Shelby County v. Holder. Rather, we should focus on gaining control in the House and the Senate and reelecting Joe Biden. At that point, expanding the Supreme Court can be accomplished with a majority vote in Congress and the signature of the president.
The current Court is not up to the task of preserving and implementing the Constitution. We deserve a Court that is. Vote like your democracy depends on it.
Robert B. Hubbell Newsletter
2 notes · View notes