#terms of service fandom
Text
costco introduction?!? woah no way
name: costco. or matt or drew. it depends on who you are to me.
pronouns: it/its or they/them, he/him is ok. arospec. in two qprs. pronoun page.
basic facts: im pretty much the best, most talented, strongest, funniest guy ever. bit of a superiority complex, that’s what the therapists say but you don’t need to listen to them. the batman 2022 special interest, let me talk at you about it. i like really shitty music too. @ straightdennis kinnie 🤞🤞🤞 im a minor. adhd king.
things i like: batman (in general), community nbc, its always sunny, mlp: fim, steven universe, my friends, knives 👍, weezer, car seat headrest, of Montreal, harvey danger, mike krol. tag me in stuff w/ blood or costco if you want.
links: pinterest, twitter, costco playlist, pronoun page, sideblog masterlist, spouse list
mutuals can ask to join the discord server.
click this to watch my favorite video ever. not a rickroll cause i’m better than that.
the tranny barnzalez explanation for those who need it.
exclusionists dni. lesboys and turigirls and everyone else is welcome.
if you read all this congratulations you’re now a certified costggot and we are kissing on the mouth.
#community#community nbc#nbc community#paul dano#danonation#community tv#danonator#the fic™️#twink costco not canon#troy barnes/danny gonzales#tranny barnzalez#terms of service fandom#gif#blinkies#intro post
97 notes
·
View notes
Text
i love opt out but every time i see the words opt out my brain reads 'cop out' and 6up 5oh starts playing in my head
50 notes
·
View notes
Text
@us-costco-official
@biblicallyaccurateautism
Anyone remember tos random...our humble yet oddly creative beggingings that lasted all of two days.....
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
can the terms of service fandom please chill out? privacy policy and privacy settings are RELATED. just stop. pr1vacy squared is incest.
22 notes
·
View notes
Text
tbh
privacy settings is overrated, opt out n payment terms on top
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
hey guys, new to the tos fandom but why does no one talk about acceptable usage? their character development was amazing and they might’ve been the best character, could just be me though
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
i fucking hate the TOS fandom. this is not what the creator would have wanted.
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
Dear Transformers Fandom,
Anybody else getting spammed to hell and back with non related posts flooding the transformers tag? I'm getting everything from generative AI (ew), p0rn bots (double ew), to completely random mass posts of like nature photography but tagged with transformers and other fandoms.
I hate having to use the report/block system so often just to be able to get the giant robot fix for the day.
Sincerely,
A Very Tired Fellow Fan
#transformers#maccadam#fandom#tag spamming#it is literally in the terms of service that posting with non related tags is considered spamming and repeat offenders can be banned#absolutely infuriating#stuff cell says
35 notes
·
View notes
Text
jesus fucking christ. the terms of service fandom could not be more toxic. privacy policy and privacy settings are RELATED! even if its not explicitly stated, THEY ARE SIBLINGS. they have the same first name ffs! these new tos fans just want to ship two guys. god fuck the tos fandom.
73 notes
·
View notes
Text
some people really misinterpret opt out's character and try to shove him into fanon archetypes. too tired to make an entire post about it but it srsly pisses me off 😭
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
i don’t like getting involved in jegulus top/bottom discourse because frankly i do not care that much BUT i saw something that was like “james is actually a bottom because he’s a brat” and idk i’m begging everyone to stop thinking sub is synonymous with bottom and dom with top
#i feel like i see this a lot more in this fandom than most i’ve been in#have u ever heard the term service top? power bottom?#also they can be switches without totally flipping the dynamics they like in bed every time they switch lol#and vice versa#idk idk it’s not the serious#i’ve just noticed it more and more recently
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
someone follows me and I check their blog and see that theyre an adult but also have "tmnt fan service" in their description..... side eyeing you very hard. but that could mean many things ig. squints
#theyre still teens lmao. 'fan service' is such a vauge term so idk what exactly they mean#but ive seen some shit in my time in the tmnt fandom#egg.txt#has 'bonezone' in the title. says minors dni but apparently is a tmnt fan blog (no posts yet). red flags but not enough to actually#make a judgement
7 notes
·
View notes
Text
“usually you’re really into fandoms, are you in any now???” actually no. the only show I’ve been watching is people who have voluntarily gone alone into butt fuck nowhere nature with minimal camping supplies and skills to see who stays the longest and make fun of every macho cop/army man who bailed after talking big about how they’ll win the half mill
#prsnl#my streaming services are super limited#I don’t want to look at my computer after working#tv only and I can’t cast to my tv#so I’ve just been like. not doing much#in terms of anything fandom or creative
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Warning/Ratings of AO3 Fics
I was skimming over some of AO3′s ToS today and came across these specific passages (link to page included at bottom for those who wish for full context, albeit I tried to quote widely enough not to confuse or bias anything)
As a rule, the creator controls the warnings.
Selecting "choose not to use Archive warnings," or the equivalent text as specified on the creator upload form, satisfies a creator's obligation under the warnings policy. If a fanwork uses this option, we will not sustain any failure-to-warn complaints.
and, a few paragraphs later...
1. The meaning of "choose not to use Archive warnings" or equivalent text:
The fanwork may or may not contain any of the subject matter on the Archive list. Users who wish to avoid specific elements entirely should not access fanworks marked with "choose not to use Archive warnings." A creator can select both "choose not to use Archive warnings" and one of the Archive warnings in order to warn for some but not all of the Archive warnings.
Is it kind of authors to tag specific warnings or triggers? Yes.
Equally, are they, within certain bounds, obligated to? No.
AO3 does generally “defer” to creators (their verb) in terms of warnings and whether or not they are appropriate for content. They will, however, intervene where deemed necessary according the ToS that all users (with accounts or as guests, to my understanding) agree to upon opening an AO3 webpage, often with a recategorisation of a fic, from the sounds of it.
I just thought it was interesting to highlight, as we see a lot of debate around what is necessary to tag, and what exactly the “choose not to use warnings” tag can and should be used for.
(ref. https://archiveofourown.org/tos#IV.K. - sections 2 and 3 considered here, warnings and ratings respectively)
#fandom#ao3#ao3 mechanics#ao3 policy#ao3 terms of services#fandom etiquette#ao3 tags#choose not to use archive warning
21 notes
·
View notes
Text
ugh. privacy squared is so. gross.
5 notes
·
View notes
Last Seen Blogs
tatis9
Inside my head
captainelliecomb
Not a Real Captain
sp-ceghost-blog
honeybee
aphburgers
Symphony in P minor