"Katherine is also considered one of the greatest examples of a historical-fiction love story ever written. In a poll conducted in the 1990s by Ladies' Home Journal, the novel ranked among the top-ten all-time best love stories.
Weir was inspired by Katherine to become an author of historical fiction,[8][9] and the novel would also later inspire her non-fiction study, Katherine Swynford: The Story of John of Gaunt and his Scandalous Duchess (2008) (U.S. title, Mistress of the Monarchy, The Life of Katherine Swynford, Duchess of Lancaster). It examines Seton's novel in historiographic terms and, while praising its general historical accuracy, categorizes it as primarily a feminist romance."
I disagree with the idea that Katherine is a feminist romance. For me, Feminism 101 is Girl Power: celebrating women being good at masculine things- Girls Can Do What Boys Can Do. (Feminism 102 is celebrating women being good at feminine things AND masculine things- Girls Can Do What Boys Can Do And What Girls Were Doing Was Already Valuable).
As I said in my review of Katherine:
“Inclination and good taste” prevent Katherine from interfering in politics. It’s “men’s business” and she’s framed as better than that meddling realm-ruiner Alice Perrers (boo!hiss!)
That's not feminist. Anya Seton has failed Feminism 101.
Yes, it was published in 1954, but Elizabeth and the Prince of Spain was published in 1953 and was markedly more feminist, having a healthy respect for Elizabeth's intelligence and her political acumen. Her taking the throne is a Good Thing.
In the top 10 best love stories? One of the best historical-fiction love stories?
Nah. The love story isn't as much of a focus in the book as you'd expect. It needed more development and I think it was hindered by the un-feminist choice to make Katherine apolitical. If Katherine had more agency, if she was involved in the duke's business, if she was like his consigliere, then the relationship would be better fleshed out. And Katherine's lack of personality doesn't help the romance either. A truly great romantic novel is where the characters are great together, but they have personalities as stand alone characters. Katherine pales in comparison to Elizabeth Bennet or Jane Eyre.
4 notes
·
View notes
Here's my attempt on Laughingstock. I couldn't get them out of my head and I wanted to think of something cute to draw for them. So..... I drew Barnaby baking cookies.
And. Hear. Me. Out.
I explained a bit in one of @sweetstarart post where they drew Barnaby "Help" cook with Frank. (I honestly love how they draw Barnaby and the other characters.)
But I explained it as one of those nice childhood moments where you would bake or cook with your parent. So it can be the only thing that Barnaby mastered baking while growing up. And what would he bake? PEANUT BUTTER COOKIES!!!
My brain was like...... "What if Barnaby only knows how to bake cookies from Ms. Beagle but kept it a secret?" obviously later on, he lets Howdy know about his hidden talent because...... He's like that.
I say it like that because he canonly doesn't cook or bake because it's a "hassle" for him. But...... Sometimes it's fun to push away logic every once in a while.
My first mini comic doodle:
1(Howdy): "You're a mess......"
2(Barnaby): "So? I made cookies?"
3(Howdy): "Are they your ma's cookies?"
4(Barnaby): "Yes?"
5(Howdy): "Can I please have some?"
6(Barnaby): "Of course goof!"
13 notes
·
View notes
Finally started watching season 2 of the Leftovers, and I’m in a love-hate relationshp with Kevin’s character. On one hand, tormented cop who yells at people has got to be one of my least favourite type of characters. On the other hand, his long eyelashes and tendencies to get himself into situations have enraptured me. Also the fact that he’s being haunted by the ghost of a woman who’s just constantly calling him a loser and traumadumping on him is objectively funny, I cannot get enough of their dynamic.
3 notes
·
View notes