i love bands where the singer can’t sing but can convey emotions though their singing in a way that is impossible to describe. like yes u sing like an absolute dickhead but you are also somehow expressing exactly how i feel through the cracks in your voice

Blue Beetle and Batman versus the Thinker by Phil Moy

A short introduction of a Big Thinker- Meant to share, not to represent the wide fields he is dealing since the 1980s: Slavoj Zizek .

Platon dreamt of a state, led by philosophers and Zizek is kind of transposing this idea with the party Troika in Slovenia, together with two other philosophers.

Zizek, a critical and maybe unconventional thinker of our time, combing psychological methods of Lacan with the dialectic of Hegel (also Zizek tries to re-connect the Lacain rejection of philosophy). Making philosophy not only relevant in pop-cultural way, but also as a system of making an opinion in order to analyze the differences arousing in political conflicts, in historical-dialectic process. Zizek is opening discourse that is interlinking different disciplines, also connecting media as examples for underlining his point. Showing a critical understantment of happenings, that are often the product of ideology. Drawing attention of phenomena that is suppressed by media in order to let the audience in a dogmatic black-and-white-thinking, like an article published in the New York Times in 2014, where survivors of the Shoa are condemning 'the massacre of Palestinians in Gaza and the ongoing occupation and colonization of historic Palestine'. Likewise the paradox that whenever global finances crash, the stock markets register an upswing (quoting Yanis Varoufakis). Also that we do not live in a system of capitalism, more appropriate: In a Neo-Feudalism of Companies and that all groups that reject this system (mostly Islam influenced communites, but also indigenious folks..) are in the same breath presented in an anti-democratic behavior... Still I am shaked, when reading about the PR-work behind the justification of the Iraq-war and I recommend to read Zizek's work "The Borrowed Kettle" in which he is tracing the geo-political intentions behind this war. As Zizek emphasizes continously: The catastrophy has happened, but we haven't recognized. Prima facie it is some kind of uncomfortable to see and hear him speaking (touching his nose and snorting, speaking not fluently and his rhetoric skills…), when used to read him. So it was a mental work for me to 'comprehend' his theories without being extracted by those superficialities, as for my opinion, there was and is a link of fineness of in- and outside. But this is exactly the work and therapeutic aim behind Zizek, to accept our own discomfort, when hearing him, to look more into the deepness of some sentences, that seem to been thrown out a gut-feeling, but is more the work of critical analysis, not clinging into political directions of right and left, but showing the fatality in both. A stand point that is missed in the politcal discourse. It will stay a fragment to present all those enlightening ideas and summaries of Zizek, as he had also the time and experience to built his world-view around a historic-philosophic-psychological order. Not always I can agree on his ideas (e.g. ciritsing the criticers of Eurocentric methods as hypocratical, because in his opinion, the methods of critism are rooting in 'pure European thinking', but I have my problems by locating the human consciousness in one contitent, as we can not divide the reciproce influences from all time and areas, like the 'European heritage of Ancient Greece' would have been lost without the mental work in Toledo, also a wonderful proof in history how all religious were able to work together ; Also I miss a critical analysis of the Covid-pandemia in a Foucault-Bio-Power-way, not to negate the danger of the virus, but the methods of politcal practice.) But this is exactly what a good conversation must include, approach the 'truth' through discussions and disagreements.

Today’s Peterness is focused on his sexy legs.

Here’s part 1.

inspired by the fact that in the pictures in maverick’s hangar, teen bradley’s a brunet. obviously this is cuz they’re miles’ pictures but well

---

“so do you dye your hair now or was this part of your angsty phase i’ve heard so much about?”

jake raises the picture of bradley closer for inspection. the teenager in the picture is definitely his boyfriend—he has all the same facial features except for the mustache—but the second-most glaringly obvious difference is the fact that the curls peaking out from underneath his baseball cap are a dark brunet instead of the lighter honey color jake’s so accustomed to.

bradley laughs a little, hooking his chin over jake’s shoulder to see the picture for himself. “well, mav’s already shown you me as a baby, so i guess i have to admit that teenage-me was trying a little too hard to be cool.”

“a little? babe, c’mon you wanted to join the black parade so bad.”

maverick pipes up from just behind them. “do you want to see the pictures ice took after the first time he snuck out to a party? i’ve kept them for exactly this purpose.”

“the what?” jake asks, delighted.

bradley groans. “mav i thought you said the hangover was punishment enough.”

“oh, no baby goose, this punishment has been 20 years in the making.”

unfortunately for jake’s ever-growing blackmail stash against his boyfriend, they’re interrupted by a buzzing sound from bradley’s pocket. “phoenix,” he says, holding up the phone, “gotta take this.” he presses a kiss to jake’s temple before he crosses to the other side of the hangar.

jake’s attention drops back to the photo in his hand. some surly teenager with a major case of baby face, but also hints of the strong man he’d come to be. 

mav shifts to stand next to him. he gazes down at the picture, the sheen of nostalgia in his eyes. “i remember when we caught bradley with that stupid hair dye all over himself and half the bathroom. we made him scrub it off the tiles, but he was too proud of his new look to be really upset about it.”

jake looks back between the picture of teen bradley and mav, a little scrunch forming between his brow.

it’s funny because, well, a lot of how bradley appears now is all nick bradshaw—his hawaiian shirts, his mustache, his natural hair (though a few shades browner than it was as a child)—but when jake looks at the picture of young bradley with his dark, messy hair and then the man in front of him, well—

“he looks like you,” he finds himself saying. “in this picture, with the hair, and the way he stands, and the way he smiles. he’s so totally your kid.”

when he gets no response, he looks up. maverick’s eyebrows are raised, mouth slightly parted, but it appears jake has done what cyclone could only dream of: struck pete “maverick” mitchell silent.

“except for the height,” jake adds.

bradley chooses this time to wander back to them, situation with phoenix over and resolved. he hooks an arm around jakes waist and leans in, all close and easy. bradley turns towards maverick. “what’s wrong?” he asks at the look on his father’s face.

mav shakes himself a little. he looks at his son. he smiles.

“nothing,” he says.

do i post my long explanation of empathy vs sympathy re: roman tonight or is that just excessive

more character refs (some of which i definitely forgot about prior to now oops)

in order:

pic 1: Katsumi, Ikasuki, Hanae, Emi, Chiaki, and Fuku Kitsuen. some of them are human, some of them are kudagitsune.

pic 2: these guys are already labeled so i'll just specify that Susume, Sōta, and Tomomi are also from the Kitsuen family, but Kibara Migite is not. she's got her own shit going on lmao.

also not pictured is Sōta's human form, which he's in most the time as he also goes to school but i. just haven't gotten around to designing it yet (i keep accidentally making him look too similar to Hidemi oops-)

pic 3: these guys are also already labeled. they work for the funny organization :]

and then since the rest aren't compilation images i'll just list them separately:

Shūten and Iris Uso

as usual, oops i make a lot of characters lmao-

"Embarking on Enlightenment: A Journey through 'Initiation into Philosophy' by Émile Faguet"

Émile Faguet's "Initiation into Philosophy" serves as a captivating portal into the world of profound ideas and intellectual exploration. This literary gem not only educates but also enthralls, making the initiation into philosophy a thrilling adventure.

Faguet, with eloquence and insight, navigates the intricate landscapes of philosophical thought, presenting complex concepts in a manner accessible to both novices and seasoned philosophers. The book invites readers to ponder the fundamental questions that have shaped human understanding for centuries, sparking a delightful intellectual curiosity.

One of the book's strengths lies in its ability to demystify philosophy, transforming it from an abstract discipline into a vibrant and relevant exploration of life's most profound inquiries. Faguet's narrative style is both engaging and thought-provoking, creating a harmonious balance between scholarly depth and reader-friendly accessibility.

As readers traverse the pages, they encounter a rich tapestry of philosophical traditions, from ancient wisdom to modern theories, each contributing to the mosaic of human thought. Faguet masterfully weaves together key philosophical tenets, offering readers a panoramic view of the discipline's evolution while highlighting its enduring relevance to contemporary life.

The book's thematic organization allows for a seamless journey through the realms of metaphysics, ethics, and epistemology, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of philosophy's multifaceted nature. Faguet's insights into the works of notable philosophers add a layer of richness, transforming the book into a guide through the intellectual lineage of great thinkers.

"Initiation into Philosophy" is not merely a book; it is an odyssey that beckons readers to embrace the joy of intellectual discovery. Faguet's prose invites reflection, prompting readers to question, contemplate, and savor the intricacies of the philosophical landscape.

In conclusion, Faguet's "Initiation into Philosophy" is an intellectual feast that transcends the boundaries of time. With a captivating blend of erudition and accessibility, the book stands as an enduring testament to the timeless allure of philosophical inquiry, making it a must-read for anyone curious about the profound mysteries of existence.

Émile Faguet's "Initiation into Philosophy" is available in Amazon in paperback 12.99$ and hardcover 20.99$ editions.

Number of pages: 191

Language: English

Rating: 8/10                                           

Link of the book!

Review By: King's Cat

i get so flabbergasted when people are upset by christian themes in the work by a christian author…. bro you PICKED the BOOK!!!!

thought about all those incredible thinkers from history who died needlessly young and robbed humanity of their brilliance and got sad again :(

11 airplane songs!

Are you sure you don't have time for new music Kaylie?

11: Songs for looking out an airplane window

"Leonardo Dreams of His Flying Machine," Eric Whitacre

"Jupiter, Bringer of Jollity," Gustav Holst

"Across the Vast Eternal Sky," Ola Gjeilo

"These Two," Georgia Stitt

"Migratory V," Adam Guettal

"Wings of the Morning," John Rutter

"Empire of Angels," Thomas Bergersen

"Sparkle," Joe Hisaishi

"Sogno di Volare," Christopher Tin

Rodin’s Thinker, 3000.

The damaged Thinker, 3100.

Empire State Building in 3000.

Flash of Two Worlds by Mike Parobeck

"Embarking on Enlightenment: A Journey through 'Initiation into Philosophy' by Émile Faguet"

Émile Faguet's "Initiation into Philosophy" serves as a captivating portal into the world of profound ideas and intellectual exploration. This literary gem not only educates but also enthralls, making the initiation into philosophy a thrilling adventure.

Faguet, with eloquence and insight, navigates the intricate landscapes of philosophical thought, presenting complex concepts in a manner accessible to both novices and seasoned philosophers. The book invites readers to ponder the fundamental questions that have shaped human understanding for centuries, sparking a delightful intellectual curiosity.

One of the book's strengths lies in its ability to demystify philosophy, transforming it from an abstract discipline into a vibrant and relevant exploration of life's most profound inquiries. Faguet's narrative style is both engaging and thought-provoking, creating a harmonious balance between scholarly depth and reader-friendly accessibility.

As readers traverse the pages, they encounter a rich tapestry of philosophical traditions, from ancient wisdom to modern theories, each contributing to the mosaic of human thought. Faguet masterfully weaves together key philosophical tenets, offering readers a panoramic view of the discipline's evolution while highlighting its enduring relevance to contemporary life.

The book's thematic organization allows for a seamless journey through the realms of metaphysics, ethics, and epistemology, providing readers with a comprehensive understanding of philosophy's multifaceted nature. Faguet's insights into the works of notable philosophers add a layer of richness, transforming the book into a guide through the intellectual lineage of great thinkers.

"Initiation into Philosophy" is not merely a book; it is an odyssey that beckons readers to embrace the joy of intellectual discovery. Faguet's prose invites reflection, prompting readers to question, contemplate, and savor the intricacies of the philosophical landscape.

In conclusion, Faguet's "Initiation into Philosophy" is an intellectual feast that transcends the boundaries of time. With a captivating blend of erudition and accessibility, the book stands as an enduring testament to the timeless allure of philosophical inquiry, making it a must-read for anyone curious about the profound mysteries of existence.

Émile Faguet's "Initiation into Philosophy" is available in Amazon in paperback 12.99$ and hardcover 20.99$ editions.

Number of pages: 191

Language: English

Rating: 8/10                                           

Link of the book!

Review By: King's Cat

A Postmodern reading of Art

What is art in a postmodern reading?  I have made two approaches to reading they are the Prospero complex and the Promethean complex.

Prospero complex is the presence of literal meaning and Prometheus complex is the cultural, literary, philosophical and biographical meaning.

For a postmodern reading of art, I am taking my own painting called Deconstructing Rodin’s thinker.

A Prospero complex of it would be a head with the heart sign on it. And this is the literal meaning of it.

A Prometheus complex reading of it would be cultural, literary, philosophical and biographical. At a cultural level the painting deconstructs the hierarchies of privilege as a thing being high art and to levels of commonality. Meaning can be aesthetic rather than being philosophical.  At a literary level, the ideas of the thinker are deconstructed as myths surrounding the thinker. The thinker is demythologized. At a Philosophical level the aura of the thinker is challenged as to what it means to be a thinker? The myth of the thinker as someone stiff-necked and bound by an ideology is circumvented to the idea of art being only medium a of signification. A biographical content is myself as an author interacting with Philosophies and Art and fusing my knowledge into deconstructive reading of art.

Next person to put that fucking puritans post onto my dash you are getting sooooooo blocked