The Narrow Door - Joanne Harris
Not so different after all. Years and years after reading the first two, I’m reading the third in the St Oswald’s trilogy. This one seems to capture more of the magic that I usually feel is absent from her books set in England; they have a more practical tone. Maybe it’s that I know the characters well now.
It’s set in an Independent Boys School which recently invited in girls. Being the third book, there are lots of threads to follow. I went to exactly that type of school, as a girl, and it was fantastic, but the existence of girls in the school is far more marginal in the book than they were in my life. Women on school staff are more of a focus.
The main thread is the disappearance of the headteacher’s brother thirty-odd years before, at a rival school, and the story she tells around it.
Of the three, the misogyny theme really kicks up in this one. Straitley is not a misogynist himself, but he forgives it in others. Archaic practises are highlighted and views of women are shallow and unexamined. One of the two points of view (Straitley being one) is a successful woman - the headteacher - who has really had enough of having to justify herself. I do enjoy how he calls her Headmaster, which invokes a conversation we’ve had in my household - why can’t a woman be a Master? It’s a statement of qualification without an exact female equivalent, like wizard or warlock.
The Queer discourse continues.
Classics is not obsolete. Classics is vital and understanding Latin and Greek is one of the privileges of the privately educated, a central privilege. State schools should be teaching Classics to narrow the gap. Anyone who thinks Classics is useless either has no grasp on the languages or has never reflected on how useful it’s been to them.
The parts are named after the rivers to Hades. I love it.
I’ve read the first two before but not for a while, so I started at the beginning with Gentlemen and Players. My thoughts on those are beneath the cut.
An elegant whodunnit, based around worship of the privileged turning to deep-seated resentment of the privileged. Set in an independent day school (I always thought it was a boarding school and even in the middle of reading the books, I still feel like it’s a boarding school), the POV is split between the unidentified one what dun it and an acute-minded, likeable sixty-five year old Classics master called Roy Straitley.
It makes me glad that I did read this, just after Broken Light. The same ideas are growing in there, but growing in a world that isn’t fertile enough yet.
I always like teacher perspectives in books, even if they’re inaccurate, even if they’re, as in this book, wildly different from my inner-London primary expertise. I know from friends that teaching is teaching is teaching and the behaviour challenges you meet in LEA Early Years are awfully similar to those you meet in Public School Y11. I think I might like books that swap perspectives too, although I’m not 100% sure about that.
It’s set in 2004 and Working Together to Safeguard Children had turned up at that point but I was at school then and for some time after and I know that at least independent schools didn’t hurry to comply.
Drinking at lunchtime is pretty unusual for a teacher now, as far as I’m aware. A sackable offence in some schools, although I don’t think in mine. Teachers not much older than me are shocked at their previous Friday lunchtime behaviour. As soon as the kids are out of the door, what we do is our own business and bringing a bottle of wine to a long cutting and sticking session is a great thing to do, but I think drinking while they’re there has gone out.
One thing: no way in HELL any school in England would allow their alumni to be nicknamed “Ozzies”. We have too much respect for the spirit of the game.
Different Class
Back in St Oswalds, a pretty original plotline focussing on religious trauma, bereavement, mental illness, homophobia, the culture of disrespect towards experts that Michael Gove either initiated or identified before going on to treat experts with plenty of respect by all accounts. The manipulation of vulnerable children. Is a monster born or made?
Again I’m primarily interested in the school. I’m surprised there’s reference to ‘possible police checks’ for staff, as I would have thought the Soham murders SCR would have happened by then. 2005 was so long ago - apparently the New Head doesn’t have a Friends Reunited OR a MySpace account.
Straitley is an interesting character - I’m not easily seduced by tradition myself and I found his attachment to it a bit wearing at first. But then later on, he raises his standard for a friend of his with very progressive ideas and my perspective of him changed: not necessarily someone who is anti-progress but someone with a thirty-odd year career who can tell the difference between jobsworthy flimsiness and genuine positive change. You have to assume that his views are character views rather than author points, otherwise it becomes a distasteful read.
I do identify with him, as a teacher who loves teaching and hates admin. He is generally as joyful in his profession as I am (very) and his edges of bitterness also resemble mine. Those who don’t like teaching enough to stay in the classroom and instead ascend to SLT do tend to love a document. I detest children being given physical rewards for expected learning, as though they are doing it for us - in no small part because I have a sneaking suspicion that in schools where rewards play a big part, the children are indeed the product rather than the customer. I agree that forced conformity, aside from not benefitting anyone, is a distraction from effective learning and if your behaviour management depends on tucked-in shirts and being addressed as ‘sir’, you have no behaviour management at all.
Queerness is a focus, and the religious bullying thereof. It’s relevant to the recent backslide in some states in the US. I must have read this more recently than I thought, because not only is it highlighted, it’s highlighted in pink, so I must have been at least 25. Some of the queer-related things I highlighted are interesting to me now, in the sense that I’m surprised they were of interest to me then. Some of the things I hadn’t highlighted surprise me too, such as the egregious anti-tolerance arguments which seem mostly very tired now, easily debunked. My internal discourse must have been at a less sophisticated stage than I think of it as being.
Although the false reporting is portrayed as an act of aggression against Queerness, I don’t like how often false reporting of sexual assault comes up in fiction. I’m sure it happens in real life from time to time, but I’m absolutely confident that the percentage of reports that a false in fiction is astronomically higher than those in real life. I can think of several, whereas I can’t think of many times a person has been justifiably convicted of sexual assault having been accused from the beginning of the book.
Weird, that they act as though Independent Schools weren’t teaching Classics in 2005. There is a bit of pressure now, cost of living and everything, but in 2005, every Independent School did.
0 notes
i have come to terms with the fact that i will read the narrow road between desires by patrick rothfuss because who am i kidding but honestly, i feel so . . .dejected about it
like i have so many mixed feelings. i am okay waiting longer/never getting doors of stone but i will always have a part of me that is disappointed. not to mention, the broken promise from rothfuss of not releasing the first chapter from over a year ago is still quite upsetting to think of honestly. so to get another book, one that we already have a version of actually, with no word on dos, is a total letdown in my opinion.
another aspect is that i did not care for the lighting tree and it made me reevaluate how i see bast, whose head i did not like being in at all. there are sooo many characters i would rather see (denna, wil, sim, devi, fela, mola, tempi, elodin, vashet, kilvin etc) that getting a reworking of basts story will not excite me.
and ofc i am an advocate for not reading books one doesnt like but i know i will regret not getting thos book, not reading it (i may dnf if i really dont like it), and not engaging with the fandom about new material. so i am going to buy and read it because i wpuld regret not doing it more than actually doing it.
anyone else having mixed feelings or maybe just total delight or total disappointment?
51 notes
·
View notes