Hello, I am Hala, a mother of a child who has been living in Gaza under bombardment for more than three months. I was forced to leave my home and move to at least 7 areas in search of safety. We live a life devoid of the minimum necessities of life, with the struggle to obtain water, electricity, and food. My three-year-old daughter is unable to provide her with baby formula, Pampers, and even clothes. We have nothing. We left our home with nothing and cannot return to it. For a long period without work or any income, and with a lot of loss of life and money, my house was damaged, as was my husband’s wedding hall and his workplace. As A mother is unable to protect her daughter from hunger and death. I only want safety, and there is no safety in Gaza. We are forced to leave the country under these harsh conditions of displacement, killing and starvation. The image of my child crying for fear of death is still in my mind. I do not want to lose her soul in these massacres. But getting out of Gaza to save her, to keep her alive, requires a lot of money that we do not have. I started this campaign trying to get out of Gaza with my daughter and my husband across the Egyptian border, and if that fails, I will use this money to spend on my family and try to rebuild and compensate for the losses we suffered. We are extremely grateful for any assistance you can provide, and thank you from the bottom of our hearts for considering our appeal for support during this difficult time.

https://gofund.me/27fba9b6

All the reports coming from Rafah from the early hours of April 29 are literally identical: "Israel targeted the house of [family name]"

The same title, over and over again.

All within a couple of hours last night, three family homes in Rafah have been struck, killing at least 20, the majority of whom are women and children.

We now know about Project Lavender and we know about Israel's constant surveillance of Gaza so when I tell you that Israel had targeted civilian homes last night in Rafah, you know that there is absolutely no room for questioning Israel's intent here and always.

the way i have a ton of margot hcs and @hmsindefagtabl3 has percy hcs this is so serendipitous we are the perfect team

........ and if i said i need more scarlet pimpernel mutuals

aespa ‘Drama’ ♡ Ningning Concept Photos

until the end of time ☆

(prints)

1 Page of IRENE the PROLOGUE

the scarlet pimpernel social media things, part 3 (part 1/2)

my favorite musical margot being christine andreas and her having almost no good quality pics or videos was the worst thing to happen to me

Dear Mr. Bocock, … Your prominent dramatic critic, writing like a journalist, has written like a braying ass; what he meant is probably quite different and true enough–that the work is ugly and the allegory too like the usual pulpit judge and not just enough to the modesty of facts. You are right as to Mansfield: Hyde was the younger of the two. He was not good looking however; and not, great gods! a mere voluptuary. There is no harm in the voluptuary; and none, with my hand on my heart and in the sight of God, none–no harm whatever–in what prurient fools call ‘immorality.’ The harm was in Jekyll, because he was a hypocrite–not because he was fond of women; he says so himself; but people are so filled full of folly and inverted lust, that they can think of nothing but sexuality. The Hypocrite let out the beast Hyde–who is no more sexual than another, but who is the essence of cruelty and malice, and selfishness and cowardice: and these are the diabolic in man–not this poor wish to have a woman, that they make such a cry about. I know, and I dare to say, you know as well as I, that bad and good, even to our human eyes, has no more connection with what is called dissipation* than it has with flying kites. But the sexual field and the business field are perhaps the two best fitted for the display of cruelty and cowardice and selfishness. That is what people see; and then they confound… Yours truly, Robert Louis Stevenson

what pisses me off the most about the jekyll and hyde musical is that robert louis stevenson explicitly said to NOT make the inner conflict about sex but meanwhile frank wildhorn was like "lol bozo" and made it about jekyll/hyde choosing between a virgin and a whore like HUH.

what pisses me off the most about the jekyll and hyde musical is that robert louis stevenson explicitly said to NOT make the inner conflict about sex but meanwhile frank wildhorn was like "lol bozo" and made it about jekyll/hyde choosing between a virgin and a whore like HUH.

Linda Eder as Lucy Harris

Jekyll and Hyde Broadway 1997

the scarlet pimpernel social media posts, pt. 2 (pt. 1 here).

Orange Caramel - 까탈레나 (Catallena) (Catallena, 2014)

i have never hated anyone more than i have hated frank wildhorn