Tumgik
transpeculation · 7 months
Text
The fact that hell’s directory of angels tells any demon who has had any interactions with Aziraphale to immediately report to Crowley is such a funny detail. They really have been playing the long game.
Tumblr media
16K notes · View notes
transpeculation · 9 months
Note
actually I’m still thinking about this.
I do understand that by “reading comprehension” anon meant textual analysis, but, that isn’t what reading comprehension means. 
Reading comprehension refers to the literal meaning of text. That’s text as in writing, not ‘a text’ as in a piece of media.
But criticising “reading comprehension” is a popular tumblr joke used about people who wildly misinterpret text posts.
So, anon decided that was an appropriate thing to accuse me of based on a different interpretation of what happened (off screen!) in a tv show.
I said that I didn’t like the ending of a queer storyline and anon decides it’s appropriate to accuse me of thinking all queer stories have to be depressing to be valid.
Based on nothing.
You can just let people have different opinions about things.
You don’t have to accuse me of being a senseless queer traitor just bc I mentioned disliking the resolution to a fucking tv show.
i'm sorry you're this bad at reading comprehension. you can get better. i believe in you
i am sick to gd death of the "colin being able to do what he explicitly said he wanted to do is Actually Bad. i am very smart" narrative. like, i'm really sorry that you think queer stories have to be depressing to Be Valid or whatever, but the rest of us are tired of being everyone else's tragedy porn. he's not out now. he's not a Spokesperson For Queer Athletes. paying a slight bit of attention to the text would tell you that no one noticed, and as someone who's been on large sports fields for years, that's actually really fucking common in the aftermath of a huge game. like, just use an ounce of common fucking sense jfc
hahaha omg wtf
um no i don't think it's clear at all in the text that no-one noticed?
it's literally just not adressed at all
I'm sure you're right that in real life no-one would notice but it's a tv show and what people are gonna read into it is that he's come out.
2 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 9 months
Text
hey op - I feel like you aren’t really understanding that what you said is just factually wrong. 
People aren’t disagreeing because of discourse. 
It just literally isn’t true that John Smith could possibly have been motivated by that because he never once killed off a love interest of Constantine’s.
It has nothing to do with fridging because he never fridged anyone. 
He never thought “Christ I have to keep coming up with birds for this guy to shag and get killed, maybe if he’s into blokes too I can switch it up a bit.”
We know this because he wrote one issue in which John didn’t even have any new love interests.
He didn’t come up with any “birds for this guy to shag and get killed” ever that just didn’t happen. 
He couldn’t possibly have made Constantine bi to diversify his love interests because he never made him a male love interest.
Do you understand?
More discussions of "fridging" and female representation in comics need to bring up how the writers made John Constantine bisexual specifically so they could have more variety in lovers killed to advance his story
(80s Vertigo was horror, remember, and the basic narrative loop was John being smooth and witty with his plots right up to the point where the stuff he's set in motion starts horrifically killing loved ones and innocents)
91 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 9 months
Text
personally I don’t want to know Crowley’s deadname angel name
10 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 9 months
Note
i'm sorry you're this bad at reading comprehension. you can get better. i believe in you
i am sick to gd death of the "colin being able to do what he explicitly said he wanted to do is Actually Bad. i am very smart" narrative. like, i'm really sorry that you think queer stories have to be depressing to Be Valid or whatever, but the rest of us are tired of being everyone else's tragedy porn. he's not out now. he's not a Spokesperson For Queer Athletes. paying a slight bit of attention to the text would tell you that no one noticed, and as someone who's been on large sports fields for years, that's actually really fucking common in the aftermath of a huge game. like, just use an ounce of common fucking sense jfc
hahaha omg wtf
um no i don't think it's clear at all in the text that no-one noticed?
it's literally just not adressed at all
I'm sure you're right that in real life no-one would notice but it's a tv show and what people are gonna read into it is that he's come out.
2 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 9 months
Text
trans crowley manifesto
so re: transness in good omens. if we’re talking about explicit canon either all or none of the angels/demons are trans depending on how you’re defining it
they are all sexless and seem to choose their own gender presentation. probably you could categorize them all as agender
but I would argue that thematically Crowley is the most trans.
evidence: 
1. presents as, at different times, both a man and a woman, explicitly in the show.
male: Mr. Anthony J Crowley.
female: Nanny.
2. tends to dress more androgynously than most other angel/demon characters.
I’m not going to provide evidence for this; other people have done much more/better analysis of Crowley’s costuming than I am capable of.
3. Explicitly denies being a man to a human character. (!!)
“you’re a good lad.” / “I’m not actually. Either.”
That quote is pretty important and I don’t think it’s unintentional that it was Crowley and not Aziraphale that got this line. Though we understand that angels do not have gender, we do see them performing what looks like gender. Crowley and Aziraphale both create human male personas to blend in with the humans. I suspect default demon/angel attitude to gender identity would be to not care how they are viewed by others. This moment shows that Crowley cares enough about his gender to bother telling an acquaintance (someone he seems to like) that his gender identity is not male.
It is also the writers reinforcing the coding of Crowley as trans, which comes with his androgynous gender presentation.
4. is the only character in the show to have explicitly chosen his own name (!!).
we never learn his deadname angel name
we don’t know how he came by the name Crawley, but we do know that he chose Crowley (and Anthony J.!!) himself.
5. i think there’s some interesting parallels between falling from grace and transition.
When they fall, demons seem to change name, physical form (Crowley got his snake eyes), and social role.
it doesn’t work as an analogy, but it isn’t meant to (it would not be good if the angels were cis and the demons were trans lol - but that’s not what I’m saying).
5.5. when viewed as a type of transition I think there’s some really interesting stuff going on with the way Crowley and Aziraphale view his demon-ness differently. Analysing all their interactions through this lens needs it’s own post but in general:
i wouldn’t say Crowley thinks of his fall as a good thing (he says “I didn’t mean to fall” and seems a little bitter that he was cast out just for asking questions) but he also doesn’t seem to regret it. he doesn’t think there is anything wrong with being a demon. we know that he’s not an evil person, but he doesn’t seem conflicted about working for the “bad guys” the way Aziraphale is conflicted about being friends with someone on the other side. (He hates the demons, of course, but he also hates the angels.)
Aziraphale thinks all their problems would be solved if they were both angels. Crowley seems offended by the suggestion. There isn’t anything wrong with who he is.
9 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 9 months
Text
this blog is now about how trans Crowley good omens is
9 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 9 months
Text
made a couple of popular ted lasso posts but I stopped hyperfocusing on it around the time of the finale. Sorry to anyone who followed me for that lol
Anyway basically I think Colin kissing Michael on the pitch was an unbelievably bad decision which retroactively made Colin's whole storyline worse.
2 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 10 months
Text
@criticalspell​ commented “people may choose to have a masectomy for non-gender reasons (such as breast cancer), and its a pretty common thing for women in remakes of old cartoons, etc, to have their breast size reduced for censorship reasons. i dont think its explicitly a reference to only trans issues, and imo highlights both of their misogyny more than anything else”
Can’t reply bc this is a sideblog so I’m responding in a reblog.
So, I want to clarify that I’m very much aware that people might have a mastectomy for lots of reasons - hence why I said that cis people can get them. I understand that the phrasing I used “if they want to” is misleading (if you’re getting a mastectomy because you have to for medical reasons it’s not necessarily that you want to) but that was just me being flippant.
But either way, I disagree. Yes, censorship would be a cleaner comparison, because censorship is what is literally depicted.
But if they were trying to talk about that, why did they talk about “mutilation” and “women’s rights”?
How does it have anything to do with misogyny? Censorship of breasts in cartoons IS misogyny and the boys would be right to criticise it as religious conservatism. The iasip gang are not always depicted as being in the wrong, but I feel like it’s pretty clear in this episode that you are not meant to take their side.
I agree that the scene highlights their misogyny, because it shows them getting upset at not being able to perv on a teenage girl character because her breasts were removed. But that is characterisation, not a political stance.
I hope it isn’t the political stance of the episode because then the message would be: “it is a good thing to censor women’s bodies in children’s media so that children are not exposed to sex.” Which would be an incredibly conservative stance.
Of course you could be right about it being a mixture of things they are trying to say in this scene, in fact I’m sure that you are.
But you’re just going to have to trust me that the language they use “mutilated this poor woman,” “lopping off tits,” “everyone’s gone crazy; this is nuts!,” “women’s rights,” is an obvious reference to the current ongoing moral panic about trans people, trans kids, and trans healthcare.
The fact that it isn’t quite explicit is actually something that also bothered me. It felt like something you would only pick up on if you were “in the know.” That initially frustrated me, because I was concerned that without explicit references to trans surgeries, they might accidentally reinforce a disgust reaction to trans bodies.  
Now, thinking about it, I wonder if they felt unable to be explicit about it specifically because of the current ongoing moral panic about trans kids.
okay so I just watched the new ep of it’s always sunny.
It’s set in a knock-off/parody Chuck. E. Cheese place and the episode depicts the gang getting angry that things have changed since they were children. 
These tend to be safety precautions and changes to bigoted stereotypes/jokes/behaviour. 
For example, one of the characters was previously a disablist caricature, and Dee is upset that he no longer speaks with a stutter (Frank uses the r slur).
There’s an idea that older generations are always going to be upset about attempts to change things to be more progressive (with the gang obviously going overboard in their disgust/reaction). 
Frank keeps bringing up his experiences of the place in the 50′s, which horrify the others for its overt racism and misogyny. But then the rest of them criticise the place for no longer doing the bigoted things they loved as kids.
So, as always, the gang is in the wrong here. Still, there was a bit that bothered me.
One of the animatronics, a teenaged girl, had originally been designed with realistic breasts. These had been sanded down and replaced with bubble wrap. 
Dennis and Charlie react with disgust and Charlie says that “they mutilated this poor woman.” 
Initially Dennis suggests that this is the work of the “god damned libs,” but when Charlie suggests that it could be religious conservatives, Dennis agrees that “lopping tits off feels like a religious move.”
So. They’re talking about top surgery, right?
They must be. The language is too specific otherwise.
But this is not a trans character. Not a real person who can make this kind of decision. Not a personal choice by somebody exercising bodily autonomy.
This is an object which was censored, presumably to protect any kids who might accidentally (or even purposefully) see the animatronic topless.
This isn’t acceptance of trans people; it’s a safety precaution.
So, the analogy doesn’t work, right? They can’t be saying “trans people should be allowed to lop their tits off if they want to.” Because there aren’t any trans people! There aren’t even any cis people (who should, of course, also be allowed to lop their tits off if they want to).
The message can only be: “people who are disgusted by this are old-fashioned, ignorant, and misinformed.”
Old fashioned, because that is the theme of the episode. The characters are upset that times have changed. 
Ignorant and misinformed because of course, if you know anything about lopping off tits, you know that religious conservatives are (usually) very much opposed.
Dennis also says: “this is a sad day for women’s rights.” This could be a reference to terfs?
He, (who is currently perving on an animatronic teenaged girl) is positioning himself as an advocate for women’s rights by criticising “lopping off tits.” So, the joke is that he’s a hypocrite. He positions himself as a defender of women (and people he perceives as women) while actively harming them.
Idk. It’s not bad exactly, but it bothers me that it’s a reference to trans bodies without actually mentioning or depicting trans people.
I feel like it’s a problem that iasip has with all the issues it tackles. It lacks a certain clarity. It knows who it’s making fun of but it’s not entirely sure what the “right” position is. 
It’s always making fun of racists - but is it antiracist? It makes fun of transphobes - but does it support trans liberation?
12 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 10 months
Text
okay so I just watched the new ep of it’s always sunny.
It’s set in a knock-off/parody Chuck. E. Cheese place and the episode depicts the gang getting angry that things have changed since they were children. 
These tend to be safety precautions and changes to bigoted stereotypes/jokes/behaviour. 
For example, one of the characters was previously a disablist caricature, and Dee is upset that he no longer speaks with a stutter (Frank uses the r slur).
There’s an idea that older generations are always going to be upset about attempts to change things to be more progressive (with the gang obviously going overboard in their disgust/reaction). 
Frank keeps bringing up his experiences of the place in the 50′s, which horrify the others for its overt racism and misogyny. But then the rest of them criticise the place for no longer doing the bigoted things they loved as kids.
So, as always, the gang is in the wrong here. Still, there was a bit that bothered me.
One of the animatronics, a teenaged girl, had originally been designed with realistic breasts. These had been sanded down and replaced with bubble wrap. 
Dennis and Charlie react with disgust and Charlie says that “they mutilated this poor woman.” 
Initially Dennis suggests that this is the work of the “god damned libs,” but when Charlie suggests that it could be religious conservatives, Dennis agrees that “lopping tits off feels like a religious move.”
So. They’re talking about top surgery, right?
They must be. The language is too specific otherwise.
But this is not a trans character. Not a real person who can make this kind of decision. Not a personal choice by somebody exercising bodily autonomy.
This is an object which was censored, presumably to protect any kids who might accidentally (or even purposefully) see the animatronic topless.
This isn’t acceptance of trans people; it’s a safety precaution.
So, the analogy doesn’t work, right? They can’t be saying “trans people should be allowed to lop their tits off if they want to.” Because there aren’t any trans people! There aren’t even any cis people (who should, of course, also be allowed to lop their tits off if they want to).
The message can only be: “people who are disgusted by this are old-fashioned, ignorant, and misinformed.”
Old fashioned, because that is the theme of the episode. The characters are upset that times have changed. 
Ignorant and misinformed because of course, if you know anything about lopping off tits, you know that religious conservatives are (usually) very much opposed.
Dennis also says: “this is a sad day for women’s rights.” This could be a reference to terfs?
He, (who is currently perving on an animatronic teenaged girl) is positioning himself as an advocate for women’s rights by criticising “lopping off tits.” So, the joke is that he’s a hypocrite. He positions himself as a defender of women (and people he perceives as women) while actively harming them.
Idk. It’s not bad exactly, but it bothers me that it’s a reference to trans bodies without actually mentioning or depicting trans people.
I feel like it’s a problem that iasip has with all the issues it tackles. It lacks a certain clarity. It knows who it’s making fun of but it’s not entirely sure what the “right” position is. 
It’s always making fun of racists - but is it antiracist? It makes fun of transphobes - but does it support trans liberation?
12 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 11 months
Text
[“A basic premise of straight culture is the idea that gendered bodies, especially women’s bodies, require purification and modification to be desirable—shaving, perfuming, toning, refining, shrinking, enlarging, and antiaging. But in queer spaces, it is often precisely the hairy, sweaty, dirty, smelly, or unkempt gendered body that is most beloved. I recall the first time I entered a gay men’s sex shop, in the 1990s in the Castro district of San Francisco, and encountered a barrel full of lightly stained and dingy-looking “used jock straps” for sale. It was my introduction to the fact that there were people in the world who desired men’s bodies so much that they wanted deep, intimate, and seemingly unconditional contact with them—even and especially the parts of men’s bodies that straight women seemed to want to avoid.
Most straight women I knew, no doubt due to their socialization as girls and women, appreciated men’s bodies for their sexual functionality but not as a site of objectification that they were excited to dive into and explore—to smell, taste, or penetrate. Similarly, I have been to dozens of dyke strip shows, burlesque shows, drag-king shows, and sex shows in which women’s armpit hair and leg hair and facial hair or their body fat or their genderqueer bodies have been precisely the objects of the audience’s collective lust. Fat bodies and hairy bodies are also staples of queer dyke porn, not relegated to a fetish category. In other words, queer desire is marked by a lustful appreciation for even those parts of men’s and women’s bodies that have been degraded by straight culture. Like a food adventurer who delights in those parts of the animal or plant deemed undesirable by the narrowing of mainstream tastes, queer people’s desire for the full animal has been less constrained. Recognizing this suggests that gay men may have a deeper or more comprehensive appreciation for men’s bodies than do straight women, just as lesbians’ lust for women is arguably more expansive and forgiving than straight men’s. But most importantly, because queer circuits of desire do not rely on the erotic encounter of “opposites” embedded in a broader culture of gendered acrimony and alienation, queer lust need not reconcile a conflict between wanting to fuck and generally disliking one’s fuckable population.”]
Jane Ward, The Tragedy of Heterosexuality
28K notes · View notes
transpeculation · 1 year
Text
MEN!!! it's spring. crop your shirts
93K notes · View notes
transpeculation · 1 year
Text
i love that they didn't actually show colin saying he's gay, i love that they didn't give the other footballers a big reaction, i love ted's speech about the fact that they DO CARE because it's not enough to be fine with colin being gay, they need to SUPPORT him because he's faced a lot. it's one of the best written coming out scenes i've ever seen and i hope more shows handle it as authentically and respectfully as ted lasso.
31 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 1 year
Text
another thing about will’s threesome (he 100% took them up on that offer) is that the ease with which he’s able to tell his mum contrasts with Trent and Colin’s conversation.
Which is a good thing! it is a very real representation of queerness to have characters where the stakes of coming out are very different.
it is different being a young queer man being open with a tolerant/accepting family
and being a closeted young gay man in a professional field where queerness is heavily stigamitized
and being an older gay man with a kid coming out to his wife
they are all different situations!
and you might be in multiple situations at once.
We know that will is comfortable talking about it with his mum but we don’t know if he’s able to come out at work; I imagine it is scary being a queer man who works in a men’s changing room.
(i wonder if that will come up later actually?)
150 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
"The Sea Princes" enjoy some alone time in the waves!
Click here to find this painting as a print!
231 notes · View notes
transpeculation · 1 year
Text
If you like fat boys hit that mfing reblog
14K notes · View notes
transpeculation · 1 year
Text
so this post got a lot of notes!
Thanks so much to everyone who put their thoughts in the tags I’ve loved reading them :)
I recommend everyone have a look there’s some good stuff.
if anyone wants me to do another breakdown like this lmk what would be a good moment to analyse! I’m very open to requests
Okay so let’s talk about dramatic irony.
Colin’s big Flaw right now is his inability to be himself. This impacts his relationships with team members and also his football playing.
Ted’s speech from a few eps ago where he says “without shame” and the camera focuses on colin? that is where this flaw ties in with his growth as a football player.
We have seen colin make mildly homophobic remarks in the locker room “okay i’ll fuck zava”.
We have seen moments like this increasingly this season as the audience becomes aware of his sexual orientation.
This provides the audience with dramatic irony. The irony is that we know he is saying this to hide as a gay man but the characters in the scene do not.
We also know that what colin is doing is harmful to him. but he is unable to see that. all he is able to do is protect himself.
This episode is the first time (iirc) that we see him say something misogynistic instead of homophobic.
“i know what i’m doing this weekend”
to colin, this is not different. To most of the other players, this is not different.
To us, the audience, this is worse than what he was doing before. He is no longer weaponising homophobia (something he is a victim of) but misogyny (which he is not). you might argue that isnt worse but personally it rubbed me the wrong way and i think a lot of people would agree.
Importantly, some of the players on the team are also opposed to this misogyny.
At this point colin stops joking, and starts defending his real opinion (he shouldn’t have to delete his personal files just because they might be leaked).
This is an issue that some members of the team have beliefs about.
Jamie, Sam, and Isaac, stand up for women by making it clear that keeping nudes when there is a high risk of leaking is not okay.
But colin has skin in this game. Usually, he is never “real” in conversations like this. But this time things are different. He wants to keep the photos.
we see him defend this position by mentioning “memories.” this shows us that his desire is not lustful but sentimental in nature. i’ve seen others point out that this is a facet of his identity (that he is unable to outwardly express!). The photos mean something to him and he is angry at the idea that he is doing something wrong by keeping them.
I don’t think we have ever seen him defend an opinion genuinely before as the audience? In s1 he was pretty much trying to impress jamie. there was one comment about welsh pride but that came across as a joke. (Ted lasso writers make colin more welsh challenge)
And the first time he breaks his facade, the first time he shows his real face, he gets outed.
If he hadn’t cared about the photos he would have stopped arguing, stayed quiet and nodded along. made a joke maybe. something we’ve seen him do many times before. but he was honest about his opinions, so isaac was able to tell he hadn’t deleted anything when everyone else was.
SO: dramatic irony.
The audience knows that he wasn’t being serious with his first comment. “I know what I’m doing this weekend”
We know that that was a joke meant to act as a hyper-masc, homophobic, misogynistic shield in order to disguise his true self.
But the rest of the team do not know that. Issac does not know that. He has probably been making “jokes” like this, off camera, for years.
He leaps straight from a joke about masturbating to leaked nudes, to defending keeping photos that he knows there is a risk of leaking.
We, as the audience, know that he only wants to keep photos.
But Isaac thinks he might as well be defending the leak.
When Colin says “fuck off” to Isaac, he prompts him to take his phone. Isaac is acting the responsible team captain, here.
From what information he has, it just seems like colin is completely out of line. He’s defending misigyny, probably risking the safety and privacy of multiple women, being uncharacteristically rude and angry about it.
He probably has to deal with toxic behaviour from team members all the time. His own captaincy has been a source of growth for him, from the bully he used to be, to someone who tries to make sure everyone is behaving respectfully and as a team.
In any other situation I would want him to take the phone and delete the photos.
But he didn’t know that Colin also needed privacy. And colin was unable to express that to him as someone who is desperately hiding parts of himself.
So Isaac takes the phone. 
I think this all explains Isaac’s reaction. Confusion, nods, leaves.
He is confused because he is learning that this interaction is absolutely not what he thought it was. He nods because he accepts that, bc it’s a totally different situation than he thought, he doesn’t need to delete the photos. then he leaves, because what else is he supposed to do.
And colin is left knowing that his slip-up (the first time we see him express a sincere and deeply held emotion in front of the team) caused the very thing he was so afraid of happening.
EDIT: oh also the irony of how isaac invades colins privacy while trying to protect other people’s because he doesn’t think of colin as someone who needs privacy from him. I allude to that but i meant to make is clearer. EDIT 2: corrected spelling of isaac
816 notes · View notes