I’ve already captioned one of these with “bugs when you lift up a rock” but… look.
Thanks for the submission!!
[ID: a minecraft screenshot, presumably from hermitcraft 9. It’s looking directly down on Tango, who is in turn looking directly up at the viewer. He’s in his full dungeon master outfit, and he’s holding a totem. He’s standing on hay bales and the edge of the improved f3 screen is visible on the right edge. His nametag is visible at the bottom of the screen, as is the viewer’s hotbar. They’ve recently eaten an enchanted golden apple, have 2 empty bottles, about 2 stacks of rockets, and a stack of torches. Edit: it’s Zedaph’s pov. End ID]
76 notes
·
View notes
ok so I’ve only watched 2 povs so far, but honestly so far the gem and the Scott’s team(Scott impulse and gem) really seems like the one to be weary of this season. Despite this being gems first game it really feels like from all they’ve done this first epsiode she might go all the way the finale. They somehow have a good fortified base, have stopped grians cactus monolpoly, and have an enchanter.
This is in part due to them just spending the entire time grinding and Scott and impulse being try hard as in this series( /j /lh) and gem seeming to be doing the same. It’s just, I’m not a betting man but if I was, it would be on them lol
22 notes
·
View notes
You know, I'm glad that some of us take the step to embrace things that we like even if they're "cringe" or "objectively bad"
But perhaps we could take the next step forward and embrace the idea of reading into books/shows/movies/etc even if they don't seem deep. Perhaps we could understand that the two kinds of media aren't either "shallow and meaningless so you're weird and brainrotted to read into it" or "incredibly and profoundly deep in every way so if you don't analyze every single angle of the thing then you're brainrotted". Some media is deeper than others, but all I propose is that no matter how deep it seems it's acceptable to dig into the thing and take the media seriously instead of just assuming that because of ____ thing (such as target audience or how cringe it is) the media not deep and will never be deep and everything good about it happened on accident.
12 notes
·
View notes
so like i want to talk more abt what suicidal means but the problem is "suicidal ideation presents in two general forms, active and passive. the thing most people think of as suicidal is the active version, where the person *actively* desires to be dead and/or is making a plan to get there. the passive form however gets almost no attention in media so many people experiencing it are unaware they are even depressed, much less passively suicidal. some examples: not wanting to experience death but feeling like you wouldn't mind if you didn't wake up tomorrow or just stopped existing; feeling deeply exhausted with just the entire concept of being alive; even feeling like you want to run away, change your name, and start a whole new life; none of these look like suicidal ideation to most people because they don't involve actively doing anything to get from point a to point b, especially the more abstract ones like the start a new life thing - but remember that in order to truly start a whole new life, you have to destroy your current one. it's not suicidal as in wanting to actually DIE die, it's just. wanting something close enough to scratch the itch. but just because you haven't booked the ticket doesn't mean you don't still revisit the 'vacation activities at point b' tab occasionally to daydream, yknow?" is i think very informative and specific, but its also quite long and run on-y so people are v likely to tap out like a third of the way through it, whereas "suicidal doesnt necessarily mean wanting to die" is way shorter and therefore catchier, but is also the kind of nonspecific phrasing that gets you a thousand angry anons about how you said all suicidal people are just pretending they actually want to die or some dumb shit. so it's a fun line to toe
5 notes
·
View notes
angela bassett and peter krause
are not only #1 and #2 on the call sheet, THEY ARE EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS. athena and bobby not getting an episode centered around them on their own adventure until season SIX shows just how generous they are in making sure the show is an ensemble.
the show is titled 911, aka it is about FIRST RESPONDERS. like it or not, that includes law enforcement officers....which the NUMBER ONE CAST MEMBER ON THE CALL SHEET happens to be. i only see bitching and moaning about “copaganda” when it seems a main character is getting more screen time than people’s personal faves. angela bassett was and continues to be a huge draw to the show. she’s absolutely why i even watched the pilot when it aired.
characters/actors that are secondary and tertiary have had plenty of stories/episodes centered around them. they do not own the show. their fans are not who the show is going to be primarily concerned with. despite the social media popularity (which occurs mostly in the echochamber that is tumblr) of certain actors/character, i feel pretty confident in saying that majority of the audience is tuning in to see either angela bassett, peter krause, or jennifer love hewitt.
42 notes
·
View notes
looking at the results of the lore purism poll and i’ve come to the conclusion i think we could be better implying if not directly communicating how lore purist we are during meta and character analysis; in poll terms i don’t think anybody will ever fully agree analytically with someone more than two points away from them, bc it’s near impossible when you aren’t technically even looking at the same narrative and aren’t considering the same plot points as canon
4 notes
·
View notes