#california civil litigation lawyer
Link
#california criminal lawyer#california criminal defense law firm#california civil litigation lawyer#california civil litigation attorney#ca criminal defense lawyer#ca criminal attorney#assault and battery attorney#affordable criminal defense attorney
0 notes
Text
Ninth Circuit Reverses Class Certification Order Because Liability Issues, Not Merely Damages, Were Individualized
Ninth Circuit Reverses Class Certification Order Because Liability Issues, Not Merely Damages, Were Individualized
The Ninth Circuit recently addressed an issue that tends to arise frequently in class certification motion practice: how trial courts should apply the predominance requirement where appellate decisions have said that the need to calculate individualized damages generally is not sufficient on its own to defeat class certification, but some putative class members likely have no damages. On these…
View On WordPress
#9th Circuit#business#California#Civil Procedure#class certification#courtroom#law firms#lawyers#legal#Litigation#Ninth Circuit#trial practice
0 notes
Text
TALLAHASSEE, FL — Authorities in two states are threatening Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis with criminal charges after dozens of migrants were flown from Texas to California this week and to Massachusetts in September 2022.
In California, authorities were investigating whether DeSantis was behind a flight that picked up asylum-seekers on the Texas border and flew them — apparently without their knowledge — to California's capital of Sacramento.
The development coincided with confirmation from the Bexar County Sheriff's Office in Texas that criminal charges were recommended against DeSantis in connection to an incident where 49 asylum seekers were flown from Texas to Martha's Vineyard as part of DeSantis' migrant relocation program.
In California, about 20 people aged 21 to 30 were flown by private jet to Sacramento on Monday, state Attorney General Rob Bonta said. It was the second such flight in four days.
Sacramento Mayor Darrell Steinberg and faith-based groups who have been assisting the migrants scheduled a news conference for Tuesday morning.
Meanwhile, California Gov. Gavin Newsom lashed out at DeSantis on Twitter, calling him a "small, pathetic man" and suggesting his state could pursue kidnapping charges.
"@RonDeSantis, you small, pathetic man," Newsom tweeted. "This isn't Martha's Vineyard. Kidnapping charges?"
With the tweet, Newsom included a section of the California penal code on kidnapping charges that reads, "(d) Every person who, being out of this state, abducts or takes by force or fraud any person contrary to the law of the place where that act is committed and brings, sends, or conveys that person within the limits of this state, and is afterwards found within the limits thereof, is guilty of kidnapping."
DeSantis, who is seeking the Republican nomination to run for president, has been a fierce critic of federal immigration policy under President Joe Biden and has heavily publicized Florida's role in past instances in which migrants were transported to Democratic-led states.
DeSantis and other Florida officials have remained mum, as they initially were last year when they flew 49 Venezuelan migrants to the upscale Massachusetts island of Martha's Vineyard, luring them onto private jets from a shelter in San Antonio.
In a statement to the Miami Herald this week, the Bexar County Sheriff's Office in Texas confirmed that criminal charges were recommended in connection with the Martha's Vineyard case.
The case was then passed to the Bexar County District Attorney, the Herald reported.
"The case filed includes both felony and misdemeanor charges of Unlawful Restraint," according to the statement. "At this time, the case is being reviewed by the DA's office. Once an update is available, it will be provided to the public."
The case by Texas authorities isn't the first piece of litigation levied at DeSantis regarding the flights to Martha's Vineyard.
Lawyers for Civil Rights filed the suit on behalf of about 50 Venezuelans involved in the flights, and Alianza Americas, a network of migrant-led organizations supporting immigrants in the U.S. in September 2022.
The lawsuit names DeSantis and Secretary of Florida Department of Transportation Secretary Jared Perdue, and called the flights "inhumane and morally repugnant."
The suit says the Florida officials arranged a "fraudulent and discriminatory scheme to transport nearly 50 vulnerable immigrants, including women and children, from San Antonio, Texas to Martha's Vineyard without shelter or resources in place."
According to the lawsuit, DeSantis used about $615,000 in taxpayer dollars to charter the flights to Martha's Vineyard and told the migrants they would arrive in either Washington, D.C., or Boston. The suit also says the migrants were lured into planes with the promise of benefits, including $10 McDonald's gift cards.
#florida#migrants#migrant flights by desantis#desantis#illegal detention#2 States Threaten DeSantis With Criminal Charges Over Migrant Flights#california
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
If your son has apprehension, keep him facing away from me when we’re taking the photo,” Dana Friedman tells the mother placing her wriggly 2-year-old onto his lap. The crying begins on contact. “That’s okay!” Friedman booms, his Santa voice at its full tenor, as he returns the child to his mother. “Take a photo of just the two of you!” He pretends to walk away, but actually sneaks back around the bench to stand behind them. It works almost instantly — the child calms, Santa smiles. Moment captured, everyone is happy.
…
Friedman, a 63-year-old civil-litigation lawyer, is a stout guy with a bushy white beard that he starts growing out every summer because it takes him six months to reach Santa realism. He’s a lifelong New Yorker who was raised in Borough Park. He’s Jewish, so didn’t have much to do with Santa until his secretary suggested, in the months after 9/11, that dressing as Santa might be a way to give back to the families of first responders. A natural performer, Friedman found that he enjoyed the role, and even went to a Santa class to learn the basics. Now he juggles over 100 bookings per season alongside his actual job — I watch him as he fields multiple work calls over the course of the day (“Hey I’m doing Santa stuff, I’ll call you later”). Friedman is now part of what he calls a “whole brotherhood” of Santas-for-hire, including his friend Stanley Taub, another Jewish Santa out in California, who he says has “impeccable suits.” (He tells me that there are “more Jewish Santas than you would think.”)
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Browsing the Lawful Landscape: The Role of Lawyers in Today's Culture
""
In today's complicated and busy globe, lawyers play an essential duty in making sure that justice is offered and that the rights of people and companies are secured. From composing legal records to standing for clients in court, attorneys are knowledgeable experts that give vital guidance and assistance in various lawful matters. Whether it's discussing a settlement, offering lawful guidance, or advocating for a customer's rate of interests, legal representatives are necessary in aiding people browse the typically daunting lawful landscape.Moreover, attorneys additionally serve as advocates for social justice and modification, using their knowledge to address systemic concerns and promote justness and equality within the lawful system. With pro bono job, public passion litigation, and advocacy projects, lawyers add to shaping laws and policies that impact society as a whole. By promoting ethical criteria and promoting for the guideline of law, legal representatives not only safeguard the civil liberties of their customers yet also contribute to the general health of neighborhoods and culture at huge.
Read more here problems with transfer on death deeds california
0 notes
Text
TRUMP HUSH MONEY TRIAL
texas attorney general opinion or2018-19705
Jurors have variety of backgrounds, news habits
18 chosen say former president’s history will not influence decisions
A full jury of 12 jurors and six alternates has been seated in the historic hush money trial of former president Donald Trump after four days of jury selection in the Manhattan-based court case.
Trump faces 34 counts of falsifying business records, part of what prosecutors have described as a scheme during the 2016 presidential campaign to cover up an alleged affair with adult-film actress Stormy Daniels.
Trump has pleaded not guilty.
Here is what is known about the jurors, according to The Washington Post ’s reporting and pool reports:
Juror 1
This juror gets his news from The New York Times , the Daily Mail , as well as “some” Fox News and MSNBC.
“I’ve heard some of them,” the juror, who works in sales, said about Trump’s other cases.
Juror 2
This juror said he follows former Trump lawyer Michael Cohen on social media platform X. Cohen, Trump’s former lawyer and confidant, arranged the hush money payment to Daniels in 2016 and is expected to be a key witness in the case.
He said he also follows former Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway on X, as well as other figures on the right and left.
The juror, an investment banker, said he did so because of his work in finance.
“Anything that might move the markets, I might need to know about,” he said.
During questioning by Trump’s defense team, he said Trump had done some good for the country. “It’s ambivalent. It goes both ways,” he said.
Juror 3
This juror said he doesn’t need to be a mind reader to determine intent.
“I am actually not super familiar with the other charges. I don’t really follow the news that closely — a little embarrassing to say,” he said.
He works as a corporate lawyer.
He reads The New York Times and Wall Street Journal.
In middle school, he enjoyed watching The Apprentice .
Juror 4
Asked by the prosecution if he had any concerns about returning a guilty verdict, this juror said, “No.”
He is not on social media and gets his news from a range of news outlets, he said.
He is an engineer.
He served on a criminal jury in California a long time ago but said he couldn’t recall if there was a verdict.
Juror 5
This juror said that, as a “woman of color,” she has friends with strong opinions about Trump but that she tries to avoid politics and is not very interested in the news.
While most of the jurors in the box indicated they were aware Trump faced other criminal cases, this woman signaled she did not.
She said she likes Trump’s candid style.
“President Trump speaks his mind,” she said. “I’d rather have that than someone in office that we don’t know what he’s doing behind the scenes.”
This juror works in education.
She gets her information from Google and TikTok, and she listens to The Breakfast Club , a radio show in New York City.
Juror 6
During questioning, this juror said she could treat Trump like any other person on trial.
“I would say that I think that Trump and I probably have different beliefs,” she said, “but I don’t think that that invalidates anything about who he is as a person.”
This juror works as a software engineer, and she gets her news from The New York Times and TikTok.
Juror 7
This juror said he has “political views as to the Trump presidency” and thinks there were probably Trump administration policies he disagreed with.
“I don’t know the man, and I don’t have opinions about him personally,” he added.
The juror also said he does not have any opinions about Trump’s character.
“I certainly follow the news. I’m aware there are other lawsuits out there,” he said. “But I’m not sure that I know anyone’s character.”
This juror works as a civil litigator.
He gets his news from The New York Times , Wall Street Journal , New York Post and The Washington Post . He also listens to NPR’s Car Talk , WNYC public radio and the SmartLess podcast.
Juror 8
This juror paused before answering “yes” when asked if he had feelings about Trump that could prevent him from being impartial.
Justice Juan Merchan stopped him, asked him to be clear, then repeated the question. “No,” the juror responded.
He said he gets his news from The New York Times , Wall Street Journal , CNBC and the BBC.
He is retired from a wealth management firm. He said he once served on a jury but the case settled before trial began.
Juror 9
This juror said she had opinions about Trump but insisted she could be impartial.
“I fully believe that I can follow the judge’s instructions,” she said. She added that she appreciated an analogy offered by prosecutors during questioning because, she said, “I’m not very well-versed in the legal world.”
She said she gets morning newsletters from The New York Times and CNN and listens to podcasts about reality television. “I don’t watch any news or follow it too closely,” she said. She said she works as a speech therapist.
Juror 10
This juror said he prefers podcasts about behavioral psychology to following the news.
When it comes to his media consumption, he said, “If anything, it’s The New York Times .” He works in e-commerce.
Juror 11
During questions from the defense team, this juror was blunt about how she views Trump.
“I don’t have strong opinions, but I don’t like his persona, how he presents himself in public,” she said.
“I don’t like some of my co-workers, but I don’t try to sabotage their work,” she continued, drawing laughs in the courtroom.
Merchan asked her to repeat herself for the record, which she did.
“He seems very selfish and self-serving,” she continued. “I don’t really appreciate that from any public servant.” The way he portrays himself publicly, she said, “it’s not my cup of tea.”
Trump defense lawyer Susan Necheles said, “It sounds a bit like what you’re saying is you don’t like him.”
“Yes,” the juror responded.
The juror works in product development.
She follows fashion publications and watches late-night television but doesn’t follow the news closely, she said.
Juror 12
This juror said she reads The New York Times and USA Today, and watches CNN. She also listens to sports and faith-based podcasts. She works as a physical therapist.
Alternate 1
This juror, the first alternate to be seated, gets her news from the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times .
She works in finance.
Alternate 2
Necheles, Trump’s defense lawyer, asked this alternate juror about witnesses changing their stories. “I will base my verdict on the proofs presented,” the juror said. “I won’t take into consideration whatever happened in the past.”
She added that she “will be objective and neutral for this case or any case the justice system needs me to do.”
The juror is not currently employed. She said she doesn’t watch the news, only skims through headlines, and isn’t on social media.
Alternate 3
This alternate juror told the court he doesn’t have a strong opinion of Trump. “My opinion is Donald Trump is a man, just like I am,” he said.
He said he agreed with the legal burden of proof of establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
“If there is evidence found against a man,” he said, “there should be consequences.” He said he thought that Trump had been treated fairly in the case.
He said he reads The New York Times and The Washington Post , and works in IT.
Alternate 4
Like several others on the jury, this alternate juror said she doesn’t have strong opinions about Trump.
She told the court she was “not a big news person” but reads The New York Times , Reuters, the BBC and social media. She works in the financial sector.
Alternate 5
This alternate juror said she gets news from The New York Times and Google.
She works in fashion.
Alternate 6
This alternate juror said she follows local news and listens to true crime podcasts. She works in construction.
Juror details:
Media play into Trump’s hands
A number of media outlets covering Donald Trump’s Manhattan criminal trial are playing right into the former president’s manipulative little hands, effectively assisting him with juror intimidation.
In real-time, specific details about prospective jurors are being blasted out on social media and on news networks – neighborhood names, marital status, job titles, things they like to do in their free time.
The result, as of Thursday morning, is one seated juror saying she couldn’t proceed out of fear her identity had been compromised.
Journalists have no business reporting jurors’ personal details
On Tuesday, Fox News lunkhead Jesse Watters was spitting out details on jurors who had been seated.
Speaking of juror No. 2, he said she gets her news from CNN and the New York Times and added: 'This nurse scares me if I’m Trump. Goodbye.'
That same juror told the court Thursday morning: 'Aspects of my identity have already been out there in public.
Yesterday alone, I had friends and family push things to me.
I don’t think at this point that I can be fair and unbiased.'
She was excused.
The judge scolded the press in attendance, and he was right to do so, as it’s not just Fox News working overtime to identify members of what is supposed to be an anonymous jury.
What’s the news value in small details about prospective jurors?
Politico published specific information about a prospective juror, including her neighborhood, job, hobby and the role she plays in a community organization.
On its website, ABC News had a story titled: 'Who are the first 7 jurors of Trump’s historic criminal trial.'
NBC News had an online story under the headline: 'A lawyer, a teacher and a software engineer: Meet the first jury members of Trump’s hush money trial.'
The public doesn’t pick the jurors, so there’s no public need to know
This level of reporting on what we journalists like to call 'civilians' is outrageous given the circumstances surrounding this trial.
There’s no inherent news value in knowing the hobbies or marital status of someone who might serve on the jury.
Each juror is vetted and decided on by defense attorneys and prosecutors – the public has no voice here.
It’s up to Trump’s lawyers and the Manhattan district attorney’s prosecutors to make sure the best people are chosen to consider the case and render a verdict.
Sharing minute personal details of people who are being asked nothing more than to perform their civic duty is low-brow, at best.
And attempting to ferret out the true identity of these people in hopes of spotting something to write or talk about is both dangerous and counterproductive to the administration of justice.
Threats and Donald Trump go hand-in-hand
Anyone paying attention knows threats and intimidation go hand-in-hand with Trump and his MAGA movement, and few know that better than journalists, who were long ago labeled 'the enemy of the people' by Trump himself.
So I’ll ask my fellow journalists out there:
What the hell do you think is going to happen to these people if you make it easy for others to identify them?
They will be targeted.
They will be threatened.
And what’s the news value in any of that?
The news here is that a former president and the all-but-certain GOP presidential nominee is on trial and he and his followers are so prone to dirty tricks and violent rhetoric that the jury requires anonymity.
Media outlets can’t become Trump’s unwitting accomplices
This feels like a trial for a mob boss, not a politician.
And the last thing the trial needs is thirsty-for-clicks media outlets tripping over each other to see who can be first to report on a potential juror’s favorite diner.
The people called for jury duty in this case are under enormous pressure, given the nature of the defendant.
They should be treated with respect and given the anonymity they need to honestly and effectively do their jobs.
Trump and his assorted minions will do all they can to jam up the mechanics of these proceedings.
We know this.
So we certainly don’t need minor-scoop-hungry journalists abandoning basic news judgment and putting good people in danger while acting as the defendant’s unwitting accomplices.
Who’s Afraid of Judging Donald Trump?
Lots of People
On Monday afternoon, ninety-six New Yorkers were ushered through metal detectors and into a courtroom on the fifteenth floor of the criminal courthouse in lower Manhattan.
They had been selected as prospective jurors in the People of the State of New York v. Donald J. Trump—the first-ever criminal trial of an American President.
As court officers led them into the gallery, several craned their necks to get a look at the defendant.
There he was: his face exactly as orange and mottled as it looks on TV, a long red tie draped over his paunch.
He stared right back at them, and leaned over to whisper something in the ear of one of his attorneys.
One prospective juror broke out in giggles, and put a hand over her mouth.
A clerk had everyone stand and swear to tell the truth during the jury-selection process.
“A fair juror is a person who will keep the promise to be fair and impartial,” Judge Juan Merchan said. “Please raise your hand if you believe you cannot be fair and impartial.”
More than half the hands in the room went up.
Merchan excused these unfair and partial people one by one.
“I just couldn’t do it,” one dismissed potential juror was heard saying out in the hall.
Who could?
It takes a special kind of person to be completely impartial when it comes to Donald Trump.
The judge and the lawyers on both sides of the case needed to find twelve such people for the jury, and also half a dozen more who could serve as alternates.
The thirty or so candidates who’d remained in the courtroom were asked to read through a long questionnaire—forty-two questions, along with numerous sub-questions.
The first prospective juror was a young woman who said she lived in midtown and worked in business development.
She felt that she could be fair and impartial, but she also had vacation plans that coincided with the trial.
She was excused.
The second prospective juror was a middle-aged white man with thick-framed glasses, who said he was a creative director at a clothing company.
“I’m here to judge the facts that are presented and not the individual,” he told the court.
He said he had never read any of Trump’s books and did not consider himself a supporter of the QAnon movement, the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, the Three Percenters, the Boogaloo Boys, or Antifa.
In his spare time, he said, he enjoyed hiking and cooking, and playing with his dog.
Was there any reason at all that he could not be a fair and impartial juror?
No, he said.
And yet the dog-loving creative director was too good to be true.
Trump’s team discovered a spicy Facebook post that he made in 2017.
“Good news!! Trump lost his court battle on his unlawful travel ban!!!” he wrote. “Get him out and lock him up.”
Under questioning from Trump’s lawyer Todd Blanche, the man acknowledged that the Facebook account was indeed
his. “I had strong feelings at the time,” he told the judge. “Today, like I said, I could be unbiased and open about what we are talking about today. But, you know, that was a place and time.”
Merchan wasn’t having it; he granted the defense’s request to have the potential juror axed.
“If I cannot credit a juror’s responses, then we cannot have him on the jury,” Merchan said. “This is a person who has expressed, at least at one time—it was several years ago—the desire that Donald Trump be locked up,” Merchan said. “Everyone knows that, if Mr. Trump is found guilty in this case, he faces a potential jail sentence, which would be lockup.”
By Thursday morning, only seven jurors had made it through the questionnaire, in addition to several rounds of follow-up questions from the prosecutors and Trump’s attorneys, and had been sworn in as members of the official jury.
They tended to be the people who had given the most inscrutable answers.
The foreman is an immigrant, a native of Ireland who now lives in upper Manhattan, and who said he gets his news from the Times, Fox News, and MSNBC.
Another juror, a young Black woman, seemed well aware of Trump’s baggage.
“Obviously, I’m a person of color, so I’m around people who did have an opinion during the election,” she said.
Yet she expressed a certain admiration for the defendant.
“President Trump speaks his mind,” she said. “I would rather that in a person than someone who’s in office and you don’t know what they’re doing behind the scenes.”
What was Trump doing during all this?
Brooding, mostly.
At several points, reporters noticed that he seemed to have dozed off, his eyes closed and his eyebrows slack, his chin occasionally drifting down toward his chest.
At other times, he spoke animatedly with Blanche, slapping his lawyer’s arm with the back of his hand.
Coming in and out of the courtroom during recesses, he sometimes stopped to talk with the reporters waiting in the courtroom hallway.
“Every legal pundit, every legal scholar, said this trial is a disgrace,” he said, on Tuesday morning, lying. “This is a trial that should never happen. It should have been thrown out a long time ago.”
At the defense table, he often slumped, perking up only when a potential juror said something he particularly approved or disapproved of.
He smiled and nodded, enthused, when the director of sales and revenue at a software company claimed to have read several of his old books, including “The Art of the Deal” and “How to Get Rich.”
When Blanche questioned a prospective juror who had filmed videos of Upper West Siders celebrating the 2020 election results, Trump muttered something under his breath and gestured aggressively.
“I won’t tolerate that,” Merchan snapped. “I will not have any jurors intimidated in this courtroom.”
And yet many of the would-be jurors have been intimidated, if not by Trump, then by the prospect of serving on a jury in such a high-profile case.
The stakes felt higher than ever on Friday afternoon, when, just before the court broke for lunch, a man doused himself in accelerant and set himself on fire, in a small park across from the courthouse.
(The man, who is reportedly in critical condition, threw pamphlets into the air before lighting the fire; the N.Y.P.D. has described the flyers as conspiracy-oriented.)
Even before this, the judge announced that one of the seven people who’d made it onto the official jury had called in to say that she was having second thoughts.
She’d heard from friends, family, and colleagues who told her that she was being talked about, online and on TV.
On Tuesday night, Fox News’s Jesse Watters did a segment on his prime-time show where he went through the chosen jurors one by one, and put graphics listing their occupations, racial backgrounds, and reading habits.
Everything but their names.
“The fate of a billionaire real-estate tycoon, TV celebrity turned forty-fifth President of the United States, is in the hands of New York City lawyers, teachers, and Disney workers who like to dance and get their news from the Times,” Watters said, smirking.
Merchan understood the juror’s concerns and allowed her to withdraw from the jury.
Anonymous juries are anonymous for good reason, he said: “It kind of defeats the purpose of that when so much information is put out there that it is very, very easy for anyone to identify who the jurors are.”
He admonished the reporters in the courthouse and said he was “directing” them to refrain from identifying potential jurors’ employers, or describing “anything that you observe with your eyes and hear with your ears related to the jurors,” such as their accents.
First Amendment lawyers told the New York Law Journal that Merchan’s prohibitions were “dubious” at best.
A judge can’t really keep journalists from reporting on what is said in an open court.
But, online, many journalists seemed to side with Merchan, and spoke up out of concern for the safety of the jury pool.
“What of editorial standards? we don’t report everything all the time,” one former BuzzFeed reporter wrote on X (formerly known as Twitter).
Having reporters choose what to censor in real time seems like a bad approach to a case that tests the very limits of judicial power and America’s constitutional order.
Merchan’s suggestion was that the reporters in the courtroom simply use “common sense.”
In the lead-up to the trial, many law professors and former prosecutors were of the opinion that an acquittal was a long shot for Trump.
“The allegations are, in substance, that Donald Trump falsified business records to conceal an agreement with others to unlawfully influence the 2016 Presidential election,” Merchan told the prospective jurors, on Monday. “Specifically, it is alleged that Donald Trump made or caused false business records to hide the true nature of payments made to Michael Cohen by characterizing them as payment for legal services rendered pursuant to a retainer agreement.”
The payment at the center of the case went to Stormy Daniels, an adult-film star who was prepared to go public with her past affair with Trump.
Trump has pleaded not guilty, but many legal observers believe a hung jury is the best outcome he can hope for.
He needs just one obstinate fan to make it into the final jury box.
On Tuesday afternoon, it seemed like he had almost found his guy, a young, fit man who looked to be in his thirties, with slicked-back hair.
But, before he even got to the questionnaire, the man requested to be excused.
“Your Honor, as much as I would love to serve for New York and one of our great Presidents, I could not give up my job for six-plus weeks, which means I would be working eighty-plus hours a week,” he said.
The judge excused him.
youtube
President Trump’s fate is in the hands of 12 regular people. Who are they, and how will each of them impact the case? Dr. Phil uses 15 years of trial science expertise to break down how this trial won’t be tried in the courtroom, but in the jury room.
0 notes
Text
Christopher Allen Darden (born April 7, 1956) is a lawyer, author, actor, and lecturer. He worked for 15 years in the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s office, where he gained national attention as a co-prosecutor in the O. J. Simpson murder case.
He was born in Richmond, California, the fourth of eight siblings. After graduating from John F. Kennedy High School, he enrolled at San Jose State University, where he participated in track and field and joined Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity. He received his BS in Criminal Justice Administration. He received his JD from the University of California, Hastings.
He passed the California Bar Exam in the summer of 1980. He was hired by the National Labor Relations Board in Los Angeles. He was hired for a position with the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office. He served in the central trials and hard-core gang units before transferring to the Special Investigation Division.
He was fired after the Simpson case and joined the faculty at California State University, Los Angeles, where he taught undergraduate criminal law. He was appointed associate professor of law at Southwestern University School of Law. He taught and specialized in criminal procedure and trial advocacy.
He is a former legal commentator for CNBC, CNN, Court TV, and NBC, and a frequent guest and commentator on CNN, Court TV, and Fox News Network. He has made guest appearances on Touched by an Angel, Girlfriends, The Tonight Show with Jay Leno, The Howard Stern Show, Muppets Tonight, Roseanne, the movie Liar Liar, and One Hot Summer Night. He is the former principal attorney in Power of Attorney.
He is a writer. In addition to In Contempt, he co-authored several crime novels, including The Trials of Nikki Hill, LA Justice, and The Last Defense. He appeared on the cover of Newsweek in 1996 with an article “My Case Against O.J.”.
He started his firm, Darden & Associates, Inc., specializing in criminal defense and civil litigation.
He married TV executive Marcia Carter (1997) and together they have five children. #africanhistory365 #africanexcellence #alphaphialpha
0 notes
Text
The Importance of Hiring A Skilled Criminal Defense Lawyer In California
The Law Office of Jerry L. Steering is a law firm based in Newport Beach, California, USA, that specializes in civil rights litigation, including cases of police brutality and excessive force.
1 note
·
View note
Text
The Function of Attorneys in Ensuring Justice: A Comprehensive Summary
""
Lawyers play an important function in our society, standing for and supporting for individuals, organizations, and companies in lawful issues. From giving lawful guidance to standing for customers in court, attorneys are the foundation of the justice system. Whether it's criminal protection, individual injury cases, or business law, their knowledge and expertise are crucial in guaranteeing justice is served. In this blog post, we will certainly dig right into the multifaceted role of legal representatives and check out the numerous areas of legislation they specialize in.Paragraph 2: One of
the key duties of lawyers is to provide legal advice to their customers. They extensively assess their customers'instances, study appropriate laws, and offer skilled suggestions on the ideal strategy. Additionally, attorneys compose lawful files, such as agreements, wills, and pleadings, ensuring that they are lawfully sound and safeguard their customers' interests. In court, attorneys represent their customers by offering their arguments, cross-examining witnesses, and advocating for their civil liberties. They are proficient negotiators, aiming to clear up conflicts agreeably whenever feasible, but additionally tough litigators, prepared to combat for their clients' legal rights and look for justice in the court room. Attorneys are not only supports for their customers but also function as intermediaries in between them and the lawful system, guaranteeing that their legal rights are protected which justice is offered.
Read more here california business law
1 note
·
View note
Link
Andrew Dósa-civil attorney in Alameda County CA explains the first steps an injured party must take to help their future claim or lawsuit! For more information contact us at 510-333-4564.
#Personal Injury Attorney in Alameda#Alameda personal injury law firm#Alameda personal injury lawyers#Alameda Personal Injury Attorney#California Personal Injury Attorney#california criminal lawyer#california criminal defense law firm#california civil litigation lawyer#california civil litigation attorney#ca criminal defense lawyer
0 notes
Text
The Modern Duty of Lawyers: Advocacy, Expertise, and Honest Duty
""
Lawyers play a vital function in society, working as supporters, experts, and professionals in the complex world of legislation. As attorneys, they are left with upholding justice, safeguarding the civil liberties of their customers, and guaranteeing justness in the lawful system. In today's busy and ever-evolving globe, the role of attorneys has expanded past the courtroom, with their know-how looked for in various domain names, including business, health care, technology, and more.Lawyers are not only legal reps, yet additionally problem-solvers. They possess the expertise and skills to navigate via elaborate legal treatments, analyze complex regulations, and give tactical suggestions. Whether it's drafting contracts, discussing settlements, or standing for customers in court, attorneys are crucial in protecting private rights and promoting justice. Their capacity to examine and interpret the regulation enables them to provide very useful support, guaranteeing individuals and companies make informed decisions within the legal framework. In addition, lawyers offer as conciliators, intending to settle disagreements agreeably and prevent lengthy and pricey litigation procedures whenever possible.Paragraph 2: In addition to their technological competence, lawyers are also bound by a strong sense of honest obligation. Promoting professional values and keeping customer discretion are crucial aspects of their job. Legal representatives have to stick to a standard procedure that promotes stability, justness, and respect for the legal system. This dedication to ethical technique is important in keeping public count on and self-confidence in the lawful profession.In current years, legal representatives have additionally embraced technology to enhance their services. From online examinations to online study devices, technology has reinvented the method lawful professionals run. Nonetheless, while innovation brings efficiency and convenience, attorneys need to likewise browse the moral ramifications related to it, such as information personal privacy and cybersecurity concerns.In verdict, lawyers are important contributors to society, playing a diverse role that exceeds court depiction. Their campaigning for, expertise, and ethical responsibility guarantee
that justice is served, specific civil liberties are safeguarded, and the lawful system operates efficiently. As the globe proceeds to progress, legal representatives will certainly play a progressively vital duty fit lawful frameworks and maintaining the regulation of law.
Read more here personal injury attorneys southern california
0 notes
Text
Best Restaurant Eviction Lawyer In NYC
In today’s world one, real estate has become one of the top investments for many individuals across New York City. The fact is that New York is home to some of the most expensive land and property in the country, and for many individuals who have left their home state of New York for places like Florida, Texas, and California, holding onto their properties back home in NYC has turned into a profitable venture into real estate investing!
0 notes
Text
Expert Guidance: Class Action Lawsuits in Los Angeles
In case your consumer or workplace rights have been violated, it is possible to get assured help now at Law Advocate Group. Class Action Lawsuit Lawyer Los Angeles at Law Advocate Group is trusted for aggressively resolving these complex legal issues for consumers throughout Los Angeles. The class action attorneys at the Law Advocate Group firm aim to put power back in the hands of everyday people. If your consumer or workplace rights have been violated, contact Law Advocate Group today.
A class action lawsuit lawyer in Los Angeles is one of the most efficient ways to hold negligent parties accountable. Class actions are intended to assist people in uniting and securing outcomes when it would have been difficult for them to do so individually. Law Advocate Group is a leading firm to help a number of people brings legal action against one or more parties who are being accused of the same offense. Through class action lawsuits, you can enable the number of people affected to combine their allegations into one case, improving the case’s value and leading to successful outcomes.
Law Advocate Group, LLP, has class action lawsuits well-versed in covering a wide range of practice areas, including product liability, false advertising, torts, pharmaceuticals, and wage-and-hour employment claims.
Class action lawsuit lawyer Los Angles from Law Advocate Group is aware of the complexity of such cases. Therefore, they team up with other big firms to increase efforts to protect their clients and the public at large. These firms and their attorneys have been approved as class counsel in many ground-breaking cases and have certified and resolved many cases in California and across the United States.
If you are contemplating filing a class action claim, please contact Law Advocate Group to schedule an initial consultation. They can provide a very thorough consultation, give you honest legal advice, and provide you with the most professional representation our Beverly Hills Law Firm has to offer.
Class action lawsuit lawyer Los Angeles is knowledgeable in many areas of class action lawsuits. Based in Beverly Hills, they have over 80 years of legal representation experience.
Law Advocate Group, LLP, is a Beverly Hills class action law firm in Los Angeles. Law Advocate Group, LLP, provides general legal services, counsel, and representation to individuals and businesses in Beverly Hills, Los Angeles, and throughout Southern California. Law Advocate Group’s experienced legal team puts more than 80 years of combined experience and knowledge at your side in business law, entertainment law, real estate law, civil and business litigation, and criminal defense law.
0 notes
Text
Birth Injury Cases: Fighting for Fairness from the Perspective of a Malpractice Lawyer
In cases involving birth injuries, Malpractice Attorneys are extremely important in ensuring their clients' rights are protected. The greatest birth injury attorneys in California are represented by these legal stalwarts who fight for justice. They are well-versed in the laws surrounding birth injuries and fight for victims' rights to compensation.
When it comes to situations involving birth injuries, malpractice lawyers are the first to fight for victims' rights. They are the backbone of the greatest birth injury law firms in California, fighting tirelessly for their clients' interests. The legal complexities of birth injuries can affect a person for the rest of their lives, therefore it's important to work with an experienced attorney.
These lawyers work closely with the top birth injury lawyers in California to develop strong cases, and they never miss a detail in their analysis. Their commitment extends far beyond the requirements of the law, as they show compassion for the victims' loved ones and work tirelessly to secure financial restitution on their behalf.
Malpractice lawyers typically have an in-depth understanding of the medical and legal complexities involved in birth harm litigation. These attorneys' unyielding dedication serves not only their clients' best interests, but also the wider cause of ensuring justice in cases involving birth injuries.
#brain injury attorneys#malpractice lawyer#best medical malpractice firm#birth injury lawsuit#brain trauma injury lawsuit
0 notes
Text
When will workers’ comp offer a settlement in California in 2023
Workers’ compensation lawsuits are influenced by state law, which differs by state. Many states have appeals courts whose main responsibility is to hear workers’ compensation disputes. Under California law, claims administrators must investigate claims within 90 days of the accident; if the accident caused temporary disability, disability payments must be made within 14 days. In some cases, the timing of settlement offers can vary depending on the circumstances of each case. Insurers may contact an injured worker with a settlement offer immediately after the injury happens in some cases, especially if the case appears uncomplicated. However, it is critical not to accept the workers comp first settlement offer because it may not adequately account for the long-term repercussions of the injury. This blog finely covers the needed things you must know about if you are concerned about will workers’ comp offer me a settlement?
How Does Workers’ Comp Protect Employees and Employers?
Coping with workers’ comp claims is complex. Numerous elements move, so it might require some effort—and a healthy dose of patience—to follow a claim out to its best settlement, whether you’re an employee or an employer. The most crucial point is that claims pay for the requirements of the wounded worker, even if settlement takes several weeks to several years. It’s needed to never forget that compensation for workers serves to protect them and their employers against the hazards of a lawsuit in California.
Workers’ Comp Settlement Chart in California: What it says
The value of a workers’ comp settlement in California depends on various factors, including the extent of the injury, the impact on the employee’s ability to work, and the duration of the disability. If you suffered an injury in 2022 and earned more than $346.43 a week prior to the incident, you will be compensated for two-third amount as of the settlement claim amount of what you earned during employment.
Here’s the workers’ comp settlement Chart California for the last three years of temporary disability benefits.
Furthermore, in California, workers obtaining compensation benefits for workplace injury are usually disqualified for benefits related to unemployment. This is why unemployment benefits are meant to make up for lost pay caused by no fault of the employee, however, workers comp lawsuit payments for workers are designed to restore lost wages in response to a workplace injury.
The Role of California workers comp litigation Attorneys in your case
Workers comp lawsuits are different from typical civil lawsuits, and an injured worker does not file a traditional lawsuit against their employer. However, legal representation can still be essential in navigating the complex workers’ compensation system. A well-trained and clever workers’ comp attorney belong from a reputed law firm can defend your case in from of the jury members and get the rights secured for you by the California government. They will also compile evidence to support your claim and bargain with the firms for workers Compensation insurance California for a quick settlement.
Conclusion
In California, workers’ compensation provides a crucial safety net for those who sustain accidents or injuries at work. For injured workers to guarantee they obtain just and sufficient compensation for their losses, they must understand the workers’ compensation settlement procedure. Since settlements are a speedy process of ending an argument, it’s vital to use care and speak with a lawyer to get the best outcome for your specific situation. If you find yourself in this situation, consider hiring a long beach workers compensation attorney from our firm to help you through the legal system and defend your rights. Contact us at (562) 561-2669 or visit Workers’ Compensation Attorney Long Beach at Gaylord Nantais for a free case evaluation.
0 notes
Text
Key Components Of California Premises Liability Cases In 2023
If you are injured on someone else’s property because of unsafe conditions, the notion of premises responsibility may apply because the crucial aspect of premises liability cases is the property condition assessment. This particular kind of personal injury claim is based on proving carelessness which is a legal fault that emerges from an offense of a duty of protection. If a property owner fails to safeguard tenants from injurious events, they may be sued and liable for penalties. Premises liability claims can involve a variety of events, some of which can result in compensation.
The legal obligation of property owners in California to maintain a secure environment for guests and occupants is at the center of premises liability lawsuits. As per the California Civil Code Section 1714, the property owner’s will be merely responsible for the is somebody comes in contact with injuries on their property. Whenever such an incident happens in California both parties involved may benefit from knowing the key elements of such scenarios.
Premises liability scenarios when California premises liability Law can be implemented
Statutes, rules, and court rulings combine to form the premises liability law of California. Property owners are required by law to take reasonable precautions to guarantee the safety of guests and occupants. Premises liability litigation covers a wide variety of personal injury cases, like
Slips and falls
Impact injuries
Personal assaults
Water accidents
Fires and smoke
Toxic exposure
Premises Liability Claims
In premises liability cases, injured parties must demonstrate that the property owner was negligent in maintaining the premises, which led to their injuries. The injured party’s lawyer must prove that the property owner breached their duty of care and that this breach directly caused the injuries sustained.
Premises Liability Verdicts and Settlements
Examining previous premises liability verdicts and settlements in California can provide insights into potential outcomes for similar cases. However, each case is unique, and outcomes can vary based on the specific circumstances.
Premises Insurance and Premises Liability Settlements
Many premises liability cases are settled out of court through negotiations between the injured party’s lawyer and the property owner’s insurance company. Settlement amounts vary depending on factors such as the severity of injuries, medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. Property owners typically carry premises liability insurance to protect themselves from potential liability claims.
Premises Liability Attorney
Seeking legal representation from a premises liability attorney is essential for both plaintiffs and defendants. A knowledgeable premises liability lawyers can guide property owners in mitigating risks and help injured parties pursue fair compensation for their injuries.
How we help you win premises liability cases underneath California law
Our experienced team of premises liability attorneys is dedicated to helping you win your case. We have a proven track record of success in handling a wide range of premises liability claims, including slip and falls, inadequate security, and property negligence. Our comprehensive understanding of California premises liability law, combined with meticulous investigation and evidence gathering, allows us to build strong cases on your behalf. Our personal injury lawyer works devotedly to uphold your liberties and to get you the premises liability settlements you ought to have for your injuries.
Conclusion
understanding the key components of California premises liability cases in 2023 is crucial for all parties involved in such litigation. Property owners must maintain safe premises to prevent injuries and potential liability, while injured parties can seek justice and fair compensation through skilled legal representation. If you’ve been injured on someone else’s property due to premises liability negligence, don’t hesitate to take action. Contact our skilled premise liability attorneys today and let us fight for your rights and navigate the complexities of California premises liability law on your behalf additionally to get the justice and compensation you deserve. Contact Orange County Personal Injury Lawyer at (714)-586-8298 at Garcia & Phan for a free case evaluation.
0 notes
Last Seen Blogs
true-inlove
The Magic in love
untilthevoidscreamsback-blog
Rambling
kmlogistics12
KM Logistics Delivers LLC
imnothere0
imnOthere