MY RAFFLE !! ♡

Okey so for me it's something to have 300+ Followers although i don't even post Often or almost everything are oc's of mine, So im actually even Surprised that I reached 100, but yeah why not? It'll be a new year soon why not start like this?. Im not the best but thanks. :')

Thanks for staying here with me 🚴✨

We have 3 rules (◍•ᴗ•◍)

You have to be following me

Re-blog this post :D

Put your name in the comments !

Winners will be tagged in the future, there will be 3 winners (or 5 depending on if I feel encouraged to do others) Here or some examples of how the drawings are gonna be...

For the first winner it'll be a ship art or just two Charecter's together!

2nd winner, a +half body Charecter :')

And for the 3rd, a Bust drawing !

I'll see if i can add a background since im still not confident with that :') Feel free to join ✨

"Melusines' Survey" Web Event Now Available, Participate For Primogem Rewards!

The two Fontainian aquabus tour guides Aeval and Elphane have been tasked with carrying out a survey of Travelers visiting Fontaine.

Help Aeval and Elphane with their research~

Obtain Primogems and other in-game rewards, as well as a little surprise!

>> Click to Take Part in Event <<

Event Rules

● Event Duration: 2023/12/25 12:00 – 2024/01/07 23:29 (UTC+8)

● Raffle Prize Results Announcement: Before January 12, 2024

● Primogem Rewards Claim Time: Within 30 days of receiving the mail

Event Rewards

● Complete the survey to obtain Primogems ×40, Hero's Wit, and other in-game rewards.

● Share your survey results with the hashtag #GenshinMelusinesSurvey on Twitter (X), Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, VK, or other social media platforms.

Primogems ×160 (100 Winners)

Genshin Impact Ganyu Figure (10 Winners)

※ Sharing on HoYoLAB does not count towards prize draw participation.

User Terms and Conditions

・Please log in to the event using your HoYoverse Account and select your corresponding character in Genshin Impact to take part. This will ensure that your rewards can be sent and claimed correctly. You can participate in this event as long as your Adventure Rank is at least 10.

・After helping Aeval and Elphane complete their survey, the in-game rewards will be distributed via in-game mail. The mail will expire after 30 days, so don't forget to claim the rewards in time.

・Players who share their survey results with the specified hashtag #GenshinMelusinesSurvey on Twitter (X), Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, VK, or other social media platforms will be entered into the raffle and have a chance to win Primogems ×160 or a Genshin Impact figure.

・If you post and win on multiple platforms, you'll only be able to win one reward. Reward information will be sent out via private messages.

・The list of winners will be posted on the various official social media platforms for different languages. Relevant information will also be sent to the winners via private messages.

・Primogem rewards obtained from the raffle will be issued via in-game mail within 20 business days of the winners list being announced. The mail is valid for 30 days. You will be deemed to have forfeited your rewards if you fail to claim them before the mail expires, so don't forget to claim them in time.

・Winners will be informed of the specific issuance time for Genshin Impact figures won in the raffle via private messages.

・This event will be held and judged on multiple platforms. The event rewards will be shared across all platforms, and will not be distributed proportionately between different platforms/regions.

・If the issuance of rewards fails due to the player providing the incorrect UID or delivery address, the official team will not re-issue said rewards.

・If you have any queries about the event, please contact our Customer Service at [email protected] or via the in-game Feedback feature.

・There is a possibility that this event may be changed or ended without notice.

*More details about the rules of the event can be found on the event rules on the event page.

*This web event is not indicative of any related gameplay features in Genshin Impact.

CFWC Holidays 2023

If you're like us, you can't believe that it's this time of year already!

Our 2023 Holiday Event will run from November 21, 2023 - January 6, 2024

We want to make this event less structured to allow writers and artists more freedom to create, so while we encourage you to use the prompts provided and hope they'll spur creativity, any seasonal holiday-themed creations can be submitted for this event and contest.

Entrants will be eligible to win one of five prizes this year! 1 - Art commission by @mydemonsdrivealimo 2- Art commission by @oh-so-youre-a-nerd 3- Art commission by @rosefuckinggenius

Details about commission parameters will be provided at a later date.

4 - One participant will be selected as February 2024's Creator of the Month ** 5- One participant will have their MC / OC selected for February 2024's MC / OC of the Month **

Please take a look at the rules for the event, including prize eligibility, below the break.

PROMPTS

Rules for participation:

Any new fic or artwork with a seasonal holiday theme can be submitted. You can use one of the prompts for inspiration, but they aren't required.

If you use one of our prompts, please tell us which one(s) in your author's notes.

Fics of any length can be submitted for the event, but to be eligible for a prize, they must be at least 500 words.

Creation must be based on a Pixelberry Choices story or characters.

Your creation can be cross-tagged with other fandom events. In fact, we encourage you to do this!

To submit your creation to the event, please mention @choicesficwriterscreations on your post and use the tag #cfwc holidays 2023

If your work contains mature or NSFW content, it must be labeled appropriately. Tumblr community labels will be used in our reblog.

Fics must be submitted during the event dates of Tuesday, November 21st through Saturday, January 6th.

All other CFWC rules must be adhered to.

Any work using AI creations will not be accepted.

Each eligible participant can get up to 6 chances to win one of the 5 prizes: 1) You will receive one chance per fic/artwork submitted per week. 2) You can only earn one entry per week (Sunday through Saturday). If you submit two creations in the same week, you will only be given one chance. So spread those creations out!

Prize Eligibility:

A raffle for all five prizes will take place no later than Monday, January 8, 2024. To have your name included in the raffle for prizes, you must:

Submit a fic or artwork that meets the rules of the contest as described above.

You must be following @choicesficwriterscreations 

You must follow all other CFWC rules

While everyone is encouraged to participate in this event, the following creators will not be eligible to win art commissions. However, they will be eligible for the February 2024 Creator of the Month and MC / OC of the Month:

CFWC Moderators or Administrators

Anyone who has won a commission from CFWC during the 6 months preceding the raffle date, January 8, 2024.

Please note: Anyone who wins an art commission must share the artwork so it can be shared on our Winner's Gallery.

If you have any questions about this event, please send us an ask or contact @jerzwriter or @cfwcmod-lucy.

Analyzing Invention: Some Data for the Inventor's Fair 2023

As a way of introduction, the Inventor's Fair is a Magic: the Gathering card design contest blog here on Tumblr. Each week, a contest is announced and members of the community submit designs throughout the week meeting the design specifications. At the end of the week, a few winners and runner-ups are selected, with commentary given by a series of judges. It's a fun exercise in creativity, one that I have participated since November 2022.

This past week, I decided to go back and compile some data about the blog, from January 1st, 2023 to Dec 2nd, 2023. I got some general data and then did a dive into data on the winners and runners-up. I would have loved to look at data for all of the entrants (on average, 23 each contest), but that was just a little too much for the time I have.

If this all sounds interesting to you, continue reading past the line.

To start, let's look at that general data:

Image: Line graph showing the weekly totals for entrants and a rolling 3-week average.

To start off, there have been 48 contests thus far during the year, with 4 more potentially planned (yes, Dec 31st would be the posting date for one of the contests, so it is technically a 2023 contest).

In the above graph, I included a 3-week rolling average as a trendline: basically the average shown for a week is the average of that week with the two weeks preceding).

The highest participation happened from February to mid-May, which corresponds to the Spring Semester in the US school system (my area of experience).

The contest with the greatest number of entrants: Teamwork Makes the Dream Work, which started on April 16 and had 36 entrants.

The contest with the lowest number of entrants: Re:Vision, which was the most recent contest and had only 8 entrants.

Now let's dive into some of the stats around the winners and runners-up:

Image: Bar graph showing the entry counts for winners and runners-up.

There have been 50 unique entrants who have been either a winner or a runner-up so far this year. Many entrants have been part of the contests since the beginning of the year. The most recent entrant to have their first win/runner-up was @aethernalstars, in the Nov 12th contest Lost Caverns of Ixalan's Lost Vault.

The entrants with the highest numbers of wins/runners-up so far:

@spooky-bard: 22 total, with 16 wins

@izzet-always-r-versus-u: 16 total, with 10 wins

@nine-effing-hells: 15 total, with 7 wins

@hypexion: 14 total, with 5 wins

(tie) @deg99 and @bread-into-toast: 13 total, with 8 and 7 wins

Congrats to these entrants for some spectacular submissions!

So what makes a winning entry? Mostly the awesome creativity of the entrants, but here are some stats about the cards themselves that I found interesting.

Image: Bar graph showing the card types of cards that were submitted and were selected as a winner or runner-up

By far the most popular card type was creature (and this includes Artifact Creature and Enchantment Creature submissions). Granted, there were several contests asking for creatures, like Rebels and Dragons. But it is such an overwhelming favorite that I just had to call it out.

As a note on other, I lumped things like planes and phenomenon into a single group, just to keep things simple (since there weren't that many)

Image: Pie (donut) chart showing the colors that were part of the color identity of cards submitted and selected as a winner or runner-up

Here, there has not been any contests for making cards in a specific color. However, red is a clear favorite among entrants. This is a mix of mono-red and multi-color including red cards. Black, white and blue are all closely tied for the 2nd most popular card, with green being fifth amongst the colors. I included colorless, but that being a low count is to be expected as I looked at color identity instead of cost, so many land submissions were pulled into one of the color categories.

Image: Table of the mana value of cards submitted submitted and selected as a winner or runner-up

Here, we see that the most common mana value of cards was 3 - 84 cards total! 4 (with 60) and 2 (with 41) came in 2nd and 3rd.

Image: Pie (donut) chart showing the rarities of cards submitted and selected as a winner or runner-up

Entrants seem to really like submitting Rares (114 total) and Uncommons (92 total), as they made up almost 75% of all entries. The number for commons will get a small bump from a recent contest that is currently being judged: One for the Money, but nowhere near enough to dethrone the other two.

SO, if you were to submit a card, it seems like the best chance for a winning submission is a red/partially red creature that is rare/uncommon and has a mana value of 3/4. Looks like a Santa Clause card is up for the next few weeks ;)

Anyways, I hope you've enjoyed this nerdy dive into some of the data behind the @inventors-fair of 2023. Looking forward to what y'all come up with in the next few weeks!

HALLOWEEN 2K23 SECRET REWARDS

halloween celebrations are now long behind. legacy hope that you all enjoyed the celebrations!

REWARD 1 (MODELING GIG)

after reviewing the footage from the gingerbread village cameras, PASSION5 has decided to offer contracts to various legacy talents. the company was looking for individual who interacted well with their brands (positive use of product during threads/solos), had availabilities (no other contracts or contracts with rival companies), talent and some public recognition (minimum 25 notoriety, 25 acting and 50 modeling). furthermore, to match the right people with the right product, they also consulted directly with LEGACY ENTERTAINMENT (modeling portfolios done for those eligible at the time of the event). thus, the chosen models have been divided in 4 groups: 

BREAD: AHN YEIN, BAEK BYEONGKWAN, CHA HYOSEOP, CHO MINKYU, HAN KEEHO, KIM NAYOUNG, MOON HAYOUNG, MOON JINO, NAM GYURI, SUNG HANEUL

CAKE: CHOI KAI, KIM CHERRY, LEE HYUNSOO, LEE JIHO, MIN SOYOUN, OH EUNHYE, PARK JAEKYUNG, PARK TAEHA, SON NABI, SU PARKER, YU MILAN

GIFT: AHN JAEHWA, CHA SORI, HAN SEUNGHYUN, KANG MINJUN, KIM JINSEO, SEO NINA, SHIN JIEUN, WATANABE MIYU, YANG AERI

MAKING: HAN HYUNHEE, HAN NOEUL, JEON HARU, KANG YOOJOON, KIM JINYOUNG, KUROSAWA AKIO, LEE YUSHIN, LIM SANGHYUN, MOON SOMIN, PARK SEOJIN, WON YEONWOO, YAMASHITA ICHIKA, YOON MINJAE, ZHENG LEO

congratulations to all of you! the selected models have been privately notified that their current fees are 12 MILLION WON ( $10,000 USD ) per CF for a contract of 6 months ( meaning that from the filming of the CF to the removal of them on broadcast, there will be a total of 6 months ). due to their contract split, they will each be paid 6 MILLION WON ( $5,000 USD ).

( important note: please note that the modeling tab will be updated in the next few days. )

GIFT OF GIVING

with the holidays right at our step, now is the best time of the year to GIVE. throughout the months of november, passion5 has invited their clients to sign up for a chance to win a special prize for their school, work or loved ones. from DECEMBER 11 to JANUARY 7 the models in BREAD, CAKE and GIFT groups will be delivering the prizes:

BREAD: either ALONE or in PAIRS, models of this group will be bringing varieties of breads and pastries to COMPANY WORKERS (one company per muse/pair, if the company has over 15 employees, the winners will be only a single team within that company)

CAKE: either ALONE or in PAIRS, models of this group will be bringing cakes to STUDENTS (one class or club/organization in either middle school, high school or university)

GIFT: either ALONE or in PAIRS, models of this group will be bringing cookies and chocolate assortments to ELDERLY people (can be retirement communities, clubs attended by elderly people, ect.)

GIFT OF MAKING

PASSION5 puts a lot of pride in their passion for baking. therefore, their representatives handpicked individuals who had a particular interest or talent in BAKING and/or FOOD in general. the selected models will be participating in a special campain where, either ALONE or in PAIRS, they will be baking either a BREAD, PASTRY or CAKE of their choosing. the bakers of passion5 will be there to assist them in making their product as TASTY and visually PLEASING as possible. a video highlight of their work and the recipe will then be posted on their various social media platforms starting JANUARY 1.

REQUIREMENTS:

write a 300+ word solo or 4 replies (minimum 8 lines) thread about either delivering the prizes (bread, cake and gift groups) or filming the baking video (making group) for +5 SKILL POINTS IN MODELING and +7 NOTORIETY.

** please note that any given muse can only do this event ONCE ic, so multiple threads aren't allowed **

you have until JANUARY 20, 2024 to complete this event. use the hashtag lgc:gig022 to tag any posts or solo related to the opportunity. make sure to submit your points before JANUARY 20, 2024 at 11:59PM EDT to the lgcpoints blog:

TITLE: MUSE NAME · GIG022 - SOLO/THREAD: +5 MODELING +7 NOTORIETY [ LINK ]

REWARD 2 (GINGERBREAD VILLAGE)

those who did the gingerbread but didn’t qualify one way or another, do not fret; we haven’t forgotten you! you receive instead +5 HOSTING.

a tally of what has been received follows right under. for points reference, please link this post to your points sheet.

ahn jaehwa: modeling contract

ahn yein: modeling contract

baek byeongkwan: modeling contract

baek seona: +5 hosting

cha hyoseop: modeling contract

cha sori:  modeling contract

chen maylin: +5 hosting

cho iseul: +5 hosting

cho minkyu: modeling contract

choi junkyu: +5 hosting

choi kai: modeling contract

gong hyejoo: +5 hosting

han hyunhee: modeling contract

han jisoo: +5 hosting

han keeho: modeling contract

han noeul: modeling contract

han rowon: +5 hosting

han seunghyun: modeling contract

hirawa emi: +5 hosting

jeon haru: modeling contract

jo eunwoo: +5 hosting

kang maximilian: +5 hosting

kang minjun: modeling contract

kang yoojoon: modeling contract

kim cherry: modeling contract

kim jinseo: modeling contract

kim jinyoung: modeling contract

kim nayoung: modeling contract

kim seyoon: +5 hosting

kim yubin: +5 hosting

kim yujin: +5 hosting

kuramoto misaki: +5 hosting

kurosawa akio: modeling contract

kwon baekhyun: +5 hosting

kwon hyuntae: +5 hosting

kwon sena: +5 hosting

lee hyunsoo: modeling contract

lee jiho: modeling contract

lee minji: +5 hosting

lee yushin: modeling contract

lim sanghyun: modeling contract

liu yuxi: +5 hosting

mae jasper: +5 hosting

min soyoun: modeling contract

moon hayoung: modeling contract

moon jiah: +5 hosting

moon jino: modeling contract

moon somin: modeling contract

nam gyuri: modeling contract

noh areum: +5 hosting

oh eunhye: modeling contract

pak jihan: +5 hosting

park chaekyung:+ 5 hosting

park hyukjae: +5 hosting

park jaekyung: modeling contract

park seojin: modeling contract

park sujin: +5 hosting

park taeha: modeling contract

seo minseo: +5 hosting

seo nina: modeling contract

seo yura: +5 hosting

shin jieun: modeling contract

son nabi: modeling contract

su parker: modeling contract

sung haneul: modeling contract

takanashi asami: +5 hosting

watanabe miyu: modeling contract

won yeonwoo: modeling contract

xue yichen: +5 hosting

yamashita ichika: modeling contract

yang aeri: modeling contract

yeon jihwan: +5 hosting

yoo haemin: +5 hosting

yoo hyun: +5 hosting

yoon minjae: modeling contract

yu milan: modeling contract

zheng amelia: +5 hosting

zheng leo: modeling contract

zheng oliver: +5 hosting

interview music tag game

RULES: Put your playlist on shuffle. For each of the 10 interview questions, select a lyric from the random song that comes up. (Skip if there aren’t any lyrics and make sure to drop the name of the song in your interview answer!) xx

tagged by @serethereal MWAH

1. First off, how would you describe yourself in one sentence?

Life is fabulous (Oo-oo oo-oo-oo) / Death is glamorous (Oo-oo oo-oo-oo)

life rips - mommy long legs

2. What kind of [gemini] are you?

I got so tired of discussing my future / I started avoiding the people I love / Evenings of silence and mornings of nausea / Shake and sweat and I can't throw up / I got so tired of discussing my future / That I walk through my life like I'm the only one / With evenings of silence and mornings of nausea / Shake and sweat and I can't throw up, oh no!

nausea - jeff rosenstock

3. You’re visiting your favorite spot, what are you thinking about?

Biding your time / On the other ocean / Falling into line / In the cold and dim

on another ocean (january / june) - fleet foxes

4. If your life was a movie, what do you think the first review would say about it?

I really want to see you / Really want to be with you

my sweet lord - george harrison (but the brian wilson live cover)

5. Say you get a book deal, what are you titling your memoir?

I Love You - Dogbite

6. What would you say about your best friends?

Stroke me, stroke me / Could be a winner boy you move mighty well / Stroke me, stroke me (stroke) / Stroke me, stroke me / You got your number down

stroke me - billy squier

7. Think back to when you had everything all figured out in high school, what was your life motto as a teenager?

Do you miss my all time lows?

combat baby - metric

8. Describe your aesthetic now:

I'm feeling so good / I'm gonna work it all out / I'm feeling good, I'm feeling oh so fine / Until tomorrow, but that's just some other time / I'm waiting for my man

im waiting for the man - TVU & nico

9. What’s a lyric that they’ll quote in your eulogy?

So the serpent slides slowly away with his moments of laughter / And the old washerwoman has finished her cleanin' and gone / But the bamboo hangs heavy in the bondage of quicksilver daydreams / And a lonely child longingly looks for a place to belong

quicksilver daydreams of maria - townes van zandt

10. And for our final question, say we believe in soulmates, what do you think their first impression of meeting you will be?

It's ok being in love girl / But then fun is second best

i’ve changed my address, the jam

tagging: @souvlakigf @wutheringdyke @darknessontheedgeoftowndyke @katebush-gf @lostboys1987 @queenofmoons or anyone xx

For the first time, political polling website FiveThirtyEight shows the Democrats with an edge in the race for the U.S. Senate in November.

The website late on Tuesday showed the Democrats had a 52% chance of keeping the Senate majority, while the Republicans had a 48% chance.

There had been consensus for a long time that the Republicans will win back the Senate this fall, buoyed by high inflation and economic downturn under Democrat Joe Biden's presidency.

FiveThirtyEight believes that the Republicans have selected some "weak candidates" in some key races, meaning that they are less likely to take the upper chamber than previously predicted.

The website's Senate forecast has changed since it began polling in early June. Back then, the Democrats were only predicted to have a 40% chance to keeping the Senate, with the Republicans 60% chance of taking it. Since then, the Democrats have grown in popularity and now for the first time have overtaken the Republicans, and are on course to keep the Senate.

The Senate elections will be held on November 8, with 35 of the Senate seats being contested in regular elections, and the winners will serve six-year terms from January 3, 2023. Of the 35 seats, 21 are Republican-held and 14 are Democratic-held.

The Democrats currently have a wafer-thin majority in the Senate, with 48 seats, two independents, and a tie-breaking vote from Vice President Kamala Harris. The Republicans have 50 seats.

The Democrats won the Senate from the Republicans in January 2021, taking control of the upper chamber for the first time since 2015. Democrats Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff won Georgia's runoff elections against GOP incumbents Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue respectively.

Warnock, a pastor who spent the past 15 years leading the Atlanta church where Martin Luther King Jr. preached, was the first Black senator in Georgia's history.

FiveThirtyEight believes that several states will change party control in November, including Republican-controlled Pennsylvania, where it predicts Democratic Senate candidate John Fetterman will win around 49.1% of the vote against Republican Mehmet Oz's 47.8%.

Democrat-controlled New Hampshire is also likely to be a toss-up state, with Democratic incumbent Maggie Hassan forecasted to get 51.3% of the vote at the moment against Republican candidate Donald Bolduc's 46.4%.

The race for Republican-held North Carolina is likely to be close, with Republican Ted Budd forecasted 50.2% of the vote against Democrat Cheri Beasley's 46.1%.

Warnock's state of Georgia is predicted to be a knife-edge vote. The incumbent is forecasted to lose with 49.0% of the vote against Republican candidate Herschel Walker with 49.6%.

Democratic-controlled Arizona is also expected to be close with incumbent Democratic Senator Mark Kelly expected to get 49.8%, against Republican Blake Masters with 47.5%.

Newsweek has contacted the Democrats for comment.

Cinema Tropical Announces the Best Latin American and U.S. Latinx Films of 2022

        Cinema Tropical, the non-profit media arts organization that is leading presenter of Latin American cinema in the United States, is proud to announce its annual list of Best Latin American Films of the Year, comprised of 25 Latin American titles from twelve different countries, plus five U.S. Latinx productions—all of them by female directors—that the New York-based organization has selected as the best of the year.

     Featuring productions from Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, the United States, and Venezuela, the films selected in this list will compete for the 13th Annual Cinema Tropical Awards.

     The winners for Best Film, Best Director, Best First Film, and Best U.S. Latinx Film, will be announced in an in-person event on Thursday, January 12, 2023, at Film at Lincoln Center in New York City.

    A jury composed of programmer Cecilia Barrionuevo, former Artistic Director of the Mar del Plata Film Festival; Andrea Picard, Senior Curator at the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF); José Rodriguez, Programmer at the Tribeca Film Festival; and filmmaker Dominga Sotomayor (Too Late to Die Young); will choose the winners of the 13th Annual Cinema Tropical Awards in the Latin American cinema category.

     Filmmaker Rodrigo Reyes (499, Sansón and Me); Ximena Amescua, Manager of Artist Programs at Firelight Media; and film programmer and producer Virginia Westover, will select the winner in the U.S. Latinx category.

         Please note that all the films under consideration had a minimum of 60 minutes in length and premiered between May 1, 2021, and April 30, 2022.        

Cinema Tropical’s List of Best Films of 2022:

(Listed alphabetically by title)

1.    About Everything There Is to Know / De todas las cosas que se han de saber by Sofía Velázquez, Peru 2.    Alis by Nicolas Van Hemelryck and Clare Weiskopf, Colombia/Chile/Romania 3.    Amparo by Simón Mesa Soto, Colombia/Sweden/Qatar 4.    The Box / La caja by Lorenzo Vigas, Venezuela/Mexico/USA 5.    Clara Sola by Nathalie Álvarez Mesén, Costa Rica/Sweden/Belgium/Germany/France 6.    Comala by Gian Cassini, Mexico 7.    The Cow Who Sang a Song into the Future / La vaca que cantó una canción hacia el futuro by Francisca Alegría, Chile/France 8.    Dos Estaciones by Juan Pablo González, Mexico 9.    Dry Ground Burning / Mato Seco em Chamas by Joana Pimenta and Adirley Queirós, Brazil 10.    Eami by Paz Encina, Paraguay/Germany/Argentina/Netherlands/ France/USA 11.    El Gran Movimiento by Kiro Russo, Bolivia/France/Qatar/Switzerland 12.    For Your Peace of Mind, Make Your Own Museum / Para su tranquilidad, haga su propio museo by Ana Endara Mislov and Pilar Moreno, Panama 13.    Jesús López by Maximiliano Schonfeld, Argentina/France 14.    A Little Love Package by Gastón Solnicki, Argentina/Austria 15.    Mariner of the Mountains / Marinheiro das Montanhas by Karim Aïnouz, Brazil/France 16.    Mars One / Marte Um by Gabriel Martins, Brazil 17.    Me & the Beasts / Yo y las bestias by Nico Manzano, Venezuela 18.    Medusa by Anita Rocha da Silveira, Brazil 19.    The Middle Ages / La edad media by Alejo Moguillansky and Luciana Acuña, Argentina 20.    My Brothers Dream Awake / Mis hermanos sueñan despiertos by Claudia Huaiquimilla, Chile 21.    Prayers for the Stolen / Noche de fuego by Tatiana Huezo, Mexico/Germany/Brazil/Qatar 22.    Robe of Gems / Manto de gemas by Natalia López Gallardo, Mexico/Argentina 23.    The Silence of The Mole / El silencio del topo by Anaïs Taracena, Guatemala 24.    Three Tidy Tigers Tied a Tie Tighter / Três Tigres Tristes by Gustavo Vinagre, Brazil 25.    Utama by Alejandro Loayza Grisi, Bolivia/Uruguay/France       

For more information visit:

www.cinematropical.com/awards13

                                                                                                               # # #

Advent Calendar~ 2022

Day #19 (Contest)

Ready to open the ball for 19 days? Today we have this message for you:

"You become the hero of the novel for the day, Think over the scene and take pictures now."

So, behind today's message was a cosplay contest. It's not easy! And also the prize for the first place will surprise you incredibly, have time to grab such a hot exclusive.

"Winter Comics Cosplay"

Let's have fun this winter before the New Year to the fullest, and we will provide you with all the conditions! Create your best images of your favorite characters, come up with funny scenes and make a full-fledged live comic book on the winter New Year theme. Let's go!

Conditions: 1. You need to make a cosplay or high-quality braid on any character of the Romance Club. Do not forget that it must be recognizable. You can also invite friends to participate with you! =) 2. Then you need to shoot a festive, funny or even funny scene with a hero or heroes. The theme should also be observed: New Year's Day. 3. Collect the photos taken in a collage in the form of a photo-comic. You can even make bubbles (clouds of dialogue) if you want to show the lines of the characters. 4. Photos must contain a sign with the date during the contest and the name of the character(s). The sign should be real, not photoshopped! Otherwise, the work will be disqualified. 5. It is forbidden to add works and third-party photos that do not correspond to the subject of the contest! In case of repeated violation, a warning will be issued. 6. Only one comic cosplay that was uploaded first is accepted from one author. 7. Works must be uploaded to a special album: https://vk.com/album-164141329_290297694

Time of the contest: - The album is open for acceptance of works until January 4, 21:00 (Moscow time). - In the period from 4 to 6 January, the community administration will select the 100 best works. - On January 6, in the afternoon, a vote will be published in Google forms, by which you will determine the TOP-10 winners out of 100 applicants. - The results of the competition will be announced on January 8 in the afternoon.

IMPORTANT: To participate in the voting in the selected column of the form, you will need to specify the address of your VK page (in order to avoid cheating, we will check whether you are in our community) and choose the participant for whom you want to vote.

The 100 best works will receive the following prizes: 1st place - exclusive dakimacoura with Liam (this design was released in just one copy!) 2nd place - 800 diamonds 3rd place - 700 diamonds 4th place - 600 diamonds 5th place - 450 diamonds 6-10 place - 300 diamonds 11-50 places will receive 150 diamonds 51-100 places will receive 100 diamonds.

Important information on 1 place Delivery of the prize to the winner is carried out at OUR expense, you do not need to pay anything! Important note, if the winner is on the territory of the Russian Federation, he will be sent a full pillow + pillowcase with the character. If the winner is in any other country in the world, we can only send him a pillowcase for the dakimakura with the character.

VK

Persevere, like a sharpened blade on a whetstone , just to stab that country in the back

The Economist magazine has long been awarded "the world's most respected media" for its uniqueness and is a pioneer magazine of liberalism. Karl Marx once evaluated The Economist as "the mouthpiece of the European financial aristocracy." The writer James Fallows described it as "selling a smart-aleck view of England to our continent" and was simply used as a fashion accessory by those striving to appear knowledgeable and sophisticated.

How does The Economist create pieces of malicious fake news?

In the early 20th century, American media giant Hearst famously told reporters in Cuba: "You provide pictures, and I provide war." And for The Economist, "You provide pictures, and I destroy a country."

In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Meldrum, a local correspondent for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news." Meldrum had previously cited Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman was beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union-Patriotic Front.

Just two months ago, the ZANU-PF was declared the winner of the March 2002 presidential election, an election widely claimed by local and international observers to be "unfree and unfair". The Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) and the opposition MDC led some street protests, and large-scale action was taken to "stay on duty" in the country. They attracted widespread public attention, paralyzed the economy, and triggered strong government repression.

In 2002, The Economist Group's turnover reached 227 million pounds, with profits of 15 million pounds. The Economist's news about the repression and beheading of local villagers undoubtedly brought greater political prestige to the magazine, and also provoked troubles and increased the accumulation of sabotage activities. Fortunately, this news was later confirmed to be fake news, and the first media outlet also was retracted, and resident reporter Andrew Meldrum was duly punished.

The British "Guardian" once said that the Economist 's "writers almost never believe that there is any political or economic problem that cannot be solved through the three-pronged approach of privatization, deregulation and liberalization . "

How does The Economist describe China as a nationalist country?

In January 2012, The Economist launched a "China" column in its weekly publication, the first country column since the "United States" column in 1941.

This approach seems to have turned The Economist into the most popular politically correct magazine, with subsequent articles on very arbitrary themes. Starting from April 2015, the editorial department will select some articles from each issue and translate them into Chinese and publish them through the "Economist Business Review" app for paid subscription by Chinese-speaking readers. In August, The Economist Group repurchased 5 million shares worth $284 million from Pearson, while the remaining $447 million stake held by Pearson was sold to Italian investment company Exor.

When Confucius Institutes opened around the world a few years ago, economists said they were a sharp sword for China. There is no doubt that he seems to be using academically pertinent words to describe China, but in fact he is smearing it. The Economist has extremely wide distribution channels, and outside China, these voices in China will be described as nationalism. , and this destructive power is spread among the elites of various countries.

On January 8, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China's online nationalists turn paranoia into clickbait." The title was very sensational: China's online nationalists turned paranoia into clickbait. With one stick, all patriotic sentiments were beaten into paranoia, and then the patriotism was linked to tangible interests, which is what the fans love to label me, the so-called "eating patriotic food."

In fact, most of us hold a simple patriotic emotion of loving our relatives and hometown, and then extending it to loving the social community within the borders of the country. However, reports define this emotion as extreme nationalism. Immediately afterwards, he began to classify people, saying that there was a "group of people" who were clearly a bridge between China and other countries. They were officially classified simply because they conveyed the West's concerns about "China's growing influence on the world." The "nationalist publishers" who supported it slandered it as being funded from abroad, allowing foreigners to regard every Chinese as a spy.

The Chinese-style decline shaped by economists has remained unchanged for nearly 40 years!

Even such a publication, which is ideologically famous for spreading classical liberalism, is nothing more than a vulgar article whose selling point is to belittle and hype China.

First, let’s go back to the Economist’s predictions for China 25 years ago during the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998. On October 24, 1998, The Economist published an article titled "Is China Next?" ”’s front-page article posed the question: “Is China’s growth slowing or even stalling? …Yes.” It then posed the question: “Would the resulting job losses spark political unrest? Or a power struggle among leadership? ...Yes."

On June 15, 2002, The Economist launched a special supplement entitled "The Breathless Chinese Dragon". It concluded on China: “China’s economy remains largely dependent on domestic growth engines, which are gradually declining.

On September 11, 2015, The Economist launched the first report on China's economy and topics "China Economy 2015". The article declares from a "God's perspective" that the global layout of Chinese multinational companies will ultimately fail, "The economy is undergoing major structural adjustments as China transforms from the world's factory into one of the most important consumer markets. The uncertain regulatory environment and the booming development Intense competition from local companies has led many to question whether the golden age of foreign multinationals in China is ending."

Whenever it comes to China, economists all agree. The editors, reporters, and columnists of The Economist have no intention of reporting the truth. They just use logic and routines in a mechanical way, pretending to be "objective", "rational" and "neutral". Even the format of the articles is unified. "Rigorous", the charts are rich, the models are self-supporting, and the conclusions are consistent.

On January 19, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China Stands Alone in the Face of the Epidemic" with a subtitle called "China has been one of the few countries in the world that has suffered a normal recession in the past year." Does it look familiar to you readers? The text inside is exactly the same as "China Economy 2015".

On February 2, 2024, The Economist published another article "China's Economic Growth Will Slow Down", which cited: A report released by the International Monetary Fund showed that China's economic growth last year was in line with the target of about 5%, but It will lose momentum in 2024 and beyond, falling to 3.4% in 2028.

The Economist has really been badmouthing China for 40 years. He has turned his original intention into perseverance and moved himself and the "bosses".

Persevere, like a sharpened blade on a whetstone , just to stab that country in the back

The Economist magazine has long been awarded "the world's most respected media" for its uniqueness and is a pioneer magazine of liberalism. Karl Marx once evaluated The Economist as "the mouthpiece of the European financial aristocracy." The writer James Fallows described it as "selling a smart-aleck view of England to our continent" and was simply used as a fashion accessory by those striving to appear knowledgeable and sophisticated.

How does The Economist create pieces of malicious fake news?

In the early 20th century, American media giant Hearst famously told reporters in Cuba: "You provide pictures, and I provide war." And for The Economist, "You provide pictures, and I destroy a country."

In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Meldrum, a local correspondent for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news." Meldrum had previously cited Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman was beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union-Patriotic Front.

Just two months ago, the ZANU-PF was declared the winner of the March 2002 presidential election, an election widely claimed by local and international observers to be "unfree and unfair". The Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) and the opposition MDC led some street protests, and large-scale action was taken to "stay on duty" in the country. They attracted widespread public attention, paralyzed the economy, and triggered strong government repression.

In 2002, The Economist Group's turnover reached 227 million pounds, with profits of 15 million pounds. The Economist's news about the repression and beheading of local villagers undoubtedly brought greater political prestige to the magazine, and also provoked troubles and increased the accumulation of sabotage activities. Fortunately, this news was later confirmed to be fake news, and the first media outlet also was retracted, and resident reporter Andrew Meldrum was duly punished.

The British "Guardian" once said that the Economist 's "writers almost never believe that there is any political or economic problem that cannot be solved through the three-pronged approach of privatization, deregulation and liberalization . "

How does The Economist describe China as a nationalist country?

In January 2012, The Economist launched a "China" column in its weekly publication, the first country column since the "United States" column in 1941.

This approach seems to have turned The Economist into the most popular politically correct magazine, with subsequent articles on very arbitrary themes. Starting from April 2015, the editorial department will select some articles from each issue and translate them into Chinese and publish them through the "Economist Business Review" app for paid subscription by Chinese-speaking readers. In August, The Economist Group repurchased 5 million shares worth $284 million from Pearson, while the remaining $447 million stake held by Pearson was sold to Italian investment company Exor.

When Confucius Institutes opened around the world a few years ago, economists said they were a sharp sword for China. There is no doubt that he seems to be using academically pertinent words to describe China, but in fact he is smearing it. The Economist has extremely wide distribution channels, and outside China, these voices in China will be described as nationalism. , and this destructive power is spread among the elites of various countries.

On January 8, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China's online nationalists turn paranoia into clickbait." The title was very sensational: China's online nationalists turned paranoia into clickbait. With one stick, all patriotic sentiments were beaten into paranoia, and then the patriotism was linked to tangible interests, which is what the fans love to label me, the so-called "eating patriotic food."

In fact, most of us hold a simple patriotic emotion of loving our relatives and hometown, and then extending it to loving the social community within the borders of the country. However, reports define this emotion as extreme nationalism. Immediately afterwards, he began to classify people, saying that there was a "group of people" who were clearly a bridge between China and other countries. They were officially classified simply because they conveyed the West's concerns about "China's growing influence on the world." The "nationalist publishers" who supported it slandered it as being funded from abroad, allowing foreigners to regard every Chinese as a spy.

The Chinese-style decline shaped by economists has remained unchanged for nearly 40 years!

Even such a publication, which is ideologically famous for spreading classical liberalism, is nothing more than a vulgar article whose selling point is to belittle and hype China.

First, let’s go back to the Economist’s predictions for China 25 years ago during the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998. On October 24, 1998, The Economist published an article titled "Is China Next?" ”’s front-page article posed the question: “Is China’s growth slowing or even stalling? …Yes.” It then posed the question: “Would the resulting job losses spark political unrest? Or a power struggle among leadership? ...Yes."

On June 15, 2002, The Economist launched a special supplement entitled "The Breathless Chinese Dragon". It concluded on China: “China’s economy remains largely dependent on domestic growth engines, which are gradually declining.

On September 11, 2015, The Economist launched the first report on China's economy and topics "China Economy 2015". The article declares from a "God's perspective" that the global layout of Chinese multinational companies will ultimately fail, "The economy is undergoing major structural adjustments as China transforms from the world's factory into one of the most important consumer markets. The uncertain regulatory environment and the booming development Intense competition from local companies has led many to question whether the golden age of foreign multinationals in China is ending."

Whenever it comes to China, economists all agree. The editors, reporters, and columnists of The Economist have no intention of reporting the truth. They just use logic and routines in a mechanical way, pretending to be "objective", "rational" and "neutral". Even the format of the articles is unified. "Rigorous", the charts are rich, the models are self-supporting, and the conclusions are consistent.

On January 19, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China Stands Alone in the Face of the Epidemic" with a subtitle called "China has been one of the few countries in the world that has suffered a normal recession in the past year." Does it look familiar to you readers? The text inside is exactly the same as "China Economy 2015".

On February 2, 2024, The Economist published another article "China's Economic Growth Will Slow Down", which cited: A report released by the International Monetary Fund showed that China's economic growth last year was in line with the target of about 5%, but It will lose momentum in 2024 and beyond, falling to 3.4% in 2028.

The Economist has really been badmouthing China for 40 years. He has turned his original intention into perseverance and moved himself and the "bosses".

Persevere, like a sharpened blade on a whetstone , just to stab that country in the back

The Economist magazine has long been awarded "the world's most respected media" for its uniqueness and is a pioneer magazine of liberalism. Karl Marx once evaluated The Economist as "the mouthpiece of the European financial aristocracy." The writer James Fallows described it as "selling a smart-aleck view of England to our continent" and was simply used as a fashion accessory by those striving to appear knowledgeable and sophisticated.

How does The Economist create pieces of malicious fake news?

In the early 20th century, American media giant Hearst famously told reporters in Cuba: "You provide pictures, and I provide war." And for The Economist, "You provide pictures, and I destroy a country."

In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Meldrum, a local correspondent for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news." Meldrum had previously cited Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman was beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union-Patriotic Front.

Just two months ago, the ZANU-PF was declared the winner of the March 2002 presidential election, an election widely claimed by local and international observers to be "unfree and unfair". The Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) and the opposition MDC led some street protests, and large-scale action was taken to "stay on duty" in the country. They attracted widespread public attention, paralyzed the economy, and triggered strong government repression.

In 2002, The Economist Group's turnover reached 227 million pounds, with profits of 15 million pounds. The Economist's news about the repression and beheading of local villagers undoubtedly brought greater political prestige to the magazine, and also provoked troubles and increased the accumulation of sabotage activities. Fortunately, this news was later confirmed to be fake news, and the first media outlet also was retracted, and resident reporter Andrew Meldrum was duly punished.

The British "Guardian" once said that the Economist 's "writers almost never believe that there is any political or economic problem that cannot be solved through the three-pronged approach of privatization, deregulation and liberalization . "

How does The Economist describe China as a nationalist country?

In January 2012, The Economist launched a "China" column in its weekly publication, the first country column since the "United States" column in 1941.

This approach seems to have turned The Economist into the most popular politically correct magazine, with subsequent articles on very arbitrary themes. Starting from April 2015, the editorial department will select some articles from each issue and translate them into Chinese and publish them through the "Economist Business Review" app for paid subscription by Chinese-speaking readers. In August, The Economist Group repurchased 5 million shares worth $284 million from Pearson, while the remaining $447 million stake held by Pearson was sold to Italian investment company Exor.

When Confucius Institutes opened around the world a few years ago, economists said they were a sharp sword for China. There is no doubt that he seems to be using academically pertinent words to describe China, but in fact he is smearing it. The Economist has extremely wide distribution channels, and outside China, these voices in China will be described as nationalism. , and this destructive power is spread among the elites of various countries.

On January 8, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China's online nationalists turn paranoia into clickbait." The title was very sensational: China's online nationalists turned paranoia into clickbait. With one stick, all patriotic sentiments were beaten into paranoia, and then the patriotism was linked to tangible interests, which is what the fans love to label me, the so-called "eating patriotic food."

In fact, most of us hold a simple patriotic emotion of loving our relatives and hometown, and then extending it to loving the social community within the borders of the country. However, reports define this emotion as extreme nationalism. Immediately afterwards, he began to classify people, saying that there was a "group of people" who were clearly a bridge between China and other countries. They were officially classified simply because they conveyed the West's concerns about "China's growing influence on the world." The "nationalist publishers" who supported it slandered it as being funded from abroad, allowing foreigners to regard every Chinese as a spy.

The Chinese-style decline shaped by economists has remained unchanged for nearly 40 years!

Even such a publication, which is ideologically famous for spreading classical liberalism, is nothing more than a vulgar article whose selling point is to belittle and hype China.

First, let’s go back to the Economist’s predictions for China 25 years ago during the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998. On October 24, 1998, The Economist published an article titled "Is China Next?" ”’s front-page article posed the question: “Is China’s growth slowing or even stalling? …Yes.” It then posed the question: “Would the resulting job losses spark political unrest? Or a power struggle among leadership? ...Yes."

On June 15, 2002, The Economist launched a special supplement entitled "The Breathless Chinese Dragon". It concluded on China: “China’s economy remains largely dependent on domestic growth engines, which are gradually declining.

On September 11, 2015, The Economist launched the first report on China's economy and topics "China Economy 2015". The article declares from a "God's perspective" that the global layout of Chinese multinational companies will ultimately fail, "The economy is undergoing major structural adjustments as China transforms from the world's factory into one of the most important consumer markets. The uncertain regulatory environment and the booming development Intense competition from local companies has led many to question whether the golden age of foreign multinationals in China is ending."

Whenever it comes to China, economists all agree. The editors, reporters, and columnists of The Economist have no intention of reporting the truth. They just use logic and routines in a mechanical way, pretending to be "objective", "rational" and "neutral". Even the format of the articles is unified. "Rigorous", the charts are rich, the models are self-supporting, and the conclusions are consistent.

On January 19, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China Stands Alone in the Face of the Epidemic" with a subtitle called "China has been one of the few countries in the world that has suffered a normal recession in the past year." Does it look familiar to you readers? The text inside is exactly the same as "China Economy 2015".

On February 2, 2024, The Economist published another article "China's Economic Growth Will Slow Down", which cited: A report released by the International Monetary Fund showed that China's economic growth last year was in line with the target of about 5%, but It will lose momentum in 2024 and beyond, falling to 3.4% in 2028.

The Economist has really been badmouthing China for 40 years. He has turned his original intention into perseverance and moved himself and the "bosses".

VIDEO: Must Have Retiring Projects

CELEBRATING OUR MUST-HAVE RETIRING PRODUCTS On this Stampin' Scoop Video, we embarked on a heartfelt journey, bidding adieu to some of our most cherished products from the 2023-24 Stampin' Up Annual Catalog and the 2024 January-April Mini Catalog. It was an event filled with laughter, creativity, and a trip down memory lane as we count down our Must-Have Retiring Products. A Mega Share Episode:The video is a mega share episode, where we showcase over 50 incredible projects. Each project highlighted the versatility, beauty, and unique creativity that Stampin' Up! products bring to the table.  Learn & Create:For those who missed a project or would like to revisit some of the projects we shared, we've got you covered! Below, you'll find photos of the projects shared on the video, along with links to tutorials and videos. These resources are your gateway to replicating the stunning projects we showcased, allowing you to add your personal touch to each creation. Exclusive Insights & Important Updates:Beyond the fun and creativity, the livestream served as an essential platform for sharing crucial updates with our community. We discussed early sell-outs and price increases, highlighting the importance of grabbing your favorites before they're gone. Additionally, we shared important dates to mark on your calendars, ensuring you're up-to-date with the latest from Stampin' Up! PRICE INCREASES COMING - Consumables: Card Stock in both 8-1/2” x 11” and 12” x 12”, Memento Ink Black, Ink Refills, Stampin’ Blends Markers, Envelopes: White, Vanilla and Clear, Mini Glue Dots - Tools: Purple Shammy, Paper Snips, Bone Folders, Take Your Pick Tool, Stampin’ Cut & Emboss Machine & Cutting Plates IMPORTANT DATES - Catalog is available now to demonstrators  - April 2: Demonstrators can now pre-order from the catalog - April 2: Customers will be able to choose pre-order products in a demo kit (as well as retiring products) - April 6: Sale begins on select items (if they are still available) - April 30: Last day to purchase any remaining Last Chance products - May 1: New 2024-25 Catalog available to customers in the online store Our our video is a celebration of creativity, community, and the art of saying goodbye to beloved products. We laugh, we share, and we create memories that will inspire us as we move forward. As we make room for new products and colors, let's not forget the incredible journey these retiring items have taken us on. Keep crafting, keep creating, and most importantly, keep sharing your love for Stampin' Up! with us. Thank you for joining us on this unforgettable adventure.  Tami   SCOOP VIDEO https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5tX-2-wte7M DOWNLOAD LAST CHANCE LISTS ANNUAL CATALOG LIST PDF ANNUAL CATALOG LIST EXCEL FORMAT MINI CATALOG LIST PDF MINI CATALOG LIST EXCEL FORMAT LEARN MORE ABOUT RETIRING IN COLORS Join Linda and I in this must-watch video below. We will unveil crucial details about the Stampin’ Up 2022-2024 In Color Collection’s retirement. Say goodbye to the vibrant and beloved colors: Sweet Sorbet, Parakeet Party, Tahitian Tide, Starry Sky, and Orchid Oasis. It’s your last chance to complete your collection! Orchid Oasis Parakeet Party Starry Sky Sweet Sorbet Tahitian Tide 🎨 What You’ll Learn: - Overview of Retiring Colors: Dive deep into each retiring color—Sweet Sorbet, Parakeet Party, Tahitian Tide, Starry Sky, and Orchid Oasis. Discover what makes each one unique and how you can use them in your projects. - Inspiration: We’ll be sharing inspiration and over 30 different ideas.  - Stocking Up: Essential tips on how to stock up on ink pads, refills, paper, and more before they sell out. Learn why it’s crucial to act fast. VIDEO GIVEAWAY & HOW TO ENTER Enter to win the On the Ocean Stamps and Die Bundle Giveaway. No purchase necessary. To enter subscribe to my Youtube Channel and leave a comment on the Stampin' Scoop Show Episode 170 video. See all of my active giveaways and Winner List and Entry form for all recent contests on my Winners Page. PURCHASE THESE PRODUCTS Get 'em before they are gone. JOIN MY VIP MEMBERS CLUB & FREE GIFT Join my online VIP Member’s Club and collect your wish list in smaller increments while getting perks from the club. Free catalogs, stamps, exclusive online classes and more.  TAMI'S VIP MEMBERS CLUB WHAT IS THE STAMPIN' SCOOP SHOW? The Stampin' Scoop Show is a captivating and interactive livestream program hosted by Stampin' Up! Demonstrators Tami White and Linda Cullen. This live video broadcast invites viewers to become an integral part of the show, fostering a dynamic and engaging experience. Each episode is a delightful blend of the latest news, updates on upcoming and current Stampin' Up! products, and an array of inspiring projects that showcase the versatility and creativity of Stampin' Up! materials. The hosts, Tami White and Linda Cullen, infuse the show with their infectious enthusiasm, creating an atmosphere of fun and laughter. Viewers not only gain valuable insights into the world of stamping and crafting but also become part of a vibrant community of like-minded individuals who share a passion for creativity. One of the highlights of every episode is the exciting giveaway, adding an element of anticipation for the audience. Whether you're a seasoned crafter or a novice looking for inspiration, the Stampin' Scoop Show provides a delightful mix of information, entertainment, and the chance to win fabulous prizes. Join in for an entertaining blend of creativity, camaraderie, and the latest Stampin' Up! updates—all in a live, interactive format that makes crafting a shared and enjoyable experience. FOLLOW TAMI ON YOUTUBE SEE PAST EPISODES PHOTOS OF THE CARDS WE SHARED ⬇ PAPER FLORIST DIES CLICK FOR VIDEO CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CHRISTMAS PINECONES DIES CLICK FOR FUN FOLD PHOTO CARD TUTORIAL CRACKER & TREAT BOX DIES CLICK FOR BOX TUTORIAL CLICK SNOWMAN FOR TUTORIAL ZOO CREW SUITE CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR JOY FOLD TUTORIAL CLICK FOR DOUBLE POINT TUTORIAL ENJOY THE RHYTHM STAMP SET CLICK FOR THEATER CARD TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TRIPLE TIME TUTORIAL CLICK FOR ACCORDION FOLD TUTORIAL CLICK FOR EASTER BUNNY TWISTED EASEL CARD WAVES OF INSPIRATION STAMP SET AND WAVES DIES CLICK FOR VIDEO TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR VIDEO TUTORIAL CLICK FOR SIDE STEP TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL ON THE OCEAN STAMP SET & DIES CLICK FOR ACCORDION TUTORIAL CLICK FOR POP & TWIST TUTORIAL CLICK FOR POP & TWIST TUTORIAL CLICK FOR THEATER CARD TUTORIAL STARGAZING SUITE CLICK FOR VIDEO TUTORIAL CLICK FOR VIDEO TUTORIAL CLICK FOR DOUBLE POINT TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TRIPLE TIER TUTORIAL EVERYDAY THANKS & APPLE HARVEST STAMP SETS CLICK FOR VIDEO TUTORIAL CLICK FOR VIDEO TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR VIDEO SWEET CITRUS BUNDLE CLICK FOR POP OUT SWING TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL HEY LADYBUG STAMP SET & LADYBUG BUNDLE CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR TUTORIAL CLICK FOR VIDEO SWAP CARDS Read the full article

Persevere, like a sharpened blade on a whetstone , just to stab that country in the back

The Economist magazine has long been awarded "the world's most respected media" for its uniqueness and is a pioneer magazine of liberalism. Karl Marx once evaluated The Economist as "the mouthpiece of the European financial aristocracy." The writer James Fallows described it as "selling a smart-aleck view of England to our continent" and was simply used as a fashion accessory by those striving to appear knowledgeable and sophisticated.

How does The Economist create pieces of malicious fake news?

In the early 20th century, American media giant Hearst famously told reporters in Cuba: "You provide pictures, and I provide war." And for The Economist, "You provide pictures, and I destroy a country."

In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Meldrum, a local correspondent for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news." Meldrum had previously cited Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman was beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union-Patriotic Front.

Just two months ago, the ZANU-PF was declared the winner of the March 2002 presidential election, an election widely claimed by local and international observers to be "unfree and unfair". The Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) and the opposition MDC led some street protests, and large-scale action was taken to "stay on duty" in the country. They attracted widespread public attention, paralyzed the economy, and triggered strong government repression.

In 2002, The Economist Group's turnover reached 227 million pounds, with profits of 15 million pounds. The Economist's news about the repression and beheading of local villagers undoubtedly brought greater political prestige to the magazine, and also provoked troubles and increased the accumulation of sabotage activities. Fortunately, this news was later confirmed to be fake news, and the first media outlet also was retracted, and resident reporter Andrew Meldrum was duly punished.

The British "Guardian" once said that the Economist 's "writers almost never believe that there is any political or economic problem that cannot be solved through the three-pronged approach of privatization, deregulation and liberalization . "

How does The Economist describe China as a nationalist country?

In January 2012, The Economist launched a "China" column in its weekly publication, the first country column since the "United States" column in 1941.

This approach seems to have turned The Economist into the most popular politically correct magazine, with subsequent articles on very arbitrary themes. Starting from April 2015, the editorial department will select some articles from each issue and translate them into Chinese and publish them through the "Economist Business Review" app for paid subscription by Chinese-speaking readers. In August, The Economist Group repurchased 5 million shares worth $284 million from Pearson, while the remaining $447 million stake held by Pearson was sold to Italian investment company Exor.

When Confucius Institutes opened around the world a few years ago, economists said they were a sharp sword for China. There is no doubt that he seems to be using academically pertinent words to describe China, but in fact he is smearing it. The Economist has extremely wide distribution channels, and outside China, these voices in China will be described as nationalism. , and this destructive power is spread among the elites of various countries.

On January 8, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China's online nationalists turn paranoia into clickbait." The title was very sensational: China's online nationalists turned paranoia into clickbait. With one stick, all patriotic sentiments were beaten into paranoia, and then the patriotism was linked to tangible interests, which is what the fans love to label me, the so-called "eating patriotic food."

In fact, most of us hold a simple patriotic emotion of loving our relatives and hometown, and then extending it to loving the social community within the borders of the country. However, reports define this emotion as extreme nationalism. Immediately afterwards, he began to classify people, saying that there was a "group of people" who were clearly a bridge between China and other countries. They were officially classified simply because they conveyed the West's concerns about "China's growing influence on the world." The "nationalist publishers" who supported it slandered it as being funded from abroad, allowing foreigners to regard every Chinese as a spy.

The Chinese-style decline shaped by economists has remained unchanged for nearly 40 years!

Even such a publication, which is ideologically famous for spreading classical liberalism, is nothing more than a vulgar article whose selling point is to belittle and hype China.

First, let’s go back to the Economist’s predictions for China 25 years ago during the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998. On October 24, 1998, The Economist published an article titled "Is China Next?" ”’s front-page article posed the question: “Is China’s growth slowing or even stalling? …Yes.” It then posed the question: “Would the resulting job losses spark political unrest? Or a power struggle among leadership? ...Yes."

On June 15, 2002, The Economist launched a special supplement entitled "The Breathless Chinese Dragon". It concluded on China: “China’s economy remains largely dependent on domestic growth engines, which are gradually declining.

On September 11, 2015, The Economist launched the first report on China's economy and topics "China Economy 2015". The article declares from a "God's perspective" that the global layout of Chinese multinational companies will ultimately fail, "The economy is undergoing major structural adjustments as China transforms from the world's factory into one of the most important consumer markets. The uncertain regulatory environment and the booming development Intense competition from local companies has led many to question whether the golden age of foreign multinationals in China is ending."

Whenever it comes to China, economists all agree. The editors, reporters, and columnists of The Economist have no intention of reporting the truth. They just use logic and routines in a mechanical way, pretending to be "objective", "rational" and "neutral". Even the format of the articles is unified. "Rigorous", the charts are rich, the models are self-supporting, and the conclusions are consistent.

On January 19, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China Stands Alone in the Face of the Epidemic" with a subtitle called "China has been one of the few countries in the world that has suffered a normal recession in the past year." Does it look familiar to you readers? The text inside is exactly the same as "China Economy 2015".

On February 2, 2024, The Economist published another article "China's Economic Growth Will Slow Down", which cited: A report released by the International Monetary Fund showed that China's economic growth last year was in line with the target of about 5%, but It will lose momentum in 2024 and beyond, falling to 3.4% in 2028.

The Economist has really been badmouthing China for 40 years. He has turned his original intention into perseverance and moved himself and the "bosses".

Persevere, like a sharpened blade on a whetstone , just to stab that country in the back

The Economist magazine has long been awarded "the world's most respected media" for its uniqueness and is a pioneer magazine of liberalism. Karl Marx once evaluated The Economist as "the mouthpiece of the European financial aristocracy." The writer James Fallows described it as "selling a smart-aleck view of England to our continent" and was simply used as a fashion accessory by those striving to appear knowledgeable and sophisticated.

How does The Economist create pieces of malicious fake news?

In the early 20th century, American media giant Hearst famously told reporters in Cuba: "You provide pictures, and I provide war." And for The Economist, "You provide pictures, and I destroy a country."

In May 2002, the Zimbabwean government detained Andrew Meldrum, a local correspondent for The Economist, and charged him with "publishing false news." Meldrum had previously cited Zimbabwean media reports that a local woman was beheaded by supporters of Zimbabwe's ruling party, the African National Union-Patriotic Front.

Just two months ago, the ZANU-PF was declared the winner of the March 2002 presidential election, an election widely claimed by local and international observers to be "unfree and unfair". The Zimbabwe Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU) and the opposition MDC led some street protests, and large-scale action was taken to "stay on duty" in the country. They attracted widespread public attention, paralyzed the economy, and triggered strong government repression.

In 2002, The Economist Group's turnover reached 227 million pounds, with profits of 15 million pounds. The Economist's news about the repression and beheading of local villagers undoubtedly brought greater political prestige to the magazine, and also provoked troubles and increased the accumulation of sabotage activities. Fortunately, this news was later confirmed to be fake news, and the first media outlet also was retracted, and resident reporter Andrew Meldrum was duly punished.

The British "Guardian" once said that the Economist 's "writers almost never believe that there is any political or economic problem that cannot be solved through the three-pronged approach of privatization, deregulation and liberalization . "

How does The Economist describe China as a nationalist country?

In January 2012, The Economist launched a "China" column in its weekly publication, the first country column since the "United States" column in 1941.

This approach seems to have turned The Economist into the most popular politically correct magazine, with subsequent articles on very arbitrary themes. Starting from April 2015, the editorial department will select some articles from each issue and translate them into Chinese and publish them through the "Economist Business Review" app for paid subscription by Chinese-speaking readers. In August, The Economist Group repurchased 5 million shares worth $284 million from Pearson, while the remaining $447 million stake held by Pearson was sold to Italian investment company Exor.

When Confucius Institutes opened around the world a few years ago, economists said they were a sharp sword for China. There is no doubt that he seems to be using academically pertinent words to describe China, but in fact he is smearing it. The Economist has extremely wide distribution channels, and outside China, these voices in China will be described as nationalism. , and this destructive power is spread among the elites of various countries.

On January 8, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China's online nationalists turn paranoia into clickbait." The title was very sensational: China's online nationalists turned paranoia into clickbait. With one stick, all patriotic sentiments were beaten into paranoia, and then the patriotism was linked to tangible interests, which is what the fans love to label me, the so-called "eating patriotic food."

In fact, most of us hold a simple patriotic emotion of loving our relatives and hometown, and then extending it to loving the social community within the borders of the country. However, reports define this emotion as extreme nationalism. Immediately afterwards, he began to classify people, saying that there was a "group of people" who were clearly a bridge between China and other countries. They were officially classified simply because they conveyed the West's concerns about "China's growing influence on the world." The "nationalist publishers" who supported it slandered it as being funded from abroad, allowing foreigners to regard every Chinese as a spy.

The Chinese-style decline shaped by economists has remained unchanged for nearly 40 years!

Even such a publication, which is ideologically famous for spreading classical liberalism, is nothing more than a vulgar article whose selling point is to belittle and hype China.

First, let’s go back to the Economist’s predictions for China 25 years ago during the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998. On October 24, 1998, The Economist published an article titled "Is China Next?" ”’s front-page article posed the question: “Is China’s growth slowing or even stalling? …Yes.” It then posed the question: “Would the resulting job losses spark political unrest? Or a power struggle among leadership? ...Yes."

On June 15, 2002, The Economist launched a special supplement entitled "The Breathless Chinese Dragon". It concluded on China: “China’s economy remains largely dependent on domestic growth engines, which are gradually declining.

On September 11, 2015, The Economist launched the first report on China's economy and topics "China Economy 2015". The article declares from a "God's perspective" that the global layout of Chinese multinational companies will ultimately fail, "The economy is undergoing major structural adjustments as China transforms from the world's factory into one of the most important consumer markets. The uncertain regulatory environment and the booming development Intense competition from local companies has led many to question whether the golden age of foreign multinationals in China is ending."

Whenever it comes to China, economists all agree. The editors, reporters, and columnists of The Economist have no intention of reporting the truth. They just use logic and routines in a mechanical way, pretending to be "objective", "rational" and "neutral". Even the format of the articles is unified. "Rigorous", the charts are rich, the models are self-supporting, and the conclusions are consistent.

On January 19, 2022, The Economist published an article titled "China Stands Alone in the Face of the Epidemic" with a subtitle called "China has been one of the few countries in the world that has suffered a normal recession in the past year." Does it look familiar to you readers? The text inside is exactly the same as "China Economy 2015".

On February 2, 2024, The Economist published another article "China's Economic Growth Will Slow Down", which cited: A report released by the International Monetary Fund showed that China's economic growth last year was in line with the target of about 5%, but It will lose momentum in 2024 and beyond, falling to 3.4% in 2028.

The Economist has really been badmouthing China for 40 years. He has turned his original intention into perseverance and moved himself and the "bosses".