San Vincenzo si racconta: prefazione

Il libro-baule e la memoria di San Vincenzo di Francesco Varanini – docente di Tecnologie dell’Informazione e letteratura presso il Corso di laurea in Informatica Umanistica, Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofie, Università di Pisa. C’era un volta il libro. Non sto mettendo in discussione l’oggetto, serie continua di fogli stampati nella stessa misura, cuciti insieme e forniti di copertina e di…

View On WordPress

«Dammi i soldi o ti ammazzo»: fruttivendolo preso a sprangate e rapinato a Bologna

«Dammi i soldi o ti ammazzo»: fruttivendolo preso a sprangate e rapinato a Bologna. I Carabinieri del Nucleo Radiomobile di Bologna hanno arrestato un 18enne per rapina aggravata. È successo alle ore 18:30 del 3 gennaio scorso, quando i Carabinieri della Squadra Operativa di Supporto del 5° Reggimento Emilia Romagna, che stava transitando in via Augusto Murri, sono stati avvicinati da un fruttivendolo, 44enne bengalese, residente in Provincia di Bologna, che riferiva di essere stato rapinato da un giovane, fuggito poi a piedi. Intercettato dai carabinieri nella vicina via Cherubino Ghirardacci, l'autore è stato identificato in un 18enne nato in Bulgaria e residente a Livorno. Una volta fermato, il ragazzo ha consegnato spontaneamente ai Carabinieri 300 euro in banconote di vario taglio, sostenendo di averle rubate in un negozio di generi alimentari. Il fruttivendolo ha riferito ai Carabinieri che il rapinatore, dopo essersi presentato nel suo negozio con la scusa di acquistare una confezione di patatine, lo aveva aggredito con un tubo di ferro, colpendolo sulla testa e urlando: «Dammi i soldi o ti ammazzo!». È stato in quel momento che la vittima, ferita e spaventata, ha consegnato 300 euro al rapinatore. Soccorso dai sanitari del 118, il titolare del negozio è stato trasportato al Pronto Soccorso del Policlinico Sant'Orsola Malpighi, dove è stato medicato alla testa. Intervenuti anche i Carabinieri del Nucleo Radiomobile di Bologna, il 18enne è stato arrestato e accompagnato presso la caserma "Luigi Varanini" di via Agucchi per ulteriori controlli. Questi hanno fatto rilevare che il ragazzo, disoccupato e collocato in una comunità di recupero, negli ultimi due anni si era reso responsabile di fatti analoghi commessi a Livorno. Su disposizione della Procura della Repubblica di Bologna, il 18enne è stato condotto nel carcere Rocco D'Amato.... #notizie #news #breakingnews #cronaca #politica #eventi #sport #moda Read the full article

Legor Cicli

Model: Wtua gravel  

Photo: Niccolo Varanini

🌈 SABATO 07 | 08 | 2021 ore 21.00 circa con la Musica di 🦩KOJO DJ🏳️‍🌈 Radio NOLO 🏳️‍🌈 Aperti dalle 17.30 alle 02.00 in Via Varanini 5 Milano 📞 Info & prenotazioni TAVOLI : 3756370393 💋 (presso Noloso) https://www.instagram.com/p/CSR9E4qsHex/?utm_medium=tumblr

Le Mura in autunno #lacasadiaida# #lacasadimichele ◦ #lucca #luccaitaly #lucca_friends #luccacity #igerslucca #luccagram #toscana #tuscany #volgolucca #conoscerelucca #volgotoscana #lucchesia #tuscanylovers #toscanagram #ig_lucca #welcome2lucca #tuscanyitaly #muradilucca #luccacomicsandgames #visittuscany#toscana_amoremio# Instagram # luccafilmfestival# Luccasummerfestival (presso Piazza Varanini) https://www.instagram.com/p/B5QRWMpK0ar/?igshid=1ex52h57aagda

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Open Beta Is Now Available For Xbox One

Content: Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Open Beta Check availability in your Xbox LIVE region

Game Description: Welcome to the Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Beta. Team up with your friends and defeat the infamous Santa Blanca Cartel. Discover the vivid and dangerous landscapes of Bolivia. Choose how you approach your targets and ultimately defeat the boss! Pre-order the game now and receive the Peruvian Connection bonus mission in our exclusive Pre-order offer. Remember that the game is still in Beta and you might experience bugs and issues, please contact us here.

Download Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Open Beta for Xbox One from the Xbox Games Store

Product Info: Developer: Ubisoft Publisher: Ubisoft Website: Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Twitter: @GhostRecon / @Ubisoft

  To read more about Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Open Beta, check out “Five Secrets for Success in the Ghost Recon Wildlands Open Beta” by Giancarlo Varanini, Senior Communications Manager at Ubisoft.

There are 3 versions of Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands available for pre-order – Standard, Deluxe and Gold. Click each link for more details or see below.

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Standard – this bundle includes Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands plus a pre-order bonus mission.

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Deluxe –  this bundle includes Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands plus a pre-order bonus mission and the deluxe pack featuring the Huntsman rifle, motorbike, 3 emblems, 3 weapon camo, 3 character customization items and an XP booster.

Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Gold – this bundle includes Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands plus a pre-order bonus mission, the deluxe pack featuring the Huntsman rifle, motorbike, 3 emblems, 3 weapon camo, 3 character customization items, an XP booster and Season Pass.

via Xbox Live's Major Nelson http://ift.tt/2mdpltX

Citing COVID, Sutter Pushes To Revisit Landmark Antitrust Settlement

Six months after agreeing to a $575 million settlement in a closely watched antitrust case filed by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Sutter Health has yet to pay a single dollar, and no operational changes have gone into effect. The nonprofit health care giant was accused of using its market dominance in Northern California to illegally drive up prices.

Late last week, lawyers for Sutter filed a motion requesting that San Francisco Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo delay approval of the settlement for an additional 90 days, due to “catastrophic” losses stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. Massullo originally was scheduled to rule on the agreement in February, but in April granted an earlier request from Sutter for a 60-day delay in the proceedings.

In court documents supporting its request, Sutter argues the pandemic has upended the financial landscape for hospitals and made numerous aspects of the agreement untenable. Last month, Sutter reported an operating loss of $404 million through April, citing declining patient revenue and expenses resulting from the pandemic. System officials said that loss took into account the more than $200 million the system received in COVID-19 relief funds from the federal government via the CARES Act.

“We’re in a crisis situation,” David C. Kiernan, a lawyer representing Sutter, told Massullo during a settlement conference earlier this month. “There are certain provisions that, if they went into effect today, would interfere with Sutter’s ability to provide coordinated and integrated care to patients in California.”

Don't Miss A Story

Subscribe to KHN’s free Weekly Edition newsletter, delivered every Friday.

Sign Up

Please confirm your email address below:

Sign Up

The settlement, announced in December, marked a dramatic turn in a long-running legal battle initiated in 2014 as a class-action lawsuit filed by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union & Employers Benefit Trust, representing employers, unions and local governments whose workers use Sutter services. Becerra’s office joined the case in 2018.

Sutter has 24 hospitals, 34 surgery centers and 5,500 physicians across Northern California, with $13 billion in operating revenue in 2019. Among other allegations, the state’s lawsuit argued Sutter has aggressively bought up hospitals and physician practices throughout the Bay Area and Northern California, and exploited that market dominance for profit.

Health care costs in Northern California, where Sutter is dominant, are 20% to 30% higher than in Southern California, even after adjusting for cost of living, according to a 2018 study from the Nicholas C. Petris Center at the University of California-Berkeley that was cited in the complaint.

In agreeing to the settlement, Sutter did not admit wrongdoing. Throughout the proceedings, it has maintained that its integrated health system offers tangible benefits for patients, including affordable rates and consistent high-quality care.

Still, under terms of the settlement, Sutter agreed to end a host of practices that Becerra alleged unfairly stifled competition. Among other conditions, the settlement requires Sutter to limit what it charges patients for out-of-network services and increase transparency by allowing insurers and employers to give patients pricing information.

Sutter Health spokesperson Amy Thoma Tan, in a statement to KHN, said the health care system “has not objected to any aspect of the settlement” but is asking whether the settlement approval process should be deferred, “given the extreme disruption to the health care industry caused by COVID-19 and the potential for COVID-19 to materially impact certain settlement terms.”

In the court papers filed last week, Sutter’s attorneys went further, arguing that the settlement “may no longer make sense in its current form and could jeopardize Sutter’s ability to continue providing care.

“In this regard, Plaintiffs’ statement that they will not reassess even a single provision of a proposed injunction negotiated prior to COVID-19 is troublesome because it ignores the potentially harmful consequences of railroading the settlement through to approval in such an uncertain time,” they continued.

The court filing notes some specific settlement terms Sutter now considers problematic. Among them is a provision that calls for Sutter to end its all-or-nothing contracting deals with payers, which demanded that an insurer that wanted to include any one of the Sutter hospitals or clinics in its network must include all of them. Also cited is a provision that would limit the size of rate increases. Sutter says in the filing that it now may need to increase prices more than expected to pay for personal protective equipment and other unanticipated costs resulting from the pandemic.

In its filing, Sutter does not specifically object to the $575 million settlement amount. But Jaime King, an associate dean at UC Hastings College of the Law who has followed the case, said the request for a delay could be a tactical strategy to support such a move.

“The longer they can delay, the more they can show they have significant losses from COVID-19, which allows them to plead for a lower settlement,” King said.

While Becerra’s office has acknowledged the difficult circumstances that the pandemic has created for California hospitals, state lawyers said the settlement is binding and should not be delayed further.

“The plaintiffs are not going to renegotiate the settlement,” Emilio Varanini, a lawyer from Becerra’s office, told Massullo last month. “It’s even more in the public interest in an era of COVID-19 that COVID-19 not be an excuse to allow anticompetitive acts that will hurt consumers.”

Richard Grossman, lead counsel for the plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit, echoed that sentiment. “Every hospital system in California is required to abide by California’s antitrust statutes, and they are all required to abide by the rules of competition that are prescribed by our legislature,” Grossman told KHN. “Sutter does not get an exception to that because there is a pandemic.”

Sutter has earned an average 43% annual profit margin over the past decade from medical treatments paid for by commercial insurers, like that provided by the plaintiff companies, according to a recent analysis by Glenn Melnick, a health care economist at the University of Southern California. “Google and Apple would be jealous of those profit margins!” Melnick said.

Without a settlement in place, critics said, Sutter can continue to employ the negotiating tactics that the attorney general called anticompetitive. Some noted, with irony, that the more than $200 million in relief funds Sutter received from the federal CARES Act was based on a formula that awarded funds according to a hospital’s prior-year revenues — meaning Sutter was compensated for a pricing system the attorney general argued was artificially inflated.

“I’d be curious if they’re trying to get in their last licks on using these types of tactics to inflate prices in one last round of negotiations with insurers and other payers,” said Anthony Wright, executive director of the advocacy group Health Access California.

Citing COVID, Sutter Pushes To Revisit Landmark Antitrust Settlement published first on https://smartdrinkingweb.weebly.com/

Citing COVID, Sutter Pushes To Revisit Landmark Antitrust Settlement

Six months after agreeing to a $575 million settlement in a closely watched antitrust case filed by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Sutter Health has yet to pay a single dollar, and no operational changes have gone into effect. The nonprofit health care giant was accused of using its market dominance in Northern California to illegally drive up prices.

Late last week, lawyers for Sutter filed a motion requesting that San Francisco Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo delay approval of the settlement for an additional 90 days, due to “catastrophic” losses stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. Massullo originally was scheduled to rule on the agreement in February, but in April granted an earlier request from Sutter for a 60-day delay in the proceedings.

In court documents supporting its request, Sutter argues the pandemic has upended the financial landscape for hospitals and made numerous aspects of the agreement untenable. Last month, Sutter reported an operating loss of $404 million through April, citing declining patient revenue and expenses resulting from the pandemic. System officials said that loss took into account the more than $200 million the system received in COVID-19 relief funds from the federal government via the CARES Act.

“We’re in a crisis situation,” David C. Kiernan, a lawyer representing Sutter, told Massullo during a settlement conference earlier this month. “There are certain provisions that, if they went into effect today, would interfere with Sutter’s ability to provide coordinated and integrated care to patients in California.”

Don't Miss A Story

Subscribe to KHN’s free Weekly Edition newsletter, delivered every Friday.

Sign Up

Please confirm your email address below:

Sign Up

The settlement, announced in December, marked a dramatic turn in a long-running legal battle initiated in 2014 as a class-action lawsuit filed by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union & Employers Benefit Trust, representing employers, unions and local governments whose workers use Sutter services. Becerra’s office joined the case in 2018.

Sutter has 24 hospitals, 34 surgery centers and 5,500 physicians across Northern California, with $13 billion in operating revenue in 2019. Among other allegations, the state’s lawsuit argued Sutter has aggressively bought up hospitals and physician practices throughout the Bay Area and Northern California, and exploited that market dominance for profit.

Health care costs in Northern California, where Sutter is dominant, are 20% to 30% higher than in Southern California, even after adjusting for cost of living, according to a 2018 study from the Nicholas C. Petris Center at the University of California-Berkeley that was cited in the complaint.

In agreeing to the settlement, Sutter did not admit wrongdoing. Throughout the proceedings, it has maintained that its integrated health system offers tangible benefits for patients, including affordable rates and consistent high-quality care.

Still, under terms of the settlement, Sutter agreed to end a host of practices that Becerra alleged unfairly stifled competition. Among other conditions, the settlement requires Sutter to limit what it charges patients for out-of-network services and increase transparency by allowing insurers and employers to give patients pricing information.

Sutter Health spokesperson Amy Thoma Tan, in a statement to KHN, said the health care system “has not objected to any aspect of the settlement” but is asking whether the settlement approval process should be deferred, “given the extreme disruption to the health care industry caused by COVID-19 and the potential for COVID-19 to materially impact certain settlement terms.”

In the court papers filed last week, Sutter’s attorneys went further, arguing that the settlement “may no longer make sense in its current form and could jeopardize Sutter’s ability to continue providing care.

“In this regard, Plaintiffs’ statement that they will not reassess even a single provision of a proposed injunction negotiated prior to COVID-19 is troublesome because it ignores the potentially harmful consequences of railroading the settlement through to approval in such an uncertain time,” they continued.

The court filing notes some specific settlement terms Sutter now considers problematic. Among them is a provision that calls for Sutter to end its all-or-nothing contracting deals with payers, which demanded that an insurer that wanted to include any one of the Sutter hospitals or clinics in its network must include all of them. Also cited is a provision that would limit the size of rate increases. Sutter says in the filing that it now may need to increase prices more than expected to pay for personal protective equipment and other unanticipated costs resulting from the pandemic.

In its filing, Sutter does not specifically object to the $575 million settlement amount. But Jaime King, an associate dean at UC Hastings College of the Law who has followed the case, said the request for a delay could be a tactical strategy to support such a move.

“The longer they can delay, the more they can show they have significant losses from COVID-19, which allows them to plead for a lower settlement,” King said.

While Becerra’s office has acknowledged the difficult circumstances that the pandemic has created for California hospitals, state lawyers said the settlement is binding and should not be delayed further.

“The plaintiffs are not going to renegotiate the settlement,” Emilio Varanini, a lawyer from Becerra’s office, told Massullo last month. “It’s even more in the public interest in an era of COVID-19 that COVID-19 not be an excuse to allow anticompetitive acts that will hurt consumers.”

Richard Grossman, lead counsel for the plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit, echoed that sentiment. “Every hospital system in California is required to abide by California’s antitrust statutes, and they are all required to abide by the rules of competition that are prescribed by our legislature,” Grossman told KHN. “Sutter does not get an exception to that because there is a pandemic.”

Sutter has earned an average 43% annual profit margin over the past decade from medical treatments paid for by commercial insurers, like that provided by the plaintiff companies, according to a recent analysis by Glenn Melnick, a health care economist at the University of Southern California. “Google and Apple would be jealous of those profit margins!” Melnick said.

Without a settlement in place, critics said, Sutter can continue to employ the negotiating tactics that the attorney general called anticompetitive. Some noted, with irony, that the more than $200 million in relief funds Sutter received from the federal CARES Act was based on a formula that awarded funds according to a hospital’s prior-year revenues — meaning Sutter was compensated for a pricing system the attorney general argued was artificially inflated.

“I’d be curious if they’re trying to get in their last licks on using these types of tactics to inflate prices in one last round of negotiations with insurers and other payers,” said Anthony Wright, executive director of the advocacy group Health Access California.

Citing COVID, Sutter Pushes To Revisit Landmark Antitrust Settlement published first on https://nootropicspowdersupplier.tumblr.com/

Citing COVID, Sutter Pushes To Revisit Landmark Antitrust Settlement

Six months after agreeing to a $575 million settlement in a closely watched antitrust case filed by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra, Sutter Health has yet to pay a single dollar, and no operational changes have gone into effect. The nonprofit health care giant was accused of using its market dominance in Northern California to illegally drive up prices.

Late last week, lawyers for Sutter filed a motion requesting that San Francisco Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo delay approval of the settlement for an additional 90 days, due to “catastrophic” losses stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. Massullo originally was scheduled to rule on the agreement in February, but in April granted an earlier request from Sutter for a 60-day delay in the proceedings.

In court documents supporting its request, Sutter argues the pandemic has upended the financial landscape for hospitals and made numerous aspects of the agreement untenable. Last month, Sutter reported an operating loss of $404 million through April, citing declining patient revenue and expenses resulting from the pandemic. System officials said that loss took into account the more than $200 million the system received in COVID-19 relief funds from the federal government via the CARES Act.

“We’re in a crisis situation,” David C. Kiernan, a lawyer representing Sutter, told Massullo during a settlement conference earlier this month. “There are certain provisions that, if they went into effect today, would interfere with Sutter’s ability to provide coordinated and integrated care to patients in California.”

Don't Miss A Story

Subscribe to KHN’s free Weekly Edition newsletter, delivered every Friday.

Sign Up

Please confirm your email address below:

Sign Up

The settlement, announced in December, marked a dramatic turn in a long-running legal battle initiated in 2014 as a class-action lawsuit filed by the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union & Employers Benefit Trust, representing employers, unions and local governments whose workers use Sutter services. Becerra’s office joined the case in 2018.

Sutter has 24 hospitals, 34 surgery centers and 5,500 physicians across Northern California, with $13 billion in operating revenue in 2019. Among other allegations, the state’s lawsuit argued Sutter has aggressively bought up hospitals and physician practices throughout the Bay Area and Northern California, and exploited that market dominance for profit.

Health care costs in Northern California, where Sutter is dominant, are 20% to 30% higher than in Southern California, even after adjusting for cost of living, according to a 2018 study from the Nicholas C. Petris Center at the University of California-Berkeley that was cited in the complaint.

In agreeing to the settlement, Sutter did not admit wrongdoing. Throughout the proceedings, it has maintained that its integrated health system offers tangible benefits for patients, including affordable rates and consistent high-quality care.

Still, under terms of the settlement, Sutter agreed to end a host of practices that Becerra alleged unfairly stifled competition. Among other conditions, the settlement requires Sutter to limit what it charges patients for out-of-network services and increase transparency by allowing insurers and employers to give patients pricing information.

Sutter Health spokesperson Amy Thoma Tan, in a statement to KHN, said the health care system “has not objected to any aspect of the settlement” but is asking whether the settlement approval process should be deferred, “given the extreme disruption to the health care industry caused by COVID-19 and the potential for COVID-19 to materially impact certain settlement terms.”

In the court papers filed last week, Sutter’s attorneys went further, arguing that the settlement “may no longer make sense in its current form and could jeopardize Sutter’s ability to continue providing care.

“In this regard, Plaintiffs’ statement that they will not reassess even a single provision of a proposed injunction negotiated prior to COVID-19 is troublesome because it ignores the potentially harmful consequences of railroading the settlement through to approval in such an uncertain time,” they continued.

The court filing notes some specific settlement terms Sutter now considers problematic. Among them is a provision that calls for Sutter to end its all-or-nothing contracting deals with payers, which demanded that an insurer that wanted to include any one of the Sutter hospitals or clinics in its network must include all of them. Also cited is a provision that would limit the size of rate increases. Sutter says in the filing that it now may need to increase prices more than expected to pay for personal protective equipment and other unanticipated costs resulting from the pandemic.

In its filing, Sutter does not specifically object to the $575 million settlement amount. But Jaime King, an associate dean at UC Hastings College of the Law who has followed the case, said the request for a delay could be a tactical strategy to support such a move.

“The longer they can delay, the more they can show they have significant losses from COVID-19, which allows them to plead for a lower settlement,” King said.

While Becerra’s office has acknowledged the difficult circumstances that the pandemic has created for California hospitals, state lawyers said the settlement is binding and should not be delayed further.

“The plaintiffs are not going to renegotiate the settlement,” Emilio Varanini, a lawyer from Becerra’s office, told Massullo last month. “It’s even more in the public interest in an era of COVID-19 that COVID-19 not be an excuse to allow anticompetitive acts that will hurt consumers.”

Richard Grossman, lead counsel for the plaintiffs in the class-action lawsuit, echoed that sentiment. “Every hospital system in California is required to abide by California’s antitrust statutes, and they are all required to abide by the rules of competition that are prescribed by our legislature,” Grossman told KHN. “Sutter does not get an exception to that because there is a pandemic.”

Sutter has earned an average 43% annual profit margin over the past decade from medical treatments paid for by commercial insurers, like that provided by the plaintiff companies, according to a recent analysis by Glenn Melnick, a health care economist at the University of Southern California. “Google and Apple would be jealous of those profit margins!” Melnick said.

Without a settlement in place, critics said, Sutter can continue to employ the negotiating tactics that the attorney general called anticompetitive. Some noted, with irony, that the more than $200 million in relief funds Sutter received from the federal CARES Act was based on a formula that awarded funds according to a hospital’s prior-year revenues — meaning Sutter was compensated for a pricing system the attorney general argued was artificially inflated.

“I’d be curious if they’re trying to get in their last licks on using these types of tactics to inflate prices in one last round of negotiations with insurers and other payers,” said Anthony Wright, executive director of the advocacy group Health Access California.

from Updates By Dina https://khn.org/news/citing-covid-sutter-pushes-to-alter-landmark-antitrust-settlement/

California Lawyers Association Gears Up For Annual Meeting In Monterey

(Image via Getty)

Hundreds of lawyers will gather in Monterey this week for the California Lawyers Association’s second “Annual Meeting,” which offers one more action-packed day of activities than the inaugural gathering.

The three-day conference starting Thursday will feature one of its premier events on day one, as California Supreme Court Justices Ming Chen and Joshua Groban will be interviewed during a luncheon.

Chin, who was appointed in 1996 by Gov. Pete Wilson, is the longest serving justice. Groban, who was Gov. Jerry Brown’s last appointee to the court, assumed his role at the start of 2019.

“We have found our attendees and members really like hearing from the California Supreme Court,” said outgoing CLA President Heather L. Rosing. “They like to understand how it works, and they like to hear the behind-the-scenes stories. I think people are also very excited to hear from Justice Groban because they don’t know him yet.”

The first day will also feature an awards ceremony and opening reception at 5:30 p.m.

“The extraordinary individuals being honored by CLA represent the very best of the legal community and we at CLA are thrilled to recognize them for their achievements,” CLA Executive Director Ona Dosunmu said in a statement.

One of the highlights Friday will be constitutional scholar and UC Berkeley School of Law Dean Erwin Chemerinsky giving the annual Alexander F. Morrison Lecture during lunch. At night, attendees can partake in a dinner reception at the Monterey Aquarium.

A swearing-in ceremony for the new leaders of the California Lawyers Association and California Judges Association is scheduled for Saturday. Emilio Varanini will serve as the new CLA President and Orange County Superior Court Judge Tam Nomoto Schumann will be the new California Judges Association president.

The officers will be sworn-in by California Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye, who let Groban handle similar duties at the recent swearing-in of the State Bar’s new leaders.

Cantil-Sakauye will be a major part of the day’s events in another way too, as she will receive the Sandra Day O’Connor Award for the Advancement of Civics Education from the National Center for State Courts.

The last night of the conference will include the California Young Lawyers Association’s “BBQ, Brews and Bocce President’s and Chair’s reception.” (During a trivia contest at last year’s CYLA reception, I was thrilled to help my team correctly answer that award-winning producer David E. Kelley went to law school at Boston University, which is where I completed my undergraduate degree.)

The California Judges Association, Bench-Bar Coalition, and Conference of California Bar Associations will also be holding their annual meetings in Monterey this week.

The State Bar hosted the yearly gathering bringing a wide variety of members of the legal community together for more than 80 years before ceding the duties to CLA, which launched last year as a result of the bar’s 16 sections and the young lawyers association being split off by the state Legislature.

CLA’s inaugural annual meeting in San Diego was a rousing success, and Rosing said they are hoping for an even-better event in year two.

Lyle Moran is a freelance writer in San Diego who handles both journalism and content writing projects. He previously reported for the Los Angeles Daily Journal, San Diego Daily Transcript, Associated Press, and Lowell Sun. He can be reached at [email protected] and found on Twitter @lylemoran.

The post California Lawyers Association Gears Up For Annual Meeting In Monterey appeared first on NEWS - EVENTS - LEGAL.

source https://dangkynhanhieusanpham.com/california-lawyers-association-gears-up-for-annual-meeting-in-monterey/

Verona: Primo itinerario turistico digitale dedicato alla storia delle signore di Verona

Verona: Primo itinerario turistico digitale dedicato alla storia delle signore di Verona. Il 3 marzo 2023, alle 15 alla sala Ruffo del Museo di Storia Naturale, in Lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, verrà presentato il nuovo itinerario turistico “Le Signore di Verona”. Si tratta di un percorso di visita originale che racconta la vita di otto donne veronesi illustri, dal periodo romano fino ai primi anni del '900. Grazie alla Web App FOODWalk, il progetto consentirà ai cittadini e ai turisti di passeggiare nelle vie del centro storico di Verona percorrendo otto tappe speciali dedicate ad altrettante donne veronesi che hanno segnato la storia cittadina. Il nuovo percorso al femminile, disponibile nella settimana dell'8 marzo in occasione della Giornata internazionale della donna, è stato illustrato dall'Assessora alla Cultura e Turismo Marta Ugolini. Il progetto si aggiunge agli altri contenuti della Web App gratuita FOODWalk, nata dalla collaborazione tra il gruppo Food Democracy, l'Università di Verona, la Fondazione CUEIM e l’agenzia di comunicazione Pensiero visibile. Il convegno, vedrà la partecipazione della ricercatrice Mareva De Frenza, dello storico medievista Gian Maria Varanini, della giornalista e autrice dei profili delle otto donne Monica Rubele, della project manager del progetto Maria Grazia Cucci e dell'imprenditore Michael Cortelletti. Le protagoniste dell'itinerario sono donne coraggiose, autonome e anticonformiste che, pur appartenendo ad epoche diverse, hanno osato diventare protagoniste del loro tempo. Fra le otto donne veronesi, vi è la matrona romana che finanziò generosamente l'acquedotto, Beatrice della Scala, detta Regina, figlia di Mastino II, che si mise alla testa di 1400 cavalieri in battaglia, Adelaide Melanotte, diva della lirica che difese un patriota durante il Risorgimento, e Silvia Curtoni Verza, intellettuale del '900 che dedicò la vita all'emancipazione femminile. Il convegno ha lo scopo di approfondire le tematiche legate al ruolo delle donne veronesi nella storia, un tema spesso trascurato dalla storiografia ufficiale. In una città raccontata più spesso attraverso uomini illustri, i relatori si confronteranno anche sul modo in cui le donne sono state raccontate dagli uomini. Al termine dell'incontro, i partecipanti potranno sperimentare una breve passeggiata guidata alla scoperta di alcune tappe dell'itinerario. L'inedito itinerario diventerà parte integrante del Food Democracy Museum, museo digitale diffuso nato dall'idea dell'imprenditore Michael Cortelletti. L'iniziativa è patrocinata dal Comune di Verona e rappresenta un nuovo modo di valorizzare e divulgare la storia delle donne.... #notizie #news #breakingnews #cronaca #politica #eventi #sport #moda Read the full article

Legor Cicli

Model: Wtua gravel  

Photo: Niccolo Varanini

A social and interactive experience Fancy a coffee? Get one for free at Martina Huynh’s Basic Income Café, which has infiltrated the osteria at Via Crespi, 14. But is it really free? “It’s a complex installation, disguised and placed in a familiar context where people know how to behave but end up talking about big issues in society," says Huynh, anticipating a social experience that needs our interaction to provoke meaning.

Headquarters at Osteria Crespi, Via Pietro Crespi, 14, 20127 Milan, with other venues along Via Pietro Crespi, Via Varanini, and Piazza Morbegno

Dates and opening times Tuesday April 17th to Saturday April 21st, 10.00–19.00. Sunday April 22nd, 10.00–18.00

www.designacademy.nl/milan

Le Mura in autunno #lacasadiaida# #lacasadimichele ◦ #lucca #luccaitaly #lucca_friends #luccacity #igerslucca #luccagram #toscana #tuscany #volgolucca #conoscerelucca #volgotoscana #lucchesia #tuscanylovers #toscanagram #ig_lucca #welcome2lucca #tuscanyitaly #muradilucca #luccacomicsandgames #visittuscany#toscana_amoremio# Instagram # luccafilmfestival# Luccasummerfestival Le Mura in autunno #lacasadiaida# #lacasadimichele ◦ #lucca #luccaitaly #lucca_friends #luccacity #igerslucca #luccagram #toscana #tuscany #volgolucca #conoscerelucca #volgotoscana #lucchesia #tuscanylovers #toscanagram #ig_lucca #welcome2lucca #tuscanyitaly #muradilucca #luccacomicsandgames #visittuscany#toscana_amoremio# Instagram # luccafilmfestival# Luccasummerfestival Le Mura in autunno #lacasadiaida# #lacasadimichele ◦ #lucca #luccaitaly #lucca_friends #luccacity #igerslucca #luccagram #toscana #tuscany #volgolucca #conoscerelucca #volgotoscana #lucchesia #tuscanylovers #toscanagram #ig_lucca #welcome2lucca #tuscanyitaly #muradilucca #luccacomicsandgames #visittuscany#toscana_amoremio# Instagram # luccafilmfestival# Luccasummerfestival Le Mura in autunno #lacasadiaida# #lacasadimichele ◦ #lucca #luccaitaly #lucca_friends #luccacity #igerslucca #luccagram #toscana #tuscany #volgolucca #conoscerelucca #volgotoscana #lucchesia #tuscanylovers #toscanagram #ig_lucca #welcome2lucca #tuscanyitaly #muradilucca #luccacomicsandgames #visittuscany#toscana_amoremio# Instagram # luccafilmfestival# Luccasummerfestival Le Mura in autunno 🍂 #lacasadiaida# #lacasadimichele ◦ #lucca #luccaitaly #lucca_friends #luccacity #igerslucca #luccagram #toscana #tuscany #volgolucca #conoscerelucca #volgotoscana #lucchesia #tuscanylovers #toscanagram #ig_lucca #welcome2lucca #tuscanyitaly #muradilucca #luccacomicsandgames #visittuscany#toscana_amoremio# Instagram # luccafilmfestival# Luccasummerfestival Le Mura in autunno (presso Piazza Varanini) https://www.instagram.com/p/B5QQgLZqRYF/?igshid=1l6i9i7nssg7d

Should I keep my 97% or play comp stage 🙃🤷🏽‍♂️?

— iBalenciaga💎 (@iBalenciaga_) Fri Dec 08 02:11:39 +0000 2017

HELL YES

— Giancarlo Varanini (@gvaranini) Fri Dec 08 02:48:22 +0000 2017