Tumgik
#Leaving Neverland Debunked
joesalw · 5 months
Note
TW: SA.
Hi. I really like your blog, but I wanted to bring something to your attention regarding a post you shared about Michael Jackson and the abuse allegations against him. I definitely agree that MJ was a victim of racism in the press coverage against him, however over the course of his life there were multiple accusations against him (from different parties) that he sexually assaulted young boys. Some of these are well documented as there were several court cases. There was a documentary about it on HBO called “Leaving Neverland” a few years ago where some of the accusers (now adults) talk about what happened and how it negatively impacted their lives. There have also been other articles and documentaries throughout the years talking about these accusations.
I guess you don’t have to believe the accusations and he was never convicted of anything (although most abusers aren’t especially rich ones). It’s just really awful for child SA survivors to see when people dismiss allegations because they say “they were in it for the money” or it was a hoax. Children often aren’t believed and the boys that accused him basically had their lives ruined by the media.
I’m bringing this up because you have been really good about (rightly) calling out Taylor and Swifties for associating with Brittany and Jackson Mahomes and calling out abuse apologists. Again, I’m not saying you have to believe the accusations against MJ if you don’t want to, but I think people need to at least take them seriously. And the post you shared really diminished them and I was disappointed in that. What that person wrote reminded me of how Swifties defend Taylor. No one wants to believe that their favorite artist could do something awful, but sometimes they do.
Hi anon, I'm sorry if this made you feel bad or uncomfortable. But honestly I don’t have enough idea and informations about the allegations against mj. This is why I myself never said a word about it. But every single allegations that i had in my inbox were debunked by that single post, so I think it's good to share to clear the confusion regarding the issue. But I will also watch the documentaries for myself to have an honest opinion about it, before that I will not discuss it further to judge who's right or wrong.
9 notes · View notes
Note
here! theres english subtitles and it basically includes all the fbi files and debunking the leaving neverland documentary as well, its not by the estate, its by a simple mj fan who wants to clear mj’s name and give him the justice he deserves
https://youtu.be/8hGF-QLsMQY
ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ
Okay, so, I’m not saying nobody should believe this, but it’s a red flag for me that it’s made by a fan and not an objective third party who doesn’t have any biases/ vested interests, etc. plus, discounting the families and survivors as a group doesn’t pass my critical thinking standards. I do think it’s on the whole true that he did commit the crimes that he was accused of. Even if maybe the little details might be debatable or the timeline of events or whatever we don’t have proof of. And those are fine to debate.
But, in order for the whole thing to debunk, I don’t think it’s okay to take the word of a fan over several other victims or their families etc. I get why someone might wanna defend their favorite artist. And I’m not saying it should de-value is work at all! I have mixed feelings about separating the art from the artist and all that. But I respect people’s right to do so. I just think, it’s healthier for everyone if we agree that, yeah, sometimes you can be an artist and a horrid human being. He was a great artist. He also molested kids. Both can be true.
0 notes
jhl1031973 · 4 years
Text
What’s On My Mind Michael Jackson Edition #1
Tumblr media
This will perhaps be my most controversial post so far. It may divide those people who follow my work. However, I feel I should express my views even if they differ from others. You may agree or disagree with me. That's your choice.
Michael Jackson passed away on June 25, 2009, eleven years-ago as of this writing. While he was an accomplished entertainer throughout his life. Fans like myself and casual observers have praised him for this. Yet, some of those people have also asked one question since 1993. Is Michael Jackson guilty of child abuse?
Now, Jackson was only human in spite of his enormous talent, but I personally believe Jackson is innocent due to inconsistencies in the accusers' stories. I've debated many of these with others over the years, Some of them are discussed much more eloquently in the videos linked below.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnP7sx4smoc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CXOfz1YkWeA&t=498s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d5Wxz7nbaN4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxNDb2PVcoM
Now, I said that the video put my thoughts more eloquently. That does not mean I won't express my thoughts on Michael Jackson's innocence. First, before I continue, go ahead and watch the videos. I'll wait.
Much of the debunking Leaving Neverland videos and articles published state the glaring error of timing of the train station incident as perhaps the one of biggest lies told in that documentary. James Safechuck stated under oath in 2014 and later in LN that he was abused in 1988-1989 in a room in the Neverland train station inspired by the one at Disneyland before said station was even built. Construction on that ended sometime in 1994, with permits approved about one year beforehand. What's worse is Oprah Winfrey, who hosted the LN aftershow, even toured Neverland in 1993. She could have said something to Safechuck and the audience, but for reasons unknown, she did not. Director Dan Reed even admits that Safechuck lied by throwing him under the bus.
Safechuck's false claims are just the tip of the iceberg. Wade Robson, in addition to his accusations, stated under oath during Jackson's 2005 trial that nothing happened. Robson also dated Michael Jackson's niece and audition for various tributes to Jackson. Now I'm going to ask some questions because some things do not make sense to me. If Jackson abused Robson, why didn't he say so at the trial? He had the perfect opportunity. Also, why on earth would Robson date Jackson's niece if Jackson did the things he claimed?
I could go on and on. However, I want to be able to check sources more thoroughly before writing about them. This is something Dan Reed failed to do. In all fairness to Reed, he is probably a good film maker. I've never seen his work aside from LN clips in the videos linked above. Yet, from what I've seen of the debunking of Leaving Neverland, he seems to be a poor researcher and fact checker. If I wrote something in BACK ISSUE without proper research and fact checks, editor Michael Eury would not permit me to write for his magazine anymore.
I believe Jordan Chandler and Gavin Arvizo also lied about Michael Jackson abusing them. If Jackson is guilty of anything, it's being too trusting of people and not learning from his mistakes. Had he at least done the latter of those two things, perhaps he wouldn't have been on trial in 2005, and perhaps he might still be alive to entertain the world.
17 notes · View notes
youtwitinmyface · 4 years
Text
Remembering Michael's Music
Remembering Michael’s Music
And by Michael, I’m of course talking about THIS GUY:
Tumblr media
Michael Joseph Jackson. The King of Pop. The biggest-selling solo artist in music history.
Last month marked 11 years since his untimely death, and I was reflecting on how his popularity remains, despite the many obstacles. Early last year when the LEAVING NEVERLANDdocumentary came out, many wondered if this would be the final nail in…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
19 notes · View notes
slashingdisneypasta · 3 years
Note
Could you do a headcanon about the villain's SO that's Asexual(someone who is disgusted by sex/doesn't want to have sexual intimacy. However, some asexual individuals partake in sex for personal reasons, like for their partner while others don't at all). How would they react? Would they even care? And I was thinking for the villains that it could be Captain Hook, Dr. Facilier, Hades, Ratigan, Beetlejuice, and maybe Bill Cipher? Thank you! I love reading these!!! Your work is so good!! 💛💜
Course! Hope you likes these! ^^ Thank youuuuu, I’m so glad you’ve enjoyed some of this blog so far! 
~~~
Beetlejuice:
Tumblr media
·         Well damn, that’s a bummer.
·         I’m sorry for him! But BJ is one hypersexual little shit. Of course, he’s not going to leave you or anything because if he just wanted sex then he’d go back to that brothel- he also likes your reactions to his horrible jokes, and your horrible jokes, and your very presence.
·         So, I mean, the ‘You’re not interested in sex’ thing is a bummer for him, but it’s not the end-all be-all of the relationship for him. Not for someone as old (And as acquainted with his right hand. Not to mention his powers) as he is.
·         If you’re still willing to have sex with him, though, be prepared to see a very ecstatic ghost!
Bill Cipher: I... kind of headcanon him as ace also? I think? I mean, he’s a triangle. He’s not disgusted by it, and he can certainly use it to his advantage, but its like ‘Yeah nah no thanks. Colossal Cosmic Power though pls?’
Captain Hook:
Tumblr media
·         I mean, even in a relationship with someone who wants and likes sex, Hook isn’t that interested in sex. He’s spent so many years on Neverland, a place that’s run by children, that sex has been put on such a backburner for so long that fantasies and desires have sort of... become… unimportant? Well, far less important than, like, getting his revenge, keeping good form, and now, you. Sex hasn’t really been a thing for him, so it’s not a big deal at all for him at all that even now that he has a partner, he won’t be having relations like that (Unless you’re okay with it. But even then- he might not be).
·         When you tell him that you’re asexual, its just like ah ‘Ah. Oh well.’ Kinda moment. He is curious about your sexual identity (Because of course he knows n o t h i n g apart from ‘Straight’, ‘Gay’, and those rare party animals’ that’ll hit ‘either’ gender. Good grief, please educate him) though so I hope you’re ready to talk about it! It might actually feel good to have someone just, genuinely curious about you. Not as a way to ‘debunk’ you identity at all- just because he’s he thinks it’s interesting.  
·         He accepts you wholeheartedly. You know, he would say, I thinks one of me pirates is like that too! Smee, maybe? Whatever, I don’t ask about the men’s personal lives.
·         You will feel completely accepted and understood on the Jolly Roger!
Dr Facilier:
Tumblr media
·         I tend to headcanon Dr Facilier as having ‘been around’, you know? Like, he’s been to all sorts of underground clubs and casinos in the French Quarter that he’s met everyone. Gays, bisexuals, men who are women on the inside, women who are men on the inside, people who throw gender to the wind entirely, couples made of more than 2 people, etc. And you are certainly not the first soul he’s met that isn’t interested in carnal relations.
·         Basically, with him, its like dating any gen z- he doesn’t care about losing out on sex! He accepts you and just wants you to feel safe and comfortable being yourself around him.
·         As long as he still gets to cuddle you (LOTS) and give you all-over-the-face kisses, (Meaning: Worship you) he’s happy XD Just lots of non-sexual affection.
·         Lots… and lots… of affection. He’s obsessed with it, really. Physical and verbal.
Hades:
Tumblr media
·         Hades is a God- the fact that asexual individuals exist is not a surprise to him in the slightest like it is with a lotta other Disney Villains. Its like ‘Righty then’ and you move on with your day.
·         Hades is not as hypersexual as his flirting may sometimes imply (He is most c e r t a i n l y not at Beetlejuice’s level, anyway)- he’s far more invested in his desires to take over Olympus and that is more at risk of destroying your relationship then the lack of sex in it.
·         If you are willing to do it with him, though, he’ll be careful and slow and will stop with ease the moment you decide you want it to stop where it is.
Professor Ratigan:
Tumblr media
·         Ratigan is a man of science- and that includes psychology, as well.
·         He quickly realises that if you two want kids and you don’t want to have sex with him to do it (If you have a functioning female reproductive system), then there’s always adoption, or other a number of other choices. Or you might not want children at all.
·         He also understands that different minds (And libidos) work differently and the fact that yours doesn’t want sex is neither a personal choice on your part, or a fault in any way. This is one of those times in Ratigans life that he realises how stupid the rest of the population is compared to his own genius criminal mind- how can anyone not understand this? Imbeciles.
·         He didn’t fall in love with your ass anyway, so no worries.
139 notes · View notes
bookwyrminspiration · 3 years
Note
I don't know if you're going to see this but I'm new to the keeper fandom (I'm a heathen that doesn't read the source material because it's expensive and it's funny having no content) but I absolutly /adore/ this account and am currently going through each post because I crave detailed analyses of different media and characters and you deliver wonderfully! I am also very interested in your wings Au but I've got so much school work and haven't got around to reading it, but what you you rate it on an agnst scale to someone who. Doesn't read angst?
Also I hate you now /I'm/ thinking about the waste management /j
But in all honesty I feel like they would leave it to the gnomes to sort it out, maybe they have a team that just shoves it in human dumps so that they can rid their hands of it and continue to thrash the humans reputation towards elves?
hello, heathen! i am going to see this! welcome to the fandom, it's always fun to have new people. honestly, fair enough about not reading the source material. not everyone has access to libraries and buying an eight and a half book series isn't always cheap--I mean, the keeper series probably cost me at lest 200 dollars in total over the several years I acquired them, and that's with owning several of them in paperback! definitely not cheap! but it can also be a lot of fun just trying to puzzle things together and knowing some of the basics but nearly none of how things work (that's how I am with bnha. my sister is really into anime right now and watches it with the whole family, but I don't really care for it and just look things up and get spoilers all the time and I love it. same with demon slayer and promised neverland)
but ahh!! thank you!! I adore you in return, nonsie. you sent this a few days ago so hopefully you enjoyed your stroll through my numerous posts about keeper! oh damn this reminded me that I need to update my character analysis masterpost. I've been meaning to do that for several days. but back to what you were saying! I love doing detailed analyses of niche aspects of these characters, so I'm glad you like reading them! I mean, i literally did a post theorizing on why Tam actually likes to wear black and once wrote several hundred words debunking a single inaccurate line from one book (Neverseen) just because it bugged me so much. so if that's up your alley, you're definitely in the right place! I simply do not know how to shut up /pos
as for the wings au: don't feel pressured to read it if you don't want to! if you stick around, you may notice me talking about it a lot, but that's just because it's a pretty big project and I like sharing it (in fact, I was working on it just before I started answering this ask), but you can absolutely interact with me and any of my content without paying attention to the wings au stuff at all. and it's pretty long, so completely understandable that you haven't gotten around to reading it! honestly don't even know if I would have time to read my own wings au...but moving on! for the angst thing, you might actually be able to find a few asks about it a little further back on my blog (I can't find it at the moment but I know it's there). one person said that as they are someone who prefers fluff, the wings au is the angstiest thing they've ever read. I don't think the au is downright bad, and there are certain things I can guarantee (like I can tell you right now none of the crew will die in this au), but there's a lot of other things that are up in the air. I can say that there is a warning before every chapter listing all the common triggers I can think to list (and if anyone has any personal triggers they are more than welcome to ask me to tag them). so even if a chapter is more dramatic than some of the others, you wouldn't be going in unprepared. i tag things like panicking, fighting, blood, mental spiraling, getting injuries, mentions of medical things, but it not much worse than what's in canon.
i think a lot of the angst comes from Sophie's introspection and attempts to understand herself and less from just reckless relationships and a desire to get hurt, if that makes sense. I guess overall I would say that it is angsty. not the angstiest thing out there, so if you've read angst maybe a 3 or 4? but if you've only read fluff before I'd knock it up to a 5 or 6. then again these are my personal opinions, and as I am someone who has read more angst my ratings are probably skewed.
so if that seems daunting you don't need to read the au if you don't want to! the only thing that would really affect your time here (if you choose to stick around! no pressure!) is that every other sunday is usually dedicated to the au, both with me posting the newest chapter and then prioritizing asks about it because it's relevant. doesn't mean i won't accept or answer other asks, just that they're usually not the first thing on my mind. so aside from that, reading or not reading the wings au shouldn't affect your ability to vibe and interact on here <33
but also like my waste management question is legit--what is their system? I've never heard Sophie mention a trash can before, so do they have them?? and then there's also the whole thing with sewers. all the houses have running water and functional bathrooms, but a lot of the houses are also in the middle of nowhere, so do they just...have their own filtration system?? or however that works? but seriously do they even create waste at all? I know they use paper, but what do they do with it?
it does feel like one of those problems the gnomes would be portrayed as being happy to solve because "the lost cities are out home" and they love helping and they don't need sleep and they're super efficient. and the elves would be very grateful and take advantage of them. idk I just think it's weird. and your idea of them dumping it into human landfills to make them seem worse fits well with the idea nilnaea brought up a few days ago about the elves not actually helping the humans with all that historical stuff, just taking the credit.
to summarize: welcome to the fandom! I'm glad you're here and flattered you like my blog! I'm here essentially all of the time, so feel free to send asks about anything and everything to do with the series and things you just like in general (I may be very kotlc focused but my propensity for talking ceaselessly does not end with this series). I hope you enjoy your time here!!
4 notes · View notes
noramoya · 3 years
Text
“Astonishing. Dorothy Byrne, Channel 4 editor-at-large and commissioning editor of ‘Leaving Neverland’, admits to Media Tribe podcast they put a bulls eye on Michael Jackson, immediately after he died. No objectivity or fairness... ‘LN’ was a premeditated ‘hit job’, a decade in the making.”
WHAT MAKES THEM EVEN BIGGER LOOSERS‼️ A DECADE PLANING SOMETHING THAT WE (MJ’S FANS) DEBUNKED IN LESS THAN 3 MONTHS❓‼️ E X C U S E US •••
1 note · View note
foxfire1989 · 5 years
Text
I watched more Youtube videos about ‘Leaving Neverland’ and I’m becoming more convinced that James Safechuck and Wade Robson have not been telling the truth. There have been accounts debunking what was told in that HBO film. Although I have been on the fence because I wanted to be open and fair since seeing it, I felt there was something suspicious going on. One thing that stood out was when one of the guy’s mothers said that she danced upon hearing the news of Jackson’s death. Safechuck and Robson did not come out with these allegations until 2013 and Jackson died in 2009. I even found it frightening to think that both men’s families would conspire with them to make up such a hideous story. Another thing that has been called out was the train station. It did not exist at the time of Safechuck’s claimed abuse. Another part that was called out was in the end where Robson was shown burning everything Michael Jackson gave to him. I ended up learning that Robson sold those items online. Just the dramatic imagery of the red jacket and white sparkly glove burning looked contrived and sensational. In footage of the two as kids, none of them seemed afraid or reluctant to be around MJ. 
In later footage of Robson as an adult, he was asked if MJ had ever touched him inappropriately and he confidently denied it, laughed it off, no skin off his knuckles. There was no seriousness or even the faintest hint of terror on his face. Just the fact that the timing of Wade’s allegations were suspicious. He was going through a tough time, was disappointed with the fact that he wasn’t making it to high celebrity status, and his wife leaving him was imminent. It is really tragic how someone could be so desperate to throw someone who has given so much to them and their family under the bus - 10 years after their passing. Just the fact that they put this out for the world to see this year - the year where a lot of attention would be focused more on Michael Jackson again because of it being 10 years without him in June - would raise suspicion. I believe these guys did extensive research on child sexual abuse and how pedophiles operate. People may argue over the “documentary” and say “but these men were showing sincere pain and were crying actual tears”. I believe they were crying because deep down inside, they knew that they were doing something very wrong. This reminded me of Casey Anthony and when her accusations of her father George molesting her as a child were broadcasted live. She was not simply faking tears to persuade people that she was a victim of childhood sexual abuse. She was weeping because she felt very guilty for betraying her father in such a way.
Accusing someone of the worst things would cause permanent damage. It leaves a black spot on their soul. I’m not 100% absolutely, positively sure that these men have been lying about what happened. However, I am very close to that point now. I would hope these men confess and apologize: “Nothing happened. We were desperate and decided to throw the most famous person of all time under the bus 10 years after his death. It was extremely wrong and I hope one day that Michael Jackson’s family, friends, and fans can forgive us.” Bottom line is that Michael Jackson was found innocent of all charges during his 2005 trial. Wade Robson was interviewed for hours upon hours to make sure that he was telling the truth. These were professional people too. Without any hesitation, Wade Robson testified and denied Michael Jackson ever being inappropriate towards him. The dinner he talked about in the documentary actually happened after he testified. I find it difficult to imagine MJ ever doing these things those men claimed. MJ has done all these amazingly kind and generous things for children and their families. I at least hope that these things are definitely not true. At the same time, it saddens me that those two people would end up ruining themselves for life like that.
24 notes · View notes
gettingtoknowmj · 5 years
Text
A WARNING TO MICHAEL JACKSON FANS - MATT FIDDLES IS A PRESS RAT AND WAS NEVER MICHAEL'S BODYGUARD
Because of my Michael Jackson page I have been afforded communication with a man formally on Michael Jackson's security team. We have talked a number of times after something on my page made him contact me. I have all proof I need that he is the real deal. He has said I can post this message, encouraged it.
Now unlike some bodyguards that hung around MJ in his last years and have made money out of their association. This guy hasn't and doesn't plan to; he doesn't even really want his face and name known but he knew Micheal for a good number of years (but not after 2004). He loved the man he called complicated, sometimes frustrating but a true good heart. He does not claim the status of friendship but keen observer of his boss, who was mostly very kind to him. He saw Michael at the best and at his worst, and felt for him. And Michael Jackson was more vulnerable than I personally imagined.
And one thing he has definitely confirmed to me is not to trust Matt Fiddles (pictured). The man popping up all over the media claiming to have been Michael's bodyguard for ten years, he is a fake and a fraud. He did not guard Michael Jackson for more than a few days back in 2002. He was an associate of Uri Geller's not Michael's bodyguard! Michael agreed to help Geller on a project. When Michael came to England this Matt Fiddles agreed free of charge for Uri Geller to pose as a bodyguard for Michael Jackson.
The things Fiddles has been saying in the press of late on the face of it seem harmless, perhaps beneficial. Yes, he is coming across as a defender of Michael Jackson's honour. He could fool anyone, including me... he did! But this guy has said nasty stuff in the past. He has a dark history of slandering Michael Jackson. That older fans are choosing not to knowledge and newer fans don't know about...
This past week since getting the alert about Matt Fiddles I and a Facebook friend of mine have attempted to warn fans on various Michael Jackson groups only to have pending posts deleted before they can be seen! It seems some group owners are keen on Matt Fiddles.
Yes, I know some of you are probably thinking "but Matt Fiddles is defending Michael Jackson. He even took apart in Chase The Truth documentary where he debunked stuff to do with Neverland... I want to believe him, it makes me feel more assured of Michael's innocence. Matt Fiddles has even said how Michael was very interested in women, and sneaked women into his hotel room! I want that to be true". I hate to break it to you, I am sorry to say but Matt Fiddles never worked at Neverland nor was he a member of his tour security.
None of Michael's real bodyguards, including the lovely man on security I have talked to remember him at all. In fact, no sneaking in of any women happened on his watch. He just saw families touring with Michael with their kids. Some of them did share and sleep in same huge hotel room at times but so did a member of security (before anybody jumps to unpleasant conclusions). If he had secret girlfriends who knows maybe he did but Matt Fiddles was not there to know. Because nobody remembers him!
Michael's makeup artist Karen Faye doesn't remember Fiddles either, don't believe me? Ask her. She is easy to contact.
Michael's friend from child to man Frank Cascio has never heard of Matt Fiddles either.
The late Frank DiLeo was asked in 2009 about Matt... and you guessed it... never heard of him.
Michael's mother has also publicly outted Matt Fiddles as a fake in the past too. Yes, Katherine Jackson, Michael's own mother: “‘Fiddes tried to pretend that he was a close friend of my son Michael, but when I spoke to Michael about him, he could not remember who he was. The whole family was deeply upset by the interviews he gave shortly after Michael’s death, which no friend would have done.’
Trust me, if Matt Fiddles was a character witness he wouldn't be called in a legal case for Michael Jackson's defence.
MATT FIDDLES LIES YOU PROBABLY WERE NOT AWARE HE CREATED IN THE PRESS
NO NOSE LIE: Matt caused some of the crazy rumours that Michael Jackson had a fake nose for years and at time of death that fell off. When anyone that has read Michael's autopsy report (not a happy task, I don't recommend it) and can see from the photos (again really upsetting, not recommend...), his nose was actually fine at time of death...
It is true that he had a number of reconstructive procedures on his nose mostly due to complications caused by lupus (and even according to security man I am in communication with, did have a hole in tip at one time caused by that!) but he did not have a full on fake nose! EVER! And as I say, issues with his nose were fixed. No fake nose.
SKIN BLEACHING AND SELF RACE HATE: Matt Fiddles claimed Michael hated his skin colour so much he almost BURNED off his willy with bleaching creams. Autopsy report, Michael had a NORMAL uncircumcised penis (I feel bad for knowing these kind of details... truly no privacy but in good cause, sorry Michael!). Certainly not brunt off by skin bleaching creams. Autopsy also showed Michael was a longtime sufferer of vitiligo. Not race hate.
NAZI SYMPATHISER: Matt Fiddles has stated that Michael Jackson was obsessed with Nazis, had admired Hitler and hated Jews. Funny that Micheal should choose a woman of Jewish faith Debbie Rowe as surrogate mother in order that he could experience becoming a father, even to please his mother's religious beliefs married Debbie so the children could be born of wedlock (something very important to Witnesses). And Michael was at one time firm friends with a Rabbi and was best man at a Jewish wedding! He even donned a skull cap for it. And Michael lovingly recounted stories of dear Rose Fine, the Jewish tutor he’d had as a child whom he credited as giving him a lifelong passion for reading.
On a related note: Matt said Michael POKED holes in a voodoo doll he made of Steven Spielberg after the singer became a Nazi sympathiser, err? Yeah... imaginative.
MICHAEL ASKED BODYGUARDS TO SHOOT RANDY: Michael Jackson ordered his bodyguards to kill his brother Randy Jackson when Randy was in a dispute with Michael. This was supposed to have been said in front of Randy. A story his real bodyguards at the time say is laughable and Randy even released a statement that it never happened.
SPERM STEALING: Matt Fiddles has claimed Michael stole his sperm to father Blanket. On 17th November 2010 Matt Fiddes sold a story claiming that in 2 months (January 2011) he will be flying out to California to take a DNA test to establish that he is the father. He never did.
"He won't go to L.A., he has no intention!" Fiddes ex-girlfriend Carly Galliford said via Twitter. "He loves the attention, not caring about the Jacksons." Galliford (who claims she was with Fiddes when he came up with the baby-daddy tale) said that Fiddes admitted to lying about being Blanket’s father to her face, years ago.
In the interest of being fair and balanced it should be noted. There are many sources that claim Michael didn't father any of his children, some more credible than others (let's not go there, his private business... wouldn't change the fact he was dad). IF Michael didn't, you can be reasonably sure Matt Fiddles didn't either. Matt Fiddes was in Michael’s life for all of 5 minutes. He wasn’t Michael's close friend, he certainly wasn’t a confidant. It's highly unlikely that Michael chose Fiddles as a donor.
KILL MYSELF WITH SAME PILLS AS MICHAEL KILLED HIMSELF WITH: On 3rd December 2010 a story appears in the Sun claiming that the stress of putting himself forward as Blanket's father caused him to take an overdose of the same drugs Michael died from and that they were found in Michael’s body. Touching story, except Michael Jackson did not die from Soma tablets, none were found in his body or in his possession, and none has ever been associated with him. The most amusing aspect of this story is that he claims he was prescribed 5 of these tablets by a Michael Jackson doctor in 2002 and he’d stored them 8 years before finally using them. Soma aka Carisoprodol has a shelf life of 2 years, so I’d be curious as to what effects a drug that had expired 6 years before could do to a person, but maybe Matt could share that with us sometime.
HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT LIE: Matt said Michael FLEW into a rage when he was barred from buying the Speaker’s chair from the House of Commons to use as his “green throne”. To quote him: "He toured Parliament in 2002 and when the guide told him he could not buy this piece of British culture Michael exclaimed, ‘I am the King, the King of Pop’, before flying into a real rage.”
Funny that, the officials that gave Micheal the tour said he was lovely, funny and charming... making a joke how he'd like a chair like that. He didn't in anyway suggest actually buying the thing let alone fly into a rage, he was even invited to go for a chat with a mp afterwards. The main tour guide said Michael loved England and was genuinely in awe of the building and history. There is footage on one of the pay for press video footage sites documenting from moment Michael starts his guided tour to moment he leaves. I will see if I can recall which site and update with link. Proof this ranting at the guide event never took place. Only thing that is true is Matt Fiddles was there.
There is actually more but you get the picture... this is just some of the crazy stuff Matt Fiddles has said, all soon after Michael Jackson died of course, so he couldn't be sued. There’s no proof he even went to visit Michael at a perminant residance. There’s no proof he even went to Neverland.
Michael Jackson is nothing more than a lucrative business for Matt Fiddles, and he is now selling his “positive” stories to papers for cash and celebrity. Nothing more nothing less. Because being positive about Michael actually is selling better for him right now as not many people are brave enough to defend Michael.... a book will come next... as you can be sure he is trying to build up a base of MJ fans to sell it too! When/if his book comes out, you will know to take what he say's with a very large pinch of salt.
---
Note: Please don't ask or pm me requesting information on the security staff member I have been in communication with. Our conversations are to remain private. Do not press me to ask him questions he has said what he has had to say, what he wanted to share and won't share no more... I may for all I know never hear from him again, if I don't that is fine, I am touched and grateful for the tip bits of information he gave me and for the warning about Matt Fiddles. I will not give his contact details to anybody. Nor repeat anything he has told me without his utter consent. Other than what has already been ok'd.
13 notes · View notes
medea10 · 4 years
Text
My Review of If It’s For My Daughter I’d Defeat the Demon Lord
Tumblr media
How…?! *stares at the title*
Am I watching one of those Isekais that are everywhere nowadays? Oh, no I’m not. Then this must be one hell of a light novel for it to have this long of a title name. Yeah, like a lot of other folks, I got intrigued by the title. Actually, my first thought was if Maes Hughes from Full Metal Alchemist died his usual death and instead of staying dead, he went to another world and must defeat a demon lord in order to go back to be with his beloved daughter. Medea…what the flying hell was that? Come on, tell me I’m not the only one who thought that! The story is about a young male named Dale who happens to be a skilled adventurer. During one of his outings, he comes across a young girl. But this young girl is not like a regular human girl. As she has horns on her head, she’s known as a devil. But one of her horns is chipped which means she committed some sort of crime. But just look at this little girl!
Tumblr media
Her only crime is looking so adorable! I mean come on, look at her. What crimes could she have possibly committed? Regardless, Dale just couldn’t leave her alone in the forest. By the looks of it, the girl’s father might have died protecting her so she’s all by herself. So Dale takes in the girl (who is named Latina). And now they’re living upstairs to a bar headed by Dale’s friends, Kenneth and Rita. Now being a sudden single parent is not going to be easy for Dale. For starters, Latina can only speak the language of devils. And secondly, what’ll happen if her devil side emerges or if certain groups find her offensive?! Well Dale is going to tackle this head on! Because for Latina, he would do anything, even defeat a demon lord! BETWEEN THE SUB AND THE DUB: As of the moment, Crunchyroll has streamed this. And seeing as this now officially has an English dub, it’s safe to say Crunchyroll has licensed it. As of today (11/24/2019), only two episodes are out. So far I have no issues with the dub. As for the sub, this is my first time listening to Latina’s seiyuu. And Dale…holy crap, this is a first in a long time! Nobuhiko Okamoto is playing someone who’s not a screaming psychopath! Here’s what you might recognize these folks from. JAPANESE CAST: *Dale is played by Nobuhiko Okamoto (known for Gladion on Pokemon SM, Accelerator on Index, Karma on Assassination Classroom, Rin on Blue Exorcist, Ryou on Food Wars, Usui on Maid-sama, and Bakugou on My Hero Academia) *Latina is played by Kanon Takao ENGLISH CAST: *Dale is played by Brandon Winckler (known for Eugeo on SAO: Alicization) *Latina is played by Ryan Bartley (known for Ram on Re:Zero, Gilda on The Promised Neverland, Mika on Love Live, Nina on Berserk 2016, and Rei on Evangelion [redub]) DISLIKED CHARACTER: Um…whoever caused Latina to be horribly depressed!
Tumblr media
We’re supposed to protect this little girl’s smile. Devil or not, Latina caused pain to nobody! She did not need to have that psycho teacher chastise her in front of her classmates and cause her to almost commit suicide.
Tumblr media
SHIPPING: I can’t say that there’s really anything ship-worthy here. I mean, there’s Latina’s classmate Rudy who seems to get all blushy around her. But they’re children, it’s cute. It almost reminds me of Hiro and Kisa from Fruits Basket. But I don’t think there’s anything else for me to mention here for…
Tumblr media
…The love of God, please don’t do this! Yeah, we see this cute father/daughter relationship between Dale and Latina that many of us fear that this sweet little relationship is going to turn into something more…and go down a rather disgusting route. Obviously, this shouldn’t be taboo. Latina is NOT Dale’s real daughter, he just merely adopted her and took her in. It’s just that after the manga ending to Usagi Drop, many folks such as myself look at Dale and Latina and think, “For the love of God Dale, do not marry your devil daughter!” And now I’m just gonna look at some spoilers to hopefully debunk that horrible image in my head that is escalating into the anime version of Woody Allen and Soon-Yi.
Tumblr media
He did it. Fuck. This cute anime is ruined. Dale x Latina. I’m a hard NO on that. ENDING: Halfway into the series, Dale and Latina go on a journey to Dale’s hometown to gather a few supplies and give Latina an opportunity to meet his parents, grandmother, and other family members. Several of the episodes, we get to see Latina at her utmost cutest hanging with doggy hybrids, wearing cute outfits, and learning many new things. After a few months away, Latina and Dale return to their home. And aside from Rita on the verge of giving birth, everything seems to be the same. Latina seems to have grown a lot during her trip. I sure hope the final episode wraps things up nicely…Eh!
Tumblr media
In the final episode, Dale is visited by another traveler (and his ex), Helmine. Up to this point, we’ve only seen her in one episode and approximately 2 seconds in the opening theme. So she must be up to no good. Actually, she wants Dale to go with her on a mission to the royal capital (which we will not see because it’s the final episode). And then we get this dilemma that Latina notices, breast-size. Because Slutty McBigTits here makes Latina feel inferior. This is why we get a pouting face from Latina for some of the episode. I do give this moment some credit as we learn a little something about Latina’s mother because up to this moment we only know something about her father figure before he died. However, Latina’s mother is only brought up because Latina feels inferior knowing her mother has a petite frame and fears she’s going to be flat as an ironing board when she grows up. And then thinks that Dale has a thing for women like Busty McFlauntsItAll. Well it all gets resolved with some cute moment between Dale and Latina. Latina will be there waiting for Dale to return and Dale will be happy as hell to just hug his sweet Latina. So Dale leaves with Titty-Titty Bang-Bang (sorry, I had to get one more out)! We then see some random moments while Dale is away including some doggy hybrids coming to visit Latina and Rita going into labor and giving birth to…I don’t know what she had, I just know her baby came out healthy and happy. And we close with Dale coming home and Latina greeting him. This anime was just…okay. When I heard about this anime, I seriously wasn’t expecting a story like this. For one thing, I thought there would be more action, particularly involving a demon lord. I mean, the words “Demon Lord” are in the title. You’d think we get something like that happening! Like in the final two episodes we learn that there’s really a demon lord out there and he was the reason why he killed Latina’s father and banished her. In fact, we only hear about demon lords once in a while and then we stuff that to the side for more cutesy moments between Dale and his adopted devil daughter.
Tumblr media
In fact, we rarely get any dramatic moments happening that much. The fourth episode however felt like a turning point in the show. And because of the dramatic moments surrounding Latina with her devil heritage, I thought there was going to be a major shift to more dramatic situations after Latina broke off her remaining horn and almost bled to death. Instead we are treated to more cutesy moments in another episode of, “My Little Demon Daughter Can’t Be This Cute”. Don’t get me wrong, there were some pretty serious moments like when Latina learns of human mortality compared to devils due to devils having twice the life-span of humans. But nothing as chilling as when a teacher called out Latina for being a devil and scaring the shit out of her.
I would say watch this anime just to see cute little devil girl, Latina. But 2019 has given us a boat-load of cute anime lolitas to fawn over like Filo and Raphtalia from Shield Hero, that fox Senko-san, and then absolute fan-favorite Nezuko from Demon Slayer. Yeah, Latina is probably bottom of that list now! For what it’s worth, it was an okay show. Not my favorite, but good to watch a cutesy devil girl. And an actual anime where Nobuhiko Okamoto is not a screaming hygena!
If you want to watch this anime, Crunchyroll has all 12 episodes available for streaming. The dub is slowly coming out Sunday mornings.
Reviews coming soon:
*Little Witch Academia
*Pokemon: Sun & Moon
They're coming. They're coming. I'm a lazy-ass. But they're still coming soon.
3 notes · View notes
werewolf-cuddles · 5 years
Note
Isnt anime for creeps?
Funny how I’m suddenly starting to get asks like this after I shared the link to a documentary debunking Leaving Neverland, isn’t it?
7 notes · View notes
emrose-gold · 5 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media
https://www.docdroid.net/8vxNFOd/facts-dont-lie-people-do.pdf
https://medium.com/@justhoughts/leaving-neverland-debunked-in-10-minutes-or-less-35d2017469ba
https://vault.fbi.gov/Michael%20Jackson
One thing I don’t really understand is why these people are so insistent on the idea that he was guilty when we provide evidence of the contrary. I thought they would at least be happy and relieved that nothing happened and nobody was harmed. Maybe I’m not supposed to understand it.
5 notes · View notes
Video
youtube
Lies of Leaving Neverland Full Movie  Debunks in 33 minutes the 4-hour #HBO smear of #MichaelJackson #LeavingNeverland. #LiesOfLeavingNeverland #MJInnocent #Justice #MJFam
1 note · View note
Text
They are now saying that all the lies that MJFam debunked, have been removed from Leaving Neverland. Keep picking it apart, until there's nothing left to this "documentary".
22 notes · View notes
daemonandjaeyde · 5 years
Text
Don't think I forgot about James Safechuck. He's been exposed too 😂☕️
And let me add to that article. This is from my notes I took on Leaving Neverland part 1....
James invited to Michael's family home in Encino California. If this was the family home, how was Michael always alone?
-Pepsi convention Hawaii. James says Michael took him there, when in actuality, they were invited to the event by Pepsi, who covered all of the expenses on the visit. Before this trip, James didn't spend a lot of time with Michael and didn't know him well, despite the claims that MJ stayed in James’ home.
-Date of Hawaii trip: newspaper article about Moliners is dated Sunday, February 14 according to Alan Light. The trip was on a weekend and lasted for 3 days. In 1988, the closest weekend to Feb 14 was Feb 12-14 (Friday-Sunday). If this is true, Michael would only have 4 days to finish up rehearsals in Florida. Feb 23 he was already performing in Kansas City on next leg of Bad tour.
-Safechuck claims, somewhere between the 4 Florida days, that he stayed with Michael in a separate house he rented there, but looking at the lawsuit, it does not support this statement. In Hawaii, his mother allegedly did not allow him into Michael’s room even when James was sick. A couple of days later, however, she allegedly okayed his separate stay in Michael’s house. And several weeks after that, during March visit to New York, she said no again to staying with Michael. This timeline is unnatural. Pictures on the internet confirm that James’ mother is the mystery woman with Michael and Jimmy in Hawaii. Her maiden name is Anderson. The name has to do with the company where her husband is working. Another photo shows James’ mother with Michael and Liza Minelli on March 11, 1988 in New York.
-Mock wedding James mentions is not true. It comes straight from ”Michael Jackson was my lover” written by Victor Gutierrez. A NAMBLA (National Man-Boy love association) member.
(Who was sued by Jackson for writing this book and it was revealed that Jordan never had a diary).
-James claims he spent a lot of time with Michael, but in his complaint, it says he spoke less frequently to him
-(01:54:26) Story James tells here is pulled straight from Gutierrez’s book. (pg. 79). In the book, it describes this happening to Brett Barnes & Jordan Chandler In Neverland. Both have come out and said it was not true.
Notes from LN part 2:
-James mentions that Michael needed him to testify. That was a lie. Since he told the police nothing happened, he was a non-entity.
-Safechuck’s mother says she danced when Michael died in 2009, but James claims he didn't realize he had been abused until 2013.
-James says Michael abused him after Michael performed at the Grammys in New York in 1989. That was a lie. The Grammy awards were in Los Angeles that year. He won an award, but didn't perform that night. The only performance from the Grammys (available on youtube) was in 1988.
16 notes · View notes