more BCS headcanons, but this time I wrote them in the time between taking a melatonin and falling asleep

Kim has a butterfly tattoo. It’s quite small and discreet enough that hardly anyone knows she actually has a tattoo in the first place. Possibly regrets it now, but again it’s small and hidden from most so maybe not? May be in her favorite color/black and white but she definitely got the tattoo during her early college years and you can’t convince me otherwise. 

After a particularly heated shouting match with Chuck at HHM, Jimmy all but sprinted down the stairs to leave the building only to trip, miss the last several stairs, and wipe out on the ground floor (the lobby was packed). He only ended up with a few bruises, but the sheer embarrassment of the situation was enough to keep him away from the office for well over a month. 

Nacho’s girlfriends have definitely painted his nails and he almost always “forgets” to take off the polish before business with the cartel (they always pick such nice colors and he can't bring himself to wipe it off). No one ever makes fun of him for it but no one compliments him, either. 

Lalo is a Modelo man through and through. There is not a single other beer he will drink, and he’s tried plenty of them. One sip of Corona (despite being a product related to Modelo) and he spit it out immediately. While at a restaurant, the waiter offered him a Bud Light with lime as their take on Mexican beer, to which Lalo only laughed and opted for water.

Said waiter hasn’t been seen in months, but Lalo swears it was because of more than just the beer, writing it off as something about “bad tableside manners.”

Pairing with his love of being out in nature, Howard is an unapologetic animal lover. He’ll strike up conversations with dog walkers on the street just for a chance to pet their dogs and has been known to greet any stray cat in downtown Albuquerque that’ll let him. There are a number of bird feeders and bat houses are scattered around his yard and, more than once, he’s picked nuts and seeds from a bag of trail mix for the squirrels that linger around HHM to prevent them from getting sick from eating old sandwiches or salads out of the trash cans. 

I love Better Call Saul I wish lawyers were real

I love better call Saul wish lawyers were real

i love better call saul i wish lawyers were real

I love hit series Better Call Saul and hit video game Ace Attorney I wish lawyers were real :(

Better Call Saul: "Sweet Liberty Tax Services"

Currently catching up on the 6th (probably final) season of Better Call Saul. I've always enjoyed the visual framing/shot composition in the series. In S6E03, Saul/Jimmy gets his marks to sign a retainer on his back. The staging is both subtle and not: Jimmy bent over, with his "clients" positioned behind him, makes for pretty clear innuendo. But like most instances of prostitution, the "john" is the real sucker, paying for something they ought to be able to get for free, and risking everything they have for something they don't really need.

Meanwhile, both Old Glory and Lady Liberty provide a backdrop to the scene, taking the form of a trailer and an inflatable roadside marker, respectively: Symbols of America's lofty ideals have been forced into cheap, trashy, and disposable forms, symbolic in their own right. The juxtaposition is not accidental. The show's creative team is no doubt aware that trailers are as American as the duplicity and metaphoric backstabbing/buttfucking in the foreground. Saul Goodman represents Americanism in all its two-faced, love-it-or-leave-it glory. Greed and initiative, corruption and ingenuity, as balanced as the scales of Justice.

Other thoughts:

• Wish I had a GIF of Inf-Lady Liberty gesticulating in the wind. Priceless... though, as a director, I have to say I hate it when a background character steals focus from the principals.

• Inf-Lady Liberty was featured prominently in Breaking Bad, atop Saul Goodman's office building in his first appearance. Looking forward to finding out how this becomes part of his mythos.

• The couple signing the retainer were part of the very first storyline of BCS Season 1, where they were introduced to the audience as kleptocraptic yuppies whose embezzlement funded their lavish lifestyle. Reintroducing them in this diminished state is a nice way to counterbalance the show's first season (where they condescendingly referred to Jimmy as "the kind of lawyer that guilty people hire" even as they tried to buy his silence and complicity) to this season, as Jimmy is on the cusp of fully assuming the Saul Goodman persona (and all the wealth/infamy/cartel connections that come with it).

• The actors playing the marks look more pear shaped/middle aged than they did in Season 1. Hollywood vanity and industry pressure to conform to a certain beauty standard being what they are, I doubt that these two actors actually put on that weight in real life; the BCS team probably gave them some padding, either to underscore the amount of time that passed since the audience last saw them, or to suggest that these two characters are still living comfortably, despite their unimpressive establishment.

The only reason I noticed how different the actors look is because the actress (Julie Ann Emery) has been "on my radar" since I first saw her in Hitch as a bubbly Southern Belle. She can still get it, even with all that padding.

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

New Post has been published on https://hititem.kr/real-lawyer-reacts-to-better-call-saul-episode-1-2/

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

Oh no what are they doing oh no oh my god oh no all right this is a ultimate illustration of typically the proof just speaks for itself that is this is awful and hilarious hi there legal eagles D James Stone right here teaching you how to think like a lawyer today we’re gonna evaluate higher call Saul episode 1 this is fairly interesting for me for the reason that I cherished Breaking bad and the persona of Saul Goodman was notably good seeing that he gave such excellent legal advice of direction it was once legal advice in the context of a drug-dealing psychopath however nonetheless good legal advice nonetheless be definite to love and subscribe to be certain that you just certainly not fail to see a future attorney reacts and of direction be certain to depart your feedback in the form of an objection i will either overrule or preserve your objections situated on their legal advantage and of direction stay except the top once I provide better call Saul episode 1 a grade for authorized realism so with out further ado let’s dig correct in – better call Saul episode 1 it is on decide would use this voice god that’s exactly what courtroom bathrooms look like they are just out of the final century they’ve obtained these bizarre push-up soap dispensers just horribly dirty k that is uh this seems beautiful accurate up to now and that’s so funny since attorneys quite do follow their opening and closing statements within the lavatory earlier than they go into court docket that is traditionally where you can in finding most trial attorneys when courtroom is set to start all proper he gave himself a pep speak oh to be 19 again k that you could never just storm in to the core of the well the area between guidance table and the decide it does look like there is a prior relationship here between the decide and Saul Goodman considering that the decide sent the bailiff into the lavatory to get him i’m guessing the choose has interacted with Saul frequently earlier than so he’s giving him some leeway however you cannot simply burst in there like that however it seems like he can have had prior permission to do that so we will keep observing k but if you are being sincere I imply fairly sincere you’ll be able to keep in mind that you additionally had an underdeveloped nineteen 12 months old brain me in my opinion I if I were held liable for one of the crucial stupid decisions I made when I used to be 19 oh wow and i bet if we have been in church correct now you get a gigantic Amen that is particularly just right what Saul Goodman is doing is he’s making himself seem personable your credibility is everything when you are in entrance of the jury so you want to make it seem like you’re a relatable man or woman you’re just an additional member of the jury so he’s doing a first-class job of seeming self-deprecating and forming an emotional connection with this jury on this what looks like a closing argument so up to now excellent which brings us to those three now these three knuckleheads and i’m sorry boys however that is what you’re they did a dumb factor that’s also particularly good if in case you have unhealthy facts you have got to get ahead of them to front run them and to exhibit that you are conscious of those bad tips however to downplay them and to exhibit that they don’t seem to be dispositive to your case so i love what he is achieved he’s simply making his own consumers appear personable they are younger they’re knuckleheads as he put it he’s making them appear relatable but in addition displaying that they have made mistake and looking to get forward of anything unhealthy tips are towards his case it’s thus far beautiful just right truth one no person obtained harm no longer a soul very most important to maintain that in intellect truth 2 now the prosecution keeps bandying this term crook trespass mr.Spenalzo the property proprietor admitted to us that he maintains most parts of his industry open to the public both day and night time so trespassing it can be little bit of a attain do you feel they’ve oh man I particularly like this as good maintain in mind that a trial can go on for days and generally weeks so there are thousands if now not 1000’s of tips dozens of people testifying a trial is an awfully difficult factor so what Saul Goodman has carried out right here is reminded the jury of two and simplest two information in view that a trial is quite relatively tricky and he just wishes them to focal point on two matters which might be primarily good for his case so he elements out that nobody got damage which is also foremost from a legal point of view in that probably the most elements of something crime they may be being charged with could also be triggered by using bodily harm but extra importantly it indicates on an emotional degree that there’s no need for the jury to punish these boys for the reason that nobody was harm so it dovetails on the emotional and then the 2d thing that he specializes in is the authorized requirement for crook trespass now not being made if the property owner offers consent to any individual getting into their property then these boys can not be guilty of the crime of criminal trespass so he is specializing in the one hand on the emotional set off that nobody was once damage and also on the legal trigger that the detail of crook trespass is not met so out of all of the matters that the jury learned in trial he specializes in these two salient features which might be both good for his case and i consider that that is a very smart way of going about your closing argument here’s what i do know these three young guys near honors pupils all clear honors feliz erodes one Saturday night time and they just a little bananas I don’t know call me loopy but i don’t consider they should have their brilliant Futures ruined by means of a momentary minut not ever to be repeated lapse of judgment an additional excellent emotion Lemoine you are bigger than that that is particularly just right there are two rhetorical contraptions that Saul Goodman is utilising here to first-class outcomes the first is that he’s referring to the dramaturgical so he’s putting the jury up on a stage showing them that men and women are observing and quantity two he’s ascribing the values that he wants to the jury he’s pronouncing that they are better than that hoping that they’ll rise to the attribute that he’s already ascribed to them so these are two killer persuasive approaches that Saul Goodman has used right here oh god what have they completed oh no he’s just gonna show a video so on account that that is closing argument all of the evidence has already are available so the prosecutor would not ought to lay any basis all of that has already been centered for the duration of the course of the trial and the decide has already accepted or denied the entire reveals together with god most effective is aware of what is going on to be on this videotape oh no oh my god oh no all right this can be a superb illustration of often the evidence simply speaks for itself in Latin that is the phrase race if loquitur the article speaks for itself and albeit commonly it doesn’t require any authorized argument you simply show the article itself and that is bad sufficient usually you do not must gild the lily or pound the rubble it can be just unhealthy adequate as it’s and if I used to be the prosecutor on this precise case I typically would have carried out the equal factor simply exhibit the tape let it speaks for itself and let the jury come to a decision this does not need any argument at all that is this is terrible aunt hilarious how type of math is that seven hundred per security no no defendant dint three defendants 2,a hundred which incidentally cut price what I did for them they going to detention center Langer sausage what does that subject so i assume in this case Saul is a public defender as you may know there are two varieties of government attorneys in this context there are the prosecutors who’re employed through the state to absolutely prosecute those alleged of crimes and then there are also public defenders who furnish a safety to those that cannot manage to pay for one it goes again to the Nineteen Sixties to a Supreme court case called Gideon versus Wainwright which held that below the sixth amendments defense to a trial defendants were required to have an legal professional on the grounds that in the event that they did not have an lawyer the correct to an impartial trial would certainly not be upheld due to the fact it could be inherently unfair so under Supreme courtroom precedent should you cannot have enough money an legal professional you are offered a public defender now that most effective applies in the crook context it does not apply within the civil context if you are sued civilly you are clearly in your possess and that’s the place attorneys like me a civil lawyer are available and we retailer your publisher 1st baron verulam that you can tell me what this twenty six thousand purported to be for that’s cash for Chuck is not that what you desired a measly 26 grand Jesus you are like Peter Minuit with the Indians throw in some beads and shells even as you are at it it’s only a start there’ll be extra until you are gonna just tear all of them up and why was it made out to me why now not Chuck so he in my opinion informed you that it can be his wish to withdraw from the organization see that will surprise me it’s been close to a yr considering he set foot in here k so one of the vital factors that Jimmy won’t need to money this assess or have his purchaser cash this examine is that there’s a doctrine in most jurisdictions that says that despite the fact that you wouldn’t have a written contract an express contract that is spelled out and has all of the phrases that you would be able to mostly enter into a contract by means of your conduct so I suppose he’s worried about the concept that if he cashes this examine he may tacitly comply with the terms of this settlement with this other regulation company and for this reason provide them the deal that they need which isn’t a deal that Jimmy or his purchaser wishes so I believe he’s involved about forming a agreement contract by using his own habits however i suppose we are going to see six hundred thirty bucks is that for one fall to two falls in in the future even at your age that is gotta hurt authentic that proper well I received a job for you that’s two grand sounding too grand for one hit one hit plus you get to be taught from the pleasant k I commonly do not must tell you how unethical it is for an attorney to move out and pay men and women to fake an damage and truly defraud some negative victim however let’s talk about one of the crucial nuances right here in the event that they had been to head forward with this plan they might be carrying out fraud and would be responsible for civil and probably criminal fraud now on top of that they would now not be in a position to get compensation for something accidents that they have of path fraud creates an affirmative security to the sort of allegations that they might wish to create however extra fundamentally they lack what’s known as standing in the usprocedure in order to go forward with a civil fit your needs have got to have standing you ought to exhibit that you have suffered an injury and while you deliberately have interaction on this type of habits you negate the style of staining that would provide upward push to an harm so not simplest will they no longer be able to get compensation for the reason that they have defrauded any one however in addition they lack the underlying factors of the the civil go well with that lacks standing and so they lack in actionable harm so if they ever get caught this is not a excellent thing for them all right ok that used to be the primary episode of higher name Saul and it did not disappoint I rather look forward to reviewing future episodes of this sequence it can be satisfactory but now it is time to give better name Saul a grade for legal realism so let’s believe about this good now we have sensible depictions of the monotony of courtroom life we have now some rather just right arguments being made looking to attraction to the jury’s emotional state we now have significant firm attorneys being jerks we have now the unglamorous lifetime of an legal professional who is simply trying to make ends meet and we now have literal ambulance chasers who’re throwing themselves in entrance of automobiles all in all we have now a practical depiction of numerous the parts that go into a lawyer’s lifestyles that rarely get any monitor time with simplest minimal dramatic license so i’m giving better call Saul episode 1 and a – for authorized realism good finished so hit that belt to be notified of my subsequent reaction and examine out this playlist I put together that entails all of my prior reactions together with my response to suits the good spouse and lots of others so click on on that playlist and i will see you in courtroom

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

New Post has been published on https://hititem.kr/real-lawyer-reacts-to-better-call-saul-episode-1-2/

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

Oh no what are they doing oh no oh my god oh no all right this is a ultimate illustration of typically the proof just speaks for itself that is this is awful and hilarious hi there legal eagles D James Stone right here teaching you how to think like a lawyer today we’re gonna evaluate higher call Saul episode 1 this is fairly interesting for me for the reason that I cherished Breaking bad and the persona of Saul Goodman was notably good seeing that he gave such excellent legal advice of direction it was once legal advice in the context of a drug-dealing psychopath however nonetheless good legal advice nonetheless be definite to love and subscribe to be certain that you just certainly not fail to see a future attorney reacts and of direction be certain to depart your feedback in the form of an objection i will either overrule or preserve your objections situated on their legal advantage and of direction stay except the top once I provide better call Saul episode 1 a grade for authorized realism so with out further ado let’s dig correct in – better call Saul episode 1 it is on decide would use this voice god that’s exactly what courtroom bathrooms look like they are just out of the final century they’ve obtained these bizarre push-up soap dispensers just horribly dirty k that is uh this seems beautiful accurate up to now and that’s so funny since attorneys quite do follow their opening and closing statements within the lavatory earlier than they go into court docket that is traditionally where you can in finding most trial attorneys when courtroom is set to start all proper he gave himself a pep speak oh to be 19 again k that you could never just storm in to the core of the well the area between guidance table and the decide it does look like there is a prior relationship here between the decide and Saul Goodman considering that the decide sent the bailiff into the lavatory to get him i’m guessing the choose has interacted with Saul frequently earlier than so he’s giving him some leeway however you cannot simply burst in there like that however it seems like he can have had prior permission to do that so we will keep observing k but if you are being sincere I imply fairly sincere you’ll be able to keep in mind that you additionally had an underdeveloped nineteen 12 months old brain me in my opinion I if I were held liable for one of the crucial stupid decisions I made when I used to be 19 oh wow and i bet if we have been in church correct now you get a gigantic Amen that is particularly just right what Saul Goodman is doing is he’s making himself seem personable your credibility is everything when you are in entrance of the jury so you want to make it seem like you’re a relatable man or woman you’re just an additional member of the jury so he’s doing a first-class job of seeming self-deprecating and forming an emotional connection with this jury on this what looks like a closing argument so up to now excellent which brings us to those three now these three knuckleheads and i’m sorry boys however that is what you’re they did a dumb factor that’s also particularly good if in case you have unhealthy facts you have got to get ahead of them to front run them and to exhibit that you are conscious of those bad tips however to downplay them and to exhibit that they don’t seem to be dispositive to your case so i love what he is achieved he’s simply making his own consumers appear personable they are younger they’re knuckleheads as he put it he’s making them appear relatable but in addition displaying that they have made mistake and looking to get forward of anything unhealthy tips are towards his case it’s thus far beautiful just right truth one no person obtained harm no longer a soul very most important to maintain that in intellect truth 2 now the prosecution keeps bandying this term crook trespass mr.Spenalzo the property proprietor admitted to us that he maintains most parts of his industry open to the public both day and night time so trespassing it can be little bit of a attain do you feel they’ve oh man I particularly like this as good maintain in mind that a trial can go on for days and generally weeks so there are thousands if now not 1000’s of tips dozens of people testifying a trial is an awfully difficult factor so what Saul Goodman has carried out right here is reminded the jury of two and simplest two information in view that a trial is quite relatively tricky and he just wishes them to focal point on two matters which might be primarily good for his case so he elements out that nobody got damage which is also foremost from a legal point of view in that probably the most elements of something crime they may be being charged with could also be triggered by using bodily harm but extra importantly it indicates on an emotional degree that there’s no need for the jury to punish these boys for the reason that nobody was harm so it dovetails on the emotional and then the 2d thing that he specializes in is the authorized requirement for crook trespass now not being made if the property owner offers consent to any individual getting into their property then these boys can not be guilty of the crime of criminal trespass so he is specializing in the one hand on the emotional set off that nobody was once damage and also on the legal trigger that the detail of crook trespass is not met so out of all of the matters that the jury learned in trial he specializes in these two salient features which might be both good for his case and i consider that that is a very smart way of going about your closing argument here’s what i do know these three young guys near honors pupils all clear honors feliz erodes one Saturday night time and they just a little bananas I don’t know call me loopy but i don’t consider they should have their brilliant Futures ruined by means of a momentary minut not ever to be repeated lapse of judgment an additional excellent emotion Lemoine you are bigger than that that is particularly just right there are two rhetorical contraptions that Saul Goodman is utilising here to first-class outcomes the first is that he’s referring to the dramaturgical so he’s putting the jury up on a stage showing them that men and women are observing and quantity two he’s ascribing the values that he wants to the jury he’s pronouncing that they are better than that hoping that they’ll rise to the attribute that he’s already ascribed to them so these are two killer persuasive approaches that Saul Goodman has used right here oh god what have they completed oh no he’s just gonna show a video so on account that that is closing argument all of the evidence has already are available so the prosecutor would not ought to lay any basis all of that has already been centered for the duration of the course of the trial and the decide has already accepted or denied the entire reveals together with god most effective is aware of what is going on to be on this videotape oh no oh my god oh no all right this can be a superb illustration of often the evidence simply speaks for itself in Latin that is the phrase race if loquitur the article speaks for itself and albeit commonly it doesn’t require any authorized argument you simply show the article itself and that is bad sufficient usually you do not must gild the lily or pound the rubble it can be just unhealthy adequate as it’s and if I used to be the prosecutor on this precise case I typically would have carried out the equal factor simply exhibit the tape let it speaks for itself and let the jury come to a decision this does not need any argument at all that is this is terrible aunt hilarious how type of math is that seven hundred per security no no defendant dint three defendants 2,a hundred which incidentally cut price what I did for them they going to detention center Langer sausage what does that subject so i assume in this case Saul is a public defender as you may know there are two varieties of government attorneys in this context there are the prosecutors who’re employed through the state to absolutely prosecute those alleged of crimes and then there are also public defenders who furnish a safety to those that cannot manage to pay for one it goes again to the Nineteen Sixties to a Supreme court case called Gideon versus Wainwright which held that below the sixth amendments defense to a trial defendants were required to have an legal professional on the grounds that in the event that they did not have an lawyer the correct to an impartial trial would certainly not be upheld due to the fact it could be inherently unfair so under Supreme courtroom precedent should you cannot have enough money an legal professional you are offered a public defender now that most effective applies in the crook context it does not apply within the civil context if you are sued civilly you are clearly in your possess and that’s the place attorneys like me a civil lawyer are available and we retailer your publisher 1st baron verulam that you can tell me what this twenty six thousand purported to be for that’s cash for Chuck is not that what you desired a measly 26 grand Jesus you are like Peter Minuit with the Indians throw in some beads and shells even as you are at it it’s only a start there’ll be extra until you are gonna just tear all of them up and why was it made out to me why now not Chuck so he in my opinion informed you that it can be his wish to withdraw from the organization see that will surprise me it’s been close to a yr considering he set foot in here k so one of the vital factors that Jimmy won’t need to money this assess or have his purchaser cash this examine is that there’s a doctrine in most jurisdictions that says that despite the fact that you wouldn’t have a written contract an express contract that is spelled out and has all of the phrases that you would be able to mostly enter into a contract by means of your conduct so I suppose he’s worried about the concept that if he cashes this examine he may tacitly comply with the terms of this settlement with this other regulation company and for this reason provide them the deal that they need which isn’t a deal that Jimmy or his purchaser wishes so I believe he’s involved about forming a agreement contract by using his own habits however i suppose we are going to see six hundred thirty bucks is that for one fall to two falls in in the future even at your age that is gotta hurt authentic that proper well I received a job for you that’s two grand sounding too grand for one hit one hit plus you get to be taught from the pleasant k I commonly do not must tell you how unethical it is for an attorney to move out and pay men and women to fake an damage and truly defraud some negative victim however let’s talk about one of the crucial nuances right here in the event that they had been to head forward with this plan they might be carrying out fraud and would be responsible for civil and probably criminal fraud now on top of that they would now not be in a position to get compensation for something accidents that they have of path fraud creates an affirmative security to the sort of allegations that they might wish to create however extra fundamentally they lack what’s known as standing in the usprocedure in order to go forward with a civil fit your needs have got to have standing you ought to exhibit that you have suffered an injury and while you deliberately have interaction on this type of habits you negate the style of staining that would provide upward push to an harm so not simplest will they no longer be able to get compensation for the reason that they have defrauded any one however in addition they lack the underlying factors of the the civil go well with that lacks standing and so they lack in actionable harm so if they ever get caught this is not a excellent thing for them all right ok that used to be the primary episode of higher name Saul and it did not disappoint I rather look forward to reviewing future episodes of this sequence it can be satisfactory but now it is time to give better name Saul a grade for legal realism so let’s believe about this good now we have sensible depictions of the monotony of courtroom life we have now some rather just right arguments being made looking to attraction to the jury’s emotional state we now have significant firm attorneys being jerks we have now the unglamorous lifetime of an legal professional who is simply trying to make ends meet and we now have literal ambulance chasers who’re throwing themselves in entrance of automobiles all in all we have now a practical depiction of numerous the parts that go into a lawyer’s lifestyles that rarely get any monitor time with simplest minimal dramatic license so i’m giving better call Saul episode 1 and a – for authorized realism good finished so hit that belt to be notified of my subsequent reaction and examine out this playlist I put together that entails all of my prior reactions together with my response to suits the good spouse and lots of others so click on on that playlist and i will see you in courtroom

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

New Post has been published on https://hititem.kr/real-lawyer-reacts-to-better-call-saul-episode-1-4/

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

Oh no what are they doing oh no oh my god oh no all right this can be a best illustration of routinely the proof just speaks for itself this is that is terrible and hilarious hey legal eagles D James Stone here educating you how to feel like a legal professional in these days we’re gonna overview better name Saul episode 1 this is fairly exciting for me given that I cherished Breaking unhealthy and the character of Saul Goodman used to be mainly just right considering he gave such excellent authorized advice of path it was authorized advice within the context of a drug-dealing psychopath but nonetheless good authorized advice nevertheless be sure to love and subscribe to ensure that you in no way fail to spot a future lawyer reacts and of path be sure to leave your feedback within the type of an objection i’ll either overrule or preserve your objections established on their legal benefit and of course stay except the end when I supply better name Saul episode 1 a grade for legal realism so without further ado let’s dig proper in – better name Saul episode 1 it can be on decide would use this voice god that’s precisely what court docket toilets appear like they are just out of the final century they’ve obtained those weird push-up soap dispensers just horribly dirty ok that is uh this seems beautiful correct so far and that is so funny because lawyers rather do follow their opening and closing statements within the bathroom before they go into court that’s on the whole where you can find most trial attorneys when court is set to start all proper he gave himself a pep talk oh to be 19 again k which you could under no circumstances just storm in to the core of the well the field between assistance table and the choose it does seem like there is a prior relationship here between the decide and Saul Goodman since the judge sent the bailiff into the bathroom to get him i’m guessing the choose has interacted with Saul generally before so he is giving him some leeway however you can not just burst in there like that but it looks as if he can have had prior permission to do that so we will keep looking at ok but if you are being sincere I mean really honest you’ll be able to don’t forget that you just additionally had an underdeveloped nineteen 12 months historic mind me personally I if I were held responsible for one of the vital stupid decisions I made after I used to be 19 oh wow and that i wager if we were in church correct now you get a enormous Amen that is particularly excellent what Saul Goodman is doing is he’s making himself look personable your credibility is the whole lot when you’re in front of the jury so you wish to have to make it look like you’re a relatable individual you are simply one other member of the jury so he is doing a nice job of seeming self-deprecating and forming an emotional reference to this jury on this what appears like a closing argument so up to now superb which brings us to those three now these three knuckleheads and i’m sorry boys however that’s what you might be they did a dumb factor that is also really just right you probably have unhealthy data you have to get forward of them to entrance run them and to exhibit that you are aware of these dangerous tips but to downplay them and to show that they aren’t dispositive to your case so i love what he’s accomplished he’s truly making his own customers seem personable they’re younger they’re knuckleheads as he put it he is making them seem relatable but also showing that they have made mistake and looking to get ahead of anything dangerous information are in opposition to his case it’s to this point beautiful just right reality one no person obtained damage now not a soul very principal to keep that in intellect truth 2 now the prosecution keeps bandying this time period criminal trespass mr.Spenalzo the property owner admitted to us that he maintains most parts of his industry open to the general public both day and night so trespassing it is little bit of a reach do you suppose they’ve oh man I particularly like this as good preserve in mind that a trial can go on for days and typically weeks so there are countless numbers if not 1000s of details dozens of individuals testifying a trial is an extraordinarily complex thing so what Saul Goodman has completed here is reminded the jury of two and most effective two info seeing that a trial is particularly rather tricky and he just wishes them to focal point on two matters which might be specifically just right for his case so he aspects out that no one bought damage which could also be essential from a legal viewpoint in that probably the most factors of anything crime they’re being charged with is also triggered via bodily harm however extra importantly it shows on an emotional stage that there is no need for the jury to punish these boys due to the fact nobody used to be harm so it dovetails on the emotional after which the 2d factor that he makes a speciality of is the authorized requirement for criminal trespass not being made if the property owner offers consent to any individual entering their property then these boys can’t be responsible of the crime of crook trespass so he is specializing in the one hand on the emotional set off that no person used to be damage and in addition on the authorized set off that the aspect of criminal trespass is not met so out of the entire matters that the jury realized in trial he makes a speciality of these two salient aspects which might be both just right for his case and that i consider that that is a very smart way of going about your closing argument here’s what i know these three young men near honors scholars all clear honors feliz erodes one Saturday night they usually just a bit bananas I have no idea call me loopy however i do not think they need to have their brilliant Futures ruined with the aid of a temporary minut in no way to be repeated lapse of judgment yet another excellent emotion Lemoine you’re larger than that that’s particularly good there are two rhetorical devices that Saul Goodman is making use of right here to nice outcomes the primary is that he’s referring to the dramaturgical so he is placing the jury up on a stage displaying them that humans are observing and quantity two he is ascribing the values that he wants to the jury he’s announcing that they are bigger than that hoping that they will upward push to the attribute that he’s already ascribed to them so these are two killer persuasive tactics that Saul Goodman has used here oh god what have they carried out oh no he’s simply gonna exhibit a video so on account that this is closing argument all the evidence has already are available so the prosecutor does not have to lay any foundation all of that has already been based for the duration of the direction of the trial and the choose has already authorised or denied the entire reveals including god simplest is aware of what’s going to be on this videotape oh no oh my god oh no all correct this can be a perfect illustration of typically the evidence just speaks for itself in Latin that is the phrase race if loquitur the thing speaks for itself and admittedly in many instances it does not require any legal argument you simply show the item itself and that’s dangerous sufficient routinely you do not have got to gild the lily or pound the rubble it is just unhealthy ample as it’s and if I was once the prosecutor on this exact case I on the whole would have completed the same thing just show the tape let it speaks for itself and let the jury decide this does not need any argument in any respect this is this is awful aunt hilarious how type of math is that seven-hundred per defense no no defendant dint three defendants 2,a hundred which by the way bargain what I did for them they going to reformatory Langer sausage what does that subject so i assume on this case Saul is a public defender as you can also understand there are two types of government attorneys on this context there are the prosecutors who are employed through the state to definitely prosecute these alleged of crimes and then there are also public defenders who provide a safeguard to people who can not afford one it goes back to the Nineteen Sixties to a Supreme court case referred to as Gideon versus Wainwright which held that below the sixth amendments safety to a trial defendants were required to have an attorney since if they didn’t have an legal professional the right to an impartial trial would under no circumstances be upheld considering it would be inherently unfair so under Supreme courtroom precedent for those who cannot have the funds for an attorney you are provided a public defender now that handiest applies in the crook context it does now not follow within the civil context in case you are sued civilly you’re basically to your own and that is the place attorneys like me a civil lawyer are available and we store your Baron Verulam that you would be able to tell me what this twenty six thousand purported to be for that’s cash for Chuck is not that what you wanted a measly 26 grand Jesus you’re like Peter Minuit with the Indians throw in some beads and shells at the same time you’re at it it can be only a start there will be more until you are gonna simply tear them all up and why was it made out to me why now not Chuck so he personally advised you that it can be his wish to withdraw from the company see that may shock me it can be been virtually a yr on the grounds that he set foot in here okay so one of the reasons that Jimmy would possibly not need to cash this investigate or have his patron cash this assess is that there is a doctrine in most jurisdictions that claims that even supposing you should not have a written contract an categorical contract that’s spelled out and has the entire phrases that you would be able to repeatedly enter into a contract by way of your behavior so I suppose he’s concerned concerning the suggestion that if he cashes this assess he could tacitly agree to the terms of this agreement with this other regulation corporation and thus give them the deal that they need which isn’t a deal that Jimmy or his customer wants so I feel he is involved about forming a contract contract by his own habits but i guess we will see 600 thirty bucks is that for one fall to 2 falls in sooner or later even at your age that is gotta damage actual that correct well I got a job for you that is two grand sounding too grand for one hit one hit plus you get to gain knowledge of from the first-class ok I usually don’t must inform you how unethical it is for an legal professional to go out and pay individuals to fake an harm and clearly defraud some terrible victim but let’s speak about one of the crucial nuances right here in the event that they were to head ahead with this plan they’d be conducting fraud and could be accountable for civil and probably criminal fraud now on high of that they’d not be competent to get compensation for anything accidents that they’ve of course fraud creates an affirmative security to the variety of allegations that they would want to create however extra fundamentally they lack what’s called standing in the united statessystem so as to go forward with a civil fit you must have standing you ought to show that you have suffered an damage and while you deliberately interact on this variety of conduct you negate the variety of staining that would provide rise to an harm so no longer most effective will they no longer be in a position to get compensation since they’ve defrauded anyone however they also lack the underlying factors of the the civil suit that lacks standing they usually lack in actionable harm so if they ever get caught this isn’t a excellent factor for all of them correct ok that was once the first episode of better name Saul and it didn’t disappoint I rather seem ahead to reviewing future episodes of this sequence it can be pleasant but now it is time to give higher call Saul a grade for legal realism so let’s suppose about this well we’ve practical depictions of the monotony of courtroom existence we now have some fairly good arguments being made looking to appeal to the jury’s emotional state we now have giant corporation attorneys being jerks we now have the unglamorous lifetime of an attorney who is solely looking to make ends meet and we’ve literal ambulance chasers who are throwing themselves in entrance of automobiles all in all we have a practical depiction of a variety of the components that go into a attorney’s lifestyles that not often get any reveal time with most effective minimal dramatic license so i am giving better name Saul episode 1 and a – for authorized realism well carried out so hit that belt to be notified of my next reaction and verify out this playlist I put collectively that entails all of my prior reactions including my response to suits the great spouse and lots of others so click on on that playlist and i’m going to see you in court docket

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

New Post has been published on https://hititem.kr/real-lawyer-reacts-to-better-call-saul-episode-1-4/

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

Oh no what are they doing oh no oh my god oh no all right this can be a best illustration of routinely the proof just speaks for itself this is that is terrible and hilarious hey legal eagles D James Stone here educating you how to feel like a legal professional in these days we’re gonna overview better name Saul episode 1 this is fairly exciting for me given that I cherished Breaking unhealthy and the character of Saul Goodman used to be mainly just right considering he gave such excellent authorized advice of path it was authorized advice within the context of a drug-dealing psychopath but nonetheless good authorized advice nevertheless be sure to love and subscribe to ensure that you in no way fail to spot a future lawyer reacts and of path be sure to leave your feedback within the type of an objection i’ll either overrule or preserve your objections established on their legal benefit and of course stay except the end when I supply better name Saul episode 1 a grade for legal realism so without further ado let’s dig proper in – better name Saul episode 1 it can be on decide would use this voice god that’s precisely what court docket toilets appear like they are just out of the final century they’ve obtained those weird push-up soap dispensers just horribly dirty ok that is uh this seems beautiful correct so far and that is so funny because lawyers rather do follow their opening and closing statements within the bathroom before they go into court that’s on the whole where you can find most trial attorneys when court is set to start all proper he gave himself a pep talk oh to be 19 again k which you could under no circumstances just storm in to the core of the well the field between assistance table and the choose it does seem like there is a prior relationship here between the decide and Saul Goodman since the judge sent the bailiff into the bathroom to get him i’m guessing the choose has interacted with Saul generally before so he is giving him some leeway however you can not just burst in there like that but it looks as if he can have had prior permission to do that so we will keep looking at ok but if you are being sincere I mean really honest you’ll be able to don’t forget that you just additionally had an underdeveloped nineteen 12 months historic mind me personally I if I were held responsible for one of the vital stupid decisions I made after I used to be 19 oh wow and that i wager if we were in church correct now you get a enormous Amen that is particularly excellent what Saul Goodman is doing is he’s making himself look personable your credibility is the whole lot when you’re in front of the jury so you wish to have to make it look like you’re a relatable individual you are simply one other member of the jury so he is doing a nice job of seeming self-deprecating and forming an emotional reference to this jury on this what appears like a closing argument so up to now superb which brings us to those three now these three knuckleheads and i’m sorry boys however that’s what you might be they did a dumb factor that is also really just right you probably have unhealthy data you have to get forward of them to entrance run them and to exhibit that you are aware of these dangerous tips but to downplay them and to show that they aren’t dispositive to your case so i love what he’s accomplished he’s truly making his own customers seem personable they’re younger they’re knuckleheads as he put it he is making them seem relatable but also showing that they have made mistake and looking to get ahead of anything dangerous information are in opposition to his case it’s to this point beautiful just right reality one no person obtained damage now not a soul very principal to keep that in intellect truth 2 now the prosecution keeps bandying this time period criminal trespass mr.Spenalzo the property owner admitted to us that he maintains most parts of his industry open to the general public both day and night so trespassing it is little bit of a reach do you suppose they’ve oh man I particularly like this as good preserve in mind that a trial can go on for days and typically weeks so there are countless numbers if not 1000s of details dozens of individuals testifying a trial is an extraordinarily complex thing so what Saul Goodman has completed here is reminded the jury of two and most effective two info seeing that a trial is particularly rather tricky and he just wishes them to focal point on two matters which might be specifically just right for his case so he aspects out that no one bought damage which could also be essential from a legal viewpoint in that probably the most factors of anything crime they’re being charged with is also triggered via bodily harm however extra importantly it shows on an emotional stage that there is no need for the jury to punish these boys due to the fact nobody used to be harm so it dovetails on the emotional after which the 2d factor that he makes a speciality of is the authorized requirement for criminal trespass not being made if the property owner offers consent to any individual entering their property then these boys can’t be responsible of the crime of crook trespass so he is specializing in the one hand on the emotional set off that no person used to be damage and in addition on the authorized set off that the aspect of criminal trespass is not met so out of the entire matters that the jury realized in trial he makes a speciality of these two salient aspects which might be both just right for his case and that i consider that that is a very smart way of going about your closing argument here’s what i know these three young men near honors scholars all clear honors feliz erodes one Saturday night they usually just a bit bananas I have no idea call me loopy however i do not think they need to have their brilliant Futures ruined with the aid of a temporary minut in no way to be repeated lapse of judgment yet another excellent emotion Lemoine you’re larger than that that’s particularly good there are two rhetorical devices that Saul Goodman is making use of right here to nice outcomes the primary is that he’s referring to the dramaturgical so he is placing the jury up on a stage displaying them that humans are observing and quantity two he is ascribing the values that he wants to the jury he’s announcing that they are bigger than that hoping that they will upward push to the attribute that he’s already ascribed to them so these are two killer persuasive tactics that Saul Goodman has used here oh god what have they carried out oh no he’s simply gonna exhibit a video so on account that this is closing argument all the evidence has already are available so the prosecutor does not have to lay any foundation all of that has already been based for the duration of the direction of the trial and the choose has already authorised or denied the entire reveals including god simplest is aware of what’s going to be on this videotape oh no oh my god oh no all correct this can be a perfect illustration of typically the evidence just speaks for itself in Latin that is the phrase race if loquitur the thing speaks for itself and admittedly in many instances it does not require any legal argument you simply show the item itself and that’s dangerous sufficient routinely you do not have got to gild the lily or pound the rubble it is just unhealthy ample as it’s and if I was once the prosecutor on this exact case I on the whole would have completed the same thing just show the tape let it speaks for itself and let the jury decide this does not need any argument in any respect this is this is awful aunt hilarious how type of math is that seven-hundred per defense no no defendant dint three defendants 2,a hundred which by the way bargain what I did for them they going to reformatory Langer sausage what does that subject so i assume on this case Saul is a public defender as you can also understand there are two types of government attorneys on this context there are the prosecutors who are employed through the state to definitely prosecute these alleged of crimes and then there are also public defenders who provide a safeguard to people who can not afford one it goes back to the Nineteen Sixties to a Supreme court case referred to as Gideon versus Wainwright which held that below the sixth amendments safety to a trial defendants were required to have an attorney since if they didn’t have an legal professional the right to an impartial trial would under no circumstances be upheld considering it would be inherently unfair so under Supreme courtroom precedent for those who cannot have the funds for an attorney you are provided a public defender now that handiest applies in the crook context it does now not follow within the civil context in case you are sued civilly you’re basically to your own and that is the place attorneys like me a civil lawyer are available and we store your Baron Verulam that you would be able to tell me what this twenty six thousand purported to be for that’s cash for Chuck is not that what you wanted a measly 26 grand Jesus you’re like Peter Minuit with the Indians throw in some beads and shells at the same time you’re at it it can be only a start there will be more until you are gonna simply tear them all up and why was it made out to me why now not Chuck so he personally advised you that it can be his wish to withdraw from the company see that may shock me it can be been virtually a yr on the grounds that he set foot in here okay so one of the reasons that Jimmy would possibly not need to cash this investigate or have his patron cash this assess is that there is a doctrine in most jurisdictions that claims that even supposing you should not have a written contract an categorical contract that’s spelled out and has the entire phrases that you would be able to repeatedly enter into a contract by way of your behavior so I suppose he’s concerned concerning the suggestion that if he cashes this assess he could tacitly agree to the terms of this agreement with this other regulation corporation and thus give them the deal that they need which isn’t a deal that Jimmy or his customer wants so I feel he is involved about forming a contract contract by his own habits but i guess we will see 600 thirty bucks is that for one fall to 2 falls in sooner or later even at your age that is gotta damage actual that correct well I got a job for you that is two grand sounding too grand for one hit one hit plus you get to gain knowledge of from the first-class ok I usually don’t must inform you how unethical it is for an legal professional to go out and pay individuals to fake an harm and clearly defraud some terrible victim but let’s speak about one of the crucial nuances right here in the event that they were to head ahead with this plan they’d be conducting fraud and could be accountable for civil and probably criminal fraud now on high of that they’d not be competent to get compensation for anything accidents that they’ve of course fraud creates an affirmative security to the variety of allegations that they would want to create however extra fundamentally they lack what’s called standing in the united statessystem so as to go forward with a civil fit you must have standing you ought to show that you have suffered an damage and while you deliberately interact on this variety of conduct you negate the variety of staining that would provide rise to an harm so no longer most effective will they no longer be in a position to get compensation since they’ve defrauded anyone however they also lack the underlying factors of the the civil suit that lacks standing they usually lack in actionable harm so if they ever get caught this isn’t a excellent factor for all of them correct ok that was once the first episode of better name Saul and it didn’t disappoint I rather seem ahead to reviewing future episodes of this sequence it can be pleasant but now it is time to give higher call Saul a grade for legal realism so let’s suppose about this well we’ve practical depictions of the monotony of courtroom existence we now have some fairly good arguments being made looking to appeal to the jury’s emotional state we now have giant corporation attorneys being jerks we now have the unglamorous lifetime of an attorney who is solely looking to make ends meet and we’ve literal ambulance chasers who are throwing themselves in entrance of automobiles all in all we have a practical depiction of a variety of the components that go into a attorney’s lifestyles that not often get any reveal time with most effective minimal dramatic license so i am giving better name Saul episode 1 and a – for authorized realism well carried out so hit that belt to be notified of my next reaction and verify out this playlist I put collectively that entails all of my prior reactions including my response to suits the great spouse and lots of others so click on on that playlist and i’m going to see you in court docket