#Berean Reader's Bible | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

hunteruni481 · 3 years

Text

Free Download Traktor Pro 2 Mac

E-Sword — the world's most popular PC Bible study software is now available on the world's most advanced desktop operating system! E-Sword X is a complete re-design of the PC version of e-Sword, capitalizing on what we have learned from 15 years of writing Bible software. E-Sword X is feature rich and user friendly. As your library grows you will appreciate the intuitive layout. Download and Install e-Sword X: Bible Study Extreme. Download for PC - server 1 - MAC: Download for MacOS - server 1 - $9.99 Thank you for visiting our site. Have a nice day! Berean Bible Study Library. You are on your way to new depths of discovery and understanding of God's Word. To help you maximize your e-Sword Bible study, eStudySource has put together an exclusive offer of 40% savings! The Berean Bible Study Library includes 3 of the most popular Bible study resources for e-Sword. E-sword bible free download for mac. Most people looking for E-sword bible free for mac downloaded: e-Sword. E-Sword is a fast and effective way to study the Bible. E-Sword is feature rich and user friendly with more. E-sword bible free download for mac. Download; About; Contact; Training; FAQ; Extras; Links; Donate; e-Sword Logo e-Sword. E-Sword X — Bible Study for the Mac; e-Sword HD — Bible Study for the iPad; e-Sword LT — Bible Study for the iPhone; Help keep e-Sword available on the Internet for free! EStudySource — the exclusive source for bestselling e-Sword Bibles.

Download Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 for Mac free latest version offline setup for macOS. Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 for Mac is a professional application for handling sounds and delivers better music and DJ features.

Traktor Scratch Pro 2 Download

Traktor 2 Pro Download For Windows

Dj Traktor Pro 2 Free Download Mac

Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 for Mac Review

Traktor Scratch Pro 2 Download

Traktor pro 2 mac free download - Traktor Pro, Traktor Pro, WinZip Mac, and many more programs.

8/10 (197 votes) - Download Traktor Free. Traktor is the best software designed by Native Instruments in terms of DJ programs. It offers us plenty of professional tools when it comes to mixing music. In the field of programs to mix music and deejay songs, there is a wide range of options.

TRAKTOR DJ 2 is a DJ app without barriers; it’s free, SoundCloud Go+ integration means you have access to an endless track collection, and TRAKTOR’s song recommendations help you choose which one to play next. All you need is a laptop or iPad. Traktor Pro 2 2.6.0 for Mac is available as a free download on our application library. The most popular version among the program users is 2.6. The program is included in Audio & Video Tools. Adobe reader for macbook pro free download softonic. Our antivirus analysis shows that this Mac download is safe.

A powerful application for handling the music, Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 for Mac comes with a professional set of tools and a straightforward user interface that makes it convenient for the users to get more control over the music. It provides a variety of powerful tools for sonic sculpting and provides the best sound quality to beat the floors. It provides a neat and clean solution with a bundle of powerful features.

New time-stretching features and improved limiter along with another advanced set of tools makes it a unique and reliable environment. It also comes up with beat matching features along with blending features to enhance the music. Match beats with the Sync button and performs various mixing operations to generate masterpieces. It is a professional application with a variety of powerful tools to enhance the music. All in a nutshell, it is a reliable application with a variety of customizable settings.

Traktor 2 Pro Download For Windows

Features of Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 for Mac

Powerful application for enhancing the music

Simple and a straightforward user interface

A powerful set of tools for editing and enhancing audio

Provides complete control over the soundtracks

Comes up with new tools for sonic sculpting

Delivers best sound quality and better performance

New time-stretching features and improved limiter

A powerful set of BeatMatching skills

Blending genres and bridge BPMs

Generate remixes with loops, BeatJumps and Hotcues

Complete FX suite included with high-quality effects

Provides flattening and sharpening features

Mastering and channel level metering tools

A variety of other powerful options and features

Technical Details of Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 for Mac

File Name: Native_Instruments_Traktor_Pro_3.2.1.9.dmg

File Size: 402 MB

Developer: Native Instruments

System Requirements for Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 for Mac

macOS 10.12 or later

2 GB free HDD

4 GB RAM

Intel Multi-Core Processor higher

Dj Traktor Pro 2 Free Download Mac

Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 for Mac Free Download

Download Native Instruments Traktor Pro 3.2 free latest version offline setup for macOS by clicking the below button.

0 notes

christianstevefinnell · 3 years

Text

The Bible is its Own Best Interpreterby

Dave Miller, Ph.D.

Many excellent books have been written that discuss the principles involved in understanding the Bible. Within churches of Christ, for example, several fine volumes have been produced to assist the Christian in comprehending the Bible’s intended meanings (e.g., Dungan, 1888; Lockhart, 1901; Kearley, et al., 1986). One feature of the process of interpreting the Bible is the Bible’s own ability to shed light on its meaning. The Holy Spirit caused the Bible to be written with the specific intention that people would be able to understand its message. Consequently, the Bible shares in common with other books the basic characteristics that one might expect any piece of written communication to possess. It utilizes the same laws of thought and language, and it assumes that the honest, sincere, dedicated student can arrive at the meanings intended by the Author.Perhaps the greatest deterrent to a proper interpretation of the Bible is the widespread and growing sense of uncertainty in the acquisition of absolute truth. American civilization has been inundated with pluralism, and has been brow-beaten into accepting the notion that one belief is as good as another, and that it really does not matter what one believes. Since so many people hold to so many conflicting beliefs, it is commonly thought that no one should be so intolerant, arrogant, and mean-spirited as to think that

has a corner on truth. One belief is as good as another, so we are told. And the same principle applies to religion, ethics, and virtually every other facet of human existence. Agnosticism (the philosophical posture that insists that one cannot

know

) has literally come to dominate our society. Perhaps the majority of Americans now feel that one cannot know whether the God of the Bible exists, whether the Bible is the one and only Word of God, whether Christianity is the only true religion, or whether New Testament Christianity is distinguishable from denominationalism.

TRUTH, LOGIC, AND KNOWLEDGE

At the heart of the issue of how the Bible should be interpreted, and whether the Bible is its own best interpreter, lies the deeper question of whether we humans are capable of

knowing

anything for certain, whether we can use logic to

reason

correctly, and whether we can arrive at

truth

. These preconditions for understanding the Bible may seem obvious and self-evident to Christians. But we are living at a time in which most people have been influenced to think that we cannot be

certain

about knowing anything. It goes without saying that this viewpoint is self-contradictory. Yet many continue to believe it.Of course, the Bible is filled with statements that presuppose (and, in fact, absolutely demand) that we reason correctly, weigh evidence, and come to correct conclusions regarding God’s will. Through Isaiah, God beckoned: “Come now, and let us reason together” (1:18), and “State your case, that you may be acquitted” (43:26). The noble Bereans “searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so” (Acts 17:11). Paul said he was appointed for “the defense of the gospel” (Philippians 1:17). He insisted that the Thessalonians “test all things; hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). He told Timothy to rightly divide the word of truth and to correct those who were in opposition (2 Timothy 2:15,25). Peter urged us to “always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you” (1 Peter 3:15). John warned: “Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world” (1 John 4:1). And Jude said that we must “contend earnestly for the faith” (Jude 3). Every single one of these verses, and many, many more, demand that the individual engage in a process of assessing facts, investigating circumstances, weighing evidence, diligent thinking, and reasoning, in order to arrive at the truth.Yet, the

magnitude

of disagreement that exists in the world is astonishing. It is frustrating, depressing, heart-rending, and mind-boggling. For example, in American

politics

, a wide range of viewpoints exists with a multiplicity of variations and shades. How can so many politicians adamantly insist that abortion is absolutely right and good, while many other politicians, with equal vigor, insist that abortion is evil and wrong? How can people be so diametrically opposed to each other’s viewpoints? In

religion

, the diversity and cleavage is incredible. Christendom is hopelessly divided due to differing doctrinal views. The vast majority of those who claim to be following Christ adamantly maintain that water immersion is not necessary to salvation. Millions believe that it is appropriate to sprinkle infants, or to worship God with instruments of music, or that you cannot fall from grace. The religious division that exists in the entire

world

is even more staggering, since, for example, Islam (representing over a billion people) and Hinduism (representing about a billion people) are in absolute and complete contradiction to each other. By the very nature of their views, they cannot possibly “agree to disagree.” Atheism maintains that

all

religion is crazy. Karl Marx said that religion is the “opiate of the people.” So to the communist, evolutionist, and atheist, religion is actually

harmful and detrimental

to society.With such irreparable, irreversibly deep diversity, no wonder so many have thrown up their hands and concluded that we cannot know for sure who is right and who is wrong (or perhaps more commonly, it really does not matter what is right and wrong). But after surveying the disconcerting, discouraging condition of the world’s lack of interest in ascertaining spiritual reality, one can return once again to the Bible, bring the entire state of affairs back into focus, and make perfect sense of the situation. It has ever been this way! The vast majority of humanity has always chosen to go its own way—for a variety of reasons and motivations. But

the truth can be ascertained

! Hence, they are

all

without excuse (cf. Romans 1:20).The notion that the Bible is its own best interpreter was articulated during the Reformation as a reaction to the Catholic notion that the church was the final interpreter of God’s Word. The reformers took issue with this claim, and insisted instead that “Scripture is its own interpreter” (

Scriptura sacra sui ipsius interpres

). What they meant was that the totality of the Bible must be allowed to interpret every part of the Bible. Thus, “no part of Scripture can be so interpreted as to deform the teaching of the whole of Scripture” (Ramm, et al., 1987, p. 23). As Milton Terry observed: “God’s written word, taken as a whole, and allowed to speak for itself, will be found to be its own best interpreter” (n.d., p. 162; cf. p. 222).There is much to be said for the recognition that to really understand the Bible—to really

know

the Bible—one must study the Bible book by book, giving attention to the contextual variables that characterize each individual book, and grasping the overall argument and line of reasoning inherent in each book. Clinton Lockhart, a Christian who authored a textbook on hermeneutics in 1901 that, by some estimations, surpasses the work of Dungan, pointed out that “no man that reads the Bible merely as a collection of proverbs or disconnected texts can ever understand the real nature of the sacred volume” (p. 233). Indeed, there is no substitute or shortcut to Bible interpretation. One must develop a broad and thorough familiarity with the entire Bible

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON HOLY SPIRIT BAPTISM

The Scriptures contain within them the keys to their own interpretation. Take, for example, the question of Holy Spirit baptism. The charismatic community typically associates the expression “Holy Spirit baptism” with the phenomenon that enables the believer to speak in tongues, heal someone, or work other miracles. In other words, Holy Spirit baptism is simply a

generic

reference to miraculous empowerment. Anyone who can speak in a tongue or perform any other miraculous action is said to have been baptized in the Holy Spirit. He is said to be “Spirit-filled.” However, the Bible actually alludes to Holy Spirit baptism in a very narrow, specialized, even technical sense (see

Miller

, 2003). Just because a person could speak in tongues or work miracles did not necessarily mean he or she had been baptized in the Holy Spirit. The principle of the Bible being its own best interpreter is well illustrated in the verses that allude directly to Holy Spirit baptism: Matthew 3:11; Acts 1:5; and Acts 11:16. In all three verses, Holy Spirit baptism is mentioned by name, and the language that is employed links the three occasions together. Thus, one critical principle involved in allowing the Bible to interpret itself is to recognize and accept the explicit explanations that verses often give on a particular subject.

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON BAPTISM AS A SYMBOL

Another example where we see the Bible being its own best interpreter pertains to baptism. The Protestant world has insisted that water baptism is a secondary and subsequent action to salvation. Various religionists have maintained that it serves as “an outward sign of an inward grace.” They claim that baptism is a

symbol

—a visible expression of the forgiveness already received at the point of faith. But the Bible nowhere articulates this provocative, illicit concept. It is the figment of someone’s vivid imagination that has been taken up and repeated so often that it sounds “biblical.” When Ananias prodded Paul to “arise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on the name of the Lord” (Acts 22:16), he said nothing about an alleged symbolic cleansing or post-forgiveness washing. He uttered not one word that would lead the unbiased reader to even remotely conclude that Paul’s sins were washed away

before

he was baptized.The grammar that the Holy Spirit selected by which to express Himself is very often a key to allowing the Bible to interpret itself. In Acts 22:16, the grammar further militates against the denominational interpretation so often placed on Paul’s baptism. The Holy Spirit utilized two participles and two verbs in verse 16 that clarify His intended meaning:

anastas is an aorist active participle: “having arisen” or “rising”baptisai is an aorist middle imperative verb: “get yourself baptized”apolousai is also an aorist middle imperative verb: “get your sins washed away”epikalesamenos is an aorist middle participle: “you will have been calling”

An adverbial participle is a participle that is used as an adverb to modify the verb. “Calling” is an adverbial participle of manner. It shows the

manner

in which the main verbs are accomplished. The verbs (“baptized” and “wash away sins”)—joined by the coordinate conjunction “and” (

kai

)—are “causative middles” (Robertson, 1934, p. 808) in the aorist tense, and so relate to the aorist middle of the participle that follows (“calling”). Hence, a literal translation would be: “Having arisen, get yourself baptized and get your sins washed away, and you will have been calling on the name of the Lord.” In other words, Ananias was telling Paul that the way to accomplish “calling on the Lord” was to be baptized and have his sins washed away. The Holy Spirit deliberately formulated the grammar of every passage in the Bible so that His writing would interpret itself!But doesn’t the Bible teach that baptism is, in fact, a

symbol

? Doesn’t baptism have “symbolic” significance? Yes, the Bible assigns symbolic significance to baptism in regard to at least three distinct features. Paul said that water baptism symbolizes the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus. He used the terms “likeness” and “form” to pinpoint this symbolism (Romans 6:5,17). He later identified a symbolic link between baptism and Old Testament circumcision—the idea that as skin was cut off by circumcision, so sins are cut off at baptism (Colossians 2:11-12). Peter added a third instance of baptism’s symbolic value. He compared a person passing through the water of baptism in order to be saved (by Christ’s resurrection) with the eight persons who were saved “by,” i.e.,

through

(

dia

) the water of the Flood of Noah’s day (1 Peter 3:20-21). Notice carefully how the Bible is its own best interpreter: baptism symbolizes: (1) Christ’s death, burial, and resurrection; (2) the “cutting off” of circumcision; and (3) the waters of the Flood. How in the world could anyone get out of this that baptism symbolizes

past

forgiveness that was achieved

prior

to being baptized?

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE NEW BIRTH

The account of Jesus’ encounter with Nicodemus has certainly spawned a great deal of resistance to the role of water baptism in God’s scheme of redemption. While the bulk of Christendom for most of the last 2,000 years has recognized that “water” in John 3:5 is an allusion to water baptism (Shepherd, 1894, pp. 320-338), in the last few decades, many have attempted to assign a different meaning to the word—everything from “blood,” “sperm,” and the “Spirit” to the “water” that accompanies the physical birth of a child (i.e., amniotic fluid). However, once again, the Bible is its own best interpreter.The context yields three useful factors. In the first place, Nicodemus thought being “born again” entailed physical birth (vs. 4). Jesus would not have followed up that misunderstanding by confirming it! If “water” in verse five refers to physical birth, then the flow of thought was that when Nicodemus asked if Jesus was referring to physical birth, Jesus responded that He was: “Do I have to be born physically a second time from my mother’s womb?” “Yes, you must be born of water….” In the second place, Jesus would not have told Nicodemus that one of the prerequisites for getting into the

spiritual

kingdom is physical birth. That would have Jesus making the redundant and ridiculous statement: “Before you can get into My kingdom, you first have to become a human being.” To frame such a statement would not only make Jesus appear oblivious to the fact that Nicodemus was

already

a human being, but also would put Jesus in the absurd position of thinking He needed to inform all non-humans (i.e., the animals) that they are

not

permitted entrance into the kingdom.In the third place, while multiple occurrences of the same word in the same context can have different meanings, attendant extenuating circumstances would be necessary in order to realize the distinction. No such factors are evident, especially since, eighteen verses later, the writer informs us that John the baptizer “was baptizing in Aenon near Salim, because there was much

water

there” (John 3:23, emp. added). Was John baptizing in that location because there was much

amniotic fluid

there? Or because there was much

blood

there? Or because the

Holy Spirit

was there? The Bible is indeed its own best interpreter!

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE KINGDOM

Premillennialists are fond of calling attention to the concluding prophetic remarks of Amos: “‘On that day I will raise up the tabernacle of David, which has fallen down, and repair its damages; I will raise up its ruins, and rebuild it as in the days of old; that they may possess the remnant of Edom, and all the Gentiles who are called by My name,’ says the Lord who does this thing” (Amos 9:11-12). They insist that the fulfillment of this prophecy is yet future. They say the Temple, which was destroyed in A.D. 70 by the Romans (Matthew 23:37-24:35), will be rebuilt on the Temple platform in Jerusalem (a site currently occupied by the third most holy shrine of Islam—the Dome of the Rock). They say that Jesus will return after the Rapture, the Tribulation, and Armageddon, and set up His millennial kingdom. They say He will reign on a literal throne for a thousand years, and incorporate the Gentiles, in addition to the nation of Israel, into His kingdom. On the face of it, this prophecy certainly possesses terminology that fits the millenarian interpretation placed upon it.However, two Bible passages dispute this interpretation, and settle the question as to the proper application of Amos’ prophecy. The first is the great Messianic prophecy uttered by the prophet Nathan to King David regarding David’s future lineage and royal dynasty (2 Samuel 7:12-16). Nathan declared that God would establish and sustain the Davidic dynasty. Even though he also noted that a permanent form of the Tabernacle (that God refused to allow David to build [2 Samuel 7:1-7]) would be built by David’s son (i.e., Solomon), God, Himself, would build David a house, i.e., a dynasty, a kingly lineage. It is this

lineage

to which Amos referred—not a physical temple building.The second passage that clarifies Amos’ prophecy is the account of the Jerusalem “conference” (Acts 15). Following Peter’s report regarding Gentile inclusion in the kingdom, James offered the following confirmatory comment: “Men and brethren, listen to me: Simon has declared how God at the first visited the Gentiles to take out of them a people for His name. And with this the words of the prophets agree, just as it is written” (Acts 15:13-15). James then quoted Amos 9:11-12. In other words, on that most auspicious occasion, James was noting two significant facts that had come to pass precisely as predicted by Amos: (1) after the downfall of the Jewish kingdom, the Davidic dynasty had been reinstated in the person of Christ—the “Son of David” (Matthew 22:42)—Who, at His ascension, had been enthroned in heaven, thereby “rebuilding the tabernacle of David that had fallen down”; and (2) with the conversion of the first Gentiles in Acts 10, as reported on this occasion by Peter, the “residue of men,” or the non-Jewish segment of humanity, was now “seeking the Lord.” I repeat: the Bible is its own best interpreter.A fitting conclusion to this feature of God’s amazing Word might be the remark made by Peter on the occasion of the establishment of the church of Christ on Earth. You no doubt remember how he and his fellow apostles, empowered by the Holy Spirit to speak foreign languages to the international audience gathered on that occasion were nevertheless accused of being intoxicated. After noting it was too early in the day for such an explanation to be plausible, he prefaced his quotation of Joel with the following words: “This is that….” Much of the effort that we expend in coming to a correct understanding of God’s Word will be directed toward that very goal. Peter was telling his Pentecost audience: the Bible is its own best interpreter.

REFERENCES

Dungan, D.R. (1888),

Hermeneutics

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light).Kearley, F. Furman, Edward P. Myers, and Timothy D. Hadley, eds. (1986),

Biblical Interpretation

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Lockhart, Clinton (1915),

Principles of Interpretation

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light), revised edition.Miller, Dave (2003), “Modern-day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy Spirit Baptism: A Refutation,” [On-line], URL:

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2572

.Ramm, Bernard, et al. (1987),

Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Robertson, A.T. (1934), A Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman).Shepherd, J.W. (1894),

Handbook on Baptism

(Nashville, TN: Gospel Advocate, 1972 reprint).Terry, Milton (no date),

Biblical Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan), reprint.

We are happy to grant permission for items in the "Doctrinal Matters" section to be reproduced in part or in their entirety, as long as the following stipulations are observed: (1) Apologetics Press must be designated as the original publisher; (2) the specific Apologetics Press Web site URL must be noted; (3) the author’s name must remain attached to the materials; (4) textual alterations of any kind are strictly forbidden; (5) Some illustrations (e.g., photographs, charts, graphics, etc.) are not the intellectual property of Apologetics Press and as such cannot be reproduced from our site without consent from the person or organization that maintains those intellectual rights; (6) serialization of written material (e.g., running an article in several parts) is permitted, as long as the whole of the material is made available, without editing, in a reasonable length of time; (7) articles, excepting brief quotations, may not be offered for sale or included in items offered for sale; and (8) articles may be reproduced in electronic form for posting on Web sites pending they are not edited or altered from their original content and that credit is given to Apologetics Press, including the web location from which the articles were taken.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press

230 Landmark Drive

Montgomery, Alabama 36117

U.S.A.

Phone (334) 272-8558

http://www.apologeticspress.org

0 notes

rjhamster · 3 years

Text

The Berean: Matthew 21:18-19 NKJV

The various commentaries provide a wealth of additional information to help us better understand this event, as the Bible leaves out a great deal that its authors expected their contemporary readers to know. With many years and thousands of miles of — Read on www.theberean.org/

View On WordPress

0 notes

officialyourdailyinspiration · 7 months

Text

God's Judgment on the Earth

Behold, the LORD lays waste the earth and leaves it in ruins. He will twist its surface and scatter its inhabitants— people and priest alike, servant and master, maid and mistress, buyer and seller, lender and borrower, creditor and debtor. The earth will be utterly laid waste and thoroughly plundered.

For the LORD has spoken this word.

The earth mourns and withers; the world languishes and fades; the exalted of the earth waste away. The earth is defiled by its people; they have transgressed the laws; they have overstepped the decrees and broken the everlasting covenant. Therefore a curse has consumed the earth, and its inhabitants must bear the guilt; the earth’s dwellers have been burned, and only a few survive.

The new wine dries up, the vine withers. All the merrymakers now groan. The joyful tambourines have ceased; the noise of revelers has stopped; the joyful harp is silent. They no longer sing and drink wine; strong drink is bitter to those who consume it.

The city of chaos is shattered; every house is closed to entry. In the streets they cry out for wine. All joy turns to gloom; rejoicing is exiled from the land. The city is left in ruins; its gate is reduced to rubble. So will it be on the earth and among the nations, like a harvested olive tree, like a gleaning after a grape harvest.

They raise their voices, they shout for joy; from the west they proclaim the majesty of the LORD. Therefore glorify the LORD in the east. Extol the name of the LORD, the God of Israel in the islands of the sea. From the ends of the earth we hear singing: “Glory to the Righteous One.”

But I said, “I am wasting away! I am wasting away! Woe is me.” The treacherous betray; the treacherous deal in treachery. Terror and pit and snare await you, O dweller of the earth. Whoever flees the sound of panic will fall into the pit, and whoever climbs from the pit will be caught in the snare.

For the windows of heaven are open, and the foundations of the earth are shaken. The earth is utterly broken apart, the earth is split open, the earth is shaken violently. The earth staggers like a drunkard and sways like a shack. Earth’s rebellion weighs it down, and it falls, never to rise again.

In that day the LORD will punish the host of heaven above and the kings of the earth below. They will be gathered together like prisoners in a pit. They will be confined to a dungeon and punished after many days. The moon will be confounded and the sun will be ashamed; for the LORD of Hosts will reign on Mount Zion and in Jerusalem, and before His elders with great glory. — Isaiah 24 | The Reader’s Bible (BRB) The Reader’s Bible © 2020 by Bible Hub and Berean.Bible. All rights Reserved. Cross References: Genesis 3:17; Genesis 7:11; Leviticus 19:9; Leviticus 25:36-37; Leviticus 26:39; Deuteronomy 23:19-20; Joshua 23:15; Job 12:25; Job 18:8; Psalm 144:14; Isaiah 2:12; Isaiah 2:19; Isaiah 5:6; Isaiah 5:11; Isaiah 12:5-6; Isaiah 14:31; Isaiah 16:10; Isaiah 23:1; Isaiah 33:9; Micah 2:4; Matthew 24:29; 2 Thessalonians 1:12; 2 Peter 3:10; Revelation 6:15; Revelation 18:22; Revelation 20:2

#God #judgment #Earth #Isaiah 24 #Book of Isaiah #Old Testament #BRB #Berean Reader's Bible #Bible Hub #Berean Bible

17 notes · View notes

goconservativechristian · 4 years

Text

The Bible is its Own Best Interpreterby

Dave Miller, Ph.D.

know

TRUTH, LOGIC, AND KNOWLEDGE

At the heart of the issue of how the Bible should be interpreted, and whether the Bible is its own best interpreter, lies the deeper question of whether we humans are capable of

knowing

anything for certain, whether we can use logic to

reason

correctly, and whether we can arrive at

truth

. These preconditions for understanding the Bible may seem obvious and self-evident to Christians. But we are living at a time in which most people have been influenced to think that we cannot be

certain

magnitude

of disagreement that exists in the world is astonishing. It is frustrating, depressing, heart-rending, and mind-boggling. For example, in American

politics

religion

world

all

religion is crazy. Karl Marx said that religion is the “opiate of the people.” So to the communist, evolutionist, and atheist, religion is actually

harmful and detrimental

the truth can be ascertained

! Hence, they are

all

Scriptura sacra sui ipsius interpres

know

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON HOLY SPIRIT BAPTISM

generic

Miller

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON BAPTISM AS A SYMBOL

symbol

before

An adverbial participle is a participle that is used as an adverb to modify the verb. “Calling” is an adverbial participle of manner. It shows the

manner

in which the main verbs are accomplished. The verbs (“baptized” and “wash away sins”)—joined by the coordinate conjunction “and” (

kai

symbol

through

(

dia

past

forgiveness that was achieved

prior

to being baptized?

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE NEW BIRTH

spiritual

already

a human being, but also would put Jesus in the absurd position of thinking He needed to inform all non-humans (i.e., the animals) that they are

not

water

there” (John 3:23, emp. added). Was John baptizing in that location because there was much

amniotic fluid

there? Or because there was much

blood

there? Or because the

Holy Spirit

was there? The Bible is indeed its own best interpreter!

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE KINGDOM

lineage

REFERENCES

Dungan, D.R. (1888),

Hermeneutics

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light).Kearley, F. Furman, Edward P. Myers, and Timothy D. Hadley, eds. (1986),

Biblical Interpretation

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Lockhart, Clinton (1915),

Principles of Interpretation

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light), revised edition.Miller, Dave (2003), “Modern-day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy Spirit Baptism: A Refutation,” [On-line], URL:

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2572

.Ramm, Bernard, et al. (1987),

Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Robertson, A.T. (1934), A Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman).Shepherd, J.W. (1894),

Handbook on Baptism

(Nashville, TN: Gospel Advocate, 1972 reprint).Terry, Milton (no date),

Biblical Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan), reprint.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press

230 Landmark Drive

Montgomery, Alabama 36117

U.S.A.

Phone (334) 272-8558

http://www.apologeticspress.org

#READ MORE AT. steve-finnell.blogspot.com

0 notes

coolksaposts · 4 years

Photo

23 O Lord, I know that the way of man is not in himself:

It is not in man that walketh oto direct his steps.

24 O Lord, pcorrect me, but with judgment;

Not in thine anger, lest thou †bring me to nothing. Jer 10+23-24 KJ

23 I know, Lord, that our lives are not our own.

We are not able to plan our own course.

24 So correct me, Lord, but please be gentle.

Do not correct me in anger, for I would die. NLT

23I know, O LORD, that a man’s way is not his own; no one who walks directs his own steps. 24Correct me, O LORD, but only with justice—not in Your anger, or You will bring me to nothing.…Berean Study Bible ·

Proverbs 3:6 in all your ways acknowledge Him, and He will make your paths straight. Proverbs 16:1 The plans of the heart belong to man, but the reply of the tongue is from the LORD. Proverbs 16:9 A man's heart plans his course, but the LORD determines his steps. Proverbs 20:24 A man's steps are from the LORD, so how can anyone understand his own way?

Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers

(23) O Lord, I know . . .--The confession is made not by the prophet for himself, but as by and for Israel.

The way of man.--The path which a man takes for good or evil, for failure or success. His conduct in life depends, the prophet says, on something more than his own choice :--

"There's a divinity that shapes our ends,

Rough-hew them how we will."

Compare Proverbs 16:9; Proverbs 20:24, as expressing the same thought of the necessity of divine guidance. The two Hebrew words for "man" are used in the two clauses, the first expressing the weakness, the latter the strength of men. Even the strong man has to confess that he needs a hand other than his own to direct his steps.

#man's plans #prayer #divine sovereignty #man's weakness #man's strength #insight #daily Bible

4 notes · View notes

taveaudrc · 4 years

Text

OFFICE MESSIAH...ALL 5 BOOK OF EPHESIANS 4 ROLLED INTO "THE MAIN ONE"

OFFICE MESSIAH…ALL 5 BOOK OF EPHESIANS 4 ROLLED INTO “THE MAIN ONE”

OFFICE MESSIAH…ALL 5 BOOK OF EPHESIANS 4 BIG OFFICES… ROLLED INTO “THE MAIN ONE” “For as much then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;” Be Ye Glad Hebrews 2:14

Based upon the following Holy Bible passages…so that my Reader may Noble Berean peruse…

View On WordPress

#Christian #DFW Leader Ministry Fellowship #prohetic

0 notes

stevefinnellp-blog · 5 years

Text

The Bible is its Own Best Interpreterby

Dave Miller, Ph.D.

know

TRUTH, LOGIC, AND KNOWLEDGE

At the heart of the issue of how the Bible should be interpreted, and whether the Bible is its own best interpreter, lies the deeper question of whether we humans are capable of

knowing

anything for certain, whether we can use logic to

reason

correctly, and whether we can arrive at

truth

. These preconditions for understanding the Bible may seem obvious and self-evident to Christians. But we are living at a time in which most people have been influenced to think that we cannot be

certain

magnitude

of disagreement that exists in the world is astonishing. It is frustrating, depressing, heart-rending, and mind-boggling. For example, in American

politics

religion

world

all

religion is crazy. Karl Marx said that religion is the “opiate of the people.” So to the communist, evolutionist, and atheist, religion is actually

harmful and detrimental

the truth can be ascertained

! Hence, they are

all

Scriptura sacra sui ipsius interpres

know

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON HOLY SPIRIT BAPTISM

generic

Miller

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON BAPTISM AS A SYMBOL

symbol

before

An adverbial participle is a participle that is used as an adverb to modify the verb. “Calling” is an adverbial participle of manner. It shows the

manner

in which the main verbs are accomplished. The verbs (“baptized” and “wash away sins”)—joined by the coordinate conjunction “and” (

kai

symbol

through

(

dia

past

forgiveness that was achieved

prior

to being baptized?

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE NEW BIRTH

spiritual

already

a human being, but also would put Jesus in the absurd position of thinking He needed to inform all non-humans (i.e., the animals) that they are

not

water

there” (John 3:23, emp. added). Was John baptizing in that location because there was much

amniotic fluid

there? Or because there was much

blood

there? Or because the

Holy Spirit

was there? The Bible is indeed its own best interpreter!

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE KINGDOM

lineage

REFERENCES

Dungan, D.R. (1888),

Hermeneutics

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light).Kearley, F. Furman, Edward P. Myers, and Timothy D. Hadley, eds. (1986),

Biblical Interpretation

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Lockhart, Clinton (1915),

Principles of Interpretation

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light), revised edition.Miller, Dave (2003), “Modern-day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy Spirit Baptism: A Refutation,” [On-line], URL:

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2572

.Ramm, Bernard, et al. (1987),

Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Robertson, A.T. (1934), A Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman).Shepherd, J.W. (1894),

Handbook on Baptism

(Nashville, TN: Gospel Advocate, 1972 reprint).Terry, Milton (no date),

Biblical Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan), reprint.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press

230 Landmark Drive

Montgomery, Alabama 36117

U.S.A.

Phone (334) 272-8558

http://www.apologeticspress.org

0 notes

stevefinnell-blog · 5 years

Text

The Bible is its Own Best Interpreterby

Dave Miller, Ph.D.

know

TRUTH, LOGIC, AND KNOWLEDGE

At the heart of the issue of how the Bible should be interpreted, and whether the Bible is its own best interpreter, lies the deeper question of whether we humans are capable of

knowing

anything for certain, whether we can use logic to

reason

correctly, and whether we can arrive at

truth

. These preconditions for understanding the Bible may seem obvious and self-evident to Christians. But we are living at a time in which most people have been influenced to think that we cannot be

certain

magnitude

of disagreement that exists in the world is astonishing. It is frustrating, depressing, heart-rending, and mind-boggling. For example, in American

politics

religion

world

all

religion is crazy. Karl Marx said that religion is the “opiate of the people.” So to the communist, evolutionist, and atheist, religion is actually

harmful and detrimental

the truth can be ascertained

! Hence, they are

all

Scriptura sacra sui ipsius interpres

know

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON HOLY SPIRIT BAPTISM

generic

Miller

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON BAPTISM AS A SYMBOL

symbol

before

An adverbial participle is a participle that is used as an adverb to modify the verb. “Calling” is an adverbial participle of manner. It shows the

manner

in which the main verbs are accomplished. The verbs (“baptized” and “wash away sins”)—joined by the coordinate conjunction “and” (

kai

symbol

through

(

dia

past

forgiveness that was achieved

prior

to being baptized?

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE NEW BIRTH

spiritual

already

a human being, but also would put Jesus in the absurd position of thinking He needed to inform all non-humans (i.e., the animals) that they are

not

water

there” (John 3:23, emp. added). Was John baptizing in that location because there was much

amniotic fluid

there? Or because there was much

blood

there? Or because the

Holy Spirit

was there? The Bible is indeed its own best interpreter!

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE KINGDOM

lineage

REFERENCES

Dungan, D.R. (1888),

Hermeneutics

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light).Kearley, F. Furman, Edward P. Myers, and Timothy D. Hadley, eds. (1986),

Biblical Interpretation

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Lockhart, Clinton (1915),

Principles of Interpretation

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light), revised edition.Miller, Dave (2003), “Modern-day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy Spirit Baptism: A Refutation,” [On-line], URL:

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2572

.Ramm, Bernard, et al. (1987),

Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Robertson, A.T. (1934), A Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman).Shepherd, J.W. (1894),

Handbook on Baptism

(Nashville, TN: Gospel Advocate, 1972 reprint).Terry, Milton (no date),

Biblical Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan), reprint.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press

230 Landmark Drive

Montgomery, Alabama 36117

U.S.A.

Phone (334) 272-8558

http://www.apologeticspress.org

0 notes

megaonewayjesuslove-blog · 5 years

Text

The Bible is its Own Best Interpreterby

Dave Miller, Ph.D.

know

TRUTH, LOGIC, AND KNOWLEDGE

At the heart of the issue of how the Bible should be interpreted, and whether the Bible is its own best interpreter, lies the deeper question of whether we humans are capable of

knowing

anything for certain, whether we can use logic to

reason

correctly, and whether we can arrive at

truth

. These preconditions for understanding the Bible may seem obvious and self-evident to Christians. But we are living at a time in which most people have been influenced to think that we cannot be

certain

magnitude

of disagreement that exists in the world is astonishing. It is frustrating, depressing, heart-rending, and mind-boggling. For example, in American

politics

religion

world

all

religion is crazy. Karl Marx said that religion is the “opiate of the people.” So to the communist, evolutionist, and atheist, religion is actually

harmful and detrimental

the truth can be ascertained

! Hence, they are

all

Scriptura sacra sui ipsius interpres

know

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON HOLY SPIRIT BAPTISM

generic

Miller

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON BAPTISM AS A SYMBOL

symbol

before

An adverbial participle is a participle that is used as an adverb to modify the verb. “Calling” is an adverbial participle of manner. It shows the

manner

in which the main verbs are accomplished. The verbs (“baptized” and “wash away sins”)—joined by the coordinate conjunction “and” (

kai

symbol

through

(

dia

past

forgiveness that was achieved

prior

to being baptized?

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE NEW BIRTH

spiritual

already

a human being, but also would put Jesus in the absurd position of thinking He needed to inform all non-humans (i.e., the animals) that they are

not

water

there” (John 3:23, emp. added). Was John baptizing in that location because there was much

amniotic fluid

there? Or because there was much

blood

there? Or because the

Holy Spirit

was there? The Bible is indeed its own best interpreter!

THE BIBLE: ITS OWN BEST INTERPRETER ON THE KINGDOM

lineage

REFERENCES

Dungan, D.R. (1888),

Hermeneutics

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light).Kearley, F. Furman, Edward P. Myers, and Timothy D. Hadley, eds. (1986),

Biblical Interpretation

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Lockhart, Clinton (1915),

Principles of Interpretation

(Delight, AR: Gospel Light), revised edition.Miller, Dave (2003), “Modern-day Miracles, Tongue-Speaking, and Holy Spirit Baptism: A Refutation,” [On-line], URL:

http://www.apologeticspress.org/articles/2572

.Ramm, Bernard, et al. (1987),

Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Baker).Robertson, A.T. (1934), A Grammar of the Greek New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman).Shepherd, J.W. (1894),

Handbook on Baptism

(Nashville, TN: Gospel Advocate, 1972 reprint).Terry, Milton (no date),

Biblical Hermeneutics

(Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan), reprint.

For catalog, samples, or further information, contact:

Apologetics Press

230 Landmark Drive

Montgomery, Alabama 36117

U.S.A.

Phone (334) 272-8558

http://www.apologeticspress.org

#READ MORE at. steve-finnell.blogspot.com

0 notes

revpauljbern · 5 years

Text

This week’s continuing Bible studies with Pastor Paul J. Bern will be part 1 of Acts 17

Paul and Silas' Missionary Journey Continues

[Acts chapter 17, verses 1-12]

For a website view, click here :-)

Last week when we concluded Acts 16, Paul and Silas had just left Philippi, where they had been imprisoned for the previous 24 hours, and where they had been beaten with whips. But for Paul and Silas, it was worth it all considering how many people had been led to the Lord there. Moreover, the people of Philippi were so deeply moved and inspired by the 2 apostles' resolute courage that they founded a church there. It is this very church to which Paul later wrote his letter to them, which ultimately was turned into the Book of Philippians, one of the most inspiring reads in all the New Testament. Having completed the first portion of their journey, they traveled east to Thessalonica, and then still further to Berea in the area around the border between Greece and Turkey today. And so as we begin part one of this week's in-depth study of Acts 17, we find Paul and Silas heading to Thessalonica.

“1) When Paul and his companions had passed through Amphipolis and Apollonia, they came to Thessalonica, where there was a Jewish synagogue. 2) As was his custom, Paul went into the synagogue, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, 3) explaining and proving that the Messiah had to suffer and rise from the dead. 'This Jesus I am proclaiming to you is the Messiah,' he said. 4) Some of the Jews were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, as did a large number of God-fearing Greeks and quite a few prominent women. 5) But other Jews were jealous; so they rounded up some bad characters from the marketplace, formed a mob and started a riot in the city. They rushed to Jason’s house in search of Paul and Silas in order to bring them out to the crowd. 6) But when they did not find them, they dragged Jason and some other believers before the city officials, shouting: 'These men who have caused trouble all over the world have now come here, 7) and Jason has welcomed them into his house. They are all defying Caesar’s decrees, saying that there is another king, one called Jesus. 8) When they heard this, the crowd and the city officials were thrown into turmoil. 9) Then they made Jason and the others post bond and let them go.” (Acts 17, verses 1-9)

Into the synagogue at Thessalonica went Paul and Silas to preach the Word. Evidently, they were well received, otherwise they would not have been invited a total of three times. They were also quite effective in their testimony and their instruction, as we see in verses 3 and 4: “....explaining and proving that the Messiah had to suffer and rise from the dead. 'This Jesus I am proclaiming to you is the Messiah,' he said. 4) Some of the Jews were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, as did a large number of God-fearing Greeks and quite a few prominent women.” So here we have the apostle Paul, sometimes called “the 13th apostle” in some theological circles today, telling it like it truly is to those in attendance at the synagogue at Thessalonica. Jesus is the risen Lord and Savior, Paul told them, making him Messiah, and the entire Hebrew nation had missed it, not realizing who Christ was. Also, notice once again that there were at least as many non-Jews in attendance in the synagogue as there were Jews.

“5) But other Jews were jealous; so they rounded up some bad characters from the marketplace, formed a mob and started a riot in the city. They rushed to Jason’s house in search of Paul and Silas in order to bring them out to the crowd. 6) But when they did not find them, they dragged Jason and some other believers before the city officials....” Things were much the same back then as they are today – those in positions of power and authority will inevitably abuse their authority every chance they get. So it was with the synagogue leadership there in Thessalonica, who organized a mob for the sole express purpose of forcibly removing Paul and Silas from Jason's house, presumably to take them outside the city gates and to kill them both. But the Lord was with them, I am sure, because they both knew to stay elsewhere that night. There is no way that Paul's and Silas' absence from Jason's house was a mere coincidence. This, everyone, is just one example of multitudes regarding what great lengths God will go to in order to protect preachers of and believers in his Word.

“They are all defying Caesar’s decrees, saying that there is another king, one called Jesus. 8) When they heard this, the crowd and the city officials were thrown into turmoil. 9) Then they made Jason and the others post bond and let them go.” This, ladies and gentlemen, is how change is thwarted by the status quo. This is how resistance to change for the better is stopped in its tracks – unless, of course, the change is ordained by God. In this case, it most certainly was. Jason and the other believers with him were made to post bond like criminals, because Christianity was still criminalized at that time, and it continued to be for about 250 more years. The posting of bail by Jason and company brings us to part 2 of this week's lesson: “10) As soon as it was night, the believers sent Paul and Silas away to Berea. On arriving there, they went to the Jewish synagogue. 11) Now the Berean Jews were of more noble character than those in Thessalonica, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true. 12) As a result, many of them believed, as did also a number of prominent Greek women and many Greek men.” (Acts 17, verses 10-12)

After nightfall that same day, Paul and Silas were quietly escorted out of town by a few of the brothers, escaping any further persecution there. They traveled further to the east to Berea, a city in Macedonia that is actually in northern Greece today. Arriving in the synagogue there, Paul began to preach the Word with great effect, “....for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true. 12) As a result, many of them believed, as did also a number of prominent Greek women and many Greek men.” Notice, as I have pointed out before, that the Gospel of Christ is freely and equally available to Jew and Gentile or to men and women, and all at once. That is true Christianity as it was meant to be taught, and to be lived as a lifestyle. Human equality, my dear readers, is Scriptural.

The people of Berea did more than merely express belief in the risen Redeemer, they embraced him as the Son of God. This embrace means maintaining a personal relationship with the risen Lord, a one-on-one relationship, like a marriage. This concept of a personal relationship between Jesus and his followers could never be allowed by the Jews at Thessolonica – or in any other synagogue – because it would have made their own functions at the Temple obsolete. In other words, they all would have been out of a job. This is the main difference between the Old Testament and the New Testament: In the old one, God is far away and aloof. He cannot be looked at directly or touched in any way, but in the New Testament, God has come in the form of his Son, and has dwelt among us. The apostles all saw him and touched his wounds, and He remains with us in Spirit and in Truth. Next week when we move on to part 2, we'll see what happens next in Berea as the Pharisees in Thessalonica are informed of the location of Paul and Silas. See you then....

#Progressive Christian #the Book of Acts #the apostle Paul #the early Church #discipleship #Biblical Teaching #bible study

0 notes