Last Seen Blogs
theyseethroughrobots
STERLING WAYWARD
bummelwelt
Bummelwelt
rowancrafts
not active
ricardoagimenez
Sem título
Text
What kind of cases a husband can file against wife?
If a woman mistreats him, the husband has the right to file a lawsuit. However, unlike those under IPC Section 498A, such proceedings are not subject to criminal law. These could be divorce proceedings in which the husband wants to break the union because of his wife's behavior. Cruelty is one of the gender-neutral grounds for divorce, among the other grounds or causes. Depending on a person's faith, personal rules govern both marriage and divorce. Cruelty is a basis for divorce under certain Indian laws.
In India, both husbands and wives have access to the legal system to handle a variety of problems that could develop in a marriage. In India, a husband may bring the following claims against his wife:
If there are grounds for dissolving the marriage, such as cruelty, desertion, adultery, or mutual consent, the husband may do so in accordance with the terms of the Hindu Marriage Act, Special Marriage Act, or Indian Divorce Act (depending on the couple's faith).
According to the stipulations of the Hindu Marriage Act, Special Marriage Act, or Indian Divorce Act (depending on the couple's religion), the husband may end the marriage if there are grounds for doing so, such as cruelty, desertion, adultery, or mutual consent.
The rights of the husband are frequently disregarded more severely under Indian law in circumstances of abuse. Legislators are unable to comprehend that there are men as well as women who commit mental abuse in marriage. The Indian Penal Code, 1860's Section 498A provisions clearly designate a woman as the aggressor and her husband or his family as the accused. Because of this, women frequently misuse 498A, whether or not the charges are supported by evidence. It is not possible to compromise or compound the charge of cruelty under Section 498A. However, it is now very common for the High Courts to dismiss FIRs under Section 498A.
A complaint may be made under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code if the husband is the target of dowry demands, cruelty, or harassment because of the dowry. This section addresses abuse of the wife by the husband or members of his family, but husbands may also utilise it to pursue legal action.
The Supreme Court observed in the case of Kanchan v. Kamalendra, AIR 1993 Bom 493, that Section 24 permits both the wife and the husband to request support pendente lite if they can both show that they have no other independent source of income. However, the husband must show the court that a physical or mental impairment prevents him from working and providing for his family. The spouse could not be given maintenance since he was healthy and not mentally ill and because the only reason his business failed was that it went against the letter of Section 24 of the Act.
If a spouse cannot financially support himself, he may request maintenance or alimony in the event of a separation or divorce. The spouse might ask the family court for his wife's financial support.
Child custody: If the marriage has kids and the husband wants to get custody of them, he can submit a petition. When considering custody disputes, the court takes the child's best interests into account.
Adultery: The spouse may submit a complaint under Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code if the wife has had an extramarital affair. It's crucial to remember that this part is debatable since it only takes a married woman's extramarital connection into account—not her husband's.
In other words, even though the husbands are capable of working for a living on their own, it is not common practice for them to request maintenance from their working spouses. Only individuals who are truly and completely unable to sustain themselves are intended to get assistance under the Hindu Marriage Act's provisions. As was previously stated, only a "deserving man" is qualified to assert this privilege. The payment of maintenance to the husband will reduce the number of divorce proceedings since it will obligate the wife to support her helpless husband. And the wife would rather stay married than grant her husband a divorce and maintenance.
If the case has been filed in Noida, then Bail Lawyers Noida may be hired. Likewise, if the case has been filed in Faridabad, then a Bail Lawyer In Faridabad may be appointed. Bail Lawyers In Delhi. may be hired if the case has been filed in Delhi.
To address the problem, Lead India provides a selection of data, legal services, and free legal advice. To get the best guidance in this case, ask a legal question and talk to a lawyer
SOURCE:-
Visit us: https://www.leadindia.law
Call Us: +91–8800788535
Email: [email protected]
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/LeadIndiaLawAssociates
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/leadindialaw
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/76353439
Twitter: https://twitter.com/leadindialaw
Pinterest: https://in.pinterest.com/lawleadindia
Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/leadindialawofficial
Bail Lawyers Noida, Bail Lawyer In Faridabad, Bail Lawyers In Delhi.
0 notes
Text
Where To Apply For Bail In False Sc/St Case?
In National Campaign for Dalit Human Rights v. Union of India, (2017) 2 SCC 432, it was determined that untouchability is no longer practiced and that Article 17 of the Constitution forbids it in all forms. Any impairment that results from being untouchable in accordance with Article 17 must be enforced, which is illegal and subject to legal penalties.
The Untouchability (Offenses) Act, 1955 was passed by the Parliament in order to give Article 17 its full legal and moral meaning. According to Sections 3 to 7 of the aforementioned Act, it was unlawful to impose any form of disability—religious, social, or otherwise—on the basis of untouchability.
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes continue to be vulnerable in spite of several efforts to better their socioeconomic circumstances. A few of their civil rights are denied. Many offenses, indignities, humiliations, and harassment are perpetrated against them.
They have been brutally robbed of their lives and possessions in a number of instances. Due to a variety of historical, social, and economic factors, serious crimes are frequently committed against them.
The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are attempting to establish their rights as a result of the knowledge raised among them by the dissemination of education, etc., and this is not being well received by the others.
Legal Provisions:
The SC/ST Act states in Section 18 that those who violate the Act are exempt from the provisions of Section 438 of the Code. When a person is arrested on suspicion of committing an offense under this Act, nothing in section 438 of the code applies to that situation. Reading the aforementioned clause makes it evident that violators of the SC/ST Act are not covered by Section 438 of the Code.
According to the complaint, the petitioners particularly mentioned the complainant's caste and insulted her and her family members, as well as physically assaulted them by yelling, "Beat the Mahar so that they should not dwell in the village.
In Vilas Pandurang Pawar & Anr v. State Of Maharashtra & Anr, it was stated that Section 18 of the SC/ST Act creates a hurdle for relying on Section 438 of the Code Ors, AIR 2012 SC 3316. Nonetheless, it is the court's responsibility to confirm the allegations in the complaint and determine whether a violation of Section 3(1) of the SC/ST Act has been shown prima facie. In other words, the accused are not eligible for anticipatory bail if there is a particular allegation in the complaint, such as insult or intimidation with the goal to degrade by using a derogatory caste term.
The application of Section 18 of the SC/ST Act when read in conjunction with Section 438 of the Code imposes a specific restriction on the issuance of anticipatory bail. No court shall consider a request for anticipatory bail where an offense under the SC/ST Act has been recorded against a person unless it makes a prima facie determination that the offense is not made out.
Therefore, there is little room to analyze the evidence and other information on file when evaluating the bail application. The court is not anticipated to engage in a critical examination of the submitted evidence. When a clause was added to the Special Act to protect members of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes and since Section 438 of the Code prohibited the granting of bail, the clause in the Special Act could not be readily disregarded by a lengthy discussion of the evidence.
The Chhattisgarh High Court most recently declared that anticipatory relief can be granted when the alleged violation of the SC/ST Act appears to be "a misuse of law." Yet as stated, more information is required on what precisely qualifies as a "misuse of law" and what factors judges must take into account when granting anticipatory relief. Without it, investigations are still hampered by the inability to detain suspects for significant crimes, which ultimately falls on the shoulders of the victims who are supposed to be protected by the Atrocities Act.
Top Lawyers In Mumbai can be searched if the case has been filed in Mumbai. Moreover, if the case has been filed in Delhi then the best Top Lawyers In Delhi can be appointed. Moreover, Best Lawyer In Delhi can be searched.
To address the issue Lead India provides a variety of knowledge, legal services, and free legal advice. To get the best guidance in this case, ask a legal question for free online and talk to a lawyer.
SOURCE:-
Visit us: https://www.leadindia.law
Call Us: +91–8800788535
Email: [email protected]
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/LeadIndiaLawAssociates
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/leadindialaw
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/76353439
Twitter: https://twitter.com/leadindialaw
Pinterest: https://in.pinterest.com/lawleadindia
Instagram:https://www.instagram.com/leadindialawofficial
Top Lawyers In Delhi, Top Lawyers In Mumbai, Best Lawyer In Delhi,
0 notes
Text
How to Get Bail in False SC/ST Case
The Prevention of Atrocities Act, passed by the Indian government in 1989, defines atrocities as crimes committed against members of the SC and ST schedules. It describes procedures and penalties for coming across such conduct or crimes. This Act seeks to end the harmful practice of untouchability while also reducing and regulating violence towards SCs and STs.
But during the last few years, there has been a noticeable rise in filing false cases under this act and its misuse.
The Prevention of Atrocities Act has offenses that are both cognizable and non-bailable. This suggests that if any offense against the SC/ST is committed in violation of the said Act, police have the authority to arrest without a warrant. Additionally, no bail may be given if the criminal is detained subject to the Act until and unless there exists no prima facie case.
Offenses under Prevention of Atrocities Act
Eating or drinking anything that isn't edible- It is an atrocity crime and is punished under the SC/ST Act when people of other communities force SC/STs to consume any inedible or dangerous substance.
Dumping Excreta/Waste- Excreta or waste material being dumped close to an SC/ST person's home is an outrage and a criminal offense. This causes them inconvenience, insult, or harm.
According to the Act, denying SC/ST people their desired voting rights is illegal.
Denying them the right to their land, water, or other properties or preventing them from cultivating their land
According to the Act, it is also illegal to make SC/ST people beg or work as bonded laborers.
Denying access to safe drinking water is illegal according to this act.
Publicly defaming or insulting is an offense under this act.
The SC/ST Act outlines false criminal accusations that result in the detention of SC/ST people as an offense.
SC/ST Prevention of Atrocities Act: Bailable or Not?
As I mentioned above, unless a bail application is filed to the Magistrate, offenses under the said Act are not subject to bail. If any offense was committed violating the Atrocities Act's provisions, one might submit a bail application to the Sessions Court. The Sessions Court has jurisdiction over these offenses.
If the Sessions Court denies the accused's request for bail, the accused may file a petition with the High Court. An accused person seeking regular bail must submit a criminal appeal with the High court u/s 14(A) 2 of the Prevention of Atrocities Act.
But according to a decision made by the Kerala High Court in 2022, a request for anticipatory bail can only be submitted before the Special Court or the Exclusive Special Court. According to Sections 438 and 482 of Crpc, the High Court lacks both concurrent and original jurisdiction.
Can a Court Grant Anticipatory Bail in a Case involving SC/ST?
According to the Gujarat High Court, the Court can grant anticipatory bail in the case involving SC/ST, if:
No abuses are hurled, and the case reeks of fabrication or falsification.
No prima facie case was made
The complaint is determined to be prima facie mala fide.
You will need a lawyer to file complaints, draft bail applications, and other legal procedures. If a person trapped in this situation wants to prepare or draft an application for anticipatory bail in Delhi, then a Top Lawyers in Delhi can be appointed. Likewise, Top Lawyers in Mumbai can be assigned if cases are filed in Mumbai.
For instance, applying for anticipatory bail should be done immediately if you are concerned that your maidservant would file an FIR against you.
You should be aware that an anticipatory bail won't be issued unless it can be demonstrated that there is no case to be made against you and the accusations are untrue. It is best to do this by getting in touch with experienced lawyers prepared to handle such delicate matters.
You can talk to a Lawyer in Delhi through Lead India Law. Lead India Law provides access to free legal advice by providing you with the opportunity to ask a legal question free online.
SOURCE:-
Visit us: — https://www.leadindia.law
Call Us: +91–8800788535
Email: [email protected]
YouTube: — https://www.youtube.com/c/LeadIndiaLawAssociates
Facebook: — https://www.facebook.com/leadindialaw
LinkedIn: — https://www.linkedin.com/company/76353439
Twitter: — https://twitter.com/leadindialaw
Pinterest: — https://in.pinterest.com/lawleadindia
Instagram: - https://www.instagram.com/leadindialawofficial
0 notes
Text
How Can I Hire A Lawyer For Bail?
Everybody has wondered this at some point when they have a legal problem to tackle. This is because not all of the lawyers in Delhi who can handle legal cases are qualified to do so, despite the city's abundance of lawyers. Therefore, several facts must be considered when selecting a lawyer.
Things to consider while hiring a lawyer:
References, reviews, and ratings are crucial while sifting among Delhi's numerous lawyers. You can ask friends, relatives, and coworkers who have experience with certain lawyers for recommendations.
Customers who have used the services of the law firm that represents the attorney post evaluations and ratings on the website. They should have a proven track record of providing excellent customer service, and none of their prior customers should have ever complained.
Meet the reputable lawyers you've chosen in person. Calling or speaking with attorneys online is a common method used by people to try to hire them. You'll be able to tell when you first meet someone if you feel comfortable speaking with them. You can assess their skill when they outline the legal issues that need to be resolved. You must be absolutely honest with them when you discuss your problems. There is no need to worry about paying for initial consultations because many respected attorneys provide them for free.
Choosing a lawyer who charges appropriately for their services is the best course of action. It is advisable to refrain from choosing the attorney who charges the lowest fees among the others. A less experienced attorney or one who has dismissed several cases will charge less.
A knowledgeable lawyer is best suited to manage legal situations. Legal concerns are typically resolved with the help of general counsel. They eventually reach unimpressive conclusions. Therefore, it is best to choose a lawyer skilled in dealing with those particular legal concerns.
Anytime during business hours, they ought to be able to answer your calls or get in touch with you. An overloaded attorney won't be able to adequately handle your case.
A lawyer from the same judicial district where your case needs to be filed or has already been filed against you should always be considered because they are more familiar with the local court system. If the case has been filed in Noida then Bail Lawyers Noida should be appointed. A Bail Lawyer in Faridabad can also be appointed if the case has been filed in Faridabad. Likewise, if the case has been filed in Delhi then Bail Lawyers in Delhi can be appointed.
They should be skilled in the negotiation because it helps them much in out-of-court settlements of legal disputes.
The ideal candidate for your case is a lawyer who has experience representing friends or family. They will prove to be of tremendous help in making your case in court efficiently. They will prove to be the best help for a number of factors. The reasons are:
They will gather the necessary proof to demonstrate their client's innocence. Because of this, the prosecution's case will probably be stronger and you might not be found guilty after multiple sessions.
They are able to create the necessary paperwork to deal with legal problems and protect your rights.
They will comprehend more effective strategies for hastening the resolution of the lawsuit.
The following qualities are also necessary for a bail lawyer to have in addition to zeal, knowledge, and expertise:
Committed: Criminal cases can become difficult, and the outcome can have a significant impact on a person's life. Choosing a lawyer who won't pressure you or your case and is genuinely devoted to seeing it through to a successful resolution is therefore vital.
Analysis: It takes a lot of information distillation to study a case, and it also takes management of all the data to win the case. It is possible to use more than one reasonable conclusion or precedent to address an issue at any one time.
Privacy: Not everyone feels comfortable talking about their issues, particularly court situations. Therefore, it's imperative that you seek out a lawyer who excels at upholding secrecy. It is essential for every defense lawyer to refrain from revealing information that can spark a debate or have bad outcomes.
You can contact to Lead India for hiring a lawyer. Here, you can talk to a lawyer and even ask a legal questions. We also provide free legal advice. You may be confident that the matter will be handled with professionalism as we have the best team of attorneys with the most experience
SOURCE:-
Visit us: — https://www.leadindia.law
Call Us: +91–8800788535
Email: [email protected]
YouTube: — https://www.youtube.com/c/LeadIndiaLawAssociates
Facebook: — https://www.facebook.com/leadindialaw
LinkedIn: — https://www.linkedin.com/company/76353439
Twitter: — https://twitter.com/leadindialaw
Pinterest: — https://in.pinterest.com/lawleadindia
Instagram: - https://www.instagram.com/leadindialawofficial
Bail Lawyers in Delhi, Bail Lawyers Noida, Bail Lawyer in Faridabad
0 notes