Last Seen Blogs
estudobiblicodiarioonline
Estudo Bíblico Diário Online
artimus5800-blog
Untitled
togaykurtulus
togay kurtuluş
the-boroughh
Your local hovel
Text
Intro to Baking
Intro to Baking was never introduced, explained, or touched upon further than Tyler saying he didn't want to do it, Josh saying he hoped that they could do it, and Mark saying they didn't have time to do it.
I fully believe that Intro to Baking is more significant than a scrapped segment.
Intro to Baking could very well be an anagram, similar to Scaled and Icy v. Clancy is Dead.
It could be the abbreviation for the next album's title, ITB. Scaled and Icy was teased this way, " SAI IS PROPAGANDA " appearing on the original cover of Christmas Saves the Year.
I don't think that we have enough to put together a solid title yet, through either method. There's nothing significant that can be made out currently.
EDIT - JAN. 11 23
as @faceofobsession mentioned in their reblog - NO kitchen camera setup was present or mentioned.
If it were an old clip, it would've been featured in the first Video Vault segment. They allude to the fact that it would've been a physical activity, so this is highly unlikely anyway.
Intro to Baking was literally just never meant to happen. So why was it there?
END EDIT
I'm Not Home.wav
An audio file that was prominently listed underneath the Vessel+Doubt Demos during Demo Dive.
I believe this could be the song that was "teased" at the end of the stream, or one that'll be featured in an upcoming MV.
It could also literally just be a demo for The Run and Go ( only song that really fits )? If that's the case, it's weird that it's the only .wav file, and that it hasn't been renamed. It wouldn't open into split folders, and would've literally just been the audio.
I have almost nothing to base this point off of - Nobody seems to be mentioning this, and there's not enough information to know regardless.
EDIT - JAN. 11 23
During GP Week Brazil, Tyler shaved his head and appeared with several newer scars on his face. This has yet to be addressed.
SAI is officially over, so could I'm Not Home be the next MV we get? Could it be the first explicitly Vøldsoy-related song ( aside from Migraine )?
Could the title reference Tyler/Clancy's change of perspective of Dema, or a reference to how unfamiliar Vøldsoy is comparatively?
END EDIT
I just know that both mean something. ~shesacarver
132 notes
·
View notes
Text
‘Lay me in a bed of red roses’🌹
Art by Takahiro Isobe
49 notes
·
View notes
Text
Welcome to: images of Gerard that make me drool but also give me gender envy
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
every show about teenagers should have an on site consultant aged 14-18 who looks over the script and says we would not fucking say that
87K notes
·
View notes
Text
"I wish I was a scene/emo kid in [insert year here] 🥺" no you don't
There were rampant amounts of all KINDS of ignorance and negative bias in those scenes because, as I think you should know, most people in those scenes were edgy teenagers in the late 2000s and early 2010s. Most kids in these scenes were:
Racist
VERY homophobic
SUPER transphobic
Fatphobic
Ableist (especially against autistic people)
Mega gatekeep-y
I'd say 2000s alternative revival scenes still carry these issues, but to a less blatant degree.
Just be glad you're an emo/scene kid today, where we can address these issues and not get completely ostracized from the subculture altogether.
437 notes
·
View notes
Photo
My top 2022 posts/art, as determined by tumblr’s 2022 year in review. ♥
692 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Young Viktor! I like to think he was once carefree and full of hope D:
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
imagine experiencing nighttime for the first time in Trench, after escaping the city.
Dema is bathed in that dull glow from the necropolis constantly, never truly dark.
And then you escape. The sky grows dark. It would be terrifying, in the pitch black. The ocean is blacker than black, the sky is too.
42 notes
·
View notes
Text
I've noticed something in the discussion around Gerard Way and trans identity that I am officially fed the fuck up with. While talking about Gerard's outfits from the second leg of the tour, people love to use use the line "clothes ≠ gender" as a gotcha for those of us who are keen to the fact that they aren't cis. This pisses me off for three main reason plus a fourth mini reason that's more of a history blurb than anything else.
Before we start anything, Gerard has been out as not cis for the better part of 8(!) years now. To not acknowledge that is doing them a disservice. Some of you have purposely chosen to ignore that fact. Right out the gate that's fucked up. Ok now we can proceed.
First off, you're right. Clothes do not, in fact, equal gender. I know this, and it sounds like you'd like me to believe that you know this. So forgive me for being a little confused when you go on anon after they're photographed wearing what you dub to be "masculine clothing" (i.e. anything that's not a skirt/dress with heels) and tell me I'm an idiot for implying that they aren't a cisgender man.
Secondly, the concept that clothes don't equal gender in only true to us very recently. If you think that Gerard Way, a 45 year old ex-Catholic Gen-X'er who grew up in an wildly conservative suburb of north New Jersey doesn't have a different relationship between clothing and gender than you, a 14-to-20-something year old who hasn't closed tiktok in three days and averages 0.3 minutes of critical thinking per week, then you're extremely delusional and self-centered. People are socialized in entirely different ways. As humans, our experiences are not in any way universal. What doesn't mean anything to you means everything to someone else. Maybe you don't equate femininity with skirts and dresses, but I guarantee you a 45 year old who has openly struggled with gender identity their entire life does in some capacity. This is not a bad thing.
Thirdly is that in your attempt to sound as woke and morally upright as possible, you're unintentionally (or intentionally, seeing as a considerable number of you are terfs,) discrediting and invalidating the way someone experiences gender euphoria because you personally don't get it. Gerard Way has only ever said "I don't use labels" in response to people implying that they're cishet. If your first reaction to seeing someone who could even potentially identify under the transfem umbrella experiencing visible gender euphoria in a dress is to say "oh well clothes don't equal gender, so I'm going to assume that he's a man in a dress until he explicitly outs himself", then congratulations! You're transphobic. Because that's the thing. When you use the rhetoric of clothes ≠ gender in that context, it becomes crystal clear you don't actually care about trans people. You just want to sound like the smartest person in the room. And you're willing to throw GNC trans people under the bus in order to achieve that goal.
I think people have forgotten big time that "don't assume my gender" originally meant "don't assume I'm cis", because now the way people interpret the rhetoric (don't assume my gender, clothes ≠ gender, I don't use labels, etc.,) and use it to prove a point only use it as if to say "it's inherently wrong and creepy to identify and acknowledge when people aren't cis. Cis is the default and the only safe assumption. Anything else is offensive and crossing a major boundary" and you can tell it's because they view transness as an insult to someone's character. We have to, collectively, stop viewing transness as an allegation you either have to beat or bear with. Alongside that, we have to stop assuming cisness.
881 notes
·
View notes
Text
And they were probably fucking crazy and like, touched by the hand of God.
normal wrapped stats
29 notes
·
View notes