Is this an unpopular opinion to say that â16 candlesâ is a bad movie, with an unclear plot, no real objective and with a lot of problematic scenes involving rape culture, sexism, racism, xenophobia and mysoginy? I watched it with an open mind, I really wanted to enjoy the moment, I tried to brush of the anger at the beginning telling myself that it was made in the 80âs⊠But surely people werenât that clueless? Let me explain:
1. The scene with a drunk Caroline is in fact a rape and should be seen as so.
In one scene, Caroline, who is the girlfriend of the male love interest in the story (Jake), has drunk too much. And- itâs unnecessary to precise but- itâs not a little hey-I-got-drunk-I-cant-walk kind of drunk, sheâs completely out of it. She canât realise when one of her friends cuts her hair, sheâs not able to think straight. So what happens next? Well, Jake, her bf, who is hella mad that she threw a party at his house when they were supposed to be just the two of them, and who claims he wants a more âseriousâ relationship decides to throw her away, he treats her like scum. Next thing you know, he tells Geek (a first year, I think?) to take her away and to âenjoyâ himself with her, all of this after saying that she is so drunk he couldâve had his way with her a couple of times but that the reason he doesnât is because he is not âin the moodâ.
Then Geek drives her around, takes pictures with her as âproofsâ that something happened between them, all the while Caroline is completely out of it. Then they wake up the next morning, and itâs even more infuriating because itâs like they followed the near-rape or however you want to call it scene with a scene of humour -but itâs not funny, really.
Why is that so bad? Well Caroline didnât give her consent for any of this, she just trusted the wrong people not to abuse of her when she wasnât able to give any consent. The boys treated her as an object, because sheâs a woman, they used her as a mean to an end. Jake used her because obviously he didnât want to party that night and -letâs be honest- because he wanted to get laid, and when it didnât go well, he GOT RID OF HER, Geek used her as a mean to satiate his âsexualâ discovery and to increase his status.
Why am I saying itâs rape culture? Because itâs an apology of rape. What weâre watching IS rape, but itâs portrayed in a way that we are supposed to feel like Caroline earned it. Yeah she threw a party and got drunk. But is it her fault if people- more importantly people she trusted decided to abuse her ? Oh and she threw a party at Jakeâs house so weâre supposed to feel bad for him? Dude, wtf, I guess I was unable to feel any sympathy towards him since the beginning of the movie but: the dude is an asshole, period.
2. Racism and Xenophobia.
Long Duk Dong, is supposed to be an Asian foreign student who stays with Samanthaâs (the lead role) grandparents. And obviously since itâs the 80âs, he has an accent, canât talk english properly and is a walking stereotype. It even seems like he is only there to be a stereotype, with him only being mentioned for his only caracteristic of being âasianâ âchineseâ, he is also a little bit stupid, getâs into a really weird relationship, he is not serious at all⊠but moreover, I think the worst part is how everyone treats him, every time the character is on screen he is mocked, kicked, insulted or he hurts himself.
And I get that this is the 80âs, I am not stupid, I know that people didnât call out racism publicly on a daily basis as much as we do today but I just canât get how THIS MOVIE of all getâs so much attention that I still hear people calling it an âamazing movieâ today. This comes from someone that kind of liked Trading Places.
Plus, they call Ginnyâs husband a âbohunkâ never really mentionning her name, even insisting on how deplorable it is that he is a âbohunkâ and I get that this could be considered as satire, but to me something is satirical only if it is used as a way to call out certain behaviours - for example, if a woman is pursued for having an abortion, and someone says that, had she been a rapist or a molester, she would have more chances to get out of court unscathed (youâre mocking the system, not the person, feel me?)- plus, in this situation, the xenophobia just adds to the long list of problematic behaviours in this movie.
3. It lacks of compassion, of humanityâŠ
I mean itâs a romance, and I guess it!s interesting to put two characters against each other, I am not against but the whole drama about Jake having a girlfriend in the beginning was unnecessary. Tbh, it was bullshit. Samantha even says that Caroline is too âkindâ, and Iâm still trying to understand how in peopleâs mind the attention of a man can be so important that they are willing to disregard each otherâs qualities.
Yes, Samanthaâs love interest is Jake and itâs a problem because he is with Caroline, who seems perfect. But the sole fact that she is âin the wayâ makes her the antiheroe of the story, she is then portrayed as a bad person, and the audience gets revenge when so many bad things happen to her. The problem is that eventhough she is portrayed as an outcast, there is clearly no reason to justify that other than the fact that she âin the way of true loveâ or whatever the fck. We get that she parties and drinks a lot, but that is a personnal choice, other than that, thereâs nothing, no justification. She did nothing. The party? When she realised her boyfriend was not up for it, she went up to say that she was sorry, to what he slamned the door and hooked her hair in it. So, my opinion? Jake is the one we should be hating, he loses interest in her and acts like an asshole. Caroline needs compassion and I guess if I were to re-imagine the movie in our days I would stop comparing the girls and work on creating a real chemistry between the two love interests because there was none. I believed in this love story as much as I believed in my chances of validating my statistics class, not really.
So this was it, you have my opinion, I didnât like this movie one bit. I donât know why I wrote all of this since it is not that important, I just feel like people tend to talk about old movies without talking about whatâs problematic and itâs really not what should happen, Iâm not for Cancel Cuture but I feel like if we are to appreciate what the people before us created we should keep the conversation going. What shocks me the most with 16 candles is that Iâve heard so much about how good it was that I was actually prepared to enjoy it but, when I finally watched, everything was awful, I wasnât enjoying any moment out of it. Anyway, no oneâs going to read that but I said my piece.
7 notes
·
View notes
I am in fact not a communist. My bad y'all
Something Iâll never say out loud because Iâm a communist:
I love my bank manager, heâs kind and cheery, and has a great beard too and he seems to be happily married so Iâm really happy for him.
2 notes
·
View notes
I kind of agree with this
listen i like john mulaney as much as the rest of y'all but whenever i see some intense shit like âOMG HES THE ONLY SAFE MAN EVERâ it fills me with so much dread. like i know y'all are gonna turn on him for something dumb and im gonna have to see a hundred posts about how âHES LITERALLY THE WORST MAN TO EVER LIVEâ. y'all put celebrities on these massive pedestals and then when they inevitably fuck up, you call them names and harrass them. itâs insane.
39K notes
·
View notes
My son, while gazing up at the sky, asked me how stars die
âUsually an overdoseâ, I said
4K notes
·
View notes
People will spend hours watching "ending explained" videos and reading about how Ed, Edd, n Eddy is set in purgatory or some such barmy nonsense, but the moment you tell them a piece of media was motivated by racism or corporate interest in affecting public opinion or the Pentagon's funding suddenly you're reading too much into it.
69K notes
·
View notes