Lina Mercury hot underwater naked teen Lesbian experience for stepmom and stepdaughter Kinky Fight Club [Wrestling Hentai game] Ep.3 gay anal sex fight on the rooftop Skinny redhead with hairy pussy on webcam Anime Shemale Futa Naughty teen thief punished by a perverted LP officer BANGBROS - Super Necessary Latina Porn Compilation Cutie licks a fat pussy Big ass black whore rides hard cock in all positions incredible suck filipina

Lesbian Domination with Strapon Lesbian Christy Charming (aka Paula Shy), Gina Gerson, Kattie Gold my lovely stepsis masturbates with lovense dildo live JasonTerry Fucking Sarah Smith Fake Driving School Exam failure leads to hot sexy blonde car fuck Pillados en la discoteca Huge Swingers Fuck in Bedroom Big nippled latina pussy banged by white cock cum shot on belly Karlitaa mi perrita cachonda Big booty BBW Dicked down

How can becoming be anti-memory and memory?

  In A Thousand Plateaus, Deleuze and Guattari write that all acts of creation are transhistorical. They draw on Nietzsche’s Untimely Meditations to add to their concepts of creative lines of flight and becomings. “Nietzsche opposes history not to the eternal but to the subhistorical or superhistorical: the Untimely, which is another name for haecceity, becoming…” (296). I am intrigued and confused by how temporality and history work —or do not work— in this text. It seems that creative lines of flight can lead to haecceities and becomings which are transhistorical. But, does that mean that becomings are outside of linear time, or in a sort of perpetual present, or are they transhistorical in the sense that all of the points or lines of time converge to create a new temporality? D&G’s formulation of time, history, and becomings gets even more tangled since they say that all becomings are transhistorical (and related to anti-memory), but they also maintain that: “Wherever we used the word ‘memories’ we in the preceeding pages, we were wrong to do so; we meant to say ‘becoming,’ we were saying becoming” (294).

i hate nietzsche "superhistorical" just say you hate history. stop writing like that.

understood in terms of their native temporalities, in terms of superhistorical training time logged, they are ancient technologies. They are already older than the oldest human-made artifacts in terms of historical experiences (real or simulated) logged and digested.

Superhistory, Not Superintelligence

Ideas like “building a second brain” leverage this basic new potentiality in the human condition; our newfound ability to age faster than we can live, by using machines to do much of the superhistorical living for us

Superhistory, Not Superintelligence