#overclock3d | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

64bitgamer · 1 year

Text

0 notes

mobilemall · 2 years

Text

Nvidia benchmarks cast further doubt over RTX 4080 12GB GPU

Nvidia’s RTX 4080 GPU is available in two flavors, as you’re doubtless conscious, and Crew Inexperienced has simply offered some benchmarks that are a place to begin for illustrating the relative efficiency that these graphics playing cards will ship. As flagged up by Overclock3D (opens in new tab) (by way of VideoCardz (opens in new tab)), each the RTX 4080 16GB and the 12GB lower-tier mannequin…

View On WordPress

0 notes

digitalsaiz · 2 years

Link

0 notes

kellyroycekey · 3 years

Video

youtube

Case Labs going forward?

#CaseLabs Skunkworks SingularityComputers Overclock3d Jayztwocnets GamersNexus Hardwarecanucks SMA8 FractalDesigns Watercooling AnnoDominiBea

0 notes

dailytechnologynews · 4 years

Photo

Fractal Define 7 Compact Review (Overclock3D) https://ift.tt/2A4uDAi

#hardware #Computer #Technology #Tech #News

2 notes · View notes

taimoorzaheer · 3 years

Text

AMD Ryzen 5000 Series CPUs Are Receiving Price Cuts Across The Board Ahead Of The Intel Alder Lake-S Launch

In Overclock3D’s latest report, they have found that the prices of AMD Ryzen 5000 series processors are getting lower. The Zen3 based processors are more accessible than ever and the prices are falling below MSRP. Up To 18% Off On The AMD Ryzen 5000 Series Processor In the report, Overclock3D looks over the prices of the Ryzen 5000 series in the UK and compiled the new prices of the Ryzen…

View On WordPress

0 notes

famousruinsdeer · 3 years

Text

Процессоры AMD Ryzen 5000 начали заметно дешеветь в преддверии анонса Intel Alder Lake

New Post has been published on https://v-m-shop.ru/2021/09/07/protsessory-amd-ryzen-5000-nachali-zametno-deshevet-v-preddverii-anonsa-intel-alder-lake/

Процессоры AMD Ryzen 5000 начали заметно дешеветь в преддверии анонса Intel Alder Lake

07.09.2021 [14:11],

Николай Хижняк

В качестве упреждающего ответа на грядущий анонс процессоров Intel Core 12-го поколения, а также в рамках подготовки к выпуску своих собственных обновлённых процессоров на базе Zen 3 с технологией 3D V-Cache, компания AMD начала снижать цены на актуальные процессоры Ryzen 5000-й серии. Об этом сообщил портал Overclock3D.

Источник изображения: VideoCardz

По данным источника, в настоящий момент цены на процессоры Ryzen 5000 в Великобритании выглядят следующим образом:

AMD Ryzen 5 5600X — цена при запуске £289,99 — актуальная цена £245.99 (24 845 руб.);

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X — цена при запуске £428,99 — актуальная цена £354,79 (35 835 руб.);

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X — цена при запуске £529,99 — актуальная цена £450,00 (45 451 руб.);

AMD Ryzen 9 5950X — цена при запуске £749,99 — актуальная цена £718,88 (72 609 руб.).

Как пишет сайт VideoCardz, в США процессор Ryzen 9 5900X на самом деле продаётся чуть дороже рекомендованной цены. В крупных торговых сетях Amazon и Newegg процессор предлагается от 590 до 610 долларов. Однако стоимость остальных моделей серии Ryzen 5000 снизилась по всему миру. В настоящий момент в США процессоры подешевели в среднем до 12 %, в Великобритании — до 18 %, а в Европе — до 16 %.

Источник изображения: VideoCardz

На российском рынке тоже наблюдается снижение цен. Так, на сегодняшний день средняя стоимость Ryzen 5 5600X по данным «Яндекс.Маркета» составляет 25 148 руб. В августе она равнялась 26 276 руб. Ryzen 7 5800X оценивается сегодня в среднем в 34 120 руб. Месяцем ранее он стоил 36 915 руб. Чип Ryzen 9 5900X в сентябре подешевел до 48 044 руб. (51 212 руб. в августе), а модель Ryzen 9 5950X теперь стоит в среднем 71 280 руб. В августе флагманский процессор продавался в среднем на 5 тыс. рублей дороже.

Актуальная средняя цена Ryzen 5 5600X по данным «Яндекс.Маркет»

Актуальная средняя цена Ryzen 7 5800X по данным «Яндекс.Маркет»

Актуальная средняя цена Ryzen 9 5900X по данным «Яндекс.Маркет»

Актуальная средняя цена Ryzen 9 5950X по данным «Яндекс.Маркет»

В ближайшие месяцы компании Intel и AMD собираются представить новые поколения процессоров. Intel выпустит совершенно новую серию чипов Alder Lake на базе гибридной архитектуры из больших производительных и малых энергоэффективных ядер, AMD в свою очередь собирается обновить архитектуру Zen 3 и представить модели Ryzen с технологией 3D V-Cache. Её суть заключается в установке специального кристалла SRAM-памяти прямо поверх CCD-чиплета. Технология позволяет увеличить объём L3-кэша настольного процессора Ryzen вплоть до 192 Мбайт. Ко времени анонса новых чипов цены на актуальные модели процессоров Intel и AMD, весьма вероятно, снизятся ещё сильнее.

Источники:

VideoCardz

Overclock3D

Яндекс.Маркет

VMShop

0 notes

thenewsvideos · 5 years

Photo

Watch The whole computing world has been waiting with bated breath for AMD’s high-end graphics card – and it’s finally here. Although it’s not the Vega II launch that seemed all but certain, the Radeon VII looks like a stunner that may even beat the Nvidia GeForce RTX 2080. Featuring a whopping 16GB of video memory and a high boost clock of 1,800MHz, this looks like a very exciting graphics card from Team Red. Hang with us for a bit as we tell you everything you need to know about the AMD Radeon VII. Cut to the chase What is it? AMD’s latest high-end graphics cardWhen is it out? February 7, 2019 What will it cost? $699 (about £550, AU$980) AMD Radeon VII release date While we don't report on production numbers externally,” the statement reads, “we will have products available via AIB partners and AMD.com at launch of Feb. 7, and we expect Radeon VII supply to meet demand from gamers. AMD to Overclock3D AMD held a grand spectacle of a keynote at CES 2019, and its headlining announcemen.. video

#Games - #video -

#Games

0 notes

kaos-sverige · 4 years

Video

youtube

AMD Ryzen 3300X and 3100 CPU Review

Published on May 7, 2020

Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/tinytomlogan/ - TTL Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/tinytomlogan/ - TTL Twitter: https://twitter.com/tinytomlogan - OC3D Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/Overclock3D/ - OC3D Twitter: https://twitter.com/OC3D - OC3D Website: https://www.overclock3d.net/ - OC3D Forums: https://forum.overclock3d.net/index.php - RushKit TV: https://www.youtube.com/RushKit

0 notes

componentplanet · 4 years

Text

Blizzard Confirms WoW Subscriber Base Doubled After Classic Launched

I’m still working on my WoW leveling comparison between Retail and Classic (I know, I know, I KNOW), but there’s now hard evidence that a substantial group of people are logging into WoW to play a version of the game they enjoyed 15 years ago. One of the most common arguments I saw people making before Classic launched — an argument I had a lot of fun discussing with friends, though I didn’t necessarily put a lot of stock in it — was the idea that people would roll Classic characters, immediately encounter the difficulty and pace of the game, and promptly quit again.

Turns out, nobody should’ve worried. Classic is popular enough to have doubled the number of people paying for an active WoW subscription. That’s according to data in Blizzard’s Q4 2019 report, which stated that the number of players paying for a month or more of service has doubled since Classic launched in mid-2019. Hat tip to Overclock3D, which initially broke the story.

The funny thing about the Classic / Retail debate was the players on the Retail side of the community who were certain Classic would be filled with people doing nothing but complaining about how difficult the game was. I’d lie if I said I hadn’t seen complaints. I’ve done some of the complaining, in point of fact. The game is sometimes infuriating. It can be difficult to find enough quests to level easily. Some of the shortcomings of Blizzard’s original design are apparent above Lvl 30 in ways they weren’t in the original game.

With that said, I’m still playing, even if a lot of CPU and GPU review coverage from November – February basically sidetracked my testing. There’s a lot of good game in WoW Classic, which really isn’t surprising, considering it’s the game that got millions of people to play World of Warcraft. At the same time, though, I probably shouldn’t lean too hard on the strength of that argument. Just because a game has strong elements doesn’t mean it aged particularly well, or even that people are hungry to return once again to its content. The slideshow from our WoW leveling comparison (1-20) is embedded below:

The real question for WoW Classic, to me, is how the project can evolve from here. Blizzard will continue to roll out content updates for WoW Classic, but eventually all good things come to an end. Naxxramas is the last endgame raid, and while that’ll challenge mid-tier players who advanced into endgame content at a slower pace cough, it won’t keep everybody happy.

I can see a few different ways for Blizzard to handle this. One is not to handle it, and to offer Classic as exactly what it is — Classic WoW, no more, no less, with all of the content and limitations that implies. Another option is to develop “classic” implementations of previous WoW expansions and offer Classic players the option to clone an existing hero on a BC server, move a hero from one to the other (with no option to transfer back), or roll fresh and face leveling from 1-70 under TBC rules. I suspect we’d get the first or second option, not the third, but they’re all possible.

But there’s another path that Blizz might take: Further content development for vanilla WoW.

Remember — original WoW had a lot of content visible on the map that was never used. The entire zone of Mount Hyjal is one example. We knew Gilneas existed behind the Graymane Wall, even if we didn’t get to visit the land. We’d been to Tol Barad and Grim Batol in Warcraft 2. Karazhan may not be an instance in Classic, but it exists in Classic. Even if Blizzard confined itself to the lore of Warcraft as it existed in 2004, there are a great many locations we never explored or visited. There’s no reason why new 5-man or raid content couldn’t be added to the existing game.

There’s a specific reason why I can imagine Blizzard going this route — it would allow the company to revisit “What if” scenarios in a timeline where the Dark Portal never re-opened, and the world of Azeroth went on much as it had before. Even if the Draenei never crashed on Azeroth, Arthas would still have eventually reappeared. The Twilight’s Hammer cult was very much present in the later events of vanilla WoW. There are ways and places where Blizzard could expand the lore of Classic with new 5-man dungeons and content adapted to a universe in which things happened very differently (and, presumably, we remain locked at Lvl 60 and with whatever patch version Blizzard stops with).

I’m a lot more interested in Classic’s evolution than one can typically say about a 15 year-old title, even if my playtime has been a bit lacking.

Now Read:

World of Warcraft Classic vs. Retail, Part 1: Which Early Game Plays Better?

Warcraft 3: Reforged Is So Unpopular, Blizzard Is Giving Instant Refunds

Blizzard Lowers Penalty on Hong Kong Streamer, Says China Uninvolved in Censorship

from ExtremeTechExtremeTech https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/306104-blizzard-confirms-wow-subscriber-base-doubled-after-classic-launched from Blogger http://componentplanet.blogspot.com/2020/02/blizzard-confirms-wow-subscriber-base.html

#Blizzard Confirms WoW Subscriber Base Doubled After Classic Launched

0 notes

albonynet · 4 years

Text

مطوري The Last Of Us 2 يبدأون العمل على طور الاونلاين, و احتمالية صدورها على الحاسب كبيرة..!

[ad_1]

لعبة The Last Of Us 2 لا شك بأنها من اكثر العناوين المنتظرة هذا العام و على الرغم من تأجيل موعد اطلاقها الا انها ما زالت ستصدر في فترة النصف الاول من ��امنا الحالي, حسنا ماذا عن طور الاونلاين الذي اكد فريق التطوير الخاص باللعبة Naughty Dog انه لن يصدر مع اللعبة عندما يتم اطلاقها..!

بحسب موقع Overclock3dيوجد حاليا و في لحظة كتابة هذا الخبر شاغر وظيفي على موقع استديو Naughty Dog الالكتروني…

View On WordPress

0 notes

terryblount · 5 years

Text

First early details surface for AMD Zen 3 architecture, Zen 4 in design phase

AMD’s Martin Hilgeman has revealed some early details about the Zen 3 architecture at the HPC AI Advisory Council’s 2019 UK Conference. Moreover, Hilgeman confirmed that Zen 4 is currently in a design phase.

According to Hilgeman, Zen 3 server CPUs will release on AMD’s existing SP3 server socket, will support DDR4 memory and offer the same TDP. In addition, they will offer the same core count as the ROME server CPUs. Now while Hilgeman was talking only about the server processors, we can assume that the same will apply to the desktop processors too.

Hilgeman also confirmed that Zen 3 would move away from Zen/Zen 2’s split cache design. AMD’s previous Zen CPUs split the L3 cache between two quad-core CCXs. Theoretically, this could mean that Zen 3 may offer a larger, combine L3 cache. This could benefit the CPU from granting all CPU cores better cache access. Furthermore, AMD may also increase the cache capacity.

Again, in theory this could lower some internal CPU latencies, and allow Zen 3 processors to cache more data on-die. These changes could be beneficial for Zen 3’s gaming performance, given AMD’s existing marketing for “GameCache”, and its benefits for Zen 2.

Lastly, we can assume that AMD will further improve the IPC on Zen 3. After all, we already know that Intel aims to improve the IPC on its next-generation CPUs. As such, it will be interesting to see whether the red team will be able to further close its gap.

Kudos to our reader ‘Metal Messiah’ for bringing this to our attention.

Thanks Overclock3D

The post First early details surface for AMD Zen 3 architecture, Zen 4 in design phase appeared first on DSOGaming.

First early details surface for AMD Zen 3 architecture, Zen 4 in design phase published first on https://touchgen.tumblr.com/

0 notes

overclock3d-jeeps-blog · 6 years

Photo

New Post has been published at https://O3Djeeps.com!

Part One: Team Tech Offroad Rubicon Swaybar Conversion Kit with TTO Disconnect and JKS Rubicon Links

🔔 Please CLICK THE BELL if you want to see my videos! 🔔 In this video I am installing a complete Team Tech Offroad Rubicon Swaybar with TTO Pneumatic Conversion Kit! What does this mean? Well, I’m putting an air activated disconnecting swaybar in my Jeep! Check it out. ** I have no ide...

Read more and see the video at https://o3djeeps.com/part-one-team-tech-offroad-rubicon-swaybar-conversion-kit-with-tto-disconnect-and-jks-rubicon-links/

0 notes

ultragamerz · 5 years

Text

AMD Radeon VII graphics to bring maximum performance for hardcore enthusiast gamers, AMD Says

New Post has been published on https://www.ultragamerz.com/amd-radeon-vii-graphics-to-bring-maximum-performance-for-hardcore-enthusiast-gamers-amd-says/

AMD Radeon VII graphics to bring maximum performance for hardcore enthusiast gamers, AMD Says

youtube

AMD Radeon™ VII graphics brings maximum performance for hardcore enthusiast gamers, delivering incredible, ultra-smooth gaming experiences at consistently high FPS, in 1440p, ultrawide and 4K resolutions. Dominate your games and shatter records with the world’s first 7nm gaming GPU, future-ready and built to meet the demands of high-performance gameplay.

Discover more: http://www.amd.com/radeonvii

AMD Radeon VII featuring 7nm Vega architecture comes with 3840 Stream Processors, which means that the GPU does not have all cores enabled. AMD may be still planning to introduce the full GPU for gaming, we simply don’t know yet. What we have learned from AMD presentation is that 7nm 331 mm2 GPU will compete against 12nm 545 mm2 processor from NVIDIA.

AMD Radeon VII will not probably compete with TITAN RTX, it will not probably compete with RTX 2080 Ti either. Instead, AMD is focusing on GeForce RTX 2080, the 8GB GDDR6 replacement for GeForce GTX 1080 Ti. AMD solution features about twice as much memory (16 vs 8GB), which is also twice as fast (1 TB/s vs 0.45 TB/s). It does not have Tensor Cores or RT Cores equivalent but is this really that important considering how few games support DXR?

We have no way of knowing how power efficient 7nm Vega really is, this will be verified by independent reviews as they drop around February 7th.

AMD also released more gaming performance benchmarks (source: Overclock3D):

Tags:

7nm Navi GPU, Amd, AMD vs nvidia, CES 2019, entertainment, Naiv Leaks, News, Nvidia, Pc Gaming, Pc hardware, technology, video games, ultragamerz

#7nm Navi GPU #Amd #AMD vs nvidia #CES 2019 #entertainment #Naiv Leaks #News #Nvidia #Pc Gaming #Pc hardware #technology #ultragamerz #video games #AMD #Gaming News #Technology

0 notes

dailytechnologynews · 5 years

Photo

Intel's "Real World" Benchmarking: SYSmark 2018 is (far) more in favor of Intel - as Cinebench is in favor of AMD

According to PCGamesN, Intel speaks with the press (and probably with it's OEM partners) about "real world" benchmarking and providing "Real Usage Guidelines" (RUG) for that. XFastest (Google-translated to english) showing some of the Intel "Real Usage Guidelines" presentation slides, mostly interesting is slide #17. Within this presentation, Intel promote "SYSmark 2018" as the best benchmark to test application performance, because SYSmark include some widely used programs like Office & Adobe software. Intel claims as well a performance advantage for Core i7-9700K (+3%) and Core i9-9900K (+7%) over Ryzen 9 3900X at the SYSmark 2018, called it a benchmark win at application performance. On the other side, Intel dismiss the Cinebench benchmark as too much in favor of AMD's CPUs, calling the Cinebench results as outliers in review of other benchmarks.

As we have a bunch of independent benchmarks from the Ryzen 3000 launch, it's easy to check Intel's claims. First, I created an application performance index without any of the rendering software, i.e. without of 3D Studio, Blender, Cinebench, Corona, FryBench, Indigo, KeyShot, LuxMark, PCMark rendering test, POV-Ray & V-Ray. The new index include mostly office, browser, packer and encoding software. On the left side of the following table you see the original index (including the results from rendering benchmarks), on the right side of the table the new index without any of the rendering benchmark. The base (100%) for all results is the Ryzen 9 3900X, so you can compare it to Intel's claims:

.

Core i7-9700K Core i9-9900K Tests . Tests Core i7-9700K Core i9-9900K 70.6% 78.9% (19) AnandTech (15) 76.2% 81.2% - 72.6% (9) ComputerBase (5) - 72.8% 65.4% 76.5% (12) Cowcotland (10) 68.4% 77.8% 64.6% 70.5% (7) Golem (5) 73.7% 75.0% 59.2% 73.7% (13) Guru3D (8) 64.4% 74.3% 70.9% 76.2% (14) Hardware.info (12) 74.7% 77.5% 54.3% 72.1% (10) Hardwareluxx (6) 56.7% 72.4% - 81.7% (8) Hot Hardware (5) - 85.9% 54.5% 74.7% (9) Lab501 (5) 54.8% 75.6% - 81.2% (13) LanOC (9) - 85.6% 49.9% 62.1% (16) Le Comptoir d.H. (13) 51.2% 62.7% 57.9% 70.3% (7) Overclock3D (5) 61.8% 74.7% 65.3% 75.3% (18) PCLab (14) 69.9% 77.5% 56.1% 71.0% (8) SweClockers (6) 59.5% 74.3% 73.6% 84.5% (29) TechPowerUp (25) 79.7% 89.0% 53.8% 74.6% (8) TechSpot (4) 56.4% 77.3% - 82.6% (17) The Tech Report (12) - 87.0% 71.2% 82.6% (25) Tom's Hardware (18) 78.6% 85.3% 63.8% 76.6% Ø13.4 Performance Index Ø9.8 69.5% 79.5% -36.2% or +56.8% -23.4% or +30.5% Difference to 3900X -30.5% or +43.9% -20.5% or +25.8%

.

You can easily see that removing the rendering benchmarks change not much. Yes, the rendering software is in favor of AMD, but the results from all other tests are not so different. Core i7-9700K and Core i9-9900K are still far away from the performance level of Ryzen 9 3900X at applications. Not a single review claims a performance advantage for Core i7-9700K and/or Core i9-9900K over Ryzen 9 3900X at application performance. In fact, even without rendering benchmarks, every single review still see a huge performance advantage for the Ryzen 9 3900X at application performance.

Intel's SYSmark 2018 results showing some very much different results, so as second I investigate the deviation of SYSmark's and Cinebench's results from the new performance index without any rendering software. To use this new index is clearly in favor of Intel, because usually you would use the original index with all the test results for any performance consideration. But in this case, only the deviation from the index without SYSmark and without Cinebench (or other rendering software) is in the point of view. The base (100%) for all results is still the Ryzen 9 3900X, the deviation of SYSmark and Cinebench to the overall application performance index is noted as "percent point" instead of percent (higher percent points means a higher deviation from the overall application performance index):

.

. Overall Cinebench R20 (M) (deviation) SYSmark 2018 (deviation) Core i9-9900K 76.6% 62.1% 23 percent points 107% 40 percent points Core i7-9700K 63.8% 48.9% 31 percent points 103% 61 percent points

.

This is the second clear result: SYSMark 2018 differs far more from the overall application performance index (without rendering software) than Cinebench. If Cinebench is called for "in favor of AMD", then the SYSmark should be called as "far more in favor of Intel". Beside this, it's a bit of a surprising result for the SYSmark, because the benchmark includes many tests based of different office software und should tend more nearer to any performance index than a benchmark like Cinebench with the single purpose to show the rendering performance. Like it or not: Cinebench is (clearly) nearer on the overall application performance of these CPUs than Intel's preferred SYSmark.

.

PS: If someone want to create an info graphics based on these numbers, please feel free to do so. I'm not so the graphics guy.

Source: This is a short version of an article from my german website 3DCenter.org

#hardware #Computer #Technology #Tech #News

3 notes · View notes

overcluster · 6 years

Text

El motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk se filtra en Amazon

Según publica Overclock3d, se ha podido ver en la web de Amazon Estados Unidos la placa madre MSI B450 Tomahawk. La nueva motherboard de MSI para el chipset B450 había sido presentada en el marco de la Computex 2018.

Contra la B350 Tomahawk este mother se sumaron dos puertos Sata III, se cambió la posición del puerto M.2, y se…

View On WordPress

#AMD #MSI #Principal

0 notes