Tumgik
#fa sci na ting
fjordfolk · 2 years
Text
people who drone about biologically appropriate dog diets and feeding your pet what they've evolved to eat, but who also clutch their pearls when dog food contains animal byproducts
164 notes · View notes
zacksnydered · 6 months
Text
GENUINELY don't know how accurate it is because as a non american and non white, most of my female and male friends love sucker punch and have literally never met anyone here that vehemently hates it but on the internet the loudest people are white women????
9 notes · View notes
cosmicmoved · 3 years
Text
>> A STARTER FROM SHO TSUKIDATE FOR CLAY PARK  ( @lozarus​ )
Tumblr media Tumblr media
                 “ Fa-sci-na-ting. ” Each syllable is dropped like a weight, bouncing rhythmical off the top of his tongue. “ You’re like a whole case by yourself. That’s not a weird thing for me to say, trust me. I overanalyse people who have nothing to do with me for a living. I like you. ”
2 notes · View notes
calloftheancestors · 4 years
Text
To America, From a Worried European Friend
A country convinced that it is irredeemably racist can’t lead the world as the ‘indispensable nation.’
By Daniel Schwammenthal.............Brussels
His­tory and evo­lu­tion­ary bi­ol­ogy teach us that the nor­mal course of hu­man af­fairs is trib­al­ism, op­pres­sion and poverty. The emer­gence of lib­eral democ­ra­cies isn’t the in­evitable end­point of sup­pos­edly lin­ear West­ern progress but an aber­ra­tion—and a rather frag­ile one at that.
This is why the ris­ing il­lib­er­al­ism in the U.S. is so trou­bling. Ac­tivists who seem to un­der­stand George Or­well’s “1984” not as a warn­ing but as a man­ual see free speech—the lifeblood of democ­racy and hu­man bet­ter­ment—as a fas­cist tool of op­pres­sion. Other clas­si­cal lib­eral ideals—a col­or­blind so­ci­ety, ra­tio­nal dis­course, the sci­en­tific method—suf­fer the same fate.
These un­en­light­ened views have spread with light­ning speed. Once con­fined to the cam­puses of the na­tion’s elite uni­ver­si­ties, they have moved into the main­stream of pub­lic dis­course. Amer­i­ca’s fu­ture lead­ers have been spoon-fed two the­o­ries born of Marx­ism. One is post­mod­ernism, so called be­cause it re­jects the lib­eral ideas of moder­nity and the very no­tion of ob­jec­tive truth. The other is crit­i­cal the­ory, which is pre­oc­cu­pied with un­cov­er­ing hid­den power struc­tures that have sup­pos­edly stood in the way of a com­mu­nist rev­o­lu­tion.
These once-fringe the­o­ries have given rise to qua­sire­li­gious dog­mas that di­vide so­ci­ety into hi­er­ar­chies of op­pres­sor and op­pressed, set­ting the stage for eter­nal so­ci­etal strife. In this new cult, dis­sent or in­suf­fi­cient fer­vor is in­ter­preted both as val­i­da­tion of the doc­trine of ubiq­ui­tous racism and a pun­ish­able thought crime. As in me­dieval witch hunts, both de­nial and forced con­fes­sions prove the de­fen­dant’s guilt.
On the other end of the po­lit­i­cal spec­trum we find right-wing pop­ulism, which imag­ines “pure peo­ple” tak­ing on a cor­rupt elite, and of course the far right, with its Nazi in­fat­u­a­tion. The wide avail­abil­ity of guns in the U.S. isn’t only a sub­ject of dis­pute in the un­fold­ing cul­ture war but could help turn it deadly. Wit­ness the re­cent syn­a­gogue shoot­ings by real white su­prema­cists. Anti-Semi­tism and anti-Zion­ism are ob­ses­sions shared by the far left and the far right. Amer­ica is headed for un­prece­dented po­lar­iza­tion and pos­si­bly civil un­rest.
But why am I, a Ger­man Jew liv­ing in Brus­sels, so wor­ried about U.S. do­mes­tic af­fairs? As the adage goes, when Amer­ica sneezes, the rest of the world catches a cold. Right now Amer­ica has pneu­mo­nia.
I learned to cher­ish the U.S. long be­fore I had the priv­i­lege to live and study there. His­tory can be very per­sonal. What Madeleine Al­bright called the “in­dis­pens-able na­tion” meant the dif­fer­ence be­tween life and death for my fam­ily. I was brought up in the firm knowl­edge that had it not been for those unimag­in­ably brave Amer­i­can boys storm­ing the beaches of Nor­mandy, I wouldn’t have been born, and my par­ents and the rest of my peo­ple would have been ex­tin­guished. No doubt I’m leav­ing out en­tire li­braries of nu­ance, but that is the quin­tessential truth.
Amer­ica to­day is what it has al­ways been: a flawed so­ci­ety, like all oth­ers, but also a unique force for good in the world. No other mul­ti­eth­nic, mul­tire­li­gious so­ci­ety can cred­i­bly claim to be more de­mo­c­ra­tic, more pros­per­ous and more just than the U.S.
But Amer­ica can’t re­main the leader of the free world if it is it­self no longer free. To be the guar­an­tor of West­ern se­cu­rity re­quires mil­i­tary and eco­nomic power, but also a sense of mis­sion. And right now Amer­i­cans are com­mit­ting mass char­ac­ter sui­cide. If the coun­try goes be­yond ac­knowl­edg­ing that racism and in­equal­ity per­sist and must be fought, and in­stead con­vinces it­self that it’s in­her­ently and ir­re­deemably racist, it can’t pos­si­bly con­tinue to be­lieve that it has any right to lead. Such an Amer­ica would re­ject the no­tion that the West is worth de­fend­ing and re­gard Eu­rope as also in­her­ently op­pres­sive. We know who will fill the vac­uum left by an Amer­ica in re­treat and at war with it­self. As they watch Amer­i­ca’s self-im­mo­la­tion, lead­ers in Mos­cow, Bei­jing and Tehran surely can’t be­lieve their luck.
Any func­tion­ing so­ci­ety must ex­tend tribal loy­alty be­yond the ties of blood. Eth­nic­ity and Chris­tian­ity were the glue that helped hold the more ho­moge­nous Eu­ropean na­tion states to­gether. Amer­i­ca’s Found­ing Fa­thers laid the foun­da­tion of a so­ci­ety wor­thy of the motto “e pluribus unum”—out of many, one—by re­plac­ing eth­nic and re­li­gious loy­al­ties with lib­eral ideas and deist ideals. A shared loy­alty to the De­c­la­ra­tion of In­de­pen­dence and the Con­sti­tu­tion al­lows Amer­i­cans to see each other not as strangers but as fel­low cit­i­zens.
Yes, the U.S. has not al­ways lived up to its ideals. But to claim that the Found­ing’s “prom­issory note” was never any­thing but a scam to main­tain a sys­tem of white op­pres­sion is ahis­tor­i­cal re­vi­sion­ism that will erode the coun­try’s foun­da­tion.
Eu­ropean anti-Amer­i­can­ism con­stantly imag­ines the rise of fas­cism in the very coun­try that de­feated the real thing and con­stantly pre­dicts the end of lib­erty in the world’s old­est democ­racy. I have al­ways proudly op­posed this view. But I am re­minded now of Ben­jamin Frank­lin’s fa­mous line: “A Re­pub­lic, if you can keep it.” For the first time I have ter­ri­fy­ing doubts.
4 notes · View notes