Tumgik
#calling things like quilting 'crafts' instead of art is more complicated than misogyny
pearl-kite · 2 years
Text
I think I've rambled about this before but I can't find it (because of course I can't, it's tumblr)
Sometimes you see people talking about how things like quilting and embroidery, things called crafts, are considered either a lesser or alternate form of art, if they're called art at all. I think I've seen people call this a form of misogyny, because it always seems to be the arts done by women in a household.
And that could definitely be a part of it, but it also just goes to linguistics itself.
The word for art in Old English is cræftas. So craft IS art.
In 1066, William the Conqueror rode up into England from Normandy, which spoke an old form of French.
When you get two cultures now forced together like that, language evolves. Speakers begin taking the Germanic roots of Old English and the Romantic roots of French to create a new (more terrible and obnoxious) form of English - Middle English.
Now, the upper class consists of the conquerors who speak more French and locals who learn it to fit in and keep their power. That form of French becomes the language of the elite. Those that can't afford the time or money to learn it stick with the more Germanic roots of Old English.
But they share ideas, and suddenly you have two ways to say the same thing: sheep and mouton, cow and bœuf, pig and porc. Not just food, either: a cordial reception and a hearty welcome.
arts and cræftas
It's not only that 'crafts' are a thing done predominantly by women, it's that quilt-making and weaving are things done by the working class, the people who would call it cræftas. Meanwhile, sculpture and painting are things done by those who can afford the time or money to do so, the ones who would call them arts.
Anyway, etymology is cool, linguistics is cool, language affects us more than we realize, that's all
21 notes · View notes