HAPPY PRIDE MONTH! :] Initially I just wanted to do a small drawing with colours picked from the aroace and bigender flags, but I kept adding little details and it ended up taking several hours longer than I thought it would. I'm very happy with the result though! (my hand is not...)

I saved an image of the background by itself, since unfortunately some little details ended up getting obscured, you can find it under the cut (+ a sketch I didn't use)

I'm actually quite proud the little crewmate portraits + The Ruin down at the bottom, too bad they got cut off lol

CHEVALIER ROYALS (playoffs edition)

🪤 MOUSE TRAP - what will always lure them into certain danger? a loved one in danger? a promise of something they are always searching for?

For Andre

𝐎𝐂 𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐉𝐈 𝐀𝐒𝐊𝐒! | Accepting

Honestly, 100% cliché answer, but anyone innocent in danger. Not even a loved one, but any kind of hostage situation with bystanders. He'd be less inclined if it was a corrupt person who might be getting what's coming to them, though.

But he's pretty good at handling himself with his abilities, so there is that.

one might say they did playful banter

5.10.23

Noodle faces from The Gorillaz Artbook

we are witnessing a nepo baby using his privileges

I will love you until my dying day! Come what may!

🎥: @starcuffedjeans

i thought b99 was trending b/c of an anniversary or something happy. wtf 😭

Return of the Living Dead III (1993)

"What's going on, Curt, tell me what happened?"

"We had an accident."

"What kind of an accident?"

"On the bike."

"What happened?"

"You died."

"I what?"

It's Printed Matter's New York Art Book Fair this weekend, so I've decided to publish a new project, Untitled (Grave Matters), which is a set of screenshots of art historian Anna C. Chave's devastating lecture on Carl Andre, which she delivered at the symposium linked to Dia's 2014 Andre retrospective.

Though she discussed them at length, Andre refused to let Chave publish images of two macabre works he made after he was acquitted for the murder of his wife Ana Mendieta. Untitled (Grave Matters) fixes that.

During NYABF, drop me an email, and I'll send you a signed and stamped edition. After that, we'll see.

Status: Open Character Andre Rios Hernandez Setting: Streets of Chicago Verse: Main

The sound of an arrow whizzing through the air and landing with a thud between bricks. A warning shot to get attention. Standing where the arrow had come from was a auburn haired man, dressed in a dark green suit with a mask framing completely green eyes.

"What are you doing here? This isn't your usual stomping grounds," Straight Shot said. If something was going to happen in his little corner of the world, he wanted to know about it and know it now.

He had noticed some shifting about in the local warehouses; not the usual lot of people. And to say his interest was piqued was an understatement.

You Can Find The Instrumental Version -> Here <-

SWTOR + Class First Appearances

On Friday, April 28, 2023, the plaintiffs filed their trial brief (Doc. 199) with over 350 attached exhibits containing information about the AHCA’s anti-trans rulemaking process that was not previously known to the public. This evidence confirms early coordination between the office of Governor Ron DeSantis, the Florida Department of Health, and the AHCA at meetings in early April 2022 (Doc. 200-5). AHCA chief litigation counsel Andrew T. Sheeran, was even seeking out anti-trans expert witnesses, including Quentin Van Meter (Pl. 337) and anti-gay conversion therapy provider Miriam Grossman (Pl. 274), prior to FLDOH’s April 20, 2022 anti-trans press release. A series of diagrams dated to June 2022 describe a “Gender Dysphoria/Transgender Health Care Policy Pathway” (Plaintiffs’ trial exhibit 296), “Non-Legislative Pathway” (Pl. 295), and “Projected Rulemaking Timeline” (Pl. 294), beginning with state surgeon general Joseph Ladapo’s April anti-trans guidance and ending in June-September 2022 with “Care Effectively Banned”. This indicates that the AHCA had not initiated an open-ended assessment of evidence on certain medical treatments with the possibility that this evidence could be persuasively robust, but rather that this exclusion was already decided at the outset. Jeffrey English, AHCA’s “GAPMS guy”, called the finding “a conclusion in search of an argument” (Doc. 199).

Read more at Gender Analysis