#a dearth of cishet characters is NOT the issue here | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

sword-dad-fukuzawa · 3 years

Text

So, this post. I'm genuinely tearing up over it.

I don't quite know how to articulate why but I'm going to do my best because I think it's important. I'm going to be rambling (venting?) about LGBTQ+ issues, POC issues, and fandom. All that will be under the cut.

This is...vastly more personal than the stuff I usually talk about. Keep that in mind, please, along with how I don't mean to shit on any individual by discussing my own experience.

As a bisexual Asian person (specifically Pinoy) there's not a lot of representation out there for me. Even just as a bi person.

I'm happy about Loki from Marvel, obviously, but I've never been big on the MCU. I love and adore Laurent Thierry (be gay do crime dammit), but I'm not big on The Great Pretender either and it doesn't seem to get confirmed in-universe. I'm also not a Steven Universe or She-Ra fan--they're just very much not my type of show. Jesper Fahey came very close but he's specifically stated to be pansexual, which is its own, distinct thing from bisexuality, and he's also not from Six of Crows' fantasy Asia. And god knows anime as a whole doesn't really do anything beyond the heteronormative.

I guess you could say I'm picky about my representation. I've spent a long time resigning myself to the fact that I will never see a character I can identify with in major media, at least not in their entirety.

And it's...pretty hard to see myself represented in the LGBTQ+ community in the mainstream, either.

Mainstream LGBTQ+ is predominantly white. The prevailing message of what "bisexual" is, at least for afab folks, is "I'm attracted to every woman and like, two men!" which, yeah, is valid, that's the whole point--multisexuality comes with gender preferences half the time. And there's a whole bunch of stuff attached to the new bisexual stereotype (clear phone cases, cuffed jeans, big eyeliner, plus some other nonsense).

[Don't even get me started on how the nonbinary "ideal" has gotten to become "thin, afab, white, and androgynously dressed" because that's only tangentially related, but I'm mad about it. I hadn't wished I was white in years until I caught myself mourning how I'd never look like The Ideal. Fucking stereotypes ruining my track record of self love.]

None of that is me. I'm a POC who skews a lot closer to the "attraction to men" side of the scale. I'm kind of out of touch with the stereotypes within the community and the ones outside the community are fucking gross.

Does this make me any less a bisexual POC?

No! Obviously not!

It's still frustrating.

On top of that, bisexual representation in media is shit. It's shit, as it is with any marginalized identity, but god it's just so shit that I didn't think there was a single character in media that I related to.

And then came Wei Wuxian.

He's loud and he takes up space and he's opinionated. He uses NSFW humor for shock value. He's passionate about shit that other people think is weird. He fucks up a lot.

And he's bi, with a preference for the opposite gender, and I'm tearing up again just thinking about it.

Here's a character who's like me.

We're Asian. We're bi. We've got similar neuroses. I don't know how the hell to articulate how fucking much it meant to me to see a character like this, who is so similar to me, and see him be a part of popular media.

I don't know how I can possibly articulate what it's like, being a POC and LGBTQ+ and growing up like that, with a dearth of anyone in mainstream media that I could relate to. How do I talk about what it's like, knowing my straight friends have no shortage of comfort characters? Knowing my white friends have no shortage of comfort characters? And being quietly furious about this for years, but anger is effort and anger is painful to hold on to, and so settling into a sort of tired resignation.

And here's the thing. There are definitely still people out there like me who are still suffering through a dearth of comfort media. A dearth of media that sees them, pats them on the shoulder, and tells them that hey, stories about people like you are worth reading. A dearth of media that says they have lives just as interesting and compelling as someone white and cishet.

I'm one of the lucky ones.

And that boggles my fucking mind, that I'm lucky to only be a teenager when I read about Wei Wuxian and for the first time, felt like I existed in the eyes of popular fandom.

I don't know how to end this, so I'll just say that representation fucking matters. And it's near-impossible to articulate why it matters, to articulate the deep frustration of growing up without it, and so I see a lot of people dismiss how important it is. I'll just go back to sobbing over Wei Wuxian wearing ribbons in the colors of the bi flag now.

#wei wuxian #mo dao zu shi #mdzs #/srs #/gen #representation matters

5 notes · View notes

nothingman · 7 years

Link

A few days ago a discussion and subsequent interview with David Gabriel, Marvel Comics’ Senior VP of Sales and Marketing, at their retailer summit began making the rounds, but not for the reasons the publisher was hoping. Marvel has every reason to be concerned, as their share of the market has shrunk dramatically in the last few months. Figuring out the cause of that decrease is vital for Marvel’s survival—yet the answer they’ve come to isn’t just inaccurate, it’s also offensive.

Later, Gabriel gave another interview that, in part, rehashed that hoary old proverb that diversity doesn’t sell: “What we heard was that people didn’t want any more diversity. They didn’t want female characters out there. That’s what we heard, whether we believe that or not. I don’t know that that’s really true, but that’s what we saw in sales. We saw the sales of any character that was diverse, any character that was new, our female characters, anything that was not a core Marvel character, people were turning their nose up against.” And with that, comics Twitter was all a-tizzy.

The stated goal of the summit was “to hear directly from [retailers] on what they are encountering within the industry and how Marvel can work with them to make sure they know that we hear them.” This summit was only open to cherry-picked retailers and Marvel offered no means of communication to those not attending, all of which puts the whole event—and the assumptions being made as a result—into question. Although the conclusions drawn by the summit can’t be totally dismissed, they also shouldn’t be used as the foundation of a whole new business model, either. Unfortunately, though, Marvel doesn’t seem to agree.

Disregarding the sugarcoated PR update Marvel made praising diverse fan favorites, Gabriel’s comments are so patently false that, without even thinking about it, I could name a dozen current titles across mediums that instantly disprove his reasoning. With its $150 million and counting in domestic earnings, Get Out is now the highest grossing original screenplay by a debut writer/director in history; meanwhile, The Great Wall, Ghost in the Shell, Gods of Egypt, and nearly every other recent whitewashed Hollywood blockbuster has tanked. Even sticking strictly to comics, Black Panther #1 was Marvel’s highest selling solo comic of 2016. Before Civil War II, Marvel held seven of the top ten bestselling titles, three of which (Gwenpool, Black Panther, and Poe Dameron) were “diverse.” Take that, diversity naysayers.

No, the crux of the problem with Marvel’s sales isn’t diversity; the problem is Marvel itself.

Old Guard versus the New Wave

Comic book fans generally come in two flavors: the old school and the new. The hardcore traditionalist dudes (and they’re almost always white cishet men) are whinging in comic shops saying things like, “I don’t want you guys doing that stuff…One of my customers even said…he wants to get stories and doesn’t mind a message, but he doesn’t want to be beaten over the head with these things.” Then there are the modern geeks, the ones happy to take the classics alongside the contemporary and ready to welcome newbies into the fold. I’ve walked out of at least a dozen shops run by guys like that gatekeeping retailer, and yet I regularly commute across two counties just to spend my money at a shop that treats me like a person instead of a unicorn or fake geek girl (Hera help me, I hate that term). I should also point out that these old school fans aren’t even all that old school: until about the 1960s, when comics moved into specialty shops, women read comics as voraciously as men. Tradition has a very short term memory, it seems.

This gets to the point made by a woman retailer at the summit: “I think the mega question is, what customer do you want. Because your customer may be very different from my customer, and that’s the biggest problem in the industry is getting the balance of keeping the people who’ve been there for 40 years, and then getting new people in who have completely different ideas.” I’d argue there’s a customer between those extremes, one who follows beloved writers and artists across series and publishers and who places as much worth on who is telling the story as who the story is about. This is where I live, and there are plenty of other people here with me.

Blaming readers for not buying diverse comics despite the clamor for more is a false narrative. Many of the fans attracted to “diverse” titles are newbies and engage in comics very differently from longtime fans. For a variety of reasons, they tend to wait for the trades or buy digital issues rather than print. The latter is especially true for young adults who generally share digital (and yes, often pirated) issues. Yet the comics industry derives all of its value from how many print issues Diamond Distributors shipped to stores, not from how many issues, trades, or digital copies were actually purchased by readers. Every comics publisher is struggling to walk that customer-centric tightrope, but only Marvel is dumb enough to shoot themselves in the foot, then blame the rope for their fall.

Stifling the Talent

As mentioned earlier, it’s not just the characters comics fans follow around, but writers and artists, as well. Marvel doesn’t seem to think readers care all that much about artists versus writers, but I’ve picked up a ton of titles based on artwork alone that I wouldn’t normally read. Likewise, I’ve dropped or rejected series based on whether or not I like an artist. Even with the lure of Saladin Ahmed as writer, my interest in Black Bolt was strictly trade. The main reason I switched to wanting print issues? Christian Ward. Veronica Fish single-handedly kept me on issues after Fiona Staples left Archie, and her leaving is the main reason why I dropped down to trades. I’ll follow Brittney L. Williams wherever she goes, regardless of series or publisher.

So why then does Marvel think that “it’s harder to pop artists these days”? A lot of it has to do with the dearth of decent advertising (especially outside comics shops) and a lack of institutional support for those artists. Also, scattering artists from book to book before they can establish a presence on a title, turning creative feats into flashbang one-offs with little continuity, is a grave Marvel has dug for itself.

But we also have to talk about how publishers don’t let their artists talk freely about their projects. Social media contracts often make it impossible for creators to address audience concerns, as Gail Simone points out, and change the way they interact with their fans. The more the Big Two seek to control expression and discussion, both on the page and online, the more they drive creators to small presses, indie publishers, and self/web publishing. A tangential arm of this conversation is how craptacular the pay is for freelance comics creators and how publishers should be utterly ashamed of themselves. But that’s a topic for another day.

Oversaturation

There’s soooo much stuff. If longtime fans are drowning in options, think how newbies must feel staring at shelf after shelf after shelf of titles. CBR crunched the numbers and found that in a 16-month window from late 2015 to early 2017, Marvel launched 104 new superhero series. A quarter didn’t make it out of their second arc. How can anyone, especially new and/or broke readers, be expected to keep up with that? Moreover, with that many options on the table, it’s no wonder Marvel can’t establish a tentpole. They’ve diluted their own market.

At first blush, giving everyone what they want sounds good, but in practice it simply overwhelms. Right now there are two separate Captain America titles, one where Steve Rogers is a Hydra Nazi and one where Sam Wilson is an anti-SJW jerkwad. There are also two Spider-Mans, two Thors, and two Wolverines, one each for longtime fans and one for newer/diverse/casual fans. And the list goes on.

Adding a steady stream of events and crossovers isn’t helping matters. Event fatigue is a genuine problem, yet Marvel has two of ‘em lined up for 2017. Given the sales for Civil War II, I acknowledge that I’m in the smaller camp here, but I stopped buying all but my hardcore faves during that crossover event and will do the same again through Secret Empire and Generations, assuming they don’t get cancelled and relaunched. I’m not going to follow characters across half a dozen titles I don’t want to read when all I want is a good, self-contained story told by talented creators. Events often end up relaunching already strong-selling titles, sometimes with the previous team but oftentimes not, which forces the reader to decide whether to drop or keep. Given Marvel’s numbers, looks like most fans are opting to drop, and I can’t blame them.

Diversity versus Reality

When you look at the sales figures, the only way to claim diversity doesn’t sell is to have a skewed interpretation of “diversity.” Out of Marvel’s current twenty female-led series, four series—America, Ms. Marvel, Silk, and Moon Girl—star women of color, and only America has an openly queer lead character. Only America, Gamora, Hawkeye, Hulk, Ms. Marvel, and Patsy Walker, A.K.A. Hellcat! (cancelled), are written by women. That’s not exactly a bountiful harvest of diversity. Plenty of comics starring or written by cishet white men get the axe over low sales, but when diversity titles are cancelled people come crawling out of the woodwork to blame diverse readers for not buying a million issues. First, we are buying titles, just usually not by the issue. Second, why should we bear the full responsibility for keeping diverse titles afloat? Non-diverse/old school fans could stand to look up from their longboxes of straight white male superheroes and subscribe to Moon Girl. Allyship is meaningless without action.

“Diversity” as a concept is a useful tool, but it can’t be the goal or the final product. It assumes whiteness (and/or maleness and/or heteronormitivity) as the default and everything else as a deviation from that. This is why diversity initiatives so often end up being quantitative—focused on the number of “diverse” individuals—rather than qualitative, committed to positive representation and active inclusion in all levels of creation and production. This kind of in-name-only diversity thinking is why Mayonnaise McWhitefeminism got cast as Major Motoko Kusanagi while actual Japanese person Rila Fukushima was used as nothing but a face mold for robot geishas.

Rather than getting hung up on diversity as a numbers game, we should be working toward inclusion and representation both on and off the page. True diversity is letting minority creators tell their own stories instead of having non-minorities creating a couple of minority characters to sprinkle in the background. It’s telling a story with characters that reflect the world. It’s accommodating for diverse backgrounds without reducing characters to stereotypes or tokens. It’s more than just acknowledging diversity in terms of race and gender/sexual identities but also disabilities, mental health, religion, and body shapes as well. It’s about building structures behind the scenes to make room for diverse creators. G. Willow Wilson said it best: “Diversity as a form of performative guilt doesn’t work. Let’s scrap the word diversity entirely and replace it with authenticity and realism. This is not a new world. This is *the world.*…It’s not “diversity” that draws those elusive untapped audiences, it’s *particularity.* This is a vital distinction nobody seems to make. This goes back to authenticity and realism.”

Alex Brown is a teen librarian, writer, geeknerdloserweirdo, and all-around pop culture obsessive who watches entirely too much TV. Keep up with her every move on Twitter and Instagram, or get lost in the rabbit warren of ships and fandoms on her Tumblr.

via Tor.com

#IFTTT #Feedly #Nothingman uses feedly

0 notes