ICJ Opens Genocide Case: South Africa Accuses Israel

In a historic development, South Africa brings a genocide case against Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over the ongoing Gaza war. Legal experts and activists rally as the world watches closely.

Key Players in The Hague

South Africa's legal team, including Ronald Lamola, Adila Hassim, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, and others, presented a compelling case against Israel. The accusation: genocide against the people of Gaza.

Full Case Hearing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g2vQ7suQWGg

Israel's Strong Rebuttal

Israel responds with a vehement denial, accusing South Africa of being the "legal arm" of Hamas. The ICJ hears contrasting narratives as the legal battle unfolds. https://twitter.com/IsraelMFA/status/1745470810309968356

Genocidal Acts in Gaza

South Africa's case points to more than 23,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, killed in the three-month war. The UN describes the humanitarian situation as a "catastrophe," with Gaza's population of 2.3 million facing displacement and severe restrictions on essential resources. https://twitter.com/PalestineChron/status/1745472327683305795

Legal Grounds and Genocide Convention

South Africa argues that Israel violated the UN's 1948 Genocide Convention, established after the Holocaust. The 84-page document filed outlines alleged genocidal acts in Gaza, with Adila Hassim stating, "Nothing will stop the suffering, except an order from this court." https://twitter.com/PalestineChron/status/1745446023290392679

International Reaction and Solidarity

Pro-Palestinian supporters gather outside the ICJ, echoing calls to end Israel's war. The case resonates globally, with figures like Rashida Tlaib expressing support and condemning the US's role in the ongoing violence. https://twitter.com/RepRashida/status/1745221911691272485

Israel's Defense and Accusations

Israel rejects the genocide accusations, calling them "baseless" and a "blood libel." Prime Minister Netanyahu dismisses the case, emphasizing Israel's right to defend itself against terrorism. https://twitter.com/MiddleEastEye/status/1745329755363455450

ICJ's Historic Role

The International Court of Justice (ICJ), known as the World Court, becomes the stage for this historic legal battle. Analysts deem South Africa's case "extremely compelling," emphasizing the significance of invoking the Genocide Convention. https://twitter.com/CIJ_ICJ/status/1745373246038425929

Anticipating ICJ's Decision

As the ICJ closes its first hearing, eyes turn to the court's decision. Legal expert Geoffrey Nice highlights the need for "provisional measures" to address ongoing abuses, with hopes for a swift resolution. In a world grappling with conflicting narratives, the ICJ's decision may shape the discourse on the Israel-Gaza conflict. The unfolding legal drama prompts reflection on accountability, justice, and the quest for a lasting peace in the Middle East. Read the full article

Protecting intellectual property is crucial for any successful video game franchise. Recently, two industry titans, Ubisoft and Microsoft, took a stand against the unauthorized sale of merchandise related to their popular titles, Assassin's Creed and Minecraft. These lawsuits highlight the ongoing battle against counterfeiting within the gaming industry. Ubisoft and Microsoft Sue Over A Multi-Platform Assault: Targeting Unlicensed Merchandise Both Ubisoft and Microsoft filed lawsuits targeting the sale of unlicensed merchandise on various online marketplaces. These marketplaces, including iOffer, Wish, Amazon, Walmart, and eCRATER, allegedly hosted third-party sellers offering counterfeit products that infringed upon the intellectual property rights of the respective companies. Deception Through Imitation: The Problem of Counterfeit Merchandise The lawsuits allege that the infringing merchandise uses recognizable elements from the Assassin's Creed and Minecraft franchises. These imitations are likely designed to deceive consumers into believing they are purchasing genuine, officially licensed products. Ubisoft specifically mentions that counterfeit sellers leverage SEO (Search Engine Optimization) tactics to gain a higher ranking in online searches compared to legitimate merchandise. This deceptive practice makes it difficult for consumers to find authentic products and increases the likelihood of them unknowingly purchasing counterfeits. A Persistent Problem: The Elusive Nature of Counterfeiters One of the significant challenges in combating counterfeit merchandise is the sellers' ability to evade detection and legal repercussions. The lawsuits mention that these sellers have employed tactics like changing company names or utilizing websites hosted on non-US servers to avoid previous litigation attempts. This highlights the need for a multi-pronged approach, combining legal action with cooperation from online marketplaces to effectively shut down counterfeit operations. Protecting Intellectual Property: The Goals of the Lawsuits Both Ubisoft and Microsoft aim to achieve specific outcomes through their respective lawsuits: Cease: The lawsuits seek to permanently halt the sale of unlicensed merchandise by the targeted sellers. This would prevent further infringement on their intellectual property rights. Preventative Measures: The lawsuits aim to establish legal precedents that discourage future attempts at counterfeiting these franchises' merchandise. Damages Recovery: Ubisoft has estimated damages of $2 million per intellectual property violation, indicating their intent to recover compensation for lost sales due to counterfeit products. Identifying the Source: While the initial lawsuits do not name specific sellers, a critical next step involves identifying the manufacturers and distributors in China, the primary source of many counterfeit goods. A Broader Issue: The Impact of Counterfeit Merchandise Counterfeit merchandise poses a significant threat to the video game industry beyond lost revenue for developers and publishers. Here's a breakdown of some of the negative consequences: Consumer Harm: Counterfeit products are often of inferior quality and may not meet safety standards. This can put consumers at risk and damage the reputation of the original brand. Loss of Jobs: The sale of counterfeit merchandise undercuts legitimate businesses and can lead to job losses within the gaming industry. Erosion of Trust: The prevalence of counterfeits can erode consumer trust in established brands and make it difficult for them to compete in the marketplace. FAQs Q: Why are Ubisoft and Microsoft suing over counterfeit merchandise? Ubisoft and Microsoft are suing to protect their intellectual property rights and prevent the sale of unlicensed merchandise that infringes upon their popular franchises, Assassin's Creed and Minecraft. Q: What are the risks of buying counterfeit video game merchandise? Counterfeit merchandise is often of inferior quality and may not meet safety standards. Additionally, purchasing counterfeits hurts the video game industry and can lead to job losses. Q: How do counterfeiters evade litigation? A: Some counterfeiters change company names or host websites on non-US servers to avoid legal repercussions, as highlighted in Ubisoft's lawsuit.

Expert Witness: Your Trusted Investment Banking Expert Witness

An Investment Banking Expert Witness from Expert Witness offers specialized knowledge in finance for legal cases. They provide expert opinions and testimony on investment banking practices, regulations, and industry standards. With their expertise, they help lawyers and courts understand complex financial matters. Expert Witness's professionals have extensive experience in investment banking, making them highly qualified to assist in legal proceedings.

The Delhi High Court has extended the remand of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal with the Enforcement Directorate (ED) until April first. During the hearing in court, both the ED and Kejriwal presented their arguments, where the ED stated that statements of Arvind Kejriwal have been recorded, but there's a need to confront him with a certain individual. Additionally, there is a requirement to examine the seized digital data. Chief Minister Kejriwal is not cooperating with the ED during questioning. On the other hand, Kejriwal stated that this case has been ongoing for two years, he has been arrested, yet there is no evidence against him. In my presence, Manish Sisodia has submitted documents related to the excise policy; many legislators visit my residence. Is there any basis for arresting a sitting Chief Minister? The accused give their statements, but they are repeatedly summoned, then they give statements against me, and then they are granted bail. After the hearing, the Delhi High Court extended Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's remand with the ED until April first. Now, until April first, the Chief Minister of Delhi will remain in ED custody. The investigative agency had requested a seven-day remand from the Delhi court. In addition, a public interest litigation was filed in the Delhi High Court demanding the removal of Delhi's Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal from office, which the Delhi High Court dismissed. The bench chaired by Acting Chief Justice Manmohan said that the court understands that there may be some practical difficulties. Why should any order be passed? We are not supposed to give guidance to the President or the Lieutenant Governor. The executive branch implements the President's rule, and it is not the court's job to guide them.

Follow us on: YouTube: https://youtube.com/@indianewsbusiness Twitter: https://twitter.com/indianewsbiz Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/indianewsbus... Official Website: https://indianewsbusiness.com/

HRMantra's Legal Battle Against Darwinbox Titans

Introduction:

In a blockbuster legal showdown, HRMantra Software Pvt Ltd has initiated a no-holds-barred legal crusade against its ex-employee Nasreen Shaikh and the trio behind Darwinbox Digital Solutions Pvt Ltd - Chaitanya Peddi, Jayant Paleti, and Rohit Chennamaneni. The FIR, wielding the legal arsenal of Sections 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, and Sections 43 (a), (b), and (g) along with 66, 66-B, 66-C, 72, 72-A of the Information Technology Act 2000, exposes a gripping tale of corporate espionage and alleged subversion.

Backdrop:

With a legacy spanning over two decades, HRMantra has been a trailblazer in the HR and payroll software arena, having developed and marketed its flagship product, HRMantra, since the year 2000. However, the tranquility was disrupted when Darwinbox allegedly embarked on a calculated mission, strategically poaching HRMantra's experienced professionals and violating contractual agreements that prohibited them from joining competitors in the HR and payroll software domain for a mandated two-year period.

Legal Onslaught:

The FIR meticulously chronicles how Darwinbox allegedly circumvented contractual obligations set by HRMantra, willfully disregarding appointment letters, employee undertakings, bond agreements, and full and final settlement terms. These contractual safeguards explicitly prohibit ex-employees from disclosing trade secrets, client lists, employee details, and other sensitive information or tarnishing HRMantra's reputation in any media.

Business Fallout:

The aftermath of Darwinbox's alleged actions has wreaked havoc on HRMantra. The FIR claims that Nasreen Shaikh and eight other employees transitioned to Darwinbox, strategically targeting HRMantra's clients. This has resulted in a substantial loss of clients, a financial setback amounting to crores of Rupees, and a discernible blow to HRMantra's once-untarnished brand standing.

Founder's Persistence:

In the face of adversity, HRMantra's founder, Mr. Pankaj Bhargav, displayed unwavering determination. After initially approaching the police in August 2021, he persisted through the legal labyrinth, ultimately securing a court order on January 2, 2024. This directive compelled the Charkop police station to formally register the FIR on February 20, 2024.

Conclusion:

As the legal drama unfolds, the business community awaits the outcome, recognizing the potential impact on corporate ethics, employee loyalty, and fair competition. HRMantra's bold legal offensive against the founders of Darwinbox underscores the imperative of protecting proprietary assets and upholding integrity in the fiercely competitive corporate landscape. The resolution of this clash could well shape standards for ethical conduct and professional loyalty in the dynamic tech industry.

Download FIR now- Click here

Continuation of Pohuwato Riot Trial, Defendant's Defense: JPU Witnesses Fail to Prove Incitement

Continuation of Pohuwato Riot Trial, Defendant's Defense: JPU Witnesses Fail to Prove Incitement #PohuwatoRiot #DefenseStatements

Hargo.co.id, GORONTALO – The trial of the Pohuwato riot case resumed at the Gorontalo District Court. Held in the Corruption and Industrial Relations Courtroom of Gorontalo, the session with the examination agenda of witnesses from the Public Prosecutor (JPU) presented 3 witnesses from the Police. According to the defense lawyers, the testimonies presented by the JPU witnesses were deemed…

View On WordPress

Judge Rules Donald Trump Cannot Challenge Rape Claim at Defamation Trial

U.S. Jury Concludes Trump Sexually Abused Writer E. Jean Carroll

E. Jean Carroll exits Manhattan Federal Court following the verdict in the civil rape accusation case against former U.S. President Donald Trump, in New York City, U.S., May 9, 2023. Court Ruling Bars Trump from Disputing Rape Claim U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan in Manhattan has ruled that former President Donald Trump cannot contest in a defamation trial that he did not rape writer E. Jean Carroll in the mid-1990s, as a previous jury found that he sexually abused her. In a recent order, Judge Kaplan granted Carroll's request to prevent the defense from arguing that the prior jury's decision was due to disbelief in Carroll's rape accusation. Background of the Case A jury in May previously directed Trump to pay Carroll $5 million for their alleged encounter in a Bergdorf Goodman store dressing room, which Trump denies ever occurred. Additionally, he was held accountable for defaming her in 2022. In the upcoming Jan. 16 trial, a distinct jury will deliberate on the amount Trump should compensate Carroll for defamation, specifically related to statements made in 2019. Court's Justification Trump's legal team claimed that the prior jury's conclusion undermined Carroll's assertion of malice by asserting that he didn't recognize Carroll and that she fabricated the rape claim for book sales. However, Judge Kaplan ruled that despite not fitting the definition of rape under New York law, the jury's finding that Trump forcibly and non-consensually penetrated Carroll's vagina substantiated her rape claim in modern parlance. Trial Details Carroll is seeking $10 million in compensatory damages along with punitive damages. She is expected to testify, and Trump could potentially be a trial witness. Despite facing numerous legal challenges, including 91 criminal charges across four indictments, Trump remains a front runner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. Trump's legal team and representatives have not yet responded to requests for comments. Case Information The ongoing case is Carroll v. Trump, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 20-07311. Read the full article

The Bain family murders, which occurred on June 20, 1994, in Dunedin, New Zealand, remain one of the most haunting and controversial criminal cases in the country’s history. The tragedy unfolded within the walls of the Bain family home, leaving five members dead, a lone survivor, and a community grappling with questions of guilt, innocence, and justice.

Country singer Jimmie Allen finds himself in a complex legal situation as one sexual assault lawsuit against him is dismissed, while another remains ongoing. This article dives deep into the details of these cases and their potential impact on Allen's career. Former Manager Drops Lawsuit Against Allen In a recent development, Allen's former manager, identified only as "Jane Doe" in court documents, has agreed to drop her lawsuit accusing him of sexual assault. This case, filed in May 2023, alleged that Allen had engaged in a pattern of sexual harassment and abuse towards her over 18 months. The dismissal comes just a year after the lawsuit was filed. Both parties, Allen and the accuser, have reached a "mutual accord" to dismiss their claims and counterclaims, according to court documents filed on Thursday. It's important to note that this dismissal reflects a desire by both parties to move past litigation and doesn't necessarily signify any admission of guilt on Allen's part. While the details of the agreement haven't been publicly disclosed, Allen's representative declined to comment on the matter. Second Sexual Assault Lawsuit Against Allen Still Active Despite the dismissal of the first lawsuit, Allen still faces legal challenges related to sexual assault allegations. Another woman, also identified as "Jane Doe", has filed a separate lawsuit against him. This second lawsuit, filed in June 2023, alleges that Allen sexually assaulted her in a Las Vegas hotel room and secretly recorded the encounter without her consent. This case remains pending in court, meaning a legal decision has yet to be reached. The Impact on Allen's Career These sexual assault allegations have significantly impacted Allen's career trajectory. He was a rising star in the country music scene at the beginning of 2023, but the accusations in May and June led to a series of professional setbacks. Following the lawsuits, Allen's record label, booking agency, publicist, and management company all either suspended their relationship with him or dropped him entirely. Deeper Dive into the Accusations First Lawsuit (May 2023): The lawsuit filed by Allen's former manager claimed that he misused his power over her for a period of 18 months (2020-2022). The accuser alleges that she expressed discomfort verbally and nonverbally, including pushing Allen away and crying. The lawsuit asserts that Allen made her job dependent on her silence regarding his alleged behavior. Second Lawsuit (June 2023): This lawsuit involves an alleged incident in July 2022 at a Las Vegas hotel. The accuser claims that while she initially entered the room willingly, she revoked consent before sexual intercourse. The lawsuit also alleges that Allen secretly filmed the encounter on his phone, despite her not consenting to being recorded. Allen's Response to the Accusations Allen has vehemently denied all allegations of sexual assault, vowing to "mount a vigorous defense." Additionally, he filed counter-suits against both women. The counter-suit against his former manager accused her of defamation, while the counter-suit against the second accuser alleged that she stole the phone he used to record the encounter (according to her accusations). Unanswered Questions and the Road Ahead While the dismissal of the first lawsuit offers some resolution in that specific case, the ongoing legal battle with the second Jane Doe leaves a cloud of uncertainty hanging over Allen's career. Here are some key questions that remain unanswered: What will be the outcome of the second sexual assault lawsuit? Will more details about the dismissal agreement between Allen and his former manager be revealed? How will these legal battles ultimately impact Allen's professional standing within the country music industry? FAQs: Q: Has Jimmie Allen's former manager dropped the lawsuit against him? A: Yes, Jimmie Allen's former manager has agreed to dismiss her lawsuit alleging sexual assault, along with Jimmie Allen's counter-suit for defamation. Q: What are the allegations against Wide Open Music and Ash Bowers? A: The accuser claims that Wide Open Music and Ash Bowers failed to protect her from Jimmie Allen's abusive behavior and wrongfully terminated her when she complained about it. Q: How has the legal turmoil affected Jimmie Allen's career? A: Jimmie Allen's career has faced setbacks, including suspensions and terminations by industry entities, following the sexual assault accusations. However, he remains steadfast in his defense against the allegations.

Capital Markets Expert Witness: Tycon Partners By Your Side

Tycon Partners, a renowned firm, specializes in providing financial expert witness services. With their expertise, they support legal proceedings by offering clear and credible testimony on financial matters. As trusted advisors, Tycon Partners assists in resolving disputes by providing insightful analysis and guidance. Their dedication ensures fair and accurate outcomes in financial litigation cases.

Cop shoots into a car lies about it and gets fired and decertified Johntaven Simmons Robert Rumble interview

Full Playlist - https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLh5lfsLorl-owmeeO4Y_yIqQwk_rQuDQj

Full video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qMMZuAanOY

Open records issues - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRwTlbU2Ftk&t=175s

JOHNTAVEN JAMAL SIMMONS / Mitchell County Sheriff's Office (Georgia) 

FIRED AND DECERTIFIED

On 06/21/2021 at 4:26PM, Deputy Bostick of the Michael County Sheriffs office 

SOS link https://shieldsofshame.com/johntaven-jamal-simmons/

Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100080172275153

Condensed versions of the interviews on Spotify 

Edward Connell - https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/billy-blume/episodes/Cop-shoots-into-a-car-lies-about-it-and-gets-fired-and-decertified-Johntaven-Simmons-Edward-Connell-interview-e2bqcdi

Captain Robert Rumble interview - https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/billy-blume/episodes/Cop-shoots-into-a-car-lies-about-it-and-gets-fired-and-decertified-Johntaven-Simmons-Robert-Rumble-interview-e2bqcf7

On June 21, 2021, at 4:26 PM, Deputy Bostick was dispatched to 316 MLK Street in Baconton in response to a report of a vehicle's window being shot. Upon arrival, Deputy Bostick contacted Mrs. Huntley, who reported hearing a loud bang while inside her house and subsequently discovering the back glass of her vehicle, parked by the road, shattered.

Deputy Bostick and Investigator Brooks arrived at the scene and observed several people outside. They found no bullet fragments near or inside the vehicle but noticed two males on a front porch across from the incident, one of whom was identified as Mr. Johntaven Simmons. Mr. Simmons reported hearing a gunshot but did not know its direction.

Investigator Brooks located the impact point on the vehicle and collected evidence, including a silver, rust-colored dust in the dent. Surveillance cameras on the side of the house captured footage of the incident, showing a tan or brown vehicle pulling up nearby and a black male in all black exiting the vehicle, walking towards the road, and then returning to the car with a gun in hand after the glass breakage.

Upon reviewing the video, Deputy Bostick and Investigator Brooks noticed that Mr. Simmons' clothing matched that of the individual in the footage. Mr. Simmons became frustrated during questioning and refused to answer further questions. A bullet casing was found near the scene, matching the gun seen in the video.

The video was sent to Investigator Brooks for further analysis, which helped in identifying the shooter. Mr. Simmons was arrested at 321 MLK Street after his clothing was matched to that in the video. He surrendered a 9MM gun that matched the casing found. Mr. Simmons was charged with Reckless Conduct, Obstruction Of Officers, and Discharge of a Gun or Pistol Near a Public Highway or Street, and was transported to Mitchell County Jail by Deputy Wilson.

Father and Son Allegedly Fatally Shot by Downstairs Neighbor in Brooklyn on Sunday Night

The family of the victim said the person they suspect is insane. They said he always complained about noise, even when they weren't making any noise. On Sunday, he confronted the family again and used a gun.However, the daughter of the victim said, "He killed my brother and my dad. "The family lives in East Flatbush, Brooklyn. The police say their angry neighbor shot and killed a 47-year-old man named Bladimy Mathurin and his 27-year-old son, Chinwai Mode.ALSO READ: Interesting stories 

Mathurin's wife, Marie Delille, is now a widow and a mother in grief. She said that ever since her family moved into the fourth floor of the Flatbush Gardens apartment building four years ago, they argued with the man living directly below them because he complained that their kids were too loud. Sunday was no different."I was in the kitchen, washing dishes, and I heard loud noises. I asked, 'Did anybody make noise?' The kids said, 'No, Mommy, nobody made noise.' My husband knocked on the floor to respond. The man came upstairs and kicked the door," Delille said.LEARN MORE: Read blogs and articles here!!!The police say Mathurin opened the door, argued with the neighbor, and was threatening him with a pair of scissors when the neighbor shot the father and son in the head. But Delille, who says she was there, disagrees with the police."My husband had no gun, no weapon. Why did you bring a gun to shoot my family? Why would you bring a gun to hurt my family? Why? Why?" Delille said.Moreover, a friend of the family, Mickael Louis, said, "He looks scary because he's muscular, but that's not who he is. He is a nice guy."ALSO CHECK: Affordable productsThe family and friends are not only grieving but also worried about their safety. They fear the shooter might come back. Delille said, “I want justice to be done."Watch the video below!http://viraltrendx.ezzybrown.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/ssstwitter.com_1698858058203.mp4 Read the full article

https://bit.ly/3FIB1eZ - 🛂 Two Russian nationals, Aleksandr Derebenetc and Kirill Shipulin, have been indicted for conspiring to hack the taxi dispatch system at JFK Airport, New York. Alongside, two American hackers, Daniel Abayev and Peter Leyman, have pleaded guilty to related charges. The scheme involved manipulating the dispatch system to prioritize certain taxis for payment, affecting taxi line order and operations. #CyberSecurity #JFKAirport ⚖️ The indictment highlights a grave concern for infrastructure systems' vulnerability to cyber hacking. U.S. Attorney Damian Williams emphasized the commitment to prosecuting criminal hackers, whether domestic or international. The Port Authority Inspector General John Gay acknowledged the impact of the scheme on hard-working taxi drivers and affirmed the authority's dedication to safe and equitable operations. #LegalNews #InfrastructureProtection 🔒 The hacking activities spanned from September 2019 to September 2021, with various attempts to infiltrate the dispatch system including using malware and unauthorized Wi-Fi access. Messages exchanged among the conspirators reveal their explicit intentions to disrupt the taxi dispatch system. #Cybercrime #Hacking 🚖 The successful hacks allowed as many as 1,000 fraudulently expedited taxi trips a day, with the American hackers charging drivers to skip the line. This large-scale disruption significantly affected the regular taxi operations at JFK. #Transportation #TaxiIndustry 📜 Derebenetc and Shipulin face two counts of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion, with a maximum sentence of 10 years each. Abayev and Leyman, having pleaded guilty, face a maximum of five years in prison. Sentencing dates have been scheduled for early 2024. The case highlights ongoing efforts to address and mitigate cyber threats to critical infrastructure. #LegalProceedings #CyberLaw Note: The defendants are presumed innocent until proven guilty. The case is handled by the Complex Frauds and Cybercrime Unit, demonstrating the intricate nature of cybercrimes in today's interconnected world.

Continuation of Pohuwato Riot Trial Postponed, Gorontalo District Court: Adjusting Trial Schedule

Continuation of Pohuwato Riot Trial Postponed, Gorontalo District Court: Adjusting Trial Schedule #PohuwatoRiot #TrialPostponement #GorontaloCourt

Hargo.co.id, GORONTALO – The trial agenda for the Pohuwato riot case faces postponement by the panel of judges. According to Bayu Lesmana Taruna, JUDGE and Public Relations Officer of the District Court/Anti-Corruption and Industrial Relations Hub Gorontalo 1A, the scheduled session for Tuesday (16/1/2024) included presenting exceptions from several defendants. “In addition, a sick defendant who…

View On WordPress