#Legal Representative | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

leonardomongillo · 11 months

Text

Mongillo Law - Why a Strong Courtroom Demeanour is Crucial for a Family Law Expert

When it comes to family law cases, the courtroom can be an intimidating battleground where emotions run high and critical decisions are made. In such a dynamic environment, the importance of a family law expert's courtroom presence cannot be overstated. Beyond their legal knowledge and expertise, the way they carry themselves, communicate, and connect with the judge and jury can significantly impact the outcome of a case. This is why Mongillo Law says Choosing the Right Family Law Expert - Your Key to a Successful Case. In this blog post, we will delve into the significance of a strong courtroom demeanor for a family law expert, highlighting how it can influence credibility, persuasion, and ultimately, the client's success.

Building Credibility and Trust:

When a family law expert enters the courtroom, their presence speaks volumes about their professionalism and credibility. Judges and juries are observant and make initial judgments based on appearances and demeanour. A family law expert who exudes confidence, maintains composure, and presents themselves with respect commands attention and fosters trust. By establishing a strong presence, they lay the groundwork for a favourable perception and create an environment where their arguments and evidence are given due consideration.

Commanding Attention and Engagement:

Courtrooms can be chaotic and distracting, with multiple parties vying for attention. A family law expert with a commanding courtroom presence has the ability to cut through the noise and focus the attention of the judge and jury on their client's case. By using effective body language, clear and concise communication, and a confident tone, they ensure that their arguments and evidence are presented in a compelling manner. Their presence becomes a magnet, drawing in the audience and compelling them to listen and engage with the case.

Effective Cross-Examination and Rebuttal:

Cross-examination is a key component of family law cases, and a strong courtroom presence is invaluable during this phase. A family law expert who exhibits confidence, poise, and control while cross-examining witnesses demonstrates their ability to dismantle opposing arguments and cast doubt on the credibility of the other party. By employing powerful questioning techniques and maintaining a strong presence, they can effectively challenge witnesses and create doubt in the minds of the judge and jury. Mongillo Law asserts this as one of the Key Qualities to Look for in a Family Law Expert When Children Are Involved.

Influencing the Perception of Clients:

Clients going through family law cases often experience heightened emotions and uncertainty. A family law expert with a strong courtroom presence can provide reassurance and instil confidence in their clients. By projecting an air of authority and professionalism, they create a sense of security and trust, alleviating their clients' concerns. This, in turn, enables clients to feel more at ease during the courtroom proceedings, allowing them to better navigate the emotional challenges of the case.

By mastering the art of presence, family law experts can effectively advocate for their clients, present compelling arguments, and ultimately, increase the chances of a favorable outcome.

#law-in-canada #lawyer-in-canada #leonardo mongillo law #advocate #family-law-canada #jurisdiction #lawyer #legal representative #family law #justice #family lawyer toronto #family-law-toronto #law-in-toronto #lawyer-in-toronto #family-lawyer-canada #family-law-expert #Strong Courtroom #Demeanour

8 notes · View notes

martinarobins · 12 hours

Text

Rhode Island Employee' Comp Legal Professionals: Supporters For Your Rights

The Rhode Island workers comp attorney focus on helping staff members wounded on duty to navigate legal processes for decent compensation. They provide professional support, advocating for customers' rights and also guaranteeing they get effective treatment as well as financial backing. Along with know-how of state regulations and knowledge in taking care of claims, these lawyers offer very useful assistance in securing employees' welfares and also securing due advantages.

Simone & Simone LLP

128 Dorrance Street, Suite 530, Providence, RI 02903

+1 (401) 321-2020

#legal representative

1 note · View note

blue-likethebird · 7 months

Text

Thinking about how Ling offers Ed the philosopher’s stone as a toll to pass through the gate of truth and get Al back.

Because this is a selfless act. The stone is what drove Ling to cross the desert and come to Amestris in the first place. It’s going to make him emperor of Xing, ensure his clan isn’t destroyed in a messy war for succession rights, and give him the power he needs to change things. After everything he, Lan Fan, and Fu have done to get the stone in the first place, he’s willing to sacrifice any chance he has at using it to save a kid he’s known for about a year at the most (less, if you don’t count the time that Greed was in control).

But at the same time, for the exact same reasons that make his offer so selfless in the first place, this is still a selfish thing for him to do. That stone could grant him the power to save potentially thousands of people and he’s about to give that up for one person. Ed himself muses that Ling still needs the philosopher’s stone to help his people. It’s not an offer Ling would have made before the promised day, no matter how much he likes Ed and Al. It’s a greedy sacrifice to make, and I love that.

#bluebird.txt #fullmetal alchimist brotherhood #fma #fmab #ling yao #edward elric #alphonse elric #greed the avaricious #it’s oct 3rd so I legally get to go insane about fullmetal alchemist for a bit #the way the homunculi are used to represent the good and the bad of the vices they embody #screaming crying frothing at the mouth

155 notes · View notes

pusangkambing · 1 year

Text

You just had the scariest day of your life. You're staying at your uncle's place with their son because ur father is busy trying to find out who's your other father. Your life is in danger because your other uncle who's daughter just died, has gone on a mad rampage trying to kill all the eggs in the server. You're not as kitted out as your fellow eggs, who have guns and chainsaws and other weaponry. You're not as good with pvp either as you keep losing to your cousin when you play boxing. After your other uncle has calmed down and ur dad finally arrives, he barely pays any attention to you, he's more focused on helping your uncle than asking if you're even okay, you dont think he even loves you at all. You are emotionally exhausted, its been a scary day. The uncle you're staying with confronts your dad that he doesnt take care of you, while your other uncle, the one who just went on a rampage trying to kill you and the other eggs, just called you to the side. He's asking you to be his lawyer for the upcoming custody battle between him and his ex, where the person that loses will be sacrificed in exchange for the life of their daughter back, you are a couple of days old.

You are Tilin.

#this tiny traumatized emotionally neglected egg has to legally represent their uncle in court sjsjejwjkwk #tilin has been through a lot #paimon!liveblogs!#quackity #slimecicle #qsmp

248 notes · View notes

wisteriagoesvroom · 3 months

Text

to this day it cracks me up that zak brown saw that college age aussie twink with bunny teeth, chill demeanour, flawless driving record, and the big M hairline and said: yes. i want that one.

(and i will begrudgingly applaud him for it.)

#zak brown out here playing 4D chess #he saw the vision when alpine’s one extremely inundated lawyer was still trying to open a word doc #one thing about zak is that he will be consistently sneaky #a sneaky sneaky snake #but at least we got this out of it??#I.e. the growth of the papaya twink factory with one more extraordinary representative #for legal reasons this is a joke #oscar piastri

26 notes · View notes

cinematic-literature · 6 months

Photo

Legally Blonde 2: Red, White & Blonde (2003) by Charles Herman-Wurmfeld

Book title

Animal Liberation (1975) by Peter Singer

Living in Harmony with Animals (2000) by Carla Bennett

Constitution, Jefferson’s Manual, and the Rules of the House of Representatives

Food Drug and Cosmetic Act: A Practical Guide to Law & Regulation

Animal Testing Question: Alternatives & Analyses

History of the FDA

#legally blonde 2 red white & blonde #charles herman-wurmfeld #books in movies #animal liberation #peter singer #living in harmony with animals #carla bennett #constitution jefferson's manual and the rules of the house of representatives #food drug and cosmetic act a practical guide to law & regulation #animal testing questions alternatives & analyses #history of the fda

48 notes · View notes

jimmyspades · 3 months

Text

#every night I make gifs from the 2-3 blegal episodes I watched that day. it is like a bedtime routine it makes me sleepy #ughhh eventually I wanna do an 'alan shore in every episode' gifset series but i'm too busy rn.... maybe in the spring #I have so many plans and ideas and so little time 💔#james spader #alan shore #boston legal #*#this scene is funny bc he says 'I don't represent evil people'#when Literally a minute ago he admitted he makes all his employees sign harassment waivers.#babygirl the call is coming from inside the house. you might BE the evil people my love my darling <3

24 notes · View notes

theinfinitedivides · 6 months

Text

Dong Soo coming into the living room of his boyfriend's house three piece suit on sh*t-eating grin acquired and c*nt prepared to be served after getting a call from the side piece (Oh Jae) that the police are here and on the premises. the police happen to be his apartment neighbor (who i said would get his ass involved in this sh*t) and detective coworker on Moon Law Firm's payroll. Do Young, the aforementioned boyfriend, is finding this all terribly entertaining

#tv: biography of a villain #biography of a villain #evilive #evillive #shin ha kyun #shin hakyun #kim young kwang #kdrama #local gay watches k-dramas.txt #'i'm Han Dong Soo. Seo Do Young-ssi's legal representative' he's going to blow out your back so bad for that it's all piling up #he is waiting for the best time atp

24 notes · View notes

goldenpinof · 3 months

Note

Can we all form a tour management company called Phannies LTD and force dip and pip to hire us next time.

we would be unstoppable

#we are already hard to deal with but imagine having legal rights to demand things #and also having a legal representative #dnp's empire would thrive #answered #phandom

12 notes · View notes

dontmeantobepoliticalbut · 8 months

Text

A top House Democrat has reintroduced a bill to federally legalize, tax and regulate marijuana, with provisions to expunge prior cannabis convictions.

Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, refiled the Marijuana Opportunity, Reinvestment and Expungement (MORE) Act on Wednesday. There are 33 initial cosponsors—all Democrats.

The comprehensive legalization legislation has passed the House twice in recent sessions—but this marks the first time it’s being introduced with Republicans in control of the chamber, raising serious questions about whether it will move. The Judiciary Committee, which is the primary panel of jurisdiction, is chaired by anti-cannabis Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH).

Even the prospects of a modest marijuana banking bill that’s set for committee action in the Senate next week are uncertain in the House under the GOP majority. That said, a GOP-led House panel did advance legislation on Wednesday to prevent the denial of federal employment or security clearances based on a candidate’s past cannabis use.

In any case, advocates have long touted the MORE Act as an example of the type of wide-ranging cannabis reform legislation that would not only end prohibition but take steps to right the wrongs of prohibition and promote social equity.

Here are details about the key provisions of the MORE Act:

“Nadler’s MORE Act would deschedule marijuana by removing it from the list of federally banned drugs under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). However, it would not require states to legalize cannabis and would maintain a level of regulatory discretion up to states.

Marijuana products would be subject to a federal excise tax, starting at 5% for the first two years after enactment and rising to 8% by the fifth year of implementation.

Nobody could be denied federal public benefits based solely on the use or possession of marijuana or past juvenile conviction for a cannabis offense. Federal agencies couldn’t use 'past or present cannabis or marijuana use as criteria for granting, denying, or rescinding a security clearance.'

People could not be penalized under federal immigration laws for any cannabis related activity or conviction, whether it occurred before or after the enactment of the legalization legislation.

The bill creates a process for expungements of non-violent federal marijuana convictions.

Tax revenue from cannabis sales would be placed in a new 'Opportunity Trust Fund.' Half of those tax dollars would support a 'Community Reinvestment Grant Program' under the Justice Department, 10% would support substance misuse treatment programs, 40% would go to the federal Small Business Administration (SBA) to support implementation and a newly created equitable licensing grant program.

The Community Reinvestment Grant Program would 'fund eligible non-profit community organizations to provide a variety of services for individuals adversely impacted by the War on Drugs…to include job training, reentry services, legal aid for civil and criminal cases (including for expungement of cannabis convictions), among others.'

The program would further support funding for substance misuse treatment for people from communities disproportionately impacted by drug criminalization. Those funds would be available for programs offering services to people with substance misuse disorders for any drug, not just cannabis.

While the bill wouldn’t force states to adopt legalization, it would create incentives to promote equity. For example, SBA would facilitate a program to providing licensing grants to states and localities that have moved to expunge records for people with prior marijuana convictions or 'taken steps to eliminate violations or other penalties for persons still under State or local criminal supervision for a cannabis-related offense or violation for conduct now lawful under State or local law.'

The bill’s proposed Cannabis Restorative Opportunity Program would provide funds 'for loans to assist small business concerns that are owned and controlled by individuals adversely impacted by the War on Drugs in eligible States and localities.'

The comptroller general, in consultation with the head of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), would be required to carry out a study on the demographics of people who have faced federal marijuana convictions, 'including information about the age, race, ethnicity, sex, and gender identity.'

The Departments of Treasury, Justice and the SBA would need to 'issue or amend any rules, standard operating procedures, and other legal or policy guidance necessary to carry out implementation of the MORE Act' within one year of its enactment.

Marijuana producers and importers would also need to obtain a federal permit. And they would be subject to a $1,000 per year federal tax as well for each premise they operate.

The bill would impose certain packaging and labeling requirements.

It also prescribes penalties for unlawful conduct such as illegal, unlicensed production or importation of cannabis products.

The Treasury Secretary would be required to carry out a study 'on the characteristics of the cannabis industry, with recommendations to improve the regulation of the industry and related taxes.'

The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) would be required to 'regularly compile, maintain, and make public data on the demographics' of marijuana business owners and workers.

Workers in 'safety sensitive' positions, such as those regulated by the Department of Transportation, could continue to be drug tested for THC and face penalties for unauthorized use. Federal workers would also continue to be subject to existing drug testing policies.

References to 'marijuana' or 'marihuana' under federal statute would be changed to 'cannabis.' It’s unclear if that would also apply to the title of the bill itself.”

Some advocates say that the MORE Act’s time has passed, however, and that it doesn’t realistically grapple with the need to enact truly justice-focused legalization through a fair and equitable market.

“The MORE Act was never meant to be a bill to address the real needs of federal regulations,” Shaleen Title, founder and director, Parabola Center for Law and Policy, told Marijuana Moment. “It was a historic bill when it was first introduced to address systemic racial disparities and demonstrate that social justice must be addressed in federal reform, but has never fully addressed the economic justice side of the equation.”

“We’re in a period of rapid corporate consolidation, with a real possibility that big pharmaceutical corporations will be entering the industry in the near future,” she said. “Outdated legalization bills like this would quickly allow for monopolization, putting small farmers and mom-and-pop shops out of business and undermining the public health and racial equity goals of most state cannabis programs. They should all be updated with an intentional regulatory structure and a thoughtful plan to transition to a national market.”

25 notes · View notes

whatthefuckisasweep · 8 months

Text

if you or a loved one share a blorbo with me, you may be entitled to financial, emotional, spiritual, and physical compensation

#my art #LOOK AT ALL OF THEM #THEY ARE ALL SO IMPORTANT TO ME IN LIKE. A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS #i just started doodling some lil guys and then it spiraled into this #NOW I HAVE ALL OF THEM TOGETHER HERE AND IT MAKES ME REALLY HAPPY #look how different they all are in pERSONALITY BUT ALSO HOW SIMILAR AND !!! A AA ! !!! LOOK LOOK LOOK LOOK #i urge you all to draw your blorbos in a line -up . its healing for the SOULLLL #ill name them in order .#dexter grif... connor kenway...stanley uris... amir blumenfled(character)...matt(eddsworld)...vaughn (borderlands)... guillermo de la cruz #and the floating guy is beetlejuice FROM THE MUSICAL SPECIFICALLY!!!!#these represent my fixations for the past like 8-9 years SLDKGMSDLKMSDGSDG #try to “your type” me . i dare you #also if you share ANY of these with me . we can be friends. i will bite you (affectionate)#if you share 2 you are legally allowed to get free art from me . im handing you a coupon

21 notes · View notes

leonardomongillo · 11 months

Text

Leonardo Mongillo - What Top Family Lawyers Do Differently in Family Law Cases in Pursuit of Success

Family law cases can work adversely on the emotions of the parties involved and can turn out to be complex, often involving sensitive issues such as child custody, alimony, and property division. While many lawyers practice family law, according to Leonardo Mongillo – Family Lawyer Relationship Make a Difference in Divorce Cases and the like. So, what sets these top-tier legal professionals apart? In this blog, we will explore the unique strategies and approaches that the best family lawyers employ to excel in their field.

Client-centered Approach:

Top family lawyers understand that each client and case is unique, requiring personalized attention and customized legal strategies. They take the time to listen to their clients, understand their concerns, and align their objectives with the client's goals. By prioritizing the client's needs, they build trust and establish a strong attorney-client relationship, which is critical for successful case outcomes. Proactive Communication:

Effective communication is key to managing client expectations and keeping them informed throughout the legal process. The best family lawyers ensure that they maintain open lines of communication and provide regular updates on case progress. They are also responsive to client inquiries and make themselves available to address any questions or concerns promptly. Expert Negotiation Skills:

Family law cases often involve negotiating settlements and agreements. Top family lawyers are skilled negotiators who can navigate difficult conversations and secure favourable terms for their clients. They know when to push for more and when to compromise, always keeping their client's best interests in mind. Comprehensive Knowledge of Family Law:

The best family lawyers have an in-depth understanding of the complex and ever-changing landscape of family law. They keep themselves informed of relevant case law and legislative developments, ensuring that they can provide the most accurate and up-to-date advice to their clients. Their expertise allows them to identify creative solutions and devise effective legal strategies tailored to each case. Collaborative Approach:

Top family lawyers recognize the value of collaboration, both with their clients and with other legal professionals. They work closely with their clients to develop a shared vision for the case and encourage active participation in decision-making. They also collaborate with other professionals such as financial advisors, counselors, and therapists to ensure that their client's needs are met holistically. Strong Courtroom Presence:

While many family law cases are settled out of court, some cases inevitably go to trial. The best family lawyers are experienced litigators who can effectively advocate for their clients in court. They possess excellent public speaking skills, a deep understanding of courtroom procedures, and an ability to think on their feet. This as per Leonardo Mongillo's Law is How Top Family Lawyers Help in Winning Family Law Cases. By adopting these strategies and maintaining a steadfast commitment to their clients, top family lawyers consistently achieve successful outcomes in family law cases. If you're facing a family law matter, seeking the counsel of an experienced and highly skilled family lawyer can make all the difference in your case.

#law-in-canada #lawyer-in-canada #leonardo mongillo law #advocate #family-law-canada #jurisdiction #legal representative #family law #justice #lawyer #family law cases #family-lawyer-canada #law-in-Toronto #lawyer-in-Toronto #Family-law-toronto #family-lawyer-toronto #leo mongillo #mongillo law #leo mongillo law

10 notes · View notes

monstermoviedean · 1 year

Text

the thing about the failure to elect a speaker of the house is that it's so desperately not funny that it circles back around to being hilarious. which is to say i think misha collins should publicly announce his candidacy for speaker and wish destiel a happy 27 months of canon simultaneously.

#did you know that the speaker isn't legally required to be a representative? my coworker told me.#anyway i think this is a good opportunity to get some destiel back into american politics*#*in the context of an event that is important but upon which people's lives do not hinge

80 notes · View notes

dreaminginthedeepsouth · 16 days

Text

Steve Brodner

* * * *

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

April 18, 2024

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

APR 19, 2024

I will not spend the rest of 2024 focusing on Trump and the chaos in the Republican Party, but today it has been impossible to look away.

In Trump’s election interference trial in Manhattan, Judge Juan Merchan this morning dismissed one of the selected jurors after she expressed concern for her anonymity and thus for her safety. All of the reporters in the courtroom have shared so much information about the jurors that they seemed at risk of being identified, but Fox News Channel host Jesse Watters not only ran a video segment about a juror, he suggested she was “concerning.” Trump shared the video on social media.

The juror told the judge that so much information about her had become public that her friends and family had begun to ask her if she was one of the jurors. Legal analyst Joyce White Vance noted jurors’ fear for their safety was a concern normally seen only “in a case involving violent organized crime.”

Nonetheless, by the end of the day, twelve people had been chosen to serve as jurors. Tomorrow the process will continue in order to find six alternate jurors.

It is a courtesy for the two sides at a trial to share with each other the names of their next witnesses so the other team can prepare for them. Today the prosecution declined to provide the names of their first three witnesses to the defense lawyers out of concern that Trump would broadcast them on social media. “Mr. Trump has been tweeting about the witnesses. We’re not telling them who the witnesses are,” prosecutor Joshua Steinglass said.

Merchan said he “can’t blame them.” Trump’s defense attorney Todd Blanche offered to "commit to the court and the [prosecution] that President Trump will not [post] about any witness" on social media. "I don't think you can make that representation," Merchan said, in a recognition that Trump cannot be trusted, even by his own lawyers.

An article in the New York Times today confirmed that the trial will give Trump plenty of publicity, but not the kind that he prefers. Lawyer Norman L. Eisen walked through questions about what a prison sentence for Trump could look like.

Trump’s popular image is taking a hit in other ways, as well. Zac Anderson and Erin Mansfield of USA Today reported that Trump is funneling money from his campaign fundraising directly into his businesses. According to a new report filed with the Federal Election Commission, in February and March the campaign wrote checks totaling $411,287 to Mar-a-Lago and in March a check for $62,337 to Trump National Doral Miami.

Experts say it is legal for candidates to pay their own businesses for services used by the campaign so long as they pay fair market value. At the same time, they note that since Trump appears to be desperate for money, “it looks bad.”

Astonishingly, Trump’s trial was not the biggest domestic story today. Republicans in Congress were in chaos as members of the extremist Freedom Caucus worked to derail the national security supplemental bills that House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has introduced in place of the Senate bill, although they track that bill closely.

The House Rules Committee spent the day debating the foreign aid package, which appropriates aid for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan separately. The Israel bill also contains $9.1 billion in humanitarian aid for Gaza and other countries. A fourth bill focuses on forcing the Chinese owners of TikTok to sell the company, as well as on imposing sanctions on Russia and Iran.

At stake in the House Rules Committee was Johnson’s plan to allow the House to debate and vote on each measure separately, and then recombine them all into a single measure if they all pass. This would allow extremist Republicans to vote against aid to Ukraine, while still tying the pieces all together to send to the Senate. As Robert Jimison outlined in the New York Times, this complicated plan meant that the Rules Committee vote to allow such a maneuver was crucial to the bill’s passage.

The extremist House Republicans were adamantly opposed to the plan because of their staunch opposition to aid for Ukraine. They wrote in a memo on Wednesday: “This tactic allows Johnson to pass priorities favored by President Biden, the swamp and the Ukraine war machine with a supermajority of House members, leaving conservatives out to dry.”

Extremists Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) and Thomas Massie (R-KY) vowed to throw House speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) out of the speakership, but Democrats Tom Suozzi of New York and Jared Moskowitz of Florida have said they would vote to keep him in his seat, thereby defanging the attack on his leadership.

So the extremists instead tried to load the measures up with amendments prohibiting funds from being used for abortion, removing humanitarian aid for Gaza, opposing a two-state solution to the Hamas-Israel war, calling for a wall at the southern border of the U.S., defunding the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and so on.

Greene was especially active in opposition to aid to Ukraine. She tried to amend the bill to direct the president to withdraw the U.S. from NATO and demanded that any members of Congress voting for aid to Ukraine be conscripted into the Ukraine army as well as have their salaries taken to offset funding. She wanted to stop funding until Ukraine “turns over all information related to Hunter Biden and Burisma,” and to require Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky to resign. More curiously, she suggested amending the Ukraine bill so that funding would require “restrictions on ethnic minorities’, including Hungarians in Transcarpathia, right to use their native languages in schools are lifted.” This language echoes a very specific piece of Russian propaganda.

Finally, Moskowitz proposed “that Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene…should be appointed as Vladimir Putin’s Special Envoy to the United States Congress.”

Many congress members have left Washington, D.C., since Friday was to be the first day of a planned recess. This meant the partisan majority on the floor fluctuated. Olivia Beavers of Politico reported that that instability made Freedom Caucus members nervous enough to put together a Floor Action Response Team (FART—I am not making this up) to make sure other Republicans didn’t limit the power of the extremists when they were off the floor.

The name of their response team seems likely to be their way to signal their disrespect for the entire Congress. Their fellow Republicans are returning the heat. Today Mike Turner (R-OH) referred to the extremists as the Bully Caucus on MSNBC and said, “We need to get back to professionalism, we need to get back to governing, we need to get back to legislating.” Derrick Van Orden (R-WI) told Juliegrace Brufke of Axios: "The vast majority of the Republican Party in the House of Representatives...are sick and tired of having people who...constantly blackmail the speaker of the House.”

Another Republican representative, Jake LaTurner of Kansas, announced today he will not run for reelection. He joins more than 20 other Republican representatives heading for the exits.

After all the drama, the House Rules Committee voted 6–3 tonight to advance the foreign aid package to the House floor. Three Republicans voted nay. While it is customary for the opposition party to vote against advancing bills out of the committee, the Democrats broke with tradition and voted in favor.

LETTERS FROM AN AMERICAN

HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

#Letters From an American #Heather Cox Richardson #USHouse of Representatives #MAGA republicans #Moscow Republicans #Putin Caucus #House rules Committee #Moscow Mike Johnson #Trump Legal Jeopardy #jury selection

5 notes · View notes

greasygrimeygopher-whats · 1 year

Text

#I love aliens #representing bringing aliens into existance #legally #Splatoon 3 #creature #splatfest

50 notes · View notes

agentfaust · 5 months

Text

had a Pain Breakdown™️ in the middle of costco

#tom cruise #sorry to mar for ruining her meme but this represents my state of mind way better #moon talks too much #for legal reasons this is a joke #neither i nor tc are endorsing this type of behavior #idk

9 notes · View notes