Tumgik
sam-pvmind · 1 month
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
buddie + parallels with madney/bathena/henren
requested by anon
7K notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 months
Text
teen wolf is a show that aired in 2011 on mtv and is about a bunch of Only Children bullying a guy whose family recently died in a fire
8K notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 1 year
Photo
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
5K notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 1 year
Text
we don’t talk enough about claudia plotting lestat’s murder while lestat bickers with her and louis is just trying to get into the holiday spirit
Tumblr media
6K notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 1 year
Text
Richard's unhinged energy is the most entertaining part for me beside the murders. Like the guy is an inspiration for chaotic people. He lies about his family life, pretends his rich father has business in oil (who irl has a petrol pump), lies to his part time employer to get money, goes on a 90s teen movie shopping spree, takes any free item from Judy, lies about going to a prep school, lives on a diet of wine and more wine, takes any pill anyone gives him, joins a cultish greek gang, lets Bunny die an aesthetically pleasing death and not to forget.....does cocaine in the parking lot of Burger King.
3K notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
For those who read both
7K notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
44 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
i think what's really compelling about tsh is how out of the main players (and really out of everyone) there isn't one Good Person (in the sense of moral right/good vs wrong/evil story dichotomy type Good Person). Like,,, henry vs bunny alone. I feel like there's an instinct among readers (at least those I've seen on tiktok, which, i know, im sorry) to go Henry is Good and Right and Bunny is Evil and Wrong particularly upon first reading and then when you think critically it turns to Bunny is Actually Good and Right and Henry is Evil and Wrong to make sense of the story but both are Shitty, Terrible People.
Henry is a self-important, elitist serial-killer who is completely detached from the world around him from no one's fault but his own and Bunny is a leech who considers biogtry and a guiness world record catagory and blackmails his friends over a murder not because they killed an innocent man but because they didn't include him.
I think this is what makes tsh so compelling. You're not there to take sides, no matter how hard Richard (unconsciously?) tries. You're there to watch a series of terrible events unfold and to consider the complexity of human morality. Not one person is either Good or Evil. It's impossible and destructive to look at people that way and I think that's how tsh messes with you and I love it. I don't think Donna Tartt wants you to forgive or justify anything that anyone does, but to simply perceive them and your reactions to it
471 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
need info
Does anyone know the name of the farmer Henry kills? I'm trying to write something but I don't know if Donna gave him a name
20 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
The Greek Class™ when they mess up a note while playing the piano:
Richard: *proceeds to have a mental breakdown and cries for the next 4 hours*
Henry: *deep inhale of frustration* prActice mAkes pErFect
Francis: *nervous laughter* I meant for that to happen.
Charles: *keyboard smashes and then restarts*
Camilla: *calmly starts over from beginning"
Bunny: HENRY THE PIANO IS BROKEN
425 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
i stand by the fact that boris pavlikovsky was probably not as cool or as mysterious that theo made him out to be. theo was just raised in upper middle class new york and thinks anyone who doesn’t have a stick up their ass is like, peak coolness. boris in reality is probably some gangly kid who runs his mouth and overshares abt everything.
887 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
South Indian Aesthetic
Special Tags for : @white-poppie @nerdreader @kagaz-ki-kashti @ramayantika @papenathys @whitepadi @almondswirls @meherjaaan @pinkpanthr @sanskritam @chandajaan @gulab-ja-moon @postcardpdf @kajalgf @kaju-pista @kajra-re @manwalaage @prabhmeetkaur @paneerlajwanti @rihaayi @aslipasta @callmebyyournaam @nokhushionlygam @jalebipdf
235 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
Chiamaka Adebayo
Tumblr media
38 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
The Scooby-Doo gang if they had Instagram
Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media Tumblr media
227 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
Tumblr media
♠️
455 notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
hellfire crew
Tumblr media Tumblr media
13K notes · View notes
sam-pvmind · 2 years
Text
in defense of bunny corcoran
Donna Tartt’s The Secret History is a classic murder mystery, and Bunny is the classic victim: unpalatable enough on the surface so that his killers can  pretend not to miss him, claim that he had it coming, and spin excuses justifying what they did. It’s easy not to like him, easier than it is not to like the others, who are constantly romanticized and glorified through Richard’s narration– Bunny is loud, annoying, hedonistic, prejudiced, a money-waster, and above all, un-aesthetic. A simple scroll through his Tumblr tag reveals hundreds of anti-Bunny posts writing him off as the worst character in The Secret History. Yet as frustrating as he is, the fact that he wears all of his flaws on his sleeve actually makes him the most decent character in the novel. 
The Secret History is about deception and delusion, and the message it conveys about hidden truths is far from flattering. The story is a scathing satire of academic elitism, revealing that the things which seem the prettiest are often the ugliest on the inside. “Beauty is terror” drives a group of rational students to commit the unspeakable; “live forever” obscures the finality and significance of wasted life. The main characters are all two-faced– Richard the voyeuristic innocent, Julian the fallible immortal–  starting out with flawless facades which fall away to reveal hideous truths as the plot progresses. Camilla, the beauty, is passive; Henry, the leader, is cold; Francis, the thinker, is weak; Charles, the loyal, is vicious. Bunny is the notable exception. He has no tragic backstory or dark secret– actually, he has nothing to hide at all, because everyone already knows exactly who he is. 
If Bunny has a fatal flaw, it is that he appears to be the only one capable of seeing the absurdism in The Secret History in an unromantic light: this leads him directly, though undeservedly, to his death. Everything is a joke to him, a quality which incessantly irritates his friends. He does not take Classics– their lifestyle; their raison d’etre– seriously; he makes a mockery of the form by typing his essays triple-spaced. His tweed jacket is frayed and stained; he chews pink bubble gum and has a honking laugh. Bunny’s very presence in the clique ruins its ‘dark academia’ aesthetic which Tumblr loves to glorify (entirely missing the point of the novel)– there’s a reason why he is left out of so many fan-made edits and moodboards. Even his insults are delivered tongue-in-cheek, as he starts to lash out against a fate which he knows is inescapable. Bunny dies laughing, which is perhaps the most grievous jab at the group that he was capable of delivering. They fall apart after he is gone because it is painfully clear that everything they stood for, everything they were, was a joke all along. 
Bunny spirals in the weeks before his death: he’s drunk, incoherent, suffocating under the weight of being forced to keep the secret of the farmer’s murder. And, of course, he verbally attacks each member of the group, trying to get at their most sensitive weakness: Francis’s gayness, Camilla’s femininity, Richard’s poverty. He’s a deeply unpopular character primarily because of the prejudices he so openly owns– but these attacks are personal far more so than they are universal. The point is not Bunny’s homophobia or sexism– values which, it could be argued, he seems to mock or parody as he does Classics– but the fact that he feels directly threatened by his own friends. In the letter discovered late in the novel, Bunny reveals that he knew Henry was planning to kill him and that everyone else was in on it long before his actual murder. He begs for help from Julian because he knows, months in advance, that all of his so-called ‘friends’ hated him and wanted him dead. How can anyone, even someone far less flawed than Bunny, reconcile with a truth as harsh as this? He copes poorly, but his last weeks are a cry for help, not a justification for his murder. 
“Bunny got what was coming for him” is a take that can be found in several different iterations online; some in jest, some not. To that I answer: those who seriously believe it are as gullible and idealistic as Richard, who allowed himself to be convinced that being annoying was a crime punishable by death. Bunny was not a killer (which is more than can be said for the rest of the characters in The Secret History): he was somebody’s brother and somebody’s son, a normal person and a life recklessly and pointlessly thrown away. His controversial honesty dismantled the Greek ideals which his ‘friends’ idolized, and for that, at least, we must value him. 
697 notes · View notes