Last Seen Blogs
cat-of-starlight
Elenaer
notmadjustlightlysalted-blog
Marauders
lgcasami
phoenix
vonkaempfer
MUTTON, FRESH MUTTON!
acrolius
acrolius
Text
ENTP, talking to a group, suddenly turns to INTP: you're not gonna like this
ENTP: *says it anyways*
14 notes
·
View notes
Text
Entp × Intp Dynamic in Fiction
Kuroo + Kenma (Haikyuu)
Klaus + Ben (the umbrella academy)
Orochimaru + Kabuto (Naruto)
Moriarty + Sherlock (Sherlock)
Cheshire Cat + Alice (Alice in Wonderland)
Gen + Senku (Dr. Stone)
Ren + Futaba (Persona 5)
Tony + Bruce (Marvel)
94 notes
·
View notes
Text
the average Ne-Ti, Ti-Ne conversation
ENTP: have you ever been to a brothel?
INTP: I live there
ENTP: listen, if prostitutes are together outside is it considered a brothel?
INTP: no. If doctors are together outside is it considered a hospital?
ENTP: well, it could be an improvised- no, I guess not.
(5 minutes later)
INTP: if all food can be classified as sandwiches, soups or salads and a fruit salad is salad what is a single fruit?
ENTP: an ingredient
INTP: not an option. soup, salad, sammie.
ENTP: well...
INTP: what is juice?
ENTP: a soup, because it's water and vegetables.
INTP: but what about watermelon juice? you don't add water.
ENTP: ... good question
INTP: how much can you cut up fruit before it becomes soup? if it ever does?
ENTP: well, how many prostitutes can stand in the same place before it gets to be called a brothel? if it ever does? is it the same for doctors and hospitals?
INTP: ...
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
Tritype + instinct theory
Because of how tritype theory was developed without instinct theory in mind, there is no widely accepted theory on how instincts should work in the tritype.
My personal favourite theory is the one that goes like this:
If you are a 1w9 sp/so 153, then the 2nd type in your tritype will take the 2nd instinct in your stack. And the 3rd type in your tritype will now take the 3rd instinct in your stack. So then sp/so 153 would be SP1, SO5, SX3.
This theory worked very well with me and my friends
(I'm a 451 SP4, SO5, SX1)
A friend who's so/sp 629 (SO6, SP2, SX9)
A friend who's sx/sp 541 (SX5, SP4, SO1)
A friend who's so/sp 217 (SO2, SP1, SX7)
And a friend who's so/sx 638 (SO6, SX3, SP8)
What do you guys think of this theory?
#I always think about this because it works perfectly with me being a sp3 so5 sx9#enneagram#typology#instinctual variants#tritype
33 notes
·
View notes
Text
people often mistake self care in any form or shape as inherently equivalent to self preservation instinct. it's not.
sp is primarily concerned with survival and resource needs. most of the time, self care will only become a concern when it's the necessary resource or a tool to resource gathering. otherwise, it's a waste of time and energy and hardly will become a concern.
a sp who doesn't rely on their looks for survival will probably not invest time in money in extensive beauty care. a sp with no signs of illness of fragile health state won't probably be concerned about eating and exercising much. a sp whose mental health do not affect their productivity may not be concerned about health care management.
11 notes
·
View notes
Text
that's not really how the instincts work. sx does take 1on1 connections in account but it's not strictly about that, nor the motives you mention necessarily come out of a place of sx blindness.
hyperfocus body image, for example, can come from all 3 instintcs depending on why you focus on body image. and it's important to notice that insinctual variants work as stacks, not individual traits.
a "put your feelings first" mentality and how you manifest it could belong to any stack depending on context.
like, in our current social setting "fuck what other think about you" is very uncharacteristic of sp doms because socialization is a major resource font nowadays. a sp dom who thinks like that could only be already extremely resourceful and not depend on connections for their personal survival. a skincare routine could be a sx rooted pursuit of aesthetics, a so need to build a social identity or a sp need to conform to standards or demands in order to benefit from it.
i think a lot of gen Z grows up to be Sp dom and Sx blind because of the general stance like “put ya feelings first” and “take your skincare routine as serious as a religion belief” and “fuck others think abt yourself in the first place” and extreme focus on body image and extreme focus on eating habits and general SP stuff and then on the other hand there’s so much focus on world climate, world poverty, and the big humanity picture. Following, 1on1 connections are put aside with stances like “you don’t need another half YOU ARE YOUR OTHER HALF” and less and less tolerance for putting up with your partner - which brings us full circle back and SP matters being of utmost importance.
I mean correct me if i’m wrong i’m eager to hear your opinion on this
43 notes
·
View notes
Text
I can't confirm or deny but as a certified sx blind (sp/so) I do tend to have a more good neighborhood people pleasing-ish approach to life which 100% means sacrificing intimacy.
I don't invest in having a bestfriend. I have a handful of close ("best", "real") friends but I don't feel comfortable having an absolute bestfriend. that's a concept that falls apart when it comes to a romantic partner, in that case not only I'm comfortable having my partner as my closest confidant and someone I can share everything with but also I expect it. and even then, it would be take me a long time to develop that level of trust with someone. with everyone else, including family and friends, i'm very selective with how much I share and how much I lie or omit. i think it's just a general security problem, a way to avoid dislike and conflict among relationships and to protect myself from potential attacks from malicious people. the way I see it, if a partner dislikes you for being genuine you're not supposed to have them as a partner, if you have conflict with a partner is reasonable to wait energy and resources solving that conflict because you expect a long-term bond and a partner is not supposed to expose you in any way as to harm you.
is it a sx-last thing to only crave sx 'psychological nudity' with their partner and not friends
and why would it be? is it because they feel the need for psychological nudity only when they are in a relationship? do they feel that that part of themselves only should come out when they are in a relationship?
I'm confused, because I see it as something that can be a bonding tactic, as well as something I crave for in friendships and relationships and tend to try to create.
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
All instinctual variants explained really well:
Written before I understood what the variants meant, not accurate at ALL
Sp-dom
Pre-occupied with own mortality
Funny in a sad way
Money = way to stay alive
“Special interest”
Thinks they ooze cool
Your anxious friend who never learned how to smile with their mouth open and not look like a milk carton kid/bitch
Sp-blind
Ranges from “silly y un poquito stupid” to “makes bad dangerous choices” depending on how you view their sp-blindness
Burns out and crashes
Your friend who’s gonna fail out of college
So-dom
Can make you feel comfortable
Dumb happy
Sometimes has parental lawful honors program energy
Can be a socialite monster for sure
Would structure personality around their friends
“I need everybody to like me or I’m gonna die”
Cult vibes
Your friend who joined a club and got really down for recruitment
So-blind
Maybe emo or anti-mainstream culture
Weirdo
Might make something groundbreaking and innovative
People = tools that can help fuel the sx or sp
Your friend who hasn’t changed in like six years
I’m not so-blind I have no idea someone speak to this please
Sx-dom
Has some vision or cause that they’re a huge asshole about
Good intuition
“We gotta follow the high!! We gotta go where the high is!!”
Let’s their emotions drive them forward
Addiction prone? Maybe?
Your friend who you’re afraid to say “hey fuckin chill man” because they’re so weird and intense about the high they’re on
Sx-blind
Spends a lotta time thinking “who am I???”
Spends more time thinking “what do I want???”
The NPC of stability
You remember when Robert Pattinson was announced to play the Batman and we all said “oh no absolutely not what the fuck”
Your friend who doesn’t fuck
218 notes
·
View notes
Text
INTP: let's compare our hand sizes, for science
ENTP: how is that science?
INTP: oh, so you understand science better than I do now?
ENTP: I'm just saying that this doesn't look a lot like science, I mean, our hands are obviously different sizes we don't need to press them together like- oh
INTP: I'm leaving
ENTP: wait, no, come back I wanna science :(
303 notes
·
View notes
Text
INTP: okay, I got you a painkiller
ENTP: thanks, am I supposed to bite it?
INTP: what? no, just swallow it
ENTP: I kinda want to bite it
INTP: you won't
ENTP: I bit it
INTP: what the fuck? *laughing ass off* no fucking way. just no. what does it taste like?
ENTP, in the verge of dying: it's burning my tongue *spits* I'll wash my mouth
INTP: wait, what is it made of? oh goodness, it's fucking acid. what does it taste like?
ENTP: awful, do you have something to eat?
INTP: I have, uh, mandarin
ENTP: are you kidding me?
174 notes
·
View notes
Text
Enfp x Intj
Couple scenario
Intj: So we agree that we both don't want children, right?
Enfp: Right. Too much work, pain and sleepless nights that we both don't need.
Intj: Yes, and I want to focus on my career and help you with yours.
Enfp: totally! I do like kids, but I don't want to waste my time taking care of them. *nods furiously*
Intj: Yeah. Then, we are settled.
*silence*
Enfp: Can we adopt a dog, tho?
Intj: And a cat.
Enfp: deal.
697 notes
·
View notes
Text
ENFJ: *taking pictures of the friendgroup*
INFP and INTP: posing like they're about to kiss
ENFJ: sTOP BEING GAY I'M TRYING TO TAKE PICS
90 notes
·
View notes
Text
INTP: *smacks ENTP*
ENTP: *smacks back*
ENTP: ... I am so sorry.
71 notes
·
View notes