hermioneemmawatsonlookalike
Emily K Granfer Blog
Emily Helenor Grannfer blog where I post things I think about in believe
11 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Last Seen Blogs
andywonkatattoo
And Wonka Tattoo
shadyhologramgoatee
Life Without...Limitations
flashbackharry
jude(she/her)
indyang317
LOVE WINS
mariondanslorage
Marion dans l'orage
Text
To make a dress exactly like this, you will need the following materials:
A mannequin
A piece of pink and purple fabric (about 6 yards)
A sewing machine
A pair of scissors
A needle and thread
A measuring tape
A chalk or fabric marker
A sewing pattern (optional)
Here are the steps involved:
Take your measurements and use a sewing pattern (optional) to create a bodice and skirt pattern.
Cut out the bodice and skirt pieces from the fabric.
Sew the bodice pieces together, right sides facing.
Sew the skirt pieces together, right sides facing.
Attach the bodice to the skirt.
Add the ruffles to the skirt.
Hem the dress.
Add any finishing touches, such as lace or beading.
Here are some additional tips:
Use a lightweight fabric for the dress, such as chiffon or organza.
Be sure to press the seams as you go to make the dress look neat and professional.
If you are not comfortable sewing, you can hire a seamstress to help you make the dress.
If you don’t have a mannequin here are steps for you kind of people
Sure, I can give you some steps on how to make the dress without a mannequin. However, it will be more challenging and require more trial and error. Here are some tips:
Start by making a muslin mockup of the dress. This is a practice version of the dress made out of inexpensive fabric. This will help you get the fit right before you cut into your good fabric.
Once you are happy with the fit of the muslin mockup, you can start cutting out the pieces for the dress from your good fabric.
As you are sewing the dress together, pin the pieces in place as you go. This will help you keep the seams aligned and prevent the fabric from puckering.
Be sure to try on the dress frequently as you are sewing it to make sure it is still fitting well.
Once the dress is sewn together, you can add any finishing touches, such as lace or beading.
Here are some additional tips for making the dress without a mannequin:
Use a stretchy fabric so that you can get a better fit.
Make sure the fabric is not too heavy or it will be difficult to sew.
Use a lightweight interfacing to give the dress some structure.
Be patient and take your time. It may take a few tries to get the fit right.
I hope this helps!
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
# Why The New Harry Potter TV Series Might Not Live Up to Expectations
In the world of fantasy literature, few series have managed to captivate audiences and create a global phenomenon quite like J.K. Rowling's Harry Potter. The seven books followed the magical journey of Harry, Ron, and Hermione through their years at Hogwarts, and their struggle against the dark wizard Voldemort. The series' popularity led to eight successful film adaptations, theme parks, spin-off books, movies, and even a stage play.
The Harry Potter films, released between 2001 and 2011, were a massive success, grossing billions of dollars worldwide, and creating stars out of the young cast - Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, and Rupert Grint. Their performances, along with those of the rest of the cast, became so iconic that for many fans, they are the definitive interpretations of those characters.
Now, there are plans to create a Harry Potter TV series. While this might initially seem like an exciting prospect for fans, there are several reasons why it might not live up to the high bar set by the books and the original films.
## 1. The Films Were Already Perfect
The Harry Potter films were meticulously crafted, with a high level of detail that brought the magic of the books to life. The majestic Hogwarts castle, the thrilling Quidditch matches, the terrifying creatures and spells - all were visually stunning and exceeded the expectations of fans. This can make it difficult for a new adaptation to compete.
Moreover, the films were not just about spectacle, they also captured the emotional depth and complexity of the characters and their relationships. The performances of the actors, especially the trio of Radcliffe, Watson, and Grint, were spot on, making us laugh, cry, and cheer them on.
## 2. Difficulty in Recasting Iconic Characters
The characters of Harry, Ron, and Hermione are deeply ingrained in the public consciousness. For many, Daniel Radcliffe is Harry Potter, Emma Watson is Hermione Granger, and Rupert Grint is Ron Weasley. Any new actors in these roles will inevitably be compared to their predecessors, making it a herculean task to make these characters their own. Capturing the same chemistry and camaraderie that the original trio had will be a tall order.
## 3. Oversaturation and Franchise Fatigue
The Harry Potter universe has already been extensively explored through various mediums. Beyond the original seven books and eight films, there have been spin-off books, films (Fantastic Beasts series), a stage play (Harry Potter and the Cursed Child), video games, and more. The world of Harry Potter is rich and expansive, but there is a risk of oversaturation. The audience might already be experiencing franchise fatigue, making them less inclined to engage with a new series.
In conclusion, while a Harry Potter TV series might seem like a good idea on paper, it has significant hurdles to overcome. The original films were so successful and beloved that any new adaptation will inevitably be compared to them, and may not stand up to scrutiny. The characters are so iconic that recasting them will be a monumental task, and with the franchise already so expansive, there is a risk of oversaturation and franchise fatigue. Only time will tell if the series can overcome these challenges and capture the magic of the original books and films.
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hi It is me Emily Hellenora Granfer,
Ladies and gents, esteemed mates, and fellow Londoners,
Today, we find ourselves in a right pickle, discussing a rather peculiar trend that's been sweeping across the pond in the good ol' United States. I'm here to shed some light on those anti-transgender bills and legislation, my dear chaps. Now, whilst these measures claim to protect women's rights or preserve traditional values, we simply must take a closer look at the consequences they might bring forth. In this jolly speech, we shall delve into why these anti-trans bills might just backfire and leave a rather embarrassing stain on the trousers of those who championed them.
First and foremost, let's have a good laugh at the misplacement of priorities, shall we? Instead of tackling pressing issues like healthcare, infrastructure, or education, our dear American friends seem to be wasting their precious time and resources on bills that disproportionately target a marginalized community. It's like trying to find Big Ben in New York City! I say, it's high time they focus on what truly matters and leave the poor transgender folk be.
Now, let's talk about the atmosphere these anti-trans bills create, shall we? It's not the most welcoming, I must say. By sending a clear message of intolerance and discrimination, they're creating a rather dodgy environment for their transgender mates. And what happens when you make folks feel unwelcome? Mental health issues, my friends. Anxiety, depression, and a general sense of gloominess. Blimey, they sure can do better than that! Let's strive for an inclusive society that values diversity and respects the rights of all, regardless of their gender identity. It's not rocket science, you know.
Oh, but wait, there's more! These anti-trans bills can have some jolly economic repercussions as well. You see, lots of businesses these days are rather keen on diversity and inclusivity. They understand that embracing different perspectives and identities isn't just the morally right thing to do, but it's also good for business, innit? So, when a state decides to pass these discriminatory laws, it's like waving a big red bus to these companies. They might just pack their bags and head for friendlier pastures, taking their jobs and economic contributions with them. Now, that's not very smart, is it?
And let's not forget the legal challenges that await these anti-trans bills. Constitutional battles, my darlings! They can drain their public resources faster than you can say "cheeky Nando's." Not to mention the damage it does to their dear reputation. Do they really want to be known as the place that wasted time, money, and effort defending laws that target a specific community? I think not, my friends.
But fear not, for there is hope amidst this chaos! The passage of these anti-trans bills has ignited a spark within the LGBTQ+ community and its allies. It's like trying to put out a fire with a cuppa tea, I tell you! The more they try to limit the rights of transgender individuals, the stronger the opposition becomes, united in their fight for equality and justice. So, let's embrace this solidarity, my dear mates, and show those who championed these bills that their actions have only strengthened our resolve.
In conclusion, my jolly good audience, let us reflect upon the unintended consequences of these anti-trans bills across the pond. They divert attention from pressing issues, foster discrimination, and harm their local economies. It's time for our American friends to wake up and smell the roses, or in their case, the tea! Inclusivity, respect, and equal rights for all, regardless of gender identity, are not just mere buzzwords. They are the very foundations of a progressive and enlightened society.
So, let us stand tall, raise our cups of tea, and proclaim, "No more nonsense, no more discrimination!" Together, we can create a future where every individual is valued, respected, and free to be their fabulous selves. Let's give these anti-trans bills a proper East End send-off and show them the door.
Thank you, my dear mates, and cheerio!
19 notes
·
View notes
Text
*J.K. Rowling's Transphobic Views Are Invalid and Harmful**
J.K. Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series, has been criticized for her transphobic views. In a series of tweets and blog posts, Rowling has argued that sex is a biological reality and that transgender women are not women. She has also supported Maya Forstater, a researcher who was fired for making transphobic comments.
Rowling's views are based on a misunderstanding of transgender identity. Transgender people are those whose gender identity does not match the sex they were assigned at birth. This can be due to a variety of factors, including biology, psychology, and social expectations.
There is a growing body of scientific evidence that supports the validity of transgender identity. Studies have shown that transgender people have brains that are more similar to the brains of their identified gender than to the brains of their assigned sex. Transgender people also have lower rates of mental health problems than cisgender people, once they are able to live authentically.
Rowling's views are harmful because they contribute to the stigma and discrimination faced by transgender people. They also make it more difficult for transgender people to access the healthcare and other resources they need.
In addition to her own views, Rowling has also supported the book *Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters* by Abigail Shrier. This book is a collection of anecdotes about young women who have detransitioned, or who have changed their minds about their gender identity. Shrier argues that these young women are being influenced by a "transgender craze" and that they are making a mistake by transitioning.
However, the book has been criticized by transgender advocates and experts. They argue that Shrier's book is based on a false premise and that it does not accurately represent the experiences of transgender people.
Rowling's support for Shrier's book is further evidence of her transphobic views. It shows that she is willing to promote harmful and inaccurate information about transgender people.
It is important to challenge Rowling's views and to call out her transphobia. We need to make it clear that her views are not acceptable and that they do not reflect the reality of transgender identity.
We also need to support transgender people and their rights. We need to fight for their right to live authentically and to be treated with respect.
**Why Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe Don't Want to Be in the Harry Potter TV Series as Different Characters**
Emma Watson and Daniel Radcliffe have both said that they do not want to be in the upcoming Harry Potter TV series as different characters. Watson has said that she wants to "let the fans' imaginations run wild" and that she doesn't want to "muddy the waters" by appearing in the series. Radcliffe has said that he is "excited to see what other people do with it" and that he doesn't want to "take away from the experience" of the new cast.
It is also possible that Watson and Radcliffe are hesitant to participate in the series because of Rowling's transphobic views. Watson has been a vocal supporter of transgender rights, and she may not want to be associated with a project that is created by someone who holds harmful views about transgender people. Radcliffe has also spoken out against transphobia, and he may not want to be involved in a project that could be seen as supporting Rowling's views.
Ultimately, the decision of whether or not to participate in the Harry Potter TV series is a personal one for Watson and Radcliffe. They have both made it clear that they are not interested in appearing in the series, and their reasons for doing so are understandable.
41 notes
·
View notes
Text
Title: Why It's Time to Rethink Support for Amber Heard: A Closer Look at the Johnny Depp Court Case
Introduction:
The highly publicized legal battle between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard has stirred significant controversy in recent years. With Heard's recent loss in court, it becomes crucial to reevaluate the unwavering support extended to her by some individuals and sections of the media. This article aims to shed light on the reasons why it is reasonable to reassess one's support for Heard and to advocate for fair treatment and unbiased reporting for both parties involved.
Presumption of Innocence and the Media:
The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" is a cornerstone of any fair legal system. Unfortunately, media coverage and public opinion tend to be heavily influenced by the court of public sentiment rather than the court of law. In the case of Depp vs. Heard, it is regrettable to observe how some media outlets and public figures have unquestioningly supported Heard without considering the need for impartial investigation and fair representation of both sides.
Lack of Transparency and Manipulation of Facts:
Throughout the legal proceedings, there have been allegations of manipulation and distortion of facts by both parties. However, it is important to note that Depp's evidence and the testimonies of witnesses raised legitimate concerns about the accuracy of Heard's claims. The court's ruling against Heard suggests that there were inconsistencies in her statements and casts doubt on her credibility.
Selective Belief and Gender Bias:
One of the concerning aspects surrounding this case is the tendency to believe women over men solely based on gender. While it is crucial to acknowledge and address issues related to domestic violence, it is equally important to approach each case with fairness, impartiality, and a commitment to evidence-based conclusions. The assumption that Heard should be believed without question due to her gender undermines the principles of fairness and equality.
A Deterrent Effect on Future Cases:
The unquestioning support given to Heard despite mounting evidence and the subsequent court ruling can have a detrimental impact on future cases involving victims of domestic abuse. By blindly supporting Heard, society risks discouraging legitimate victims from coming forward, fearing that their claims might be met with skepticism and doubt. Ensuring a fair and impartial process for all parties involved is crucial to maintaining justice.
Rethinking Support:
Given the court's ruling against Heard and the concerns raised about the veracity of her claims, it is important to reconsider one's support for her. Supporting someone solely based on their gender or assuming their innocence without considering all the available evidence undermines the principles of justice and fairness. Instead, it is necessary to advocate for a comprehensive investigation, an unbiased assessment of evidence, and a commitment to a fair legal process for both parties involved.
Conclusion:
The Johnny Depp vs. Amber Heard court case has been a contentious and highly publicized affair. However, blindly supporting Heard without considering the evidence and the court's ruling undermines the principles of justice and fairness. It is crucial to promote a balanced and unbiased approach, encouraging comprehensive investigations, fair legal proceedings, and equitable treatment for all parties involved. By doing so, we can create a society that prioritizes truth, fairness, and equality, irrespective of gender.
0 notes
Text
Sure, here is an article about why Apple needs to come out with a new version of Siri that is similar to Google Bard and ChatGPT:
**Apple Needs to Update Siri to Compete with Google Bard and ChatGPT**
Siri was once the gold standard for voice assistants, but it has fallen behind in recent years. Google Bard and ChatGPT are two new voice assistants that are quickly gaining popularity. They are more accurate, more comprehensive, and more engaging than Siri.
There are several reasons why Apple needs to update Siri. First, Siri is not as accurate as Google Bard or ChatGPT. Siri often misunderstands what users are saying, and it can be frustrating to have to repeat yourself multiple times. Second, Siri is not as comprehensive as Google Bard or ChatGPT. Siri can only answer a limited number of questions, and it cannot carry on a conversation as well as Google Bard or ChatGPT. Third, Siri is not as engaging as Google Bard or ChatGPT. Siri is often robotic and lifeless, while Google Bard and ChatGPT are more human-like and engaging.
Apple needs to update Siri to compete with Google Bard and ChatGPT. The new version of Siri should be more accurate, more comprehensive, and more engaging. It should also be able to learn and improve over time. If Apple can update Siri, it will be a valuable asset for its users.
Here are some specific ways that Apple could improve Siri:
* **Improve accuracy.** Siri should be able to understand what users are saying even when they are speaking in a noisy environment or with an accent.
* **Expand knowledge base.** Siri should be able to answer a wider range of questions, including more complex and open-ended questions.
* **Make it more engaging.** Siri should be able to carry on a conversation more naturally and be more responsive to user input.
* **Enable machine learning.** Siri should be able to learn and improve over time based on user feedback.
If Apple can make these improvements, Siri will be a valuable asset for its users. It will be a more accurate, comprehensive, and engaging voice assistant that can help users with a variety of tasks.
In addition to the above, Apple could also consider the following features for a new version of Siri:
* **Multi-device support.** Siri should be able to work across all of Apple's devices, including iPhones, iPads, Macs, and Apple Watches.
* **Better integration with third-party apps.** Siri should be able to control third-party apps, such as Spotify and Uber.
* **More privacy features.** Siri should be more secure and private, with users having more control over their data.
By making these improvements, Apple could create a new version of Siri that is truly groundbreaking. It would be a voice assistant that is more accurate, comprehensive, engaging, and private than anything that is currently available.
0 notes
Text
, I have been following the political climate in the United States closely. It is no secret that the Trump administration has had close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and it is becoming increasingly clear that he has a hold on a certain group of individuals within the Republican party.
These individuals, often referred to as "MAGA Republicans," have been vocal supporters of President Trump and his policies, even in the face of overwhelming evidence of corruption and wrongdoing. It is my belief that Putin has a hand in this, and that he has been able to manipulate these individuals to serve his own interests.
The first question that comes to mind is why Putin would want to interfere in American politics in the first place. The answer is simple: he wants to weaken the United States and increase his own power and influence on the global stage. By sowing discord and division within the country, he is able to pursue his own agenda and advance his own interests.
One way he has been able to do this is by using social media to spread propaganda and misinformation. He has been able to target vulnerable individuals who are susceptible to his messages, and has been able to create a network of supporters who are willing to do his bidding.
These individuals, often referred to as "useful idiots," are not necessarily aware of the bigger picture and the role they are playing in Putin's game. They may genuinely believe in their cause, but they are being used as pawns in a larger scheme.
It is concerning that so many people have been taken in by this propaganda and are willing to support policies that are detrimental to the country as a whole. It is also concerning that more people are not speaking out against this and calling it out for what it is.
We need to be vigilant and aware of the tactics that are being used against us. We need to be critical thinkers and question the information that is presented to us. We need to hold our leaders accountable and demand transparency and honesty.
Putin may have his useful idiots working for him, but we have the power to expose the façade and fight back against his efforts to undermine our democracy. Let us stand together and defend the values that make our country great.
0 notes
Text
Good evening everyone,
I am here today to talk about a topic that is deeply important to me: the discrimination and mistreatment of transgender individuals, especially trans women, by some members of the Republican party.
It is disheartening to see some Republicans resorting to harmful and derogatory language to describe trans women, referring to them as "men dressed as women." This language is not only hurtful, but it also perpetuates harmful stereotypes and misconceptions about trans individuals.
What is even more ironic is that these same individuals who attack trans women rarely talk about trans men. This shows a clear bias and a lack of understanding of the challenges that trans individuals face.
It is time that we recognize that trans women are women, and they deserve the same rights and respect as any other woman. They are not a threat to anyone in the bathroom, and they are simply trying to live their lives authentically and safely.
The argument that trans women pose a threat to cisgender women in bathrooms is baseless and harmful. We must work to create a society where everyone, regardless of their gender identity, can live their lives without fear of persecution or oppression.
Transphobia is a form of hate that has no place in our society. We must stand up against discrimination and work towards a world where all individuals are treated with dignity and respect.
In conclusion, trans women are not men dressed as women; they are women, plain and simple. We must work to create a world where all individuals, regardless of their gender identity, can live their lives without fear of discrimination. Thank you.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Dear friends, I am Emily Hellennora Grannfer, and I'm here today to talk to you about an issue that is very close to my heart. It is an issue that affects millions of people around the world. I'm talking about the rights of transgender women and the L G B T Q community. As someone who has always believed in equality and justice, it pains me to see the kind of hate and discrimination that is being directed towards transgender women and the L G B T Q community. It is especially disheartening to see that some Republicans are actively working to undermine the rights of this marginalized group of people.
JK Rowling, once a champion for equality and inclusivity, has fallen for the Republican trap and has become an outspoken opponent of transgender rights. Her views on this issue are not only misguided, but also dangerous by perpetuating harmful myths about trans women, she's contributing to a climate of fear and hatred towards this already marginalized group.
It is not just JK Rowling who is guilty of perpetuating harmful myths about trans women. When Republicans engage in debates with people who support trans women, they often resort to interrupting and talking over their opponents. This is not a win. It is a desperate attempt to silence those who disagree with them. Trans women are not drag queens or men in dresses. They are women just like any other women. They deserve the same rights and protections as any other women, and they should not be made to feel like criminals or threats to society. It is heartening to see that many people, including Daniel Radcliffe and Rupert Grin are standing up for the rights of trans women and the L G B T Q community.
As Emma Watson once said, if not me, who? If not now, when? We must all take a stand and speak out against hate and discrimination wherever we see it. In conclusion, I urge everyone to take a stand for what is right, and just let us stand with transgender women and the L G B T Q community and work towards a more inclusive and just society. Thank you.
26 notes
·
View notes