feral-radfem
Just As Suspected
⚡Sister: @Sunn-Bunny⚡
Ignore the typos, I voice-to-text all of my post.
I don't care about your opinion of me.
15233 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Last Seen Blogs
epicnessinajar-blog-blog
Me Against Them❤
mangosteine
ᘛ⁐̤ᕐᐷ
gayforkatiemcgrath
Gay For Katie McGrath
gloria-and-grey-blog
Ask Gloriteru
Text
It's warming up so let me give y'all your yearly summer reminder: if you see a "ladies get in free or reduced drink prices" at bars this is not a rare form of "female privilege" it is because you are the product that is on sale.
The bars are advertising to men that there will be a lot of women there who will be drunk. No (osa) man wants to go to a bar that's a sausage fest, so bars know that letting y'all get intoxicated for free (making you vulnerable and providing incentive for you to come) makes male paying customers come in. [This is also why they are allowing teenagers in with shitty fake IDs. They know you are underage girls, they just don't care about your safety. If they could advertise they have underage drunk girls there, they would. Stay Home.]
These spaces typically have an air of male entitlement that's stronger than other bars because they feel like they are already paying for your time and that you owe them for getting the free drinks. That your sexual availability to them is "part of the deal" for them having to pay to get in or to drink and you not having to. All the men are already walking around with the "I bought you would drink so you owe me" mentality in bars like this. So, while we get into the fun seasons of the year, remember to avoid places that purposely set themselves up as a lion's den. If they are advertising that a lot of women will be there, they are not doing it for women. They are doing it to use you as bait to catch more paying customers who will feel sexually entitled to you.
Be selective where you show up and allow yourself to be vulnerable. Have fun, but mitigate some of the risks you're going to be exposed to if you can.
614 notes
·
View notes
Text
I've considered deleting my feminist social media recently and it's not because I have less faith in radical feminism. I just have little to no faith in a majority of you.
I'm figuring out by now that I may have held y'all in too high esteem with too many expectations y'all refuse to even attempt to reach.
Thought crimes are fake and inconsequential, unfortunately for a lot of women here, so is thought activism. Having feminist opinions means nothing when you only regurgitate it to women who already agree with you and make no efforts to even try and uphold any of the feminist actions you supposedly agree with. Y'all only agree in theory, right, not practice? Okay, whatever.
Political activism is the most effective locally, anyways. I'm starting to believe this is a waste of the only resource I can never get back: my time.
#lily responds#radical feminism#I am so disappointed in so many of you#between the erotica and the divisive who really is a woman bullshit#there may be hope for women but there may not be any hope for y'all#I have the ability to make actual change in my local community for the women here and I have.#because I'm an actual activist and an actual feminist I don't really need these online spaces and it's not worth#attempting to share knowledge and experience with women who don't give enough of a f*** to do more than regurgitate#points they hear made on social media and not understand why those are our stance#just having the right opinion is not enough not if you never let it leave your head#I'm probably just in my feelings right now because I keep seeing the same stupid f****** opinions no matter#how many people I soft block#it may be giving me the false impression that a majority of you hold these anti-feminist positions#or it's the completely correct perception and most of you do hold these thoughts and positions on the subjects#meaning this feminism branch is just as useless as lip feminism and because you're all unmotivated to do anything real#make any sacrifices that make you slightly uncomfortable a little less hedonistic even if it's better for you in the long run#even if it helps alleviate the boot from all women's back#so many of y'all just don't care and realistically it's heartbreaking
47 notes
·
View notes
Text
Asking women who voluntarily become activist for women's liberation to do any political activism is turning them into an object? You don't have to be a feminist, op.
However, I don't give a fuck about this argument. Don't be celibate/do be celibate, be happy with whatever consequences come with whatever choice you make. On either side. I don't fucking care right now.
I am not going to sit here and read post after post where fellow radfems think lesbian and bisexual women have to withhold our valid (identical) feminist criticism because you don't think it's fair or think it's patronizing to hear it from somebody who isn't just like you. That we have to suffer just like you before we say the exact same shit straight women have been saying for decades. Why is it less valuable coming from us? What makes it so insulting to hear the truth from a lesbian rather than a fellow straight woman? Do the statistics change when it comes out of our mouths? Do the solutions? Those are rhetorical, the answer is no.
The feminist criticism is accurate regardless of whether it's coming out of a straight woman's mouth, a bisexual woman's mouth, or a lesbian's mouth. It would be equally true if a man said it. Some of you really need to realize that radical feminism isn't a heterosexual woman's movement. It's a liberation movement for all women. I don't give a shit about your bruised ego when I repeat the foundational theories and solutions that radical feminists have been passing around for 50 fucking years. If you can only absorb feminist critique and resolutions if they're coming from heterosexual women fundamentally lacking class consciousness with a huge chunk of women. It leaves you a lackluster feminist and I'm honestly tired of seeing this shit.
"If women just all went celibate and had higher standards" is the radfem version of abstinence only education
#lily responds#do lesbians not have mothers and sisters and cousins who they see struggling? do we not have valid advice and statistics to share?#do all of you really believe that none of us made sacrifices to be here?#do you think being a feminist is just natural to us#do you think it's easier less of a struggle?#I am really growing to f****** hate all of you#It's very obvious the second responder grew up in a fundamentally Conservative Christian household. I can see the biases she chose to keep#is there hope for women? maybe if y'all get y'all's f****** act together#if none of you do any feminist action of course not what do you want me to f****** say
205 notes
·
View notes
Text
if trans ppl would have started and stopped at “chill out and let me dress and present myself in a way that is most comfortable and enjoyable for me” most of their detractors wouldn’t have a leg to stand on, but instead we have people out here using cult tactics and a mob mentality to make others “unlearn” material reality so they can get more attention and validation
361 notes
·
View notes
Text
It’s so fucking funny when a die hard gendie comes into terfosphere and starts their dumbass arguments with, “Ok so we already know the chromosome thing is a bust, so let’s talk about …”
Lmaooo, the anti intellectualism that runs so rampant in their communities 💀 It’s like when flat earthers are like, “Ok so we all know the moon pictures are doctored…” NO WE DONT, YOUVE BEEN AWAY FROM NORMAL FOR SO LONG YOU FORGOT HOW TO EVEN PRETEND TO BE 😭
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Tumblr is a great source for modern twists on classic misogyny such as “you hysterical floozies have penis envy” “you’re uptight because you’re frigid and need a good fucking” and “all female characters in media must be virtuous and good examples of morals, lest they tempt women to fall into sin”
647 notes
·
View notes
Text
NO ONE IS OWED SEX
women should not have to bare the burden of male depravity. our bodies are not commodities to be used as the solution for outcast men.
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
i would like to take this oppertunity to apologize in advance for the assult upon your eyes and soul that i am about to commit.
This made my jaw drop
What happened to missgendering being literal violence and unexcusable?
And also like wtf???
467 notes
·
View notes
Text
Liberals will defend absolutely anything. And with the rise of trans and nonbinary identifying men developing more obscure, previously-unheard-of fetishes, we will see truly bizarre cases of abuse that go beyond what our legal framework is designed to tackle.
Nowhere can we see this more than with @nominal.Naomi on Twitter, a TIM who produced milk to feed his partner’s child. He also has posted many photos of said child.
Those of us with commonsense spot the red flags this immediately, but liberals say “Lol how is a parent feeding their child a form of child abuse?” Then we point out he has called his lactation abilities “cow achievement”. And that he has an OnlyFans where he cosplays as a cow. And that he has kinks for cows, milk, and breastfeeding. At the same time, he states that while he is currently feeding the baby through a bottle which he’s already put his milk in, he is hoping to be able to directly breastfeed, nipple to mouth, soon.
Liberals still say “lmao TERFs really believe that a mother breastfeeding her child is abusive.”
Two hypothetical questions for those with that line of thought (‘hypothetical’, because I already know the fucking answers):
1. What are the odds, in your opinion, of Naomi, a biological male with a fetish for cows, milk and breastfeeding, who also calls himself a mother, who already posts photos bottle-feeding and wants to directly breastfeed soon, including this child in his OnlyFans content when he is physically able to do so? Bearing in mind that the aforementioned fetishes he has are already topics of his OF. Would you still say that this is transphobes acting as morality police, trying to prevent a parent from innocuously feeding their child, if videos of said child being breastfed became Naomi’s content? Would you be okay with it so long as the child’s face was blurred and cropped out of the footage? Would you say that it is harmless?
2. Under the scenario that this does happen, is this child pornography? If not, why not? Irrespective of his sex or gender identity, this is what Naomi gets off to. He already makes porn with these themes. If it does constitute CP, how can you safeguard children with the existing legislation? You can’t make photos or videos of breastfeeding illegal. It is a biological function of mothers (actual mothers) – which then leaves the option of criminalising it solely on the grounds of men with fetishes partaking in it. But you thick-as-pigshit liberals have already made men with fetishes a protected characteristic in law. And they can sue you for anti-trans discrimination if you dare suggest that they are involving a child in their sexual fetishes.
I’m sure I will get zero answers of any kind, and liberals will do what they always do which is cycle through the four stages of unrelenting denial, before finally saying “how could we possibly have known that something like this would happen?” “how could this have even been prevented?” and act as if they are hatchlings who cracked out of their eggs into the world yesterday and have no idea how anything works.
Probably shouldn’t mention eggs though, don’t want to give ‘mommy Naomi’ any ideas. God, male sexuality is depraved. They really can make a fetish out of anything. And those of a centre-left political disposition will be right there behind them, cheering them on, ready to shut down any legitimate concerns with the classic line of “how does the way other people live their life have any affect on you? Why do you care?”
642 notes
·
View notes
Note
oof your last couple rbs did some damage. "you hate drag but you love the actors in drag, so that means drag is ok and you're a dumb hypocrite!" and "you hate pedophilic drag queens but you love pedophilic clergy/police, so that means drag is ok and you're a dumb hypocrite!" it's a textbook strawman.
Yeah those are both arguments with foundations in logical fallacies. Both also have the assumption that we're okay with one but not the other when a lot of the times the people they are talking to are not okay with either. Like the male predators and position of power in public structures and male predators in position of power at library meet and greets. I would like to say that most people don't like pedophiles regardless of their job or political position. I hope we're all against pedophilia regardless of any identifying factors of the perpetrator.
I hate drag. Gender nonconformity is great but the hip implants and fake tits make it very clear that it's females being mocked not femininity. Saying shit like serving cunt. Yeah I'm not exactly sitting here as a feminist applauding the misogyny parades. I don't think men need to try to sit here and mock the cage they put us in. So I don't love the actors in drag most of the time unless they're making a point about female impersonators.
#I'm assuming this ask is agreeing with my position but I'll be honest the first sentence was a little confusing#what do you mean that is did damage to your psyche or my reputation? because I can understand one of those but not the other#I'm assuming it's the first interpretation#ask#lily responds
3 notes
·
View notes
Note
What're your thoughts on this? https://www.tumblr.com/stele3/694253282969960448/this-this-is-the-core-of-it-this-is-why?source=share
Brain worms. You know what black women, straight women and white women all have in common that we don't have in common with prostate owners? Don't answer, that was rhetorical
It always baffles me that as a black woman I can say there is a universal experience of being black. But if I say there's a universal experience for being a woman, it's terf rhetoric
241 notes
·
View notes
Text
the distortion of "there is potential profit we did not earn" as "there is money we lost" is fascinating and disgusting to me. "megamediaconglomerate lost $1,000,000,000 to piracy this year" is a flat out lie. it is not true. they did not have a billion dollars, that they now do not have. they felt entitled to one billion dollars, that they did not have, and still do not have. it's an infuriating perversion of the truth
189K notes
·
View notes
Text
can't stress this enough to the young women on tik tok getting inundated with videos about how it's "unfair" that women have to work now bc of "feminists" that housewives were never jobless they were just unpaid. and expected to have a lot of babies. it's not free house-sitting. don't believe this propaganda don't believe it get your money!!!! money can buy you out of bad situations faster than femininity!!!!!!!
591 notes
·
View notes
Text
You're anti-porn? You just want to slut-shame women!
…Right. Okay. This is honestly one of my pet peeves. No woman should ever be abused or bullied for having sex…so why is it okay when the porn industry does it? Honestly it’s silly for me to even go through and grab screenshots. Women being called horrible names in porn is so ubiquitous that you don’t even have to go looking for shit like this. So let’s see what the porn industry is saying about women who have sex:
Women who have sex are sluts and whores
They deserve foul treatment and degradation
Sex is a punishment for “sluts and whores” who step out of line
Once a woman is deemed a slut, she should be treated poorly for life
Perhaps worst of all: women like being treated that way.
So don’t accuse me of slut-shaming because I’m anti-porn. Women deserve a sexuality where they are viewed as equals. We deserve sex where our pleasure is just as important as our partners. We don’t have to be in love when everyone we have sex with, but they should at least see us as human.
Abuse is not part of any health expression of sexuality. Period.
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
You could post hundreds of these tweets of white cis men abusing children every month.
Never a drag queen.
520 notes
·
View notes