caramel-poptick - Tumblr blog

Look at 'em go!

Kernel ~ 20 ~ She/They/Thing Bugsnax sideblog Spoilers will be untagged (since there are a LOT of them, and they might form the majority of the posts here), so please don't follow until you've already seen the end of the game! Gore and such will be tagged, but please let me know if there's something specific you need marked! My art tag is #popped-art, reblogged from @kernels-art!

1325 posts

Last active 3 hours ago

Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.

Last Seen Blogs

silo1013

any of you heard of this show called the x files

aapplianceco5

Без названия

scuffeddeejays

Scuffed Deejays

nope-i-dont-think-i-will

No I REALLY Don't Think I Will

more4mums

More4mums

caramel-poptick · 3 months

Text

can't believe this is the first thing i've using this blog for again in actual years. that's probably in the spirit of the game but damn.

it's very convenient that i just watched Yellowjackets a while back which means my brain is already in this mindset a little bit and i am doing 4D math. i am so sorry, Beffica, you're terrible and i love you, but you're probably the smartest decision for now that i could actually maybe possibly live with myself after killing

thing is, i don't necessarily need to kill everyone i'm going to eat. this scenario assumes that nobody else has been killed, but not that nobody else can be killed after, so the smartest move would be to take out somebody that is generally not well-liked by the group, and is somewhere in the medium weight range, so that we have a decent amount of food, minimal collateral damage from the fight (combat is not her expertise), and there is still enough scarcity that somebody else might look at the rapidly dwindling food supply and take matters into their own hands.

that way, i don't have to start the second fight, i can either just be an "innocent" bystander or, if they both survive, pick off whichever one suffers heavier wounds. this is probably the only way, realistically, anyone could reasonably take down either Wambus or Chandlo, who represent a much greater source of food; let someone else weaken them first, then go in for the killing blow. hell, maybe they DID succeed in killing the other person (who they either attacked first or were attacked by; in this case, it doesn't matter), which means we not only have one good food source, but a second, albeit probably much smaller one as well.

i can say it was a freak accident and a tragedy if they both fall, and if one of them survived, then i'll just pretend i was rooting for them the whole time and i came to help. i don't assume most people would just trust that, but if i killed Beffica first, then that may instill some trust in those who disliked her, and between these two or three murders, i won't have to do any MORE murders to "pull my weight". i'll have already proven my worth, and potentially how hard i am to kill, to the group, so they won't immediately try to kill me next. and if that does happen down the line, the food i've already "gathered" will be enough to buy me time to plan.

so yeah. i think about fucked up survival scenarios a normal amount probably

I recently ran a poll asking everyone what they would eat on Snaktooth Island if Bugsnax weren't an option. The second most chosen option aside from the obvious (Sauce) was Cannibalism. So that begs the question.

This question has layers to it. Because not only do you have to successfully kill them (we're talking physical toll here, not emotional. Gramble would be easier to kill than Wambus, for example) but you also have to consider how much food they would actually get you.

Who are you eating. There is no show results. Answer for yourselves.

(Please describe how you would go about killing them in the tags. I need to know)

#what the fuck do i even tag this as for warnings???

94 notes · View notes

caramel-poptick · 2 years

Photo