Tumgik
bemadblog · 7 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Oh my god this is so fucking tight!
56K notes · View notes
bemadblog · 7 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 7 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 7 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Arkansas Matters Most Wanted, 11/4/16
Racialized media coverage at its best
0 notes
bemadblog · 7 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Photo
Tumblr media
No proof that shooting predators saves livestock
On 5 August, biologists from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ascended in a helicopter to shoot two members of the Profanity Peak wolf pack, which had been preying on cattle in the state’s northeast corner. After the cull failed to end predation, the state removed four more members of the 11-wolf pack. Some conservationists were outraged, but the logic behind such lethal control seems airtight: Remove livestock-killing wolves, coyotes, bears, and other predators, and you’ll protect farmers and ranchers from future losses.
A new study, however, claims that much of the research underpinning that common sense notion is flawed—and that the science of predator control needs a methodological overhaul. Adrian Treves, a conservation biologist at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and his colleagues examined more than 100 peer-reviewed studies, searching for ones that randomized some by removing or deterring predators while leaving others untouched. Not a single experiment in which predators were killed has ever successfully applied this randomized controlled design, they reported 1 September in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. “Lethal control methods need to be subjected to the same gold standard of science as anything else,” Treves says. He argues that policymakers should suspend predator management programs that aren’t backed by rigorous evidence.
467 notes · View notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Photo
Tumblr media
Byzle Morgan’s head, neck and face are marked by racist tattoos. He also has a teardrop tattoo under his eye, which typically signifies that the person has killed someone, and a swastika in a clover under his other eye. But jurors saw none of that when he appeared in court this week because he had concealer covering them.
Each day a professional cosmetologist meets Morgan prior to the jury being brought into the courtroom and applies his makeup. It is then removed before he returns to the county jail.
Morgan is being charged with robbery after he allegedly stole a man’s motorcycle at gunpoint. He also faces the death penalty in a different case he is accused of killing a 75-year-old woman days before the robbery.
Too bad we can’t change the color of black defendants in order to protect them from the racial prejudices of the jury. #Hate it!
3K notes · View notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
2 notes · View notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
4 notes · View notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
0 notes
bemadblog · 8 years
Link
0 notes