AGNOSTOPHOBIA [the fear of the unknown]

Uhm, wat'cha thinking 'bout such artstyle? I'm practicing for my comic bc i wanna it be as freaky as possible.

I think, Two-face is a perfect variant to show agnostophobia since him flipping the coin is looks like a try to belive what he is controling the situation and nothing unpredictable will happend. Или я обычный СПГС-ник.

I decided to share a beautiful view of the river.

Well, as I understand it, you have run out of arguments and you can only insult me. That's why I think the argument is over.

Thank you very much.

About AI art.

(This is my old post, but I decided to redo it because it was somewhere downstairs)

When I see all these angry posts that Tumblr is using intelligence gathering for AI, I don't understand the whole thing. There was even a person who wanted to leave this social network forever because of this, so I decided to express my point of view.

In this paragraph, I'll tell you why AI isn't as scary as you think it is. I often see the thesis that using work to train AI is stealing, but it's like calling learning to play the piano with someone else's work stealing, it doesn't make sense. As for the fact that AI oppresses artists and leaves them unemployed, this is an interesting situation. This has already happened during the Industrial Revolution in some year. The most striking example is the cigarette roller. While a person made 3-4 cigarettes a minute, the machine made 1000 and, of course, the machines replaced people. Not to mention the relatively recent replacement of factory workers with robots. This has always been the case, but you do not refuse to buy goods made by robots, but on the contrary, you rejoice at lower prices.

But the case here is even better than in those cases, because in order to use AI competently, you need to be smart enough in the topic of art. I am arguing that AI will not replace humans, but will simply become a convenient tool in the hands of artists. Now AI is not perfect at all, because you need to select the right prompts, and then find and correct errorsthat may not be visible to ordinary people (by the way, this is the reason why AI is popular with ordinary people, they just don't see a mistake) . It will be a long time before AI will be able to match the quality of the work of real artists, so there is no need to boycott the AI, this is a common process in the world when new technologies appear.

I would like to hear your opinion on this topic 🐢

About AI art.

(This is my old post, but I decided to redo it because it was somewhere downstairs)

When I see all these angry posts that Tumblr is using intelligence gathering for AI, I don't understand the whole thing. There was even a person who wanted to leave this social network forever because of this, so I decided to express my point of view.

In this paragraph, I'll tell you why AI isn't as scary as you think it is. I often see the thesis that using work to train AI is stealing, but it's like calling learning to play the piano with someone else's work stealing, it doesn't make sense. As for the fact that AI oppresses artists and leaves them unemployed, this is an interesting situation. This has already happened during the Industrial Revolution in some year. The most striking example is the cigarette roller. While a person made 3-4 cigarettes a minute, the machine made 1000 and, of course, the machines replaced people. Not to mention the relatively recent replacement of factory workers with robots. This has always been the case, but you do not refuse to buy goods made by robots, but on the contrary, you rejoice at lower prices.

But the case here is even better than in those cases, because in order to use AI competently, you need to be smart enough in the topic of art. I am arguing that AI will not replace humans, but will simply become a convenient tool in the hands of artists. Now AI is not perfect at all, because you need to select the right prompts, and then find and correct errorsthat may not be visible to ordinary people (by the way, this is the reason why AI is popular with ordinary people, they just don't see a mistake) . It will be a long time before AI will be able to match the quality of the work of real artists, so there is no need to boycott the AI, this is a common process in the world when new technologies appear.

I would like to hear your opinion on this topic 🐢

It's like I have time for that. I need to go to college now, not learn to draw.

And what's wrong with more people being able to express themselves in artistic activities? If you're afraid of losing your uniqueness because of this, then you're just an egoist who doesn't want technology to develop, because it will make your talent not unique.

As I said, this is just a repetition of processes that took place before, it's just that now you can express your indignation on social networks, where people will definitely see it and start telling that AI should not be allowed to develop.

About AI art.

(This is my old post, but I decided to redo it because it was somewhere downstairs)

When I see all these angry posts that Tumblr is using intelligence gathering for AI, I don't understand the whole thing. There was even a person who wanted to leave this social network forever because of this, so I decided to express my point of view.

In this paragraph, I'll tell you why AI isn't as scary as you think it is. I often see the thesis that using work to train AI is stealing, but it's like calling learning to play the piano with someone else's work stealing, it doesn't make sense. As for the fact that AI oppresses artists and leaves them unemployed, this is an interesting situation. This has already happened during the Industrial Revolution in some year. The most striking example is the cigarette roller. While a person made 3-4 cigarettes a minute, the machine made 1000 and, of course, the machines replaced people. Not to mention the relatively recent replacement of factory workers with robots. This has always been the case, but you do not refuse to buy goods made by robots, but on the contrary, you rejoice at lower prices.

But the case here is even better than in those cases, because in order to use AI competently, you need to be smart enough in the topic of art. I am arguing that AI will not replace humans, but will simply become a convenient tool in the hands of artists. Now AI is not perfect at all, because you need to select the right prompts, and then find and correct errorsthat may not be visible to ordinary people (by the way, this is the reason why AI is popular with ordinary people, they just don't see a mistake) . It will be a long time before AI will be able to match the quality of the work of real artists, so there is no need to boycott the AI, this is a common process in the world when new technologies appear.

I would like to hear your opinion on this topic 🐢

Well, I suddenly got in the mood to write something.

I hate hair on any part of my body except my head. On the head, the hair performs a fairly important function, namely, it does not allow dirt to get into the eyes. And they also look beautiful.

But in other parts of the body, hair is a vestige that has been left to us since ancient times, where it helped us not to freeze. But today, hair is useless and only harms our body. Not only are they not comfortable, but they also accumulate bacteria that harm the health of the skin. I don't understand those people who grow hair everywhere except the head, why do you do it? And they're not pretty.

Well, as I wrote, this is a natural process that takes place in our world, when something is simplified and becomes more accessible to others.

As an example, I want to cite such an ordinary thing as a camera, which we all use regularly. Previously, only masters of their craft could draw nature, but now we do it with one button of the phone. But you don't want to give up on cameras because it's become a regular part of life. It will be the same with AI art.

And yes, I'm a sucky artist, I admit it, but I also want to create, but I can't, no matter how hard I try.

Thanks for promoting my post.

About AI art.

(This is my old post, but I decided to redo it because it was somewhere downstairs)

When I see all these angry posts that Tumblr is using intelligence gathering for AI, I don't understand the whole thing. There was even a person who wanted to leave this social network forever because of this, so I decided to express my point of view.

In this paragraph, I'll tell you why AI isn't as scary as you think it is. I often see the thesis that using work to train AI is stealing, but it's like calling learning to play the piano with someone else's work stealing, it doesn't make sense. As for the fact that AI oppresses artists and leaves them unemployed, this is an interesting situation. This has already happened during the Industrial Revolution in some year. The most striking example is the cigarette roller. While a person made 3-4 cigarettes a minute, the machine made 1000 and, of course, the machines replaced people. Not to mention the relatively recent replacement of factory workers with robots. This has always been the case, but you do not refuse to buy goods made by robots, but on the contrary, you rejoice at lower prices.

But the case here is even better than in those cases, because in order to use AI competently, you need to be smart enough in the topic of art. I am arguing that AI will not replace humans, but will simply become a convenient tool in the hands of artists. Now AI is not perfect at all, because you need to select the right prompts, and then find and correct errorsthat may not be visible to ordinary people (by the way, this is the reason why AI is popular with ordinary people, they just don't see a mistake) . It will be a long time before AI will be able to match the quality of the work of real artists, so there is no need to boycott the AI, this is a common process in the world when new technologies appear.

I would like to hear your opinion on this topic 🐢

Refuse post-modern, join decadence. It's not an offering. It's an order.

I'm again thinking 'bout Vanessa's mental state. I don't think this person is fine.

The posts will begin on Tuesday. Have a nice day, everyone.

There will be posts, don't worry. It's just that now the mood is not for big discussions.

For now, you can tell, how you are doing.

Trying to make pizza number 2.

About veganism

Veganism is quite a popular topic today and I have something to say about it.

I'm okay with vegans themselves. Well, they don't eat meat and they don't eat it, it's better for me.

But there's a problem. They think that by eating fruit, they save animals and do no harm to anyone, which is fundamentally wrong.

Let's start with the fact that there are not so many places in the world to grow, say, bananas and people have to cut down forests in order to build their banana fields, and we all know very well that deforestation has a terrible effect on the ecology of the earth. But the problems do not end there, because any animal that enters the territory of cultivation automatically becomes an enemy and belongs to destruction, and these are insects, birds, monkeys, and so on. So if all people switched to plant-based foods, the earth would not automatically be the same as it was 3,000 years ago.

Also, I want to note that plants should always be watered with water and sprayed with chemicals. Many would say that the livestock industry consumes more water, but there is such a thing as the water cycle in nature. For example, according to statistics, the water you drink has been drunk by about 10 living creatures before you. So the water does not go away in vain, but returns to nature. There is also a problem with chemicals, because in about 100 years the soil that is pladorous today can become poisoned and unsuitable for planting. This can lead to the extinction of entire hectares of fields and forests.

With this text, I didn't want to offend anyone, I just wanted to say that veganism doesn't really help to preserve nature on earth and is definitely not better than meat-eating.

Expect posts sometime on Saturday. Sorry for so rarely posting a big post.

Once again, I remind you that you can suggest topics of interest to you for discussion. Otherwise, you may not be interested in the topics I am talking about.

Probably, there are the largest number of rumors and myths about nuclear energy, so I decided to analyze this topic.

I believe that the Chernobl and Fukushima accidents, as well as the nuclear weapons situation from the 1950s to the 1990s, gave nuclear power a bad name. But now, nuclear energy is one of the most efficient and safest in the world.

First, we need to understand how nuclear editors work. Due to the decay of uranium, a large amount of heat is created, which heats the water, and the steam spins the blades, generating electricity. Further, the steam turns into an aqueous state, is purified and clean water enters the tank. Many people may think that a nuclear power plant consumes water, but no, the water after treatment becomes very clean, so it harms aquatic inhabitants. Therefore, nuclear power plants do not harm the environment, unlike coal.

You can say that the stations are exploding and it's extremely dangerous. But now the chance of an explosion of the nuclear power plant is minimal, because people have been studying each accident closely, drawing conclusions and improving the construction technique. Here the situation can be compared to airplanes, because airplanes used to be an extremely unreliable way of transportation, but people, improving their technique of aircraft construction, have achieved that now the airplane is the safest transportYou can say that the stations are exploding and it's extremely dangerous. But now the chance of an explosion of the nuclear power plant is minimal, because people have been studying each accident closely, drawing conclusions and improving the construction technique. Here the situation can be compared to airplanes, because airplanes used to be an extremely unreliable way of transportation, but people, improving their aircraft construction techniques, have achieved that now the airplane is the safest transport.

Based on this, I conclude that nuclear energy is now one of the safest, cheapest and most environmentally friendly in the world, and there is definitely no need to be afraid of it.

As always, you can express your point of view in the comments.

Poll Number 1

You can explain in the comments why you chose a particular answer.

I didn't schedule any posts today, so check out the pizza I made. The only thing is that they helped me with the dough .

Sorry for the low quality of the photo.