Follow me for more info

Brief on Corona Virus and how the governments especially in USA dealing with pandemic Part three

The New York Times outlined a numerical worst-case-scenario for the pandemic in the US: If things go badly, 160 million to 214 million people could be infected with COVID-19 over a brief pandemic period. This leaves the door open for 200,000 to 1.7 million deaths, and between 2.4 million and 21 million hospitalizations.

This – in addition to the social distancing measures required to prevent further devastation– will likely cause economic devastation that’s hard to predict. There’s likely to be further job losses, as well as continued market instability that could affect everything from employment rates to currency values. Ironically, stretching the pandemic over a protracted period of time – such as eighteen  months – could actually bode well for society overall.

You may have heard the phrase “flattening the curve” recently, but not had it fully explained. Essentially, it’s extremely likely that large portions of the US will be infected with COVID-19, regardless of what happens. In order to ensure best results, social distancing spreads the infections over time, allowing the healthcare system to support a smaller number of cases over a longer period of time.

If the cases spike massively in a short period of time, while the pandemic will technically be over earlier, it will overwhelm the healthcare system and cause a much larger death toll. In other words, the longer the disease lasts, the better off everyone involved will be. In the meantime, scientists are developing fifteen different potential vaccines across the globe, using diverse technologies that include mRNA, DNA, nano particle, synthetic,and modified virus-like particles to hasten the process.

Phase 1 clinical trials are beginning in multiple countries for various potential COVID-19 vaccines and treatments, though as stated before, many of these could take as long as eighteen months to potentially be offered to the public – especially when factoring in testing and distribution time.

While the vaccine will ultimately be a huge part of ending the pandemic, it’s an end so far off that it’s not worth banking on for the time being. The fact is, the world is currently united in one cause: Fighting the COVID-19 virus, and preventing it from claiming and ruining lives as much as we can.

Everyone on Earth has a responsibility to reduce the spread of the disease by maintaining social distance, keeping good hygiene, and staying informed through reliable sources like the World Health Organization and the Center for Disease Control.

While frightening scenarios like an eighteen-month pandemic are becoming increasingly likely over time, all we can do is be responsible and compassionate, and work together in fighting the viral threat that unites us.

Brief on Corona Virus and how the governments  especially USA are dealing with this global Pandemic  Part Two

By January 20th, 2020, COVID-19 had already been exported across the globe. Cases were reported in Thailand and the US, and by January 23rd, the Chinese government put the entire city of Wuhan under strict quarantine. By the end of the month, the World Health Organization had declared a public health emergency, and President Trump had issued a ban on travelling to the US for those who’d been in Wuhan up to two weeks prior to travelling. The first ten days of February saw infections spike both inside and outside China, as well as the first deaths in the Philippines and the death of a United States citizen in Wuhan. By the ninth of February, the death toll in China had surpassed that of the 2002-2003 SARS epidemic with 811 fatalities. February also gave us the virus’ name, COVID-19, as well as huge outbreaks in the US, South Korea, Iran, and Italy. The end of February also brought the first deaths on US soil, as the devastation continued into March. Early March saw cases pop up on every continent across the globe, as well as a declaration of global pandemic from the World Health Organization. In the wake of increasing case numbers and skyrocketing COVID-19 deaths, countries have ramped up their quarantine and safety measures across the planet.

On March 17th, a leaked government plan revealed the possibility that the pandemic could potentially last as long as eighteen months, and come in multiple waves rather than being a single, linear progression. This brings us to the present. It’s clear that the progression has been extremely rapid, with an almost unprecedented global spread. Some government measures may slow the global rate of transmission slightly, but where can we expect to go from here? We’ve seen a huge rush of school closures and event cancellations across the globe, as well as the closing of non-essential meeting places like bars, theatres, and dine-in restaurants. These trends are likely to continue for the foreseeable future, and affect almost every aspect of our lives, from food to entertainment to healthcare. Entertainment is moving increasingly towards streaming and video-on-demand, with major releases like Wonder Woman: 1984 skipping its theatrical run entirely and moving directly

towards VOD-releasing. If we’re looking at a protracted pandemic, we’ll likely see more more and more releases forego their theatrical runs and go straight to video on demand. However, this actually has wider implications for your entertainment as a whole. Production sets for movies and television involve a lot of people working in close proximity – making them huge transmission risks.  As a result, it’s unlikely new movies and TV shows would be made, so you better get used to enjoying re-runs of all your favorite shows.

Thankfully, many internet content creators – like this show – are less likely to be affected due to having smaller teams. So, there will be plenty more new videos to get you through the boredom of quarantine. The National Debt is something that’s also likely to rise. The US Federal Reserve has already spent trillions of dollars in market fluctuation relief and the US government has also recently spent $100 billion as part of a COVID-19 relief package.

These numbers are likely to continue rising over the eighteen-month period, if the pandemic does indeed last that long. Many areas in the US have adopted temporary policies forbidding eviction for the lack of rent due to the unprecedented levels of sudden unemployment. Other proposed legislation will likely increase pay for sick leave, and also move towards financial relief for small businesses suffering due to shut-downs.

School closures over the next eighteen months will also cause massive disruption to education systems across the globe. High school exams being cancelled will lead to huge reductions in college admissions, essentially stalling the college system for over a year while new systems and technology are developed to work around the COVID-19 pandemic. If classes do resume, they’ll likely be online, using services such as Zoom that have grown extremely popular as of late. Many commentators have observed that social distancing will likely fundamentally change our way of life for years to come, even after the 18-month pandemic concludes.

In the short term, writer Gideon Lichfield posits that the following businesses are likely to be the most damaged by protracted, mandatory social distancing: restaurants, cafes, bars, nightclubs, gyms, hotels, theaters, cinemas, art galleries, shopping malls, craft fairs, museums, musicians and other performers, sporting venues and sports teams, conference venues and conference producers, cruise lines, airlines, public transportation, private schools, and day-care centers.

Huge stresses to these businesses will likely shift the economy on a fundamental level, leading to what some economists have dubbed the “shut-in economy.”  The 18-month pandemic also throws the prospect of future federal and state elections into question, considering the amount of public gathering at polling stations that’s usually required during voting. The economic and political nature of the entire planet is likely to shift over the coming months – with consolation prizes being the sudden reduction of carbon emissions from working at home and the complete nosedive of international travel during the current crisis. Many predict that the only conceivable way to manage future pandemics in the wake of COVID-19’s devastation will be to develop better healthcare systems, and sophisticated technology to predict, detect, and treat those at risk before outbreaks even have an opportunity to become epidemics and pandemics.

Still, in the short term, many have predicted issues with supply shortages – already precipitated with rampant panic buying at many retail environments across the globe, as well as dangerous medical supply shortages that could leave some of the most vulnerable in real danger.

Many predict that, using the precedent of prior pandemics, the stress of worldwide lock down and supply shortages could result in widespread riots and civil unrest. This could not only succeed in spreading the virus further, but will also expend valuable government resources better spent treating cases of the virus itself. Also, it goes without saying that people’s lives would also be negatively affected by the violence itself.

Brief on Corona Virus and how the governments  especially USA are dealing with this global Pandemic  Part One

INTRODUCTION

This is just few facts on Corona Virus and this is the just the first part of it.

The Brief

As of this video’s writing, March 22nd, 2020, we’re almost four months into a brave new COVID-19 world. Since the initial public reports of the Novel Corona virus on December 31st of 2019, we’ve had over 300,000 confirmed cases, nearly 200,000 of which are still active. While recoveries are still vastly outnumbering deaths – 95,000 to 13,000 at the time of this counting – the disease has already caused massive changes to how we as individuals and as a society have lived our lives.

Scientists and epidemiologists have estimated that it could take as long as eighteen months, or potentially even more, to research, develop, and distribute a workable vaccine.  Many optimists believe that, if governmental rollout of treatment is effective and containment procedures are followed, we may see cases begin to abate during the Summer months in much the same way we do during flu season. However, while it’s nice to hope for the best, it can often be more useful to plan for the worst-case scenario. What if the pandemic does continue as it does now for those whole eighteen months, or even beyond?

While this is a fast-developing situation and the facts of the case tend to evolve day by day, we can turn to experts and look at their current predictions for what an eighteen-month-or-beyond pandemic might look like. Also, keep in mind: The best way to avoid the adverse effects of the Corona virus on a personal level is to avoid catching it in the first place.In order to do this, maintain social distancing, stay indoors, wash your hands frequently, and don’t touch your face.

Before we take a look at where we might be heading with the COVID-19 pandemic, we first need to take a look at where we’ve been, and chart the course of the virus’ growth and spread over time.As we previously mentioned, the first whispering of the virus happened publicly in late December of 2019.

Chinese health officials traced 41 cases of mysterious pneumonia back to the Wuhan Seafood Wholesale Market, where the virus is believed to have infected its first human hosts. Corona viruses are Zoonotic diseases, meaning they originate in the animal kingdom before passing to human hosts. After drawing the connection on January 1st, the Chinese government put the kibosh or seal  on the exotic meat market, but by then it was already too late to contain the disease. Chinese scientists first identified COVID-19 a week later, and by the 11th of January, China reported their first COVID-19 death.

World war 3 will it happen? Part 4

With few friends on the international stage thanks to its sponsorship of terrorism, Pakistan is also unable to call upon powerful friends to help it in case of war- although China might perhaps be interested in responding to Pakistan's call for aid. Given China's antagonistic relationship with India, and the fact that India sits right on China's jugular in terms of trade routes that pass through the Indian ocean, China has a lot to gain from a military defeat and weakening of India. A Chinese intervention however would almost certainly draw an American one, coming to the defense of a strong international partner and fellow democracy.

This would spiral the conflict from a regional one, to a full-blown major theater war. While the end result would still almost certainly be a combined Indian-American victory, India's military would be hard pressed to pursue offensive objectives in Pakistan and hold off Chinese forces long enough for America to respond. Luckily, there is little favorable terrain for a major ground offensive from China into India, or vice-versa, so India would have plenty of time to hold off Chinese assaults until American forces put pressure on China from the Pacific.

In a stand-up one-on-one war though, there's no doubt that India would win any conflict with Pakistan.

World war 3 will it happen? Part  Three

Here again, India outnumbers Pakistan nearly two to one, with 4,292 tanks versus Pakistan's 2,200. Both nation's tanks vary in modernity, but both nation's tanks are mostly very capable platforms. India's main tank is the Soviet-built T-72, with modern upgrades. Until Desert Storm, analysts feared that the T-72 would be a formidable threat to the American Abrams and the British Challenger. The short but intense war however showed that T-72s were all but utterly obsolete versus Abrams or Challengers, scoring not a single kill in the entire conflict while America and British tanks decimated hundreds in return.

Luckily, India won't be facing off against an Abrams of Challenger in a war with Pakistan,as Pakistan's main battle tank is the Chinese made Type-59. Basically a copy of a Soviet design, the Type-59 could not hope to cope with modern tanks,performing even worse than a T-72 against modern American or British armor, but it could still pose a threat to India's T-72s. On the whole though, India's tank forces would outperform Pakistan's own, and the ground war would almost certainly go to India in a pitched battle. India's own artillery forces also greatly outnumber Pakistan's, with over 4,000 artillery versus Pakistan's 1,226. This includes 266 Multiple Launch Rocket Systems versus Pakistan's 100, giving India far greater fire support capabilities than Pakistan. However, because Pakistan has the defensive advantage, its smaller numbers would initially not matter much in the first few weeks of the conflict.

Once India was fully mobilized however, the overwhelming pressure of so much combat equipment would inevitably break Pakistan's back- unless the nation could score decisive victories with bold counter-attacks and push into India itself. India's navy is also far more powerful than Pakistan's navy, with 285 vessels versus Pakistan's 100.

This includes one Indian aircraft carrier, with Pakistan fielding zero. The ability to project air power out at sea would make it suicidal for Pakistan to seek a naval confrontation with India, and Pakistan's own ships would likely fight a defensive war close to shore and not venture into the Indian ocean at all. With zero destroyers versus India's 10, and 8 submarines versus India's 16, Pakistan doesn't have a hope of winning a naval war. So how would a war play out between the two nations?

Who would win?

India's inability to respond properly to the 2008 Mumbai terror attacks led to it completely rethinking its war strategy against Pakistan.The terror attacks were quickly traced back to the Pakistan intelligence services, who had trained and equipped the terrorists, but the Indian military was unable to respond quickly enough to punish Pakistan for the attack without taking massive casualties. That's because by the time the link was discovered, Pakistani forces had already moved into defensive positions along the border with India. To prevent this from happening again, India focused on a war fighting concept it is calling Cold Start.

The aim of Cold Start is to rapidly mobilize border forces to push into Pakistan and deny advantageous defensive positions to the Pakistani military, in effect opening up a corridor for follow-on Indian forces to pour through. The most important aspect of Cold Start though is to move rapidly enough and deep enough to Pakistan's territory that it will deter the nation from using its tactical nuclear weapons arsenal against the Indian military.

Currently India operates under a strict no-first-strike policy, and will only use nuclear weapons in retaliation. Pakistan however understands that it is the inferior power to India, and thus maintains a defensive first-strike policy, meaning that it will use nuclear weapons in a defensive matter in order to fend off the superior Indian military. India's goal therefore is to push deep enough into Pakistan that it will deter the nation from using nuclear weapons on its own soil. This also means taking a limited number of objectives rather than going for a decapitation strike and eliminating the Pakistani leadership. Given the technological and numerological superiority of the Indian military, it is more than capable of carrying this strategy out- at least on paper. While India has plenty of experience fighting against Pakistan, it has never executed such a massive offensive and it is unknown if it has the experience, expertise, and equipment to pull off such a massive logistics-dependent operation. If Cold Start were to fail, it would be a strategic disaster for the Indian military, as it would leave Indian forces bunched up on the border and at the mercy of Pakistani nuclear strikes. Of course that would inevitably invite a nuclear response from India, further escalating the conflict. If Cold Start succeeds though, Pakistan would be all but neutralized, and forced to come to the peace table under India's terms. Removing nuclear weapons from the equation only makes an Indian victory even more certain, and it's sure that without Pakistan resorting to large-scale use of nuclear weapons, it cannot hope to stand against India's military.

World war 3 will it happen? Part two

Now the nation relies on its arsenal of nuclear weapons to fend off Indian forces, and continues to finance and aid terrorists to strike against Indian targets across the border. For its part, India's patience is running incredibly thin, and one more attack such as that in Mumbai in 2008, which was coordinated by Pakistani intelligence, will almost certainly lead to a swift and overwhelming Indian response. In case of war, Indian forces are over twice as large as Pakistan's, with a military made up of 1.444 million personnel vs 654,000. India's reservist pool is also much larger, with 2.1 million reservists able to be called up quickly into active service vs Pakistan's 550,000. However, India's much larger size vs Pakistan's means that Indian reservists will take longer to call up, equip, and mobilize to the front lines vs Pakistan, so Pakistani reservists will almost certainly beat India's own to the front lines. This will put incredible pressure on India's active-duty forces at the onset of war. India's defense budget is about six times larger than Pakistan's, with 61 billion versus 11 billion. This allows India to operate far more mechanized forces than Pakistan, which only operates about 2 mechanized infantry divisons.

The difference is also in equipment though, with India fielding overwhelmingly more modern equipment than Pakistan. India's air force is also much larger than the Pakistani air force, with 2,123 aircraft versus Pakistan's 1,372. India's fighter fleet numbers at 538 aircraft vs Pakistan's 356, although in any conflict Pakistan will almost certainly be fighting defensively. This would allow Pakistan's air artillery to help neutralize some of that numerical disadvantage, and in a defensive war India's larger number superiority will actually put it roughly on par with Pakistan's fighter fleets once losses and denial from air artillery is accounted for.  Where India truly holds the advantage though is in its fleet of 260 Sukhoi Su-30s, an extremely capable Russian fighter who's only real competition on the Pakistani side is the American-made F-16. While a modern F-16 is more than a match for a Su-30, not many of Pakistan's F-16s are fully modernized. To make matters worse, Pakistan only fields 76 of them. Most of the Pakistani air force is made of Chinese or joint Chinese-Pakistani fighters, and Chinese fighter designs are generally accepted as being inferior to either Russian or American designs.

In the air, India will definitely hold the advantage.India fields a transport fleet that's 5 times greater than Pakistan's own fleet, with 250 various transport aircraft versus Pakistan's 49. Backed up with a helicopter fleet that's twice the size of Pakistan's, with 722 helicopters versus 346, India has a crucial advantage in air mobility that Pakistan can't match. This will make the movement of heavy equipment and infantry through the mountainous north-west border of India possible, and while easily defended, will favor an Indian offensive in the region. Air transport though will matter little to Pakistan, as it will be fighting a defensive war hoping to bleed Indian forces, trading territory for casualties until the Pakistani army can counter-attack. Still, the lack of mobility will mean Pakistani forces in the mountainous north will suffer greatly and likely be inevitably defeated. One area that Pakistan outshines India in is attack helicopters, with Pakistan operating 56 American Vietnam-era cobras versus a fleet of 23 Indian attack helicopters. Pakistan would likely choose to use these in the mountainous north, as they will make supporting its forces in the difficult terrain much easier. If India does not properly equip its mountain infantry with man portable air artillery, it could face serious casualties as Pakistani attack holes provide close air support. India's own fleet is so small it will have limited to no utility, being easy fodder for Pakistan's own air artillery.

Both nations however have so few attack helicopters that their air fleets will become depleted due to casualties and equipment breakdowns within the first week or two of serious fighting. The bulk of the fighting between the two nations will happen on land, and this means that the most important element of either nation's military will be its main battle tank fleet.

Hi all lets wait for the next part

World War 3 would it happen?

It's the conflict that many have called a possible prelude to World War III, and one that has already played out multiple times over the last 70 years. India versus Pakistan, a clash of powers that if both sides committed fully to, would be the largest armed conflict since World War II. But which side really has the upper hand, and what would a conflict end up looking like between these two intense rivals? India and Pakistan's relationship is a rocky one to say the least, with both sides feuding against the other ever since Britain pulled out of the region after World War II and created the two separate states. All matter of border and culture conflicts resulted in a neighborhood commonly called the most dangerous in the world- a potential conflict zone more likely to result in all-out war than even the borders between NATO and Russia, or even China and Taiwan.Historically, Pakistan has suffered repeated defeats in its wars against India, though it has also achieved key strategic smaller scale victories amongst the no-mans land that borders the two nations. In the early 2000s, a new security partnership with the United States made many Indians nervous, as it was believed such a partnership might lead to an influx of American military equipment and training, greatly improving the capabilities of the Pakistani military. Soon though American intelligence officials realized that Pakistan was double-dealing them, aiding Taliban forces in Afghanistan and even sheltering them from American strikes. Pakistan never had any interest in the Taliban being ousted from Afghanistan, despite taking hundreds of millions of dollars from the US for its cooperation. For Pakistan, the Taliban was a vital strategic buffer between itself and Iran- whom hated the Taliban.

It quickly became clear that the US and Pakistan would not become close partners after all,and instead a growing relationship between the US and India, the world's most powerful democracy and the world's largest democracy, put Pakistan on the backfoot.

Lets wait for the next part right behind this one thank you

https://theworldtruth.tumblr.com/post/614739258920583168/the-world-of-faith-and-religion-of-the-20th this the link to my new writing https://www.instagram.com/p/B-9xlajp9Zt/?igshid=191u68r0j66w3

What Happens if the USA and India are allies against Russia and China?

INDIA

First up is India, the world's fourth most powerful military. With an active-duty force of 1.4 million and a reservist force of 2.8 million, India can all upon a deep pool of manpower to prosecute any war. India also possesses a formidable air force, with 590 fighter aircraft, 804 attack aircraft, and a huge fleet of surveillance and transport helicopters that number at 720. India, however, suffers from a lack of attack helicopters, with only 15 in its inventory; this may prove to be a crippling deficiency in any attempt to combat a Chinese/Russian incursion over its mountainous northern and eastern borders. India does, however, maintain a force of 4,400 combat tanks, of which about half are modern or semi-modern T-90s, and the indigenous Arjun main battle tank. India is also equipped with a staggering number of towed artillery, 4,100 pieces meant to make it impossible for their Chinese rivals to penetrate Indian defences across the mountain gaps of its north-eastern border. Its naval forces include one aircraft carrier, 14 frigates, 11 destroyers, 22 corvettes, and 16 submarines, a sizable collection of naval hardware that its immediate threat-China- would be hard-pressed to defeat. 

China

Next up is China. China is the most populous nation on earth and maintains an active-duty force of 2.2 million, with a reservist force of 510,000. With an air force totalling 1,125 Fighter aircraft, 1,527 attack aircraft, and 281 attack helicopters, China has a serious advantage in the air over India; yet China's pilots are undertrained compared to their Western counterparts, and forced to fly under strict supervision from ground controllers, a huge liability in fast-paced modern air combat. China also has a force of 7,700 tanks, and 6,246 towed artillery backed up by 2,000 self-propelled artillery, mostly ballistic missile launchers which would pose a significant threat to Indian and American forces. On the sea, China maintains a significant force, with 1 test aircraft carrier not rated for combat operations, 50 light frigates, 29 destroyers, 39 corvettes, and 73 submarines. While larger in number than Indian naval forces, China cannot maintain long-term logistical support for any deployed ships, meaning only a small number of them could operate far from China's shores for longer than a few weeks. Underpinning China's military might is also the fact that its military is severely affected by systemic corruption, so much so that China's leadership doubts the ability of the Chinese military to fight and win a major war against a near-peer power such as India.

Russia

Russia has the world's second most powerful military, with an active-duty force of just over 1 million personnel and a reserve force of 2.5 million. With 818 fighter aircraft and 1,416 attack aircraft, Russia's air forces are formidable, but would be severely hampered in war by a lack of reconnaissance assets; as one Russian military analyst put it: “We have long-range, sometimes precision-guided weapons, but we don't always know where the target is.”. On the ground though, Russia maintains the world's largest tank fleet, numbering over 20,000, however, this figure should be taken with a grain of salt as the number includes many thousands of Soviet-era tanks that have long been decommissioned and would need weeks to bring into service, and even once operational, would be decades behind in capability, firepower, and protection versus modern tanks. Russia's naval fleet has severely atrophied since the collapse of the Soviet Union, but it still maintains one aircraft carrier, 9 frigates, 13 destroyers, 78 corvettes, and 62 submarines. Though Russian vessels are on the whole ageing and plagued by maintenance issues, they are still armed with very modern and capable long-range missiles, making them a force to be feared.

USA

And finally, the world's chief military power- the United States of America. The US enters the conflict on India's side, with an active-duty force of 1.3 million personnel and 800,000 reserve personnel. With 1,962 fighter aircraft and 2,830 multi-role aircraft, the US has almost double the air-power of Russia or China; its naval aviation forces alone are on par with either nation. Its fleet of 973 attack helicopters ensures that ground offensives are well covered, and it is rare that an American infantryman finds himself without fire support. A proponent of blitzkrieg warfare, America also maintains a fleet of 5,900 tanks- almost all of them modern Abrams variants- and 39,000 armoured fighting vehicles, giving its ground forces unparalleled mobility. While lagging in numbers, America's 950 self-propelled, 795 towed, and 1,200 rocket artillery platforms often feature smart, precision-guided munitions. 

SUMMARY

In fact, of all the militaries in the world, the United States uses the most precision-guided munitions, featuring them on almost every combat platform, and giving US forces incredible legality. At the onset of war, Chinese and Indian border forces stationed across the length of the Himalayas would come into immediate conflict. While initial predisposition of forces favours the Indian army, the narrow roads and valleys of the mighty Himalayas would make anything but meagre gains all but impossible. Artillery would devastate any sizable forces trying to move through mountain gaps, leaving most of the combat action to light infantry units supported by helicopters. With Chinese forces primarily stationed along its eastern coast, India would initially have the upper hand both in the air and on the ground. Only a few airbases on the Tibetan plateau could support combat operations for the Chinese, while dozens of airfields on India's side could all put Indian planes within combat range of the front lines. It would take weeks for China to construct makeshift airfields and air bases, and then re-base the bulk of its air fleet to the Tibetan plateau, during which time, despite more advanced Chinese aircraft, Indian forces would enjoy a degree of air superiority. Yet the mountainous terrain would make it difficult for India to exploit that air superiority, and it would be forced to try to use ground attack planes when it would be far more efficient to use attack helicopters, of which India, again, only has 15. Once China relocated its mobile ballistic missile launchers to its western military regions however, India would face a withering barrage of ballistic missiles that it could do absolutely nothing to protect itself from.Airfields and military command and control nodes across northern and eastern India would be devastated, and India's air force would suddenly find it very difficult to maintain hard-won air superiority, giving China the time needed to re-base its air forces.Yet this is where China would have to make a very difficult choice: if it moves its forces to counter the Indian threat, it will leave the Pacific front completely vulnerable to American attack. Caught between the literal rock of the Himalayas swarming with Indian infantry, and the hard choice of leaving itself vulnerable to coastal raids by the American navy, China may look to its Russian allies for a solution. Russia would need to carefully consider the strategic situation.It's Chinese allies desperately depend on the Pacific ocean for trade, importing most of their oil via sea trade routes and with domestic reserves not yet ready to support the long-term war. With the majority of China's trade and oil passing through the Indian Ocean, the Indian navy is as one analyst put it: “poised on China's jugular”, and could easily cripple China with a naval blockade of Chinese shipping. America's Pacific forces are, on their own, also more than sufficient to cripple the Chinese economy with a trade blockade, and China's navy could not hope to counter America on its own. Desperately needing to ensure the oil lifeline stays open for its ally, Russia would likely try to bolster its Pacific fleet with large elements of its Northern fleet; yet, depending on the time of year, the arctic ice may not have melted enough to open up shipping lanes.Either way, whatever naval forces Russia could muster on the Pacific would be needed to aid the Chinese in fending off the American navy. This would still not be enough to save the Chinese economy however, as India's navy would never have to leave home to stop all Chinese shipping in the Indian Ocean.With a very limited capability to support its navy far from its shores, China could at best scrounge together a small battle group of destroyers and cruisers with perhaps a few nuclear submarines to try and break the Indian blockade; yet with India operating so close to home shores, it could take advantage of shore-based air power and make quick work of any Chinese task force.In the end, China could not hope to stand against naval blockades by both the US and India, even with reinforcements from the Russian navy.This is China's glaring Achille's heel: its almost complete reliance on the sea for trade and oil, and why China has been ambitiously undergoing its modern 'silk road' infrastructure development program with friendly nations... with very mixed success. Caught between the threat of raids on its Pacific coast by the US Navy, and Indian forces pushing through the Himalayas, China would likely choose not to deploy its ballistic missiles to the West, as even if India managed to break out of the Himalayas, China's western territory is large of little economic value. It would be far more prudent for China to try to keep America's carrier groups at bay with its DF-21 ballistic missiles, though China has still, to date, failed to show it can follow through on the threat of its ballistic missile forces by displaying a mastery of the various tracking, recon, and targeting systems and assets needed to go from launch to successful kill, or the ability to properly defend them from US attack. At best, the Russian alliance could hope to hold India at bay in the Himalayas, and could likely even push India back, once Chinese and Russian personnel created enough forward air bases on the Tibetan Plateau to support offensive operations.Yet Chinese and Russian forces would be limited to advancing only as far as the Indian foothills on the western edges of the Himalayas; the narrow passes and undeveloped roads through those passes would not make it possible to transport large amounts of hardware into India itself, while India could hold vast amounts of tanks and artillery on its plains ready to crush any advance into Indian territory. In short, it would be guaranteed suicide to try to break out of the Himalayas for both the Chinese and Russian forces. Meanwhile, India and the US could starve China into submission by devastating its economy through naval blockades.It would take weeks for the US to degrade Russia's and China's naval and air forces enough to attempt an amphibious assault against either nation, but the high casualties would make it a very unappealing proposition. Instead, the US could comfortably sit back and bottle the Russian fleet up while systematically destroying the Chinese fleet- leaving their Indian allies to continue denying China's desperately needed oil imports. A US/India and Russia/China war would end with very little territory gained or lost on either side and with staggering amounts of casualties for Indian and Chinese forces. The US navy would likely see significant casualties, but both Russia's and China's navies would be all but destroyed. China and India's economies would be devastated, but China's specifically could face a catastrophic collapse that could even lead to the end of its Communist Party's rule. With so much to lose and practically nothing to gain, neither side would ever seriously consider such a war, but if they did, China's inability to protect its sea trade routes would make one side the clear victor.

https://theworldtruth.tumblr.com/ https://www.instagram.com/p/B-4LepVH91V/?igshid=sjtnkbidc9ex

Story time “Rather Amusing” Part 1

Characters

Mr Richard (The old man)

Richard (The boy)

Mr Roy and Mrs Roy (The parents of Richard)

Ricky (Mr Richards dogs)

Ronald (Mr Richards dogs)

Roxy (Mr Richards dogs)

Once there lived an old miserable man in a village in the outskirts of the main high street. which was quite awkwardly connected to the high street with a slip road that you would find on the motorway in England. This miserable life was not actually true when you look in the perspective of the old man as he lived in an ordinary house for four. It would have been a rather entertaining place for the kids in the neighbouring houses to come and play around as he had a big garden and 2 dogs. The dog's names all started with the same letter Ricky, Ronald and finally the bravest and feminist of them all  Roxy.

By this time you could guess the neighbors should be annoyed with all the barking the morning that the dogs make.

Next part in the process of making hope you love this part in the next part we can see the rest thank you for the support you all presenting

Holly Bible

Holly book of the Hindus

The World of Faith and Religion of the 20th Century (Part One)

Disclaimer

When thinking about the situation of the World at this stage is an extreme distress for anyone who reads this blog but to assure you, I am not writing this blog to criticize anyone or any type of religion. It is just a study that I made and in with a bit of knowledge that the world has given me as resources to investigate for this topic.

Introduction

Hi, my name is Ryan David. I am a British citizen who has only been in this country for few years. To be exact 7 years in total. I was born in Bahrain in the middle east and you might be thinking am I an Arab or Muslim. No, I am a Christian and an Indian who had shifted to Bahrain from India. So, let us get to the subject. I left Bahrain after two months after I was born and came to this land of opportunities that is what my grandparents used to say. We arrived for the first time in the UK around 1999 and was here till for one year left for personal stuff back to India came back 2003 and remained there for around two to three years I suppose. Then we left for India for 7 years. I think that was a brilliant idea. Not only for a child’s mindset in a common aspect of teaching me the traditions, culture and language of our motherland. To me that 7 years were amazing we had a nice home and wonderful neighbors, friends and family close by with a bunch cousin on either side of the family. After the amazing 7 years, my mum had to go to the UK every other 6 months to renew her NHS number or PIN so while she was there, she was going through the procedure of bringing us back to Uk for University. This is when we heard the unknown factor in the UK citizens policy that I had to be in this country at least 3 years before me going into the Uni and to be in the UK before I turn 16. Now, this was even shocking to us as I was turning 16 in the next month. So, what we had to go through was intense as when my mum reached back from the Uk we were getting ready to catch the next flight back to the UK as a whole family.

Religion and Faith

“Religion is a social-cultural system of designated behaviors and practices, morals, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that relates humanity to supernatural, transcendental, or spiritual elements. However, there is no scholarly consensus over what precisely constitutes a religion.”

“Faith, derived from Latin fides and Old French feid, is confidence or trust in a person, thing, or concept. In the context of religion, one can define faith as confidence or trust in a system of religious belief. Religious people often think of faith as confidence based on a perceived degree of warrant, while others who are more skeptical of religion tend to think of faith as simply belief without evidence.”

These are the main definition that you would receive if you searched it on google. That is what normal people would do but, in this case, I would love to put these definitions in my way or a simpler term that I understand. Religion for me it all to do about concern and love that you would express for the fellow members that is or isn’t in your traditions and spiritual ways. In todays world there is harsh violence especially when it comes to the distress that everyone faces when they here the word Corona or in scientific terms COVID-19.  I am going to create a blog on this matter of concern on how it spread and how the world is copping with this matter at hand. Coming back to topic people are scared which is normal in this situation were people are struggling in the hospitals to grab some air. Talking about hospitals they were not prepared for this crisis at all. The lack of ventilators in the hospitals shows you the distress that the world face at the current time.

We can see how people can’t even see their loved ones for the last time before they taken back to soil. This is truly a disastrous thing to happen to the humankind. But as a normal person I think stuff that makes the right things look wrong at times. Sometimes when looking how this occurred, we can think that the nature is giving up on us. But anyway, that is just an opinion. When talking about Faith for me it quite the similar thing as religion but sometimes people take religion to an extreme that makes me to believe that faith is more important that religion.

Types of religion in the world now

The religions spectrum is forgotten in today s world it is meant to be love, care and how the father helps us to find true love or eternal love. First before we go into this, let us see the types of religion that the world offers today.

 Christianity 

 Muslim

Irreligious or atheist

 Hinduism

  Buddhists

 Sikhism

 Judaism

 Spiritism

Jainism

These are the main religions and beliefs. The religion with the highest population is Christianity. Which consist of 20 countries ranging from 100%-93.5%. the next in line is Muslim which a bit like Christianity which I will explain later in this blog. The Muslims consist of two types they are “Sunni” and “Shi’a”.  Most of the Muslims in the world are more than 1.5 Sunnis - estimates suggest the figure is somewhere between 85% and 90%. In the Middle East, Sunnis make up 90% or more of the populations of Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. Next is the people who don’t believe in any religions or the absence of belief. The countries that have the highest number of atheists are:

 China

  Japan

  Czech Republic

France

Australia

Iceland

 In America there is around 10% of atheist even when the dollar states an interesting phrase that is rather weird it says: “In God we Trust”. Approximately 40% of American atheists are ages 18-29, and 37% of atheists are ages 30-49. This is normal as this is the growing country and more people think practically but the biggest religion, though, is Christianity, which is practiced by an estimated 2.4 billion people in the world.