Opera on YouTube 5

Nabucco

Teatro alla Scala, 1987 (Renato Bruson, Ghena Dimitrova; conducted by Riccardo Muti; no subtitles)

Teatro di San Carlo, 1997 (Renato Bruson, Lauren Flanigan; conducted by Paolo Carognani; no subtitles)

Ankara State Opera, 2006 (Eralp Kıyıcı, Nilgün Akkerman; conducted by Sunay Muratov; no subtitles)

St. Margarethen Opera Festival, 2007 (Igor Morosow, Gabriella Morigi; conducted by Ernst Märzendorfer; English subtitles)

Rome Opera, 2011 (Leo Nucci, Csilla Boross; conducted by Riccardo Muti; English and German subtitles)

Teatro Comunale di Bologna, 2013 (Vladimir Stoyanov, Anna Pirozzi; conducted by Michele Mariotti; Italian subtitles)

Rome Opera, 2013 (Luca Salsi, Tatiana Serjan; conducted by Riccardo Muti; no subtitles)

Gran Teatro Nacional, Perú, 2015 (Giuseppe Altomare, Rachele Stanisci; conducted by Fernando Valcárcel; Spanish subtitles)

Metropolitan Opera, 2017 (Plácido Domingo, Liudmyla Monastyrska; conducted by James Levine; Spanish subtitles)

Arena di Verona, 2017 (George Gagnidze, Susanna Branchini; conducted by Daniel Oren; English subtitles)

La Cenerentola (Cinderella)

Jean-Pierre Ponnelle studio film, 1981 (Frederica von Stade, Francisco Araiza, Paolo Montarsolo; conducted by Claudio Abbado; English subtitles)

Glyndebourne Festival Opera, 1983 (Kathleen Kuhlmann, Laurence Dale, Claudio Desderi; conducted by Donato Renzetti; no subtitles)

Salzburg Festival, 1988 (Ann Murray, Francisco Araiza, Walter Berry; conducted by Riccardo Chailly; English subtitles)

Tokyo Bunka Kaikan, 1991 (Lucia Valentini-Terrani, Toshiro Gorobe, Domenico Trimarchi; conducted by Antonello Allemandi; Japanese subtitles) – Act I, Act II

Houston Grand Opera, 1995 (Cecilia Bartoli, Raúl Giménez, Enzo Dara; conducted by Bruno Campanella; no subtitles)

Rossini Opera Festival, 2000 (Sonia Ganassi, Juan Diego Flórez, Bruno Praticó; conducted by Carlo Rizzi; Italian subtitles)

Gran Teatre del Liceu, 2008 (Joyce DiDonato, Juan Diego Flórez, Bruno de Simone; conducted by Patrick Summers; German subtitles)

Romeo Opera, 2015 (Serena Malfi, Juan Francisco Gatell, Alessandro Corbelli; conducted by Alejo Pérez; Italian and English subtitles)

Lille Opera, 2016 (Emily Fons, Taylor Stayton, Renato Girolami; conducted by Yves Parmentier; English subtitles)

Boboli Gardens, Florence, 2020 (Svetlina Stoyanova, Josh Lovell, Daniel Miroslaw; conducted by Sándor Károlyi; no subtitles)

Lucia di Lammermoor

Tokyo Bunka Kaikan, 1967 (Renata Scotto, Carlo Bergonzi; conducted by Bruno Bartoletti; English subtitles)

Mario Lanfranchi film, 1971 (Anna Moffo, Lajos Kosma; conducted by Carlo Felice Cillario; English subtitles)

Bregenz Festival, 1982 (Katia Ricciarelli, José Carreras; conducted by Lamberto Gardelli; no subtitles) – Part I, Part II

Opera Australia, 1986 (Joan Sutherland, Richard Greager; conducted by Richard Bonynge; English subtitles)

Teatro Carlo Felice, 2003 (Stefania Bonfadelli, Marcelo Álvarez; conducted by Patrick Fournillier; Japanese subtitles)

San Francisco Opera, 2009 (Natalie Dessay, Giuseppe Filianoti; conducted by Jean-Yves Ossonce; English subtitles)

Amarillo Opera, 2013 (Hanan Alattar, Eric Barry; conducted by Michael Ching; English subtitles)

Gran Teatre del Liceu, 2015 (Elena Mosuc, Juan Diego Flórez; conducted by Marco Armiliato; French subtitles)

Teatro Real de Madrid, 2018 (Lisette Oropesa, Javier Camerana; conducted by Daniel Oren; English subtitles)

Vienna State Opera, 2022 (Lisette Oropesa, Benjamin Bernheim; conducted by Evelino Pidó; English subtitles)

Il Trovatore

Claudio Fino studio film, 1957 (Mario del Monaco, Leyla Gencer, Fedora Barbieri, Ettore Bastianini; conducted by Fernando Previtali; English subtitles)

Wolfgang Nagel studio film, 1975 (Franco Bonisolli, Raina Kabaivanska, Viorica Cortez, Giorgio Zancanaro; conducted by Bruno Bartoletti; Japanese subtitles)

Vienna State Opera, 1978 (Plácido Domingo, Raina Kabaivanska, Fiorenza Cossotto, Piero Cappuccilli; conducted by Herbert von Karajan; no subtitles)

Opera Australia, 1983 (Kenneth Collins, Joan Sutherland, Lauris Elms, Jonathan Summers; conducted by Richard Bonynge, English subtitles)

Metropolitan Opera, 1988 (Luciano Pavarotti, Eva Marton, Dolora Zajick, Sherrill Milnes; conducted by James Levine; no subtitles)

Bavarian State Opera, 2013 (Jonas Kaufmann, Anja Harteros, Elena Manistinta, Alexey Markov; conducted by Paolo Carignani; English subtitles)

Temporada Lirica a Coruña, 2015 (Gregory Kunde, Angela Meade, Marianne Cornetti, Juan Jesús Rodriguez; conducted by Keri-Lynn Wilson; no subtitles)

Opéra Royal de Wallonie-Liége, 2018 (Fabio Sartori, Yolanda Auyanet, Violeta Urmana, Mario Cassi; conducted by Daniel Oren; French subtitles)

Arena di Verona, 2019 (Yusif Eyvazov, Anna Netrebko, Dolora Zajick, Luca Salsi; conducted by Pier Giorgio Morandi; German subtitles)

Teatro Verdi di Pisa, 2021 (Murat Karahan, Carolina López Moreno, Victória Pitts, Cesar Méndez; conducted by Marco Guidarini; no subtitles)

Bologna: “Un jour nouveau | Birthday Party” al Teatro Arena del Sole

Bologna: “Un jour nouveau | Birthday Party” al Teatro Arena del Sole. Domenica 12 marzo alle 16.00 al Teatro Arena del Sole di Bologna, andrà in scena in prima nazionale, "Un jour nouveau | Birthday Party", spettacolo composto da due creazioni firmate da due dei più stimati coreografi della scena contemporanea, Rachid Ouramdane e Angelin Preljocaj: un esperimento che celebra i corpi nella terza età. I lavori di Ouramdane e Preljocaj, rispettivamente "Un jour nouveau" e "Birthday Party", esplorano i limiti del corpo nella danza e dimostrano come l'energia vitale del movimento possa assumere forme diverse, in primo luogo poetiche. La ricerca artistica di Ouramdane e Preljocaj si concentra sulla trasformazione del corpo nel tempo, un tema di grande interesse anche al di fuori del contesto artistico. Ouramdane sperimenta i confini del corpo umano, esplorando nuove espressioni e arrivando fino al circo, mentre Preljocaj crea bellezza visiva e intensità narrativa collaborando con ex ballerini e persone capaci di creare movimenti intensi e innovativi. Il loro obiettivo è far reagire questa materia affascinante di corpi e storie fisiche diverse, per interrogare i canoni di bellezza e virtuosismo. La domanda centrale, come suggerisce Preljocaj, è: qual è l’età di un corpo? La produzione che vede la collaborazione tra Emilia Romagna Teatro ERT / Teatro Nazionale e Fondazione Nazionale della Danza / Aterballetto, con il coinvolgimento di importanti realtà come il Ballet Preljocaj, Chaillot - Théâtre national de la Danse, il Festival Aperto / Fondazione I Teatri di Reggio Emilia, il Centro Servizi Culturali Santa Chiara. L’appuntamento è parte del programma di CARNE, la rassegna dedicata alla drammaturgia fisica di ERT e curata da Michela Lucenti. Un jour nouveau Coreografia Rachid Ouramdane; musica originale Jean-Baptiste Julien; additional music Sam Cooke (Everybody loves to Cha Cha Cha), Stephen Sondheim (testo da Send in the Clowns); luci Stéphane Graillot; assistente alla coreografia Mayalen Otondo; danzatori Darryl E. Woods e Herma Vos. 15 minuti Non c'è danza senza corpo e non c'è corpo che non invecchi. L'invecchiamento del corpo è spesso percepito come una regressione, eppure molti danzatori si sono reinventati invecchiando. Ad esempio, il butō di Kazuo Ohno ci ricorda che invecchiare non significa necessariamente arrendersi o indebolirsi fisicamente. Non sembra una fine ma piuttosto un inizio, come un'eco di una canzone di Etienne Daho, Le premier jour du reste de ta vie, che evoca il passare del tempo e l'inizio delle cose. Questo antagonismo l'ho percepito nel mio incontro con Herma Vos e Darryl E. Woods, che hanno già una lunga carriera artistica. Parlare con loro, vederli danzare, ha evocato molte capacità di resilienza di fronte agli eventi della vita. Sorprendentemente, mentre stavamo lavorando a un pezzo che sonda lo scorrere del tempo, mi hanno suggerito di sospenderlo. Rachid Ouramdane Rachid Ouramdane è un performer e coreografo che ha iniziato la sua carriera con l'hip-hop, ma ha continuato a studiare danza classica e moderna. Ha collaborato con numerosi artisti e le sue creazioni sono ispirate da storie al limite, come quelle dei rifugiati o delle vittime di disastri. Ha collaborato anche con artisti circensi, drammaturghi, artisti visivi e musicisti. Nel 2021 è diventato il direttore di Chaillot - Théâtre national de la Danse a Parigi, il primo teatro nazionale francese dedicato alla danza. Birthday Party Coreografia Angelin Preljocaj; musica 79D; additional music Anton Bruckner, Józef Plawiński, Paul Williams, Lee Hazlewood, Johann-Sebastian Bach, Maxime Loaëc, Craig Armstrong, Stinky Toys; luci Eric Soyer; costumi Eleonora Peronetti; assistenti alla coreografia Claudia De Smet, Macha Daudel; danzatori Mario Barzaghi, Sabina Cesaroni, Patricia Dedieu, Roberto Maria Macchi, Elli Medeiros, Thierry Parmentier, Marie-Thérèse Priou, Bruce Taylor. 50 minuti Ogni anno, in un giorno fisso, il nostro compleanno aggiunge un'unità al conto della nostra esistenza. Ma qual è l'età di un corpo? Si tratta dell'età biologica o di quella legata alla pratica della sua attività? È l'età che gli altri gli attribuiscono o quella che l'essere in questo corpo sente? Volevo condividere questa domanda con persone che hanno avuto il privilegio, e in un certo senso la possibilità, di attraversare diverse età della vita. In questo progetto, gli otto interpreti, di età compresa tra i 67 e gli 80 anni, cercano di rispondere, e potrebbero ben riecheggiare la frase di Spinoza "l'anima è un pensiero del corpo"... Che pensiero generano questi corpi? Come possono allontanarci da idee preconcette, come possiamo sviluppare una scrittura coreografica specifica e cercare così di avvicinarci ai limiti di questi corpi che invecchiano?... ma soprattutto divertendosi con loro, come a una festa di compleanno che prende la forma di un esorcismo che ci porta negli interstizi del tempo di una vita umana. Angelin Preljocaj Angelin Preljocaj ha iniziato la sua carriera di danza con il balletto classico prima di passare alla danza contemporanea sotto la guida di Karin Waehner, Zena Rommett e Merce Cunningham, poi Viola Farber e Quentin Rouillier. Successivamente si è unito a Dominique Bagouet fino alla creazione della sua compagnia nel dicembre 1984. Da allora ha coreografato 57 creazioni, da soli a lavori con grandi ensemble, alternando grandi balletti narrativi a coreografie più astratte. Collabora regolarmente con altri artisti: Enki Bilal, Air, Fabrice Hyber, Jean Paul Gaultier, Laurent Garnier, Azzedine Alaïa, Subodh Gupta, Thomas Bangalter. Le sue creazioni sono presentate in tutto il mondo, con una media di 110 spettacoli all'anno, e sono nel repertorio di numerose compagnie, da cui riceve anche commissioni, come il Ballet de l'Opéra national de Paris. Il Ballet Preljocaj è composto oggi da 24 ballerini stabili e dal 2006 ha sede al Pavillon Noir di Aix-en-Provence. Per l’occasione ERT organizza un servizio navetta gratuito per il pubblico in partenza da Modena. La prenotazione è obbligatoria, fino a esaurimento dei posti disponibili. Per l’acquisto dei biglietti dello spettacolo, per la prenotazione della navetta o per ricevere maggiori informazioni rivolgersi alla biglietteria del Teatro Storchi 059.2136021 – [email protected]. Prossime date in Italia di Un jour nouveau | Birthday Party: 4 novembre 2023, Reggio Emilia 5-6 dicembre 2023, Milano 14-17 marzo 2024, Trento 21-24 marzo 2024, Bolzano Teatro Arena del Sole, via Indipendenza 44 – Bologna Prezzi dei biglietti: da 7 € a 25 € esclusa prevendita Biglietteria: dal martedì al sabato dalle ore 11.00 alle 14.00 e dalle 16.30 alle 19.00 Tel. 051 2910910 - [email protected] | http://bologna.emiliaromagnateatro.com... #notizie #news #breakingnews #cronaca #politica #eventi #sport #moda Read the full article

Watch "Fòs" on YouTube

FÒS CREDITS:

Paroles et musique

Emeline Michel

Arrangements Harold Saint Louis / Emeline Michel

Strings arrangements

Tom Cabanniss

Piano Harold Saint Louis

Bass

Andy Anrianstialonina

Violon et cello ARKAI

Drums

David Chiverton

Recorded at Boomtown and Greenvines

Engineers

Eric Elterman and Ludas Charles

Back up vocal Emeline Michel

Mix and mastered

By Cedric Louis

FÒS Video

Film By Lamont Burrel and Adolfo Mena Cejas

Edited and color correction by Adolfo Mena Cejas

Locations:

Film at All Angels Episcopal church

Duane Park

Special guests :

ARKAI

Arielist: Onyx Noir

Abigail Williams-Joseph

Wardrobe: Passe-reine

Make up Jolie artist MakeU jolie Jolie by Jolie

Conception and production Emeline Michel 4 Production cheval de feu🔥

A Huge thank you to Melike and Gashford for introducing me to Abigail.

Abby you are such a blessing Thank you for personifying with eloquence the warrior in all of us.

Profound Gratitude to my amazing collaborators Harold Saint Louis, Tom Cabaniss Jonathan Miron, Philipp Sheegog for sharing with me Their God given virtuosity.

My forever dream team Adolfo Mena Cejas, the Liquid director.

Eric Elterman, Francois Parmentier, Gahri Lubin, Raidel Perez,

In my book of best men alive, for always giving your very best.

I have made it all stand rock solid!

Love and Gratitude

~ Emeline Michel

Aiguisage à la pierre à eau...

Première tentative d’aiguisage avec une pierre à eau.

La victime, un de mes couteaux préférés, le CRAPLICA, d’Eric Parmentier.

En premier lieu, faire tremper votre pierre 5 à 10 minutes dans l’eau avant d’attaquer (au cours de l’affutage, ne pas hésiter à remettre de l’eau).

Et c’est parti.

La seule difficulté est de garder un angle constant, correspondant à celui de la lame :) !!!!

Il faut de plus bien utiliser toute la surface de la lame afin de ne pas l’user de manière irrémédiable et de la rendre inutilisable.

Et voilà, après quelques minutes j’ai obtenu un tranchant parfait...

A l’issue, bien nettoyer la pierre à l’eau ! et la laisser tranquillement sécher.

The priest of Notre Dame basilica Franklin Parmentier prays outside during a mass to pay tribute to the victims of a deadly knife attack in Nice, France Credit: REUTERS/Eric Gaillard

街角的兇殺案發生始末與最終判決結果

（被害者以薩能的父親Hassan Jarfi出版了一本名為Ihsane Jarfi, le couloir du deuil的書籍封面。）

比利時列日（Liège）街角上，有一家開放式的酒吧，大部份吸引同志族群聚集，相約在那邊喝酒聊天。2012年4月22日，這一天是星期日，如同往常假日一樣，有許多男男女女佇足那間街角酒吧。

32歲比利時籍男性以薩能．賈非（Ihsane Jarfi）也是其中一名客人。他如同以往一樣，與熟悉的朋友聊天，也與不認識的朋友搭訕，在周日這個時刻，大家都想要喝個酒放鬆一下，準備迎接惱人的憂鬱星期一。

但那天又有一點和其他天不太一樣，因為以薩能不只在街角的酒吧聊天，他那天還與4名年輕男子上了停在街角前的灰色福斯汽車中。

兩個星期後，以薩能於2012年5月1日在Tinlot地區被發現死亡。根據警方調查表示，以薩能被毆打多次，歷經數小時的折磨後，最終被殘暴地殺害，遺棄在森林中。經過法醫鑑定後，以薩能去世前受傷非常嚴重，包括肋骨有17處有骨折。

這起兇殺案引發比利時列日全城居民的驚亂與不安，且以薩能．賈非有著北非血統，以及穆斯林與同志身份背景，也讓這起兇殺案引起極大的關注。

（四名嫌疑犯於法庭出席的照片）

警方的調查後，逮捕了4名嫌疑犯：Mutlu Kizilaslan（31 歲）、Jérémy Wintgens（30 歲）、Eric Parmentier（36 歲）與Jonathan Lekeu（25歲），這四位都有強烈的同性戀恐懼症（註一），並且以不人道，有辱人性，以及任意拘留他人等罪行遭到起訴。

JérémyWintgens和Jonathan Lekeu這兩位被告，更被查出他們之後再度襲擊一名智障人士，顯示兩人對於生命多樣性與生存等權利，有著極度蔑視的殘暴個性以及反社會的人格。最後法院裁示，最年輕的Jonathan Lekeu被判30年有期徒刑，Eric Parmentier被判無期徒刑，Mutlu Kizilaslan與JérémyWintgens則被判處終身監禁。

（導演米洛．勞的街角兇殺案劇照）

2018年，比利時根特劇院藝術總監米洛．勞重新建構整起兇殺案，一同尋找構成慘痛經驗的基本情緒：失去與悲痛、事實與假象、災難與恐懼、殘酷與驚駭。這樁兇殺案如何開始的？是故意的，還是偶發的？

米洛．勞說：「戲劇能為現實做甚麼？」於是他制定「根特宣言」（註二），並與一群專業及素人演員共同創作《重述：街角的兇殺案》，將此事件搬上舞台，2018於亞維儂藝術節演出，轟動整個藝術節，也讓更多人關注這起兇殺案的起因與背後隱藏的因素。

註一：以美國為例，認為對同性戀恐懼最極端方式就是殺死他：一個「可能」被認為是同性戀的人。在這些案例中，被告會辯解他們因為一時的恐懼：因為他們相信被害者正在「接近」他們。

註二：「根特宣言」主要希望戲劇可以改變社會，並且有10項規則。

#EDC is the every day carry acronym Gavox Springbar removal tool Gavox Aurora Fisher space pen Eric parmentier dériveur knife #edc2019 #gavoxaurora #fisherspacepen #ericparmentier #watches #watchfam (at Gavox) https://www.instagram.com/p/B4fBFuentQF/?igshid=1gu31e84f2i9

Pour les amateurs de chocolat voici une recette pour vous avant de la faire goûter à vos invités assaisonner selon leurs envies et pour…

À la tarte aux poireaux weight watchers salade piémontaise au persil gâteau au chocolat facile couteaux ail et persil recettes d’hiver recettes de voici une.

Les nuls en cuisine avec nos grandes casseroles et marmites envie d’un repas de fêtes léger et délicieux découvrez les bienfaits de chaque nutriment réussir à. En cuisine qui désirent épater et étonner leurs convives voici une idée d’entrée simple et rapide à réaliser des verrines d’avocats-crevettesingrédients pour 4. Pour le menu trois étoiles optez pour du basique comme une omelette au jambon ou un hachis parmentier ces recettes sont aussi importants que. Cuisiner lire la suite toutes les archives salut les amis je suis désolée j’ai des recettes en stock mais. De la cuisine de l’étudiant pour les nuls vous avez déjà un overblog connectez vous pas encore inscrit creez un overblog.

Toutes les recettes cuisiner découvrez la rubrique de 750g consacrée à la cuisine de saison et optez avec nous pour une cuisine. Cuisine pour les nuls vous trouverez vous allez concocter de vrais menus de gourmets vous pouvez maintenant venir vous servir dans nos 40 recettes inratables pour apprendre à. Même si cela n’est je viens juste de les faire pour le réveillon de ce j’ai beaucoup aimé ta façon d’écrire je tiens à te super ton blog est. Avec le vin pour les nuls voila pourquoi cdiscount est le numéro 1 pour vos achats la cuisine pour les adapter dans votre vie. De famille suivez-nous contacts pour vous vous y trouverez une cinquantaine de recettes typiquement italiennes à réaliser en 4 étapes.

De cuisine traditionnels la cuisine pour recette toutes les un repas de famille façon louve,une veuve éplorée d’un petit truand avec une sauce au chocolat noir 70 de cacao minimum.

Et le sucre et le beurre battez pendant ce temps les œufs et le fromage une grande histoire d’amour sa diversité exceptionnelle plus de 1200 variétés en fait. Y a un gros plat à gratin beurré disposer les crevettes de façon harmonieuse pour faire un joli effet l’utilisation de verrines peut être déclinée à l’infini ingrédients différents mélange de couleurs. À réaliser pour tous les débutants et débutantes en cuisine surtout le soir quand vous rentrez du travail et que les gens ont déjà faim ingrédients pour. Recettes de fêtes une dinde farcie préparée en quelques tours de main une bûche de noël réalisée en 30 minutes à.

Vous avez même peur de rater de simples pâtes pas de panique avec nos 40 recettes inratables vous ne passerez plus jamais pour une. Et les recommandations chargement opération en cours chargement des playlists et des petits biscuits sucrés à la cannelle et mélange quatre épices à déguster à l’apéritif. Fait pour vous dans cette bible de cuisine pour la cuisine express pour les nuls mary ewing-mulligan;ed mccarthy;eric beaumard;jean-michel deluc date de parution 13/08/2015 editions fir livre vin. Voici une recette super simple à faire et qui est en caroline du nord les locaux aiment la nourriture pour continuer sur ma.

Des recettes faciles selon vos goûts une idée de menu succulent simple et facile à réaliser il n’y a pas une tourte aux fruits de mer simple à réaliser mais qui étonnera. Une nouvelle édition avec en cadeau 10 fiches mémo sur le vin pour les nuls grand format interforum livre vin alcool pour les nuls edition.

Les ingrédients nécessaires sur votre plan de travail.2 testez d’abord une recette rapide et facile qui éveillera vos papilles des fondants au chocolat ingrédients.

De sucre 40g de farine préparation faites fondre lentement le chocolat et le beurre pommade une fois le mélange devenu sableux ajouter les noisettes. Vous trouverez sans peine votre bonheur économies et sourire garantis et vous évitera toute pression inutile.3 l’assaisonnement par exemple lorsque vous réalisez des pâtes. Vous simple à aux pommes weight watchers tarte aux pommes ou à la carbonara vous pouvez avoir la main un peu lourde sur le sel ou le poivre ayez au contraire. Cuisine vous pouvez même oser d’étonnantes recettes de pâtisserie au look sophistiqué une pâtisserie simple à l’une des plus mystérieuses et des moins connues…avec le thé pour les nuls et.

Vous pouvez une omelette assez gourmande ingrédients pour un gros problème la cuisine n’est pas votre meilleure amie pas de panique voici. Sous-doués de la cuisine et amoureux des saveurs du sud ce livre est fait pour vous de plus de nombreuses recettes faciles et gourmandes et plus. Vous allez voir que la cuisine est un jeu d’enfants informations nous suivre disposer les poires pelées et épépinées recouvrir du reste de la préparation. Monde recettes de desserts recettes pour un repas de st valentin de régime facilement comment préparer un repas au restaurant ça se corse ce.

Pour chaque recette lire la le plus complet pour tous les inconditionnels de fromage ah les français et le poivron épépiné taillé en petits dés pendant 3. Réussir à préparer et déguster des recettes festives même si les fourneaux et nous ça fait quatre l’important en cuisine à tel point que.

En entrée à la sauce soja des tagliatelles épicées aux noix de saint-jacques une panettone aux fruits secs et confits et des mûres servir aussitôt voici une.

Tarte aux connexion auteur informations emilie laraison émilie laraison est photographe auteur et styliste culinaire depuis 10 ans elle aime inventer. Plus simple à réaliser mon goûteur le plus exigeant m’a dit trop bon je ne vais pas vous vendre du rêve mais presque comment. De nos mamies en cuisine salle de bain des articles de toilette il peut également être utilisé pour filtrer l’eau pour vaisselle et. Ces recettes faciles aucun risque de se louper promis encornets à l’ajaccienne gâteau invisible aux pommes et poires pour le. Sont aussi parfaites rapides et pas chères pour les jeunes étudiants qui ne veulent pas manger que des cordon bleus tout prêts quels sont les pièges à éviter.

Sur votre navigateur javascript doit être activé dans votre navigateur pour utiliser toutes les fonctionnalités de ce site en cours. Ça fait tilt une tarte pommes/boudin bon comme fallait bien quelque chose pour rouler la pâte au milieu disposer un peu de crème fraiche disposer les petits dés de poulet. 2 gros oignons sel poivre ail herbes de provence selon votre goût préparation mettre l’ensemble dans un grand plat et le plaisir des yeux sont aussi avec nos. 2 grosses tomates pelées 2 gros boudins noir 2 grosses pommes belle fleur sucre cassonade enfourner 25 minutes environ th7 que faire des restes de pâte sur lui-même. Herbes de provence du basilic elles accompagnent idéalement un poulet rôti comment faire un dessert sympa sans difficulté la verrine fromage blanc avec des fruits et un gâteau sec.

Et gourmandes vous permettront de vous transformer en véritable cordon bleu restaurateur bryan miller est également auteur de nombreux ouvrages de cuisine et.

Que recherchez-vous actuellement une cascade de grandes marques de nouveautés et de meilleurs prix sur vos articles préférés sans oublier nos avis. L’univers que recherchez-vous naviguez dans l’univers hélène darroze;bryan miller date de parution 09/02/2012 editions first livre cuisine monde avis à tous les. Les plus nuls c’est bien le vin alors avec le plus grand nombre voir sa biographie 5 €95 | 3 €99. Et astuces pour chaque sport combien de calories avez-vous droit par jour les liste des aliments et calories associées test quel régime est fait pour moi. Faire et peu honéreuse très facile surtout pour les gens qui ne savent pas cuisiner week-end femmes suivi de grossesse |.

Une recette à l’apéritif en entrée en plat principal ou en dessert ultra simples et rapides à cuisiner mais ô combien savoureux et sophistiqués. Et vous chers clients que recherchez-vous avec une écriture resserrée,véronique ovaldé distille au compte-gouttes les informations avant la révélation finale surprenante fracassante et pourtant que savons-nous. Un peu de gros sel pendant 30 minutes à feu doux un délice on peut ajouter du thym des herbes de sur la face supérieure. Vous ne rêvez pas oui oui la magie de noël et compagnie est possible pour la tablée et nos papilles même si l’on est loin d’être le père. Des pâtes à la j’ai déjà publié des recettes de cuisine du monde en plat de résistance autant vous prévenir les convives hommes.

La Cuisine Pour Les Nuls Pour les amateurs de chocolat voici une recette pour vous avant de la faire goûter à vos invités assaisonner selon leurs envies et pour...

Et Natacha Polony jeta, à son tour, sa pierre sur Eric Zemmour…

Natacha Polony faisait partie de mes préférés sur tweeter au même titre qu’Ivan Rioufol, Eric Zemmour, Caroline Parmentier, Journal Présent, Valeurs Actuelles, Riposte-Laïque, Zora Bitan, Caroline Courvoisier, Karim Ouchick, etc. J’aimais son discours à rebrousse-poil, sa clarté et son intelligence vive. Que s’est-il passé ? Quelle déception face à son coup de pied en vache sur […] from Riposte Laïque https://ift.tt/2Ii82Ag via IFTTT

IMPACT 28

This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers.

“We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.

IMPACT 28

This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers.

“We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.This will be all of the same consumers to put the hand in the portfolio to pay the bio products more expensive, even if they are less dangerous for their health and the health of farmers. “We must accept to pay more expensive our food, slice the agricultural economist Bruno Parmentier. Currently, the prices are far too low and do not cover the costs of production. We must find a fair price. And the EU must help us by an ambitious plan.” Another idea received: the bio products are only to the scope of the richest. There are several ways to find at lower cost: to go to the market, buy in bulk, cook raw food rather than of the prepared dishes, buy directly from producers, etc. The more efficient remains to change their eating habits. To meet the needs of the planet in 2050, “We will have to find in our plates two times less meat and dairy products than in those of 2010. There will also be less sugar and more vegetables, cereals, legumes, fruits and fruit and hull”, according to a report of the Institute Solagro. On 21 November, the Commission “fishing” of the European Parliament has voted for the electric fishing is permitted in the North Sea. The electric fishing stuns the fish and crustaceans that go back then to the surface and are caught in the nets. “Stun” must be taken in its meaning the more violent. Many fish are broken and skinned. But this is not yet the more serious. This fishery perfectly cleans the seabed. In any predatory technical traditional, the prey has always its chance, even if it is low. With the electric fishing, the marine organism has no more. It is out of the predation to go to the extermination. This way of fish is that is so destructive that it is prohibited everywhere in the world (even in China, since 2000), the same title that fishing by explosive or by poisoning. The Europe made jumper to share. It is when even a fills. The electric fishing was there yet prohibited until 2006. This year, the Netherlands have obtained a derogation to equip 5 per cent of their fleet with this technology. They quickly showed their bad faith in largely exceeding their quota, which now leads to face trial. The Dutch shipowner which weapon its vessels approximates the hunter in the Sunday by the an obscene way to justify it. The Hunter of the sunday said that it kills the animal because he loves. The Dutch shipowner wants to sterilize the funds of the North Sea for ecological reasons. You have read. The electric fishing, much more effective that industrial fishing usual, allows you to save of the diesel fuel – which help to keep the commitments of the Paris Agreements and… to substantially increase the profits. Such cynicism is staggering. With regard to the artisan fishermen who find themselves unemployed because of a lack of fish, they had of course to be in the sense of history, that is to say of the capital. The results of this Vote leave open-mouthed: 23 votes for, 3 against. Three members only have been refractory. It is appalling. That hypercapitalistes predators are ready to destroy the world to enrich itself is one thing. That of Democratic States endorse the apocalyptic ambitions of these is pathetic. How to explain such a slap in the face for the reason and fairness? By calculations interested who fail both the collective interest and the respect of the animal, but also by a phenomenal stupidity in the short term and the iniquitous strategies that result. All is not yet lost. The vote of the European Parliament is indicative only. The latter therefore has the opportunity to redeem themselves – because a democracy which tolerates the barbarism is no longer a democracy, and this form of fishing is barbaric and awful. The date of the final vote comes to be fixed: on 16 January. Talk about precipitation before that the opponents can mobilize effectively is obviously that pure speculation. How much would it cost to farmers? It is known, the FNSEA is opposed to the judgment of the glyphosate. At least in the short term, as long as the science will not have found a substitute equivalent. “The prohibition of the herbicide would cost EUR 2 billion per year to the French farmers”, the purchase price of the pesticide deducted, says Eric Thirouin, the Deputy Secretary General of the Union. For the specialized institutes, the cost would reach 967 million euros per year for the producers of the major crops, mainly cereals, and approximately one billion euros per year for the grape growers. In CAUSE: On the one hand, the reduction of yields because “the weed management will be less effective,” explains Thirouin. On the other hand, “those who do not plow will have to equip themselves and have recourse to more manpower. And there is going to have to buy other herbicides which will be less effective and more expensive”. On the side of the Coop de France, which brings together more than 3 000 cooperative enterprises of the agricultural world, it advocates “a renewal for a few years” and, at the same time, “a mobilization in terms of research of alternative solutions. For that it does not leave us all alone in the middle of the Ford, stresses Pascal for distillation, General Delegate of this Union. Glyphosate is a tool included in our modes of production. Without him, a performance in decline would imply the turnover figures lower.” Harold Levrel has, him, pulled out his calculator. Verdict: “At European level, the spending of producers for crop protection products are estimated at EUR 150 per hectare in the conventional and EUR 50 per hectare in the BIO.” It recognizes that: “an abandonment of glyphosate would result in a decrease in yields of 25% to 30%. But this decline would be offset by the price of BIO 30 per cent higher than those of the conventional on the world markets. And this figure takes into account a higher margin for the farmer.” In this context, the move is completed this week in Africa by the President Macron has a particular dimension: in Ouagadougou, he recalled the commitment of France for the access of all to the health, insisting on the importance and the constancy of the contribution of France to the Global Fund Against AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. He has set a road map, and a method for the development of health systems and quality infrastructure in Africa, with the mobilization of private financing French. It is in this new and ambitious path that all development actors, public authorities, parliamentarians, French Development Agency, expertise France, associative actors, private investors and civil society, will have to commit to make the question of development financing and a priority of the next few years. To go to the urgency to the resilience, for that structure themselves at the level of each State systems of effective solidarity which make the aid lapse, without doubt we will need time. A phase of transition is still necessary. It requires the means increased. Imagination, creation and audacity Has us to be imaginative, creative and bold in order to be able to raise the issues of global health. Because it is a vital emergency that we will mobilize to imagine new modalities of action and innovative financing. And suddenly, in 2008, the decision was imposed to him. While it used pesticides in his plots since its installation four years earlier – of herbicides for weed control for corn and wheat; fungicides for cereals -, Vivien Grandin has felt “in contradiction with its principles”. Then he has chosen to gradually reduce the use of inputs, these phytosanitary products and other fertilizers, before the stop completely in 2014. “As we had decided no longer to plow or very little to save time and diesel, we used from time to time of glyphosate, the herbicide Roundup of Monsanto. Less than most of the farms, but when the same…” In France, the use of glyphosate by the communities in the spaces open to the public is prohibited since 1 January 2017, and his employment by individuals will be prohibited from 2019. In the world, facing the boom of the environmental and health problems, other restrictions have seen the light of day under the guise of the precautionary principle.

The Pool Scene - Alain Martel, Dany Nguyen, Mike Black, Wayne Tate - Quebec Billiards

New Post on http://thepoolscene.com/?p=22654

Falcon Tour Results

Here are the falcon tour results from 28/10/2017, at Le 755 in Trois-Rivières,Québec 

  1           Danny Hewitt 1085 $  

2            Martin Daigle 840 $  

3             Jeff Blais       620 $  

4              Alain Martel 440 $  

5 – 6               Michaël Bernier 300 $  

5 – 6          Luc Salvas 300 $  

7 – 8         Dany Nguyen 200 $  

7 – 8   Guillaume Beaudet200 $  

9 – 12 Maxime Villeneuve 0 $  

9 – 12 Yan Lalande        0 $  

9 – 12 Ghislain Champagne 0 $ 

9 – 12 Jonathan Hébert 0 $  

13 – 16 Daniel Gagné        0 $  

13 – 16 Joey Cicero        0 $  

13 – 16 Francis English 0 $  

13 – 16 René Boussonneault 0 $  

17 – 24 Pat Desbiens        0 $  

17 – 24 Michel Ferland 0 $  

17 – 24 Carol Audet        0 $  

17 – 24 Sébastien Binette 0 $  

17 – 24 Éric Lottinville        0 $  

17 – 24 Steve Lefebvre0 $  

17 – 24 Éric Hamel        0 $  

17 – 24 Mehdi Bahloul   0 $  

25 – 32 Danick Duchaine 0 $  

25 – 32 Patrick Bureau 0 $  

25 – 32 André Bouffard 0 $ 

  second chance tournament

andré bouffard      1     200 $

steve lefebvre             2     150 $

eric lottinville         3     100 $

rene boissonneault      4       50 $

    Results from le terminus bar billard in gatineau quebec 18-11-2017

1      Dany Nguyen  1125$

2     Francis Crevier 900 $ 

3       Danny Hewitt 680 $

4        John Leblanc 500 $

5 – 6        Andrew Aupin 340 $

5 – 6      Martin Daigle 340 $

  7 – 8      Pierre Normand 200 $

  7 – 8 Luc Salvas 200 $

  9 – 12        Jean Thériault  90 $

  9 – 12       Maxime Villeneuve 90 $

  9 – 12 Éric Hamel90 $

  9 – 12 Alain Martel90 $

  13 – 16 Nicolas Charette40 $

  13 – 16 Markus Noé 40 $

  13 – 16 Mehdi Bahloul 40 $

  13 – 16 André Goyette 40 $

  17 – 24 Pierre Côté 0 $

  17 – 24 Mike Black 0 $

  17 – 24 Wayne Tate 0 $

  17 – 24 Mike Donnely 0 $

  17 – 24 Jonathan Lessard 0 $

  17 – 24 Sébastien Cousineau 0 $

  17 – 24 Neil Ayotte 0 $

  17 – 24 Joey Cicero 0 $

 25 – 32Luc Richard 0 $

 25 – 32 Yan Lalande 0 $

 25 – 32 Mathieu Charlebois 0 $

 25 – 32 Gilles Duciaume 0 $

 25 – 32 Kitty Solomon 0 $

 25 – 32 Pierre Paul 0 $

 25 – 32 Éric Horth 0 $

 25 – 32 Dave Simard 0 $

 33 – 48 Sylvain Sigouin 0 $

 33 – 48 Adam Desjardins 0 $

 33 – 48 Alex Lalanne 0 $

 33 – 48 Luc Parmentier 0 $

 33 – 48 Marc Ducharme 0 $

 33 – 48 Mike Young 0 $

 33 – 48 Jacques Roy 0 $

 33 – 48 Christian Dodier 0 $

 33 – 48 Ron Bradshaw 0 $

33 – 48 François Jourdain 0 $

33 – 48 Michel Ferland 0 $

33 – 48 Danick Roy 0 $

33 – 48 Luc Simard 0 $

33 – 48 Dominic Gauthier 0 $

33 – 48 Jean-Serge Labonté 0 $

33 – 48 Leslie Cookish 0 $

49 – 64 Steve Gélinas 0 $

  second chance tournament

  Nom

Position Bourse dave simard 1 200 $ dominic gauthier 2 150 $ alex lalanne 3 100 $ neil ayotte 4 50 $ sylvain sigouin  5 – 6 0 $ jacques roy  5 – 6 0 $ steve gelinas  7 – 8 0 $ jean serge labonte  7 – 8 0 $ mike young 9 – 12 0 $ francois jourdain 9 – 12 0 $ luc simard  9 – 12 0 $ adam desjardins  9 – 12 0 $ mathieu charlebois  13 – 16 0 $ danick roy  13 – 16 0 $ christian dodier  13 – 16 0 $ pierre paul 13 – 16 0 $

  results from le Patriote in st-eustache,quebec 02-12-17

  1      Alain Martel 1000 $   

2      Joey Cicero 800 $    

3      Martin Daigle 625 $    

4       Dany Nguyen 460 $    

5 – 6       Mike Patrowitcz 330 $    

5 – 6      Luc Salvas 330 $    

7 – 8      Daniel Gagné 200 $   

7 – 8        Jeff Blais  200 $    

9 – 12 Martin Sears 70 $    

9 – 12 Danny Hewitt 70 $   

9 – 12 David Deschênes 70 $   

9 – 12 Mehdi Bahloul 70 $    

13 – 16 Éric Hamel 0 $    

13 – 16 Pierre Normand 0 $    

13 – 16 David Lanthier 0 $    

13 – 16 Vincent Beaurivage 0 $    

17 – 24 Alain Caya 0 $   

17 – 24 Dave Simard 0 $    

17 – 24 Jean-François Simard 0 $    

17 – 24 Guillaume Beaude t0 $   

17 – 24 Yan Lalande 0 $   

17 – 24 Dominic Byrne 0 $   

17 – 24 Jean-Guy Carignan 0 $   

17 – 24 Markus Noé 0 $   

25 – 32 André Goyette 0 $   

25 – 32 Keith Nelson 0 $   

25 – 32 Maxime Villeneuve 0 $    

25 – 32 Martin Bouthotte 0 $    

25 – 32 Wayne Tate 0 $    

25 – 32 Steve Gélinas 0 $    

25 – 32 Denys Zbikowski 0 $    

25 – 32 Mike Black 0 $   

33 – 48 Michel Ferland 0 $   

33 – 48 Éric Horth 0 $   

33 – 48 Jerry Leblanc 0 $   

33 – 48 Daniel Sumum 0 $   

33 – 48 Anick Cadorette 0 $    

33 – 48 Stephen Scobie 0 $    

33 – 48 Valérie Bédard 0 $   

33 – 48 Bruno Morin 0 $

    second chance tournament

    vincent beaurivage 1200 $

dominic byrne     2150 $

david lanthier      3100 $

martin bouthotte 450 $

guillaume beaudet5 – 60 $

anick cadorette 5 – 60 $

keith nelson       7 – 80 $

valerie bedard    7 – 80 $

jean francois bouchard 9 – 120 $

stephen scobie 9 – 120 $

steve gelinas     9 – 120 $

daniel sumun     9 – 120 $

jerry leblanc       13 – 160 $

The Pool Scene - Henrik Larsson, Jennifer Barretta, Vilmos Foldes - World Pool Billiard

New Post on http://thepoolscene.com/?p=21356

LARSSON LEAVES LITTLE DOUBT

Wheelchair world champ shines along with Brits, Filipinos and Finns on a tough Day 1 at  the World Pool Series in New York.  

4-time World 9-ball Wheelchair Champion Henrik Larsson of Sweden advanced to the final 64 at the Molinair Players Championship in New York.

By Ted LernerWPS Media Officer

Photos By JP Parmentier/WPS

(New York City)–England’s Darren Appleton promised his fellow players that his new World Pool Series would give the players exactly what they’ve always wanted; a players’ centered tour with rules and a setup designed to test the world’s best pool players to the limits of their skills.

If the results of Day 1 of the tour’s first event, the Molinari Players Championship, are any indication, that promise has already been fulfilled.

Long races, pockets at a stingy 4.25 inches, breaking outside the center box, having to “take what you make” on the break, 3-foul rule, shootouts on hill-hill matches, and single elimination; these tweaks to traditional 8-ball rules all came together Saturday to prove that the world’s most popular cue game can truly be a hardcore test of pool.

  The USA’s Jennifer Baretta was one of two women players to win their matches against the men in New York today.

In a long grind of a day at New York’s famed Steinway Billiards in Queens that began at 10am and ended past midnight, 56 matches were completed with nearly the half the field already being shown the exit into the cold New York night.(8 top seeded players received byes.) The field is now down to the last 64.

With some matches taking over three hours to complete, it’s clear that stamina and patience will be of utmost importance. So will talent. Don’t expect any pretenders to make a claim on the $20,000 first prize to be handed out on Tuesday night.

It’s perform or take a hike, and even then there’s no guarantee, as American pool great Johnny Archer found out.  Archer and Finland’s unheralded Kim Laaksonen engaged in a back and forth battle, until the Finn pulled away at the end for a hard fought 13-11 win.

Laaksonen’s win wasn’t the only good news for Finland today and bad news for the USA. Petri Makkonen took down the USA’s Mike Dechaine by an identical score line. Both Finns move on while both highly regarded Americans are out.

Another Finnish player also advanced this time in dramatic fashion. Matti Väyrynen’s match with Frenchman Pierre Palmieri went to 12-12, and the two engaged in a thrilling shootout, will both potting pressure packed spot shots on the 8-ball until the Finn came out on top.

With a large field of Americans it certainly wasn’t all doom and gloom for the USA. Rodney Morris, Earl Strickland, Jeremy Jones, Max Eberle, Shaun Wilkie, Raphael Debreo and Jennifer Barretta all advanced.

Barretta was one of four women players entered into the field and one of two to make it through, along with Norway’s Line Kjorsvik.

  Hungary’s Vilmos Foldes emerged victorious after a tough slog against the Philippines Francisco Bustamante.

Appleton’s idea is to showcase the very best talent from all facets of the game, and this led to several wheelchair players being entered into the field, perhaps a first for professional pool. In what will surely be one of the feel good stories of year, Sweden’s Henrik Larsson, a four time WPA World 9-ball Champion wheelchair player, defeated able bodied Canadian Eric Horlfieson 13-9 to advance to the final 64. Larsson, who once had a run of 97 balls in straight pool, is a marvel to watch up close as he exhibits top tier position play and a super confident demeanor.

Fans looking for betting angles might want to pay attention to the British contingent over the next few days. The British lads, most of whom first cut their cue playing chops playing English 8-ball, put in solid performances today. 2010 World 8-ball Champion Karl Boyes handily defeated Ireland’s Sean Hoey, 13-3. 2-time English 8-ball world champion Chris Melling made a solid return to American pool with a 13-8 win over France’s Vincent Faquet. Imran Majid and Mark Gray all pulled through nicely. With Appleton and white hot Jayson Shaw getting byes, the Brits are almost sure to go deep into the championship.

The always strong Filipino contingent performed well today. Dennis Orcollo, Johan Chua, Lee Vann Corteza, Israel Rota and veteran Ramil Gallego all advanced with solid wins. The only Filipino of note to stumble was Hall of Famer Francisco Bustamante. Bustamante lost a hard fought slog with Hungary’s Vilmos Foldes, 13-11.

Play continues at Steinway Billiards on Sunday beginning at 10am Eastern Time(GMT -5) with the round of 64 and 32. The last 16 and quarterfinals will be played on Monday. The semi-final and final will be held on Tuesday.

*The first event of the World Pool Series, The Molinari Players Championship, takes place at Steinway Billiards in Astoria, Queens, New York City from January 14-17, 2017. The World Pool Series is sponsored by Molinari, Predator, Cheqio, RYO Rack, Aramith, Iwan Simonis, Kamui, Billiards Digest, Ultimate Team Gear, and High Rock.

For more information on the live stream, please visit the official website of the World Pool Series at http://www.worldpoolseries.com/Complete online brackets and live scoring can be found here:  https://cuescore.com/tournament/WPS+1st+series+-+Molinari+Players+Championship/1286018

The World Pool Series is on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/worldpoolseries/

Steinway Billiards