Tumgik
#apg melbourne
apgadelaide · 4 months
Text
😟 Is your Student Visa (Subclass 500) about to expire? Don't panic! We are here to assist you. 💪
✨ At Asia Pacific Group, our team of visa experts are ready to guide you through the process of extending your visa smoothly and hassle-free. 📝
🌟 Don't delay! Reach out to us today for a seamless visa extension experience. 🌐✅
🚩 Asia Pacific Group Adelaide 🔹 Level 4, 28 Grenfell Street, Adelaide 📱 08 7160 3110 📧 [email protected] https://www.asiapacificgroup.com/book-counselor-adelaide
0 notes
mehmetkali · 1 year
Text
0 notes
apuesta8 · 6 years
Text
View pick 20 July 2018, 10:00 UTC Basketball - Australia: Mount Gambier Pioneers - Melbourne Tigers pick: Mount Gambier Pioneers -8.5 (Point Spread); stake: 2/10 ; odds: 1.830; Bet365 Tigers without best player away with Sydney Kings in China (25ppg, 7,5rpg, 4,6 apg). Noth…
0 notes
singrep-blog · 7 years
Text
Singapore real-estate investors shining on global stage
Singaporean investors now collectively own the largest pool of foreign real estate assets among Asian investors. Their cross-border capital is still flowing abroad even as new trading routes and opportunities have emerged.
Singaporean cross-border investors now own 3,290 properties around the world, going by holdings data from Real Capital Analytics (RCA) as at Oct 2. This pool of assets is the largest of any Asian buyer group, followed by mainland Chinese investors.
Industrial assets in the US comprise the largest share, with close to 1,300 properties, followed by offices and industrial buildings in Australia and shopping malls in China.
As well as core assets in gateway markets, these investors hold student housing and manufactured homes. Geographically, their holdings are more varied than those of their fellow Asian investors, as they have explored opportunities in central and eastern Europe, Ireland and Spain.
Singapore’s presence on the global scene pre-dates the global financial crisis, and capital exports have intensified after the credit crunch.
The reasons have been straightforward: A competitive domestic market to which they are overexposed, a deepening pool of domestic wealth and the opportunity to borrow at low interest.
Capital outflows have, on average, doubled each year since 2009, with US$106.5 billion having been shifted to offshore real estate since then.
In the year to date, cross-border activity has accelerated; outflows from Singapore rose 17 per cent in the first half of this year against a year ago and a total of US$7.8 billion was exported.
US offices alone attracted 27 per cent of all capital outflows in deals, including the partial buyout of the Deutsche Bank headquarters in Manhattan, and the Lafayette Centre in Washington.
Resourceful investors
Singaporean buyers, however, are not only well-travelled but also resourceful investors, often emerging with new strategies and investment angles.
In the aftermath of the global financial crisis – when investment risks were at their highest – China’s real estate appealed to Singaporean investors as the country accelerated its shift towards a consumer driven economy.
In 2010 and 2011, China was a key recipient of cross-border flows from Singapore. The buying spree started with CapitaLand’s acquisition of Orient Overseas Developments’ mixed portfolio for US$2.2 billion.
Then in 2012, Singaporean investors looked to diversify to stable, core properties in Australia, the UK and Japan. Sydney, Melbourne, London and Tokyo emerged as the destinations of choice. In these cities alone, Singaporean investors have represented 30 per cent of Asian cross-border capital since 2012. While Australian and Japanese cities remain key targets, UK volumes have dropped notably, since the Brexit vote to leave the European Union.
In 2015, the focus shifted to logistics to tap into the e-commerce boom. Singaporean investors now collectively own just over 1,800 industrial and logistics properties, the largest share of their foreign assets (based on number of properties).
The most notable industrial deal took place in February 2015, when GIC, the country’s sovereign wealth fund, in a joint venture with Global Logistic Properties bought IndCor’s 576 assets in the US for US$8.1 billion. Moreover, GIC took over the P3 Pointpark portfolio of 62 assets and land located mainly in central and eastern Europe last November.
Last year, they pivoted to invest in residential property and its niche alternatives.
Student housing
Driven by a rapid increase in student populations demanding better-quality accommodation, Singapore investors bought into student housing in the UK and US. In this segment alone, they spent US$5 billion between the start of last year and Q2 2017.
Another niche residential acquisition took place when GIC took a stake in US housing developer and operator YES! Communities’ three portfolios of manufactured homes.
The push for residential property is continuing into this year, particularly in the US. Notably, Monogram’s residential portfolio is reported to have been sold for US$3 billion to a new fund led by Greystar Real Estate Partners, called Greystar Growth and Income Fund LP, which received additional capital from affiliates of Dutch pension capital investor APG Asset Management NV, Singapore’s GIC and Canadian real estate investor Ivanhoe Cambridge.
The second wave of outbound investments to China has crystallised in the last 12 months. Singaporean investors have not shied from development risk; almost 80 per cent of the 60 Singaporean investors active in China bought land for development. The volume tripled in the last 12 months and a total US$6.4 billion was invested in China. The most notable transactions are GIC’s acquisition of Joy City mixed-use portfolio for US$2.8 billion, and Alpha Investment Partners joint venture with KeppelCapital and Allianz to buy the Soho Hongkou mixed-used project for US$525 million.
Singaporean investors continue to explore new opportunities to export capital. In fully-priced markets where property yields could compress further, they still aim to ramp up their overseas holdings. Next to traditional offices and retail, they focused on investment opportunities in logistics and alternative-asset classes such as student housing and manufactured homes.
The drivers for Singapore capital to invest abroad will still be there from hereon, but investors will face a competitive environment and require new strategies to deploy capital efficiently.
Adapted from: The Business Times, 5 October 2017
0 notes
swimsharks-blog · 7 years
Text
Singapore real-estate investors shining on global stage
Singaporean investors now collectively own the largest pool of foreign real estate assets among Asian investors. Their cross-border capital is still flowing abroad even as new trading routes and opportunities have emerged.
Singaporean cross-border investors now own 3,290 properties around the world, going by holdings data from Real Capital Analytics (RCA) as at Oct 2. This pool of assets is the largest of any Asian buyer group, followed by mainland Chinese investors.
Industrial assets in the US comprise the largest share, with close to 1,300 properties, followed by offices and industrial buildings in Australia and shopping malls in China.
As well as core assets in gateway markets, these investors hold student housing and manufactured homes. Geographically, their holdings are more varied than those of their fellow Asian investors, as they have explored opportunities in central and eastern Europe, Ireland and Spain.
Singapore’s presence on the global scene pre-dates the global financial crisis, and capital exports have intensified after the credit crunch.
The reasons have been straightforward: A competitive domestic market to which they are overexposed, a deepening pool of domestic wealth and the opportunity to borrow at low interest.
Capital outflows have, on average, doubled each year since 2009, with US$106.5 billion having been shifted to offshore real estate since then.
In the year to date, cross-border activity has accelerated; outflows from Singapore rose 17 per cent in the first half of this year against a year ago and a total of US$7.8 billion was exported.
US offices alone attracted 27 per cent of all capital outflows in deals, including the partial buyout of the Deutsche Bank headquarters in Manhattan, and the Lafayette Centre in Washington.
Resourceful investors
Singaporean buyers, however, are not only well-travelled but also resourceful investors, often emerging with new strategies and investment angles.
In the aftermath of the global financial crisis – when investment risks were at their highest – China’s real estate appealed to Singaporean investors as the country accelerated its shift towards a consumer driven economy.
In 2010 and 2011, China was a key recipient of cross-border flows from Singapore. The buying spree started with CapitaLand’s acquisition of Orient Overseas Developments’ mixed portfolio for US$2.2 billion.
Then in 2012, Singaporean investors looked to diversify to stable, core properties in Australia, the UK and Japan. Sydney, Melbourne, London and Tokyo emerged as the destinations of choice. In these cities alone, Singaporean investors have represented 30 per cent of Asian cross-border capital since 2012. While Australian and Japanese cities remain key targets, UK volumes have dropped notably, since the Brexit vote to leave the European Union.
In 2015, the focus shifted to logistics to tap into the e-commerce boom. Singaporean investors now collectively own just over 1,800 industrial and logistics properties, the largest share of their foreign assets (based on number of properties).
The most notable industrial deal took place in February 2015, when GIC, the country’s sovereign wealth fund, in a joint venture with Global Logistic Properties bought IndCor’s 576 assets in the US for US$8.1 billion. Moreover, GIC took over the P3 Pointpark portfolio of 62 assets and land located mainly in central and eastern Europe last November.
Last year, they pivoted to invest in residential property and its niche alternatives.
Student housing
Driven by a rapid increase in student populations demanding better-quality accommodation, Singapore investors bought into student housing in the UK and US. In this segment alone, they spent US$5 billion between the start of last year and Q2 2017.
Another niche residential acquisition took place when GIC took a stake in US housing developer and operator YES! Communities’ three portfolios of manufactured homes.
The push for residential property is continuing into this year, particularly in the US. Notably, Monogram’s residential portfolio is reported to have been sold for US$3 billion to a new fund led by Greystar Real Estate Partners, called Greystar Growth and Income Fund LP, which received additional capital from affiliates of Dutch pension capital investor APG Asset Management NV, Singapore’s GIC and Canadian real estate investor Ivanhoe Cambridge.
The second wave of outbound investments to China has crystallised in the last 12 months. Singaporean investors have not shied from development risk; almost 80 per cent of the 60 Singaporean investors active in China bought land for development. The volume tripled in the last 12 months and a total US$6.4 billion was invested in China. The most notable transactions are GIC’s acquisition of Joy City mixed-use portfolio for US$2.8 billion, and Alpha Investment Partners joint venture with KeppelCapital and Allianz to buy the Soho Hongkou mixed-used project for US$525 million.
Singaporean investors continue to explore new opportunities to export capital. In fully-priced markets where property yields could compress further, they still aim to ramp up their overseas holdings. Next to traditional offices and retail, they focused on investment opportunities in logistics and alternative-asset classes such as student housing and manufactured homes.
The drivers for Singapore capital to invest abroad will still be there from hereon, but investors will face a competitive environment and require new strategies to deploy capital efficiently.
Adapted from: The Business Times, 5 October 2017
0 notes
dawyneparson-blog · 7 years
Text
Singapore real-estate investors shining on global stage
Singaporean investors now collectively own the largest pool of foreign real estate assets among Asian investors. Their cross-border capital is still flowing abroad even as new trading routes and opportunities have emerged.
Singaporean cross-border investors now own 3,290 properties around the world, going by holdings data from Real Capital Analytics (RCA) as at Oct 2. This pool of assets is the largest of any Asian buyer group, followed by mainland Chinese investors.
Industrial assets in the US comprise the largest share, with close to 1,300 properties, followed by offices and industrial buildings in Australia and shopping malls in China.
As well as core assets in gateway markets, these investors hold student housing and manufactured homes. Geographically, their holdings are more varied than those of their fellow Asian investors, as they have explored opportunities in central and eastern Europe, Ireland and Spain.
Singapore’s presence on the global scene pre-dates the global financial crisis, and capital exports have intensified after the credit crunch.
The reasons have been straightforward: A competitive domestic market to which they are overexposed, a deepening pool of domestic wealth and the opportunity to borrow at low interest.
Capital outflows have, on average, doubled each year since 2009, with US$106.5 billion having been shifted to offshore real estate since then.
In the year to date, cross-border activity has accelerated; outflows from Singapore rose 17 per cent in the first half of this year against a year ago and a total of US$7.8 billion was exported.
US offices alone attracted 27 per cent of all capital outflows in deals, including the partial buyout of the Deutsche Bank headquarters in Manhattan, and the Lafayette Centre in Washington.
Resourceful investors
Singaporean buyers, however, are not only well-travelled but also resourceful investors, often emerging with new strategies and investment angles.
In the aftermath of the global financial crisis – when investment risks were at their highest – China’s real estate appealed to Singaporean investors as the country accelerated its shift towards a consumer driven economy.
In 2010 and 2011, China was a key recipient of cross-border flows from Singapore. The buying spree started with CapitaLand’s acquisition of Orient Overseas Developments’ mixed portfolio for US$2.2 billion.
Then in 2012, Singaporean investors looked to diversify to stable, core properties in Australia, the UK and Japan. Sydney, Melbourne, London and Tokyo emerged as the destinations of choice. In these cities alone, Singaporean investors have represented 30 per cent of Asian cross-border capital since 2012. While Australian and Japanese cities remain key targets, UK volumes have dropped notably, since the Brexit vote to leave the European Union.
In 2015, the focus shifted to logistics to tap into the e-commerce boom. Singaporean investors now collectively own just over 1,800 industrial and logistics properties, the largest share of their foreign assets (based on number of properties).
The most notable industrial deal took place in February 2015, when GIC, the country’s sovereign wealth fund, in a joint venture with Global Logistic Properties bought IndCor’s 576 assets in the US for US$8.1 billion. Moreover, GIC took over the P3 Pointpark portfolio of 62 assets and land located mainly in central and eastern Europe last November.
Last year, they pivoted to invest in residential property and its niche alternatives.
Student housing
Driven by a rapid increase in student populations demanding better-quality accommodation, Singapore investors bought into student housing in the UK and US. In this segment alone, they spent US$5 billion between the start of last year and Q2 2017.
Another niche residential acquisition took place when GIC took a stake in US housing developer and operator YES! Communities’ three portfolios of manufactured homes.
The push for residential property is continuing into this year, particularly in the US. Notably, Monogram’s residential portfolio is reported to have been sold for US$3 billion to a new fund led by Greystar Real Estate Partners, called Greystar Growth and Income Fund LP, which received additional capital from affiliates of Dutch pension capital investor APG Asset Management NV, Singapore’s GIC and Canadian real estate investor Ivanhoe Cambridge.
The second wave of outbound investments to China has crystallised in the last 12 months. Singaporean investors have not shied from development risk; almost 80 per cent of the 60 Singaporean investors active in China bought land for development. The volume tripled in the last 12 months and a total US$6.4 billion was invested in China. The most notable transactions are GIC’s acquisition of Joy City mixed-use portfolio for US$2.8 billion, and Alpha Investment Partners joint venture with KeppelCapital and Allianz to buy the Soho Hongkou mixed-used project for US$525 million.
Singaporean investors continue to explore new opportunities to export capital. In fully-priced markets where property yields could compress further, they still aim to ramp up their overseas holdings. Next to traditional offices and retail, they focused on investment opportunities in logistics and alternative-asset classes such as student housing and manufactured homes.
The drivers for Singapore capital to invest abroad will still be there from hereon, but investors will face a competitive environment and require new strategies to deploy capital efficiently.
Adapted from: The Business Times, 5 October 2017
0 notes
tonyzekeau · 7 years
Text
Dear ghost home owner: prepare to be hit with more tax – The Sydney Morning Herald
September 22 2017 – 11:46AM
Emily Cadman
208 reading now
On a wet, midweek evening when most Australians are home cooking dinner, less than a third of the lights are on in the apartments in Melbourne’s Docklands. Most shops and restaurants are closed. The only people passing through seem to be on their way elsewhere.
These “ghost towers”, as the high-end residential property with three-bedroom apartments costing almost $1 million have been dubbed, are popular with Chinese investors who mostly live abroad.
Play Video Don’t Play
Up Next
Will the commodity carnage continue?
Play Video Don’t Play
Video duration
03:04
More BusinessDay Videos
Previous slide Next slide
House price growth ‘to halve’
An oversupply of apartments and the taxation of foreign buyers will restrict growth in house prices in Sydney and Melbourne, says HSBC economist.
Their darkened blocks loom as sparsely occupied symbols of a property market where even solidly middle class households have increasingly found themselves priced out.
Now, policy makers are seizing on public resentment and hitting foreign buyers with more taxes.
An analysis of Australian census data by the City Futures Research Centre found more than one in 10 homes unoccupied on the night of the count last year. Photo: Jamie Davies
NSW has doubled its surcharge when foreigners purchase residential property, and Western Australia has added a new tax as well.
More controversially, both the conservative federal government and the left-leaning one in Victoria this year imposed additional taxes on properties deemed to be empty for six months or more.
Figuring out if a home is vacant is a vexing subject for public officials.
You will now receive updates from Business AM Newsletter
Business AM Newsletter
Get the latest news and updates emailed straight to your inbox.
Those in Victoria have said they plan to ask owners to self-declare, and also intend to monitor electricity and water usage to find cheaters.
Foreigners, mainly from China, purchased 25 per cent and 16 per cent of the new housing supply in NSW and Victoria, respectively, in the year through September 2016. 
The Australian Taxation Office suggests the government investigate tips from informants. Other potential sources could include postal data or tax returns, said Catherine Cashmore, president of land tax reform group Prosper.
Switches, taps
But real estate professionals say it’s easy enough to hire someone to come in and turn on switches and taps, making a place appear lived-in.
Agents say many properties are only temporarily empty, waiting for children to attend university or a family member to be able to move in. They also raise questions of fairness.
“What next?” said Monika Tu, the Sydney-based director of Black Diamondz, which specialises in high end property sales to mainly Chinese buyers. “Shall we tax people who buy new shoes and don’t wear them?”
Australia’s moves are part of a growing global trend, primarily in response to the massive amounts of capital that have poured out of China and into real estate around the world. Additional taxes targeting vacant homes are already in place in Vancouver and some London boroughs, with Toronto and Dublin mulling similar moves.
In Vancouver, officials have used social media to blast the public with reminders that secondary residences be occupied at least six months of the year or else they’ll be subject to the tax, and that they must file declarations in December to determine it. Violators can incur fines of as much as $C10,000 a day.
An analysis of Australian census data by the City Futures Research Centre found more than one in 10 homes unoccupied on the night of the count last year, with empty properties having risen 19 per cent in Melbourne and 15 per cent in Sydney since the last census five years previously.
Foreigners, mainly from China, purchased 25 per cent and 16 per cent of the new housing supply in NSW and Victoria, respectively, in the year through September 2016, according to a Credit Suisse Group examination of state tax receipts.
Melbourne’s tax of 1 per cent of an empty home’s value takes effect in January, adding to a nationwide tax imposed in May that starts at $5500 and scales sharply upward for properties worth more than $1 million.
Prices doubled
The median price for a home in Sydney has doubled since 2009, according to data tracker CoreLogic.
More than 60 per cent of Sydney residents blame foreign investment for the rising prices, according to a survey by University of Sydney academic Dallas Rogers.
The idea of taking prime real estate out of the housing supply and leaving it vacant has become a focus of anger as homelessness has risen and hundreds of people have been camping in the rough out outside places like the Reserve Bank of Australia.
“It’s just absurd,” said Tony Keenan, chief executive of affordability advocacy group Launch Housing, referring to the fact that Australia’s long period of uninterrupted growth should have ensured homes for everyone instead of “record levels of homeless and massive construction with empty properties at the end”.
For wealthy Chinese investors, more taxes may be just another cost to take into account.
With a two-bedroom apartment in Sydney and Melbourne costing 25 per cent less than in Shanghai, according to Credit Suisse, Chinese have found Australia to be among the world’s attractive places to park cash as their home currency was declining and as they sought to diversify wealth overseas.
Leor Wong, a director of Melbourne-based Australia Property Group Investment (APG), who has been selling Australian properties to Chinese investors for 11 years, cites one friend who leaves his $1 million holiday apartment empty, apart from a month or so a year when he visits with family and friends.
“I don’t think he’d mind this tax,” Wong said.
But Liu Yumei, a 52-year-old restaurant owner in Suzhou, China, is rethinking her plans.
Her $290,000, two-bedroom Melbourne apartment has been empty since 2013, other than for a brief family holiday.
Citing the risk of it getting “messy and old”, Liu said fears about damage stopped her from renting out the apartment, which was bought in anticipation of her son eventually living there during his university years.
The new vacancy tax for her unit would exceed $2200 a year – enough to cause her to look into renters or AirBnB.
“Some friends are educating me that rental income could be high in Australia and I shouldn’t miss it,” said Liu, who has friends in Melbourne to help with arranging AirBnB stays.
Little blame?
But despite public sentiment to the contrary, it’s unclear how much foreign buying contributes to rising property prices.
A recent government paper concluded foreign money can be blamed for no more than $122 of a quarterly price increase of $12,800 over the five-year period it studied.
Tighter capital controls in China, along with Australian banks’ decision to stop lending to offshore buyers combined with the effect of the stamp duties and other taxes may also soon start to bite – if they haven’t already.
Wong says revenue from property sales has fallen 60 per cent over the past year, and that APG has quadrupled its rental business to bridge the gap, including from the Docklands.
“You have to go defensive,” Wong said. “Right now rental business is something brokers have to pound on.”
Bloomberg
Follow BusinessDay
Source: https://highpowerclean.com.au/dear-ghost-home-owner-prepare-to-be-hit-with-more-tax-the-sydney-morning-herald/
from High Power Cleaning Melbourne https://highpowercleanau.wordpress.com/2017/09/22/dear-ghost-home-owner-prepare-to-be-hit-with-more-tax-the-sydney-morning-herald/
0 notes
botanytoo · 7 years
Text
Here in Shenzhen, I’ve learnt about nearly every aspect of botany, and in this overview, I will consider where are the paradigm shifts I’ll be telling people about. Often, the ‘big issue’ is obvious right from the beginning of a conference: my blog posts from previous conferences try to bring out my own message from a meeting. But what is it here? The need for the greening of cities with plants; every species is amenable to genomic analysis and there are no longer orphans; big-data analysis answering real questions; polyploidy and whole genome duplication as the major force shaping plant genome evolution; new applications of robotics, phenotyping, new genetics and automation in agriculture? Perhaps it needs reflection for a few weeks to synthesise what I’ve heard, but all these are things I will be discussing with my lab and more widely. The new papers I’ve heard and my conversations at #IBC2017 will certainly be influencing my research in the next years.
Maybe less positively, several papers and conversations have a rather depressing view that are no solutions to the crises facing the environment, and things are getting worse. The Shenzhen Declaration on Plant Sciences to build a green, sustainable earth and its call for action, is certainly something to take home and live by, even if there is a little too much fatherhood-and-apple-pie or armchair-and-slippers (not that I have much time for any of these). And as I pointed out in my first IBC2017 blog, it misses the critical teaching and education about plants that we need to teach, inspire and support the next generation to do better things than us.
#gallery-0-10 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-10 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 33%; } #gallery-0-10 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-10 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
Looking back, I find it easy to remember the shifts in botany which have been marked by most previous Congresses. I’ve been going to IBCs through most of the Anthropocene – this is my sixth. In Berlin (1987), I recognized the extraordinary detrimental effect that people are having on the planet. Up to then, most changes were reversible and small-scale, but the huge and unsustainable resource use by people was then coming clear, not least in a talk I well remember from Peter Raven. Sadly, these warnings are still needed, and Peter presented the inspirational opening lecture here in Shenzhen, 30 years later showing how undervaluing plants and the environment is leading the challenges we face.
Tokyo in 1993 partly marked the start of thinking deeply about DNA sequences and genes in a new and experimentally tractable and approachable manner, but most importantly, I think it recognized for the first time a truly global community of plant scientists. It was the first IBC to be held outside Europe or North America (plus Sydney in 1981). Since then, botanists from across the world have worked together in partnerships ever more closely, and we expect our labs and fieldwork to always involve partners from multiple continents.
At St Louis in 1999, it became clear to me for the first time that phylogeny would be ‘solved’ by molecular genetics methods. There were major surprises emerging at that time, not least the separation of basal angiosperms (Amborella and Nuphar) being sister to all other angiosperms. Following that recognition, all plant families are robustly separated and contribute to a phylogeny with exclusively monophyletic origin. St Louis was soon after APG I (the first paper of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group, 1998, which reduced the number of plant orders to 40, one fifth of previous estimates, but had minimal resolution of relationships). Tidying of is still going on of course, particularly outside the flowering plants, and the role of hybridity, whole genome duplication, and polyploidy is not yet understood.
Melbourne in 2011 perhaps was the first conference where the impact of the internet on botany was becoming clear – whether from databases and web-based information resources, or even social media (it was a very early exposure of the then-new AoBBlog – see Day 1 IBC18 report). Electronic publication of new plant names was one of the allowed by a vote of the conference (as discussed in my second blog report) albeit with still problems in the definition: at Annals of Botany, our few naming papers are still held back and do not appear on-line before print publication. Here in Shenzhen, the progress to internet resources continues: Peter Wyse Jackson released the “An on-line flora of all known plants”. Accessibility improvements and the emphasis on improved and interoperable web platforms is notable at all the publisher’s stands too here.
#gallery-0-11 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-11 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 33%; } #gallery-0-11 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-11 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
The stunning organization of the conference as put on by our hosts and the city of Shenzhen is clear for everyone to see: 7000 people efficiently organized, no glitches from the projection and minimal from the sound, plenty of space and water provided everywhere. But it is interesting to see the multiple attitudes of Westerners to China. I seem to recognize four distinct groups with equal numbers: 25% are scared stiff (“throw away your contaminated USB stick” was a quote I heard); 25% treat everything as perfectly normal; 25% are astonished at every turn; and 25% accept what-turns-up, turns-up and go along with the flow. I’ll admit to being solidly in the latter camp. Sweet, sour, or sweet-and-sour is only the start of it. A fully kitted riot team with shields, long-arm truncheons, and more, marching through the conference hall; part of a day at a botany meeting. Ready for bed after wining (well, Mao Tai-ing) and dining?; well, then it’s time for a boat trip on an illuminated river. The answer to ‘what type of electricity socket is there?’ is an emphatic ‘Yes’: they differ completely even between rooms in one hotel! Not allowed to take a water bottle from one part of the conference to another?; obviously a security risk. Are green-walls the most popular thing to make your venue cool?; plants are a nuisance to water and prune, so let’s have a wall made of plastic plants.
There are not so many remnants of the ‘old China’ to be seen that I remember from my first trips. Then, Shenzhen was a town with a population of 30,000; now it is 30,000,000! But there are a few. As well as a number plate, all trucks and buses used to have a crudely stencilled huge number on the back, although the crudeness given the ‘working’ paint (rust) job, dents, scratches and repairs elsewhere was not obvious. Now, you are in an air-conditioned, seat-belted, glossy, bus which would fit anywhere in the UK, only it includes, next to fancy logos, the number as crudely stencilled as ever on the back.
#gallery-0-12 { margin: auto; } #gallery-0-12 .gallery-item { float: left; margin-top: 10px; text-align: center; width: 33%; } #gallery-0-12 img { border: 2px solid #cfcfcf; } #gallery-0-12 .gallery-caption { margin-left: 0; } /* see gallery_shortcode() in wp-includes/media.php */
So back to the paradigm shifts we’re seeing from IBC2017; I’ve asked around and had support for some without prompting, support for all with prompting (and my ‘four attitudes to China also holds up to audience questioning). The need for the greening of cities with plants is a major topic in talks, exhibition and, clearly, in the city of Shenzhen itself. This is not without a research need – how to ensure plants can provide the ecosystem services of water retention and weather-buffering, and use native flora, without huge maintenance costs and problems of leaves and insects? Not least the presence of BGI as the world’s biggest DNA sequencing organization, and the strong support for plant research coming from their Founder in his public lecture, it is clear that every plant species is amenable to genomic analysis and there are no longer orphans, and this knowledge can be used to explain plant behaviour and responses. Building and using new technologies and big data platforms to increase exploration and understanding of nature is Priority 4 of the Shenzhen Declaration, and several sessions ranging from genetic to global ecology show how millions of data points from dozens of people can answer real questions, whether about forest diversity and tree distribution, or the genetic basis of types of photosynthesis. Although I am biased, having co-edited the latest Annals of Botany Special Issue on “Polyploidy in Ecology and Evolution”, the impact of whole genome duplication and polyploidy as the major force shaping plant genome evolution seems to be pervasive in multiple plenary talks and sessions, whether taxonomic, evolutionary, ecological or crop-oriented. Finally, we can’t feed the 7.5 billion people on the planet now, nor meet the aspirations for a better lifestyle of the 9 billion in 2050 (and that is only 33 harvests away, less time than I have been going to International Botanical Congresses) with the unsustainable approaches to agriculture – growing plants and removing energy for our own human needs. We are seeing and hearing here at IBC2017 how the trajectory to destruction can be changed through the exploitation of genetics and biodiversity, combined with new applications of robotics, phenotyping, automation, disease control, nutrition and water usage, all based on plant science and research.
International Botanical Congress #IBC2017 and the big picture from Shenzhen Here in Shenzhen, I’ve learnt about nearly every aspect of botany, and in this overview, I will consider where are the paradigm shifts I’ll be telling people about.
0 notes
workreveal-blog · 7 years
Text
Foreign Property Investment Stats
New Post has been published on https://workreveal.biz/foreign-property-investment-stats/
Foreign Property Investment Stats
Walking alongside Cannes’s famous Croisette remaining week, you can be forgiven for wondering whether you had stumbled into the annual holiday for the United Kingdom visitor board. Always look for best investment opportunities.
Tents emblazoned with “Manchester,” “The Midlands,” “Belfast” and “Newcastle” coated the street, humming with activity inside.
But this changed into no longer a gathering of England’s tourism chiefs – the stands have been at Mipim, the annual meeting of the commercial belongings industry within the south of France. And the nearby government have been there to attract investors as an investment within the public quarter becomes more and tighter.
And the investors are coming. Research from Savills visible completely with the aid of The Sunday Telegraph indicates that Center and A long way Japanese buyers have been particularly active in the remaining 12 months, almost doubling the quantity of money they have got spent in the United kingdom’s nearby markets in 2016 to around £1.9bn. In general, overseas buyers accounted for nearly one-third of all investment that befell inside Britain nearby commercial assets marketplace closing yr. In Edinburgh, they made up 80pc of all of 2016’s spending on industrial belongings.
James Gulliford and Richard Merryweather, who together lead Savills’ Uk investment crew, say the trend is about to preserve.
Gulliford explains that United Kingdom investment makes the experience for plenty distant places customers because of its criminal machine and regulated market. Look for investment opportunities.
“On the pinnacle of this, the sterling devaluation has made pricing attractive for traders whose foreign money is pegged to America dollar,” he says. “There has also been a brief absence of Uk institutional customers which has created a touch less competitive marketplace.”
foreign property investment
As fees increase in London, traders might also consider an appearance also afield to find the higher cost, provides Merryweather.
“We’re seeing the primary symptoms of foreign shoppers searching at markets along with Bracknell and Portsmouth that offer a greater yield in comparison to the traditional hubs of Birmingham and Manchester,” he explains.
There’s regularly higher value to be located in homes outside London, in which a distinctly untapped belongings market can yield stronger returns because the cost of homes is rather lots decrease than the capital, even as rents are still at a reasonable level.
“We discover London difficult from a pricing point of view,” explains Rob Wilkinson, leader government of Paris-based total asset control firm AEW Europe, “while inside the areas, the pricing is not as acute and the occupational side is quite right in most town centers.”
One in all the largest deals finished remaining yr turned into the purchase of Green Park, a massive office park simply outdoor Studying that’s domestic to German pharmaceutical Bayer and housebuilder Berkeley Homes. It becomes offered through Singapore-based investor Mapletree last year for £563m from Canadian investors Oxford Properties, which also these days bought its stake within the Cheesegrater tower, also referred to as 20 Fenchurch Road, London.
Paul Brundage, Oxford Homes’ leader executive, who is additionally the vice chairman of the British property Federation, says that despite the fact that the Brexit vote may have dampened enthusiasm for the United Kingdom,
in short, it remains an attractive vicinity to place cash.
“the UK was one of the preferred markets, and that’s nonetheless the case these days, no matter what we’re experiencing at the political the front,” he says. “That’s now not to mention there isn’t problem – and the final results of the negotiations with the EU Union will be substantial.” Elsewhere, Liverpool One shopping center turned into offered by way of Abu Dhabi Investments for around £300m and a prime redevelopment scheme in Edinburgh town center became sold by way of Dutch pension fund APG for a reported £400m. The systems attracted the hobby of buyers because of lower competition than for London belongings and the success businesses that they house.
Tom Warburton, who is responsible for Newcastle’s £450m capital program, explains that funding from outside of the United Kingdom is essential.
“No one is doing speculative building [of offices],” he explains, “so we’ve been doing some of the strategies to deliver non-public capital into the city. Those developments are about the public quarter running with the personal zone. Having already built a scheme with criminal & Popular, we’re eager to locate traders willing to fund different projects including our Stephenson Region development.” The system consists of 5 large new homes in Newcastle metropolis center.
Amongst other things, the Authorities used the conference to release a £7bn funding portfolio for The Midlands, which blanketed searching for a backer for some homes connected to the brand new Excessive Speed 2 rail link.
Birmingham’s new Curzon district, where the brand new HS2 station would be, wishes £500m investment, in step with the Branch of Worldwide Alternate, and people funds ought to properly come from remote places.
Sir John Peace, chairman of the Authorities’ Midlands Engine Challenge, explains that the pass demonstrates ministers’ ambitions for development out of doors London.
foreign property investment
“We’ve got a few just remarkable projects to be had this year; whether it is investments which have been born due to HS2 or smaller tasks to (or “intending to”) delivering real trade, financial growth, and jobs for of our towns,” he says. “The work we’re doing in the area is a clear sign to Global buyers that the UK is open for an enterprise.”
A new penalty regime targeting foreign investors has seen 500 remote places assets consumers issued with death notices and informed to pay the Australian Taxation workplace $2.7m in fines.
Most people of breaches befell in Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and Western Australia. In December 2015 the Federal Government introduced a variety of new penalties for foreign investors, along with new civil consequences supporting divestment orders, fines for 1/3 events who knowingly assisted foreign buyers to interrupt the policies, and prices for foreign investment applications.
The Australian Taxation workplace confirmed on Sunday that in view that then, 500 penalties have been issued for seven hundred offenses, including failing to get foreign investment Overview Board approval earlier than shopping for. penalties had been additionally issued to people who breached a circumstance of formerly authorized programs, for instance brief residents failing to sell their Residences once their visa expired.
The treasurer, Scott Morrison, has additionally permitted the specified sale of 61 foreign-owned Properties, well worth over $107m.
“Additional subjects are currently in contemplation and due for approval quickly,” the Australian Taxation workplace said in an announcement.
Some the breaches arose from traders coming ahead during the decreased penalty length, the assertion said.
Even as figures change regularly as investigations conclude, the present day statistics indicates 60% of overseas buyers investigated had been granted retrospective approvals – where the investor did now not apply for foreign funding Review Board approval earlier than shopping But could in any other case have received support.
But, retrospective permissions granted with strict situations, with breaches of these cases ensuing in civil penalties or criminal prosecution.
Normal, 20% of the Properties and offenses investigated led to a required sale or self-divestment.
Other examples of offenses include temporary resident visa holders investing more than one foreign property; Australian groups controlled via foreigners proudly owning multiple mounted Houses; and failing to commence creation on vacant land or for redevelopments inside limited timeframes.
foreign property investment
The findings are anticipated to be covered inside the foreign funding Evaluation Board annual document, which is due for launch imminently.
A spokeswoman for Morrison advised Father or mother Australia that the Government changed into “devoted to implementing our guidelines so that foreign nationals illegally maintaining Australian belongings are diagnosed and their unlawful holdings relinquished.”
“The Government’s policy to channel overseas investment into new dwellings creates Extra jobs in the production industry, will increase housing supply and helps monetary growth,” he stated. The Coalition has been discussing possible solutions to housing affordability, that’s expected to be relevant to the budget being launched in 5 weeks time.
On Sunday, the immigration minister Peter Dutton advised Sky Information that the Authorities turned into considering encouraging migrant people to settle in regional cities and far away from the belongings warm spots of Sydney and Melbourne.
“There are approaches we are searching at that we is probably capable of offer assist to people to select a nearby city,” he said.
according to international assets firm JLL, the depreciation of the pound, coupled with a mild drop in capital values, has led United kingdom commercial actual property to be discounted via 16% on average by using foreign places money.
  As Theresa may trigger Article 50 to start the procedure of chickening out from the EU, JLL findings highlight that the depreciation has spurred improved investment in the United Kingdom from the Center East and Asia Pacific regions despite the fact that the market has killed much less capital influx from the USA and worldwide budget. Notwithstanding the fact that forex motion shave no longer had a strong historical correlation with Standard Global capital flow into the UK, they’re a part of the motive why the market has skilled a recent surge in demand from consumers from the Center East and the Asia Pacific region, headlined via Hong Kong and mainland China.
Which is the primary development related to Qatar’s web hosting of the 2022 FIFA World Cup? But, with the significant numbers of flats and compounds being built, the improvement of a strata title Law is an issue that the authorities will want to deal with inside the immediate future.
0 notes
drubblernews-blog · 7 years
Photo
Tumblr media
New Post has been published on http://drubbler.com/2017/03/01/australian-air-force-received-the-first-ea-18-g-growler-electronic-warfare/
Australian Air Force received the first EA-18 g Growler ELECTRONIC WARFARE
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();
Canberra, March 1, 2017, 20:29- REGNUM in Australian Melbourne ceremony of transfer of Australian air force first aircraft electronic warfare EA-18 g Growler, according to the portal defense-aerospace.com.
Australian Air Force received the first of a new generation of radio-electronic warfare aircraft. In the international airspace Salon AVALON at the Melbourne ceremony transferring Australian military aviators aircraft EA-18 g Growler, which translated to English means “Fuddy-duddy”.
Military of Australia became the first after Americans, obtaining the newest adopted aircraft electronic warfare EA-18 g Growler. Air machine was created on the basis of the American deck fighter F/A-18 f Super Hornet and externally almost identical battle machine. The difference is in a modified form and external wing pylons with radio-electronic equipment of the newest model.
it is worth noting that “Fuddy-duddy” retains the ability to carry and use missiles and bombs.
in addition, the airplanes E/A-18 g installed radar AN/APG-79 and electronic warfare equipment production of Northrop Grumman Corporation.
recall the Australian military still in 2011 year expressed plans to purchase aircraft ELECTRONIC WARFARE EA-18 g Growler. Australian AIR FORCE command then offered to retool from 24 12 existing Super Hornet fighter aircraft in service, but in 2014, the Ministry of defence has ordered 12 new Boeing aircraft electronic warfare. Delivery of ordered aircraft to Australia should be completed before the year 2020.
If you notice an error in the text, highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter to send information to the editor.
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push();
0 notes
apgadelaide · 5 months
Text
Tumblr media
🌈🏡 At APG, we go above and beyond to help you achieve your long-term goals. We specialize in assisting students in getting admission in their desired course and eventually securing PR in Australia. 🌟💼
🌐 Reach out to us today and let us be your trusted companion on this incredible journey. 🤝
🚩 Asia Pacific Group Sydney 🔹 Suite 1402, 14th Floor, 447 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000 📱 02 7201 8800 📧 [email protected]
🚩 Asia Pacific Group Parramatta 🔹 21 George St, Parramatta NSW 2150 📱 02 7201 8800 📧 [email protected]
🔗 www.asiapacificgroup.com/contact-us
🚩 𝐀𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐚 - Melbourne | Williams Landing | Reservoir | Sydney | Parramatta | Adelaide 🚩 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 - Manila | Nueva Vizcaya | Cebu | Davao | La Union | Tarlac 🚩 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 - Chandigarh (Mohali) 🚩 𝐏𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧 - Lahore 🚩 𝐂𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐚 - Phnom Penh 🚩 𝐊𝐞𝐧𝐲𝐚 - Nairobi
1 note · View note
apgadelaide · 6 months
Text
Tumblr media
🌏✈️ Did you know that becoming a sponsor for your family member's visitor visa application doesn't require an application fee? That's right! It's absolutely free! 😲
👨‍👩‍👧‍👦 But wait, there's more! As a sponsor, you might be ask to pay a security bond between AUD 5,000 to AUD 15,000 per person which must be paid in full before the final decision is made on the visa application. 📝💰
🌏 For more details and expert guidance on the sponsorship process, get in touch with APG today.
🚩 Asia Pacific Group Sydney 🔹 Suite 1402, 14th Floor, 447 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000 📱 02 7201 8800 📧 [email protected]
🚩 Asia Pacific Group Parramatta 🔹 21 George St, Parramatta NSW 2150 📱 02 7201 8800 📧 [email protected]
🔗 www.asiapacificgroup.com/contact-us
🚩 𝐀𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐚 - Melbourne | Sydney | Adelaide | Reservoir | Williams Landing | Parramatta 🚩 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 - Manila | Nueva Vizcaya | Cebu | Davao | La Union | Tarlac 🚩 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 - Chandigarh (Mohali) 🚩 𝐏𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧 - Lahore 🚩 𝐂𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐚 - Phnom Penh
0 notes
apgadelaide · 7 months
Text
Tumblr media
🔍 Seeking a nursing career? The choice between becoming a Registered Nurse (RN) or an Enrolled Nurse (EN) can make a significant impact on your professional journey! Let's explore the distinctions! 📚
🌏 Contact APG now for more detailed information about courses and take the first step towards your dream profession! 🎓
🚩 Asia Pacific Group Sydney 🔹 Suite 1402, 14th Floor, 447 Kent Street, Sydney NSW 2000 📱 02 7201 8800 📧 [email protected]
🔗 www.asiapacificgroup.com/contact-us
🚩 𝐀𝐮𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐚 - Melbourne | Sydney | Adelaide | Reservoir | Williams Landing | Parramatta 🚩 𝐏𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐩𝐩𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 - Manila | Nueva Vizcaya | Cebu | Davao | La Union | Tarlac 🚩 𝐈𝐧𝐝𝐢𝐚 - Chandigarh (Mohali) 🚩 𝐏𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧 - Lahore 🚩 𝐂𝐚𝐦𝐛𝐨𝐝𝐢𝐚 - Phnom Penh
0 notes