#alice kramden | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

thorntonkrell-blog-blog · 1 year

Text

Remember how threatened we were about Sputnik? How thrilled we were about Telstar? Threat and thrill have kinda been left behind as we're accustomed to the services and satelites which aid our addiction to teevee and spying amongst other things.

As of September 2021, there were more than 3,000 satellites in orbit around the Earth. However, this number is constantly changing as new satellites are launched and old ones are decommissioned or re-enter the Earth's atmosphere.The exact number of satellites in orbit can be difficult to determine due to differences in how different organizations define what constitutes a "satellite."

For example, some organizations may only consider objects in orbit that are larger than a certain size or that are in certain orbits, while others may count all objects in orbit regardless of their size or orbit.

The ashes ofTimothy Leary are on board one of them as is the music of Chuck Berry and God only knows what else.

Additionally, some organizations may only count functioning satellites, while others may include non-functional or debris objects as well. Some organizations may distinguish between natural satellites (such as the Moon) and artificial satellites (man-made objects placed in orbit around the Earth), while others may not make this distinction.

If the moon is a satelte, Alice Kramden may also be a satelite and one of the first launched from Brooklyn.

All of these factors can contribute to variations in the number of satellites reported by different organizations. The United States has the largest number of satellites in orbit around the Earth, with over 1,300 satellites. However, it's worth noting that this number includes both government and commercial satellites, as well as those operated by other countries but launched from the United States.

Other countries with significant numbers of satellites in orbit include Russia, China, and European countries such as France and Germany. The exact numbers of satellites belonging to each country can change over time as new satellites are launched and older ones are decommissioned.

Collisions between satellites in orbit are rare, but they can and do happen. With over 3,000 satellites in orbit, the risk of collisions has increased in recent years.

Most satellites are tracked by ground-based radar systems and their orbits are carefully monitored to minimize the risk of collisions. However, there is still a risk of collisions due to factors such as human error, equipment failure, or the proliferation of small satellites that are difficult to track.

When satellites collide, the impact can create a cloud of debris that can pose a risk to other satellites in orbit. This debris can create a cascade effect known as the Kessler Syndrome, where collisions generate even more debris, increasing the risk of further collisions and potentially rendering certain orbits unusable.

To reduce the risk of collisions and mitigate the effects of debris, satellite operators can take steps such as designing satellites to be less likely to produce debris, planning satellite trajectories to avoid other objects in orbit, and developing methods to remove debris from orbit.

Of course the same thing might be said about human behavior if we could avoid aggressive, hostile bullshit, learn to stay in our own lane and clean up the messes we create before someone or something else steps in and fixes our faults before we do (or after.)

There have been several reports of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) or unidentified flying objects (UFOs) in recent years, some of which have been reported by military personnel.

The US government has recently released reports on UAP sightings, and some experts have suggested that these sightings could be due to natural phenomena or human-made objects such as drones or experimental aircraft. However, the nature and origin of these sightings remain unclear, and there is ongoing debate and investigation into the topic.

With all these satellites flying above us, wouldn't it be nice to know that one of them has been sent back from the future to record conditions just before we were forced to space migrate and maybe provide answers for us that would help us avoid our own suicide. Assuming that such a satellite was sent back from the future and was observing events just before space migration saved our species from extinction, it could potentially provide valuable information about the events leading up to the migration and the reasons behind it.

This could include information about the factors that led to the near-extinction event, the decision-making process that led to the decision to migrate to space, and the challenges and successes encountered during the migration. It's also worth noting that the presence of a satellite from the future could potentially have unintended consequences, such as altering the course of events in ways that are difficult to predict. The effects of such interference could be both positive and negative, and would depend on a variety of factors that are difficult to anticipate.

Knowing our specific capacity to ignore and or misunderstand words of wisdom/writings on the wall, we would probably ignore the information labeling it a communist plot and shooting the engineers as well as the messengers.

And then we are gone.

But the earth remains.

If humans were to disappear from the Earth, the planet would undergo significant changes in the short term as human-built infrastructure and systems gradually failed and nature reclaimed the land.

In the absence of human activity, natural ecosystems would begin to regenerate, and wildlife populations could rebound in areas previously dominated by human activity. Forests could reclaim land that was once cleared for agriculture or development, and wildlife populations could expand into areas previously fragmented by roads, buildings, and other human structures.

At the same time, the absence of human activity could have negative effects on certain species that have become dependent on human influence, such as domesticated animals or invasive species that have taken root in human-altered habitats.

I don't think there's gonna be a lot of cows hanging around.

Over longer periods of time, geological processes such as erosion, weathering, and volcanic activity would continue to shape the planet's surface. The Earth's climate would also continue to change over time, influenced by factors such as changes in the amount of solar radiation reaching the planet and fluctuations in atmospheric gases. Even though we're still around, we're getting a glimpse of the weathering process which we try to deny is happening even as we are astonished every day by the bizarre weather patterns that have become "breaking stories" on our national news.

In the very long term, it's possible that new forms of life could evolve to take advantage of the newly available habitats and resources. However, the timescale of such changes would be millions of years, far beyond the reach of human observation or influence. It's difficult to predict which species would be most likely to survive in the absence of humans, as this would depend on a variety of factors such as environmental conditions, competition with other species, and the ability to adapt to changing conditions.

However, some experts suggest that species with generalist traits, such as the ability to thrive in a wide range of environmental conditions and feed on a variety of food sources, may be more likely to survive in the absence of humans. These species may include rodents, some bird species, and certain types of insects.

Maybe the birds will turn back into dinosaurs...dogs into wolves.

Additionally, species that have already shown resilience in the face of human activity, such as those that have adapted to urban environments or that have rebounded from previous declines due to conservation efforts, may also be more likely to survive.

However, it's also worth noting that the absence of humans would create significant ecological changes that could create both opportunities and challenges for various species. Some species may benefit from the disappearance of humans and the changes to the landscape that result, while others may struggle to adapt to the new conditions. Ultimately, the future of different species in a post-human world is difficult to predict and would depend on a complex array of ecological factors.

Lemmings are a species that would likely survive without humans. Lemmings are found in the tundra and other northern habitats and are adapted to survive in harsh environments with cold temperatures and limited resources.

Lemmings have several ecological factors that would help them survive without humans, including:

Adaptability: Lemmings are able to change their behavior and habits in response to environmental changes. For example, they may move to new areas in search of food or to avoid predators such as the wolfpacks and dinosaurs.

Reproductive rate: Lemmings have a high reproductive rate, with females able to produce several litters per year. This allows lemming populations to rebound quickly after a decline and helps ensure the survival of the species.

Predator avoidance: Lemmings are able to avoid predators by living in burrows and tunnels that are difficult for predators to access. They are also known for their ability to quickly detect and avoid potential threats. These attributes were also developing in humans before the migration/extinction as we increasingly sequestered ourselves while watching true life crime shows on teevee which taught us not to trust anyone.

Food availability: Lemmings feed on a variety of plant materials, including grasses, sedges, and shrubs. In the absence of humans, lemmings may be able to find sufficient food sources in their natural habitat.

Habitat availability: Lemmings are adapted to live in tundra and other northern habitats. In the absence of humans, lemmings may be able to expand their range into areas that were previously occupied by human infrastructure.

Overall, while the disappearance of humans may have ecological impacts on some species, it is likely that lemmings would survive and thrive on Earth if they could avoid instances of mass suicide.

All of which leads to the adventures of the first lemmings to occupy the city.

[email protected] How do diffetent organizations define what constitutes a satelite? Different organizations may define what constitutes a "satellite" in slightly different ways, leading to variations in the count of the number of satellites in orbit.

For example, some organizations may only consider objects in orbit that are larger than a certain size or that are in certain orbits, while others may count all objects in orbit regardless of their size or orbit.

Additionally, some organizations may only count functioning satellites, while others may include non-functional or debris objects as well.

Finally, some organizations may distinguish between natural satellites (such as the Moon) and artificial satellites (man-made objects placed in orbit around the Earth), while others may not make this distinction.

All of these factors can contribute to variations in the number of satellites reported by different organizations.

[email protected] How mnay of the 3000 satelites belong to the USA? As of my knowledge cutoff date of September 2021, the United States had the largest number of satellites in orbit around the Earth, with over 1,300 satellites. However, it's worth noting that this number includes both government and commercial satellites, as well as those operated by other countries but launched from the United States.

Other countries with significant numbers of satellites in orbit include Russia, China, and European countries such as France and Germany. The exact numbers of satellites belonging to each country can change over time as new satellites are launched and older ones are decommissioned.

[email protected] Do the satelites collide? Collisions between satellites in orbit are rare, but they can and do happen. With over 3,000 satellites in orbit, the risk of collisions has increased in recent years.

Most satellites are tracked by ground-based radar systems and their orbits are carefully monitored to minimize the risk of collisions. However, there is still a risk of collisions due to factors such as human error, equipment failure, or the proliferation of small satellites that are difficult to track.

When satellites collide, the impact can create a cloud of debris that can pose a risk to other satellites in orbit. This debris can create a cascade effect known as the Kessler Syndrome, where collisions generate even more debris, increasing the risk of further collisions and potentially rendering certain orbits unusable.

To reduce the risk of collisions and mitigate the effects of debris, satellite operators can take steps such as designing satellites to be less likely to produce debris, planning satellite trajectories to avoid other objects in orbit, and developing methods to remove debris from orbit.

[email protected] Is it possible that a satelite is of alien nature? While it is possible that a satellite of extraterrestrial origin exists, there is currently no confirmed evidence of such a satellite in orbit around the Earth.

There have been a few cases where objects have been observed in orbit that were initially thought to be of extraterrestrial origin, but in each case, further investigation revealed that the objects were of human-made or natural origin.

It's also worth noting that the technology required to launch objects into orbit is very advanced and requires a high level of technological sophistication. While it is certainly possible that other intelligent civilizations exist elsewhere in the universe, the likelihood that they would have developed the necessary technology to launch satellites into orbit around Earth is uncertain.

In summary, while the existence of a satellite of extraterrestrial origin is theoretically possible, there is currently no concrete evidence to suggest that such a satellite exists.

[email protected] What were those unidentified objects shot down by US aircraft a few weeks ago I'm sorry, but I do not have information on any specific incidents involving unidentified objects being shot down by US aircraft in the past few weeks.

However, it's worth noting that there have been several reports of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) or unidentified flying objects (UFOs) in recent years, some of which have been reported by military personnel.

The US government has recently released reports on UAP sightings, and some experts have suggested that these sightings could be due to natural phenomena or human-made objects such as drones or experimental aircraft. However, the nature and origin of these sightings remain unclear, and there is ongoing debate and investigation into the topic.

[email protected] Let's imagine that one of the satelites was sent back from the future and is observing what happened just before space migration saved our species from extinction As an AI language model, I can imagine such a scenario, but I should clarify that time travel is currently not possible according to our understanding of physics. Therefore, this scenario is purely hypothetical and cannot be verified by scientific evidence.

Assuming that such a satellite was sent back from the future and was observing events just before space migration saved our species from extinction, it could potentially provide valuable information about the events leading up to the migration and the reasons behind it.

This could include information about the factors that led to the near-extinction event, the decision-making process that led to the decision to migrate to space, and the challenges and successes encountered during the migration.

However, it's also worth noting that the presence of a satellite from the future could potentially have unintended consequences, such as altering the course of events in ways that are difficult to predict. The effects of such interference could be both positive and negative, and would depend on a variety of factors that are difficult to anticipate.

[email protected] Let's imagine the main factor that led to the evacuation of Earth and how that change was facilitated by the satelite from the future As a language model, I can imagine a hypothetical scenario based on your prompt, but it's important to note that time travel is currently not possible according to our understanding of physics, so this is purely a work of fiction.

In this scenario, the satellite from the future may have provided critical information about a previously unknown or underestimated threat to the survival of humanity on Earth. This could be anything from a massive asteroid impact or solar flare to a global pandemic or environmental catastrophe.

The satellite could have provided detailed data and analysis of the threat, allowing scientists and leaders to better understand the magnitude and severity of the danger. This information may have led to a sense of urgency among the world's leaders and the public, spurring them to take more aggressive and coordinated action to address the threat.

Thanks to this information, humanity could have focused its efforts on developing technologies and strategies to mitigate the threat and preserve its species. For example, new technologies may have been developed to detect and deflect asteroids, advanced medical treatments could have been developed to combat pandemics, or new methods of energy production and resource conservation could have been developed to address environmental issues.

The satellite from the future may have also provided guidance on the most effective ways to communicate the danger to the public and the world's leaders, helping to ensure that everyone understood the gravity of the situation and the importance of taking action. This could have facilitated a more unified and coordinated global response, ultimately leading to the successful evacuation of Earth and the preservation of humanity.

[email protected] what would the Earth do in the absence of humans If humans were to disappear from the Earth, the planet would undergo significant changes in the short term as human-built infrastructure and systems gradually failed and nature reclaimed the land.

In the absence of human activity, natural ecosystems would begin to regenerate, and wildlife populations could rebound in areas previously dominated by human activity. Forests could reclaim land that was once cleared for agriculture or development, and wildlife populations could expand into areas previously fragmented by roads, buildings, and other human structures.

At the same time, the absence of human activity could have negative effects on certain species that have become dependent on human influence, such as domesticated animals or invasive species that have taken root in human-altered habitats.

Over longer periods of time, geological processes such as erosion, weathering, and volcanic activity would continue to shape the planet's surface. The Earth's climate would also continue to change over time, influenced by factors such as changes in the amount of solar radiation reaching the planet and fluctuations in atmospheric gases.

In the very long term, it's possible that new forms of life could evolve to take advantage of the newly available habitats and resources. However, the timescale of such changes would be millions of years, far beyond the reach of human observation or influence.

[email protected] Which species would be most likely to survive when the humans are gone It's difficult to predict which species would be most likely to survive in the absence of humans, as this would depend on a variety of factors such as environmental conditions, competition with other species, and the ability to adapt to changing conditions.

However, some experts suggest that species with generalist traits, such as the ability to thrive in a wide range of environmental conditions and feed on a variety of food sources, may be more likely to survive in the absence of humans. These species may include rodents, some bird species, and certain types of insects.

Additionally, species that have already shown resilience in the face of human activity, such as those that have adapted to urban environments or that have rebounded from previous declines due to conservation efforts, may also be more likely to survive.

However, it's also worth noting that the absence of humans would create significant ecological changes that could create both opportunities and challenges for various species. Some species may benefit from the disappearance of humans and the changes to the landscape that result, while others may struggle to adapt to the new conditions. Ultimately, the future of different species in a post-human world is difficult to predict and would depend on a complex array of ecological factors.

[email protected] what are some of the arrays of ecological factors that would enable the survival of rats in the absence of humans There are several ecological factors that could enable the survival of rats in the absence of humans:

Adaptability: Rats are highly adaptable and can thrive in a wide range of environments, from urban areas to rural habitats. They are opportunistic feeders and can eat a variety of food sources, including seeds, insects, fruit, and even carrion.

Reproductive rate: Rats have a high reproductive rate, with females able to produce multiple litters per year. This allows rat populations to rebound quickly after a decline and helps ensure the survival of the species.

Predator avoidance: Rats are able to avoid many predators by living in burrows and tunnels that are difficult for predators to access. They are also known for their ability to quickly detect and avoid potential threats.

Disease resistance: Rats have evolved to live in close proximity to humans and have developed resistance to some of the diseases that affect humans. This could help them survive in areas where other species may be more susceptible to illness.

Habitat availability: The disappearance of humans could create new opportunities for rats to expand into areas that were previously occupied by human infrastructure. For example, rats may be able to colonize abandoned buildings or reclaim land that was previously developed for agriculture or urbanization.

However, it's worth noting that rats can also have negative impacts on ecosystems, particularly in areas where they are invasive species. They can outcompete native species for resources, damage crops, and spread diseases. Ultimately, the long-term impact of rats on ecosystems in the absence of humans is difficult to predict and would depend on a variety of ecological factors.

[email protected] give me some ecological factors that would help rats to survive the disappearance of humans on the planet Some ecological factors that could help rats survive in the absence of humans include:

Availability of food: Rats are opportunistic feeders and can survive on a variety of food sources. In the absence of humans, rats may be able to adapt to new food sources, such as natural plant materials and other animals.

Absence of human control measures: With the disappearance of humans, control measures such as poison baits and traps may no longer be used to manage rat populations. This could allow rat populations to grow unchecked, at least in the short term.

Suitable habitat: Rats are adaptable and can survive in a range of habitats. In the absence of humans, rats may be able to colonize new areas, such as abandoned buildings or natural habitats that were previously occupied by humans.

Resistance to disease: Rats have evolved to live in close proximity to humans and are relatively resistant to some of the diseases that affect humans. This could help them survive in areas where other species may be more susceptible to illness.

Predation: While rats are preyed upon by a range of animals, they are also able to avoid many predators through their ability to live in burrows and tunnels. In the absence of humans, rat populations may be able to rebound quickly after a decline due to predation.

Overall, rats are highly adaptable and resilient, and could potentially thrive in the absence of humans. However, it's worth noting that rats can have negative impacts on ecosystems, particularly in areas where they are invasive species. The long-term impact of rat populations on ecosystems in the absence of humans is difficult to predict and would depend on a variety of ecological factors.

[email protected] Thank you for your help You're welcome! If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.

[email protected] would lemmings survive without humans Yes, lemmings are a species that would likely survive without humans. Lemmings are found in the tundra and other northern habitats and are adapted to survive in harsh environments with cold temperatures and limited resources.

Lemmings have several ecological factors that would help them survive without humans, including:

Adaptability: Lemmings are able to change their behavior and habits in response to environmental changes. For example, they may move to new areas in search of food or to avoid predators.

Reproductive rate: Lemmings have a high reproductive rate, with females able to produce several litters per year. This allows lemming populations to rebound quickly after a decline and helps ensure the survival of the species.

Predator avoidance: Lemmings are able to avoid predators by living in burrows and tunnels that are difficult for predators to access. They are also known for their ability to quickly detect and avoid potential threats.

Food availability: Lemmings feed on a variety of plant materials, including grasses, sedges, and shrubs. In the absence of humans, lemmings may be able to find sufficient food sources in their natural habitat.

Habitat availability: Lemmings are adapted to live in tundra and other northern habitats. In the absence of humans, lemmings may be able to expand their range into areas that were previously occupied by human infrastructure.

Overall, while the disappearance of humans may have ecological impacts on some species,

0 notes