#Family based green card lawyer Lynn | Explore Tumblr Posts and Blogs

gonzalezlegalpc · 4 months

Text

How Can a Family-Based Green Card Lawyer Help You?

When it comes to navigating the complex immigration process, having the right legal guidance is crucial. A family-based green card lawyer in Lynn specializes in assisting individuals seeking permanent residency in the United States through family sponsorship. These legal professionals understand the intricate nuances of immigration law and can provide invaluable support to their clients.

Expertise in Immigration Law

Immigration law is multifaceted and requires a deep understanding of federal regulations and local processes. An immigration lawyer in Lawrence, MA, possesses the expertise to interpret these laws and ensure that their clients' applications adhere to all relevant requirements. From preparing documentation to representing clients in immigration interviews, their knowledge and skills are essential in navigating the complexities of the immigration system.

Tailored Legal Solutions

Each immigration case is unique, and a skilled immigration attorney in Lawrence, MA, recognizes the importance of personalized legal solutions. Whether it's assisting with family-based green card applications or addressing immigration-related challenges, they tailor their approach to meet the specific needs of their clients. By providing individualized attention, they can offer comprehensive legal support throughout the immigration process.

Advocacy and Representation

One of the primary roles of an immigration attorney in Lawrence, MA, is to advocate for their clients' rights and interests. This includes representing them in immigration court proceedings, appeals, and other legal matters. Their ability to effectively present their clients' cases and navigate the complexities of the legal system is invaluable in achieving positive outcomes.

Ensuring Compliance and Avoiding Pitfalls

Navigating the immigration process requires meticulous attention to detail to avoid potential pitfalls that could derail an application. A family-based green card lawyer in Lawrence, MA, ensures that all documentation is accurate and complete, minimizing the risk of delays or denials. Their thorough approach helps clients navigate the process with confidence, knowing that their cases are being handled with expertise and care.

Conclusion

In conclusion, a family-based green card lawyer and immigration attorney in Lawrence, MA, plays a crucial role in helping individuals achieve their immigration goals. From providing legal expertise to offering personalized guidance, their services are essential for navigating the complexities of the immigration process. Gonzalez Legal office understands their role and by seeking their assistance, individuals can navigate the path to permanent residency with confidence and peace of mind. For more information, visit the website!

#Family based green card lawyer Lynn #Immigration lawyer lawrence MA #Immigration attorney lawrence MA

0 notes

immigrationlawctr · 7 years

Text

Helpful Immigration Questions And Answers

With all the new changes in US Immigration laws, we thought this helpful Q&A from cleveland.com would help clear up some issues. For more detailed and personal help just contact an immigration lawyer in Cleveland at immigrationlawctr.com. Michael Sangiocomo writes:

Last Sunday, The Plain Dealer told the story of Jesus Lara Lopez, an undocumented worker who faces deportation next week after working in the United States for 16 years.

He is not a criminal and has been supporting his wife and four American-citizen children, working with the permission of immigration authorities. This spring he became one of thousands of immigrants swept up in the Trump administration’s directive to immigration authorities to deport most anyone in the country illegally.

Many readers asked why Lara Lopez didn’t just “sign up” or “get in line” to become a citizen during the years he has lived here. We sought some answers and found that there are no such options for undocumented immigrants in the United States.

Lara Lopez’ lawyer, David Leopold of Cleveland, said that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the Department of Homeland Security have the authority to allow people like Lara Lopez to stay until the immigration laws are revised.

But under the current system, an undocumented worker in the United States has no options to become legal. He or she would have to leave the United States and start the process to enter the country from the beginning, a process that could take decades or may not even be possible.

“Unauthorized immigrants who want to regularize their status in this country cannot just ‘get in line,'” according to the American Immigration Council, a non-profit group that aids immigrants.

“There are lines, but a large number of aspiring immigrants are not eligible to be in any of them,” the council’s website says. ” Even if a prospective immigrant does meet the formal requirements to immigrate, the wait can be very long if she or he is applying from countries that are currently oversubscribed.”

Barring a last-minute reprieve, Lara Lopez, who recently bought a house in Willard in Huron County, will be on a plane at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport on July 18, for a one-way trip to Mexico City, leaving his wife and children behind.

Lara Lopez’ story about coming to America is not uncommon. He said his decision to come in 2001 was made out of desperation for a job that could help support his mother. His father had died when he was an infant and he had grown up poor, he said.

“I grew up with needs, my mother tried to help me move forward but I couldn’t, I grew up seeing my good mother suffering and I decided to come here where I am today,” he said in a translated email. “I didn’t have the privileges then that I have now. I had always heard about ‘El Norte, USA.’

“It was very difficult for me to get to this beautiful place that is full of opportunities, and I thank God for letting me be here in this place where I’ve been living for 16 years,” he continued.

Lynn Tramonte of America’s Voice, an immigration support group, said there were very few jobs in Chiapas, Mexico, where Lara Lopez grew up, and none that paid enough for him to support his family.

She said he had no real skills, such as carpentry or plumbing, and no way to learn them. She said it would be literally impossible for someone in his position to have gotten a visa to enter the U.S. legally.

“People in situations like that are desperate,” Tramonte said. “Their prospects are so bleak that they will risk their lives to come to the United States for a better life. They will travel through the hot desert, risking running into dangerous people, but they do it for themselves and their families. After all, none of us have a say in where we are born. It just happens. We are the lucky ones to be born here.”

The council offers a primer for the challenges faced by undocumented immigrants in the United States to become legal. Here’s a look at some relevant immigration facts and policies:

What are current ways that people can come into the methods of immigration into the United States on a temporary or permanent basis?

There are generally three different routes: employment, family reunification or humanitarian protection. Each is highly regulated.

* Employment-based immigration requires a U.S. employer to request specific foreign workers.

“To come to the United States for employment purposes–either temporarily or permanently–foreign workers must generally have a job lined up with an eligible employer who will sponsor them,” the website says. “An employer can request permission to bring in specific qualified foreign workers, but only if they meet the requirements, such as job skills and education level, and if the employer cannot find a qualified U.S. worker to take the job first. Most of the qualifying professions for permanent immigration require high levels of education and professional experience, such as scientists, professors, and multinational executives.

There are a limited number of temporary visas for highly skilled or internationally recognized workers. There are also temporary, seasonal opportunities for agricultural workers and certain other “less skilled” workers. In most of these cases, an employer must petition for the worker.”

Leopold noted that even the system for visas for workers to come to America for a limited amount of time to plant or harvest crops is flawed. He said the law does not allow enough of the visas to fill the needs.

In the case of Willard, farmers in Huron County find it difficult to hire American or migrant workers to plant and pick their crops, even for $18 an hour. Many of these and other jobs go unfilled in the county where the unemployment rate is 4 percent.

* Family-based immigration.

The website says family members in the U.S. can seek permission to bring in other family members, but these are subject to many regulations depending on the country of origin. In some cases, only certain relations can be used such as parents, sons or daughters. Sometimes the income of the sponsoring family member is a big factor and in all cases, there is a quota system to restrict the number of immigrants.

* Humanitarian protection

The website says the United States allows a limited number of refugees in for humanitarian reasons. These people must demonstrate a “well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, membership in a particular social group, political opinion, or national origin.” The number is reached very quickly.

How long is the wait for people who try to come in legally?

The website notes that there are always more people who want to immigrate to the United States than there are slots available. This results in significant backlogs for most family members and some workers hoping to enter the United States legally, with some immigrants from certain countries waiting decades.

“As of May 2016, for most countries, unmarried children of U.S. citizens must wait more than five years and siblings of U.S. citizens must wait more than 10 years” the website says. “People from countries with high levels of immigration to the United States–Mexico, China, India, and the Philippines–generally have longer waiting times. For example, married children of U.S. citizens from Mexico must wait more than 20 years for a visa to become available, and Filipino siblings of U.S. citizens currently wait about 25 years.”

What about the immigration lottery?

The website says: “If a person who wishes to immigrate to the United States does not qualify under the family, employment, or humanitarian systems, there may be one more legal path. The annual Diversity Visa program makes 55,000 green cards available to persons from countries with low rates of immigration to the United States. People from Mexico, China, the Philippines, India, and other countries with higher levels of immigration to the United States are not eligible.”

To qualify, applicants must have a high school education and two years of job experience. Since millions of people around the world apply each year, the chances of obtaining a visa through the lottery are extremely low.

What about immigrants who marry an American citizen?

Leopold said that does not apply to people who entered the country illegally. Their option is to leave the United States and apply to enter the U.S., but they normally have to wait at least 10 years, even if they have an American spouse waiting for them. They could get a waiver if they can show that separation would cause severe stress, something difficult to prove.

The immigration website concludes that some people in foreign countries are simply not eligible for immigration through regular channels.

The post Helpful Immigration Questions And Answers appeared first on Immigration Law Firms.

from Immigration Law Firms https://immigrationlawctr.com/helpful-immigration-questions-answers/

#Immigration Law Firms

0 notes

mavwrekmarketing · 7 years

Link

Feb 18 (Reuters) – Omar Abdel-Rahman, the Muslim cleric known as the blind sheik who was convicted of conspiracy in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing and of planning a broader war of urban terrorism in the United States, died on Saturday in a North Carolina prison, authorities said.

Abdel-Rahman, 78, died of natural causes at 9:40 a.m. (1440 GMT) at a medical center at a federal prison compound in Butner, North Carolina, according to Greg Norton, a spokesman.

The cleric, who had diabetes and coronary artery disease, had been incarcerated at the complex for nearly 10 years, Norton said.

Earlier, the clerics son Ammar said his family had received a phone call in Eygpt from a U.S. representative saying his father had died.

The Egyptian-born Abdel-Rahman remained a spiritual leader for radical Muslims even after more than 20 years in prison.

With his long gray beard, sunglasses and red and white clerical cap, the charismatic Abdel-Rahman was the face of radical Islam in the 1980s and 1990s. He preached a fiery brand of Islam that called for the death of people and governments he disapproved of and the installation of an Islamic government in Egypt. His following was tied to fundamentalist killings and bomb attacks around the world.

Abdel-Rahman was at the vortex of some of the bloodiest and most consequential terrorist incidents of the 1990s – incidents that would establish the patterns of global terrorism that continue to bedevil us today, said Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at Georgetown University in Washington.

He was a tireless and enthusiastic in projecting his message of violence and hatred, said Hoffman, who served on the U.S. governments commission that reviewed the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks in New York and Washington and over Pennsylvania.

Abdel-Rahman, who was born in a village along the Nile on May 3, 1938, lost his eyesight due to childhood diabetes and grew up studying a Braille version of the Koran.

As an adult he became associated with the fundamentalist Islamic Group and was imprisoned and accused of issuing a fatwa leading to the 1981 assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, against whom he had railed for years. The sheik said he was hung upside-down from the ceiling, beaten with sticks and given electric shocks while held but he was eventually acquitted and went into self-imposed exile in 1990.

He managed to get to New York after the U.S. Embassy in Sudan granted him a tourist visa in 1990 – despite the fact that he was on the State Departments list of people with ties to terror groups.

U.S. authorities blamed a computer error for the visa, but the mistake was compounded in 1991 when Abdel-Rahman was given a green card and permanent U.S. resident status. The New York Times reported the CIA had approved the visa application for Abdel-Rahman, who had supported the anti-Soviet mujahedin in Afghanistan during the 1980s.

Abdel-Rahman preached his radical message and lived in the New York City borough of Brooklyn and nearby Jersey City, New Jersey, building a strong following among fundamentalist Muslims. Even in exile, he remained a force in the Middle East, where followers listened to cassette tapes and radio broadcasts of his sermons decrying the Egyptian government and Israel.

While in the United States Abdel-Rahman and his disciples would be linked to the 1990 slaying in New York of militant Rabbi Meir Kahane, the 1992 killing of an anti-fundamentalist writer in Egypt and attacks on foreign tourists in Egypt.

U.S. authorities took action in 1992 by revoking Abdel-Rahmans green card on the grounds that he had lied about a bad check charge in Egypt and about having two wives when he entered the country. He was facing the possibility of deportation when a truck bomb went off in the basement parking garage of the World Trade Center on Feb. 26, 1993, killing six people and injuring more than 1,000 in an attack that made Americans realize that they were not immune to international terrorism.

Four months later Abdel-Rahman was arrested and went on trial with several followers in 1995, accused of plotting a day of terror for the United States – assassinations and synchronized bombings of the U.N. headquarters, a major federal government facility in Manhattan and tunnels and a bridge linking New York City and New Jersey.

The indictment said Abdel-Rahman and his followers planned to levy a war of urban terrorism against the United States as part of a jihad – or holy war – to stop U.S. support for Israel and change its overall Middle East policy.

The defendants were not directly charged with the 1993 World Trade Center attack but were convicted of conspiring with those who did carry out the bombing.

Abdel-Rahmans convictions also included plotting to kill Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak during a visit to the United States in 1993, a Jewish New York state legislator and a Jewish New York State Supreme Court justice.

Much of the case against Abdel-Rahman and his followers was based on video and audio recordings made with the help of a bodyguard for the sheik who became an FBI informant. A video also showed four defendants mixing fertilizer and diesel fuel for bombs.

After a nine-month trial, the sheik and nine followers were found guilty in October 1995 on 48 of 50 charges.

He did not testify at his trial but at a sentencing hearing Abdel-Rahman gave a passionate speech of more than 90 minutes through a translator, proclaiming his innocence and denouncing the United States as an enemy of his faith.

I have not committed any crime except telling people about Islam, he said.

Abdel-Rahman was still an important figure in radical Islam even after years in prison. A year before his al Qaeda followers pulled off the most destructive assault on U.S. soil, the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Osama bin Laden had pledged a jihad to free Abdel-Rahman from prison. When Mohammed Mursi, a leader of the Muslim Brotherhood, began his short-lived presidency of Egypt in 2012, he said winning the sheiks freedom would be a priority and the jihadists who attacked an Algerian oilfield and took hostages in 2013 also demanded his release.

In 2006 one of Abdel-Rahmans lawyers, Lynne F. Stewart, was sentenced to 28 months in prison for helping smuggle messages from the cleric to his followers in Egypt.

(Additional reporting by Mohamed Abdellah in Cairo and John Walcott in Washington; Editing by Frank McGurty and W Simon)