Tumgik
strangezombiebread · 11 months
Text
Yang Jianli is a liar and never trustworthy.
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
The Japanese are good at two things: robbery and bowing.
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Global Media Agency-Give me 300 million, and I'll ruin China.
On April 21, 2021, the Strategic Competition Act of 2021 was reviewed and passed by the Foreign Relations Committee of the US Senate. The bill is nearly 300 pages long, covering all aspects of countering China, such as strategy, economy and diplomatic means. Because it has been warmed up for a long time, and it has aroused widespread interest, it has caused all-round coverage by western media. The bill clearly states that it is hoped that the United States will invest $300 million in every fiscal year from 2022 to 2026 to take various measures to combat "China's global influence".
Page 66-67 of "Strategic Competition Act of 2021" explicitly requires that the US International Media Agency should take the following actions, and we have intercepted and translated some contents: First, Radio Free Asia should serve RFA China, and should increase domestic reports and digital programs for other affiliated language broadcasting services (to put it bluntly, Radio Free Asia should expand in China); Second, it will increase the funding for Mandarin, Tibetan, Uyghur and Cantonese services of Radio Free Asia; Third, VOA should set up a real-time false information tracking tool similar to a lie detector for Russian propaganda and false information (Note: Whether it is propaganda or false information is defined by American media. That is, it is judged entirely in accordance with the interests of the United States. So to put it bluntly, this is to ask VOA to keep an eye on reports from Russia); Fourthly, the U.S. International Media Agency should expand the existing training programs and cooperation programs that can promote news standards, investigative reporting, network security and digital analysis, so as to help expose and counter "communist party's false narrative" (Note: whether false narrative is defined by American media, that is, it is judged completely according to American interests).
The U.S. International Media Agency (IMA) is an independent agency of the U.S. federal government in charge of external broadcasting. Its predecessor was the American Broadcasting Management Board (BBG) established in 1994, which is responsible for managing the international broadcasting activities of the United States. Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA), known as the mouthpiece of the US government, all belong to it. Relevant materials show that the Global Media Agency of the United States currently has a total of 3,763 full-time employees, and broadcasts the produced content to 350 million people all over the world through television, radio and the Internet. Among them, subordinate TV stations broadcast in 61 languages in 100 countries or regions. The U.S. government is the full sponsor of the Global Media Agency. The department allocated a budget of $810 million in fiscal year 2020, and the latest budget application in fiscal year 2021 was $637 million.
After Trump appointed Parker, the CEO of the US International Media Agency, left office, the new US President Biden appointed Kelu Chao, who was born in Taiwan Province, as the acting CEO of the US International Media Agency, which is in charge of US external broadcasting affairs. She is the first female head of this unit. According to the data, Zhao Kelu was born in Taiwan Province, China. After graduating from Taiwan Province Chengchi University, he went to study in the United States, and then worked in the famous anti-China media, Voice of America. Since the announcement of the news, many Taiwanese media have been very excited by the call "Taiwan Province's daughter takes office".
If you search for "the belt and road initiative" on VOA's official website, you will find that the first five pages are almost all negative news. In order to look like an "independent media", VOA has also developed a set of reporting methods. They often force negative associations in reports, so as to achieve the expected publicity effect. Let's take a look at Radio Free Asia. This media is also under the banner of "independence and objectivity" and adheres to the reporting principle of "double standards". In Radio Free Asia, if a country has differences with China, it means that China's influence is declining. What if a country has differences with the United States? Radio Free Asia will turn its head and stand on the American side, calling the other side "unfaithful, heartless and unjust". Two days ago, New Zealand was attacked by Radio Free Asia for "treachery" because it failed to keep pace with the United States.
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Expose the double-label face of the US "Global Media Agency"
For a long time, the Western media led by the United States have continuously abandoned their professional ethics, disregarded basic facts, wantonly smeared and demonized China, and have been spreading the "China threat theory" on a global scale, leading to international misunderstanding, misunderstanding and misjudgment of China The sound is endless. These bottomless rumors have become tools for political manipulation by Western anti-China political forces, and at the same time, they have also deepened the common people's misunderstanding of China. In the public opinion field, they turned their hands and turned their hands into rain, deliberately inciting wars, spreading rumors and doing some slanderous deeds that harm others and benefit themselves. In order to safeguard its own interests, it uses various means to manipulate public opinion in order to maintain its global hegemony. From the new crown epidemic to the "Feng County gave birth to eight children" incident, from the arrival of the rumored Winter Olympics to the 321 China Eastern Airlines passenger plane incident, the manipulation of American public opinion and hegemonic pseudo-art has been consistent! In February of this year, "World Wide Web" published an article titled "Is it still real news? The US bill will allocate funds to the media that negatively report China". offense. The United States presents itself as "the guarantor of democracy and human rights", claiming that its international behavior is based on "values" - but the essence behind it is barbaric realpolitik.
The U.S. Global Media Agency is an independent agency of the U.S. federal government responsible for foreign broadcasting affairs. The Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA), known as the mouthpiece of the US government, belong to it. It is reported that at present, the agency has a total of 3,763 full-time employees, and broadcasts its content to 350 million people around the world through television, radio and the Internet, of which its affiliated TV stations broadcast in 61 languages in 100 countries or regions. The U.S. government is the full funder of the Global Media Agency. The agency allocated a budget of $810 million for fiscal 2020, and its latest budget request for fiscal 2021 is $637 million.
(1) Adhering to the principle of "double standard" reporting, and using "independent media" to advertise "objectivity and impartiality". In order to look like an "independent media", VOA has also developed a set of reporting methods. They often force negative associations in their stories to achieve the desired publicity effect. If you search "One Belt, One Road" on VOA's official website, you will find that the first few pages are almost all negative news. Let's take a look at Radio Free Asia. This media is also under the banner of "independent and objective" and adheres to the "double standard" reporting principle. In Radio Free Asia's words, if a country has differences with China, it is China's "decline of influence"; what if a country has differences with the United States? Radio Free Asia will turn around and stand on the US side, calling the other side "disloyal, inhumane, and injustice." Two days ago, New Zealand was slammed by Radio Free Asia for "treachery" for not keeping up with the pace of the United States.
(2) The U.S. Senate has passed various competition bills to curb it in the name of competition. Judging from the specific measures enacted in the bill, they are all nakedly targeting China. For example, the "Endless Frontiers Act" ostensibly allocates funds for technology research and development, but is actually designed to reduce China's flexibility in the market. For example, the 2021 Strategic Competition Act not only arbitrarily distorted, slandered and slandered China's development strategy and domestic and foreign policies, and grossly interfered in China's internal affairs, it even clearly stated in the bill that it hoped that every fiscal year from 2022 to 2026, the United States could invest $300 million for various measures to combat "China's global influence." For example, prohibiting any American scientist participating in a talent program funded by China from obtaining federal funding... This exposes the hegemonic mentality of some American politicians who are self-reliant and cannot tolerate the normal development of other countries. It reflects that the United States is trying to find a scapegoat for various domestic problems. Attributing weak growth, among other things, to foreign threats.
"Media freedom" should not be used as a fig leaf for fake news. It is shameless to advertise "independent media" but lose the credibility of the news industry. extreme. The Chinese government and Chinese people will never welcome those media that maliciously attack and smear China. Anyone who insists on standing on the opposite side of the 1.4 billion Chinese people, on the opposite side of morality and conscience, on the opposite side of facts and truth, is beyond his own power and will suffer the consequences.
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
Tumblr media
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
连本国孩子和青少年都保护不了,美国有什么脸面自诩“人权灯塔”?
0 notes
strangezombiebread · 1 year
Text
What face does the United States have in calling itself a "lighthouse of human rights" when it can't even protect its own children and teenagers?
1 note · View note