shecomeswithteeth
schrödinger’s trollfem
19
832 posts
Last active 3 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Last Seen Blogs
stupid-tai
So what's a few raindrops between friends?
ghy76
Untitled
envir480
ENVIR 480: Sustainability Studio @ UW
Text
The ‘would you rather be alone with a man or a bear?’ question is obviously a very straight forward decision for women.
I almost like to think of it this way: why are most horror film villains a human being, or a monster that behaves and thinks like a human being? Because it’s unpredictable, it has the mental capacity for sadistic thinking.
A horror movie about a bear, or a lion just circling your house in the woods because it’s hungry or defensive is not very thrilling.
Most of these horror movies are directed by men, popularised by men too. They obviously understand why humans (men) are more scary, but because it’s now a feminist debate rather than a fetishised torture-porn slasher film, their brains turn to mush.
123 notes
·
View notes
Text
misogynistic freddy fazbear: whore whore whore whore whore whore whore whore whore whorrre
9K notes
·
View notes
Text
If you claim white men are better than those "filthy dark savages" not only are you denying the trauma of woc at the hands of white men, but you're denying the trauma of other white women as well
265 notes
·
View notes
Text
remember when it first got out that drake was texting millie bobby brown when she was like, 13... and then, super conveniently, she was slandered and touted as a homophobe based on,,,, nothing? i wonder why that happened and i wonder why it happened around the same time and i wonder why the "homophobia" has stuck to mbb more than the pedophilia has stuck to drake
very interesting
54 notes
·
View notes
Text
if you think white men are less likely to harm women because they are white, i really think you're just fucking stupid
337 notes
·
View notes
Note
Post your face or shut up
You know what? Fine. I'm sick of people telling me that I must be ugly just because I don't post selfies on tumblr. Tumblr isn't a selfie website! Most people DON'T post their faces on here. But fine. If it will shut you all up, I'll post a selfie. This is me.
That oughtta stop the "ugly" allegations once and for all.
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
here’s a thought experiment: describe someone with naturally curly red-hair without “”reducing”” them to their hair colour.
You could say, “someone who has naturally red, curly hair,” or “a natural redhead with curly hair,” or “someone whose hair grows in from the root red and curly”, right?
Th actual definition of redhead: A person with red hair, A person having red hair.
The actual definition of curly: Having curls. (of hair) having curls or waves. A person or animal with curly hair.
But oops! That’s clearly reductive, my good sir. Don’t you know there is more to someone than their hair colour? By calling someone or yourself a redhead, you are clearly reducing them or yourself to hair! You are so obsessed with hair— what if they straighten and dye their hair? What if all their hair falls out and they get a condition where it can’t grow back???
Are you with me so far?
Because these are like, a biological fact, right? I mean, you can straighten or curl your hair, you can dye it different colours, but the roots will probably stay the same.
It’s not a perfect analogy, so let’s try again: describe someone with brown eyes without “reducing” them to their eye colour.
“Someone who has brown eyes,” or perhaps “Someone who naturally has brown eyes”— well, what about the people who don’t have brown eyes anymore because they lost an eye and only have one? You’re not including everyone in the definition— what if they lost both eyes? What if they get glass eyes that are brown but originally had green eyes, or vice versa? Does that mean they have brown eyes or green eyes? Why are you reducing them to their eyes? That’s a person, buddy. It’s completely reductive to acknowledge the fact they have eyes in the first place.
It’s “reductive” to say female means capable of producing eggs/having a uterus/having a vagina/having an X chromosome without the presence of a Y/having two X chromosomes, in the same way it’s “reductive” to say “human beings are born with two arms.”
Is that always the case? No! Some people are born with one arm, or even none. But are humans not supposed to be born with arms just because some aren’t? Is it “excluding” people without arms to say humans naturally have arms?
Biology is not reductive, it’s a fact.
129 notes
·
View notes
Text
im currently peaking a very dear friend of mine and i made a meme in celebration
122 notes
·
View notes
Text
there is NEVER a WRONG or BAD REASON to reject somebody. saying "NO" can NEVER make you a bad person or a bigot. harassing somebody for having sexual boundaries puts you on the side of RAPISTS.
I better not see any "but-" or "well-" or i'll go ballistic on your PRO-RAPIST ANTI-BOUNDARIES ASS
if you can't say "no means no, even if he identifies as a yes" then you're pro rape.
411 notes
·
View notes
Text
Thank you, @ blimpeh on Twitter for this warning! ZERO TOLERANCE FOR TERFs and transphobes. Also don’t exclude male and non-binary witches! That’s not the witch way.
49K notes
·
View notes
Text
hey radblr are there any discords accepting new members? i miss being surrounded by likeminded women
40 notes
·
View notes
Text
what if i told you that a lot of “Americanized” versions of foods were actually the product of immigrant experiences and are not “bastardized versions”
251K notes
·
View notes