Tumgik
resisteverything · 2 hours
Text
Okay that was my mistake. I didn’t read to the end and assumed you’d use the same point. I didn’t know you’d use this disingenuous “All I said was that bears can die” reframing of your point, and I thought we were still arguing over whether or not bears will definitely kill you for being in their presence or if they’ll possibly leave you alone.
I should have read what you wrote better. I thought you weren’t going to use logical fallacies.
If I used the fallacy it would be “all I said was bears aren’t the fucking terminator and cocaine bear isn’t a documentary”
But that’s not what I said so I won’t say it was.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 3 hours
Text
That is such a disingenuous way of phrasing it. I know bears are obviously real because we have pictures. It is not the same as knowing that bears will obviously objectively kill you if they see you in any scenario regardless of species and that there’s little hope of survival without killing it. If i’m going to believe that I’ll need a reputable source who will verify this information. Because if it turned out that bears were gentle and harmless creatures it would track with their appearance. If it turned out Gators would gang up on you and eat you and there was no stopping them i’d believe you. But it turns out that knowledge is more complicated than that.
I’m asking some very basic questions. You have information on bears I did not receive from the zoo or my parents or tv or the internet or educational content or social media. Where did you get it from and why do you consider it obvious when everyone i’ve encountered up to this point has contradicted it?
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 4 hours
Text
I did not say that at all. My actual question was if you’d need to shoot a bear.
Also critical thinking without research would tell me that If I tried to race a cheeta in a marathon i’d win, but science would tell me otherwise. So “critical thinking” doesn’t work if it’s about something you’ve never encountered and don’t understand.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 8 hours
Text
“Even though my point is extremely obvious and impossible to deny, I both think you actually don’t believe in what i’m saying and refuse to provide evidence for my point”
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 8 hours
Text
So common sense doesn’t count if it’s untrue? Then how do you know this information? If something being agreed upon as obviously true doesn’t make it common sense, that means you know this is true for some other reason. How? How do you know this? It shouldn’t be hard to prove or explain if it’s so damn obvious. Who told you? It didn’t magically pop into your head one day. Who told you and what makes them an expert? What makes them better people to listen to than the people im listening to?
“I’m obviously right” isn’t an argument. If you can’t provide proof and can’t write me off as a troll for not knowing then it’s not actually obvious.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 8 hours
Text
If the truth was obvious how would these people not know it? Tell lies when the obvious truth will get their website just as much clicks and more trust?
And why should I trust the supposed “obvious truth” when no actual sources line up on this.
Why is it obvious? Who recorded this information? Who told you? No one?
Did you know you would probably beat a Cheeta in a marathon? And if you race a horse on foot to the nearest tree and back you could possibly win? These are proven and explainable things, but they sound obviously false. Taking things as fact because they sound true isn’t enough.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 8 hours
Text
Common sense also tells you that going out in the cold makes you sick, which is probably false, and not eating before swimming is also fake. The idea that it’s rude to share your salary was invented by rich people so you’d never have an idea of how much your coworkers are making and will never ask for a raise.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 11 hours
Note
I wanna be even more annoying.
could you be any more annoying.. lol
Easily
146K notes · View notes
resisteverything · 12 hours
Text
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 14 hours
Text
The choice of the woman being a murderer was never given. If I knew for a fact this woman was like a serial killer i’d probably choose the bear since a bear isn’t set out with the goal of killing me. But this has kind of recreated patriarchal fears honestly.
Men talk about how feminism trains women to be afraid of and distrust men, but a lot of women say that a major influence was their protective fathers, who were not feminists but still earned them about boys, and it wasn’t lost on them that their brothers were never warned about girls.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 16 hours
Text
According to what source? Who told you this? No source on surviving a bear attack ever tells you to shoot it.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 16 hours
Text
My online sources say that they most likely not going to attack and also bear attacks on the whole are more dangerous to the bears than the people they attack. I don’t know how but psychology today and north american bear center are more reputable sources than no sources, which is what you give.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 16 hours
Text
Considering the woman would rather see a bear than see me, and would likely go the other way if they were a murderer or something, i’d say a woman again.
And I see the danger in minimizing the harm a woman could do, the fact is female violence is far less common, consistently so.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 16 hours
Text
Yeah you’ve never actually talked to a feminist have you? As a feminist i’ve never once had the thought that a skinny model was “fat-shaming” nor have I ever felt like judging a woman for her life choices, and i’d consider someone who does super un-feminist. And we’re talking about bears, not man spreading.
Also statistics show that 80 percent of bear attacks are male bears. Where’s your source?
The women in the man vs best video were women on the street, random women who probably had boyfriends and decent relationships with their fathers, not college feminists. This is just a good chunk of like, all women basically.
And as a feminist, i’d like to have shit done to me by men that you’ve never even heard of, so this epidemic you speak of would never happen. Like I said, those were random women on the street, like the average woman thinks this and we still haven’t had the problems you described. There’s a massive difference between a stranger in the woods and a person you know and trust well.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 16 hours
Text
A woman, because stories like “4 women beat, tortured, raped, and ate a monitor lizard while filming it” don’t really happen, but four men did in fact do that, and I don’t really know how to interact with bears correctly.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 17 hours
Text
Being a wild animal doesn’t mean you do things for no reason. You ever see that youtube video of a man surrounded by fucking alligators who just sort of pushes them down by the snout and they leave him alone?
Also if bears will instantly kill you for being near them why do guides to bear encounters tell you to get them to go away by yelling? Wouldn’t that just make it worse? Why would anyone believe that if it both felt like the wrong answer and was the wrong answer?
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes
resisteverything · 17 hours
Text
Why do bear survival guides say to get loud then instead of killing them? Why do they say bears are just as scared of you? Do park rangers want you to die? Is that why they lie to you?
Or are these both true, that bears are scared of you and warded off by yelling but also will only stop if you kill them and will attack you for no reason. Have you encountered a bear? Did you have to shoot it to survive?
I’ve seen perspectives that contradict yours, from people who are not anonymous, so i’m inclined to believe them more because if they lie they have to answer for that in real life with their name and face. So what experiences make you think this? Because statistics seem to contradict what you’re saying.
The question to women that’s gone viral:
Would you rather be in the woods alone w a man or a bear?
Majority of women said bear.
Why? Because even if it did maul us, the following would happen-
1. We wouldn’t be blamed for the attack
2. We would be believed
3. People would hunt down that bear without giving it a second thought
343 notes · View notes