Only products by this brand. This is a great shtick. But only so long as this is the only brand that does it

theres a popular brand in canada called no name brand and it manufactures everything you can imagine in a grocery store and it kind of makes me feel like im in a world no one bothered to do much world building for

There are 7000 aid trucks waiting at the Egyptian border

you aren’t a bad person for having “bad” teeth. you’re not less worthy of love or respect because your teeth are cracked/broken/crooked/discolored. ppl with “bad” teeth deserve better

Wow wtf HIV/AIDS was discovered by Flossie Wong-Staal, an Chinese-American woman, and she’s the reason the HIV test even exists. AND THEN she invented the molecular knife that lead to treatments for HIV/AIDS. And she’s STILL ALIVE. We don’t hear about the contributions of Women of Color enough, my word. Madness.

I'm now an adult and not single

Okay but seriously this is a good question. If you take the gorilla: You could easily find a shop to lock yourself in. Don't look at the gorilla at all and stay hidden. You'll be just fine. The 5 snakes could more easily get in where you are, be hiding, and sneak up on you. Also, there's 5 of them. You have one gorilla. Avoiding one gorilla is easier than 5 snakes. However, if you challenged them, you don't stand a chance at winning. You could hope the gorilla would let you go and surrender, and it would be your best shot at survival. They're extremely strong and would rock your shit

And yeah gorillas can be gentle giants, they've been known to be concerned for children who've fallen into their enclosures and they only attack if you do something that they'd interpret as a challenge. Gorillas also don't usually try to pick a fight with those smaller than them if they're not asking for it, because they have some fairness.

Meanwhile the snakes: they are the deadliest snakes in the world, and huge - up to 14 feet long. They're also really fast. 12.5 mph fast. They'd probably avoid you, in all fairness - they're extremely cowardly and flee when possible. They don't want beef with you because you could tie them in a knot. They will also warn you before striking by hissing and showing their mouth. Unless you accidentally step on a snake, you'd likely have to go out of your way to bother one to get bitten.

But, if they were cornered and felt threatened, it would be lights out because unless your 24 hours is over and you have an ambulance waiting, you will die within 20 minutes. They will strike multiple times and they have some of the most potent venom. Unlike the gorilla, you have no hope of being let go

I'm taking the silverback because both species will leave me alone if I leave them alone, I just think I'm less likely to end up accidentally fucking with a gorilla than I am one of five snakes, and I could lock myself somewhere a gorilla couldn't get in, but would have a significantly harder time making sure the snakes don't get in

Sex work as an industry is very dangerous and ripe with exploitation. For this reason, it should be legalized

Sex workers are so vulnerable to exploitation and dangers because their work is illegal. They have little to no workers' rights, and they know that if something bad does happen to them, whether it's getting screwed over, being exploited, or getting hurt, they can't tell anyone. Not the courts, and especially not the cops. Because they will get in trouble for being a sex worker. If sex work was legal, sex workers wouldn't have to be afraid to report anything that happens to them. If sex work was legal, the industry could be regulated to protect the rights of sex workers and prevent their exploitation

So basically if you're critical of the sex work industry, you should want it to be legal. Legalization of sex work would allow for the industry to be regulated.

I mean yeah I agree that the responsibility isn't on TERFs, and someone who clearly needs a procedure being denied it based on gendered language is bad, but this loophole does get exploited so when TERFs throw a fit about gender neutral language, it is as OP said: they care more about their comfort than the lives and health of trans people, and the point of my addition was to explain to this idiot why her question was dumb as fuck and tell her what OP actually meant

Everytime a cis women tries to argue against gender neutral language in medical settings it becomes very clear they care more about their comfort then trans men being denied medical care and dying.

I don’t care how ‘uncomfortable’ the terms person with a uterus, person who can give birth, person with breasts, etc. makes you. I very much care more about trans men having access to medical care than a cis person’s feelings.

Aesthetically (irregardless of how problematic) what is your favourite lesbian flag?

Labrys

Lipstick lesbian

Lesbian pride (lipstick minus lipstick mark)

Warm butch

Dark/cool butch

Emily gwen’s, 7 stripe

Emily gwen’s, 5 stripe

Double venus on rainbow

Sappho lesbian

Sappho lesbian + white stripe

Other

See results

//another poll for the one people like to use wld be cool. But t.b.h. I can’t be assed. Love this blog!!! Thanks for the good time.

Never let being either gender stop you from being nonbinary

never let being a girl stop you from being a boy

"we have a duty to phase out predation" no dumbass we have a duty to not abandon our pets outside as if they're not domestic animals that can't survive out there. How do you not see that the problem is pet abandonment and not the fact that carnivores exist

I hate how I can't even see posts about wild predators anymore without being reminded that this stupid organisation exists.

FUCK that post Luz Noceda is gonna be an mspec lesbian now. I've decided this on a whim.

Just saw a post that was like,,, Luz Noceda hates mspec lesbians,,, and like did we watch the same show?? Her whole thing is being a weirdo?? Lmao she loves mspec gays.

No, you can be a bitch and misgender nonbinary and trans people all day without directly killing them, but that's not the point. If a nonbinary person has their legal gender as "nonbinary" and legal + medical wording around procedures that use the words "woman" or "female" mean trans people can be legally denied care that they might need if their legal gender is different than the papers say can get the procedure. If insurance covers pap smears for women, then trans men and nonbinary afabs can be denied coverage if their legal gender isn't "woman." That's the point. Gendered language soothes your false perception that you're being degendered by the terms "people with breasts, people with uteruses, people who menstruate, pregnant people" and other such terms (none of these terms deny that you're a woman, they just include people who aren't women as well), and nongendered language means anyone who belongs to these categories that are not legally women, whether they are afab and got a legal gender change or if they're amab trans women who haven't gotten their legal gender change yet, have access to medical care based on their bodies and not their legal identity

Everytime a cis women tries to argue against gender neutral language in medical settings it becomes very clear they care more about their comfort then trans men being denied medical care and dying.

I don’t care how ‘uncomfortable’ the terms person with a uterus, person who can give birth, person with breasts, etc. makes you. I very much care more about trans men having access to medical care than a cis person’s feelings.

"you are addicted to screens" no no you see i am actually addicted to my friends. unfortunately they live in there

hi *hands u my cat in a bag*

AFGFUUJRJON KITTY