I'm so curious what radblr's alignments are, I think it would be pretty fun lmao

I maintain that tumblr doesn't just have a problem with reading comprehension; it has a problem with reading period

I’ve come to the the realization I’m not against men being in feminism I’m against the pandering and who they address with their feminism.

Men shouldn’t be addressing women and policing what is feminist behavior in women they should be doing that to men.

Men should be preaching feminism to each other and not be so heavily focused on attracting women and instead begin attracting predominantly male audiences because if all the male feminist can do is argue and police women then he is not a feminist, he is just another man who wants control he just does it under the impression he is ‘saving’ or ‘helping’ the woman which to me is infinitely worse.

If you want to be a feminist as a man by all means go ahead, just know who your audience is meant to be.

in this video ill be going over the creepy groceries iceberg. now if you dont know an iceberg is a way of organising information that gets more obscure or weird the further you go down. okay without further ado lets get right into it. remember to like hit the bell and subscribe. the first tier is the surface tier so the first entry we are gonna go over is snickers bars. so some say these are just normal chocolate treats but what you might not know is they also contain peanuts, which in some cases can cause allergic reactions which have been known to actually unalive people. now some people do believe this is just a regular thing to see in a grocery store and they put them there because people "like the taste" but to me that doesnt seem likely. others think they are a secret government weapon and theres actually a ton of evidence like this picture of obama with somebody eating a snickers in the background. ill leave a link to the snickers wikipedia page in the description below if you wanna check it out and come to your own conclusion but all i know is im gonna be avoiding the snickers aisle at my local supermarket next time i buy groceries. speaking of groceries, todays sponsor is manscaped VPN

i can't fucking stand usamericans and their obsession with individual choice. oh my god the neoliberal brainrot is real.

i can't physically stand any type of analysis or critique about social issues coming from usamericans because they'll legit be like "the sexualization of women is a big problem and we shouldn't pressure young women into presenting themselves sexually for the benefit of men. HOWEVER if a woman CHOOSES out of her FREE WILL to use her sex appeal and be sexy BECAUSE SHE WANTS TO, it is completely fine!! slay 💅" there is no way you are this dumb. you have never thought about anything ever. you don't understand how society and human behavior work.

actually, basically nothing that you choose is completely out of free will. free will doesn't really exist in the sense that we are a social species and we are constantly influenced by our environment and our past experiences. your choices are inherently tied to your environment. there is no such thing as a completely individual choice.

i know we joke a lot during misandry hours, but the fact of the matter is men aren't inhuman. they do have convictions and conscience. they do have love and compassion. they are capable of immense kindness, thoughtfulness and empathy. they are very often curious and intelligent.

the difference is they don't think of women as having any of those things hence don't extend the moral consideration they would extend toward "fellow human beings". they genuinely view women as animals. and how do they view animals? as primitive. infantile. not as evolved or cultivated. mostly mindless hence mostly incapable of suffering. they don't have as much mind and their "self" is weak, so there is no memory or centralized experience, no history to the individual woman.

the same way a man can have a dog and slaughter a screaming chicken is the same way he can be a loving husband to his wife and still rape an underage girl. it's how they've all lived for so long that it's not contradictory to their behavior.

so him being nice to "his women" isn't proof you're safe with him. him demonstrating any virtue to others still isn't proof you're safe with him. him being devout to a "kind loving god" is not proof you're safe with him. him humouring you on anything isn't proof you're safe with him. him being gnc is not proof you're safe with him.

his humanity does not mean he sees you as human as well. it is nowhere near a guarantee. please understand this.

I’ve enjoyed over-analyzing fiction through a radical-feminist lense with you all on here, though unfortunately I have gravely eroded my ability to fully immerse myself in fictional narratives anymore. I now struggle to view characters as representations of people or simple plot devices, and instead painstakingly view them as mere vehicles to explore either the author’s or audience’s unconscious biases in regards to sex and/or sexual orientation dynamics. Basically, consuming fiction now feels like reading an essay or critiquing a social theory, rather than entertainment. I have lost my ability to suspend my disbelief, in a way. If that makes any sense.

"I would never-"

You would if you were tired enough. You would if you were hungry enough. You would if your mind and body had been worn down enough, through pain or disease or toil or violent struggle. You might if you were put on the wrong medicine, or you got the wrong kind of head injury, or you were forced to choose between someone else and yourself. You might if your livelihood was staked on it, or all your hopes and dreams. You might if you didn't know what else to do, if it's what you were taught or if nobody taught you anything else.

I have not been worn down in most of these ways. I have lived a remarkably privileged life. But I have been worn down in some ways. And they were enough to teach me that in the wrong circumstances, any of us can become someone we don't want to be. It's worth keeping that in mind.

...........................................................

ok what’s your florence + the machine song. mine is rabbit heart (raise it up)<3

I must not respond to the bad take. Responding to the bad take is the mind-killer. Responding to the bad take is the little-death that brings total obliteration. I will face the bad take. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past, I will turn the inner eye to see its path. Where the bad take has gone there will be nothing. Only I (and my good takes) will remain.

"We have to make teens read fictional novels featuring graphic depictions of racism, misogyny, child abuse, physical violence, sexual violence, etc. in school or else how are they going to learn about those things?" no prizes for guessing the sex and race of the person who said this.

Art by Yuming Li

I wish

from now on your tumblr nickname is whatever you get from this sexual identity generator  ☆