nitrateglow - Tumblr blog

nitrateglow

I like to viddy the old films now and then

A dream to some, a nightmare to others.

126275 posts

Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.

Last Seen Blogs

vapestox

Untitled

quillandpad

Quill & Pad

railleriee

Railleriee

obsidianymph

boom♱

akvzz3u8xs

Untitled

nitrateglow · 6 hours

Text

Premiere night for Psycho. Times Square, New York City, 1960

102 notes · View notes

nitrateglow · 6 hours

Photo

Lily Powers

Barbara Stanwyck in Baby Face (1933)

#i love that outfit in the bottom two gifs #i love the cuffs especially

837 notes · View notes

nitrateglow · 6 hours

Photo

Myrna Loy in Libeled Lady (1936) dir. Jack Conway

684 notes · View notes

nitrateglow · 6 hours

Photo

Irene Ware in The Raven (1935).

156 notes · View notes

nitrateglow · 6 hours

Photo

Guy Bourdin - Isabelle Weingarten for Yves Saint Laurent (Vogue Paris 1970)

585 notes · View notes

nitrateglow · 6 hours

Text

Scattered thoughts on the West Side Story remake

In general, I really enjoyed the film, largely on the strength of the performances. Everyone ranged from pretty good to amazing, with Rachel Ziegler and Ariana DeBose being the standouts. And Rita Moreno's supporting part was brilliant-- I like how she was given a substantial role and not just a lame ass cameo.

The music and dancing were great too. Ziegler's voice is just gorgeous. One trend I don't like in some modern musicals is casting famous people who cannot sing (Russell Crowe in Les Mis and Meryl Streep and Pierce Brosnan in Mamma Mia still haunt my nightmares). While not everyone here is a 100% unknown, I like that everyone seems to have been hired because they can actually hit the notes.

I thought the beefed up backstories for some of the characters were really interesting. (Chino's buffed up personality and background were my favorite of these new touches. He goes from being a breathing plot device to a truly tragic figure in this version.) I know some people don't like how Tony was made into an ex-con, but I appreciate that this time around they wanted to make him feel more like a credible ex-gang member. That's something I never bought in the 1961 film.

Speaking of the 1961 version, I haven't seen it in a few years, so I can't compare the two in more detail, though I do remember enough to where I can say I preferred the staging and direction in certain scenes in the older film. A lot of it has to do with my personal aesthetic preferences though.

Like, I'm not as crazy about Spielberg's staging of Tony and Maria's first encounter at the dance. The dancing between the rival groups is spectacular, but there's so much going on that the lovers get overwhelmed by it. The blocking of the scene has them retreat behind the bleachers to have their first dance (a parallel to showing Romeo and Juliet's instant chemistry through a conversation in sonnet form). However, I much prefer the 1961 film's dreamy approach, where time slows and only the lovers remain in focus. I get not wanting to repeat such an iconic moment or it coming off as corny in the 2020s, but I don't think it was replaced by anything of equal inspiration.

Actually, this brings me to a general issue I had with the remake's more pronounced "gritty and realistic" approach. One on hand, it makes sense-- the original show and 1961 film were noted for their realism, or at least, their very expressionist-tinged realism. It's meant to contrast with the romanticism of the lovers, who like Romeo and Juliet, want to go "Somewhere" their love won't be poisoned by divided loyalties and violence.

However, the more pronounced sense of unvarnished reality has two drawbacks in Spielberg's version. One, it makes the "falling in honestly and truly love in less than 48 hours" thing a bit harder to swallow. I can buy love at first sight in heightened, operatic reality-- less so in a setting that wants to resemble everyday reality.

Second, there are a hell of a lot of moments where characters break into song and the extras around them give them "wtf" looks. It's like the gag in Enchanted where Giselle starts singing in the park and Robert's like, "what now," only that movie's a meta-parody of animated musicals and WSS wants me to invest in this world and these characters. Having other people go "0_0" when someone sings takes me out the movie. You can't have your old-fashioned musical and your 21st century "lol irony take nothing seriously" schtick in the same film.

But overall, I really enjoyed this one. It's a remake that isn't just a rehash of a beloved film and it makes decisions that distinguish it completely. I plan on rewatching the 60s version, actually, just to reintroduce myself to it, since it has been over half a decade now.

#thoughts

4 notes · View notes

nitrateglow · 7 hours

Text

100 years ago, Buster Keaton’s “Sherlock Jr.” had its grand premiere in Los Angeles (April 26, 1924)

36 notes · View notes

nitrateglow · 7 hours

Text

Cavity Colors has released a Suspiria collection that includes T-shirts ($30), long sleeves ($40), zip-up hoodies ($50), and sweatpants ($45) designed by Devon Whitehead and Dismay Design, plus two enamel pins designed by Matthew Skiff ($15). They’ll ship the week of May 24.