Multipurpose Education

It may be interesting to talk about the connection between structure and function between the origin of life and the origin of the universe. Not in a comparative meaning But in such a way that all systems in nature work The assumptions of the general model between life and the universe are not original. Pribram (1969), Bohm (1986) and Talbot (1991) propose a possible connection between the work of organic life. (Especially the brain) and the nature of the universe The Holographic theory that they support assumes that everything in the biological and cosmic domains is part of a singular whole - not a black hole, but a fractional part. Overall, everything responds to it and has structure and function. Intertwined

 This idea is exciting and criticized - the latter is because it is a model, not only But it's hard to prove empirically But still difficult Vu Learning to create ideas For example, you may be asked What is "connective tissue" involved, and what is the wave function that turns a part into a part through a disturbance pattern? Although some studies and theories have raised the level of optimism about the existence of wave patterns (Pietsch 1981), there is no evidence for this idea.

 Despite this kind of criticism, it is possible to make a claim. On the other hand, almost all theoretical physics is based on speculation. Newton, Einstein, Planck, and Heisenberg provide insights and evidence about "anything" in physics, but they can't give "why". That is specifically explained why. Gravity is different from other forces and why the universe is like that. Why become hot and isomorphic bodies? Why are subatomic particles able to avoid the classical laws of physics, requiring everything to be positioned specifically to move from point A to point B, which has both position and momentum. * Even the important principles of quantum mechanics Is that all phenomena consist of discrete energy and packet matter (Separate objects instead of full wave continuous envelopes) which cause conflicts because in some cases, of course The types of matter look like waves of particles in other bodies. The format used depends on whether observers measure these qualities or not.

 Although quantum theorists (actually adherents, because their operations seem to be solid) believe that the work of waves and particles is both quantum phenomena, it seems that there are problems with waves because waves have Nature is continuous and can go in all directions, turns around without boundaries. How do you define something as a discrete data packet?

 The nature of "quantitative" seems to require the position and momentum gained instead of a vague binary, a probable process. On the one hand, to the subatomic level, quantum interpretation can be said to be more consistent with locals than to non-locals. However, not only But will show that the interaction of the particles is not local But they can also interact with other particles that they first touched (Even beyond the speed of light) ... Einstein called them "

 Einstein is one of the critics of the unlimited nature of quantum, which he believes is not really necessary to study physics. * Although his criticism is a critic of Neil Bohr, he is reasonable. For physical exaggeration If he stays longer, he may continue to criticize him, not just because of the existence of unproven theories. (Or can not prove) many such as very important theory, superstring theory, gravity theory, eddy holographic theory and theory (from string theory) and many other theories because no one observes atoms or electrons or photons at In fact, the terms "particles" and "atoms" are defined differently as groups of energy or matter. No one knows what they are.

 This tells us that when people use all the Byzantine equations written on the blackboard to prove that certain theories "Matching math" is not the opposite, right ... Physicists are still trying to define elephants like blind people.

 Anthropology ...

 One of the most interesting problems in theoretical physics is based on human principles. If it's a metaphysical effort to explain why observational results will change the results, this is an interesting attempt. In particular, it seems that by measuring / observing the path and position of the particles, we have changed another This shows that we are forbidden to discover. Almost like the admonition of God to Adam and Eve, he did not want humans to eat from the tree of knowledge. But this distortion gives the most basic ingredient of nature the ability to curtail his most complex knowledge.

 that