leefi
BAD AT BEING A WOMAN
WORSE AT BEING A MAN | Hana | she/her/he/him | aesthetic blog @sumaaira | recipe blog @video-recipes
84240 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Last Seen Blogs
newyorkvapecarts
New York Vape Carts
lambcurl
open sesame
sohma-sohma
littleseedsofwealth.com
applesomibin
여장남자 cd소미빈 풀업씨디
floewe-mikellino
Dibujos de mike
Note
does the tennis movie have throuple happenings for real 👀
yes. the fucked up psychosexual relationship between the three of them is the crux of the entire movie
83 notes
·
View notes
Text
There is a sort of constant battle between the two of them to the degree that they are fighting, but they are taking care of one another. When the sugar goes on the cheek of Patrick, Art takes it off with his hand in a very nice gesture of kindness -- and very intimate, I would say. But at the same time, they are really tense. And I think it’s about being jealous of one another, but at the same time wanting one another.
Challengers (2024) dir. Luca Guadagnino
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
that was the best bisexual drama I have ever seen on screen.
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
can you get that weird guy out of here please. I’m starting to feel a little bit flustered and i don’t want to confront & come to terms with that right now
7K notes
·
View notes
Note
shuffle your favorite playlist and post the first five songs that come up. then copy/paste this ask to your favorite mutuals <3
hello my sweet angel woman
Nonsense — Sabrina Carpenter
Bouncin’ — Tinashe
II HANDS II HEAVEN — Beyoncé
DUCKWORTH. — Kendrick Lamar
Johnny B. Goode — Chuck Berry
really had a vibe going with the first 3 that got obliterated 😭
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
need to switch to this fully remote role quickly so i can leave this state of psychosis
there is nothing more agonizing than an inappropriate unreciprocated crush. i feel like i need to be euthanized
9 notes
·
View notes
Note
would you a marry a swiftie with the same politics as you or a fascist with the same taste in art as you
this website has elevated suicide bait to an immaculate artform perfected like no other culture in history
19K notes
·
View notes
Text
almost just said “thank you babygirl” to a coworker
1 note
·
View note
Note
What's your take on game directors who also work as writers or designers on the project? Is it better to keep it church and state? Or does it depend on team size? For example, in a narrative-heavy project, it seems to make sense to me that direction should come from the writers' room. But there's also some good arguments on the side of the camp who believes the director should not be the one doing any "doing" in any discipline. What would you advise, from your experience?
Thank you!
Unsurprisingly, I am in favor of directors doing some in-engine work on their projects. Confirmation bias is heavily at work here because I've done direct implementation on all of the games I've directed.
On F:NV I wrote* Arcade, Hanlon, Joshua Graham, and other characters in our editor. I also implemented and tuned all of the weapons and mods (and other system design things like perks and recipes) in the GECK.
On Pillars of Eternity, I wrote Pallegina and a few minor characters in OEI Tools. I did direct in (Unity) editor implementation and tuning of many spells and items (though Tim Cain implemented much of the code that I used). I also did some encounter work in editor.
On Deadfire, I wrote Pallegina, Eothas, and a few other convos in OEI Tools. I did less in-engine system work because I had a small team of system designers and I had more director responsibilities, but I did do some tweaking and tuning in the game data editor (GDE) of OEI Tools.
On Pentiment I wrote around 1/4 to 1/3 of the dialogue in OEI Tools and set up all of our dialogue checks in the GDE. I mostly stayed out of Unity because Matthew Loyola and Alec Frey handled most of the design tasks there. On Pentiment I did a far greater percentage of content work than I normally would, but it was also a team of 13 people with only 3 writers (including me) at any given time.
Here's what I think the "pros" are: you have a better understanding of the pipelines people are using, you are doing work under (mostly) the same conditions as the people you are leading. You are directly touching the data that is going into the game and it makes you acutely aware of what's involved in doing that (at least in part).
The cons are the obvious ones: your main job is leading people and if your nose is buried in the weeds, that can be difficult to do. Also when it comes time to cut content, you might get precious about the work you've done vs. the work other people have done.
In my experience, the important thing is to not overcommit. Do a little work, sure, but err on the side of a light load. It's not practical for you to even have a quarter of the content workload as someone working on the staff.
*Minor note but when I say, "wrote" that also includes any related scripting done within dialogue for checks, setting global variables, etc. All Obsidian narrative designers are expected to do the scripting for their dialogues, though the interface in OEI Tools makes that generally pretty painless.
206 notes
·
View notes