Tumgik
jess-moloney · 2 hours
Note
Full photo dump. Bakery in Paris and the church in Georgia USA
https://moonlitdark.tumblr.com/post/748816059269840896/ig-bowerjamie-a-recent-dump
That all seems like a random mess of nonsense and not like something I've seen Jamie do before. Usually his photos even if they are all in one pic dump are related to one another or some central theme and recent, aren't they? What was this? It's like a drunken hobo got access to his phone and posted whatever random pictures they could find.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 2 hours
Text
I wanted to add that in the Beats Rewind interview Jess claims that Ice Studios (the "artist collective") is a talent agency but also she didn't want to call it that because they were more like a "family" or something.
Now, this interview was in 2021 so it's possible at the time it was a talent agency (though you'd have never known it looking at their broken-ass website). If you look it up now on public records they definitely do not have a license to be a talent agency.
Once again, this could be because they are using a different registered name or Jess isn't using her real name or some other legal thing but I don't see why they'd register it under another name since if "talent" signed with Ice Studios then it would be on contracts. Hence why they'd need to have a registered license to be a talent agency.
So what is this? A scam? A way to sign people under false pretenses and steal their money? Why would Jess call this place an agency when I don't really think it ever was, nor can I find proof that it ever was. It's filed as just a business. Does Jess use this to "hire" talent and get a bunch of under the table money when she's not licensed in the first place?
So much of her story doesn't add up when you put all the pieces together including the fact that there's no interview about Ice Studios I can find anywhere that Renell herself says Jess Moloney is the co-founder. Why not mention that even one time? Especially if what Jess says is so true about her being such ain integral part of creating Ice Studios and "making it what it is"? Who's telling the truth here? Because it would seem if you look at it from Renell's side, Jess has far less to do with it than Jess claims.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 3 hours
Text
Jess has been posting like clockwork for the past few days. She's been getting people to tag her as well. Like Renell. Except her account is private so what is that supposed to do?
If it's for promotion then I don't think many people will care that much about her account being private to request a follow (if that's what she's trying to do, build intrigue). Even more curiously why doesn't Renell just tell these people to follow Jess. Her and Renell are supposed to be "like family" so why aren't these huge celebrities interested in following Jess even if they follow Renell who you think would speak very highly of her and overly promote her account.
If Renell is doing this then these people are choosing to ignore Renell for some reason. Maybe Jess has a reputation. Maybe they know she's a fraud. If Renell isn't doing this then why isn't she doing this? Wouldn't she want the co-founder of her own "business" to be just as known and popular as she is?
Jess also doesn't seem to be accepting any follow requests from random people (that I know of). I think this is an attempt to get Renell to promote her so maybe celebrities are like "who is this mystery account I must follow her" or something? But I don't know why they would care?
On top of that, Renell hasn't liked or commented on any posts she's been tagged in. Even if she wanted to share the posts she couldn't because Jess is private. Jess also is using the same tired old gimmick of tagging every important person she can think of. Most of them do not follow her and would never give her the time of day anyway.
If she's not sharing anything unusual or private (for that matter) and she's doing exactly what she used to do, why is she private?
My theory is that it's possible that she is aware of this blog and that I (and others) have repeatedly called her out for stealing photos and posting them seemingly without permission as well as misattributing their tags to Ice Studios. She wants to keep operating as usual for her "fans" who don't know that she's doing this but she doesn't want people to read my blog, go to her account, and see that is what 90% of her account is. Stolen photos were misattributed to Ice Studios.
That's really the only theory I have and I admit that it's completely out there. If anyone else has a theory I'd like to hear it because her continuing to post as she usually does (plus increasing her posts about Peace Over Violence that only a limited amount of people will ever see) doesn't make sense. It's what she's always done, so what is she hiding, why, and why now?
1 note · View note
jess-moloney · 3 hours
Note
That one photo of him smiling from the photo dump intrigues me. It’s not just your average smiling photo it’s like he’s laughing at something, or someone; like a reaction to something.
Has me wondering what considering she wasn’t with him on that trip. It’s weird he decided to post from that long ago and claim it as being recent.
Posting old posts as recent is far more a thing Jess does.
But Jess wasn't with him on that trip she'd have definitely made it known one way or another. At least, what I can say more accurately is that there is absolutely no proof Jess was there with him as of now. Maybe she just hasn't posted photos or maybe she really wasn't there. Don't need the stans to get on my ass saying I'm "making things up". The evidence as it is now remains that there is 0 proof Jess was with him in Italy.
That being said, I agree about the nature of that laughing photo. Like he's reacting to someone or something that is there. It reminds me of how he'd laugh in those interviews with Joseph. A very genuine hearty laugh. Not posed for social media.
I also still think the caption is odd. It doesn't seem very Jamie to me to say "a recent dump". Has he ever pic dumped like that before? (I'm not saying he hasn't but I have only been in the fandom a few years and personally have not noticed him doing things like that or if/when he has posted a bunch of photos all at once they've been more recent and related to each other. Someone said this pic dump included random photos of buildings as well? Can that be confirmed?)
Ultimately, only Jamie and more than likely Jess know what is going on here. She's still posting like normal, in fact, she's posted about every day for the last 2-3 days and she's following huge celebrities and brands like crazy. Which, I still don't understand what the point of being private is since she has changed nothing about her posting style but if she was doing it to attract attention before she'll get even less now since no one can see her tags or share her posts. All of this is very weird.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 6 hours
Note
https://twitter. com/ElArkenston/status/1783835983655657893?t=dJPrxss8QgoCP9iGG9z2Uw&s=19
Tumblr media
Seems like opinions on what the context of this tweet means are split. As I said people can believe what they want but we have two sides going on and it's weird. I've spoken to a number of people about this including UK fans and I can assure you there's a lot of people who are UK based who don't know the answer. So once and for all the only answer I will give is that more context is needed. Believe what you want to believe because no one has the answer.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 6 hours
Text
I'm not taking anymore asks on this subject since I've said how I feel and what I feel about context. If you feel you disagree write a post on your own blog. If you send it to me it will be deleted. I don't want to go over this time and again when I've explained twice now my thoughts on it. Believe whatever you want no one is making you agree with me and sending me your rants on it won't change my mind. Thank you.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 6 hours
Note
UK fan here. A bourbon cream is a chocolate biscuit (cookie) that is commonly dunked in a cup of tea here. Google them. The tweet was an innocent comment and referring to Jamie being British and our love of a good cuppa and some biscuits to accompany them! I also think the fan that replied saying they'd make him one was also referring to the cup of tea rather than an alcoholic drink.
I made a note of this in my post. I maintain that because both things exists and there's no real context there's no way to know. Also, we'd have to assume that Jamie is in the states and that coupled with his erratic behaviour I don't think it's 50/50. If there were more context then who knows. I'm trying to look at this including everything we currently know which is weird and let's not pretend people haven't been questioning his sobriety since his accident last year.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 6 hours
Note
I do hope Jamie is still sober. Since someone has replied to his post in regards needing coffee. "Cup of tea and a bourbon cream will sort you out lad." and Jamie saying "Absolutely" but it could be a harmless reply not 100% indicating he's back for booze or anything having alcohol. I worry for him...
Tumblr media
That is weird, even if he's making a joke or jokingly replying why would it? Is he still sober? Has he slipped up? I don't know what this could mean. Even worse did you see the replies after he said absolutely?
Tumblr media
This person saying she'll make him a drink if he tells more about BloodMagic merchandise. Do his fans even care about his sobriety? Even if it is a joke which we don't know...why is no one questioning the implications of this in the first place?
Edit: Before someone comes yelling at me, I'm aware there is a biscuit with this name Bourbon Cream but there's also a drink with this name which is alcoholic and we do not have context to what was meant here it could mean either. It's a 50/50 shot.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 6 hours
Note
Someone asked the timeline of his posts and this is how the timeline goes as per GMT all though its a different timezone for him I'm sure.
Around 9.30 am GMT he made an Instagram dump. (Which seemed absurd to me, honestly. The post style just wasn't Jamie's. He hardly does these kind of dumps and the caption also didn't seem like something he would say unless he was literally pointing out to a break up.)
Anyway, by 10.00 am GMT I tried to check the post again and the post was gone. Idk when exactly he deleted it though.
Around 12.15 pm GMT there's the tongue tweet.
In about 10 or 12 minutes, the tweet is gone and followed by the coffee tweet.
So the IG post came first then was deleted shortly after. A few hours later there was the tweet then it was replaced. Which could indicate the tweet was addressing the situation on IG but then later deleted. Thank you for the information.
I agree that it's a very bizarre style of post for him, if he did it. Maybe it was Jess, maybe it was him because he broke up with her. Maybe it was a lot of things. The holding my tongue tweet is bizarre because it's very much saying he wants to say something but can't then he gets rid of it and says he just needs coffee.
I wonder what's going on with him.
2 notes · View notes
jess-moloney · 7 hours
Note
It seems to me like a kind of provocation, in the sense of "look, where I was and I was there without you and look how I enjoyed it, I smile honestly and happily, I even laughed".
And in that case, it would be completely clear who deleted it.
Does it seem like that just to me?
It very well could be. That it was some kind of taunt since we know he was there without her and probably had a great time being free of her shit whilst finally getting back to attending fashion events as he used to love to do before she came in and tried to take over. However, as I've said, there's nothing that can be definitively stated since we don't know. Other than this behaviour is weird and I don't think it's a mistake for someone to post to that large of an audience. It's deliberate. As I said he knows that he's posting to plenty of people who will see it even if it's only up for 30 seconds. He's not stupid. I'm sure he carefully curates whatever posts he wants to go up he doesn't just do it on a whim. It honestly looks like there's a fight happening for control over both accounts.
4 notes · View notes
jess-moloney · 7 hours
Note
Does anyone have a timeline of when the tweets and Instagram posts were made today? Like, did he:
- make the Instagram post
- delete it
- tweet
- delete
If this is the case, I wonder if his "biting my tongue" tweet was a direct result of the Instagram deletion (indicating an action not made by him) and he was furious about it. Mouthed off on Twitter then thought better of it then deleted it after considering of the possible repercussions.
I don't know the answer to this. I think the tweet was posted very early this morning but I don't know if it was posted before or after. Does anyone else have a better idea?
0 notes
jess-moloney · 8 hours
Note
From that "photo dump" judging from the location and him dressed, that looks like when he went to the Tom Ford fashion show. But something does seem strange and not your typical Jamie strange.
It definitely does seem like that time period because of the suit. Why dump it now? Why not when it happened? Why delete it? What was so bad about it that he needed to delete it? And yes people will say "this happens all the time" but here's the thing (to the people who say this)
When you post a set of photos then quickly regret it you're probably not posting it to what, 4 million followers? Maybe some of you have a couple thousand if that. Jamie is well aware of how many followers he has that even if it's only up for a moment or two people will see it. I don't think he's "accidentally" posting things then quickly regretting them. He's posted much weirder things and kept them up.
The idea that Jamie who definitely knows he has a huge following would accidentally post something doesn't work. I don't believe he put those up to what he knows is a huge following then went "oops" and took them down because of some sort of regret. He'd just not post at all if he had any doubts about doing it.
I think on both his Twitter and IG there's some struggle going on for ownership and what's being posted and when. This is happening too much for it to be some sort of random regret or mistake posts because he knows how many followers he has and he knows that the posts will remain somehow even after he removes them. Or, more accurately, whoever is making the posts does.
2 notes · View notes
jess-moloney · 10 hours
Note
A recent dump
What a strange turn of phrase. And choice of words. Or lack thereof.
Surely "a photo dump of recent times" (or something similar to "times") makes more sense. Instead it emphasises that the dump is recent, not necessarily the photos.
The words he chose seem very precise and to a point. He's a writer and will understand the nuances of how things read.
Then again, perhaps I'm reading more into it than is necessary and as you joked, he was just making a poop joke lol
Sorry if what I've written doesn't make sense. It does in my head and I'm not all that good at putting my words together to describe what I'm thinking.
I agree it seems like there would have been a better way to phrase that and he'd have known how it came across. I also agree that we could just be reading too much into it but this keeps happening, yeah? And then we see he's using a TracFone for some reason to post. It could be Jess, he could be trying to get control back over his accounts, or it could just be random Jamie weirdness but as I've always said he's not been like this before Jess. Then she announces her stupid "We have a rule in this house" nonsense and you can see Jamie isn't following it because of the time of his tweets. Something has to be going on with them they just aren't being public about it.
2 notes · View notes
jess-moloney · 10 hours
Note
The photos published and quickly deleted by Jamie have a pattern that is not his. Several random photos were published, possibly taken on different days and locations… 1st photo of him in his house… another in Italy… the last photo of a house next to a cemetery. Who has this pattern of putting several random photos together? FUCKING JESS!!!!!
I mean that's true. Like when she posted that photo dump when she was in England that included things that happened weeks before and were in a random order that didn't make any sense. I can't help but wonder if there's something going on with the ownership of these accounts with how things are posted then deleted so quickly.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 10 hours
Text
How long before malarkey claims that I’m a Jamie hate blog because I’ve said I don’t think people should gamble on buying his merchandise without solid reason to think they’ll get it. Taking all bets.
2 notes · View notes
jess-moloney · 10 hours
Note
renell hasn’t liked or commented on any of the posts jess has tagged her in even though renell tagged jess in her story that jess reposted but no like or coment on the same vid jess posted or anything else
I noticed that as well. Jess went private so you'd think Renell would be more attentive to the tags and previously Renell has at least left a like or two. The most recent posts, all of them, have been ignored by Renell entirely. I swear it's like Jess is making these people tag her so she looks more important (or to draw attention to her account). Jess followed Kendall Jenner and Mercedes (probably trying to get a follow back from some big names by being all *mysterious*) but since she doesn't go to these shoots and she doesn't know any of these people (and they don't know her) why would they give a damn enough to follow her back? Especially now that she's private? If they can't see who she is in the first place they aren't going to really care. I don't know what her plan is in this whole privacy game but I also don't think it's working the way she intended it to.
0 notes
jess-moloney · 11 hours
Text
When will Jess stans learn this isn’t the blog for them to submit their asks and theories and justification for Jamie being with Jess? You go grasp at straws somewhere else as I won’t be addressing whatever you send. That Makarkey blog will gladly take your fan fiction if you’d like to send it there. Thanks for your understanding.
2 notes · View notes