watercolor comm 🖌 Ravenel 😚
845 notes
·
View notes
That third panel
AUSTIN BUTLER · CALLUM TURNER · ANTHONY BOYLE
↳ · Behind The Scenes · 'Masters of the Air' set
1K notes
·
View notes
h. gaunt and s. ellwood, 1912, preparations for a ball
(save their poor hearts)
221 notes
·
View notes
⚡️⚡️⚡️ This one is so cute! Ty @angelfruittree for the tag 🤍
5 notes
·
View notes
Anne Carson, from Autobiography of Red
9K notes
·
View notes
These two haven’t left my head in a year
81 notes
·
View notes
One of the things C.S. Pacat does so, so well in the Captive Prince trilogy is trusting the reader to read between the lines.
An example: in the first book, when the boar hunt happens, it is never explicitly stated (at least the time, maybe it's discussed later and I can't remember) that someone had fucked with Laurent's horse. All Damen sees is that the horse is sweaty and intractable, which he takes as a sign that Laurent either can't afford a good horse or sucks at picking one for a hunt. Later, after the horse is killed in the boar hunt, Damen notices that Laurent comes in in a vicious mood, but he never realizes that Laurent is reacting to a murder attempt and grieving the death of the horse.
The details are all there. Laurent speaks softly to the horse. A guard explains that the horse was good and well trained. Laurent yelled at a guard for not putting her down fast enough. And when Laurent tells Damen it's "just a horse", Damen marks his tone as "jagged" and "private" despite the flippant words. But he still doesn't connect the dots.
The trilogy is full of these little mysteries, threads left unexplained, that close reading and careful analysis of the characters will reveal to the reader. Considering most books make their POV character clever enough that they can lay out these threads blatantly for the reader to follow, it's a refreshing change.
686 notes
·
View notes
Seven years after the break-up.
2K notes
·
View notes
"It's not your fault"
(Uploading old artwork 9/10)
785 notes
·
View notes